城市土地低碳利用的外部现状描述、内部静态测度及动态协调控制
|
摘要
城市土地作为物质空间容纳了各种生产及创造性活动,进行着各种物质与能量交换,提供了社会及人类发展的空间与平台,而城市节能减排则对全球气候与环境的影响意义重大,因此两者结合而形成的城市土地低碳利用研究将成为城市科学及环境科学领域研究的新热点。
城市土地低碳利用研究直接涉及城市经济、社会、资源与环境等多方面内容和城市生产、建设与生活等多项主体,是一个开放、复杂的系统性问题。进行城市土地低碳利用研究,促进低碳城市发展,需要对影响城市土地利用CO2排放的因素进行定性分析、定量研究与模型计算,进而有针对性的提出相应的降碳措施,并最终为城市资源环境问题的改善以及城市节能减排目标的实现提供理论依据和实践支持。
本文将低碳经济引入城市土地利用之中,在深度剖析城市土地低碳利用的基本内涵的基础上,从系统学角度出发构建了城市土地低碳利用的系统概念模型,进而对城市土地低碳利用依次进行了外部现状描述、内部静态测度和动态协调控制的深入分析,并以江苏省南京市为例进行了相应的实证研究。
就系统概念模型的构建而言,城市土地低碳利用主要体现在对城市土地利用的总体碳源控制、各分项城市建设用地利用的碳排放控制以及城市陆地生态系统碳汇能力提升三个方面,其中又以第二个层面最为关键,这也是本文进行相关研究的主要着力点；而从系统学角度来看,城市土地低碳利用按其构成部分的等级高低可以相继分解成目标层、子系统层、要素层和变量层四个层次。
在外部现状描述部分,本文在阐述城市土地利用的碳排放量测算方式和碳吸收量估算方法的基础上,进行了城市土地利用的净碳排放测算,进而在此基础上依次进行了内部关联角度的城市土地低碳利用要素交互协同发展状况分析和外部关联角度的城市土地利用碳排放与城市经济发展脱钩分析。实证研究发现,行政区划调整对南京市城市土地低碳利用的外部表现有较大的影响,而在1996-2007年间,南京市城市土地利用的总碳排放量远远大于陆地生态系统的碳吸收量且两者之间的差距有逐渐扩大的发展趋势；南京市城市土地低碳利用各构成要素之间的相互作用程度较为明显,且1996-2007年南京市经济增长与土地利用总碳排放的总脱钩指数为0.45,土地利用总碳排放量的GDP弹性系数为0.27,处于相对脱钩状态。
在内部静态测度部分,本文在建立内部静态测度指标体系的基础上,依次对城市土地低碳利用的要素影响变量障碍程度进行了时间序列的测度分析和对城市土地低碳利用的区际发展水平进行了空间布局的测度分析。实证分析表明,从总体上来看南京市城市土地低碳利用在曲折反复中还是逐步朝好的方向发展,而文通用地和工业用地对南京市城市土地低碳利用发展的贡献作用最大,且2007年影响南京市城市土地低碳利用的最主要的障碍因素指标是交通用地的交通减排系数；南京市城市土地低碳利用水平在江苏省内处于领先位置,而江苏省经济发展最好的苏南地区在城市土地低碳利用方面的现实水平却呈现出最低,且实施集团上跃难度最小和最大的城市分别为镇江市和苏州市,最易出现集团序下滑和最不易出现集团序下滑的城市则分别为宿迁市和南通市。
在动态协调控制部分,本文在借鉴多级递阶协调控制理论的基础上,以城市土地低碳利用的动态预警设计为基本依据来构建了城市土地低碳利用的控制器,并从管理、系统以及程序三维角度出发来构建了城市土地低碳利用的协调器,进而实现城市土地低碳利用动态协调控制体系的整体构建。实证研究显示,若继续保持目前的城市土地利用现状,则从2010年到2020年间,南京市城市土地低碳利用碳源子系统的综合警情将会出现从轻警向巨警过渡的发展趋势,且对南京市未来城市土地低碳利用造成威胁大小的排列顺序依次为交通用地、工业用地、商办用地和居住用地；在制定具体的协调控制策略时,应在充分考虑南京市相关实证分析结果的基础上,遵循多级递阶协调控制的基本思路,从管理角度、系统角度和程序角度三个层面出发,制定可操作性较强、实施效果明显的具体策略,具体包括优化现有土地利用结构与合理规划未来土地利用格局、科学创建城市土地低碳利用的管理机制、全面优化城市土地利用的产业结构、大力调整城市土地利用的能源体系、充分发挥市场机制在优化城市土地低碳利用中的基础性作用以及积极倡导城市土地低碳利用的消费理念等。
As a physical space to accommodate a variety of production and creative activity, and exchange a variety of material and energy, urban land provides the space and platform for social and human development. Meanwhile, the energy saving and (?)rbon reducing of the urban is of great significance on the global climate and environment. Therefore, as a combination of both them stated above, the low-carbon using of urban land will be the new hot spot of the study on the urban science and environmental science.
The low-carbon using of urban land is an open, complex systemic problem, directly related to economy, society, resource, environment and many other fields in the content, and related to production, construction, life and many other factors on the subject. To promote the development of low-carbon city, the study firstly need to emphasize on the qualitative analysis, quantitative research and modeling calculation on the factors of carbon emission. And then, it has to focus on appropriate measures to reduce carbon emission, and ultimately to provide a theoretical basis and practical support both on improving the resourceful'and environmental issues and on achieving the target on the energy saving and carbon reducing.
This article introduces the low-carbon economy into the study field of the urban land using, and constructcs a conceptual system model which is based on the depth analysis of the basic connotation of low-carbon using of urban land. Furthermore, it successively launchs the in-depth analysis on the system from the level on the external status description, internal static measurement and dynamic coordination control, and takes the Nanjing city of Jiangsu province as an example to the corresponding empirical research.
In terms of constructing the conceptual system model, the low-carbon using of urban land is mainly reflected in the control of the overall carbon source, the control of carbon emission on the kinds of construction land and the enhancement of carbon-sinking capacity of the urban terrestrial ecosystems. Among them, the second level is the key factor which is related to this article on the main landing point. From the systematic point of view, the system stated above may have been broken down into four levels which include target layer, subsystem layer, element layer and variable layer according to the grade of the components.
In order to initially grasp the basic situation, this article firstly develops the corresponding external description, which is based on the measurement of the carbon emission, the carbon sinking and the net carbon emission of urban land using. Secondly, the collaborative interaction analysis on the element layer is implemented from the inter-associated point of view. To the third, it carries out the decoupling analysis between the urban carbon emission and the urban economic development from the exter-associated point of view. The empirical study on the city of Nanjing finds that the adjustment of administrative divisions has a greater impact on the external performance. In 1996 to 2007, the total carbon emission is far greater than the carbon sinking in terrestrial ecosystems volume and the gap between the two factors is widened step by step. Moreover, the interaction between the elements is obvious, and from 1996 to 2007, when the total decoupling index between the total economic growth and the total carbon emission is 0.45, the GDP elasticity of carbon emission is 0.27. which manifests a relatively decoupled state.
Viewed as a complex system behavior, the low-carbon using of urban land should be comprehensively carried on the measure of internal static situation, which aims at finding out the key factors constraining and impeding in healthy development of the system in order to optimize the urban land-use. By creating an internal static measurement indicator system, the solution to this plan is to click on the time-series analysis on the barriers degree of the variable layer and the region-layout analysis on the development level from the perspective within static measurement. The empirical study finds that in general the low-carbon using of urban land in Nanjing city has a trend toward the right direction gradually in spite of the setbacks repeated, when the transporting land and the industrial land have the rather greater effect on contributing to the development. Furthermore, in 2007 the most important barrier is the indicator of the carbon reducing coefficient of transporting land. Then, when Nanjing city has the leading positon in Jiangsu province, the developed cities in south show the reality of the lowest level. Between the Group, Zhenjiang City has the smallest difficulty on jumping and Suzhou City has the largest one, when Nantong City has the smallest possibility on declining and Suqian City has the largest one.
For the continuous monitoring on the development trend and the more effectively improving on the level of decision-making, it is need to implement the dynamic coordination analysis. Considering the complexity, this article learns from the multi-level hierarchical coordinated control theory to carry on the analysis, which includes the step of taking the dynamic early warning as the fundamental basis to build low-carbon using controller on one hand and the step of taking the managemental means, systemic means and programmed means as the three-dimensional perspective to build low-carbon using coordinator on the other hand. The empirical study shows that if Naning city will continue to maintain the current status from 2010 to 2020, the comprehensive warning condition of the carbon-source subsystem will has the transition from mild to huge, and the order of the size of the future threats will be arranged as the transporting land, the industrial land, the commercial-office land and the residential land. In terms of creating the specific control strategies, it is need to consider the empirical analysis of Nanjing city stated above. By following the basic ideas of the multi-level hierarchical coordinated control, this article puts forward the strong-operated and well-targeted strategies from the view of management, system and procedure, which specifically include the optimization of the existing land structure, the rational planning for the future pattern on land using, the scientific creation of the management mechanism, the optimization of the industrial structure, the actively adjustment on the energy system, the exertion of the fundamental role of the market mechanism, and the actively promoting of the consumption concepts.
城市土地低碳利用研究直接涉及城市经济、社会、资源与环境等多方面内容和城市生产、建设与生活等多项主体,是一个开放、复杂的系统性问题。进行城市土地低碳利用研究,促进低碳城市发展,需要对影响城市土地利用CO2排放的因素进行定性分析、定量研究与模型计算,进而有针对性的提出相应的降碳措施,并最终为城市资源环境问题的改善以及城市节能减排目标的实现提供理论依据和实践支持。
本文将低碳经济引入城市土地利用之中,在深度剖析城市土地低碳利用的基本内涵的基础上,从系统学角度出发构建了城市土地低碳利用的系统概念模型,进而对城市土地低碳利用依次进行了外部现状描述、内部静态测度和动态协调控制的深入分析,并以江苏省南京市为例进行了相应的实证研究。
就系统概念模型的构建而言,城市土地低碳利用主要体现在对城市土地利用的总体碳源控制、各分项城市建设用地利用的碳排放控制以及城市陆地生态系统碳汇能力提升三个方面,其中又以第二个层面最为关键,这也是本文进行相关研究的主要着力点；而从系统学角度来看,城市土地低碳利用按其构成部分的等级高低可以相继分解成目标层、子系统层、要素层和变量层四个层次。
在外部现状描述部分,本文在阐述城市土地利用的碳排放量测算方式和碳吸收量估算方法的基础上,进行了城市土地利用的净碳排放测算,进而在此基础上依次进行了内部关联角度的城市土地低碳利用要素交互协同发展状况分析和外部关联角度的城市土地利用碳排放与城市经济发展脱钩分析。实证研究发现,行政区划调整对南京市城市土地低碳利用的外部表现有较大的影响,而在1996-2007年间,南京市城市土地利用的总碳排放量远远大于陆地生态系统的碳吸收量且两者之间的差距有逐渐扩大的发展趋势；南京市城市土地低碳利用各构成要素之间的相互作用程度较为明显,且1996-2007年南京市经济增长与土地利用总碳排放的总脱钩指数为0.45,土地利用总碳排放量的GDP弹性系数为0.27,处于相对脱钩状态。
在内部静态测度部分,本文在建立内部静态测度指标体系的基础上,依次对城市土地低碳利用的要素影响变量障碍程度进行了时间序列的测度分析和对城市土地低碳利用的区际发展水平进行了空间布局的测度分析。实证分析表明,从总体上来看南京市城市土地低碳利用在曲折反复中还是逐步朝好的方向发展,而文通用地和工业用地对南京市城市土地低碳利用发展的贡献作用最大,且2007年影响南京市城市土地低碳利用的最主要的障碍因素指标是交通用地的交通减排系数；南京市城市土地低碳利用水平在江苏省内处于领先位置,而江苏省经济发展最好的苏南地区在城市土地低碳利用方面的现实水平却呈现出最低,且实施集团上跃难度最小和最大的城市分别为镇江市和苏州市,最易出现集团序下滑和最不易出现集团序下滑的城市则分别为宿迁市和南通市。
在动态协调控制部分,本文在借鉴多级递阶协调控制理论的基础上,以城市土地低碳利用的动态预警设计为基本依据来构建了城市土地低碳利用的控制器,并从管理、系统以及程序三维角度出发来构建了城市土地低碳利用的协调器,进而实现城市土地低碳利用动态协调控制体系的整体构建。实证研究显示,若继续保持目前的城市土地利用现状,则从2010年到2020年间,南京市城市土地低碳利用碳源子系统的综合警情将会出现从轻警向巨警过渡的发展趋势,且对南京市未来城市土地低碳利用造成威胁大小的排列顺序依次为交通用地、工业用地、商办用地和居住用地；在制定具体的协调控制策略时,应在充分考虑南京市相关实证分析结果的基础上,遵循多级递阶协调控制的基本思路,从管理角度、系统角度和程序角度三个层面出发,制定可操作性较强、实施效果明显的具体策略,具体包括优化现有土地利用结构与合理规划未来土地利用格局、科学创建城市土地低碳利用的管理机制、全面优化城市土地利用的产业结构、大力调整城市土地利用的能源体系、充分发挥市场机制在优化城市土地低碳利用中的基础性作用以及积极倡导城市土地低碳利用的消费理念等。
As a physical space to accommodate a variety of production and creative activity, and exchange a variety of material and energy, urban land provides the space and platform for social and human development. Meanwhile, the energy saving and (?)rbon reducing of the urban is of great significance on the global climate and environment. Therefore, as a combination of both them stated above, the low-carbon using of urban land will be the new hot spot of the study on the urban science and environmental science.
The low-carbon using of urban land is an open, complex systemic problem, directly related to economy, society, resource, environment and many other fields in the content, and related to production, construction, life and many other factors on the subject. To promote the development of low-carbon city, the study firstly need to emphasize on the qualitative analysis, quantitative research and modeling calculation on the factors of carbon emission. And then, it has to focus on appropriate measures to reduce carbon emission, and ultimately to provide a theoretical basis and practical support both on improving the resourceful'and environmental issues and on achieving the target on the energy saving and carbon reducing.
This article introduces the low-carbon economy into the study field of the urban land using, and constructcs a conceptual system model which is based on the depth analysis of the basic connotation of low-carbon using of urban land. Furthermore, it successively launchs the in-depth analysis on the system from the level on the external status description, internal static measurement and dynamic coordination control, and takes the Nanjing city of Jiangsu province as an example to the corresponding empirical research.
In terms of constructing the conceptual system model, the low-carbon using of urban land is mainly reflected in the control of the overall carbon source, the control of carbon emission on the kinds of construction land and the enhancement of carbon-sinking capacity of the urban terrestrial ecosystems. Among them, the second level is the key factor which is related to this article on the main landing point. From the systematic point of view, the system stated above may have been broken down into four levels which include target layer, subsystem layer, element layer and variable layer according to the grade of the components.
In order to initially grasp the basic situation, this article firstly develops the corresponding external description, which is based on the measurement of the carbon emission, the carbon sinking and the net carbon emission of urban land using. Secondly, the collaborative interaction analysis on the element layer is implemented from the inter-associated point of view. To the third, it carries out the decoupling analysis between the urban carbon emission and the urban economic development from the exter-associated point of view. The empirical study on the city of Nanjing finds that the adjustment of administrative divisions has a greater impact on the external performance. In 1996 to 2007, the total carbon emission is far greater than the carbon sinking in terrestrial ecosystems volume and the gap between the two factors is widened step by step. Moreover, the interaction between the elements is obvious, and from 1996 to 2007, when the total decoupling index between the total economic growth and the total carbon emission is 0.45, the GDP elasticity of carbon emission is 0.27. which manifests a relatively decoupled state.
Viewed as a complex system behavior, the low-carbon using of urban land should be comprehensively carried on the measure of internal static situation, which aims at finding out the key factors constraining and impeding in healthy development of the system in order to optimize the urban land-use. By creating an internal static measurement indicator system, the solution to this plan is to click on the time-series analysis on the barriers degree of the variable layer and the region-layout analysis on the development level from the perspective within static measurement. The empirical study finds that in general the low-carbon using of urban land in Nanjing city has a trend toward the right direction gradually in spite of the setbacks repeated, when the transporting land and the industrial land have the rather greater effect on contributing to the development. Furthermore, in 2007 the most important barrier is the indicator of the carbon reducing coefficient of transporting land. Then, when Nanjing city has the leading positon in Jiangsu province, the developed cities in south show the reality of the lowest level. Between the Group, Zhenjiang City has the smallest difficulty on jumping and Suzhou City has the largest one, when Nantong City has the smallest possibility on declining and Suqian City has the largest one.
For the continuous monitoring on the development trend and the more effectively improving on the level of decision-making, it is need to implement the dynamic coordination analysis. Considering the complexity, this article learns from the multi-level hierarchical coordinated control theory to carry on the analysis, which includes the step of taking the dynamic early warning as the fundamental basis to build low-carbon using controller on one hand and the step of taking the managemental means, systemic means and programmed means as the three-dimensional perspective to build low-carbon using coordinator on the other hand. The empirical study shows that if Naning city will continue to maintain the current status from 2010 to 2020, the comprehensive warning condition of the carbon-source subsystem will has the transition from mild to huge, and the order of the size of the future threats will be arranged as the transporting land, the industrial land, the commercial-office land and the residential land. In terms of creating the specific control strategies, it is need to consider the empirical analysis of Nanjing city stated above. By following the basic ideas of the multi-level hierarchical coordinated control, this article puts forward the strong-operated and well-targeted strategies from the view of management, system and procedure, which specifically include the optimization of the existing land structure, the rational planning for the future pattern on land using, the scientific creation of the management mechanism, the optimization of the industrial structure, the actively adjustment on the energy system, the exertion of the fundamental role of the market mechanism, and the actively promoting of the consumption concepts.
引文
[1]Allen, J.& Lu, K. Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina:a GIS-based integrated approach[J/OL]. http://www.consec ol.org/vol8/iss2/art2/,2003-11-26
[2]Amarsaikhan, D., Ganzorig, M. & Saandar, M. Urban change study using RS and GIS[J]. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics,2001,2 (2):73-78
[3]Andrianasolo, H. & Nghi, D. Q. Assessment of map certainty on urban growth using remote sensing and GIS integration[C]. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Hong Kong,1999:618-622
[4]Asante-Duah, D. K. Management of contaminated site problems[M]. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press,1996
[5]Bardo, J, W. & Hartman, J. J. Urban sociology:a systematic introduction[M]. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers,1982
[6]Barker, T., Junankar, S. & Pollitt, H. et al. The macroeconomic effects of unilateral environmental tax reforms in Europe,1995-2012[A]. In:Cottrell, J., Milne, J. E. & Ashiabor, H. et al. (eds.). Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation-Volume Ⅵ: International and Comparative Perspectives. Brampton, ON:Oxford University Press-Canada,2009:23-33
[7]Campbell, H. S. Urban land use:residential patterns and change[J/OL]. http://www.un cc.edu/hscampbe/landuse/a-intro/intro.html.1998-06-22
[8]Capozza, D. R. & Helsley, R. W. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1989,26 (3):295-306
[9]Capozza, D. R. & Li, Y. M. The intensity and timing of investment:the case of land[J]. American Economic Review,1994.84 (4):889-904
[10]Chafer, M. & Wright, G. L. An analysis of land capability assessment using remotely sensed data[C]. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Conference on Remote Sensing, Melbourne,1994:601-608
[II]Chapin, F. S. & Kaiser, E. J. Urban land use planning[M]. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.1967
[12]Chicago Metropolis 2020. The metropolis plan:choices for the Chicago region(technical report) [EB/OL]. http://www.metropolisplan.org/Section%20I%20Metropolis%20Plan.pdf
[13]Cho, M. Congestion effects of spatial growth restrictions:a model and empirical analysis[J]. Real Estate Economics,1997.25 (3):409-438
[14]Cho, S. H., Poudyal, N. & Lambert, D. M. Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value[J]. Land Use Policy,2008,25 (3): 320-329
[15]CEC (Commission of the European Communities). Europe's climate change opportunity[M]. Brussels:CEC,2008
[16]Corburn, J. Urban land use, air toxics and public health:assessing hazardous exposures at the neighborhood scale[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2007,27(2): 145-160
[17]Cox, K. R., Reynolds, D. R. & Rokkan, S. Locational approaches to power and conflict[M]. New York:Halsted Press,1974
[18]Czogala, E. & Roubens, M. Approach to multi-criteria decision making problems using probabilistic set theory[J], European Journal of Operational Research,1989,43(3):263-266
[19]DeBell, R. Urban land use allocation model:an analysis of its purpose and an anal-ysis of its purpose and function[J/OL]. http://classweb.gmu.edu/dparker3/lumta_present /debell_presentation.pdf
[20]Deng, J. S., Wang, K. & Li, J. et al. Urban land use change detection using Multisensor satellite images[J]. Pedosphere,2009,19 (1):96-103
[21]Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Energy White Paper:creating a low carbon economy[M]. London:DTI,2003:22-73
[22]De Sousa, C. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development:a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the greater Toronto area[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2000,43 (6): 831-853
[23]De Sousa, C. Contaminated sites management:the Canadian situation in international context[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2001,62 (2):131-154
[24]De Sousa, C. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003.62 (4):181-198
[25]Dipasquale, D. & Wheaton, W. C. Urban economics and real estate markets[M]. En-glewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall,1996
[26]FAO. FESLM:an international framework for evaluating sustainable land manageme-nt[EB/OL]. http://nhjy.hzau.edu.cn/kech/2006/tdlygh/jxzy/en/feslm.pdf
[27]Ford, G., Macdonald, D. & Winfield, M. Who pays for past sins? policy issues surrounding contaminated site remediation in Canada[J]. Alternatives.1994,20 (4):28-34
[28]Form, W. H. The place of social structure in the determination of land use:some implications for a theory of urban ecology[J]. Social Forces,1954,32 (4):317-323
[29]Frederick Schneiders Research. Survey of state and local officials on liveable communities[M]. Washington DC:The American Institute of Architects,1999
[30]Fried, M. Residential attachment:sources of residential and community satisfaction[J]. Journal of Social Issues,1982,38 (3):107-119
[31]Fujita, M. Urban land use theory[A]. In:Lesourne, J. & Sonnenschein, H. (eds.). Location theory. New York:Harwood Academic Publishers,1986:73-149
[32]Garvin, A., Berens, G. & Leinberger, C. B. et al. Urban parks and open space[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute,1997
[33]Glaeser, E. L. & Kahn, M. E. The greenness of cities:carbon dioxide emissions and urban development[M]. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research,2008
[34]Goodall, C. How to live a low-carbon live:the individual's guide to stopping climate change[M]. London:Earthscan,2007
[35]Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K. & Mayer, H. et al. Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States[J]. The Environmentalist,2001,21 (2):129-143
[36]Haiyan, C., Beisi, J. & Lau, S. S. Y. Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy [J]. Habitat International,2008,32 (1):28-40
[37]Harnik, P. Inside city parks[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute,2000
[38]Harvey, D. Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution[J]. Regional Studies,1974,8 (3-4):239-255
[39]Hough, M. Cities and natural process[M]. London:Rutledge,1995:5-32
[40]Hough, M., Benson, B. & Evenson, J. Greening the Toronto port lands[M]. Toronto: Waterfront Regeneration Trust,1997:1-41
[41]IPCC. Climate Change 2001:The scientific basis[R]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001
[42]IPCC. Climate change 2007:synthesisreport[M]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Univ ersity Press,2007a
[43]IPCC. Climate change 2007:impacts, adaptation and vulnerability[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2007b
[44]Johnston, D., Lowe, R. J. & Bell, M. An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year2050[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33 (13):1635-1651
[45]Kaplan, R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1993,26 (1-4):193-201
[46]Kawase, R., Matsuoka, Y. & Fujino, J. Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission in long-term climate stabilization scenarios[J]. Energy Pol icy.2006,34 (15):2113-2122
[47]Kenworthy, J. & Hu, G. Transport and urban form in Chinese cities:an international comparative and policy perspective with implications for sustainable urban transport in China[J]. DISP151,2002,4:4-14
[48]Kirkwood, N. Manufactured sites:rethinking the post-industrial landscape[M]. London: Spon Press,2001
[49]Koopmans, T. C. & Beckmann, M. J. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities[J]. Econometrica,1957,25 (1):53-76
[50]Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M. & Sullivan, W. C. Transforming inner-city landscapes:trees, sense of safety, and preference[J]. Environment and Behavior,1998,30 (1):28-59
[51]Leigh, N. G. Focus:environmental constraints to brownfield redevelopment (introduction) [J]. Economic Development Quarterly,1994,8 (4):325-328
[52]Lenton, T. M., Held, H. & Kriegler, E. et al. Tipping elements in the earth's climate system[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2008,105(6):1786-1793
[53]Lerner, S. & Poole, W. The economic benefits of parks and open space[M]. San Francisco, CA:The Trust for Public Land,1999
[54]Lopez, R. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese[J]. American Journal of Public Health,2004,94 (9):1574-1579
[55]Mah, A. Urban planning and monitoring changes using ER Mapper[J/OL]. http://www. gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/2000/ts12/laus0009.asp,2009-08-16
[56]Malhi, Y. B. & Jarvis, P. G. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal for-ests Plant[J]. Cell and Environment,1999, (22):715-740
[57]Malpezzi, S. Estimates of the measurement and determinants of urban sprawl in U.S. metropolitan areas[M]. Madison, WI:Center for Urban land Economics Research, U niversity of Wisconsin,1999
[58]Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W. A. & Ramos Gonzalez, O. M. Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007,79 (3-4):288-297
[59]Meyer, P. B., Williams, R. H. & Yount, K. R. Contaminated land:reclamation, redevelopment and reuse in the United States and European Union[M]. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishers,1995
[60]More, T. A., Stevens, T. H. & Allen, P. G. The economics of urban parks:a benefit/cost analysis[J]. Parks and Recreation,1982,17(8):31-33
[61]Nakazawa, T. Variarion and cycles of carbon dioxiode and merhane[J]. Global Environmental Research,1997, (2):5-14
[62]Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J. Sustainability and cities:overcoming automobile dependence[M]. Washington, D.C.:Island Press,2007:94-111
[63]Norman, J., MacLean, H. L. & Kennedy, C. A. Comparing high and low residential density:life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development,2006,132 (1):10-21
[64]Nuissl, H., Haase, D. & Lanzendorf, M. et al. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions-a context-sensitive approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2009,26(2):414-424
[65]OECD. Decoupling:a conceptual overview[M]. Paris:OCED,2001
[66]OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressures for economic growth[M]. Paris:OECD,2002
[67]OECD. Environmental indicators-development, measurement and use[M]. Paris:OECD, 2003
[68]Page, G. W. Contaminated sites and environmental cleanup:international approaches to prevention, remediation, and reuse[M]. New York:Academic Press,1997
[69]Pahl, R. E. Whose city:and further essays on urban. society[M]. Harmondsworth UK: Penguin Books,1975
[70]Petrov, L. O., Lavalle, C. & Kasanko, M. Urban land use scenarios for a tourist region in Europe:applying the MOLAND model to Algarve, Portugal[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2009,92 (1):10-23
[71]Rosenthal, S. S. & Helsley, R. W. Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1994,35 (2):182-200
[72]'Sadownik, B. & Jaccard, M. Sustainable energy and urban form in China:the relevance of community energy management[J]. Energy Policy,2001,29 (11):55-65
[73]Sadownik, B. & Jaccard, M. Shaping sustainable energy use in Chinese cities:the relevance of community energy management[J]. DISP 151,2002,4:15-22
[74]Scott, A. J. The urban land nexus and the state[M]. London:Pion Limited,1980
[75]Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K. & Turner, S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,49(3-4):163-178
[76]Shimada, K., Tanaka, Y. & Gomi, K. et al. Developing a long-term local society design methodology towards a low-carbon economy:an application to Shiga Prefecture in Japan[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35 (9):4688-4703
[77]Simons, R. Turning brownfields into greenbacks:redeveloping and financing contaminated urban real estate[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute.1998
[78]Ho, C.S. & Fong, W. K. Planning for low carbon cities:the case of Iskandar development region, Malaysia[R]. Seminar towards Establishing Sustainable Planning and Governance Ⅱ, Seoul,2007
[79]Solow, R. M. Congestion cost and the use of land for streets [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1973,4 (2):602-618
[80]Stern, N. The economics of climate change:the Stern review[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2006
[81]Taaffe, H.J., Morrill, R. L. & Gould, P. R. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries:a comparative analysis[J]. Geographical Review,1963,53 (4):503-529
[82]Thapa, R. B. & Murayama, Y. Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques::a case study of Hanoi[J]. Land Use Policy,2008,25 (2):225-239
[83]Thompson, J. W. & Sorvig,K. Sustainable landscape construction:a guide to green building outdoors[M]. Washington DC:Island Press,2000
[84]Tkach, R. J. & Simonovic, S. P. A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources[J]. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis,1997, (1):25-43
[85]Tony, P. N. Environmental stress and urban policy[A]. In:Jenks, M., Burton, E. & Williams, K. (eds.). The compact city-a sustainable urban form? London:E. & F. N. Spon,1996:200-211
[86]Treffers, D. J., Faaij. A. P. C. & Sparkman, J. et al. Exploring the possibilities for setting up sustainable energy systems for the long term:two visions for the Dutch energy system in 2050[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33 (13):1723-1743
[87]Turkstra, J. Urban growth and land use options for lower-income groups:a case study of Villavicencio, Colombia[J]. ITC Journal,1996, (1):57-63
[88]Tyrvainen, L. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2001,62 (1):75-92
[89]UNFCCC. The marrakesh accords & the marrakesh declaration[EB/OL]. http://unfccc. int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf
[90]Uy, P. D. & Nakagoshi, N. Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban greenspace planning in Hanoi, Vietnam[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008,7 (1):25-40
[91]Verburg, P. H., Schot, P. P. & Dijst, M. J. et al. Land use change modelling:current practice and research priorities[J]. GeoJournal,2004,61 (4):309-324
[92]Webber, M. M. The urban place and the nonplace urban realm[A]. In:Webber, M. M., Dyckman, J. W. & Foley, D. L. et al(eds.). Explorations into urban structure. Philadephia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press,1964:79-153
[93]Wei, J., Zhou, J. & Tian, J.l. et al. Decoupling soil erosion and human activities on the Chinese loess plateau in the 20th century [J]. CATENA,2006, (68):10-15
[94]Wheaton, W. C. Urban residential growth under perfect foresight[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1982,12 (1):1-21
[95]Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. & Handley, J. E. City form and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001, (57):91-103
[96]Williams, K. Urban intensification policies in England:problems and contradictions [J]. Land Use Policy,1999,16 (3):167-178
[97]Williams, K., Burton, E. & Jenks, M. Achieving the compact city through intensification: an acceptable option? [A]. In:Jenks, M., Burton, E. & Williams, K. (eds.). The compact city-a sustainable urban form? London:E. & F. N. Spon,1996:83-96
[98]Larsen, J. & Heilmayr, R. A comparison of legislative climate change targets in the 110th congress[M]. Washington, DC:World Resources Institute,2008
[99]Yang, F., Zeng, G. M. & Du, C. Y. et al. Spatial analyzing system for urban land-use management based on GIS and multi-criteria assessment modeling[J]. Progress in Natural Science,2008,18 (10):1279-1284
[100]Yeh, A. G. O. & Li, X. Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,1998,12(2):169-189
[101]Young, K. Essay on the study of urban politcs[M]. London:Macmillan Press,1975
[102]安文,史珍和何晓晴.循环经济实践的国际比较及其科技基础研究[J].资源与产业,2006,(5)：92-95
[103]安旭东,周生路和彭补拙.发达地区城市土地可持续管理评估实践研究[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6)：749-756
[104][美]奥利弗.吉勒姆著.叶齐茂等译.无边的城市：论战城市蔓延[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007：115-119
[105]柏晶伟.尽快建立资源环境产权制度—与国家发改委宏观经济研究院常修泽教授的对话[N].中国经济时报,2009-12-24
[106]鲍健强,苗阳和陈锋.低碳经济：人类经济发展方式的新变革[J].中国工业经济,2008,(4)：153-160
[107]陈百明,杜红亮.试论耕地占用与GDP增长的脱钩研究[J].资源科学,2006,(5)：36-42
[108]陈秉钊.城市,紧凑而生态[J].城市规划学刊,2008(3)：28-31
[109]陈成,郭贯成和王楠君.循环经济与土地资源的可持续利用[J].国土资源科技管理,2005,22(6)：93-96
[110]陈飞.高层建筑风环境研究[J].建筑学报,2008,(2)：72-77
[111]陈文颖,吴宗鑫.用MARKAL模型研究中国未来可持续能源发展战略[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2001,41(12)：103-106
[112]陈晓红,徐选华和曾爱群.信用担保业务自动化决策支持系统研究[J].系统工程,2004,22(10)：75-79
[113]陈育庭.中学各科学习系统自组织现象及序参量[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,(4)：126-130
[114]陈志刚,黄贤金.经济发达地区上地资源可持续利用评价研究—以江苏省江阴市为例[J].资源科学,2001,23(3)：33-38
[115]陈志辉,祝甲山.浅议城市土地利用及其评价[J].城市问题,2002,(6)：62-63
[116]崔大鹏.适应性排放的概念分析[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[117]戴汝为,王钰和田捷.智能系统的综合集成[M].杭州：浙江科学技术出版社,1995：103-110
[118]邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,2005
[119]丁成日,宋彦.城市规划与空间结构—城市可持续发展战略[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005：132-139,265-273
[120]方创琳,毛汉英.区域发展规划指标体系建立方法探讨[J].地理学报,1999,(5)：410-419
[121]方精云,陈安平和赵淑清等.中国森林生物量的估算：对Fang等science—文(Scienee2001, (29):2320-2322)的若干说明[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(2)：243-249
[122]方精云,刘国华和徐嵩龄.我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J].生态学报,1996,16(5)：497-508
[123]方精云,唐艳鸿和林俊达等.全球生态学气候变化与生态响应[M].高等教育出版社,SPringer出版社,2000
[124]冯之浚,牛文元.低碳经济与科学发展[J].中国软科学,2009,(8)：13-19
[125]傅立.灰色系统理论及应用[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1992
[126]付允,汪云林和李丁.低碳城市的发展路径研究[J].科学对社会的影响,2008(2)：5-10
[127][美]格里特.J.纳普著.国士资源部信息中心译.土地市场监控与城市理性发展[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2003
[128][美]格里特.J.纳普,阿瑟.C.纳尔逊著.国土资源部信息中心译.土地规划管理[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2003
[129]葛向东,彭补拙和濮励杰等.耕地总量动态平衡的监测和预警研究[J].自然资源学报,2002a,17(1)：35-41
[130]葛向东,张侠和彭补拙等.耕地存量临界警戒和耕地非农占用成本的警度修正方法初探[J].地理科学,2002b,22(2)：166-170
[131]顾桂梅.城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2008,25(4)：480-483
[132]国际能源署.能源技术展望—面向2050年的情景与战略[M].张阿玲等译.北京：清华大学出版社,2009：11-52
[133]国际能源署.世界能源展望2006：综述和结论[EB/OL]. http://www.worldenergyoutloo k.org/docs/weo2006/chinese_sum_06.pdf
[134]国家发展和改革委员会.中国应对气候变化国家方案[EB/OL]. http://www.ccchina.gov. cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File189.pdf
[135][德]哈肯著.杨炳奕译.协同学：理论与应用[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1990
[136]侯学钢,彭再德.上海城市功能转变与地域空间结构优化[J].城市规划,1997,(4)：8-11
[137]胡鞍钢.“绿猫”模式的新内涵—低碳经济[J].世界环境,2008,(2)：26-28
[138]胡秀莲,刘强和姜克隽.中国减缓部门碳排放的技术潜力分析[J].中外能源,2007,12(4)：1-8
[139]胡振琪,王霖琳.土地资源领域发展循环经济的基本思路与对策[J].国土资源科技管理,2006,23(5)：13-16
[140]华楠,江景波.城市土地利用系统动态分析模型[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1997,25(1)： 92-97
[141]黄绿筠,吕欣苗.推进循环经济发展促进土地可持续利用[J].生态经济,2004,(12)：79-82
[142]黄鹏.关于我国城市土地利用预警体系的探讨[J].广东土地科学,2006,5(4)：15-18
[143]黄贤金,钟太洋.区域循环经济发展评价[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006
[144]黄贤金.循环经济：产业模式与政策体系[M].南京：南京大学出版社,2004：156
[145]蒋金荷.从发展目标分析中国未来碳排放空间需求[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[146]姜克隽,胡秀莲和庄幸等.中国2050年低碳情景和低碳发展之路[J].中外能源,2009,14(6)：1-7
[147]江林茜.论国土资源管理的社会预警系统研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2001,18(5)：25-28
[148]姜硕,冯科.循环经济下国土资源配置的宏观调控研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(23)：6348-6350
[149]焦胜,曾光明和何理等.生态城市指标体系的不确定性研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(1)：75-78
[150]金涌,王垚和胡山鹰等.低碳经济：理念.实践.创新[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(9)：4-13
[151]荆树庄,范周.城市土地可持续利用的对策研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,1999,9(3)：55-57
[152]科学网.中科院发出警告：循环经济存在风险,绿色GDP目前不具可行性[EB/OL]. h ttp://www.cug.edu.cn/new/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=7905
[153]李翅.土地集约利用的城市空间发展模式[J].城市规划学刊,2006,(1)：49-55
[154]李凤全,章明卓和胡忠行等.城乡交错带土地利用生态经济预警研究[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,28(3)：330-334
[155]李光禄,牛哲莉.欧盟的棕色地块立法及对我国的启示[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(4)：13-18
[156]李坚明,孙一菱和庄敏芳.台湾二氧化碳排放脱钩指标建立与评估[A].两岸环境保护与永续发展研讨会论文集[C].台北：“中华发展基金管理委员会,”2005
[157]李建勋.美国应对“棕色地块效应”的对策及启示[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2008,23(3)：107-112
[158]厉伟,李银和但承龙等.城市化进程中土地持续利用评价的实证研究—以南京市为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(2)：65-70
[159]黎夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统[J].地理研究,2005,24(1)：19-27
[160]李颖,黄贤金和甄峰.区域不同土地利用方式的碳排放效应分析—以江苏省为例[J/OL]. http://www.cnlrn.org/newsAction.do?method=viewNews&cIassId=020010350000 000760&newsId=020010040000014218,2009-06-13
[161]李植斌.城市土地可持续利用理论与评价[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,1999：15-18
[162]李植斌.城市土地可持续利用评价研究[J].浙江师大学报(自然科学版),2000,23(1)：68-73
[163]粱湖清.生态城市土地可持续利用[M].广州：广东经济出版社,2003：122-196
[164]梁湖清.循环经济与城市土地可持续利用[J].学术研究,2004,(7)：37-40
[165]林宁,马才学.土地可持续利用多指标综合预警技术研究—以湖北省为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(4)：105-111
[166]刘传江,冯碧梅.低碳经济对武汉城市圈建设“两型社会”的启示[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2009,19(5)：16-21
[167]刘冬荣,胡卫星.循环经济：土地利用的新理念[J].国土资源导刊(湖南),2005,2(4)：19-21
[168]刘利锋,陆红生.城乡交错区土地可持续利用及其评价指标体系研究[J].现代城市研究,2000,(3)：44-46
[169]刘灵辉,陈银蓉和石伟伟.基于模糊综合评价法的柳州市土地集约利用评价[J].广东上地科学,2007,6(3)：25-28
[170]刘绍辉,方精云.上壤呼吸的影响因素及全球尺度下温度的影响[J].生态学报,1997,(5)：19-26
[171]刘盛和,吴传钧和陈田.评析西方城市士地利用的理论研究[J].地理研究,2001,20：(1)：111-119
[172]刘卫东.城市土地持续利用研究的任务[J].中国土地,1996,(12)：15-16
[173]刘怡君,付允和江云林.国家低碳城市发展的战略问题[J].建设科技,2009,(15)： 44-45
[174][日]柳下正治.上智三菱UFJ環境講座[R].脱温暖化社会のための政策裸题,上智大学大学院地球環境学研究科,2007
[175]刘艳芳.多尺度耕地供需动态平衡预警体系研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(5)：420-425
[176]刘彦随.区域土地利用优化配置[M].北京：学苑出版社,1999：28-102
[177]刘友兆,曲福田和石志宽.经济发达地区土地资源可持续利用方式诊断[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2002,12(2)：91-95
[178]刘志全,石利利.英国的污染土地风险管理与修复技术[J].环境保护,2005,(10)：69-73
[179]罗嘉明.城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以南京市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(2)：119-121
[180][美]罗莎琳德.格林斯坦,耶西姆.松古-埃耶尔马兹著.丁成日等译.循环城市—城市土地利用与再利用[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007
[181]罗思东.美国城市的棕色地块及其治理[J].城市问题,2002,(6)：64-67
[182]马凯.经济增长方式的转变[J].科学决策,2004(5)：2-8
[183]马强.走向“精明增长”：从“小汽车城市”到“公共交通城市”[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007：218-221
[184]毛子军.森林生态系统碳平衡估测方法及其研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(6)731-738
[185]梅建屏,徐健和金晓斌等.基于不同出行方式的城市微观主体碳排放研究[J].资源开发与市场,2009,25(1)：49-52
[186]牛文元.低碳经济是落实科学发展观的重要突破口[J].中国科技奖励,2009.(3)：19
[187]潘海啸,汤諹和吴锦瑜等.中国“低碳城市”的空间规划策略[J].城市规划学刊.2008,(6)：57-64
[188]潘家华.人文发展分析的概念构架与经验数据—以对碳排放空间的需求为例[J].中国社会科学,2002,(6)：15-25
[189]潘家华.长期碳排放需求与低碳发展路径的几个方法学问题[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[190]潘家华.低碳发展的社会经济与技术分析[A].见：滕藤,郑玉歆.可持续发展的理念,制度与政策.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2004,223-262
[191]潘杰华,黄贤金.南京市耕地资源供求态势及警情分析[J].江苏农业科学,2001,(6)：47-50
[192]潘雄锋.城市建设和经济协同发展系统灰色关联分析与建模[J].科技管理研究,2005,(10)：43-45
[193]彭补拙,魏金佛和张燕.城市边缘区耕地预警系统的研究—以温州市为例[J].经济地理,2001,21(6)：714-718
[194]彭杰.城乡结合部土地利用环境预警系统研究[J].嘉兴学院学报,2008,20(2)：60-65
[195]彭澎,蔡莉.基于协同学理论的高技术产业集群生成主要影响因素研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,(1)：72-78
[196]钱杰.大都市碳源碳汇研究—以上海市为例[D].博士学位论文,华东师范大学,2004：12-13
[197]清华大学建筑节能研究中心.中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告2008[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2008：17-32
[198]仇保兴.紧凑度和多样性—我国城市可持续发展的核心理念[J].城市规划,2006,30(11)：18-24
[199]人民银行金融研究所课题组.创建配额交易制落实节能减排,大幅扩大农业投资[N].上海证券报,2008-06-14
[200]任平,周介铭和何伟等.城市土地可持续利用综合评价方法研究[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,28(6)：737-740
[201]上海国际环保产业网.全面创新推进科学发展共建和谐社会[EB/OL]. http://www.shep i. org.cn/news01_01.asp?ID=148&page=2
[202]石火学.循环经济与福建省土地资源的可持续利用[J].能源与环境,2006,(3)：18-19
[203]石建平.良性循环的理论及其调控机制：循环经济研究新视角[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2006：247-249
[204]史培军,陈晋和潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(2)：151-160
[205]石瑞年,李晓东.基于循环经济的城市土地可持续利用[J].资源与产业,2008,10(3)：25-28
[206]宋春华.建筑节能仟重道远,降耗减排大有可为[J].建筑装饰材料世界,2008,(5)：11-17
[207]苏瑾.赢余：低碳经济的成长[J].世界环境,2007,(4)：32-34
[208]苏珍,吴克宁和吕巧灵.统筹区域土地利用促进循环经济发展[J].中国国土资源经济,2007,20(2)：25-27
[209]谭丹,黄贤金.我国东、中、西部地区经济发展与碳排放的关联分析及比较[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008,18(3)：54-57
[210]谭永忠,吴次芳和叶智宣等.城市土地可持续利用评价的指标体系与方法[J].中国软科学,2003,(3)：139-143
[211]唐礼彬,李忠云.基于循环经济的土地储备法律机制研究[J].中国国土资源经济,2008,21(1)：24-26
[212]陶青山,李江风和王建龙.土地可持续利用预警研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(2)：508-509
[213][美]特里.S.索尔德,阿曼多.卡伯内尔著.丁成日等译.理性增长—形式与后果[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007
[214]王秉建,程久苗和张明锋等.工业化进程中城市土地可持续利用评价—以合肥市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(1)：28-30
[215]王慧敏,仇蕾.资源-环境-经济复合系统诊断预警方法与应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2007：15-16：21
[216]王家庭.基于低碳经济视角的我国城市发展模式研究[J].江西社会科学,2010(3)：85-89
[217]王建龙,李江风.土地利用预警系统研究[J].资源开发与市场,2006,22(4)：358-360
[218]王力.区域土地资源的可持续利用与监测预警研究[D].博士学位论文,西南农业大学,1997：83-91
[219]王良健,陈浮.区域土地资源可持续管理评估研究—以广西梧州市为例[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(3)：200-205
[220]王明霞.脱钩理论在浙江循环经济发展模式中的运用[J].林业经济,2006,(12)：40-43
[221]王舒,黄贤金和陈逸.区域循环经济发展评价的应用研究—以江苏省为例[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(1)：110-113
[222]汪严明.低碳经济及其国内部分专家学者的观点[EB/OL]. http://zzw.daqing.gov.cn/zua njiazixun/145243287005954048/20090720/335437.html"
[223]汪友结,吴次芳和罗文斌等.基于循环经济的城市土地利用评价研究—以安徽省芜湖市为例[J].中国土地科学,2008a,22(4)：25-31
[224]汪友结,吴次芳和罗文斌等.基于循环经济和多属性群决策的区域城市土地利用评价分类研究[J].技术经济,2008b,27(8)：47-53,56
[225]韦亚平,赵民.紧凑城市发展与土地利用绩效的测度—“屠能-阿隆索”模型的扩展与应用[J].城市规划学刊,2008,(3)：32-40
[226]吴昌华.城市引领中国低碳经济转型[J].中国投资,2009,(2)：116
[227]吴大进.协同学原理和应用[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,1990
[228]吴文盛,朱军.耕地资源的安全评价与预警[J].国土经济,2002,(11)：20-22
[229]吴晓青.关于中国发展低碳经济的若干建议[J].环境保护,2008,(5)：22-23
[230]吴玉鸣,张燕.中国区域经济增长与环境的祸合协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2008,(1)：25-30
[231]夏堃堡.发展低碳经济,实现城市可持续发展[J].环境保护,2008,(3)：33-35
[232]谢俊奇.可持续土地利用系统研究[J].中国土地科学,1999,13(4)：35-38
[233]徐楚年.植物生产概论[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1997
[234]徐春堂.生态城市土地利用系统的系统动力学分析[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(8)：18-23
[235]杨国锐.低碳城市发展路径与制度创新[J].城市问题,2010(7)：44-48
[236]杨战社.循环经济理念下的城市土地利用规划方略[J].西安工程科技学院学报,2007a,21(2)：249-252
[237]杨战社.基于循环经济的中小城市规划研究[D].博士学位论文,西安建筑科技大学,2007b：78-85
[238]姚愉芳.满足发展潜力下的中国能源需求研究[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[239]叶长盛,董玉祥.广州市人居环境可持续发展水平综合评价[J].热带地理,2003,23(1)：59-61
[240]叶晓敏.城市闲置土地的分布特征与形成机理研究—以杭州市主城区为例[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2009：21-26
[241]尹君.可持续土地利用内涵及其评价指标体系研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2001,24(1)： 78-81
[242]游雪晴,罗晖.“低碳经济”离我们还有多远?[N].科技日报,2007-07-22
[243]于开芹,李新举和常明.泰安市城市土地可持续利用的综合评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(3)：44-48
[244]袁俊,鲁励夫.’基于人工神经网络的城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以武汉市为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(5)：21-25
[245]袁丽丽.城市土地可持续利用评价研究综述[J].咸宁学院学报,2006,26(3)：21-24
[246]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].北京：科学出版社,2003
[247]咎欣.决策方法与客户分类[M].北京：对外经济贸易大学出版社,2007
[248]张波,郑新奇.济南市土地可持续利用研究[J].地域研究与开发,2001,20(4)：56-58
[249]张光宏,王秀兰.耕地预警初探[j].山区开发,2001,(9)：27-30
[250]张坤民.低碳世界中的中国：地位、挑战与战略[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008,18(3)：1-7
[251]张丽琴.城市土地利用评价指标体系构建[J].资源开发与市场,2003,19(5)：278-280
[252]章升东,宋维明和何宇.国际碳基金发展概述[J].林业经济,2007,(7)：47-48
[253]张世钢.改变传统观念,推行低碳经济[R].纪念6.5世界环境日暨第四届中国跨越式发展国际论坛和第七届中国贝迩年会,北京,2008
[254]张世秋.生态文明是一个现实问题[N].科学时报,2008-10-30
[255]张侠.县域土地资源可持续利用的评价与预警研究[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2002：125-152
[256]张晓林.代价论是错误的[J].求是,1996(9)：48
[257]张秀梅,李升峰和黄贤金等.江苏省1996年至2007年碳排放效应及时空格局分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(4)：768-775
[258]张伟.LEAP模型及其在我国建筑物用能情景分析中的应用[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[259]赵行妹.中国农村能源消费的趋势和面临的挑战[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[260]赵姚阳,濮励杰和卜崇峰.基于模糊逻辑的城市土地集约化利用评价—以江苏省地级城市为例[J].人文地理,2006,(1)：17-20
[261]郑晓俐,乐晶.循环经济下的城市土地管理[J].池州学院学报,2008,22(4)：38-40
[262]郑新奇.城市土地优化配置与集约利用评价：理论、方法、技术、实证[M].北京：科学出版社,2004：163-182
[263]中国国土资源网.低碳经济怎样影响土地管理[J/OL]. http://www.clr.cn/front/read/read. asp?ID=203592
[264]中国环境与发展国际合作委员会.中国发展低碳经济途径研究[EB/OL]. http://www.cc iced.org/zlk_1/cbw/procedings/sijieerci/ktzbg/200909/P020090904309839999970.pdf
[265]中国信息报.发展低碳经济,促进发展方式转变[EB/OL]. http://www.clciu.org.cn/benc andy.php?fid=41&id=808发展低碳经济
[266]诸大建.低碳经济能成为新的经济增长点吗[N].解放日报,2009-06-22
[267]诸大建.中国循环经济与可持续发展[M].北京：科学出版社,2007：118-120
[268]朱红波,刘海容.循环经济与可持续土地利用规划[J].生态经济,2005,(1 0)：61-63
[269]朱晓华,蔡运龙和蒋为国等.自组织的土地利用系统[J].国土地科学,2005,19(2)：21-28
[270]朱照宇,邓清禄和匡耀求等.土地资源质量及可持续利用宏观评价指标与TLEL模式[.J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2001,26(2)：217-220
[271]庄贵阳.节能减排与中国经济的低碳发展[J].气候变化研究进展,2008,4(5)：303-308
[272]庄贵阳.中国经济低碳发展的途径与潜力分析[J].国际技术经济研究,2005,8(3)：79-87
[2]Amarsaikhan, D., Ganzorig, M. & Saandar, M. Urban change study using RS and GIS[J]. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics,2001,2 (2):73-78
[3]Andrianasolo, H. & Nghi, D. Q. Assessment of map certainty on urban growth using remote sensing and GIS integration[C]. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Hong Kong,1999:618-622
[4]Asante-Duah, D. K. Management of contaminated site problems[M]. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press,1996
[5]Bardo, J, W. & Hartman, J. J. Urban sociology:a systematic introduction[M]. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers,1982
[6]Barker, T., Junankar, S. & Pollitt, H. et al. The macroeconomic effects of unilateral environmental tax reforms in Europe,1995-2012[A]. In:Cottrell, J., Milne, J. E. & Ashiabor, H. et al. (eds.). Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation-Volume Ⅵ: International and Comparative Perspectives. Brampton, ON:Oxford University Press-Canada,2009:23-33
[7]Campbell, H. S. Urban land use:residential patterns and change[J/OL]. http://www.un cc.edu/hscampbe/landuse/a-intro/intro.html.1998-06-22
[8]Capozza, D. R. & Helsley, R. W. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1989,26 (3):295-306
[9]Capozza, D. R. & Li, Y. M. The intensity and timing of investment:the case of land[J]. American Economic Review,1994.84 (4):889-904
[10]Chafer, M. & Wright, G. L. An analysis of land capability assessment using remotely sensed data[C]. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Conference on Remote Sensing, Melbourne,1994:601-608
[II]Chapin, F. S. & Kaiser, E. J. Urban land use planning[M]. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.1967
[12]Chicago Metropolis 2020. The metropolis plan:choices for the Chicago region(technical report) [EB/OL]. http://www.metropolisplan.org/Section%20I%20Metropolis%20Plan.pdf
[13]Cho, M. Congestion effects of spatial growth restrictions:a model and empirical analysis[J]. Real Estate Economics,1997.25 (3):409-438
[14]Cho, S. H., Poudyal, N. & Lambert, D. M. Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value[J]. Land Use Policy,2008,25 (3): 320-329
[15]CEC (Commission of the European Communities). Europe's climate change opportunity[M]. Brussels:CEC,2008
[16]Corburn, J. Urban land use, air toxics and public health:assessing hazardous exposures at the neighborhood scale[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2007,27(2): 145-160
[17]Cox, K. R., Reynolds, D. R. & Rokkan, S. Locational approaches to power and conflict[M]. New York:Halsted Press,1974
[18]Czogala, E. & Roubens, M. Approach to multi-criteria decision making problems using probabilistic set theory[J], European Journal of Operational Research,1989,43(3):263-266
[19]DeBell, R. Urban land use allocation model:an analysis of its purpose and an anal-ysis of its purpose and function[J/OL]. http://classweb.gmu.edu/dparker3/lumta_present /debell_presentation.pdf
[20]Deng, J. S., Wang, K. & Li, J. et al. Urban land use change detection using Multisensor satellite images[J]. Pedosphere,2009,19 (1):96-103
[21]Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Energy White Paper:creating a low carbon economy[M]. London:DTI,2003:22-73
[22]De Sousa, C. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development:a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the greater Toronto area[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2000,43 (6): 831-853
[23]De Sousa, C. Contaminated sites management:the Canadian situation in international context[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2001,62 (2):131-154
[24]De Sousa, C. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003.62 (4):181-198
[25]Dipasquale, D. & Wheaton, W. C. Urban economics and real estate markets[M]. En-glewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall,1996
[26]FAO. FESLM:an international framework for evaluating sustainable land manageme-nt[EB/OL]. http://nhjy.hzau.edu.cn/kech/2006/tdlygh/jxzy/en/feslm.pdf
[27]Ford, G., Macdonald, D. & Winfield, M. Who pays for past sins? policy issues surrounding contaminated site remediation in Canada[J]. Alternatives.1994,20 (4):28-34
[28]Form, W. H. The place of social structure in the determination of land use:some implications for a theory of urban ecology[J]. Social Forces,1954,32 (4):317-323
[29]Frederick Schneiders Research. Survey of state and local officials on liveable communities[M]. Washington DC:The American Institute of Architects,1999
[30]Fried, M. Residential attachment:sources of residential and community satisfaction[J]. Journal of Social Issues,1982,38 (3):107-119
[31]Fujita, M. Urban land use theory[A]. In:Lesourne, J. & Sonnenschein, H. (eds.). Location theory. New York:Harwood Academic Publishers,1986:73-149
[32]Garvin, A., Berens, G. & Leinberger, C. B. et al. Urban parks and open space[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute,1997
[33]Glaeser, E. L. & Kahn, M. E. The greenness of cities:carbon dioxide emissions and urban development[M]. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research,2008
[34]Goodall, C. How to live a low-carbon live:the individual's guide to stopping climate change[M]. London:Earthscan,2007
[35]Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K. & Mayer, H. et al. Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States[J]. The Environmentalist,2001,21 (2):129-143
[36]Haiyan, C., Beisi, J. & Lau, S. S. Y. Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy [J]. Habitat International,2008,32 (1):28-40
[37]Harnik, P. Inside city parks[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute,2000
[38]Harvey, D. Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution[J]. Regional Studies,1974,8 (3-4):239-255
[39]Hough, M. Cities and natural process[M]. London:Rutledge,1995:5-32
[40]Hough, M., Benson, B. & Evenson, J. Greening the Toronto port lands[M]. Toronto: Waterfront Regeneration Trust,1997:1-41
[41]IPCC. Climate Change 2001:The scientific basis[R]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001
[42]IPCC. Climate change 2007:synthesisreport[M]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Univ ersity Press,2007a
[43]IPCC. Climate change 2007:impacts, adaptation and vulnerability[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2007b
[44]Johnston, D., Lowe, R. J. & Bell, M. An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year2050[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33 (13):1635-1651
[45]Kaplan, R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1993,26 (1-4):193-201
[46]Kawase, R., Matsuoka, Y. & Fujino, J. Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission in long-term climate stabilization scenarios[J]. Energy Pol icy.2006,34 (15):2113-2122
[47]Kenworthy, J. & Hu, G. Transport and urban form in Chinese cities:an international comparative and policy perspective with implications for sustainable urban transport in China[J]. DISP151,2002,4:4-14
[48]Kirkwood, N. Manufactured sites:rethinking the post-industrial landscape[M]. London: Spon Press,2001
[49]Koopmans, T. C. & Beckmann, M. J. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities[J]. Econometrica,1957,25 (1):53-76
[50]Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M. & Sullivan, W. C. Transforming inner-city landscapes:trees, sense of safety, and preference[J]. Environment and Behavior,1998,30 (1):28-59
[51]Leigh, N. G. Focus:environmental constraints to brownfield redevelopment (introduction) [J]. Economic Development Quarterly,1994,8 (4):325-328
[52]Lenton, T. M., Held, H. & Kriegler, E. et al. Tipping elements in the earth's climate system[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2008,105(6):1786-1793
[53]Lerner, S. & Poole, W. The economic benefits of parks and open space[M]. San Francisco, CA:The Trust for Public Land,1999
[54]Lopez, R. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese[J]. American Journal of Public Health,2004,94 (9):1574-1579
[55]Mah, A. Urban planning and monitoring changes using ER Mapper[J/OL]. http://www. gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/2000/ts12/laus0009.asp,2009-08-16
[56]Malhi, Y. B. & Jarvis, P. G. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal for-ests Plant[J]. Cell and Environment,1999, (22):715-740
[57]Malpezzi, S. Estimates of the measurement and determinants of urban sprawl in U.S. metropolitan areas[M]. Madison, WI:Center for Urban land Economics Research, U niversity of Wisconsin,1999
[58]Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W. A. & Ramos Gonzalez, O. M. Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007,79 (3-4):288-297
[59]Meyer, P. B., Williams, R. H. & Yount, K. R. Contaminated land:reclamation, redevelopment and reuse in the United States and European Union[M]. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishers,1995
[60]More, T. A., Stevens, T. H. & Allen, P. G. The economics of urban parks:a benefit/cost analysis[J]. Parks and Recreation,1982,17(8):31-33
[61]Nakazawa, T. Variarion and cycles of carbon dioxiode and merhane[J]. Global Environmental Research,1997, (2):5-14
[62]Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J. Sustainability and cities:overcoming automobile dependence[M]. Washington, D.C.:Island Press,2007:94-111
[63]Norman, J., MacLean, H. L. & Kennedy, C. A. Comparing high and low residential density:life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development,2006,132 (1):10-21
[64]Nuissl, H., Haase, D. & Lanzendorf, M. et al. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions-a context-sensitive approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2009,26(2):414-424
[65]OECD. Decoupling:a conceptual overview[M]. Paris:OCED,2001
[66]OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressures for economic growth[M]. Paris:OECD,2002
[67]OECD. Environmental indicators-development, measurement and use[M]. Paris:OECD, 2003
[68]Page, G. W. Contaminated sites and environmental cleanup:international approaches to prevention, remediation, and reuse[M]. New York:Academic Press,1997
[69]Pahl, R. E. Whose city:and further essays on urban. society[M]. Harmondsworth UK: Penguin Books,1975
[70]Petrov, L. O., Lavalle, C. & Kasanko, M. Urban land use scenarios for a tourist region in Europe:applying the MOLAND model to Algarve, Portugal[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2009,92 (1):10-23
[71]Rosenthal, S. S. & Helsley, R. W. Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1994,35 (2):182-200
[72]'Sadownik, B. & Jaccard, M. Sustainable energy and urban form in China:the relevance of community energy management[J]. Energy Policy,2001,29 (11):55-65
[73]Sadownik, B. & Jaccard, M. Shaping sustainable energy use in Chinese cities:the relevance of community energy management[J]. DISP 151,2002,4:15-22
[74]Scott, A. J. The urban land nexus and the state[M]. London:Pion Limited,1980
[75]Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K. & Turner, S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,49(3-4):163-178
[76]Shimada, K., Tanaka, Y. & Gomi, K. et al. Developing a long-term local society design methodology towards a low-carbon economy:an application to Shiga Prefecture in Japan[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35 (9):4688-4703
[77]Simons, R. Turning brownfields into greenbacks:redeveloping and financing contaminated urban real estate[M]. Washington DC:Urban Land Institute.1998
[78]Ho, C.S. & Fong, W. K. Planning for low carbon cities:the case of Iskandar development region, Malaysia[R]. Seminar towards Establishing Sustainable Planning and Governance Ⅱ, Seoul,2007
[79]Solow, R. M. Congestion cost and the use of land for streets [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1973,4 (2):602-618
[80]Stern, N. The economics of climate change:the Stern review[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,2006
[81]Taaffe, H.J., Morrill, R. L. & Gould, P. R. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries:a comparative analysis[J]. Geographical Review,1963,53 (4):503-529
[82]Thapa, R. B. & Murayama, Y. Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques::a case study of Hanoi[J]. Land Use Policy,2008,25 (2):225-239
[83]Thompson, J. W. & Sorvig,K. Sustainable landscape construction:a guide to green building outdoors[M]. Washington DC:Island Press,2000
[84]Tkach, R. J. & Simonovic, S. P. A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources[J]. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis,1997, (1):25-43
[85]Tony, P. N. Environmental stress and urban policy[A]. In:Jenks, M., Burton, E. & Williams, K. (eds.). The compact city-a sustainable urban form? London:E. & F. N. Spon,1996:200-211
[86]Treffers, D. J., Faaij. A. P. C. & Sparkman, J. et al. Exploring the possibilities for setting up sustainable energy systems for the long term:two visions for the Dutch energy system in 2050[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33 (13):1723-1743
[87]Turkstra, J. Urban growth and land use options for lower-income groups:a case study of Villavicencio, Colombia[J]. ITC Journal,1996, (1):57-63
[88]Tyrvainen, L. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2001,62 (1):75-92
[89]UNFCCC. The marrakesh accords & the marrakesh declaration[EB/OL]. http://unfccc. int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf
[90]Uy, P. D. & Nakagoshi, N. Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban greenspace planning in Hanoi, Vietnam[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008,7 (1):25-40
[91]Verburg, P. H., Schot, P. P. & Dijst, M. J. et al. Land use change modelling:current practice and research priorities[J]. GeoJournal,2004,61 (4):309-324
[92]Webber, M. M. The urban place and the nonplace urban realm[A]. In:Webber, M. M., Dyckman, J. W. & Foley, D. L. et al(eds.). Explorations into urban structure. Philadephia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press,1964:79-153
[93]Wei, J., Zhou, J. & Tian, J.l. et al. Decoupling soil erosion and human activities on the Chinese loess plateau in the 20th century [J]. CATENA,2006, (68):10-15
[94]Wheaton, W. C. Urban residential growth under perfect foresight[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1982,12 (1):1-21
[95]Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. & Handley, J. E. City form and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001, (57):91-103
[96]Williams, K. Urban intensification policies in England:problems and contradictions [J]. Land Use Policy,1999,16 (3):167-178
[97]Williams, K., Burton, E. & Jenks, M. Achieving the compact city through intensification: an acceptable option? [A]. In:Jenks, M., Burton, E. & Williams, K. (eds.). The compact city-a sustainable urban form? London:E. & F. N. Spon,1996:83-96
[98]Larsen, J. & Heilmayr, R. A comparison of legislative climate change targets in the 110th congress[M]. Washington, DC:World Resources Institute,2008
[99]Yang, F., Zeng, G. M. & Du, C. Y. et al. Spatial analyzing system for urban land-use management based on GIS and multi-criteria assessment modeling[J]. Progress in Natural Science,2008,18 (10):1279-1284
[100]Yeh, A. G. O. & Li, X. Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,1998,12(2):169-189
[101]Young, K. Essay on the study of urban politcs[M]. London:Macmillan Press,1975
[102]安文,史珍和何晓晴.循环经济实践的国际比较及其科技基础研究[J].资源与产业,2006,(5)：92-95
[103]安旭东,周生路和彭补拙.发达地区城市土地可持续管理评估实践研究[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6)：749-756
[104][美]奥利弗.吉勒姆著.叶齐茂等译.无边的城市：论战城市蔓延[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007：115-119
[105]柏晶伟.尽快建立资源环境产权制度—与国家发改委宏观经济研究院常修泽教授的对话[N].中国经济时报,2009-12-24
[106]鲍健强,苗阳和陈锋.低碳经济：人类经济发展方式的新变革[J].中国工业经济,2008,(4)：153-160
[107]陈百明,杜红亮.试论耕地占用与GDP增长的脱钩研究[J].资源科学,2006,(5)：36-42
[108]陈秉钊.城市,紧凑而生态[J].城市规划学刊,2008(3)：28-31
[109]陈成,郭贯成和王楠君.循环经济与土地资源的可持续利用[J].国土资源科技管理,2005,22(6)：93-96
[110]陈飞.高层建筑风环境研究[J].建筑学报,2008,(2)：72-77
[111]陈文颖,吴宗鑫.用MARKAL模型研究中国未来可持续能源发展战略[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2001,41(12)：103-106
[112]陈晓红,徐选华和曾爱群.信用担保业务自动化决策支持系统研究[J].系统工程,2004,22(10)：75-79
[113]陈育庭.中学各科学习系统自组织现象及序参量[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,(4)：126-130
[114]陈志刚,黄贤金.经济发达地区上地资源可持续利用评价研究—以江苏省江阴市为例[J].资源科学,2001,23(3)：33-38
[115]陈志辉,祝甲山.浅议城市土地利用及其评价[J].城市问题,2002,(6)：62-63
[116]崔大鹏.适应性排放的概念分析[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[117]戴汝为,王钰和田捷.智能系统的综合集成[M].杭州：浙江科学技术出版社,1995：103-110
[118]邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,2005
[119]丁成日,宋彦.城市规划与空间结构—城市可持续发展战略[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2005：132-139,265-273
[120]方创琳,毛汉英.区域发展规划指标体系建立方法探讨[J].地理学报,1999,(5)：410-419
[121]方精云,陈安平和赵淑清等.中国森林生物量的估算：对Fang等science—文(Scienee2001, (29):2320-2322)的若干说明[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(2)：243-249
[122]方精云,刘国华和徐嵩龄.我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J].生态学报,1996,16(5)：497-508
[123]方精云,唐艳鸿和林俊达等.全球生态学气候变化与生态响应[M].高等教育出版社,SPringer出版社,2000
[124]冯之浚,牛文元.低碳经济与科学发展[J].中国软科学,2009,(8)：13-19
[125]傅立.灰色系统理论及应用[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1992
[126]付允,汪云林和李丁.低碳城市的发展路径研究[J].科学对社会的影响,2008(2)：5-10
[127][美]格里特.J.纳普著.国士资源部信息中心译.土地市场监控与城市理性发展[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2003
[128][美]格里特.J.纳普,阿瑟.C.纳尔逊著.国土资源部信息中心译.土地规划管理[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2003
[129]葛向东,彭补拙和濮励杰等.耕地总量动态平衡的监测和预警研究[J].自然资源学报,2002a,17(1)：35-41
[130]葛向东,张侠和彭补拙等.耕地存量临界警戒和耕地非农占用成本的警度修正方法初探[J].地理科学,2002b,22(2)：166-170
[131]顾桂梅.城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].新疆大学学报(自然科学版),2008,25(4)：480-483
[132]国际能源署.能源技术展望—面向2050年的情景与战略[M].张阿玲等译.北京：清华大学出版社,2009：11-52
[133]国际能源署.世界能源展望2006：综述和结论[EB/OL]. http://www.worldenergyoutloo k.org/docs/weo2006/chinese_sum_06.pdf
[134]国家发展和改革委员会.中国应对气候变化国家方案[EB/OL]. http://www.ccchina.gov. cn/WebSite/CCChina/UpFile/File189.pdf
[135][德]哈肯著.杨炳奕译.协同学：理论与应用[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,1990
[136]侯学钢,彭再德.上海城市功能转变与地域空间结构优化[J].城市规划,1997,(4)：8-11
[137]胡鞍钢.“绿猫”模式的新内涵—低碳经济[J].世界环境,2008,(2)：26-28
[138]胡秀莲,刘强和姜克隽.中国减缓部门碳排放的技术潜力分析[J].中外能源,2007,12(4)：1-8
[139]胡振琪,王霖琳.土地资源领域发展循环经济的基本思路与对策[J].国土资源科技管理,2006,23(5)：13-16
[140]华楠,江景波.城市土地利用系统动态分析模型[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1997,25(1)： 92-97
[141]黄绿筠,吕欣苗.推进循环经济发展促进土地可持续利用[J].生态经济,2004,(12)：79-82
[142]黄鹏.关于我国城市土地利用预警体系的探讨[J].广东土地科学,2006,5(4)：15-18
[143]黄贤金,钟太洋.区域循环经济发展评价[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006
[144]黄贤金.循环经济：产业模式与政策体系[M].南京：南京大学出版社,2004：156
[145]蒋金荷.从发展目标分析中国未来碳排放空间需求[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[146]姜克隽,胡秀莲和庄幸等.中国2050年低碳情景和低碳发展之路[J].中外能源,2009,14(6)：1-7
[147]江林茜.论国土资源管理的社会预警系统研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2001,18(5)：25-28
[148]姜硕,冯科.循环经济下国土资源配置的宏观调控研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(23)：6348-6350
[149]焦胜,曾光明和何理等.生态城市指标体系的不确定性研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(1)：75-78
[150]金涌,王垚和胡山鹰等.低碳经济：理念.实践.创新[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(9)：4-13
[151]荆树庄,范周.城市土地可持续利用的对策研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,1999,9(3)：55-57
[152]科学网.中科院发出警告：循环经济存在风险,绿色GDP目前不具可行性[EB/OL]. h ttp://www.cug.edu.cn/new/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=7905
[153]李翅.土地集约利用的城市空间发展模式[J].城市规划学刊,2006,(1)：49-55
[154]李凤全,章明卓和胡忠行等.城乡交错带土地利用生态经济预警研究[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,28(3)：330-334
[155]李光禄,牛哲莉.欧盟的棕色地块立法及对我国的启示[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(4)：13-18
[156]李坚明,孙一菱和庄敏芳.台湾二氧化碳排放脱钩指标建立与评估[A].两岸环境保护与永续发展研讨会论文集[C].台北：“中华发展基金管理委员会,”2005
[157]李建勋.美国应对“棕色地块效应”的对策及启示[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2008,23(3)：107-112
[158]厉伟,李银和但承龙等.城市化进程中土地持续利用评价的实证研究—以南京市为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(2)：65-70
[159]黎夏,叶嘉安.基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统[J].地理研究,2005,24(1)：19-27
[160]李颖,黄贤金和甄峰.区域不同土地利用方式的碳排放效应分析—以江苏省为例[J/OL]. http://www.cnlrn.org/newsAction.do?method=viewNews&cIassId=020010350000 000760&newsId=020010040000014218,2009-06-13
[161]李植斌.城市土地可持续利用理论与评价[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,1999：15-18
[162]李植斌.城市土地可持续利用评价研究[J].浙江师大学报(自然科学版),2000,23(1)：68-73
[163]粱湖清.生态城市土地可持续利用[M].广州：广东经济出版社,2003：122-196
[164]梁湖清.循环经济与城市土地可持续利用[J].学术研究,2004,(7)：37-40
[165]林宁,马才学.土地可持续利用多指标综合预警技术研究—以湖北省为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(4)：105-111
[166]刘传江,冯碧梅.低碳经济对武汉城市圈建设“两型社会”的启示[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2009,19(5)：16-21
[167]刘冬荣,胡卫星.循环经济：土地利用的新理念[J].国土资源导刊(湖南),2005,2(4)：19-21
[168]刘利锋,陆红生.城乡交错区土地可持续利用及其评价指标体系研究[J].现代城市研究,2000,(3)：44-46
[169]刘灵辉,陈银蓉和石伟伟.基于模糊综合评价法的柳州市土地集约利用评价[J].广东上地科学,2007,6(3)：25-28
[170]刘绍辉,方精云.上壤呼吸的影响因素及全球尺度下温度的影响[J].生态学报,1997,(5)：19-26
[171]刘盛和,吴传钧和陈田.评析西方城市士地利用的理论研究[J].地理研究,2001,20：(1)：111-119
[172]刘卫东.城市土地持续利用研究的任务[J].中国土地,1996,(12)：15-16
[173]刘怡君,付允和江云林.国家低碳城市发展的战略问题[J].建设科技,2009,(15)： 44-45
[174][日]柳下正治.上智三菱UFJ環境講座[R].脱温暖化社会のための政策裸题,上智大学大学院地球環境学研究科,2007
[175]刘艳芳.多尺度耕地供需动态平衡预警体系研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2004,29(5)：420-425
[176]刘彦随.区域土地利用优化配置[M].北京：学苑出版社,1999：28-102
[177]刘友兆,曲福田和石志宽.经济发达地区土地资源可持续利用方式诊断[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2002,12(2)：91-95
[178]刘志全,石利利.英国的污染土地风险管理与修复技术[J].环境保护,2005,(10)：69-73
[179]罗嘉明.城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以南京市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(2)：119-121
[180][美]罗莎琳德.格林斯坦,耶西姆.松古-埃耶尔马兹著.丁成日等译.循环城市—城市土地利用与再利用[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007
[181]罗思东.美国城市的棕色地块及其治理[J].城市问题,2002,(6)：64-67
[182]马凯.经济增长方式的转变[J].科学决策,2004(5)：2-8
[183]马强.走向“精明增长”：从“小汽车城市”到“公共交通城市”[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007：218-221
[184]毛子军.森林生态系统碳平衡估测方法及其研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(6)731-738
[185]梅建屏,徐健和金晓斌等.基于不同出行方式的城市微观主体碳排放研究[J].资源开发与市场,2009,25(1)：49-52
[186]牛文元.低碳经济是落实科学发展观的重要突破口[J].中国科技奖励,2009.(3)：19
[187]潘海啸,汤諹和吴锦瑜等.中国“低碳城市”的空间规划策略[J].城市规划学刊.2008,(6)：57-64
[188]潘家华.人文发展分析的概念构架与经验数据—以对碳排放空间的需求为例[J].中国社会科学,2002,(6)：15-25
[189]潘家华.长期碳排放需求与低碳发展路径的几个方法学问题[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[190]潘家华.低碳发展的社会经济与技术分析[A].见：滕藤,郑玉歆.可持续发展的理念,制度与政策.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2004,223-262
[191]潘杰华,黄贤金.南京市耕地资源供求态势及警情分析[J].江苏农业科学,2001,(6)：47-50
[192]潘雄锋.城市建设和经济协同发展系统灰色关联分析与建模[J].科技管理研究,2005,(10)：43-45
[193]彭补拙,魏金佛和张燕.城市边缘区耕地预警系统的研究—以温州市为例[J].经济地理,2001,21(6)：714-718
[194]彭杰.城乡结合部土地利用环境预警系统研究[J].嘉兴学院学报,2008,20(2)：60-65
[195]彭澎,蔡莉.基于协同学理论的高技术产业集群生成主要影响因素研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,(1)：72-78
[196]钱杰.大都市碳源碳汇研究—以上海市为例[D].博士学位论文,华东师范大学,2004：12-13
[197]清华大学建筑节能研究中心.中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告2008[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2008：17-32
[198]仇保兴.紧凑度和多样性—我国城市可持续发展的核心理念[J].城市规划,2006,30(11)：18-24
[199]人民银行金融研究所课题组.创建配额交易制落实节能减排,大幅扩大农业投资[N].上海证券报,2008-06-14
[200]任平,周介铭和何伟等.城市土地可持续利用综合评价方法研究[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,28(6)：737-740
[201]上海国际环保产业网.全面创新推进科学发展共建和谐社会[EB/OL]. http://www.shep i. org.cn/news01_01.asp?ID=148&page=2
[202]石火学.循环经济与福建省土地资源的可持续利用[J].能源与环境,2006,(3)：18-19
[203]石建平.良性循环的理论及其调控机制：循环经济研究新视角[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2006：247-249
[204]史培军,陈晋和潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(2)：151-160
[205]石瑞年,李晓东.基于循环经济的城市土地可持续利用[J].资源与产业,2008,10(3)：25-28
[206]宋春华.建筑节能仟重道远,降耗减排大有可为[J].建筑装饰材料世界,2008,(5)：11-17
[207]苏瑾.赢余：低碳经济的成长[J].世界环境,2007,(4)：32-34
[208]苏珍,吴克宁和吕巧灵.统筹区域土地利用促进循环经济发展[J].中国国土资源经济,2007,20(2)：25-27
[209]谭丹,黄贤金.我国东、中、西部地区经济发展与碳排放的关联分析及比较[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008,18(3)：54-57
[210]谭永忠,吴次芳和叶智宣等.城市土地可持续利用评价的指标体系与方法[J].中国软科学,2003,(3)：139-143
[211]唐礼彬,李忠云.基于循环经济的土地储备法律机制研究[J].中国国土资源经济,2008,21(1)：24-26
[212]陶青山,李江风和王建龙.土地可持续利用预警研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(2)：508-509
[213][美]特里.S.索尔德,阿曼多.卡伯内尔著.丁成日等译.理性增长—形式与后果[M].北京：商务印书馆,2007
[214]王秉建,程久苗和张明锋等.工业化进程中城市土地可持续利用评价—以合肥市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(1)：28-30
[215]王慧敏,仇蕾.资源-环境-经济复合系统诊断预警方法与应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2007：15-16：21
[216]王家庭.基于低碳经济视角的我国城市发展模式研究[J].江西社会科学,2010(3)：85-89
[217]王建龙,李江风.土地利用预警系统研究[J].资源开发与市场,2006,22(4)：358-360
[218]王力.区域土地资源的可持续利用与监测预警研究[D].博士学位论文,西南农业大学,1997：83-91
[219]王良健,陈浮.区域土地资源可持续管理评估研究—以广西梧州市为例[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(3)：200-205
[220]王明霞.脱钩理论在浙江循环经济发展模式中的运用[J].林业经济,2006,(12)：40-43
[221]王舒,黄贤金和陈逸.区域循环经济发展评价的应用研究—以江苏省为例[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(1)：110-113
[222]汪严明.低碳经济及其国内部分专家学者的观点[EB/OL]. http://zzw.daqing.gov.cn/zua njiazixun/145243287005954048/20090720/335437.html"
[223]汪友结,吴次芳和罗文斌等.基于循环经济的城市土地利用评价研究—以安徽省芜湖市为例[J].中国土地科学,2008a,22(4)：25-31
[224]汪友结,吴次芳和罗文斌等.基于循环经济和多属性群决策的区域城市土地利用评价分类研究[J].技术经济,2008b,27(8)：47-53,56
[225]韦亚平,赵民.紧凑城市发展与土地利用绩效的测度—“屠能-阿隆索”模型的扩展与应用[J].城市规划学刊,2008,(3)：32-40
[226]吴昌华.城市引领中国低碳经济转型[J].中国投资,2009,(2)：116
[227]吴大进.协同学原理和应用[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,1990
[228]吴文盛,朱军.耕地资源的安全评价与预警[J].国土经济,2002,(11)：20-22
[229]吴晓青.关于中国发展低碳经济的若干建议[J].环境保护,2008,(5)：22-23
[230]吴玉鸣,张燕.中国区域经济增长与环境的祸合协调发展研究[J].资源科学,2008,(1)：25-30
[231]夏堃堡.发展低碳经济,实现城市可持续发展[J].环境保护,2008,(3)：33-35
[232]谢俊奇.可持续土地利用系统研究[J].中国土地科学,1999,13(4)：35-38
[233]徐楚年.植物生产概论[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1997
[234]徐春堂.生态城市土地利用系统的系统动力学分析[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(8)：18-23
[235]杨国锐.低碳城市发展路径与制度创新[J].城市问题,2010(7)：44-48
[236]杨战社.循环经济理念下的城市土地利用规划方略[J].西安工程科技学院学报,2007a,21(2)：249-252
[237]杨战社.基于循环经济的中小城市规划研究[D].博士学位论文,西安建筑科技大学,2007b：78-85
[238]姚愉芳.满足发展潜力下的中国能源需求研究[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[239]叶长盛,董玉祥.广州市人居环境可持续发展水平综合评价[J].热带地理,2003,23(1)：59-61
[240]叶晓敏.城市闲置土地的分布特征与形成机理研究—以杭州市主城区为例[D].硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2009：21-26
[241]尹君.可持续土地利用内涵及其评价指标体系研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2001,24(1)： 78-81
[242]游雪晴,罗晖.“低碳经济”离我们还有多远?[N].科技日报,2007-07-22
[243]于开芹,李新举和常明.泰安市城市土地可持续利用的综合评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(3)：44-48
[244]袁俊,鲁励夫.’基于人工神经网络的城市土地可持续利用评价研究—以武汉市为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(5)：21-25
[245]袁丽丽.城市土地可持续利用评价研究综述[J].咸宁学院学报,2006,26(3)：21-24
[246]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].北京：科学出版社,2003
[247]咎欣.决策方法与客户分类[M].北京：对外经济贸易大学出版社,2007
[248]张波,郑新奇.济南市土地可持续利用研究[J].地域研究与开发,2001,20(4)：56-58
[249]张光宏,王秀兰.耕地预警初探[j].山区开发,2001,(9)：27-30
[250]张坤民.低碳世界中的中国：地位、挑战与战略[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008,18(3)：1-7
[251]张丽琴.城市土地利用评价指标体系构建[J].资源开发与市场,2003,19(5)：278-280
[252]章升东,宋维明和何宇.国际碳基金发展概述[J].林业经济,2007,(7)：47-48
[253]张世钢.改变传统观念,推行低碳经济[R].纪念6.5世界环境日暨第四届中国跨越式发展国际论坛和第七届中国贝迩年会,北京,2008
[254]张世秋.生态文明是一个现实问题[N].科学时报,2008-10-30
[255]张侠.县域土地资源可持续利用的评价与预警研究[M].北京：中国大地出版社,2002：125-152
[256]张晓林.代价论是错误的[J].求是,1996(9)：48
[257]张秀梅,李升峰和黄贤金等.江苏省1996年至2007年碳排放效应及时空格局分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(4)：768-775
[258]张伟.LEAP模型及其在我国建筑物用能情景分析中的应用[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[259]赵行妹.中国农村能源消费的趋势和面临的挑战[C].低碳发展路径暨研讨会会议纪要,北京,2003
[260]赵姚阳,濮励杰和卜崇峰.基于模糊逻辑的城市土地集约化利用评价—以江苏省地级城市为例[J].人文地理,2006,(1)：17-20
[261]郑晓俐,乐晶.循环经济下的城市土地管理[J].池州学院学报,2008,22(4)：38-40
[262]郑新奇.城市土地优化配置与集约利用评价：理论、方法、技术、实证[M].北京：科学出版社,2004：163-182
[263]中国国土资源网.低碳经济怎样影响土地管理[J/OL]. http://www.clr.cn/front/read/read. asp?ID=203592
[264]中国环境与发展国际合作委员会.中国发展低碳经济途径研究[EB/OL]. http://www.cc iced.org/zlk_1/cbw/procedings/sijieerci/ktzbg/200909/P020090904309839999970.pdf
[265]中国信息报.发展低碳经济,促进发展方式转变[EB/OL]. http://www.clciu.org.cn/benc andy.php?fid=41&id=808发展低碳经济
[266]诸大建.低碳经济能成为新的经济增长点吗[N].解放日报,2009-06-22
[267]诸大建.中国循环经济与可持续发展[M].北京：科学出版社,2007：118-120
[268]朱红波,刘海容.循环经济与可持续土地利用规划[J].生态经济,2005,(1 0)：61-63
[269]朱晓华,蔡运龙和蒋为国等.自组织的土地利用系统[J].国土地科学,2005,19(2)：21-28
[270]朱照宇,邓清禄和匡耀求等.土地资源质量及可持续利用宏观评价指标与TLEL模式[.J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2001,26(2)：217-220
[271]庄贵阳.节能减排与中国经济的低碳发展[J].气候变化研究进展,2008,4(5)：303-308
[272]庄贵阳.中国经济低碳发展的途径与潜力分析[J].国际技术经济研究,2005,8(3)：79-87
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |