用户名: 密码: 验证码:
土地混合利用测度研究进展
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research Progress on the Measurement of Mixed Land Use
  • 作者:郑红玉 ; 黄建洪 ; 卓跃飞 ; 徐忠国
  • 英文作者:ZHENG Hongyu;HUANG Jianhong;ZHUO Yuefei;XU Zhongguo;School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University;Collaborative Innovation Center for New-type Urbanization and Social Governance;School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University;Land Academy for National Development Zhejiang University;
  • 关键词:土地利用 ; 土地混合利用 ; 概念内涵 ; 测度维度 ; 方法指标 ; 信效度
  • 英文关键词:land use;;mixed land use;;concept connotation;;measure dimension;;method index;;reliability and validity
  • 中文刊名:中国土地科学
  • 英文刊名:China Land Science
  • 机构:苏州大学政治与公共管理学院;江苏高校新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心;浙江大学公共管理学院;浙江大学土地与国家发展研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15
  • 出版单位:中国土地科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:东吴智库重大专项“开发区转型升级中的体制改革与机制创新研究”(MZ33710217);; 苏州大学人文社会科学优秀学术团队“新型城镇化与乡村振兴研究”(MZ33700618);; 江苏省社会科学基金项目“公共供求视域中自贸试验区改革的制度创新机理研究”(17ZZB005)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:97-106
  • 页数:10
  • CN:11-2640/F
  • ISSN:1001-8158
  • 分类号:F301.24
摘要
研究目的:系统梳理土地混合利用测度的国内外研究成果,探讨未来研究的重点方向,推进土地混合利用从定性向定性与定量的综合发展。研究方法:文献研究法,归纳分析法。按照"内涵辨析—维度依据—方法指标—结果评价"的逻辑进行梳理。研究结果:(1)国内外尚未形成统一的混合内涵体系;(2)测度基于数量规模、空间结构、功能关系、多维综合4种维度展开,以数量或结构的单一维度为主,对功能关系探讨不足且缺乏综合视角;(3)香农熵等多样性相关指标是最常用的测度方法,说明目前研究较易忽视土地用途间的结构配置、功能互补等问题;(4)测度结果注重空间评价,信效度等数理分析欠缺。研究结论:未来应尝试探索系统综合的测度体系,可基于现有测度研究强化或推进平面立体综合测度、混合评价研究、时空地理规律及其影响机理探寻等方面的探索。
        The purpose of this paper is to systematically sort out the research results of mixed land use measurement,to discuss the key directions of future research, and to promote the transformation of mixed land use from qualitative to comprehensive development. The methods of literature review and inductive analysis are employed. This paper reviews the main research progress of mixed land use measurement by the logic of "connotation clarification-measurement dimension-method index-result evaluation". The results show that: 1)there is no unified mixed connotation system;2)there are four dimensions of mixed land use measurement, namely, quantitative scale,; spatial structure, functional relationship and multi-dimensional comprehensive measure, whereas the existing measurement methods lack comprehensive perspective; 3)the diversity related indexes, such as entropy Index is the most commonly used, suggesting that current studies tend to ignore structural allocation and functional complementarity; 4)the measurement results pay attention to spatial expression, lacking the research for reliability and validity analysis. In the future, the innovative and comprehensive measurement system should be explored. Furthermore, the following research should be strengthened or promoted, including comprehensive measurement, evaluation research, geographical regularity and its effect mechanism and so on.
引文
[1]HERNDON J D.Mixed-use development in theory and practice:learning from Atlanta’s mixed wxperiences[D].Atlanta:Georgia Institute of Technology,2011:3.
    [2]海道清信.紧凑型城市的规划与设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011:149-244.
    [3]加勒特·哈丁.生活在极限之内:生态学经济学和人口禁忌[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2001:7-22.
    [4]黄亚平.城市空间理论与空间分析[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2002:57-173.
    [5]玛丽娜·阿尔贝蒂.城市生态学新发展:城市生态系统中人类与生态过程的一体化整合[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2016:80-213.
    [6]朱晓青.混合功能人居:“产住共同体”聚落的演进、机理与建构[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014:13-42.
    [7]范文莉.当代城市空间发展的前瞻性理论与设计:城市要素有机结合的城市设计[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2011:3-59.
    [8]ROWLEY A.Mixed-use development:ambiguous concept,simplistic analysis and wishful thinking?[J].Planning Practice&Research,1996,11(1):85-98.
    [9]HOPPENBROUWER E,LOUW E.Mixed-use development:theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands[J].European Planning Studies,2005,13(7):967-983.
    [10]SCHWANKE D.Mixed-use development handbook[M].London:Urban Land Inst,2003.
    [11]NIEMIRA M P.The concept and drivers of mixed-use development:insights from a cross-organizational membership survey[J].Research Review,2007,4(1):53-56.
    [12]JACOBS J.The death and life of great American cities the failure of town planning[M].London:Pimlico,1961:100-135.
    [13]HANDY S L,BOARNET M G,EWING R,et.al.How the built environment affects physical activity:views from urban planning[J].American Journal of Preventive Medicine,2002,23(2 Suppl):64-73.
    [14]ANGOTTI T,HANHARDT E.Problems and prospects for healthy mixed-use communities in New York City[J].Planning Practice and Research,2001,16(2):145-154.
    [15]SCHWANKE D,SMART E,KESSLER H J.Looking at MXD’s[J].Urban Land,1986,45:12-20.
    [16]GRANT J.Mixed use in theory and practice:Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle[J].Journal of the American Planning Association,2002,68(1):71-84.
    [17]黄毅.城市混合功能建设研究--以上海为例[D].上海:同济大学,2008:421.
    [18]鲍其隽,姜耀明.城市中央商务区的混合使用与开发[J].城市问题,2007(9):52-56.
    [19]黄鹭新.香港特区的混合用途与法定规划[J].国外城市规划,2002(6):49-52.
    [20]VORONTSOVA A V,VORONTSOVA V L,SALIMGAREEVD V.The development of urban areas and spaces with the mixed functional use[J].Procedia Engineering,2016,150:1996-2000.
    [21]许思扬,陈振光.混合功能发展概念解读与分类探讨[J].规划师,2012,28(7):105-109.
    [22]黄毅.上海城市混合功能开发的机遇与挑战[J].城市问题,2008(3):35-37.
    [23]文雯.阿姆斯特丹混合使用开发的规划实践[J].国际城市规划,2016,31(4):105-109.
    [24]郑红玉,吴次芳,郑盛,等.空间一致性视角下的城市紧凑发展与土地混合利用研究--以上海市为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(4):35-42.
    [25]邢琰.规划单元开发中的土地混合使用规律及对中国建设的启示[D].北京:清华大学,2005:6-8.
    [26]郑红玉,吴次芳,沈孝强.土地混合利用研究评述及框架体系构建[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):157-164.
    [27]POPOVEC J D.Chains gang[J].Retail Traffic,2006,3(10):253-256.
    [28]LAGENDIJK A.Regional learning between variation and convergence:the concept of‘Mixed Land-Use’in regional spatial planning in The Netherlands[J].Canadian Journal of Regional Science,2001,24:81-100.
    [29]SONG Y,MERLIN L,RODRIGUEZ D.Comparing measures of urban land use mix[J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2013,42:1-13.
    [30]BORDOLOI R,MOTE A,SARKAR P P,et al.Quantification of land use diversity in the context of mixed land use[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,104:563-572.
    [31]EWING R,CERVERO R.Travel and the built environment:a meta-analysis[J].Journal of the American planning association,2010,76(3):265-294.
    [32]LESLIE E,COFFEE N,FRANK L,et al.Walkability of local communities:using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes[J].Health&place,2007,13(1):111-122.
    [33]ABDULLAHI S,PRADHAN B.GIS-based modeling for the spatial measurement and evaluation of mixed land use development for a compact city[J].GIScience&Remote Sensing,2015,52(1):18-39.
    [34]陈亮全.台北市土地混合使用适宜尺度之研究[R].台北:台北市政府工务局都市计划处委托国立台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所研究报告,1989:1-10.
    [35]SAELENS B E,SALLIS J F,FRANK L D.Environmental correlates of walking and cycling:findings from the transportation,urban design,and planning literatures[J].Annals of Behavioral Medicine A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine,2003,25(2):80-91.
    [36]MANAUGH K,KREIDER T.What is mixed use?Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix[J].Journal of Transport&Land Use,2013,6(1):63-72.
    [37]TALEAI M,SHARIFI A,SLIUZAS R,et.al.Evaluating the compatibility of multi-functional and intensive urban land uses[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2007,9(4):375-391.
    [38]BURTON E.Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,2002,29:219-250.
    [39]BOARNET M G,SARMIENTO S.Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour?A study of the link between nonwork travel and land-use characteristics[J].Urban Studies,1998,35(7):1155-1169.
    [40]CRANE R,CREPEAU R.Does neighborhood design influence travel?:a behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data[J].Transportation Research,1998,3(4):225-238.
    [41]BOADEN B G.Choosing the optimal land use mix:a LP/DCFModel[J].Urban Studies,1977,2(14):207-210.
    [42]HOEK J W.The MXI(Mixed-use Index):an instrument for anti-sprawl policy?[C]//44th ISOCARP Congress,2008:1-12.
    [43]KONG H,SUI D Z,TONG X,et.al.Paths to mixed-use development:a case study of Southern Changping in Beijing,China[J].Cities,2015,44:94-103.
    [44]SHI B,YANG J.Scale,distribution,and pattern of mixed land use in central districts:a case study of Nanjing,China[J].Habitat International,2015,46:166-177.
    [45]CERVERO R,KOCKELMAN K.Travel demand and the 3Ds:density,diversity,and design[J].Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment,1997,2(3):199-219.
    [46]ECK J R V,KOOMEN E.Characterising urban concentration and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use[J].Annals of Regional Science,2008,42(1):123-140.
    [47]MERCADO R,P EZ A.Determinants of distance traveled with a focus on the elderly:a multilevel analysis in the Hamilton CMA,Canada[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2009,17(1):65-76.
    [48]COMER D,GREENE J S.The development and application of a land use diversity index for Oklahoma City,OK[J].Applied Geography,2015,60:46-57.
    [49]黄书伟.土地混合使用空间型态量测与其影响因素之研究[D].台南:台湾国立成功大学,2008:105-107.
    [50]包宇.城市土地混合利用测度研究--以深圳市为例[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(22):5794-5797,5801.
    [51]钱林波.城市土地利用混合程度与居民出行空间分布--以南京主城为例[J].现代城市研究,2000(3):7-10,63.
    [52]林红,李军.出行空间分布与土地利用混合程度关系研究--以广州中心片区为例[J].城市规划,2008,32(9):53-56.
    [53]党云晓,董冠鹏,余建辉,等.北京土地利用混合度对居民职住分离的影响[J].地理学报,2015,70(6):919-930.
    [54]李俊芳,姚敏峰,季峰,等.土地利用混合度对轨道交通车站客流的影响[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(9):1415-1423.
    [55]HANDY S L.Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior[J].Journal of Planning Education and Research,1996,15(3):183-198.
    [56]蔡育新,王大立,刘小兰.土地混合使用对住宅价格的影响:解析混合使用、密度与可及性[J].都市与计划,2011,38(2):119-146.
    [57]TALEN E.Land use zoning and human diversity:exploring the connection[J].Journal of Urban Planning and Development,2005,131(4):214-232.
    [58]林峰田.空间混合度之准碎形指标[J].建筑与城乡研究学报,1991,6:9-17.
    [59]周倚臣.碎形理论应用于台南市土地混合使用特性分析之研究[D].台东:国立台东大学区域政策与发展研究所,2008:45-47.
    [60]冯红霞,张生瑞.基于元分维理论的土地利用混合度研究--以榆林空港生态城控规为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,46(6):882-887.
    [61]林如珍.以准碎形空间混合度指标探讨都市土地使用形态的自我组织--整体空间发展受限模式之应用[D].台中:国立中兴大学都市计划研究所,1998:1-8.
    [62]IRWIN E G,BOCKSTAEL N E.Land use externalities,open space preservation,and urban sprawl[J].Regional Science&Urban Economics,2004,34(6):705-725.
    [63]钟力.混合使用型住区的规划设计研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011:52-97.
    [64]CAO T V,CORY D C.Mixed land uses,land-use externalities,and residential property values:a reevaluation[J].The Annals of Regional Science,1982,16(1):1-24.
    [65]姜涛,李延新,秦涛.武汉市规划用地兼容性规定研究[J].城市规划,2014,38(6):38-42.
    [66]贺炜.城市用地兼容性确定方法研究--以佛山市禅城区环市童装产业综合发展区规划为例[J].规划师,2006(6):41-44.
    [67]TIAN L,LIANG Y L,ZHANG B.Measuring residential and industrial land use mix in the peri-urban areas of China[J].Land Use Policy,2017,69:427-438.
    [68]ZHUO Y,ZHENG H,WU C,et al.Compatibility mix degree index:a novel measure to characterize urban land use mix pattern[J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2019,75:49-60.
    [69]SONG Y,KNAAP G J.Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2004,34(6):663-680.
    [70]NABIL N A,ELDAYEM G E A.Influence of mixed landuse on realizing the social capital[J].HBRC Journal,2015,11(2):285-298.
    [71]MALEKI M Z,ZAIN M F M,ISMAIL A.Variables communalities and dependence to factors of street system,density,and mixed land use in sustainable site design[J].Sustainable Cities and Society,2012,3:46-53.
    [72]WHEATON W C.Commuting,congestion,and employment dispersal in cities with mixed land use[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2004,55(3):417-438.
    [73]ESCAMILLA J M,COS C C,C RDENAS J S.Contesting Mexico City’s alleged polycentric condition through a centrality-mixed land-use composite index[J].Urban Studies,2016,53(11):2380-2396.
    [74]吕力.管理案例研究的信效度分析:以AMJ年度最佳论文为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(12):19-29.
    [75]HAJNA S,DASGUPTA K,JOSEPH L,et al.A call for caution and transparency in the calculation of land use mix:measurement bias in the estimation of associations between land use mix and physical activity[J].Health&Place,2014,29:79-83.
    [76]IM H N,CHOI C G.The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index:clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix[J].Urban Studies,2018:1-17.
    (1)2016年上海市发布《上海市控制性详细规划技术准则(2016年修订版)》提出了用地混合引导表;2018年《上海市城市总体规划(2017—2035年)》鼓励工业用地的功能置换和混合使用等。
    (2)2017年深圳市修订的《深圳市城市规划标准与准则》鼓励土地混合使用,将其作为基础标准并明确土地用途混合使用指引。
    (1)混杂代表“不兼容”,即混杂程度越大,越不兼容,与本研究“混合”虽同使用“mixed”,但内涵表述相异,一般认为越兼容越混合,反之也成立。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700