用户名: 密码: 验证码:
市场化改革背景下中国城市污水治理效率研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation on the efficiency of urban wastewater governance in China under the market-oriented reform
  • 作者:李晓莉 ; 陈健
  • 英文作者:LI Xiaoli;CHEN Jian;Collaborative Innovation Center for 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road Studies,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Center for Merchants Research,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies;School of Finance,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies;
  • 关键词:城市污水治理效率 ; 数据包络分析 ; 效率测算
  • 英文关键词:efficiency of urban wastewater governance;;data envelopment analysis;;efficiency evaluation
  • 中文刊名:干旱区资源与环境
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
  • 机构:广东外语外贸大学21世纪海上丝绸之路协同创新中心广东外语外贸大学粤商研究中心;广东外语外贸大学金融学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-04
  • 出版单位:干旱区资源与环境
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:广东省自然科学基金项目“城市水务产业市场化改革绩效评价及提升路径研究:以城市污水处理产业为例”(2014A030310144);; 广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划学科共建项目“中国水务产业市场化模式、绩效与路径选择研究”(GD14XYJ13);; 广州市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划课题“公共治理视角下广州污水治理体系的建构研究”(14Y25);; 广东省哲学社会科学十二五规划学科共建项目“中国城市水务产业效率评价研究:基于跨国比较的视角”(GD15XYJ13)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:142-146
  • 页数:5
  • CN:15-1112/N
  • ISSN:1003-7578
  • 分类号:X703
摘要
文中运用数据包络分析法对2015年中国158个城市污水治理效率进行测算,发现中国城市污水治理效率差异较大,总体水平较低,呈现出超大城市和西部城市的污水治理效率较高,特大城市和中部城市的污水治理效率较低的分布特征。通过效率比较,发现城市污水治理效率略高于污水处理产业的除污效率,城市污水处理产业的除污效率低于产出效率。不同城市采用不同的治理模式导致了不同的治理效率,而城市对非市场化方式的重视和积极采用将会有助于提升城市污水治理的效率。
        In this paper the Data Envelopment Analysis was used to measure the efficiency of urban wastewater governance in 158 Chinese cities in 2015. The results of the study show that the efficiency of urban wastewater governance among cities were different,the average efficiency was very low,the average efficiency of megacity behemoths and western cities were the highest,and the average efficiency of megacities and central cities were the lowest. Comparing the efficiency,we found that the efficiency of wastewater governance was higher than the purification efficiency of wastewater treatment industry,and the purification efficiency of wastewater treatment industry was lower than the output efficiency. The reason showed that different cities took different governance pattern,which led to the different governance efficiency. Paying more attention to and actively adopting non-market methods are helpful to improve the efficiency of urban wastewater governance
引文
[1]Henrique C T,Marcelo R. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector:an empirical study[J]. Utilities Policy,2004,12(1):29-40.
    [2]Francesc H S,Ramón S G. Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes:a DEA approach[J]. Desalination,2009,249(1):230-234.
    [3]Andrea G,Giulia R and Alessandro I,Energy efficiency drivers in wastewater treatment plants:a double bootstrap DEA analysis[J]. Sustainability,2017,9(7):1126.
    [4]买亚宗,肖婉婷,石磊,马中,等.我国城镇污水处理厂运行效率评价[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(11):1789-1796.
    [5]李鑫,孙小霞,苏时鹏.基于DEA-Tobit模型的中国县域污水处理服务减排效率测评[J].资源科学,2017,39(3):451-460.
    [6]Charnes A,Cooper w w,Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1978(2):429-444.
    [7]Banker R D,Charnes A,Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science,1984(9):1078-1092.
    [8]Kaoru T,A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
    [9]Cooper W W,Seiford L M,Tone K. Data envelopment analysis:a comprehensive text with models,applications,references and DEA-Solver software 2nd.[M]. New York:Springer Science Business Media,2007.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700