渗流固结耦合作用分析基坑土压力及变形计算
|
摘要
国内外岩土工作者对基坑工程的研究已取得了许多重要的成果,基坑工程乃至超深超大基坑在设计、施工上也积累了不少宝贵的经验。随着经济的发展,沿海地区的许多高大建筑只能修建在软土上,导致地基的地质条件变得比较恶劣;在软土区另一个显著的问题就是基坑开挖过程中当开挖面在地下水位以下时会伴随着降水问题。已有研究证明,土的卸荷可产生负的孔隙水压力。同时,基坑降水又会使地下水产生渗流,这两个因素会导致作用在地下连续墙上的土压力随时间产生变化。本课题将研究开挖卸荷产生的孔隙水压力的消散,以及渗流固结耦合作用等因素造成的土压力变化,并对固结效应在分析深基坑变形的方法做一定的探讨。提出考虑孔隙水压力固结、渗流等的土压力计算方法和地面沉降分析的方法。
在基坑开挖过程中,孔隙流体压力会逐渐降低,将土层内有效应力的变化,导致土体产生固结变形。土体的固结又造成土体的渗透性参数的变化。在系统归纳、总结前人研究成果的基础上,采用机理分析、算例比较,对经典土压力理论以及对考虑水土相互作用的土压力进行简单介绍和总结。在Prandtl理论基础上推导考虑渗流力的基坑的土压力的改进模型,并利用MATLAB编制适用的基坑挡土墙土压力程序,进行土压力非线性计算理论的研究。总结出一种能反映位移、时间效应的非线性土压力模型,同时系统开展基坑水土压力分布模式及大小的机理分析。并在渗流固结耦合理论的基础上,分析软土地区深基坑的变形特性,包括坑底隆起和周围地层沉降的性状及其影响因素。分析了工程降水对深基坑土体的预压加固作用,并开展对固结效应及挡墙变形引起的基坑变形的研究。并进行了基坑工程降水引起的地表沉降公式的推导。
同时用商用数值软件ABAQUS建立两个基坑模型,一个模型是基于总应力法不考虑水的作用,另一个是基于有效应力法考虑基坑降水的流固耦合模型。两者分析结果进行对比,得出基坑开挖降水过程中渗流固结对基坑水土压力和周围地面沉降、基坑底部回弹及地下连续墙变形的影响规律,基坑渗流、工程降水引起围护结构土水压力的变化及地下水对基坑工程支护结构上主、被动土压力的影响,并得出在计算土压力时候,渗流力不可忽略的结论。
So far Geotechnical engineers at home and abroad have made many important achievements on foundation pit. Precious design and construction experiences of excavation even ultra-deep and ultra-large foundation pit have also been accumulated. However, with economic developing, large quantity of tall buildings or some important structures have had to build on the soft soil in the areas of Coastal, which leads the foundation geological conditions to become worse. Another significant problem in the soft soil area is that the process of excavation accompanied with the dewatering problems when the excavated surface is under the underground water lever. It has been proved that the earth can produce negative pore water pressure when the pit is excavating and the soil mass excavation unloading. At the same time, dewatering in the pit will also bring about seepage of underground water; these two factors would lead the earth pressure changing over time on the concrete diaphragm wall. This paper deals with that dissipation of excess pore water pressure due to unloading effects which lead by the excavating, and earth pressure changes which is caused by the factors of seepage coupled with the consolidation also called Fluid-solid coupling effects. Do some researches on deformation law of foundation pit which is caused by consolidation. Based on the results, then to get the methods of calculating on the earth pressure and analysis the ground subsidence which considering the fluid-solid coupling effects.
In the process of excavation, pore fluid pressure will reduce gradually, and the effective stress in the soil will increase, which leads soil to consolidation settlement and deformation. The consolidation of soil in foundation pit will make the soil permeability change. The article concludes the foundation pit in system, sums up the results of precious studies on the basis of mechanism analysis, examples of comparison. And do a brief introduction and conclusion to the classic earth pressure which is considering fluid and soil interaction. Derivation improved model of the earth pressure which considering the seepage force in foundation pit base on the Prandtl theory. And prepare to use the MATLAB software to write the earth pressure programs for retaining wall in deep excavation, which is to calculate the nonlinear earth pressure in theoretical study. Then to sum up a non-linear model of earth pressure that can reflect displacement and time-effects. At the same time conducts distribution pattern and size of the water pressure and earth pressure in excavation. Based on theoretical analysis of coupling seepage with consolidation, this paper have been made analysis deformation which includes the pit bottom heaving and the character of settlement and its impact factor in deep excavation at the soft soil area. It analyzes the role of soil reinforcement due to the pre-pressure and changing of earth pressure on the retaining wall when dewaters in the foundation pit, and also construes undermine caused by seepage.While carries out the consolidation effects and deformation of the retaining wall in foundation pit. Do the surface subsidence formula derivation due to dewatering and exaction in the excavation works.
At the same time, using the general commercially software ABAQUS to found two pit models, one is based on the total stress theory without considering the role of water, another pit method is based on effective stress theory with considering the fluid-solid interaction effect due to dewatering and excavation. Comparison the two results which obtain by finite element analysis, receiving the changing disciplines of water-earth pressure, ground settlement surrounding the foundation pit, pit bottom heaving and the deformation of concrete diaphragm wall, which deduce by the effects of seepage coupled with consolidation during the process of foundation pit excavating accompanying with dewatering. And the change of the water pressure on the retaining structure and analysis active or passive earth pressure on the retaining structure which are also on the impact of groundwater seepage and pit supporting structure. Then get the conclusion is that the seepage force can not be ignored.
在基坑开挖过程中,孔隙流体压力会逐渐降低,将土层内有效应力的变化,导致土体产生固结变形。土体的固结又造成土体的渗透性参数的变化。在系统归纳、总结前人研究成果的基础上,采用机理分析、算例比较,对经典土压力理论以及对考虑水土相互作用的土压力进行简单介绍和总结。在Prandtl理论基础上推导考虑渗流力的基坑的土压力的改进模型,并利用MATLAB编制适用的基坑挡土墙土压力程序,进行土压力非线性计算理论的研究。总结出一种能反映位移、时间效应的非线性土压力模型,同时系统开展基坑水土压力分布模式及大小的机理分析。并在渗流固结耦合理论的基础上,分析软土地区深基坑的变形特性,包括坑底隆起和周围地层沉降的性状及其影响因素。分析了工程降水对深基坑土体的预压加固作用,并开展对固结效应及挡墙变形引起的基坑变形的研究。并进行了基坑工程降水引起的地表沉降公式的推导。
同时用商用数值软件ABAQUS建立两个基坑模型,一个模型是基于总应力法不考虑水的作用,另一个是基于有效应力法考虑基坑降水的流固耦合模型。两者分析结果进行对比,得出基坑开挖降水过程中渗流固结对基坑水土压力和周围地面沉降、基坑底部回弹及地下连续墙变形的影响规律,基坑渗流、工程降水引起围护结构土水压力的变化及地下水对基坑工程支护结构上主、被动土压力的影响,并得出在计算土压力时候,渗流力不可忽略的结论。
So far Geotechnical engineers at home and abroad have made many important achievements on foundation pit. Precious design and construction experiences of excavation even ultra-deep and ultra-large foundation pit have also been accumulated. However, with economic developing, large quantity of tall buildings or some important structures have had to build on the soft soil in the areas of Coastal, which leads the foundation geological conditions to become worse. Another significant problem in the soft soil area is that the process of excavation accompanied with the dewatering problems when the excavated surface is under the underground water lever. It has been proved that the earth can produce negative pore water pressure when the pit is excavating and the soil mass excavation unloading. At the same time, dewatering in the pit will also bring about seepage of underground water; these two factors would lead the earth pressure changing over time on the concrete diaphragm wall. This paper deals with that dissipation of excess pore water pressure due to unloading effects which lead by the excavating, and earth pressure changes which is caused by the factors of seepage coupled with the consolidation also called Fluid-solid coupling effects. Do some researches on deformation law of foundation pit which is caused by consolidation. Based on the results, then to get the methods of calculating on the earth pressure and analysis the ground subsidence which considering the fluid-solid coupling effects.
In the process of excavation, pore fluid pressure will reduce gradually, and the effective stress in the soil will increase, which leads soil to consolidation settlement and deformation. The consolidation of soil in foundation pit will make the soil permeability change. The article concludes the foundation pit in system, sums up the results of precious studies on the basis of mechanism analysis, examples of comparison. And do a brief introduction and conclusion to the classic earth pressure which is considering fluid and soil interaction. Derivation improved model of the earth pressure which considering the seepage force in foundation pit base on the Prandtl theory. And prepare to use the MATLAB software to write the earth pressure programs for retaining wall in deep excavation, which is to calculate the nonlinear earth pressure in theoretical study. Then to sum up a non-linear model of earth pressure that can reflect displacement and time-effects. At the same time conducts distribution pattern and size of the water pressure and earth pressure in excavation. Based on theoretical analysis of coupling seepage with consolidation, this paper have been made analysis deformation which includes the pit bottom heaving and the character of settlement and its impact factor in deep excavation at the soft soil area. It analyzes the role of soil reinforcement due to the pre-pressure and changing of earth pressure on the retaining wall when dewaters in the foundation pit, and also construes undermine caused by seepage.While carries out the consolidation effects and deformation of the retaining wall in foundation pit. Do the surface subsidence formula derivation due to dewatering and exaction in the excavation works.
At the same time, using the general commercially software ABAQUS to found two pit models, one is based on the total stress theory without considering the role of water, another pit method is based on effective stress theory with considering the fluid-solid interaction effect due to dewatering and excavation. Comparison the two results which obtain by finite element analysis, receiving the changing disciplines of water-earth pressure, ground settlement surrounding the foundation pit, pit bottom heaving and the deformation of concrete diaphragm wall, which deduce by the effects of seepage coupled with consolidation during the process of foundation pit excavating accompanying with dewatering. And the change of the water pressure on the retaining structure and analysis active or passive earth pressure on the retaining structure which are also on the impact of groundwater seepage and pit supporting structure. Then get the conclusion is that the seepage force can not be ignored.
引文
[1]郑刚,高等基础工程学[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2007
[2]王卫东,王建华,深基坑支护结构与主体结构相结合的设计、分析与实例[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,2007
[3]王曙光,深基坑支护事故处理经验录[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2004,1~17
[4]唐业清,李启民,崔江余,基坑工程事故分析与处理[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1999
[5]曾宪明,基坑和边坡事故警示录[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1999
[6]余志成,深基坑支护设计与施工[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1997
[7]黄院雄,刘国彬,软土有支护深基坑主动土压力研究[J],地下工程与隧道,2000,(3):7~11
[8]龚晓南,21世纪岩土工程发展展望[J],岩土工程学报,2000,22(2):238~242
[9]王修强,赵运臣,刘洪震,基坑施工引起的围护桩及周围土体变形分析[J],隧道建设,2005,25(1):7~10
[10]程斌,刘国彬,侯学渊,基坑工程施工对邻近建筑物及隧道的相互影响[J],工程力学,2000,6(z1):486~491
[11]李广信,关于有渗流情况下的土压力计算[J],地基处理,1998,9(1):57~58
[12]姜志强,孙树林,李磊,基坑开挖中土压力计算模型探讨[J],河海大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(3):303~306
[13]朱合华,桥本正,深基坑工程动态施工反演分析与变形预报[J],岩土工程学报,1998,20(4):30~35
[14]胡强,刘宁,李锦辉,超变形法及其在深基坑开挖中的应用[J],岩土工程技术,2003,(3):167~170
[15]朱合华,梁九承,大型深基坑动态施工反演及稳定性分析[J],建筑结构学报,2000,6(1):74~79
[16] J. L. Borges M. M. Fernandes。Analysis of A Braced Excavation In Soft Soils Considering The Consolidation Effect,Geotech Geol Eng (2007) 25:617~629
[17] J. C. Liu,W. B. Zhao, J. M. Zai, Research on seepage force influence on one-dimensional Consolidation [J] ,Unsaturated Soil, Seepage, and Environmental Geotechnics (GSP 148) ASCE (2006):203~209
[18] Zhen Fang,Jian-Hua Yin,Responses of Excess Pore Water Pressure in Soft Marine Clay around a Soil–Cement Column[J],INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS ? ASCE,2007:167~175
[19] Yin. J. H., Zhu. J. G,Elastic viscoplastic consolidation modelling and interpretation of pore-water pressure responses in clay underneath Tarsiut Island[J], Can. Geotech. 1999, 708~717
[20]李蓓,赵锡宏,一种考虑挡土墙变形的深基坑非线性土压力方法[J],岩土力学,2005,25(z2):453~458
[21]殷宗泽等,土工原理[M],北京,中国水利水电出版社,2007,311~350 22]杨晓,周冬梅,裘布依水井理论在基坑井点降水中的运用[J],四川建筑, 2007,5(1):275~279
[23]杨志峰,环境水力学原理[M],北京,北京师范大学出版社,2006,25~51
[24]孔亮,王媛,夏均民,非饱和流固耦合双重孔隙介质模型控制方程[J],西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(2):163~165
[25]刘广胜,赵维炳,朱国忠,固结、渗流和沉积控制方程研究[J],水利水运科学研究,1999,6(2):207~212
[26]吴林高,工程降水设计施工与基础基坑渗流理论[M],北京,人民交通出版社,2003
[27]李佩成,地下水非稳定渗流解析法[M],北京,科学技术出版社,1999,55~57
[28]黄涛,杨立中,山区隧道涌水量计算中的双场耦合作用研究[M],成都,西南交通大学出版社,2004,55~78
[29] VAZIRI H. H.,CHRISTIAN H. A.,Application of Terzaghi's consolidation theory to nearly saturated soils,Canadian geotechnical journal,1994,31(2):311~317
[30]周开茂,谢康和,应宏伟,来方勇,双面排水条件下未打穿竖井地基固结计算[J],浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(1):151~156
[31]Gibson R.E., Schiffman R.L., Cargill K.W. The Theory of one Dimensional Consolidation of Saturated Clays.Ⅱ.Finite Nonlinear Consolidation of Thick Homogeneous Layers[J],Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1981,18(2):311~317
[32]李广信,高等土力学[M],北京,清华大学出版社,2004,238~322
[33]Pane. V., Schiffman. R.L.,Permeability of clay suspensions[J],Geotechnique, London, England ,1997,47 (2) :273-288
[34]G Gibson, R.E., G.L., Hussey, M.J.L., The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays: I。Finite nonlinear consolidation of thin homogeneous layers[J],Geotechnical Journal,1967,17(3) :261-273
[35]薛世峰,仝兴华,岳伯谦,董波,地下流固耦合理论的研究进展及应用[J],石油大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(2):109~114
[36]谢新宇,饱和土体固结理论新进展[J],岩土工程学报,1997,19(4):30~38
[37]张志红,赵成刚,邓敏,非饱和土固结理论新进展[J],岩土力学,2005,26(4):667~672
[38]董平川,徐小荷,何顺利,流固耦合问题及研究进展[J],地质力学学报,1999,5(1):127~134
[39]沈珠江,用有限单元法计算软土地基的固结变形[J],水利水运科技情报,1977,3(1):7~23
[40]王媛,多孔介质渗流与应力的耦合计算方法[J],工程勘察, 1995,(2):33~37
[41]仵彦卿,柴军瑞,裂隙网络岩体三维渗流场与应力场耦合分析[J],西安理工大学学报,2000,16(1):1~5
[42]王晓鸿,仵彦卿,渗流场-应力场耦合分析[J],勘察科学技术,1998,(4):3~6
[43]陈庆中,冯星梅,应力场,渗流场和流场耦合系统定边值定初值问题的变分原理[J],岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(5):550~554
[44]刘建军,耿万东,群井开采条件下承压含水层渗流动态模拟[J],灌溉排水学报,2003,22(2):58~60
[45]杨志锡,叶为民,杨林德,基坑工程中应力场与渗流场直接耦合的有限元法[J],勘察科学技术,2001,(3):32~36
[46]李培超,徐献芝,孔祥言,非饱和多孔介质有效应力计算公式的理论研究[J],中国科学技术大学学报,2004,(z1):53~57
[47]沈珠江,张诚厚,张诚厚,两种结构性粘土的土工特性[J]水利水运科学研究, 1983,(4),43~47
[48]罗晓辉,深基坑渗流-应力耦合分析[J],工程勘察,1996,(6):37~41
[49] HSI J.P,SMALL J.C. , Application of a fully coupled method to the analysis of an excavation [J] , Japanese soils and foundation,1993,33(4):36~38
[50]Whittle A. J.,Hashash M. A., Whitman R. V.,Analysis of Deep Excavation in Boston [J] ,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1993, 119(1) :233~227
[51]陈页开,挡土墙上土压力的试验研究与数值分析:[博士学位论文D],杭州;浙江大学,2001
[52]王元战,李新国,陈楠楠,挡土墙主动土压力分布与侧压力系数[J],岩土力学,2005,26(7):57~58
[53]Schmidt B., Discussion on earth pressure at the rest related to stress history [J], Canadian Geotechnical Journal ,1996,3( 4):239~242
[54]王钊,邹维列,李广信,挡土结构上的土压力和水压力,岩土力学2003,24(2):143~150
[55]杨晓君,龚晓南,基坑开挖中考虑水压力的土压力计算,土木工程学报,1997,30(4):58~62
[56]杨光华,深基坑支护结构的实用计算方法及其应用[M],北京,地质出版社,2004
[57]顾晓鲁,钱鸿缙,刘惠珊,地基与基础[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,2003
[58]JiaChun LIANG, Study on the lateral soil pressure Distribution Behind a Rigid Retaining wall subjected to different displacement models Using FLAC [D],TAIWAN。Chun Yuan Christian University ,2003:69~101
[59]李广信,关于有渗流情况下的土压力计算[J],地基处理,1998,9(1):57~58
[60]魏汝龙,基坑内外的水压力和渗流力[J],岩土工程师,1998,10(1):23~25
[61]李广信,刘早云,考虑渗透力的基坑水土压力计算[J],工业建筑,2002,09(1):23~25
[62]张彬,深基坑水土压力共同作用试验研究与机理分析,[[博士学位论文D],武汉,武汉大学,2004
[63]李广信。深基坑支护结构上的水土压力的分算与合算。岩土工程学报,2000, 22(3):348~352。
[64]介玉新,揭冠周,李广信,二维渗流情况下朗肯与库伦土压力理论的比较分析[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20 (z1), 1103~1106
[65]WANG Y Z,Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall[J],Geotechnique,2000,50(1):83~88。
[66]徐日庆,龚晓南,杨林德,土的非线性抗剪强度及土压力计算[J],浙江大学学报,1997,31(z1):101~106
[67]许锡昌,土压力问题与基坑变形分析,[博士学位论文D],武汉,中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2004
[68]徐日庆,龚晓南,俞建霖,基坑开挖中土压力计算方法探讨[A],中国土木工程学会第八届土力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集[C],北京,1999,667~670
[69]张吾渝,基坑开挖中土压力计算方法探讨[D],杭州:浙江大学,1999
[70]梅国雄,宰金珉,徐建,考虑变形与时间效应的土压力计算方法研究[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(z1):1079~1082
[71]周小平,张永兴,利用统一强度理论求解条形地基极限承载力[J],重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2003,(11):109~112
[72]孙更生,郑大同,软土地基与地下工程[M],中国建筑工业出版社,1983
[73] Robert J. Schilling,应用数值方法使用MATLAB和C语言(英文版)[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2004
[74]武胜忠,方鹏飞,地面沉降的计算理论和方法[J],太原理工大学学报,2000,31(2):162~166
[75]谢康和,柳崇敏,应宏伟,杨伟,成层土中基坑开挖降水引起的地表沉降分析,浙江大学学报(工学版)2003,36(3):239~243
[76]吴兴龙,朱碧堂,深基坑开挖坑周围土体变形时空效应初探[J],土工基础,1999,13(3):5~8
[77]纪广强,董平,秦然,曹孝华,某深基坑开挖对周围环境影响的监测[J],水文地质工程地质,2002,(5):29~32
[78]Bowles J E, Physical and geotechnical properties of soils [M],Second Edition,New York,McGraw-Hill Book Company,1984,277~282
[79]胡其志,何世秀,杨雪强等,基坑降水引起地面沉降的分析[J],湖北工学院学报,2001,(1):66~69
[80]赵锡宏,陈志明,胡中雄等。高层建筑深基坑围护工程实践与分析[M],上海,同济大学出版社,1996
[81]马石城,基坑开挖的弹塑性与流变分析及其应用[D]湖南大学,2001
[82]冉启全,顾小芸,考虑流变特性的流固耦合地面沉降计算模型[J],中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998,9(2):99~103
[83]陈崇希,裴顺平,地下水开采地面沉降模型研究[J],水文地质工程地质,2001,(2):5~8
[84]李筱艳,考虑耦合作用的深基坑土体变形预测[J],岩土工程技术,2003,(3):138~141
[85]侯学渊,基坑回弹与再压缩性状分析与预估[C],北京,第六届土力学及基础工程学术会议论文集,1991,295~298
[86]孙钧,黄伟,岩石力学参数弹塑性反演的优化方法.岩石力学与工程学报,1992,11(3):221~229
[87]侯学渊,陈永福,深基坑开挖引起周围地基土沉陷的计算[J],岩土工程师,1989,1(1):1~13
[88]于怀昌,刘汉东,丁仁伟,深基坑降水过程中周围建筑物沉降的系统预测[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2004,(22):1057~1062
[89]平扬,白世伟,深基坑工程渗流-应力耦合分析数值模拟研究[J],岩土力学,2001,22(1):37~41
[90]张在明,孙保卫,徐宏声,地下水赋存状态与渗流特征对基坑抗浮的影响[J],土木工程学报,2001,34(1):73~78
[91]陈立宏,陈祖煜,扩展剑桥模型参数的优化选择及其应用[J],岩土力学,2003,24(2):229~232 [92 Manuel Pastor and Claudio Tamagnini, Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics [M],London,Kogan Page Science,2004,187~232
[93]石亦平,周玉蓉,ABAQUS有限元分析实例详解[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2006
[2]王卫东,王建华,深基坑支护结构与主体结构相结合的设计、分析与实例[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,2007
[3]王曙光,深基坑支护事故处理经验录[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2004,1~17
[4]唐业清,李启民,崔江余,基坑工程事故分析与处理[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1999
[5]曾宪明,基坑和边坡事故警示录[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1999
[6]余志成,深基坑支护设计与施工[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1997
[7]黄院雄,刘国彬,软土有支护深基坑主动土压力研究[J],地下工程与隧道,2000,(3):7~11
[8]龚晓南,21世纪岩土工程发展展望[J],岩土工程学报,2000,22(2):238~242
[9]王修强,赵运臣,刘洪震,基坑施工引起的围护桩及周围土体变形分析[J],隧道建设,2005,25(1):7~10
[10]程斌,刘国彬,侯学渊,基坑工程施工对邻近建筑物及隧道的相互影响[J],工程力学,2000,6(z1):486~491
[11]李广信,关于有渗流情况下的土压力计算[J],地基处理,1998,9(1):57~58
[12]姜志强,孙树林,李磊,基坑开挖中土压力计算模型探讨[J],河海大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(3):303~306
[13]朱合华,桥本正,深基坑工程动态施工反演分析与变形预报[J],岩土工程学报,1998,20(4):30~35
[14]胡强,刘宁,李锦辉,超变形法及其在深基坑开挖中的应用[J],岩土工程技术,2003,(3):167~170
[15]朱合华,梁九承,大型深基坑动态施工反演及稳定性分析[J],建筑结构学报,2000,6(1):74~79
[16] J. L. Borges M. M. Fernandes。Analysis of A Braced Excavation In Soft Soils Considering The Consolidation Effect,Geotech Geol Eng (2007) 25:617~629
[17] J. C. Liu,W. B. Zhao, J. M. Zai, Research on seepage force influence on one-dimensional Consolidation [J] ,Unsaturated Soil, Seepage, and Environmental Geotechnics (GSP 148) ASCE (2006):203~209
[18] Zhen Fang,Jian-Hua Yin,Responses of Excess Pore Water Pressure in Soft Marine Clay around a Soil–Cement Column[J],INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS ? ASCE,2007:167~175
[19] Yin. J. H., Zhu. J. G,Elastic viscoplastic consolidation modelling and interpretation of pore-water pressure responses in clay underneath Tarsiut Island[J], Can. Geotech. 1999, 708~717
[20]李蓓,赵锡宏,一种考虑挡土墙变形的深基坑非线性土压力方法[J],岩土力学,2005,25(z2):453~458
[21]殷宗泽等,土工原理[M],北京,中国水利水电出版社,2007,311~350 22]杨晓,周冬梅,裘布依水井理论在基坑井点降水中的运用[J],四川建筑, 2007,5(1):275~279
[23]杨志峰,环境水力学原理[M],北京,北京师范大学出版社,2006,25~51
[24]孔亮,王媛,夏均民,非饱和流固耦合双重孔隙介质模型控制方程[J],西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(2):163~165
[25]刘广胜,赵维炳,朱国忠,固结、渗流和沉积控制方程研究[J],水利水运科学研究,1999,6(2):207~212
[26]吴林高,工程降水设计施工与基础基坑渗流理论[M],北京,人民交通出版社,2003
[27]李佩成,地下水非稳定渗流解析法[M],北京,科学技术出版社,1999,55~57
[28]黄涛,杨立中,山区隧道涌水量计算中的双场耦合作用研究[M],成都,西南交通大学出版社,2004,55~78
[29] VAZIRI H. H.,CHRISTIAN H. A.,Application of Terzaghi's consolidation theory to nearly saturated soils,Canadian geotechnical journal,1994,31(2):311~317
[30]周开茂,谢康和,应宏伟,来方勇,双面排水条件下未打穿竖井地基固结计算[J],浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(1):151~156
[31]Gibson R.E., Schiffman R.L., Cargill K.W. The Theory of one Dimensional Consolidation of Saturated Clays.Ⅱ.Finite Nonlinear Consolidation of Thick Homogeneous Layers[J],Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1981,18(2):311~317
[32]李广信,高等土力学[M],北京,清华大学出版社,2004,238~322
[33]Pane. V., Schiffman. R.L.,Permeability of clay suspensions[J],Geotechnique, London, England ,1997,47 (2) :273-288
[34]G Gibson, R.E., G.L., Hussey, M.J.L., The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays: I。Finite nonlinear consolidation of thin homogeneous layers[J],Geotechnical Journal,1967,17(3) :261-273
[35]薛世峰,仝兴华,岳伯谦,董波,地下流固耦合理论的研究进展及应用[J],石油大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(2):109~114
[36]谢新宇,饱和土体固结理论新进展[J],岩土工程学报,1997,19(4):30~38
[37]张志红,赵成刚,邓敏,非饱和土固结理论新进展[J],岩土力学,2005,26(4):667~672
[38]董平川,徐小荷,何顺利,流固耦合问题及研究进展[J],地质力学学报,1999,5(1):127~134
[39]沈珠江,用有限单元法计算软土地基的固结变形[J],水利水运科技情报,1977,3(1):7~23
[40]王媛,多孔介质渗流与应力的耦合计算方法[J],工程勘察, 1995,(2):33~37
[41]仵彦卿,柴军瑞,裂隙网络岩体三维渗流场与应力场耦合分析[J],西安理工大学学报,2000,16(1):1~5
[42]王晓鸿,仵彦卿,渗流场-应力场耦合分析[J],勘察科学技术,1998,(4):3~6
[43]陈庆中,冯星梅,应力场,渗流场和流场耦合系统定边值定初值问题的变分原理[J],岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(5):550~554
[44]刘建军,耿万东,群井开采条件下承压含水层渗流动态模拟[J],灌溉排水学报,2003,22(2):58~60
[45]杨志锡,叶为民,杨林德,基坑工程中应力场与渗流场直接耦合的有限元法[J],勘察科学技术,2001,(3):32~36
[46]李培超,徐献芝,孔祥言,非饱和多孔介质有效应力计算公式的理论研究[J],中国科学技术大学学报,2004,(z1):53~57
[47]沈珠江,张诚厚,张诚厚,两种结构性粘土的土工特性[J]水利水运科学研究, 1983,(4),43~47
[48]罗晓辉,深基坑渗流-应力耦合分析[J],工程勘察,1996,(6):37~41
[49] HSI J.P,SMALL J.C. , Application of a fully coupled method to the analysis of an excavation [J] , Japanese soils and foundation,1993,33(4):36~38
[50]Whittle A. J.,Hashash M. A., Whitman R. V.,Analysis of Deep Excavation in Boston [J] ,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1993, 119(1) :233~227
[51]陈页开,挡土墙上土压力的试验研究与数值分析:[博士学位论文D],杭州;浙江大学,2001
[52]王元战,李新国,陈楠楠,挡土墙主动土压力分布与侧压力系数[J],岩土力学,2005,26(7):57~58
[53]Schmidt B., Discussion on earth pressure at the rest related to stress history [J], Canadian Geotechnical Journal ,1996,3( 4):239~242
[54]王钊,邹维列,李广信,挡土结构上的土压力和水压力,岩土力学2003,24(2):143~150
[55]杨晓君,龚晓南,基坑开挖中考虑水压力的土压力计算,土木工程学报,1997,30(4):58~62
[56]杨光华,深基坑支护结构的实用计算方法及其应用[M],北京,地质出版社,2004
[57]顾晓鲁,钱鸿缙,刘惠珊,地基与基础[M],北京,中国建筑工业出版社,2003
[58]JiaChun LIANG, Study on the lateral soil pressure Distribution Behind a Rigid Retaining wall subjected to different displacement models Using FLAC [D],TAIWAN。Chun Yuan Christian University ,2003:69~101
[59]李广信,关于有渗流情况下的土压力计算[J],地基处理,1998,9(1):57~58
[60]魏汝龙,基坑内外的水压力和渗流力[J],岩土工程师,1998,10(1):23~25
[61]李广信,刘早云,考虑渗透力的基坑水土压力计算[J],工业建筑,2002,09(1):23~25
[62]张彬,深基坑水土压力共同作用试验研究与机理分析,[[博士学位论文D],武汉,武汉大学,2004
[63]李广信。深基坑支护结构上的水土压力的分算与合算。岩土工程学报,2000, 22(3):348~352。
[64]介玉新,揭冠周,李广信,二维渗流情况下朗肯与库伦土压力理论的比较分析[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20 (z1), 1103~1106
[65]WANG Y Z,Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall[J],Geotechnique,2000,50(1):83~88。
[66]徐日庆,龚晓南,杨林德,土的非线性抗剪强度及土压力计算[J],浙江大学学报,1997,31(z1):101~106
[67]许锡昌,土压力问题与基坑变形分析,[博士学位论文D],武汉,中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2004
[68]徐日庆,龚晓南,俞建霖,基坑开挖中土压力计算方法探讨[A],中国土木工程学会第八届土力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集[C],北京,1999,667~670
[69]张吾渝,基坑开挖中土压力计算方法探讨[D],杭州:浙江大学,1999
[70]梅国雄,宰金珉,徐建,考虑变形与时间效应的土压力计算方法研究[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(z1):1079~1082
[71]周小平,张永兴,利用统一强度理论求解条形地基极限承载力[J],重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2003,(11):109~112
[72]孙更生,郑大同,软土地基与地下工程[M],中国建筑工业出版社,1983
[73] Robert J. Schilling,应用数值方法使用MATLAB和C语言(英文版)[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2004
[74]武胜忠,方鹏飞,地面沉降的计算理论和方法[J],太原理工大学学报,2000,31(2):162~166
[75]谢康和,柳崇敏,应宏伟,杨伟,成层土中基坑开挖降水引起的地表沉降分析,浙江大学学报(工学版)2003,36(3):239~243
[76]吴兴龙,朱碧堂,深基坑开挖坑周围土体变形时空效应初探[J],土工基础,1999,13(3):5~8
[77]纪广强,董平,秦然,曹孝华,某深基坑开挖对周围环境影响的监测[J],水文地质工程地质,2002,(5):29~32
[78]Bowles J E, Physical and geotechnical properties of soils [M],Second Edition,New York,McGraw-Hill Book Company,1984,277~282
[79]胡其志,何世秀,杨雪强等,基坑降水引起地面沉降的分析[J],湖北工学院学报,2001,(1):66~69
[80]赵锡宏,陈志明,胡中雄等。高层建筑深基坑围护工程实践与分析[M],上海,同济大学出版社,1996
[81]马石城,基坑开挖的弹塑性与流变分析及其应用[D]湖南大学,2001
[82]冉启全,顾小芸,考虑流变特性的流固耦合地面沉降计算模型[J],中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998,9(2):99~103
[83]陈崇希,裴顺平,地下水开采地面沉降模型研究[J],水文地质工程地质,2001,(2):5~8
[84]李筱艳,考虑耦合作用的深基坑土体变形预测[J],岩土工程技术,2003,(3):138~141
[85]侯学渊,基坑回弹与再压缩性状分析与预估[C],北京,第六届土力学及基础工程学术会议论文集,1991,295~298
[86]孙钧,黄伟,岩石力学参数弹塑性反演的优化方法.岩石力学与工程学报,1992,11(3):221~229
[87]侯学渊,陈永福,深基坑开挖引起周围地基土沉陷的计算[J],岩土工程师,1989,1(1):1~13
[88]于怀昌,刘汉东,丁仁伟,深基坑降水过程中周围建筑物沉降的系统预测[J],岩石力学与工程学报,2004,(22):1057~1062
[89]平扬,白世伟,深基坑工程渗流-应力耦合分析数值模拟研究[J],岩土力学,2001,22(1):37~41
[90]张在明,孙保卫,徐宏声,地下水赋存状态与渗流特征对基坑抗浮的影响[J],土木工程学报,2001,34(1):73~78
[91]陈立宏,陈祖煜,扩展剑桥模型参数的优化选择及其应用[J],岩土力学,2003,24(2):229~232 [92 Manuel Pastor and Claudio Tamagnini, Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics [M],London,Kogan Page Science,2004,187~232
[93]石亦平,周玉蓉,ABAQUS有限元分析实例详解[M],北京,机械工业出版社,2006
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |