用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同坡位山杏天然林生长和土壤理化性质比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison on Armeniaca sibirica Natural Forest Growth and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Different Slope Position
  • 作者:姚颖 ; 刘建明 ; 刘忠玲 ; 温爱亭 ; 吕跃东
  • 英文作者:YAO Ying;LIU Jianming;LIU Zhongling;WEN Aiting;LV Yuedong;Heilongjiang Forest Research Institute;
  • 关键词:山杏 ; 天然林 ; 理化性质 ; 坡位 ; 土层深度
  • 英文关键词:Armeniaca sibirica;;natural forest;;physical and chemical properties;;slope position;;soil depth
  • 中文刊名:森林工程
  • 英文刊名:Forest Engineering
  • 机构:黑龙江省林业科学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-10-30 16:18
  • 出版单位:森林工程
  • 年:2019
  • 期:06
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD07B03)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:40-45+58
  • 页数:7
  • CN:23-1388/S
  • ISSN:1006-8023
  • 分类号:S662.2;S714
摘要
以山杏天然林为研究对象,对不同坡位山杏林木生长和土壤理化性质进行比较分析,了解不同立地条件下山杏天然林木生长和林地土壤肥力的差异,为山杏人工林经营提供依据。结果表明:山杏天然林林下土壤成碱性,p H随坡位和土层深度的增加而呈上升趋势;随着坡位的降低,林木生长状况和土壤理化性质逐渐好转,呈正相关趋势,同一坡位表层土壤肥力状况优于深层土壤。因此,在山杏人工林立地选择时,若能充分考虑坡位的影响,优化经营方式,将有助于改善立地土壤环境,提高山杏人工林的生长质量状况。
        Using Armeniaca sibirica natural forests as the research object,the growth and soil physical and chemical properties in different slope position were compared and analyzed,and the difference of growth and soil fertility of Armeniaca sibirica natural forests in different site conditions were understood,which provided the basis for the management of Armeniaca sibirica natural forests. The results showed that the Armeniaca sibirica natural forest soil were generally alkalinitic,p H value increased as the soil depth and slope position increased,with the decrease of slope,tress growth and soil physical and chemical properties had been improved gradually showing a positive trend,the surface soil fertility was better than deep soil in the same slope position. As a result,at the time of building Armeniaca sibirica plantations in the future,if we can fully consider the impact of slope position and optimize the management mode,it will help to improve the standing soil environment and improve the growth quality of apricot plantation.
引文
[1]杨柳.影响山杏产量的因子及改进措施[J].北方园艺,2000,26(2):26-27.YANG L. Factors affecting apricot yield and improvement measures[J]. Northern Horticulture,2000,26(2):26-27.
    [2]姚显明,夏志立,刘宝树,等.半干旱地区DJS造林技术[J]东北林业大学学报,2004,32(5):108-110.YAO X M,XIA Z L,LIU B S,et al. DJS afforestation technique in semi-arid areas[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2004,32(5):108-110.
    [3]严吕荣,韩兴国,陈灵芝.六种木本植物水分利用效率和其小生境关系研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1952-1956.YAN L R,HAN X G,CHEN L Z. Water use efficiency of six woody species in relation to micro-environmental factors of different habitats[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2001,21(11):1952-1956.
    [4]曲志义.山杏人工林丰产技术研究[J]内蒙古林业科技,2000,26(3):24-29.QU Z Y. Study on high-yielding technology of Prunus armeniaca var. ansu Maxim Plantation[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science&Technology,2000,26(3):24-29.
    [5]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.Nanjing Institute of Soil Sciences. Chinese Academy of Sciences.Physical and chemical properties of soil[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers,1978.
    [6]中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.Committee of Agricultural Chemistry of China Soil Society. Conventional analytical methods for soil agricultural chemistry[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1983.
    [7]邹文秀,韩晓增,陆欣春,等.不同土地利用方式对黑土剖面土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):187-193.ZOU W X,HAN X Z,LU X C,et al. Effect of land use types on physical properties of black soil profiles[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(5):187-193.
    [8]陈袓松.不同治理模式的红壤物理性质与渗透性能研究[J].福建林学院学报,1997,17(3):197-201.CHEN Z S. A study on different control model for soil physical properties and infiltration capacity of red soil[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry,1997,17(3):197-201.
    [9]韦建宏,侯敏,韦添露,等.不同坡位桉树人工林生长和土壤理化性质比较[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(5):167-169.WEI J H,HOU M,WEI T L,et al. Comparison on Eucalyptus spp plantation growth and soil physicochemical properties in different slope position[J]. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci.,2017,45(5):167-169.
    [10]史东梅,吕刚,蒋光毅,等.马尾松林地土壤物理性质变化及抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):35-39.SHI D H,LV G,JIANG G Y,et al. Study on anti-erodibility and change of soil physical property in Pinus massoniana woodland[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,19(6):35-39.
    [11]张志云,蔡学林,黎祖尧,等.土壤物理性质与林木生长关系的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,1991,13(1):28-32.ZHANG Z Y,CAI X L,LI Z Y,et al. Studies on the relationship between the growth of Chinese Fir and Masson Pine and soil physical properties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,1991,13(1):28-32.
    [12]高雪松,邓良基,张世熔.不同利用方式与坡位土壤物理性质及养分特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):53-60.GAO X S,DENG L J,ZHANG S R. Soil physical properties and nutrient properties under different utilization styles and slope position[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,19(2):53-60.
    [13]王晓燕,燕沟流域侵蚀强度演变特征研究[D].杨陵:西北农林科技大学,2003.WANG X Y. Study on the characters of erosion intensity evolvementina Yanguo watershed[D]. Yanglin:Northwest Sci-tech University of Agriculture and Forestry,2003.
    [14]杨宽.高山毛竹林不同坡位和土层深度的土壤理化性质[J].安徽农业科学.2016,44(13):211-213,216.YANG K. Soil physical and chemical properties of high-mountain moso namboo forests at different slope positions and soil depths[J]. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci.. 2016,44(13):211-213,216.
    [15]余雪标,莫晓勇,龙腾,等.不同连栽代次桉树林枯落物及其养分组成研究[J].海南大学学报:自然科学版,1999,17(2):140-144.YU X B,MO X Y,LONG T,et al. Study on litter fall and nutrient composition of eucalypt plantation with different continuousplanting rotation[J]. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University,1999,17(2):140-144.
    [16]廖善刚,叶志君,汪炎明,等.桉树人工林与杉木林、毛竹林土壤理化性质对比研究[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2008,3(3):53-58.LIAO S G,YE Z J,WANG Y M,et al. A comparative study on physical and chemical properties of soils in eucalyptus plantations,Chinese fir plantations and bamboo forest[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment,2008,3(3):53-58.
    [17]李敏,丁贵杰,孙学广,等.贵州马尾松群落植物多样性与土壤酶活性[J].福建林学院学报,201,36(4):434-441.LI M,DING G J,SUN X G,et al. Plant diversity and soil enzyme activity in 4 typical communities of Pinus massoniana in Guizhou[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment,2016,36(4):434-441.
    [18]杨红,徐唱唱,赛曼,等.不同土地利用方式对土壤含水量、p H值及电导率的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(11):1922-1927.YANG H,XU C C,SAI M,et al. Effects of land use on soil moisture,pH and electrical conductivity[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2016,28(11):1922-1927.
    [19]袁智.植物叶片蒸腾作用模拟[D].北京:中国科学技术大学,2013.YUAN Z. The simulation of the traspiration of the plant leaf[J].Beijing:University of Science and Technology of China,2013.
    [20]张忠华,胡刚.南亚热带次生林土壤p H值与含水量的空间异质性[J].生态科学,2014,33(11):148-153.ZHANG Z H,HU G. Spatial heterogeneity of soil pH and water content in a southern subtropical secondary forest[J]. Ecological Science,2014,33(11):148-153.
    [21]肖兴翠,李志辉,张志兰,等.施肥对湿地松中龄林生长及土壤的影响[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(16):6-13.XIAO X C,LI Z H,ZHANG Z L,et al. Effects of fertilization on the growth and soil of middle-aged slash pine forest[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015,31(16):6-13.
    [22]张家春,贺红早,张玉武,等.黔东南不同林地土壤物理性质及养分含量差异[J].河南农业科学,2014,43(8):49-53.ZHANG J C,HE H Z,ZHANG Y W,et al. Analysis of nutrient content and physical property of soil from different forest lands in southeast Guizhou province[J]. Journal of Henan Africultural Sciences,2014,43(8):49-53.
    [23]刘西军,黄庆丰,聂昌伟,等.肖坑不同森林类型土壤氮、磷含量研宄[J].安徽农业大学学报,2008,35(1):124-127.LIU X J,HUANG Q F,NIE C W,et al. Research on nitrogen and phosphorus content in soil of different forest types in Xiaokeng[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural University,2008,35(1):124-127.
    [24]刘建培.土壤肥力对余甘子产量的影响[J].应用研究,2006,20(1):45-48.LIU J P. The impact of soil fertility on the yield of phyllanthus emblica L[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering,2006,20(1):45-48.
    [25]周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区侵蚀环境不同剖面及坡位土壤理化特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):8-12.ZHOU P,LIU G B,HOU X L. Study on soil physical and nutrients properties of different slope aspects and positions in eroded Loess Hilly Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,22(1):8-12.
    [26] SU Y Z,ZHAO H L. Soil properties and plant species in an age sequence of Caragana microphylla plantations in the Horqin Sandy Land,north China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2003,20(3):223-235.
    [27] KELLOGG L E,BRIDGHAM S D. Phosphorus retention and movement across an ombrotrophic minerotrophic peatland gradient[J]. Biogeochemistry,2003,63:299-315.
    [28]高国雄,李得庆,贾俊姝,等.退耕还林不同配置模式对土壤养分的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(5):104-107.GAO G X,LI D Q,JIA J S,et al. Research on soil fertility of different species arrangement models in converted farmland land[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2007,21(5):104-107.
    [29]徐志友,余峰,高红军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同坡位退耕还林还草地土壤养分的变异规律[J].中国水土保持,2010,30(8):39-41.XU Z Y,YU F,GAO H J,et al. Variation laws of soil nutrients of returning cultivated land to woodland to grassland at different slope positions of semi-arid gullied rolling Loess Area[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,2010,30(8):39-41.
    [30]樊兰英,闫丽娟.省域尺度油松人工林生产力与土壤养分关系研究[J].林业科技,2018,43(6):14-16.FAN L Y,YAN L J. Study on relationship of forest productivity and soil nutrients of pinus tabuliformis plantation in provincial scale[J]. Forestry Science&Technology,2018,43(6):14-16.
    [31]尹梅,洪丽芳,付利波,等.曲站市坡耕地土壤养分的空间变异性及:与利用方式的关系[J]土壤通报,2013,44(1):35-41.YIN M,HONG L F,FU L B,et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients and their relationship with different land utilization types in sloping farmland in Qujing[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2013,44(1):35-41.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700