摘要
根据层面与坡面的相互关系,层状岩质边坡可分为水平坡、横向坡、顺向坡、反向坡四种基本类型。其中顺向层状岩质边坡发生滑坡较为普遍。随着工程建设的开展,顺层岩质斜坡问题愈趋突出,顺层斜坡变形失稳是最常见的岩质边坡工程问题。通常认为顺层岩质斜坡的变形破坏以滑移-拉裂、滑移-弯曲模式为特征。但结合野外调查和文献搜索,在陡倾顺层岩质边坡还发现一类特殊的变形破坏方式,即倾倒变形。但根据以往的经验表明,倾倒变形一般只出现在近于直立或反倾层状斜坡当中。顺层斜坡倾倒变形破坏的特性与反倾坡截然不同,因此有必要加强对顺层岩质斜坡倾倒变形破坏机制的研究。
本文以碧口近坝库区的两个典型滑坡为例,在阐明区内地质环境条件、滑坡的基本特征的基础上,研究了该类斜坡形成滑坡的基本特征要素和坡体结构特征;并应用数值模拟的手段对滑坡的成因机制以及各类控制因素对斜坡发生倾倒变形的影响规律进行了分析。通过上述研究,得出以下规律和结论:
(1)在详细调查这两个滑坡的地质环境条件、滑坡特征的基础上,深入地研究了滑坡的坡体结构特征与变形破坏特征,并且详细分析、总结了顺层岩质斜坡发生倾倒变形破坏的基本特征和坡体结构。
(2)在对白龙江碧口电站库区典型滑坡物质组成、结构特征以及成因机制等工程特性分析的基础上,恢复岸坡原始地貌,建立地质原型的三维模型。采用离散单元法对岸坡变形过程的各演化阶段进行了模拟。由此得出了陡倾顺层岩质斜坡的倾倒变形是在河谷演化、岸坡形成过程,岩层在平行坡面的最大主应力的作用下由坡体前缘开始向临空方向作悬臂梁弯曲,并逐渐发展到坡内,最终导致岩层在根部处折断,形成倾倒体。当坡体内折断带的剪应力超过其抗剪强度时,坡体将发生滑动形成滑坡。
(3)应用离散元法计算了孟家干沟坍滑体在地震动荷载作用下边坡的位移变形。模拟结果的位移经过与地震后的实测位移对比,结果表明模拟位移跟实际位移比较接近。
(4)在此基础上,利用三维离散元软件3DEC对顺层岩质斜坡的变形破坏规律进行数值模拟,通过逐一改变坡形、岩层倾角、坡度、坡高等条件来研究顺层斜坡倾倒变形的规律。分析结果可以得到:①较之凹形坡与平形坡,凸形坡更有利于斜坡的倾倒变形破坏。②一般来讲构成斜坡的岩层倾角在60°以上有利于倾倒变形的发生。③边坡的变形破坏程度随斜坡坡度的增大而增大。坡度高于30°是倾倒的优势坡度范围。④变形程度随着高度增加也跟着增加。在特定的地质环境条件下,当顺层斜坡的坡高>100m时,在层面倾角由45°变化到85°时,首先出现的是滑移-弯曲变形,逐渐发展到倾倒变形。数值模拟结果与实际斜坡倾倒变形情况相符。
According to the angle's relation of stratum and slope, the stratified rock slope can be divided into four parts: horizontal,transverse, reversal incline and bedding slope. Among these, the bedding slope is most likely to slide.Along with the development of the construction,the bedding rock slope problem is more extrude.The bedding rock slope’instabllity is the most familiar problem in rock slope engineering.Generally speaking,it is believed that slip-rupture and slip-bending are main characteristics of deformation and failure of bedding rock slope.However,based on the collection of systemic references and plenty of situ surveys,it is found that there is another particular form of deform ation and failure for steep bedding rock slope,namely,toppling deformation.On the basis of former experience,toppling deformation is one peculiar deformation mode belonging to reversal incline and vertical stratified slope .The bedding slopes are different from the counter-tilt slopes completely in mechanical properties. So it is necessary for us to do some research on the tilting deformation failure mechanism.
Taking two typical landslides of Bikou reservoir close to the dam for an example,on the basis of clarifying geological environment conditions in the region and basic characteristics factors of the landslides, this paper summarizes basic characteristics and structural characteristics of the bedding slopes where the landslides come into being,and the formation mechanism of the landslides and the rule of the effect of the factors controlling deformation of slope is been carried out mainly by numerical simulation.Through this research,the following rules and conclusions drawn:
(1)On the base of the detailed investigation of geological environment and basic characteristics factors of landslides,structural characteristics and deform ation and failure characteristics of landslides are deeply studied , and the basic characteristics and structural characteristics of the steep bedding rock slopes with toppling deformation are summarized and analyzed.
(2)Based on the analysis of material composition,structure characteristic genetic mechanism,and other engineering geological characteristics of landslides of Bikou reservoir in Bailong River,the 3D numerica1 models of the geological prototype are established by estimating the ancient topographic and morphologic characteristics and reinstating the glided mass.Using the Distinct Element Method to simulate each evolved stage in the deformation process of the slopes,the results showed that in the process of valley evolution and slope formation and under the maximum principal stress of slope,which is parallel to the surface of slope,rock stratum bends from frontal edge gradually to the inner part of the slope as a cantilever beam.At last its root will be broken off,and a toppling body comes into being. On condition that the maximum shear stress exceed the shear strength in the cracked zone of the slope,it will slide and landslide happens.
(3)The displacements of Meng Jiagangou landslide are calculated by distinct element method. Comparison between the simulation results and the field values of earthquake induced displacements shows that the displacements simulated by 3DEC are close to the field values.
(4)Then,the deformation and failure rule of slope is researched by the way of numerical simulating deformation and destruction of bedding rock slope with three-dimensional rogram of 3DEC.By taking into account and changing geometric shape,height and angle of bedding slope and angle of interface separately,the influences on toppling deformation of bedding slopes are analyzed. Finally get the following conclusions:①Compared with planar sloped and concave slope, the toppling deformation of convex slope is easier to happen.②In general,it is easy for rock stratum to topple over when bedding dip is more than 60°.③It aggravates slope deformation with the increase of the slope angle. It is more likely for stratum to topple at the condition of the slope angle above 30°.④The deformation increases with height. When the slope is higher than 100m with particular geological environment,bedding dip increasing from 45°to 85°,slope failure mode will transit from sliding-bendin mode to toppling mode.The calculated results accord with the situation of toppling deformation in situ .
引文
[1]郭长宝.滇藏铁路金沙江大桥高边坡稳定性数值模拟研究[A].第三届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集[C].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2009,386~392.
[2]长江水利委员会.三峡工程地质研究[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1997:102.
[3]廖秋林,李晓,李守定,董艳辉.三峡库区千将坪滑坡的发生、地质地貌特征、成因及滑坡判据研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(17):3146~3153.
[4]李守定,李晓,董艳辉,刘艳辉,吴疆.重庆万州吉安滑坡特征与成因研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(17):3159~3164.
[5]肖诗荣,刘德富,胡志宇.世界三大典型水库型顺层岩质滑坡工程地质比较研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):52~59.
[6]谢守益,徐卫亚.降雨诱发滑坡机制研究[J].武汉水利电力大学学报,1999,32(1):21~23.
[7]苗勇勤,徐小荷,孙志先,曹文忠,梁冰.抚顺西露天矿人车卷边坡失稳演变规律[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2000,19(4):340~343.
[8]施裕兵,李崇标,周波.西南某水电站右坝肩倾倒变形体发育特征及处理[J].四川水力发电,2006,25(6):77~79.
[9]胥良.金沙江白鹤滩水电站金江滑坡成因机制及稳定性研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2004.5.
[10]康胜.石阅子滑坡成因机制及稳定性研究[D].南州大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[11]薛德敏.西南地区典型巨型滑坡形成与复活机制研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010.6.
[12]陈海军.高陡岩质斜坡深层变形的数值分析.南京水利科学研究院博士学位论文,2002,6.
[13] Skempton A W&Hutchinson J N, 1969. Stability of natural slopes and embankment foundations, state-of-the-art report. In: Proc.7th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech and Foundn Engng,291-340.
[14] UNESCO,1993. Multilingual Landslide Glossary. The International Geotechnical Societies’UNESCO Working Party for World Landslide Inventory. Canada: BiTech Pubs.
[15] Varnes D J, 1958. Landslide types and processes. In: Eckel E B ed. Landslides and Engineering Practice. (USA) Highway Research Board, Spec. Rep. 29, 20-47.
[16] Varnes b J, 1978. Slope movements: type and processes. In: Eckel E B ed. Landslides Analysis and Control. Transp. Res. Board, Spec. Rep. 176, 11-33.
[17] Dikau R, Brunsden D, Schrott L,&Ibsen M-L, 1996. Landslide recognition:identification movement and courses. Report No.l of the European Commission Environment Programme Contract No. EV5V-CT94-D454. New York:John Wiley&Sons Ltd.
[18]黄润秋,许强.工程地质广义系统科学分析原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.
[19]张倬元,王士天,王兰生.工程地质分析原理[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.
[20]孙玉科,姚宝魁.我国岩质边坡变形破坏的主要地质模式[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1983.
[21]刘广润,徐开祥,卢峰虎.湖北西部山区采矿诱发岩崩滑坡的环境地质研究[J].宝石和宝石学杂志,1990.
[22]黄润秋.汶川8.0级地震触发崩滑灾害机制及其地质力学模式[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(6):1239~1249.
[23]陆兆臻.工程地质原理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001.
[24] FREITAS D M H, WATTERS R J. Some field examples of toppling failure[J]. Geotechnique, 1973, 23(4): 495~514.
[25] GOODMAN R E, BRAY J W. Toppling of rock slopes [C]//Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference, Rock Engineering for Foundations and Slopes, Vol.2. Colorado:Boulder, 1976: 201~234.
[26] BRABB E E, HARROD B L. Landslides: Extent and Economic Significance[M]. Rotterdam/Brookfield: Balkema,1989.
[27] CRUDEN D M, HU X Q. Topples on underdip slopes in the Highwood Pass, Alberta, Canada[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 1994, 27: 57~58.
[28]韩贝传,王思敬.边坡倾倒变形的形成机制与影响因素分析[J] .工程地质学报,1999,7(3):213~217.
[29]严明,陈剑平,黄润秋,张悼元,王士天.岩质边坡滑移-弯曲破坏中间状态的工程地质分析[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(11):41~44.
[30]巨能攀,赵建军,邓辉,黄润秋,段海澎.黄山高速滑移弯曲边坡变形机理分析及应急治理对策[J].地球科学进展,2008,23(5):474~481.
[31]冯文凯,何川,石豫川,鲍立新.复杂巨型滑坡形成机制三维离散元模拟分析[J].岩土力学,2009,30(4):1122~1126.
[32]刘钧.顺层边坡弯曲破坏的力学分析[J].工程地质学报,1997,5(4):335~339,356.
[33]任光明,李树森,聂德新,左三胜.顺层坡滑坡形成机制的物理模拟及力学分析[J].山地研究,1998,16(3):182~187.
[34]朱晗迓,马美玲,尚岳全.顺倾向层状岩质边坡溃屈破坏分析[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(9):1144~1149.
[35]聂德新,任光明,陈海军,尚岳全,赵福生等.溃屈型滑坡滑面强度特征及在稳定性预测中的意义—李家峡水电站初期蓄水水库滑坡预测成功原因分析[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1997,8(3):1~5.
[36]刘高,刘从友,王有林,张帆宇.黄河某水电站顺层岩质滑坡形成机理与演化过程[J].西北地震学报,2008,30(3):249~254.
[37]李叶,谢晓军,王明友.汉坪嘴水电站汉坪坝滑坡稳定分析[J].四川水利,2006:14~18.
[38]黄洪波,符文熹,尚岳全,聂德新.层状岩质边坡的屈曲破坏分析[J].山地学报,2003,21(3):96~100.
[39]陈自生.浅论拱溃型顺层岩质滑坡[J].山地研究,1991,9(4):231~235.
[40]孙国富,刘维宁,陶连金,张悼元.陡倾外层状岩石边坡的破坏机制与开挖模拟[J].岩土工程学报,2003,25(6):697~701.
[41]吕美君,晏鄂川.顺层边坡岩体结构稳定性分析[J].地球与环境,2005, 33(sup): 285-289.
[42]郭希哲,黄学斌,郭满长等.三峡工程库区崩滑地质灾害防治图册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
[43]魏玉峰,聂德新,吕生弟,杨永明,赵海营.溃曲软硬相间顺层斜坡滑移-弯曲破坏机制分析[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(3):287~291.
[44] Christopher R.J. Kilburn,David N. Petley. Forecasting giant,catastrophic slope collapse:lessons from Vajont,Northern Italy[J]. Geomorphology,2003,21-32.
[45]涂国祥,黄润秋.某水电站坝肩顺坡向变倾角岩质边坡变形破坏机制研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2005,32(3):278~283.
[46]任光明,夏敏,李果,刘昌,张富荣.陡倾顺层岩质斜坡倾倒变形破坏特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增1):3193~3200.
[47]夏敏,任光明,李果,吕生弟,刘荣清.陡倾顺层斜坡倾倒变形破坏的数值模拟研究[A].第三届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集[C].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2009,352~355.
[48]孙耀明,王运生.西南某电站引水线路滑坡特征及成因机制分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):305~308.
[49]尚景红.金川水电站边坡稳定性分析[D].兰州大学硕士学位论文,2009.6.
[50]王者涛.青川县城桅杆梁不稳定斜坡稳定性评价及其防治措施研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010.6.
[51]丁中开,张青宇,刘海,潘晟鹏.某库岸滑坡演化机制及稳定性预测[J].岩甘肃水利水电技术,2010,46(11):10~11.
[52]王士天,黄润秋,李渝生等.雅砻江锦屏水电站重大工程地质问题研究[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1998.
[53]黄润秋.20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(3):433—454.
[54] Naresh Kazi Tamrakar , Shuichiro Yokota , Osamu Osaka. A toppled structure with sliding in the Siwalik Hills,midwestern Nepal[J].Engineering Geology,2002,64(4):339~350.
[55] R.P. Mcaffee, D.M. Cruden. Landslides at Rock Glacier Site,Highwood Pass,Alberta[J].Can. Geotech,1996,33:685~695.
[56]陈陆望.物理模型试验技术研究及其在岩土工程中的应用[D].中国科学院博士学位论文,2006.10.
[57]王贵君.底摩擦模型法[J].阜新矿业学院学报,1990,9(4):117~121.
[58]董云.边坡变形破坏机制的底摩擦试验模拟[J].东北公路,2003,26(4):66~68.
[59]金小萍.层状岩体高陡边坡底摩擦模拟试验研究[J].金属矿山,1998,(3):7~9,12.
[60]陈孝兵,李渝生,赵小平.底摩擦重力试验在倾倒变形岩体稳定性研究中的应用[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京);北京大学),2008,15(2):300~304.
[61]蔡国军,裴钻.反倾互层岩质边坡开挖物理模拟试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(5):121~124,128.
[62]蔡国军,黄润秋,严明,龚满福.反倾向边坡开挖变形破裂响应的物理模拟研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(4):811~817.
[63]石豫川,冯文凯,冯学钢,兰波.国道108线某段缓倾角顺层边坡变形破坏机制物理模拟研究[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,30(4):350~355.
[64]冯文凯,石豫川,柴贺军,刘汉超.斜坡填筑路堤变形破坏物理模拟研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(增1):2861~2867.
[65]陈亚军,王家臣,常来山,朱红杰,刘广责.节理岩体边坡渐进破坏的试验研究[J].金属矿山,2005,(8):11~13,17.
[66] Cundall P A. A computer model for simulating progressive large-scale movements in block rock systems[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on RockFracture.France :Nancy ,1971:8~12.
[67]王卫华,李夕兵.离散元法及其在岩土工程中的应用综述[J].岩土工程技术,2005,19(4):177~181.
[68]沈宝堂,王泳嘉.边坡破坏机制的离散单元法研究[J].东北土学院学报,1989, 10(4):349~ 354.
[69]郭爱民,卢世宗.矿山边坡破坏机制的离散单元法模拟[J].东北土学院学报,1992, 13(1): 25~ 32.
[70]朱浮声,王泳嘉,斯蒂芬森.露人矿山高陡岩石边坡失稳的三维离散元分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),1997,18(3):233~ 236.
[71]焦玉勇,葛修润.基于静态松弛法求解的三维离散单元法[J].岩石力学与土程学报,2000, 19( 4) : 453~ 458.
[72]李世海,高波,燕琳.三峡永久船闸高边坡开挖三维离散元数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2002, 23( 3) : 272~277.
[73]汤明高.节理岩体高边坡稳定性研究及应用—以云南小湾水电工程6#山梁为例[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2004.6.
[74]杨绪波.大型岩质边坡开挖的岩体结构效应研究—以云南澜沧江小湾水电站4#山梁边坡为例[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2005.5.
[75]何军,石豫川,寇佳伟,冯文凯.某库区大型堆积体成因机制三维离散元模拟[J].水土保特研究,2008, 15( 6) : 185~187.
[76]李世贵.汶川5.12地震诱发大光包巨型滑坡形成机理及运动特征研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010.6.
[77]李世凯.强震作用下岩质边坡崩塌的动力响应分析—以麻柳沟汉川地震岩质崩塌为例[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010.6.
[78]李磊.滑坡堆积体的地震波动力响应研究[D].成都理工大学硕士学位论文,2010.6.
[79]许向宁.高地震烈度区山体变形破裂机制地质分析与地质力学模拟研究[D].成都理工大学博士学位论文,2006.4.
[80]祁生文,伍法权,刘春玲,丁彦慧.地震边坡稳定性的工程地质分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,8.
[81]程东幸,刘大安,丁恩保,赵红敏,潘炜,郭华锋.层状反倾岩质边坡影响因素及反倾条件分析[J].岩土工程学报,2005, 27( 11) : 1362~1366.