肉豆蔻科4种植物幼苗生长与光合生理特性研究
|
摘要
以肉豆蔻科风吹楠、大叶风吹楠、琴叶风吹楠和红光树的1年生幼苗为试材,对其生长量、叶片性状及光合特性进行了比较分析。结果表明:4种植物幼苗的苗高和地径差异均达到极显著水平,苗木生长排序依次为风吹楠>大叶风吹楠>琴叶风吹楠>红光树。4种幼苗的叶长、叶宽、叶面积、叶厚、比叶面积及叶脉密度在种间差异极显著,其中,按叶面积大小排序依次为大叶风吹楠>琴叶风吹楠>红光树>风吹楠,比叶面积大小排序依次为琴叶风吹楠>风吹楠>大叶风吹楠>红光树。大叶风吹楠净光合速率显著高于其他3个种,风吹楠和琴叶风吹楠相当,而红光树极显著小于其他3个种;红光树和风吹楠具有较高的光饱和点,较低的光补偿点,且红光树的瞬时水分利用效率较高,说明红光树对环境适应范围较宽,但其对应的净光合速率较低、叶片较少,植株生长矮小。大叶风吹楠和琴叶风吹楠的光饱和点相对较低,最大净光合速率和光补偿点较高,生长较快,对环境适应范围相对较窄。
One-year-old seedlings of Horsfieldia glabra, Horsfieldia kingii, Horsfieldia pandurifolia and Knema furfuracea were used as test materials. The seedling growth, leaf traits and photosynthetic characteristics were measured and compared. The results show that the seedling height and ground diameter of 4 plant seedlings reach a very significant level, and the seedling growth order is Horsfieldia glabra> Horsfieldia kingii> Horsfieldia pandurifolia> Knema furfuracea. The leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, leaf thickness, specific leaf area and leaf vein density of the four seedlings are significantly different among species, and the order of leaf area is Horsfieldia kingii > Horsfieldia pandurifolia > Knema furfuracea > Horsfieldia glabra. And Sorting by the specific leaf area, it is as Horsfieldia pandurifolia > Horsfieldia glabra > Horsfieldia kingii > Knema furfuracea. Pnof Horsfieldia kingii is significantly higher than that of the other 3 species, Horsfieldia glabra and Horsfieldia pandurifolia is similarly moderate and Knema furfuracea is the lowest. Knema furfuracea and Horsfieldia glabra have higher LSP and lower LCP. And Knema furfuracea also shows higher instantaneous WUEi of indicating Knema furfuracea has a wider range of environmental adaptation. Simultaneously, Knema furfuracea shows lower corresponding net photosynthetic rate, less leaves and dwarfed growth. Horsfieldia kingii and Horsfieldia pandurifolia exhibit relatively lower LSP, higher(Pn, max) and LCP as well as faster growth, but its has a narrow range of environmental adaptation.
One-year-old seedlings of Horsfieldia glabra, Horsfieldia kingii, Horsfieldia pandurifolia and Knema furfuracea were used as test materials. The seedling growth, leaf traits and photosynthetic characteristics were measured and compared. The results show that the seedling height and ground diameter of 4 plant seedlings reach a very significant level, and the seedling growth order is Horsfieldia glabra> Horsfieldia kingii> Horsfieldia pandurifolia> Knema furfuracea. The leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, leaf thickness, specific leaf area and leaf vein density of the four seedlings are significantly different among species, and the order of leaf area is Horsfieldia kingii > Horsfieldia pandurifolia > Knema furfuracea > Horsfieldia glabra. And Sorting by the specific leaf area, it is as Horsfieldia pandurifolia > Horsfieldia glabra > Horsfieldia kingii > Knema furfuracea. Pnof Horsfieldia kingii is significantly higher than that of the other 3 species, Horsfieldia glabra and Horsfieldia pandurifolia is similarly moderate and Knema furfuracea is the lowest. Knema furfuracea and Horsfieldia glabra have higher LSP and lower LCP. And Knema furfuracea also shows higher instantaneous WUEi of indicating Knema furfuracea has a wider range of environmental adaptation. Simultaneously, Knema furfuracea shows lower corresponding net photosynthetic rate, less leaves and dwarfed growth. Horsfieldia kingii and Horsfieldia pandurifolia exhibit relatively lower LSP, higher(Pn, max) and LCP as well as faster growth, but its has a narrow range of environmental adaptation.
引文
[1]刘旻霞,车应弟,李俐蓉,等.甘南高寒草甸微地形上植物叶片特征与环境因子的冗余分析[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(9):2473-2480.
[2]殷谷丽,唐建维,杨成源,等.4种省藤属植物的光合特征与叶片性状及生长的相关性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(6):104-112.
[3]Craine J M,Froehle J,Tilman D G,et al.The relation-ships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients[J].Oikos,2001,93(2):274-285.
[4]Garnier E,Laurent G,Bellmann A,et al.Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits[J].New Phytologist,2001,152(1):69-83.
[5]Vendramini F,Díaz S,Gurvich D E,et al.Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species[J].New Phytologist,2002,154(1):147-157.
[6]崔西甜,袁凤辉,王安志,等.蒙古栎叶片光合作用随叶龄的变化及其与叶片功能性状的关系[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3160-3167.
[7]刘曼霞.亚高寒草甸不同坡向植物光合生理和叶片形态差异[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8526-8536.
[8]刘超,武娴,王襄平,等.内蒙古灌木叶性状关系及不同尺度的比较[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(6):23-29.
[9]Garnier E,Shipley B,Roumet C,et al.A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content[J].Functional Ecology,2001,15(5):688-695.
[10]Wilson P J,Thompson K,Hodgson J G.Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J].New Phytologist,1999,143(1):155-162.
[11]Murchie E H,Horton P.Contrasting patterns of photosynthetic acclimation to the light environment are dependent on the differential expression of the responses to altered irradiance and spectral quality[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,1998,21(2):139-148.
[12]Wang R Z.Photosynthesis,transpiration,and water use efficiency of vegetative and reproductive shoots of grassland species from north-eastern China[J].Photosynthetica,2001,39(4):569-573.
[13]Sauquet H.Androecium diversity and evolution in Myristicaceae(Magnoliales),with a description of a new Malagasy genus,Doyleanthus gennov[J].American Journal of Botany,2003,90(9):1293-1305.
[14]Sauquet H,Doyle J A,Scharaschkin T,et al.Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets:implications for character evolution[J].Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,2003,142(2):125-186.
[15]蒋英,李秉滔.中国植物志:第30卷[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.
[16]张平,徐凤霞.肉豆蔻科(Myristicaceae)3属国产种类的叶表皮形态观察[J].电子显微学报,2010,29(5):491-498.
[17]许玉兰,蔡年辉,吴裕,等.几种风吹楠属植物脂肪酸成分分析[J].中国油脂,2012,37(5):80-82.
[18]薛宝金,方真.风吹楠种子油萃取工艺研究及其脂肪酸成分分析[J].天然产物研究与开发,2012(S1):110-113.
[19]吴裕,段安安,田耀华,等.云南野生珍稀油料树种琴叶风吹楠资源调查[J].广西植物,2011,31(2):217-221.
[20]蔡年辉,许玉兰,吴裕,等.贮藏对琴叶风吹楠脂肪酸含量及成分的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011,31(11):85-89.
[21]吴裕,许玉兰,田耀华,等.珍稀油料树种琴叶风吹楠果实和种子形态变异[J].植物研究,2011,31(1):4-8.
[22]蒋迎红,项文化,蒋燚,等.广西海南风吹楠群落区系组成、结构与特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(1):74-82.
[23]蒋迎红,项文化,何应会,等.极小种群海南风吹楠种群的数量特征及动态[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(8):66-71.
[24]张教林,曹坤芳.光照对两种热带雨林树种幼苗光合能力、热耗散和抗氧化系统的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(6):639-646.
[25]叶子飘.光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(6):727-740.
[26]彭莉霞,黄东兵,吴德,等.竹节树幼苗的光响应特性及其曲线最适模型选择[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(4):1-5.
[27]周多多,蒋少伟,吴桂林,等.不同水分条件下胡杨光响应曲线拟合模型比较[J].植物科学学报,2017,35(3):406-412.
[28]郑威,何琴飞,彭玉华,等.石漠化区银合欢林光响应曲线模型比较[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(2):23-29.
[29]张平,徐凤霞.滇南风吹楠花粉形态观察[J].广西植物,2011,31(3):328-331.
[30]冯玉龙,曹坤芳,冯志立,等.4种热带雨林树种幼苗比叶重、光合特性和暗呼吸对生长光环境的适应[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):901-910.
[31]舒枭,杨志玲,杨旭,等.不同种源厚朴叶片性状变异及幼苗生长量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2009,25(4):19-25.
[32]何海洋,彭方仁,张瑞,等.不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):19-25.
[2]殷谷丽,唐建维,杨成源,等.4种省藤属植物的光合特征与叶片性状及生长的相关性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(6):104-112.
[3]Craine J M,Froehle J,Tilman D G,et al.The relation-ships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients[J].Oikos,2001,93(2):274-285.
[4]Garnier E,Laurent G,Bellmann A,et al.Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits[J].New Phytologist,2001,152(1):69-83.
[5]Vendramini F,Díaz S,Gurvich D E,et al.Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species[J].New Phytologist,2002,154(1):147-157.
[6]崔西甜,袁凤辉,王安志,等.蒙古栎叶片光合作用随叶龄的变化及其与叶片功能性状的关系[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(11):3160-3167.
[7]刘曼霞.亚高寒草甸不同坡向植物光合生理和叶片形态差异[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8526-8536.
[8]刘超,武娴,王襄平,等.内蒙古灌木叶性状关系及不同尺度的比较[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(6):23-29.
[9]Garnier E,Shipley B,Roumet C,et al.A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content[J].Functional Ecology,2001,15(5):688-695.
[10]Wilson P J,Thompson K,Hodgson J G.Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J].New Phytologist,1999,143(1):155-162.
[11]Murchie E H,Horton P.Contrasting patterns of photosynthetic acclimation to the light environment are dependent on the differential expression of the responses to altered irradiance and spectral quality[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,1998,21(2):139-148.
[12]Wang R Z.Photosynthesis,transpiration,and water use efficiency of vegetative and reproductive shoots of grassland species from north-eastern China[J].Photosynthetica,2001,39(4):569-573.
[13]Sauquet H.Androecium diversity and evolution in Myristicaceae(Magnoliales),with a description of a new Malagasy genus,Doyleanthus gennov[J].American Journal of Botany,2003,90(9):1293-1305.
[14]Sauquet H,Doyle J A,Scharaschkin T,et al.Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets:implications for character evolution[J].Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,2003,142(2):125-186.
[15]蒋英,李秉滔.中国植物志:第30卷[M].北京:科学出版社,1979.
[16]张平,徐凤霞.肉豆蔻科(Myristicaceae)3属国产种类的叶表皮形态观察[J].电子显微学报,2010,29(5):491-498.
[17]许玉兰,蔡年辉,吴裕,等.几种风吹楠属植物脂肪酸成分分析[J].中国油脂,2012,37(5):80-82.
[18]薛宝金,方真.风吹楠种子油萃取工艺研究及其脂肪酸成分分析[J].天然产物研究与开发,2012(S1):110-113.
[19]吴裕,段安安,田耀华,等.云南野生珍稀油料树种琴叶风吹楠资源调查[J].广西植物,2011,31(2):217-221.
[20]蔡年辉,许玉兰,吴裕,等.贮藏对琴叶风吹楠脂肪酸含量及成分的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011,31(11):85-89.
[21]吴裕,许玉兰,田耀华,等.珍稀油料树种琴叶风吹楠果实和种子形态变异[J].植物研究,2011,31(1):4-8.
[22]蒋迎红,项文化,蒋燚,等.广西海南风吹楠群落区系组成、结构与特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(1):74-82.
[23]蒋迎红,项文化,何应会,等.极小种群海南风吹楠种群的数量特征及动态[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(8):66-71.
[24]张教林,曹坤芳.光照对两种热带雨林树种幼苗光合能力、热耗散和抗氧化系统的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(6):639-646.
[25]叶子飘.光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(6):727-740.
[26]彭莉霞,黄东兵,吴德,等.竹节树幼苗的光响应特性及其曲线最适模型选择[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(4):1-5.
[27]周多多,蒋少伟,吴桂林,等.不同水分条件下胡杨光响应曲线拟合模型比较[J].植物科学学报,2017,35(3):406-412.
[28]郑威,何琴飞,彭玉华,等.石漠化区银合欢林光响应曲线模型比较[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(2):23-29.
[29]张平,徐凤霞.滇南风吹楠花粉形态观察[J].广西植物,2011,31(3):328-331.
[30]冯玉龙,曹坤芳,冯志立,等.4种热带雨林树种幼苗比叶重、光合特性和暗呼吸对生长光环境的适应[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):901-910.
[31]舒枭,杨志玲,杨旭,等.不同种源厚朴叶片性状变异及幼苗生长量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2009,25(4):19-25.
[32]何海洋,彭方仁,张瑞,等.不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(4):19-25.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |