用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中国非省会地级市发展评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在我国251座地级城市(2009年底)中,非省会地级市达238座,约占总数的95%,是我国地级市的主体部分。本文旨在采用结构方程模型(SEM)方法对我国非省会地级市发展水平进行评价,且与主成分分析(PCA)方法的评价结果进行比较,并从空间区位和城市规模两个角度对评价结果进行进一步分析。
     首先,对城市发展的相关理论进行梳理,构建涵盖经济、社会、环境三个层面的城市发展评价体系;并通过对现有城市发展评价方法的比较,确定本文的评价方法,从而为本课题以后的研究打下理论和实证分析基础。
     其次,采用SEM和PCA两种方法对非省会地级市的发展水平进行评价,并利用斯皮尔曼系数方法对两者进行比较分析。结果表明,SEM方法优于PCA方法,这说明利用SEM方法对城市发展水平进行评价,其结果更加合理、准确。
     再次,在SEM方法评价结果的基础上,从空间区位和城市规模两个角度对非省会地级市的发展水平进行分析。空间区位视角分析结果表明,东部非省会地级市发展水平总体上远远超过中部和西部,且内部城市发展差距也远远高于中西部。城市规模视角分析结果表明,超大城市四项发展水平总体上远远超过特大、大、中等及小城市,且内部城市发展差距也远远高于其余四者,而特大、大、中等与小城市,无论从总体上还是其内部差距上,都没有明显差异。
     最后,基于以上分析结果,分别提出推进区域之间及区域内部城市公共服务均等化、加大政策扶持、规范自身发展和鼓励条件较好的大、特大城市发展为超大城市、保持各类规模城市协调发展的政策建议。
In 251 county level cities(by the end of the year of 2009) of China, there are 238 non-provincial capital county level cities which constitute about 95 percent of the total number and are body part of our country's county level cities. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the development of the non-provincial capital county level cities by the method of structural equation modeling and compare with the evaluation result by principal component analysis, at the same time, it makes further analysis of the evaluation result from the angles of space location and city scale.
     Firstly, put the relative theory of city development in order and construct the evaluation system of city development covering three levels of economy、society、environment; identifying this article's theory of evaluation through the comparison of the evaluation theory of the current city development so as to forms the base of theoretically and empirically analyzsis.
     Secondly, evaluate the development of non-provincial capital county level cities by the method of SEM and PCA which will be compared by the method of spearman correlation coefficient. The result indicates that the SEM has an advantage over the PCA from which tells that as to the evaluation the development of city, the method of SEM is more reasonable and accurate.
     Thirdly, on the basis of the evaluation result of SEM method, analyzes the development of non-provincial capital county level cities from the angles of space location and city scale. The analysis result of the former angle indicates that the development level of eastern non-provincial capital county level cities tatally far exceed that of in west and central regions and so do the gap of the inner city’s development.Analysis of city size showed that the four urban development of large are further more than big, big, medium and small cities in general. Urbans within the district is much higher than the other four, while the large, large, medium and small cities , has no significant difference.both in general or its internal gaps.
     Finally, based on the above results, policy recommendations were presented to promote the equalization of urban public services among the regions , support policy, regulate their own development ,encourage large and large urban development in better conditions to mega cities, and maintain cities of all sizes to coordinated development.
引文
1 UNDP.Human Development Report 1990,1992,1993,1994,1995 and 1996.NewYork: Oxford University Press,1997:165-213
    2 World Bank.Living Standards Measurement Study of the WordBank.Washington: World Bank Press. 1980:271-305
    3 H.T.Odum.Environmental Accounting, Energy and Environmental Decision-Making. NewYork:Wiley,1996:202-210
    4张林英,周永章,杨国华.可持续发展指标体系研究简评.云南地理环境研究, 2005,20(5):52-65
    5叶文虎,仝川.联合国可持续发展指标体系述评.中国人口资源与环境,1997,12(3): 24-33
    6 UN Commission on Sustainable Development.Indicators of Sustainable Development Framework and Methodologies.New York: Oxford University Press,1996:154-169
    7 MeyerC.A.Environmental and Resource Accounting:Where to Begin.Washington:World Resources Institute,1993:267-285
    8中国2l世纪议程管理中心.论中国的可持续发展.北京:海洋出版社,1994:213-289
    9中国科学院可持续发展研究组.2005中国可持续发展战略报告.北京:科学出社,2005: 349-360
    10郝晓辉.可持续发展指标体系初探.世界环境,1996,15(1):11-13
    11朱启贵.国内外可持续发展指标体系评论.合肥联合大学学报,2000,10(1):11-23
    12王奇,叶文虎.从可持续发展看两大部类生产理论丰富和发展.中国人口资源与环境,2003,13(1):1-5
    13王铮.区域可持续发展评估指标体系.科学发展观地理教育,2005,15(3):58-65
    14胡学锋.坚持以人为本改进反映全面建设小康社会的指标体系.南方经济,2004,19 (7):76-82
    15朱庆芳.从指标体系看构建和谐社会亟待解决的几个问题.中国经贸刊,2005,20(8): 40-47
    16吴喜平.沿海城市可持续可持续发展评价与政策分析的探索.[厦门大学硕士学位论文].2006:35-48
    17付支霞.白山市可持续发展能力评价—基于生态足迹和模糊综合评判两种方法.[东北师范大学硕士学位论文].2008:28
    18 Ray.S.Cline. World Power Assessment. New York:Westview Press Inc,1975:286-342
    19 Ray.S.Cline. World Power Trends and U.S.Foreign Policy for the 1980S. New York: Westview Press Inc,1981:327-359
    20 IMD.The World Competitiveness Year Book.Lausanne:Switzerland,2000:1995-2001
    21 IMD.The World Competitiveness Year Book.Lausanne:Switzerland,2003:362-391
    22 WEF.The Global Competitiveness Report.Geneva:Switzerland,2000:1996—2000
    23 Peter Karl Kresl and Balwant Singh.The Competitiveness of City:the United States, Cities and the New Global Economy.Melbourne:OECD and the Australian Government,1995:425-446
    24 Peter Karl Kresl and Balwant Singh.The Competitiveness and the Urban Economy:Twenty-four Large US Metropolitan Areas.Urban Studies,1999,36(5):11-26
    25 Wackernagel M.ReesW.Perceptual and Structural Barriers to Investing in Natural Capital:Economics from an Ecological Footprint Perspective.Ecological Economics,1997,20(8):42-54
    26 Stephen C, Mangi, Callum M.Roberts.Reef Fisheries Management in Kenya: Preliminary Approaching the Driver-Pressure-State—Impacts-Response(DPSIR) Scheme of Indicators.Ocean and Coastal Management ,2007,48(50):463-480
    27 Dennis.A.Rondinelli and Gyula vastag.Urban Economic Growthin the 21st Century:Assessing the International Competitiveness of Metropolitan Areas,Migration,Urbanization,and Development.United Nations Population Fundand Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998,42(2):469-514
    28 Douglas Webster, Larissa Muller. Urban Competitiveness Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions:The Road Forward.Paper Prepared for Urban Group, 2000,38(15):341
    29 Markku Sotarauta, Reija Linnamaa.Urban Competitiveness and Management of UrbanPolicy Networks:Some Reflections from Tampere and Oulu.Paper Presented in Conference on Cities at the Millennium,1998, 15(3):16-21
    30 Janne Huovari. The Common Pool Dilemma of Global Public Goods:Lessons from the World Bank’S Net Income and Reserves.World Development,2002,30(3):337-354
    31 LainDeas, Benito Glordano.Measuring Urban Competitiveness in English Cities.Environment and Planning,2001,15(9):1411-1429
    32 IainBegg.Urban Competitiveness Policies for Dynamic Cities. The PolicyPress,2002, 16(3):1380-1384
    33郝寿义,倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力研究一以若干城市为例.经济科学,1998,20(3):15- 17
    34王秉安,陈振华,叶穗山.区域竞争力理论与实证.北京:航空工业出版社,2000:100- 104
    35倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力报告.北京:社会科学文献出版社.2005:37-46
    36上海社会科学院.城市综合竞争力比较研究中心:国内若干大城市综合竞争力比较研究.上海经济研究,2001,15(1):109-121
    37宁越敏,唐礼智.城市竞争力的概念和指标体系.现代城市研究,2001,16(3):51-56
    38吴大喜.城市竞争力:深圳与京津沪穗之比较.特区理论与实践,2001,18(5):37
    39徐康宁.论城市竞争与城市竞争力.南京社会科学,2002,31(5):7-11
    40北京国际城市发展研究院.中国城市蓝皮书.北京:中国时代经济出版社,2003:48-51
    41王桂新,沈建法.中国地级以上城市综合竞争力研究.复旦学报,2002,15(3):16-19
    42何念如.长江三角洲城市竞争力的研究.南京经济学院学报,2003,16(3):42-45
    43肖红叶.1985-2004中国区域竞争力发展报告.北京:中国统计出版社,2004:8-21
    44蒋耀.基于层次分析法的区域可持续发展综合评价:以青浦区为例.上海交通大学报,2009,43(4):566-571
    45赵春容,赵万民.模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用.环境科学与技术,2009,33(3):179-183
    46刘亚臣.基于层次分析法的城镇化水平模糊综合评价.沈阳建筑大学报,2008,24(1): 132-136
    47范柏乃等.城市技术创新能力评价指标筛选方法研究.科学研究,2007,20(6):663-668
    48赵光华,丁艳萍.基于AHP的区域经济差异评价方法研究.集团经济研究,2006,35 (12):136-137
    49刘建翠.全面小康社会的综合评价与国际比较.中国青年科技,2005,14(1):48-52
    50郑静,吴海伟,郑小青.山东省17个地级市经济发展水平测度—基于因子分析和聚类分析.山西财经大学学报,2010,32(1):22-23
    51王英.基于灰色关联理论的FDI和中国区域经济发展差距研究.系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(3):426-430
    52樊长科,吴雨.广西各地市区域经济发展水平分析—基于系统聚类法和主成分分析法.安徽农业科学,2010,38(14):7620-7622
    53耿海清,陈帆等.基于全局主成分分析的我国省级行政区城市化水平综合评价.人文地理,2009,24(5):47-51
    54任胜钢,彭建华.基于因子分析法的中国区域创新能力的评价及比较.系统工程,2007,25(2):87-92
    55张瑛,王惠文.结构方程模型在系统综合评估指数中的应用.北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2008,21(1):10-12
    56李永强,何永,李清政.结构方程模型在城市营销中的应用.中国软科学,2007,20(4): 109-117
    57黄友钧,徐建等.主成分分析在城市可持续发展评价中的应用.安徽农业科学,2007, 35(24):7597-7598,7600
    58门可佩,周丽.江苏区域经济发展水平的灰色关联聚类分析.安徽农业科学,2007,35 (20):6243-6244
    59杨竹莘,张俊涛.区域科技创新能力的灰色关联综合评价研究.数学的实践与识,2007,37(9):17-22
    60李永强.城市竞争力与评价模型研究.[西南财经大学博士学位论文].2005:119-221
    61饶会林等.现代城市经济学概论.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2008:47-56
    62王志文.辨析经济增长与经济发展.辽东学院学报,2006,8(46):84-86
    63梁志华.城市可持续发展评价体系的对比研究.[天津大学硕士学位论文].2005:2, 51-54
    64佛朗索瓦·佩鲁.新发展观.张宁等译.北京:华夏出版社,1987:1l
    65埃德加·欧文斯.发展中世界自由的未来:作为政治改革的经济发展.牛津:帕加蒙出版社,1987:15
    66王力娟.基于科学发展观的区域经济综合评价体系研究.[中南大学硕士学位论文].2004:18-22
    67侯杰泰,成子娟.结构方程模型的应用及分析策略.心理学探新,1999,19(1):55-59
    68邱皓政,林碧芳.结构方程模型的原理与应用.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009:1-297
    69吴兆龙,丁晓.结构方程模型的理论、建立与应用.科技管理研究,2004,25(6):90-94
    70周涛,鲁耀斌.结构方程模型及其在实证分析中的应用.工业工程与管理,2006,16 (5):99-102
    71任殇,李田田,陈安.结构方程模型在科研机构评估中的应用.实验技术与管理, 2007,24(8):132-135
    72张红兵等.SPSS宝典.北京:电子工业出版社,2007:89-110

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700