用户名: 密码: 验证码:
既有铁路地质灾害易发性区划及应急治理对策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着铁路建设工作的不断开展以及全球气候的不断恶化,地质灾害的频繁暴发为既有铁路的正常运营管理带来了重大的影响。本文以京广铁路、焦柳铁路、成昆铁路等铁路地质灾害调研资料为基础,在分析山区铁路地质灾害的类型及基本特征及其成因机理的基础上,对既有铁路沿线地质灾害的易发程度的区划方法进行研究,为既有铁路地质灾害的防治及提高既有铁路抗灾减灾能力提供依据,论文主要的研究工作如下:
     (1)在既有铁路地质灾害调研的基础上,对既有铁路地质灾害的分类特征进行详细的分析,在此基础上对既有铁路地质灾害的成因机理进行分析;
     (2)以衡广铁路沿线地质灾害为研究背景,根据既有铁路地质灾害的发育特征,采用模糊综合评价法及模糊聚类分析方法,对衡广线地质灾害典型发育地段进行易发性评价;
     (3)在既有铁路地质灾害易发性评价的基础上,对衡广铁路地质灾害典型发育地段地质灾害应急防御对策进行研究,为既有铁路地质灾害的防治提供参考。
With the development of the construction of the railway and the constantly depravation of the global climate, the continually erupt of the geo-hazard affect the normal management of the railroad system seriously. Base on survey data of the Jing-Guang railway, Jiao-Liu railway and the Chen-Kun railway, the present paper analyze the type, the character and cause of the railway geo-hazard, and research on the geo-hazard labile zoning along the railway. This provide the theory consult for the the railway department to enhance the capability of the prevention and the management to the geo-hazard. Base on the background , the present paper doing corresponding research and get some research fruits in the following aspects:
     Firstly, base on the field survey to the geo-hazard of the railway, the present paper analyses the type and the character of the geo-hazard, discuss the origin mechanism of the geo-hazard of the railway;
     Secondly, on the research background of the geo-hazard along the Heng-Guang railway, according to the develop character of the geo-hazard, the present paper introduce the fuzzy comprehensive assessing method and the fuzzy clustering assessing method, assessing the liable zoning of the geo-hazard along the Heng-Guang railway;
     Thirdly, base on the geo-hazard liable zoning of the railway, the present paper research on the emergency countermeasure to the typical geo-hazard along the Heng-Guang railway, in order to provide the consultant to the prevention to the geo-hazard of the railway.
引文
[1]铁道部.铁路“十五”提速计划及实施意见.中国铁路,2001,(9):7-14.
    [2]铁道部.国家《中长期铁路网规划》之规划方案、实施计划、舰划特点.铁道勘测与设计.2007年2期:61-63
    [3]罗元华,张梁,张业成.地质灾害风险评估方法.北京:地质出版社,1998
    [4]张梁,张业成,罗元华.地质灾害灾情评估理论与实践.北京:地质出版社,1998:1-417
    [5]刘希林.泥石流危险度判定的研究.灾害学,1988.3(3):10-15
    [6]Saito M.1969.Forecasting time of slope failure by tertiary creep[A].Proc seventh Int confon soil mech and found Eng[C].Montreal,667-683
    [7]Okimura T.A slop stability method for predicting rapid mass movements on granite mountain slops.Natural Disaster Science,1983,5(1):13-30
    [8]Smith T.C.A method for mapping relative susceptibility to debris flows,with an example from San Mateo County.Landslides,floods,and marine effects of the storm of January 3-5,1982,in the San Francisco Bay Region,California,Ellen.S.D.and G.F.Wieczorek,eds.,U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434,1988,185-194
    [9]Hollingsworth R.and G.S.Kovacs.Soil slumps and debris flows:Prediction and protection.Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists,1981,18(1):17-28
    [10]Peatross J.L.A morphometric study of slop stability controls in Central Virginia:[Masters Thesis].University of Virginia,1986.
    [11]Puente S.Social vulnerability to disasters in Mexico city.An assessment method.In:J.K.Mitchell(eds.).Crucibles of Hazard:Mega-Cities and Disasters in Transition.Tokyo:United Nations Press,1999,295-334
    [12]Devin L.B.and Hobba.L.J.Considerations for establishing flood mitigation priorities and the appropriate level of adjustment.Proceedings of the Floodplain Management Conference.Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service,1981,261-266
    [13]Penning-Rowsell E.P.Peerboite B.and Correia F.N.et al.Flood vulnerability analysis and climatic change towords a European methodology.In:A.J.Saul(eds.).Floods and Flood Management.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publisher,1992,343-361
    [14]谭炳炎.泥石流沟严重程度的数量化综合评判.水土保持通报,1986,6(1):51-57
    [15]刘希林.泥石流危险区划的探讨.灾害学,1989,(4):3-9
    [16]姚令侃.模糊相似选择在确定泥石流沟危险雨情区上的应用.水土保持通报,1986,6(6):21-30
    [17]陈景武.云东川蒋家沟泥石流暴发与暴雨关系的初步分析.中国科学院兰州冰川冻土研究所集刊.北京:科学出版社,1985,88-96
    [18]殷跃平,李嫒.区域地质灾害趋势预测理论与方法.工程地质学报,1996,4(4):75-79
    [19]姜云,王兰生.地理信息系统在山区城市地面岩体稳定性管理与控制中的应用.地质灾害与环境保护,1994,5(1):32-38
    [20]雷明堂,蒋小珍,李琦.地理信息系统(GIS)在岩溶塌陷评价中的运用.中国岩溶,1994,13(4):351-356
    [21]郑世书,孙亚军,赵林.GIS在殷庄煤矿微山湖采区工作面涌水预测中的应用.中国矿业大学学报,1994,23(2):48-56
    [22]艾山,岳天祥.再论泥石流流域系统的信息熵.水土保持学报,1998,2(4):1-7
    [23]刘希林.区域泥石流危险度评价研究进展.中国地质灾害与防治学报,2002,13(4):1-9
    [24]刘丽,王士革.滑坡、泥石流区域危险度二级模糊综合评判初探.自然灾害学报,1996,5(3):51-59
    [25]丁继新.滑坡和泥石流致灾条件叠合技术及风险分析——以川藏公路然乌至鲁朗段为例:[博士学位论文].北京:中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,2005
    [26]王明涛.多指标综合评价中权系数确定的一种综合分析方法.系统工程,1999,17(2):56-61
    [27]樊运晓,罗云,陈庆寿.区域承灾体脆弱性综合评价指标权重的确定.2001,16(1):85-87
    [28]高巍,张于心,邢俊义,等.铁路灾害中承灾体的易损性因素对风险度的修正.北方交通大学学报,1996,23(3):77-81
    [29]蒋忠信,陈光曦,吴宗俭等.中国山区道路灾害防治.重庆大学出版社,1994
    [30]怀化工务段防洪抢险预案.怀化工务段.2006
    [31]惠州工务段防洪抢险预案.惠州工务段.2006
    [32]成昆线防洪及地质灾害应急预案.成都铁路局防洪办公室.2006
    [33]崔伯恩.公路设施抗水毁能力评价与毁损等级划分方法研究.博士学位论文.同济大学。2006年7月
    [34]方向池,黄润秋.山区公路水毁灾害研究及治理.成都:四川大学出版社,2000
    [35]高兴和.地质灾害承灾体易损性探究.中国地质矿产经济,2002,4:28-31
    [36]许清涛.和龙市地质灾害分区与评价:[硕士学位论文].吉林:吉林大学,2004
    [37]魏海霞.滇西红层区地质灾害易发性评价研究——以云省永平县为例:[硕士学位论文].昆明:昆明理工大学,2007
    [38]傅卫东.地质灾害易发性区划研究与防治对策——以靖县为例:[硕士学位论文].武汉:中国地质大学,2005
    [39]王文俊,向喜琼,黄润秋.区域崩塌滑坡的易发性评价_以四川省珙县为例.中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,(14)2:31-38
    [40]张有全,宫辉力,李巧刚.基于GIS的北京市延庆县地质灾害易发性区域划分.中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,(17)4:17-24
    [41]周惠成,张改红,王国利.基于熵权的水库防洪调度多目标决策方法及应用.水利学报,2007,38(1):100-106
    [42]庞振凌,常红军,李玉英.层次分析法对水北调中线水源区的水质评价.生态学报,2008,28(4):1810-1819
    [43]邹翔,崔鹏等.灰色关联度法在泥石流活动性评价中的应用[J].山地学报,2003,21(3):360-364
    [44]喻湘存,熊曙初.系统工程教程.清华大学出版社,北京交通大学出版社,2006:220-227
    [45]余小宁,陈章.衡阳盆地红层水文地质特征及开发利用价值.湖科技学院学报,2007年9月:53-54
    [46]夏先华.衡阳市山洪灾害成因及防治措施.湖水利水电.2005年第05期:57-58
    [47]张大伟.铁路防洪对策.中国铁路,1998,2:7-12
    [48]闪淳昌,卢齐忠等.现代安全管理实务.北京:中国工人出版社,2003.4

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700