国际技术创新研究前沿与学术群体可视化分析
|
摘要
在统计分析国际技术创新研究文献分布特征的前提下,基于科学计量学与文献计量学,通过引文分析、文献共被引分析、作者共被引分析、聚类分析、社会网络分析、词频分析等方法,运用最新的信息可视化技术,对国际技术创新研究前沿与学术群体进行计量分析。
通过文献统计分析,揭示1959-2008年间,国际技术创新研究文献的学科、时间、机构、国家或地区与期刊的分布特征。学科与期刊计量分析视角都表明,国际技术创新研究主要集中在管理学与经济学中,并且从技术创新研究的发展历史角度来看,已由经济学视角的研究而主要转向于管理学视角的研究；时间分布表明,20世纪90年代以来,技术创新研究备受学界的关注；机构与国家或地区分布视角显示,北美洲与欧洲的若干国家与大学,是国际技术创新研究的强势所在。
在绘制国际技术创新研究前沿文献共被引时区视角演进聚类知识图谱的基础上,计量分析显示,1959-2008年间,以10年作为时间分段的被引文献为知识基础,与之对应的施引文献的标题词表征的研究前沿及其研究主题以非线性模式演进,其中研究主题分别为：“20世纪60—70年代：技术创新的理论功能、经济效应及其与生产率的关系等方面”、“20世纪70年代—21世纪初：技术创新与政府政策的关系等方面”、“20世纪80年代—21世纪初：技术创新合作网络与技术进步的关系等方面”、“21世纪初：技术创新合作网络与技术学习的关系等方面”、“21世纪初：技术变迁与知识的关系等方面”；从被引文献对施引文献知识流作用的引文分析视角,以及技术创新动力学中的外源因素,即科技进步、社会需要、市场竞争与政府政策等方面,阐释了50年来,国际技术创新研究前沿及其研究主题的演进机制。
基于当代国际技术创新研究前沿文献共被引聚类视角演进聚类知识图谱,计量分析得知,施引文献的作者关键词表征其研究前沿及其研究主题,其中核心研究主题为“演化和知识理论为基础的创新链”；次级研究主题分别为“创新三螺旋与核心竞争力”、“基于资源观的企业研发与创新”、“国家创新系统下的合作创新与企业成长”；边缘研究主题分别为“行为医学与人口质量”、“工程设计与工程教育”、“生态毒理学与微污染物处理技术”、“新型临床检验与诊断”与“胚胎干细胞与基因技术”；从引文分析与技术创新动力学视角,诠释了产业及企业的“研发、创新与成长”是当代国际技术创新研究前沿知识群形成的内在纽带。
基于作者共被引分析,绘制当代国际技术创新研究聚类视角演进聚类知识图谱。计量结果表明,其存在8个主流学术群体,其所关注的主流研究领域分别为“基于演化视角的国家与产业创新系统”、“企业及产业的内生技术创新”、“演化视角的产业及企业创新与其成长”、“演化视角下的产业及企业创新与知识管理的关系”、“创新与知识溢出”、“开放式创新范式下的产业及企业研发与其成长的关系”、“产品创新绩效与知识管理的关系”、“基于动态能力的产业及企业创新与组织环境的关系”；从引文分析与技术创新动力学视角,阐明了产业及企业的“成长”与“研发、创新与知识”的关系,是当代国际技术创新研究主流学术群所密切关注的核心研究领域,也是各个主流学术群体之间发生引文关系,形成聚类的核心思想。
最后,对论文的研究工作进行了总结,并且讨论了其存在的不足,提出了进一步研究的方向。
On the premise of the distributing characteric of statistic analysis of the research document of international technological innovation, the dissertation analyzes the research fronts and science community on international technological innovation based on citation analysis and cluster analysis and social networks analysis and frequency analysis of biblometrics and scientometrics with the newest information visualization technology.
The dissertation opens up the distributing characteric of the subject and time and institution and country or area of the research document of international technology innovation from 1959 to 2008 by the statistic analysis of document. The view of subject and journal indicates that the research of international technology innovation centralizes on mostly management and economics, and mostly come about from the view of economics resesarch to the view of management research in view of the development history of the research of technological innovation; the distribution of time indicates that the academe had very much given its attention to the research of technological innovation since 90 age in 20 century; the distribution of institution and country or area indicates that some countries or areas and universities are the mightiness of international technological innovation in North Amercia and Europe.
On the base of the drawing the clustering mapping knowledge domain of document co-cited of evoluting of time-zone view of the research fronts on international technological innovation, cited document with 10 years becoming time slice serve as knowledge base from 1959 to 2008, and the computation outcome displays that the research fronts and research subjects denoted by title words of corresponding citing document are evoluted with nonlinear evolution model and the research subjects separately contralizes on "60-70 times in 20 century:the relation theory function of technological innovation and economic effect and productivity, etc.", "70 times in 20 century-21 century early:the relation between technological innovation and the government policy, etc ", "80 times in 20 century-21 century early:the relation between the collaborate network of technological network and technological progress, etc", "21 century early:the relation between the collaborate network of technological network and technological learning, etc", "21 century early:the relation between technological change and knowledge, etc"; the dissertation explains the evolution mechanism of the research fronts and research subjects of international technological innovation from point of view of citation analysis of cited document acting on citing document by knowledge flow and the extrinsic factor of technological innovation dynamics, including S&T advancement and social need and market competition and government policy lately 50 years, etc.
Based on the document co-cited analysis of the clustering mapping knowledge domain of evoluting of cluster view of the research fronts on the contemporary international technological innovation, the computation analysis knows that the descriptors of citing document express the research fronts and research subjects, and the core research subjects is "the innovation chain on the base of the theory of evolutionary and knowledge", the sub research subjects are separately "innovation triple helix and core competence" and "R&D and innovation of firm resource-based" and " collaboration innovation and the growth of firms under the national innovation system ", the edge research subjects are separately "behavior medicine and population quality" and "engineering design and engineering education" and "zoology toxicology and disposal technology of micropollutants" and "new pattern clinic test and diagnosis" and "embryo germ cells and gene technology"; the dissertation annotates that the R&D and innovation and growth of industry&firm is the inherence ligament of knowledge cluster forming of the research fronts of contemporary international technological innovation from point of view of citation analysis and technological innovation dynamics.
Based on the author co-cited analysis, the dissertation draws the clustering mapping knowledge domain of evoluting of cluster view of the research on contemporary international technological innovation, the computation outcome indicates that that there are 8 major mainstream science community in the research on contemporary international technological innovation, and the mainstream research domains that it pays attention to are separately"national and industrial innovation system in view of evolution"、"endogenesis technological innovation of firm&industry"、" innovation and growth of firm&industry in view of evolution"、"the relation between innovation and knowledge management of firm&industry under the view of evolution"、" innovation and knowledge spillover"、" the relation between R&D and growth of firm&industry under the of the paradigm of open innovation"、" the relation between the performance of product innovation and knowledge management"、"the relation between innovation and organization enviroment of firm&industry in view of dynamic capability"; the dissertation illustrates that the relation the growth of industry & firm and R&D and innovation and knowledge is the core research domains that the mainstream science community of the research on contemporary international technological innovation pay closely attention to, and the core thought that every mainstream science community takes place citation connection and forms cluster from point of view of citation analysis and technological innovation dynamics.
At last, the research work of the dissertation is summed up and discussised to its shortage, and put forword more research dirctions.
通过文献统计分析,揭示1959-2008年间,国际技术创新研究文献的学科、时间、机构、国家或地区与期刊的分布特征。学科与期刊计量分析视角都表明,国际技术创新研究主要集中在管理学与经济学中,并且从技术创新研究的发展历史角度来看,已由经济学视角的研究而主要转向于管理学视角的研究；时间分布表明,20世纪90年代以来,技术创新研究备受学界的关注；机构与国家或地区分布视角显示,北美洲与欧洲的若干国家与大学,是国际技术创新研究的强势所在。
在绘制国际技术创新研究前沿文献共被引时区视角演进聚类知识图谱的基础上,计量分析显示,1959-2008年间,以10年作为时间分段的被引文献为知识基础,与之对应的施引文献的标题词表征的研究前沿及其研究主题以非线性模式演进,其中研究主题分别为：“20世纪60—70年代：技术创新的理论功能、经济效应及其与生产率的关系等方面”、“20世纪70年代—21世纪初：技术创新与政府政策的关系等方面”、“20世纪80年代—21世纪初：技术创新合作网络与技术进步的关系等方面”、“21世纪初：技术创新合作网络与技术学习的关系等方面”、“21世纪初：技术变迁与知识的关系等方面”；从被引文献对施引文献知识流作用的引文分析视角,以及技术创新动力学中的外源因素,即科技进步、社会需要、市场竞争与政府政策等方面,阐释了50年来,国际技术创新研究前沿及其研究主题的演进机制。
基于当代国际技术创新研究前沿文献共被引聚类视角演进聚类知识图谱,计量分析得知,施引文献的作者关键词表征其研究前沿及其研究主题,其中核心研究主题为“演化和知识理论为基础的创新链”；次级研究主题分别为“创新三螺旋与核心竞争力”、“基于资源观的企业研发与创新”、“国家创新系统下的合作创新与企业成长”；边缘研究主题分别为“行为医学与人口质量”、“工程设计与工程教育”、“生态毒理学与微污染物处理技术”、“新型临床检验与诊断”与“胚胎干细胞与基因技术”；从引文分析与技术创新动力学视角,诠释了产业及企业的“研发、创新与成长”是当代国际技术创新研究前沿知识群形成的内在纽带。
基于作者共被引分析,绘制当代国际技术创新研究聚类视角演进聚类知识图谱。计量结果表明,其存在8个主流学术群体,其所关注的主流研究领域分别为“基于演化视角的国家与产业创新系统”、“企业及产业的内生技术创新”、“演化视角的产业及企业创新与其成长”、“演化视角下的产业及企业创新与知识管理的关系”、“创新与知识溢出”、“开放式创新范式下的产业及企业研发与其成长的关系”、“产品创新绩效与知识管理的关系”、“基于动态能力的产业及企业创新与组织环境的关系”；从引文分析与技术创新动力学视角,阐明了产业及企业的“成长”与“研发、创新与知识”的关系,是当代国际技术创新研究主流学术群所密切关注的核心研究领域,也是各个主流学术群体之间发生引文关系,形成聚类的核心思想。
最后,对论文的研究工作进行了总结,并且讨论了其存在的不足,提出了进一步研究的方向。
On the premise of the distributing characteric of statistic analysis of the research document of international technological innovation, the dissertation analyzes the research fronts and science community on international technological innovation based on citation analysis and cluster analysis and social networks analysis and frequency analysis of biblometrics and scientometrics with the newest information visualization technology.
The dissertation opens up the distributing characteric of the subject and time and institution and country or area of the research document of international technology innovation from 1959 to 2008 by the statistic analysis of document. The view of subject and journal indicates that the research of international technology innovation centralizes on mostly management and economics, and mostly come about from the view of economics resesarch to the view of management research in view of the development history of the research of technological innovation; the distribution of time indicates that the academe had very much given its attention to the research of technological innovation since 90 age in 20 century; the distribution of institution and country or area indicates that some countries or areas and universities are the mightiness of international technological innovation in North Amercia and Europe.
On the base of the drawing the clustering mapping knowledge domain of document co-cited of evoluting of time-zone view of the research fronts on international technological innovation, cited document with 10 years becoming time slice serve as knowledge base from 1959 to 2008, and the computation outcome displays that the research fronts and research subjects denoted by title words of corresponding citing document are evoluted with nonlinear evolution model and the research subjects separately contralizes on "60-70 times in 20 century:the relation theory function of technological innovation and economic effect and productivity, etc.", "70 times in 20 century-21 century early:the relation between technological innovation and the government policy, etc ", "80 times in 20 century-21 century early:the relation between the collaborate network of technological network and technological progress, etc", "21 century early:the relation between the collaborate network of technological network and technological learning, etc", "21 century early:the relation between technological change and knowledge, etc"; the dissertation explains the evolution mechanism of the research fronts and research subjects of international technological innovation from point of view of citation analysis of cited document acting on citing document by knowledge flow and the extrinsic factor of technological innovation dynamics, including S&T advancement and social need and market competition and government policy lately 50 years, etc.
Based on the document co-cited analysis of the clustering mapping knowledge domain of evoluting of cluster view of the research fronts on the contemporary international technological innovation, the computation analysis knows that the descriptors of citing document express the research fronts and research subjects, and the core research subjects is "the innovation chain on the base of the theory of evolutionary and knowledge", the sub research subjects are separately "innovation triple helix and core competence" and "R&D and innovation of firm resource-based" and " collaboration innovation and the growth of firms under the national innovation system ", the edge research subjects are separately "behavior medicine and population quality" and "engineering design and engineering education" and "zoology toxicology and disposal technology of micropollutants" and "new pattern clinic test and diagnosis" and "embryo germ cells and gene technology"; the dissertation annotates that the R&D and innovation and growth of industry&firm is the inherence ligament of knowledge cluster forming of the research fronts of contemporary international technological innovation from point of view of citation analysis and technological innovation dynamics.
Based on the author co-cited analysis, the dissertation draws the clustering mapping knowledge domain of evoluting of cluster view of the research on contemporary international technological innovation, the computation outcome indicates that that there are 8 major mainstream science community in the research on contemporary international technological innovation, and the mainstream research domains that it pays attention to are separately"national and industrial innovation system in view of evolution"、"endogenesis technological innovation of firm&industry"、" innovation and growth of firm&industry in view of evolution"、"the relation between innovation and knowledge management of firm&industry under the view of evolution"、" innovation and knowledge spillover"、" the relation between R&D and growth of firm&industry under the of the paradigm of open innovation"、" the relation between the performance of product innovation and knowledge management"、"the relation between innovation and organization enviroment of firm&industry in view of dynamic capability"; the dissertation illustrates that the relation the growth of industry & firm and R&D and innovation and knowledge is the core research domains that the mainstream science community of the research on contemporary international technological innovation pay closely attention to, and the core thought that every mainstream science community takes place citation connection and forms cluster from point of view of citation analysis and technological innovation dynamics.
At last, the research work of the dissertation is summed up and discussised to its shortage, and put forword more research dirctions.
引文
[1](美)彼得·F.德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].张炜译.上海：上海人民出版社,上海社会科学院出版社,2002.
[2](美)熊彼特.财富增长论——经济发展理论[M].李默译.西安：陕西师范大学出版社,2007.
[3][4]经济学动态编辑部.当代外国著名经济学家[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1984.
[5](英)鲁特彭南特—雷亚,克莱夫克鲁克.西方经济学评价[M].北京：中国对外经济贸易出版社,1990.
[6]丁冰.当代西方经济学流派[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1993.
[7]斯通曼.技术变革的经济分析[中译本][M].北京：机械工业出版社,1989.
[8]罗志如,范家骧,厉以宁等.当代西方经济学说(下)[M].北京：北京大学出版社,1989,1.
[9]OECD.技术创新统计手册[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,1993.
[10]傅家骥主编.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[11]张风,何传启.国家创新系统[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[12]李永威.民族振兴的曙光——回眸全国技术创新大会典型交流材料[J].科技与法律季刊,1999,3,1-9.
[13]李小宁,张竹均.中国技术创新活动的体制分析[J].中国科技论坛,1999,3：21-23.
[14陈晓田.技术创新十年[M].北京：科学出版社,1999.
[15]吴贵生.技术创新管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2000.
[16]王丽娜,朱欣民.技术创新基本概念与企业的选择策略研究[J].技术与市场,2005,7：36-37.
[17]倪钢,胡嵩.技术创新概念解释及其局限性[J].辽宁经济,2005,5：32-33.
[18]张磊,王淼.西方技术创新理论的产生与发展综述[J].科技与经济,2008,21(1)：56-58.
[19]刘则渊.试论中国技术哲学的东北学派[M].刘则渊,王续琨主编.工程·技术·哲学——2001年卷中国技术哲学研究年鉴.大连：大连理工大学出版社,2002.
[20]柳杰斌,刘明德.SPSS 11.0与统计模型构建[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[21]张文彤.SPSS 11.0统计分析教程[M].北京：北京希望电子出版社,2002.
[22]许振亮,刘则渊,侯海燕,葛莉.中国技术创新理论研究前沿共词知识图谱分析[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(6)：46-50.
[23]Greenhalgh T, Robert G,Macfarlane F, etal. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations:Systematic review and recommendations[J].MILBANK QUARTERLY,2004, 82(4):581-629.
[24]Toivonen, Tuominen. Emergence of innovations in services [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2009,29(7):887-902.
[25]Windrum P, Diaz C, Filiou D. Exploring the relationship between technical and service characteristics[J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS,2009,19(4):567-588.
[26]Pittaway L, Robertson M,Munir K, et al. Networking and innovation:a systematic review of the evidence[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS,2004,5-6(3-4): 137-168.
[27]Becker W, Peters J. Innovation effects of science-related technological opportunities-Theoretical considerations and empirical findings for firms in the German manufacturing industry [J]. JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK,2005,225 (2): 130-150.
[28]Heinze T. Science-based technologies, organizations, and networks-An analysis of the coupling process between science and economy[J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE,2005, 34(1):60-82.
[29]Scott A. Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development:Geography and the creative field revisited[J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS,2006,26(1):1-24.
[30]Greve HR. Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure[J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES,2005,26(7):1025-1047.
[31]Sams-Dodd F. Optimizing the discovery organization for innovation[J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY,2005,10 (15):1049-1056.
[32]Eraydin A, Armatli-Koroglu B. Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters [J] ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT,2005,17(4):237-266.
[33]Simmie J. Innovation and space:A critical review of the literature [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005,39 (6):789-804.
[34]Koo J. Technology spillovers, agglomeration, and regional economic development[J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE,2005,20 (2).:99-115.
[35]Lansisalmi H, Kivimaki M, Aalto P, Ruoranen R. Innovation in healthcare:A systematic review of recent research[J]. NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY,2006,19(1):66-72.
[36]O'Regan N, Ghobadian A, Gallear D. In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs [J]. TECHNOVATION,2006,26 (1):30-41.
[37]Chen MY, Chen AP. Knowledge management performance evaluation:a decade review from 1995 to 2004[J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,2006,32 (1):17-38.
[38]Nonaka I, Von Krogh G. Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion:Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory[J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE,2009,20(3):635-652.
[39]Johannessen JA. A systemic approach to innovation:the interactive innovation model [J]. KYBERNETES, 2009,38 (1-2):158-176.
[40]Castellacci F. Innovation and the competitiveness of industries:Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE,2008,75(7):984-1006.
[41]Johannessen JA. Organisational innovation as part of knowledge management [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,2008,28(5):403-412.
[42]Birkinshaw J. MANAGEMENT INNOVATION[J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW,2008,33(4):825-845.
[43]0'Connor GC. Major innovation as a dynamic capability:A system approach[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008,25(4):313-330.
[44]Lynn LH, Aram JD, Reddy NM. Technology communities and innovation communities[J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT,1997,14 (2):129-145.
[45]Evangel ista R, Peranl G, Rapiti F, Archibug D. Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry:some evidence fram the Ital ian innovation survey [J]. RESEARCH POLICY1997,26 (4-5):521-536.
[46]Li X, Chen HC, Dang Y, et al. A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature:1976-2004[J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH,2008,10:3-22.
[47]Diaz-Perez M, de Moya-Anegon F. Patent analysis as a strategy for innovative decisionmaking[J] PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,2008,17(3):293-302.
[48]Huang Z, Chen HC, Li X, et al. Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001-2004) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH,2006,8(6):859-879.
[49]林春艳,林晓言.技术创新理论述评[J].技术经济,2006,25(6)：4-7.
[50]牛莲芳,费良杰,庞娟.有关技术创新的文献综述[J].甘肃科技,2006,22(9)：16-18.
[51]周培栋 连漪 田巧莉.西方技术创新理论发展综述[J].商场现代化,2007,6：228-229.
[52]李兆友,金鹏.国内企业创新研究综述[J].辽宁教育行政学院学报,2006,5：140-141.
[53]刘岗,辛玉蕊.基于隐性知识的企业内部创新[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(4)：1772178.
[54]王玥,胡立昌.联盟与企业技术创新研究的综述[J].内江科技,2007,1：69-70.
[55]王成军.官产学三重螺旋创新系统模型研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(2)：315-320.
[56]焦胜利.合作技术创新理论述评[J].科技管理研究,2007,11：9-12.
[57]吴贵生,杨艳,朱恒源.中国产品创新管理研究：现状、差距与展望[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(6)：43-50.
[58]周新川,陈劲.创新研究趋势探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,5：62-66.
[59]郑刚,朱凌,陈悦.中国创新地图[J].科学学研究,2008,26(2)：443-448.
[60]岳洪江,刘思峰,梁立明.我国对技术创新的关注与研究[J].科研管理,2008,29(3)：43-52.
[61]杨德林,周亮,吴贵生.技术创新研究在中国[J].技术经济,2009,28(1)：2-9.
[62]刘则渊.国家创新体系与企业技术创新制度[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1999,20(10)：15-18.
[63]刘则渊.科学学理论体系建构的思考[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1)：1-11.
[64]孟祥羽,曾涛.国外规制与企业技术创新理论综述[J].金卡工程(经济与法),2009,1：137-138.
[65]吴伟,李兆友.国内外关于用户创新的研究综述及未来展望[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(1)：19-23.
[66]许振亮,刘则渊,陈悦.绘制国际创新管理主流学术群体的知识图谱[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,29(1)：66-71.
[67]杜广强,许振亮.国际技术创新理论前沿与热点领域主流学术群体与代表人物[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(11)：98-100.
[68]刘则渊,许振亮,庞杰.现代工程前沿图谱与中国自主创新策略[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2)：193-203.
[69]栾春娟,侯海燕.创新研究国际前沿的可视化分析[J].科技与管理,2009,11(1)：28-30.
[70]康宇航,苏敬勤.技术创新机会的可视化识别[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4)：695-701.
[71]秦长江,侯汉清.知识图谱[J].大学图书馆学报,2009,1：30-37.
[72]赵国庆,黄荣怀,陆志坚.知识可视化的理论与方法[J].开放教育研究,2005,11(1)：23-26.
[73]周宁,陈跃勇,金大卫等.知识可视化框架研究[J].情报科学,2007,25(4)：566-569.
[74]朱成全.经济学方法论[M].大连：东北财经大学出版社,2003.
[75]庞景安.科学计量研究方法论[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1999.
[76]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2004.
[77]邱均平.文献信息词频分布规律——齐普夫定律[M].情报理论与实践,23(5)：396-400.
[78]Chen CM, Morris S. Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks[R]. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington,2003:67-74.
[79]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpaceⅡ：Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2006,57(3):359-377.
[80]Price D D. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
[81]Chaomei Chen, Il-Yeol Songa, Xiaojun Yuanb, Jian Zhanga. The Thematic and Citation Landscape of Data and Knowledge Engineering (1985-2007) [J/OL].http://cluster. cis. drexel. edu/~cchen/ci tespace.
[82]侯海燕.基于知识图谱的科学计量学进展的研究[D].大连：大连理工大学,2006.
[83]邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,2007.
[84]Small H.The relationship of information science to the social science:A co-citation analysis[J]. Information Processingand Management,1980,17:39-50.
[85]Person,O. the intellectual base and research fronts of jasis 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science,1994,45(1):31-38.
[86]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpace II:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[87]Price,D.D. Networks of scientific papers[M]. Science,1965,149:510-515.
[88]Chen, C. & Morris, S. Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning tress versus pathfinder networks[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, Seattle, Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press,2003,67-74.
[89]Small, H. G.,& Griffith, B. C. The structure of scientific literatures i:Identifying and graphing specialties[J]. Science Studies,1974,4:17-40.
[90]Garfield, E. Scientography:Mapping the tracks of science [J]. Current Contents:Social & Behavioural Sciences,1994,7(45),5-10.
[91]Grafield, E. etc. The use of citation data in writing the history of science[M]. Philadephia:Institute for Scientific Information,1964.
[92]Morris, S.A. etal. Timeline visualization of research fronts[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2003,55(5):413-422.
[93]Person,0. the intellectual base and research fronts of jasis 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science,1994,45(1):31-38.
[94]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpace II:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[95]Small H. Paradigms, Citations, and Maps of Science:A Personal History [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2003:'(5):394-399.
[96]杨峰.知识域可视化研究[J].情报杂志,2007,6：82-84.
[97]马费成,张勤.国内外知识管理研究热点—基于词频的统计分析[J].情报学报,2006,(2)：163-171.
[98]魏瑞斌.基于关键词的情报学研究主题分析[J].情报科学,2006,24(9)：1400-1404.
[99]邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉大学出版社,2007.
[100]汪丁丁.知识沿时间和空间的互补性以及相关的经济学[J].经济研究,1997,6：7-78.
[101]Max H1, Bois ot. Is y our firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategieof firms [J]. Research P olicy,1995, (24):489-506.
[102]周敏,李建华.技术创新中的知识流分析.现代情报,2008,8：142-144.
[103]唐小荃.论相关学科的引文分析研究[J].图书馆研究,2005,3：86-87.
[104]何荣利.引文在论文中的分布和被引用内容的调查与分析[J].图书情报工作,2000,2：26-29.
[105]王海山.技术进步经济学[M].大连：大连理工大学出版社,1993.
[106]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[107]王大洲.知识、场域与创新[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[108]刘则渊.现代科学技术与发展导论[M].大连：大连理工大学出版社,2003.
[109]曹如中,戴昌钧.知识的经济学演化[J].图书与情报,2008,2：16-19.
[110]陈劲,王焕祥.演化经济学[M]北京：清华大学出版社,2008.
[111]魏瑞斌.基于关键词的情报学研究主题分析[J].情报科学,2006,24(9)：1400-1404.
[112]严成樑,龚六堂.熊彼特增长理论：一个文献综述[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(3)：1163-1196.
[113]哈梅尔,普拉哈拉德.竞争大未来[M].北京：昆仑出版社,1998.
[114]White HD, McCain KW. Visualizing a discipline:An author co-citation analysis of informationscience[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1998, 49:327-355.
[115]McCain KW. Mapping authors in intellectual space:a technical overview[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1990,41(6):433-443.
[116]李运景,侯汉青.引文分析可视化研究[J].情报学报,2007,26(2)：301-308.
[117]韩太祥.企业成长理论综述[J].经济学动态,2002,5：82-86.
[118]Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[119]Davenport S, Campbell-Hunt C, Solomon J. Thedynamics of technology st rategy:an exploratory study [J]. R & D Management,2003,33(5):481-499.
[120]克里斯·弗里曼,罗克·苏特.工业创新经济学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2004.
[121]姜宁,魏守华.内生创新、本土创新与自主创新辨析[J].经济经纬,2009,2:66-119.
[122]Cohen, Wesley M, Daniel. A Levinthal. Organization and learning:The two facts of R&D: Implications for the analysis of R&D investment [J] The Economic Journal.1989:569-596.
[123]林康义,刘则渊,王海山.技术开发原理与方法[M].大连：大连工学院出版社,1986.
[2](美)熊彼特.财富增长论——经济发展理论[M].李默译.西安：陕西师范大学出版社,2007.
[3][4]经济学动态编辑部.当代外国著名经济学家[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1984.
[5](英)鲁特彭南特—雷亚,克莱夫克鲁克.西方经济学评价[M].北京：中国对外经济贸易出版社,1990.
[6]丁冰.当代西方经济学流派[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1993.
[7]斯通曼.技术变革的经济分析[中译本][M].北京：机械工业出版社,1989.
[8]罗志如,范家骧,厉以宁等.当代西方经济学说(下)[M].北京：北京大学出版社,1989,1.
[9]OECD.技术创新统计手册[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,1993.
[10]傅家骥主编.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[11]张风,何传启.国家创新系统[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[12]李永威.民族振兴的曙光——回眸全国技术创新大会典型交流材料[J].科技与法律季刊,1999,3,1-9.
[13]李小宁,张竹均.中国技术创新活动的体制分析[J].中国科技论坛,1999,3：21-23.
[14陈晓田.技术创新十年[M].北京：科学出版社,1999.
[15]吴贵生.技术创新管理[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2000.
[16]王丽娜,朱欣民.技术创新基本概念与企业的选择策略研究[J].技术与市场,2005,7：36-37.
[17]倪钢,胡嵩.技术创新概念解释及其局限性[J].辽宁经济,2005,5：32-33.
[18]张磊,王淼.西方技术创新理论的产生与发展综述[J].科技与经济,2008,21(1)：56-58.
[19]刘则渊.试论中国技术哲学的东北学派[M].刘则渊,王续琨主编.工程·技术·哲学——2001年卷中国技术哲学研究年鉴.大连：大连理工大学出版社,2002.
[20]柳杰斌,刘明德.SPSS 11.0与统计模型构建[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[21]张文彤.SPSS 11.0统计分析教程[M].北京：北京希望电子出版社,2002.
[22]许振亮,刘则渊,侯海燕,葛莉.中国技术创新理论研究前沿共词知识图谱分析[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(6)：46-50.
[23]Greenhalgh T, Robert G,Macfarlane F, etal. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations:Systematic review and recommendations[J].MILBANK QUARTERLY,2004, 82(4):581-629.
[24]Toivonen, Tuominen. Emergence of innovations in services [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2009,29(7):887-902.
[25]Windrum P, Diaz C, Filiou D. Exploring the relationship between technical and service characteristics[J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS,2009,19(4):567-588.
[26]Pittaway L, Robertson M,Munir K, et al. Networking and innovation:a systematic review of the evidence[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS,2004,5-6(3-4): 137-168.
[27]Becker W, Peters J. Innovation effects of science-related technological opportunities-Theoretical considerations and empirical findings for firms in the German manufacturing industry [J]. JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK,2005,225 (2): 130-150.
[28]Heinze T. Science-based technologies, organizations, and networks-An analysis of the coupling process between science and economy[J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE,2005, 34(1):60-82.
[29]Scott A. Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development:Geography and the creative field revisited[J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS,2006,26(1):1-24.
[30]Greve HR. Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure[J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES,2005,26(7):1025-1047.
[31]Sams-Dodd F. Optimizing the discovery organization for innovation[J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY,2005,10 (15):1049-1056.
[32]Eraydin A, Armatli-Koroglu B. Innovation, networking and the new industrial clusters: the characteristics of networks and local innovation capabilities in the Turkish industrial clusters [J] ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT,2005,17(4):237-266.
[33]Simmie J. Innovation and space:A critical review of the literature [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005,39 (6):789-804.
[34]Koo J. Technology spillovers, agglomeration, and regional economic development[J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE,2005,20 (2).:99-115.
[35]Lansisalmi H, Kivimaki M, Aalto P, Ruoranen R. Innovation in healthcare:A systematic review of recent research[J]. NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY,2006,19(1):66-72.
[36]O'Regan N, Ghobadian A, Gallear D. In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs [J]. TECHNOVATION,2006,26 (1):30-41.
[37]Chen MY, Chen AP. Knowledge management performance evaluation:a decade review from 1995 to 2004[J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE,2006,32 (1):17-38.
[38]Nonaka I, Von Krogh G. Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion:Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory[J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE,2009,20(3):635-652.
[39]Johannessen JA. A systemic approach to innovation:the interactive innovation model [J]. KYBERNETES, 2009,38 (1-2):158-176.
[40]Castellacci F. Innovation and the competitiveness of industries:Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE,2008,75(7):984-1006.
[41]Johannessen JA. Organisational innovation as part of knowledge management [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT,2008,28(5):403-412.
[42]Birkinshaw J. MANAGEMENT INNOVATION[J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW,2008,33(4):825-845.
[43]0'Connor GC. Major innovation as a dynamic capability:A system approach[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008,25(4):313-330.
[44]Lynn LH, Aram JD, Reddy NM. Technology communities and innovation communities[J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT,1997,14 (2):129-145.
[45]Evangel ista R, Peranl G, Rapiti F, Archibug D. Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry:some evidence fram the Ital ian innovation survey [J]. RESEARCH POLICY1997,26 (4-5):521-536.
[46]Li X, Chen HC, Dang Y, et al. A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature:1976-2004[J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH,2008,10:3-22.
[47]Diaz-Perez M, de Moya-Anegon F. Patent analysis as a strategy for innovative decisionmaking[J] PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION,2008,17(3):293-302.
[48]Huang Z, Chen HC, Li X, et al. Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001-2004) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH,2006,8(6):859-879.
[49]林春艳,林晓言.技术创新理论述评[J].技术经济,2006,25(6)：4-7.
[50]牛莲芳,费良杰,庞娟.有关技术创新的文献综述[J].甘肃科技,2006,22(9)：16-18.
[51]周培栋 连漪 田巧莉.西方技术创新理论发展综述[J].商场现代化,2007,6：228-229.
[52]李兆友,金鹏.国内企业创新研究综述[J].辽宁教育行政学院学报,2006,5：140-141.
[53]刘岗,辛玉蕊.基于隐性知识的企业内部创新[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(4)：1772178.
[54]王玥,胡立昌.联盟与企业技术创新研究的综述[J].内江科技,2007,1：69-70.
[55]王成军.官产学三重螺旋创新系统模型研究[J].科学学研究,2006,24(2)：315-320.
[56]焦胜利.合作技术创新理论述评[J].科技管理研究,2007,11：9-12.
[57]吴贵生,杨艳,朱恒源.中国产品创新管理研究：现状、差距与展望[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(6)：43-50.
[58]周新川,陈劲.创新研究趋势探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,5：62-66.
[59]郑刚,朱凌,陈悦.中国创新地图[J].科学学研究,2008,26(2)：443-448.
[60]岳洪江,刘思峰,梁立明.我国对技术创新的关注与研究[J].科研管理,2008,29(3)：43-52.
[61]杨德林,周亮,吴贵生.技术创新研究在中国[J].技术经济,2009,28(1)：2-9.
[62]刘则渊.国家创新体系与企业技术创新制度[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1999,20(10)：15-18.
[63]刘则渊.科学学理论体系建构的思考[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1)：1-11.
[64]孟祥羽,曾涛.国外规制与企业技术创新理论综述[J].金卡工程(经济与法),2009,1：137-138.
[65]吴伟,李兆友.国内外关于用户创新的研究综述及未来展望[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(1)：19-23.
[66]许振亮,刘则渊,陈悦.绘制国际创新管理主流学术群体的知识图谱[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,29(1)：66-71.
[67]杜广强,许振亮.国际技术创新理论前沿与热点领域主流学术群体与代表人物[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(11)：98-100.
[68]刘则渊,许振亮,庞杰.现代工程前沿图谱与中国自主创新策略[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2)：193-203.
[69]栾春娟,侯海燕.创新研究国际前沿的可视化分析[J].科技与管理,2009,11(1)：28-30.
[70]康宇航,苏敬勤.技术创新机会的可视化识别[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4)：695-701.
[71]秦长江,侯汉清.知识图谱[J].大学图书馆学报,2009,1：30-37.
[72]赵国庆,黄荣怀,陆志坚.知识可视化的理论与方法[J].开放教育研究,2005,11(1)：23-26.
[73]周宁,陈跃勇,金大卫等.知识可视化框架研究[J].情报科学,2007,25(4)：566-569.
[74]朱成全.经济学方法论[M].大连：东北财经大学出版社,2003.
[75]庞景安.科学计量研究方法论[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1999.
[76]马庆国.管理统计[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2004.
[77]邱均平.文献信息词频分布规律——齐普夫定律[M].情报理论与实践,23(5)：396-400.
[78]Chen CM, Morris S. Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks[R]. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington,2003:67-74.
[79]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpaceⅡ：Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2006,57(3):359-377.
[80]Price D D. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
[81]Chaomei Chen, Il-Yeol Songa, Xiaojun Yuanb, Jian Zhanga. The Thematic and Citation Landscape of Data and Knowledge Engineering (1985-2007) [J/OL].http://cluster. cis. drexel. edu/~cchen/ci tespace.
[82]侯海燕.基于知识图谱的科学计量学进展的研究[D].大连：大连理工大学,2006.
[83]邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,2007.
[84]Small H.The relationship of information science to the social science:A co-citation analysis[J]. Information Processingand Management,1980,17:39-50.
[85]Person,O. the intellectual base and research fronts of jasis 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science,1994,45(1):31-38.
[86]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpace II:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[87]Price,D.D. Networks of scientific papers[M]. Science,1965,149:510-515.
[88]Chen, C. & Morris, S. Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning tress versus pathfinder networks[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, Seattle, Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press,2003,67-74.
[89]Small, H. G.,& Griffith, B. C. The structure of scientific literatures i:Identifying and graphing specialties[J]. Science Studies,1974,4:17-40.
[90]Garfield, E. Scientography:Mapping the tracks of science [J]. Current Contents:Social & Behavioural Sciences,1994,7(45),5-10.
[91]Grafield, E. etc. The use of citation data in writing the history of science[M]. Philadephia:Institute for Scientific Information,1964.
[92]Morris, S.A. etal. Timeline visualization of research fronts[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2003,55(5):413-422.
[93]Person,0. the intellectual base and research fronts of jasis 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science,1994,45(1):31-38.
[94]Chaomei Chen. CiteSpace II:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[95]Small H. Paradigms, Citations, and Maps of Science:A Personal History [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2003:'(5):394-399.
[96]杨峰.知识域可视化研究[J].情报杂志,2007,6：82-84.
[97]马费成,张勤.国内外知识管理研究热点—基于词频的统计分析[J].情报学报,2006,(2)：163-171.
[98]魏瑞斌.基于关键词的情报学研究主题分析[J].情报科学,2006,24(9)：1400-1404.
[99]邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉大学出版社,2007.
[100]汪丁丁.知识沿时间和空间的互补性以及相关的经济学[J].经济研究,1997,6：7-78.
[101]Max H1, Bois ot. Is y our firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategieof firms [J]. Research P olicy,1995, (24):489-506.
[102]周敏,李建华.技术创新中的知识流分析.现代情报,2008,8：142-144.
[103]唐小荃.论相关学科的引文分析研究[J].图书馆研究,2005,3：86-87.
[104]何荣利.引文在论文中的分布和被引用内容的调查与分析[J].图书情报工作,2000,2：26-29.
[105]王海山.技术进步经济学[M].大连：大连理工大学出版社,1993.
[106]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[107]王大洲.知识、场域与创新[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[108]刘则渊.现代科学技术与发展导论[M].大连：大连理工大学出版社,2003.
[109]曹如中,戴昌钧.知识的经济学演化[J].图书与情报,2008,2：16-19.
[110]陈劲,王焕祥.演化经济学[M]北京：清华大学出版社,2008.
[111]魏瑞斌.基于关键词的情报学研究主题分析[J].情报科学,2006,24(9)：1400-1404.
[112]严成樑,龚六堂.熊彼特增长理论：一个文献综述[J].经济学(季刊),2009,8(3)：1163-1196.
[113]哈梅尔,普拉哈拉德.竞争大未来[M].北京：昆仑出版社,1998.
[114]White HD, McCain KW. Visualizing a discipline:An author co-citation analysis of informationscience[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1998, 49:327-355.
[115]McCain KW. Mapping authors in intellectual space:a technical overview[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1990,41(6):433-443.
[116]李运景,侯汉青.引文分析可视化研究[J].情报学报,2007,26(2)：301-308.
[117]韩太祥.企业成长理论综述[J].经济学动态,2002,5：82-86.
[118]Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[119]Davenport S, Campbell-Hunt C, Solomon J. Thedynamics of technology st rategy:an exploratory study [J]. R & D Management,2003,33(5):481-499.
[120]克里斯·弗里曼,罗克·苏特.工业创新经济学[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2004.
[121]姜宁,魏守华.内生创新、本土创新与自主创新辨析[J].经济经纬,2009,2:66-119.
[122]Cohen, Wesley M, Daniel. A Levinthal. Organization and learning:The two facts of R&D: Implications for the analysis of R&D investment [J] The Economic Journal.1989:569-596.
[123]林康义,刘则渊,王海山.技术开发原理与方法[M].大连：大连工学院出版社,1986.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |