摘要
对比绝热变换和等温变换不同的工艺特点,采用PROII进行模拟,通过对比分析"等温+等温"和"绝热+等温+绝热"两种不同组合方式,在热量回收利用、催化剂耗量及设备造价等方面的差异,通过优劣对比确定最终方案,为工艺技术选择提供参考。
By comparing the different process characteristics of adiabatic transformation and isothermal transformation,PRO II was used to simulate the process.By comparing and analyzing the two different combination modes of "isothermal+isothermal" and "adi abatic+isothermal+adiabatic",the difference in heat recovery,catalyst consumption and equipment cost was determined,and the final scheme was determined by comparing the advantages and disadvantages,which provided a reference for process technology selection.
引文
[1]路海彬.变换工艺技术改造模拟与优化[D].上海:华东理工大学,2013.
[2]王毅.水煤浆加压气化合成氨装置CO变换反应设计[J].煤化工,2010,38(6):28-31.
[3]陈国平.Shell粉煤气化变换工艺的优化改造[J].化工设计,2016,26(5):6-16.
[4]孙铭绪.水煤浆气化生产甲醇配套变换工艺[J].化学工程,2011,39(11):99-102.
[5]郑青春.CO变换工艺的设计浅析[J].安徽化工,2011,37(5):52-54.
[6]纵秋云.粉煤气化“双高”原料气耐硫变换新工艺的工业应用[J].煤化工,2014,62(6):25-29.
[7]严义刚.王照成,李繁荣.CO变换工艺技术的发展趋势[J].化肥设计,2017,55(3):4-9.
[8]闫志者.耐硫变换技术的现状及展望[J].炼油技术与工程,2018,48(9):5-9.
[9]高小红.Co-Mo-K催化剂上COS、HCN转化率热力学分析[J].计算机与应化学,2014,31(9):1119-1121.