基于模糊综合评价法的压砂地欧李品种筛选
|
摘要
以10种不同品种欧李为试材,在田间试验条件下,研究了其生长指标、叶绿素相对含量、产量以及果实品质;同时引入模糊综合评价法,构建产量、品质和生物学性状方面共10个因子的欧李品种综合效益评价体系,采用层次分析法(AHP)确定各评价因子的权重,结合隶属度函数及5个等级的评价矩阵,通过模糊综合评价数学模型计算得出不同品种压砂地欧李综合效益评价值,为压砂地欧李产业的发展提供参考依据。结果表明:水肥和栽培相同条件下,‘5号’的667m~2产量最高,‘4号’果实钙含量及其叶片叶绿素相对含量最高。10个品种欧李模糊综合效益值排序为‘6号’>‘07-14’>‘5号’>‘03-25’>‘4号’>‘7号’>‘S-D’>‘23-04’>‘03-35’>‘9号’。根据单因素分析结果,‘5号’和‘4号’具有较好的适应性。欧李坐果主要依靠异花授粉,根据模糊综合效益值排序,可选取‘6号’‘07-14’‘5号’欧李在压砂地种植。
Under the field experiment condition,taking 10 different varieties(lines)of three-years Cerasus humilis as the test materials,the plant height,stem diameter,chlorophyll relative content,yield and fruit quality of them were researched and analyzed.And the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was introduced at the same time.The comprehensive benefits evaluation system of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis in gravel-mulched field was build with 10 indexes which were included in yield,quality and biological characteristics.Then,the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)to definite the weight of each evaluation index was adopted,and the membership function as well as the evaluation matrix of five levels was combined.Finally,the comprehensive benefits evaluation values of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis in gravel-mulched field was calculated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation mathematics model,in order to provide theoretical basis and technical support to the development of the Cerasus humilis as well as gravel-mulched field industry.The results showed that the 'No.5'had the best yield in 10 varieties(lines),'No.4'had the highest calcium content of its fruit and the chlorophyll relative content of its blade in the same condition.Ranking the comprehensive benefits evaluation values of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis,'No.6'was the best,following the '07-14''No.5''03-25 ''No.4''No.7''S-D',then was the'23-04''03-35',the worst was'No.9'.According to the analysis results of single factor,the'No.5'and'No.4'had better adaptation in gravel-mulched field.The Cerasus humilis bear fruits depened on alienation pollination,the'No.6''07-14'and 'No.5'were selected to plant in gravel-mulched field depend on the rank of fuzzy comprehensive benefits.
Under the field experiment condition,taking 10 different varieties(lines)of three-years Cerasus humilis as the test materials,the plant height,stem diameter,chlorophyll relative content,yield and fruit quality of them were researched and analyzed.And the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was introduced at the same time.The comprehensive benefits evaluation system of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis in gravel-mulched field was build with 10 indexes which were included in yield,quality and biological characteristics.Then,the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)to definite the weight of each evaluation index was adopted,and the membership function as well as the evaluation matrix of five levels was combined.Finally,the comprehensive benefits evaluation values of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis in gravel-mulched field was calculated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation mathematics model,in order to provide theoretical basis and technical support to the development of the Cerasus humilis as well as gravel-mulched field industry.The results showed that the 'No.5'had the best yield in 10 varieties(lines),'No.4'had the highest calcium content of its fruit and the chlorophyll relative content of its blade in the same condition.Ranking the comprehensive benefits evaluation values of the different varieties of Cerasus humilis,'No.6'was the best,following the '07-14''No.5''03-25 ''No.4''No.7''S-D',then was the'23-04''03-35',the worst was'No.9'.According to the analysis results of single factor,the'No.5'and'No.4'had better adaptation in gravel-mulched field.The Cerasus humilis bear fruits depened on alienation pollination,the'No.6''07-14'and 'No.5'were selected to plant in gravel-mulched field depend on the rank of fuzzy comprehensive benefits.
引文
[1]哈小丽,韩占江,梁继业.不同欧李品种(系)光合与水分利用特性比较[J].北方园艺,2017(2):7-11.
[2]周文才,巢军,孙颖,等.不同钙果品系引种试验[J].南方林业科学,2017,45(1):14-16,31.
[3]赵建成.钙果的种植与加工[M].太原:山西经济出版社,2014:1-21.
[4]开建荣,王晓静.不同压砂地龄土壤肥力及硒砂瓜品质分析[J].北方园艺,2017(3):168-172.
[5]边雅茹,田军仓.灌水量对压砂地欧李光合作用及产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2017(2):34-38.
[6]邢天钧.中卫香山地区压砂地引种欧李造林试验研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(4):18-19.
[7]李正祥.多品种比较试验用邓肯新复极差法的统计与分析方法[J].中国甜菜糖业,1983(2):16-18.
[8]唐启义.DPS数据处理系统[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2013:87-145.
[9]孙福东,魏凤荣.应用Excel巧解模糊综合评价法[J].统计与决策,2011(23):172-174.
[10]晋艳云,高万林,张晗,等.基于模糊综合评价法的玉米新品种种子价值评估[J].中国种业,2015(10):18-21.
[11]金彪,孙明艳,李海防.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的桂林“两江四湖”旅游景区植物景观评价[J].北方园艺,2017(1):203-207.
[12]孙明明,王秀芳,王梅,等.基于模糊综合评价法的河北省农业科技创新风险投资影响因素分析[J].北方园艺,2014(22):208-211.
[13]母冰洁,张世军,卜芳侠,等.韩城市欧李新品系引进试验[J].陕西林业科技,2016(4):41-45.
[14]李海潮,韦开卫,王斌,等.原子吸收法测定31种蔬菜水果中的微量元素含量[J].国外医学(医学地理分册),2013,34(3):187-190.
[2]周文才,巢军,孙颖,等.不同钙果品系引种试验[J].南方林业科学,2017,45(1):14-16,31.
[3]赵建成.钙果的种植与加工[M].太原:山西经济出版社,2014:1-21.
[4]开建荣,王晓静.不同压砂地龄土壤肥力及硒砂瓜品质分析[J].北方园艺,2017(3):168-172.
[5]边雅茹,田军仓.灌水量对压砂地欧李光合作用及产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2017(2):34-38.
[6]邢天钧.中卫香山地区压砂地引种欧李造林试验研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(4):18-19.
[7]李正祥.多品种比较试验用邓肯新复极差法的统计与分析方法[J].中国甜菜糖业,1983(2):16-18.
[8]唐启义.DPS数据处理系统[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2013:87-145.
[9]孙福东,魏凤荣.应用Excel巧解模糊综合评价法[J].统计与决策,2011(23):172-174.
[10]晋艳云,高万林,张晗,等.基于模糊综合评价法的玉米新品种种子价值评估[J].中国种业,2015(10):18-21.
[11]金彪,孙明艳,李海防.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的桂林“两江四湖”旅游景区植物景观评价[J].北方园艺,2017(1):203-207.
[12]孙明明,王秀芳,王梅,等.基于模糊综合评价法的河北省农业科技创新风险投资影响因素分析[J].北方园艺,2014(22):208-211.
[13]母冰洁,张世军,卜芳侠,等.韩城市欧李新品系引进试验[J].陕西林业科技,2016(4):41-45.
[14]李海潮,韦开卫,王斌,等.原子吸收法测定31种蔬菜水果中的微量元素含量[J].国外医学(医学地理分册),2013,34(3):187-190.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |