台北市城市设计审议制度与审议内容之研究
|
摘要
台北市城市设计审议制度早期的主要功能是弥补建筑管理法令的缺乏弹性与不足,但近年来则逐步演变成引领公私部门戮力提升城市开发品质的一种制度。在商业挂帅的今天,开发建商极有可能为了私利而破坏整体环境景,唯有透过审议制度的严格控管,才有可能让破坏环境生态的事减至最低。
本研究从台北市城市设计的价值观出发,着眼于台北市城市设计审议制度与审议内容的探讨,希望了解此一机制在引领城市建设发展的同时,是否也能发挥监控环境品质的功能,让城市发展与提升城市品质齐头并进。
本研究针对笔者参与台北市城市设计审议委员会6年时间,审议600件以上城市设计项目,审议的对象可能是住宅、办公大楼、百货商场、学校、医院、公园、古迹…等不同类别;而每个类别因属性不同,功能性迥异,审议的重点亦有所不同,本研究汇整分析后,分门别类整理出其审议内容的重点。
另外再从600件城市设计项目中,分析归纳出其审议内容包含:1.视觉景观美学2.文化历史保存3.环境品质改善4.以人为本5.节约能源及绿建筑6.公共安全7.公共交通8.公共艺术9形塑城市独特风貌等,九大价值观,并依其特色加以阐述说明。
本研究除了选取笔者参与审议之较具代表性之城市设计审议项目,论证九大价值观之外;也将九大价值观在笔者个人执业的建筑师事务所执行的设计业务上进行实务操作,藉以探讨城市设计审议制度及审议内容的理论与开发实务之间的差异性。
他山之石可以攻错,两岸城市设计经验其实可以互相交流、截长补短,本研究汇整台湾城市设计发展的负面案例作为借镜,希望国内发展避免重蹈覆辙。
本研究主要成果包括:
一、检讨台北市城市设计审议制度的优缺点及拟定未来改进方向。
二、从600件项目中分门别类整理出不同的审议内容重点以供参考。
三、整理分析研究台湾城市设计发展的负面案例。
四、研究分析归纳出九大价值观,并举出实例及笔者实际操作之项目加以论述。
Urban Design is an integral conception and arrangement for the formation of cities and spatial environment, as well as the whole process which penetrates the urban planning. Thru the communication and coordination during the process, the deliberation of urban design expects that the development projects while focusing on the business profit could consider the enhancement of the whole environmental quality of open space, public activities and urban landscape.
In the early phase, Taipei's Urban Design Review mainly operated to compensate for the absence of flexibility and insufficiency in the regulations of building management. In recent period, it turns to lead the encouragement of cooperative urban development between government and private sectors. Today, business profit is the top priority for developers. They are very likely to devastate the whole environmental landscape due to their self-interest. The Urban Design Review is the only way to diminish the damage of environmental ecology to the minimum extent thru the strict supervision.
Launching from the viewpoint of the values for Taipei's urban development, this research focuses on the exploration of Taipei's Urban Design Review and its contents. It is assessed whether the mechanism can elaborate the function on supervising the environmental quality and assure that the urban development advances side by side with the promotion of urban living quality.
Due to the objects of the Urban Design Review contain residences, office buildings, business complex, schools, hospitals, parks, historical spots, etc.,…, each category has its distinctive usage and functions. Therefore, the emphasis on the Urban Design Review for each category has differences because of case attribute. This research sorts out the main issues concerned in each category. Moreover, this research breakdowns the spotlight of the Urban Design Review into nine value constructs, which are: 1. aesthetics of visual landscape, 2.presevation of culture and history, 3.improvement in environmental quality, 4.humanity as base, 5. energy conservation and green architecture, 6.public safety, 7.public transportation, 8. public arts, 9.unique formation of urban. The feature for each construct is described in details.
The results of this research include:
1. the assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the deliberation and the future directions for improvement;
2. the proposition for the key points of the Urban Design Review in each category based on case attribute from 600 examples as the reference for the future review of urban design
3. the analysis of bad examples of urban design in Taipei.
4. the development of nine value constructs for the contents in the Urban Design Review as well as the discussion with examples.
本研究从台北市城市设计的价值观出发,着眼于台北市城市设计审议制度与审议内容的探讨,希望了解此一机制在引领城市建设发展的同时,是否也能发挥监控环境品质的功能,让城市发展与提升城市品质齐头并进。
本研究针对笔者参与台北市城市设计审议委员会6年时间,审议600件以上城市设计项目,审议的对象可能是住宅、办公大楼、百货商场、学校、医院、公园、古迹…等不同类别;而每个类别因属性不同,功能性迥异,审议的重点亦有所不同,本研究汇整分析后,分门别类整理出其审议内容的重点。
另外再从600件城市设计项目中,分析归纳出其审议内容包含:1.视觉景观美学2.文化历史保存3.环境品质改善4.以人为本5.节约能源及绿建筑6.公共安全7.公共交通8.公共艺术9形塑城市独特风貌等,九大价值观,并依其特色加以阐述说明。
本研究除了选取笔者参与审议之较具代表性之城市设计审议项目,论证九大价值观之外;也将九大价值观在笔者个人执业的建筑师事务所执行的设计业务上进行实务操作,藉以探讨城市设计审议制度及审议内容的理论与开发实务之间的差异性。
他山之石可以攻错,两岸城市设计经验其实可以互相交流、截长补短,本研究汇整台湾城市设计发展的负面案例作为借镜,希望国内发展避免重蹈覆辙。
本研究主要成果包括:
一、检讨台北市城市设计审议制度的优缺点及拟定未来改进方向。
二、从600件项目中分门别类整理出不同的审议内容重点以供参考。
三、整理分析研究台湾城市设计发展的负面案例。
四、研究分析归纳出九大价值观,并举出实例及笔者实际操作之项目加以论述。
Urban Design is an integral conception and arrangement for the formation of cities and spatial environment, as well as the whole process which penetrates the urban planning. Thru the communication and coordination during the process, the deliberation of urban design expects that the development projects while focusing on the business profit could consider the enhancement of the whole environmental quality of open space, public activities and urban landscape.
In the early phase, Taipei's Urban Design Review mainly operated to compensate for the absence of flexibility and insufficiency in the regulations of building management. In recent period, it turns to lead the encouragement of cooperative urban development between government and private sectors. Today, business profit is the top priority for developers. They are very likely to devastate the whole environmental landscape due to their self-interest. The Urban Design Review is the only way to diminish the damage of environmental ecology to the minimum extent thru the strict supervision.
Launching from the viewpoint of the values for Taipei's urban development, this research focuses on the exploration of Taipei's Urban Design Review and its contents. It is assessed whether the mechanism can elaborate the function on supervising the environmental quality and assure that the urban development advances side by side with the promotion of urban living quality.
Due to the objects of the Urban Design Review contain residences, office buildings, business complex, schools, hospitals, parks, historical spots, etc.,…, each category has its distinctive usage and functions. Therefore, the emphasis on the Urban Design Review for each category has differences because of case attribute. This research sorts out the main issues concerned in each category. Moreover, this research breakdowns the spotlight of the Urban Design Review into nine value constructs, which are: 1. aesthetics of visual landscape, 2.presevation of culture and history, 3.improvement in environmental quality, 4.humanity as base, 5. energy conservation and green architecture, 6.public safety, 7.public transportation, 8. public arts, 9.unique formation of urban. The feature for each construct is described in details.
The results of this research include:
1. the assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the deliberation and the future directions for improvement;
2. the proposition for the key points of the Urban Design Review in each category based on case attribute from 600 examples as the reference for the future review of urban design
3. the analysis of bad examples of urban design in Taipei.
4. the development of nine value constructs for the contents in the Urban Design Review as well as the discussion with examples.
引文
铩? 殷成志.杨东峰,城市问题,2007年第4期.
铩? 营建杂志社编印.住宅专业用语汇编.台北,1994,P.93
2 齐康.城市建筑.江苏:东南大学出版社,2001,PP.6-7
3 吴志强.2010中法建筑与城市发展论坛:上海世博会规划与城市和谐发展.上海:理想空间出版,2005,P.111
4 马文军.城市规划方法论.北京:城市规划,2005年11月P.29
5 阮仪三.城市建设与规划基础理论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1992,p.46
6 21世纪城市住区.Urban housing for the 21st century.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001,P.48
铩? 中国城市规划学会主编.中国当代城市设计精品集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000,P.6
8 陳婉钰,施植明,陳林蔚.都市設针容積管制之變更舆執行——以台北國際金融中心爲例.台北:中華民國建築學會第十八届第一次建築研究成果發表畲論文集,2006
9 城市在台湾称「都市」,本论文以城市进行论述,但若属专有名词仍以都市称之,如:台湾的「都市计画法」、「台北市政府都市发展局」。
铩?0 黄瑞茂,1993,建筑师杂志226期,p66-74。
铩?1 林钦荣.都市设计在台湾.台北:创新出版社,1995。
铩? 石铁矛.居住建筑快速设计图集.审阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1995,P.253
铩? 张松周瑾.论近现代建筑遗产保护的制度建设.见:建筑学报.北京:中国建筑学会出版,2005,p.7。
铩? 台北市政府都市发展局编印,.台北生态都市设计架构暨原则之研定,2003,P.1
铩? 陈淳,周浩明.传统街区建成环境意义的再思考——以使用者为认识主体的研究方法的提出.见:建筑师.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005第117期:p.5
5 阳明山国家公园位于台北市内。
铩? 沉清基.中国城市能源可持续发展研究:一种城市规划的视角.上海:城市规划学刊,2005年第160期P.41
铩? 江哲铭.共生「乐」、健康「活」.台北:第三届台北建筑论坛——共筑生命空间,2006,P.75
铩? 阮如舫.打开城市百宝盒.天津:百花文艺出版社,2004,p48
铩?1 周俭.城市住宅区规划原理.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,P.184
铩? 徐佳楢.都市天際線建耩之研究—台南市都市天際線建耩準則之研擬.台南:成功大学建筑學系,2000
铩颷1]李志刚,魏立华.西方城市规划理论及相关期刊述评.见:规划师.广西:规划师杂志社, 2005第120期:p.29
[2]营建杂志社编印.住宅专业用语汇编.台北,1994,P.93
[3]齐康.城市建筑.江苏:东南大学出版社,2001,PP.6-7
[4]吴志强.2010中法建筑与城市发展论坛:上海世博会规划与城市和谐发展.上海:理想 空间出版。2005,P.111
[5]马文军.城市规划方法论.北京:城市规划,2005年11月P.29
[6]阮仪三.城市建设与规划基础理论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1992,P.46
[7]21世纪城市住区.Urban housing for the 21st century.北京:中国建筑工业出版 社,2001,P.48
[8]中国城市规划学会主编.中国当代城市设计精品集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000, P.6
[9]陈婉钰,施植明,陈林蔚.都市设计容积管制之变更与执行-以台北国际金融中心为 例.台北:中华民国建筑学会第十八届第一次建筑研究成果发表会论文集,2006
[10]余美凤,法令与裁量互动对都市发展之影响-以财产权观点探讨都市设计制度在台湾 之发展.台北:2000年中华民国住宅学会第九届年会论文集
[11]石铁矛.居住建筑快速设计图集.审阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1995,P.253
[12]台北市政府都市发展局编印,.台北生态都市设计架构暨原则之研定,2003,P.1
[13]陈淳,周浩明.传统街区建成环境意义的再思考——以使用者为认识主体的研究方法 的提出.见:建筑师.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005第117期:p.5
[14]沉清基.中国城市能源可持续发展研究:一种城市规划的视角.上海:城市规划学刊, 2005年第160期P.41
[15]江哲铭.共生[乐]、健康[活].台北:第三届台北建筑论坛——共筑生命空间,2006, P.75
[16]陈秉钊.保护与再生中的情理观.上海:同济大学
[17]周俭.城市住宅区规划原理.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,P.184
[18]张松周瑾.论近现代建筑遗产保护的制度建设.见:建筑学报.北京:中国建筑学会出 版,2005,p.7.
[19]林钦荣.都市设计在台湾.台北:创新出版社,1995
[20]陈明竺.都市设计.台北:创新出版社,1992
[21]Kevin Lynch.The openness of open space,City sense and city design,1972
[22]Lynch.The Image of the City,1961
[23]Lynch and Hack.Site Planning 3rd edition.1984
铩颷24]Lynch.Good City Form,1988
[25]吴纲立.从西方近代城市设计思潮的发展看台湾城市设计专业的定位.见:关华山主 编.建筑学报.台北:中华民国建筑学会出版,2006
[26]Castells,Manual.,The City and the Grassroots.Berkeley and Los Angeles. California University of California Press,1983
[27]郭琼莹.都市开放空间与都市美学.台北:艺术家出版社,1993
[28]Gosling,David.＆Barry Maitland.Concepts of Urban Design.London: Acndon:Academy,1985
[29]Lynch Kevin.City Design:What It is and How It Might be Taught.Purchase. New York:The Institute for Urban Design,1982
[30]Barnett,Jonathan.Urban Design as Public Policy.New York:McGraw-Hill,1974
[31]2003 International Conference on Planning and Design:sustainable environment and development,2003
[32]蔡定芳,林钦荣,夏铸九.城市设计研究班第一期讲义汇编.台北:台北市建筑师公会 印赠,1992
[33]R.B.Singh.Urban sustainability in the context of global change:towards promoting healthy and green cities,2001
[34]Mario Polese＆Richard Stren.The social sustainability of cities:diversity and the management of change,2000
[35]A.F.Foo＆Belinda Yuen.Sustainable cities in the 21st century,1999
[36]Philip Allmendinger＆Michael Chapman,Planning beyond 2000,1999
[37]林钦荣.都市的经营理念-都市公共空间环境品质的观察与省思.见:林志崧,黄健敏 主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,1992
[38]刘宪宗.都市公共开放空间系统的建构-丹佛的实例.台北的借镜.台北:造园季刊, 1992
[39]董圆圆.都市设计管制对开放空间之开放性的形塑作用研究:[硕士学位论文].台北: 淡江大学建筑学系,2004
[40]黄昆山.自开发管制理念探讨台湾城市设计之定位与功能.见:城市与计划,2006
[41]吴佩瑛,施伯宜.台湾县市生活品质水准之比较.见:台湾经济,1996第240 期:pp.26-38
[42]王振寰,黄书纬.从社会主义城市到世界城市:上海城市调节模式的转型.台北:台 湾社会学刊,2001
[43]李少甫.理想城市与紧凑城市:界线空间概念之评述.台北:建筑与规划学报,2002/10
[44]中、日、韩之城市指标汇编.中日韩城市计划学会国际学术交流研讨会.台北:中华 民国城市计划学会
[45]台北市政府城市发展局.修订综合发展计划-永续发展城市之发展目标及策略之研拟 -国外城市发展评析.台北:中华民国城市计划学会
[46]张庭传.城市高速发展中的城市设计问题:关于城市设计原则的讨论.上海:城市规 划汇刊,2001年第3期:5-11
铩颷47]陈景润.组合数学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1985
[48]丁荣生.台北市城市设计城市审议制度运作十多年有感-访文化大学市政系陈明竺主 任.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,1993/11:58-59
[49]王价巨.台北市城市设计审议经验之研究:[硕士学位论文].台北:台湾大学建筑与城 乡研究所,1998
[50]台北市建筑师公会.台北市城市设计审议制度信息化作业.台北:台北市城市发展 局,2003
[51]邱茂林.城市景观计算机视觉仿真程序与技术之研究.台北:内政部建筑研究所专题 研究计划成果报告,1999
[52]黄昆山.台湾城市实施城市设计工作之可行性研究.台北:国科会专题研究计划(NSC82-0301-H006-030T),1993
[53]现代都市街道景观设计.Elements＆total concepts of urban pavement design eng. 台北:新形象出版公司编辑部,1993
[54]David Banister.Transport policy and the environment,1998
[55]J.Breuste,H.Feldmann＆O.Uhlmann(eds.)Urban ecology:1998
[56]Peter Hall＆Colin Ward,Sociable cities:the legacy of Ebenezer Howard, 1998
[57]Belinda Yuen,Planning Singapore:from plan to implementation,1998
[58]Michael E.Bonine,Population,poverty,and politics in Middle East cities, 1997
[59]乔纳森.巴奈特(Barnett,Jonathan)谢庆达,庄建德译.都市设计概论.台北:创新 出版社,1993
[60]蒋晓梅.都市化冲击下营造适居性都市环境之有效途径.多向度市镇规划设计理念及 其空间架构之研究An effect:An effective way of the building livable urban environment under the impact of urbanization a research of the design concept and the space-structure of planning a multi-dimensional town,1993
[61]Chakrabary,B.K.Urban Management-Concepts,Principle.Techniques and Education,Cities,2001,Vol 18(5):331-345
[62]Ducan,J.S.and Ducan,N.,Rercording the Landscape,Environment and Planning D:Society and space,1988 Vol(6):117-126
[63]Hubbard,P.,Urban design and Local Economic Development,Cities,1995Vol 12(4): 243-251
[64]Punter,J.V.,().Post-modernism,Planning Practice and Research,1998 Vol(4):22-28
[65]Christopher Alexander等原著.黄瑞茂译.新的都市设计理论,1994
[66]韦恩·奥图(wayne Attoe),唐·洛干(Donn Logan)作,王劭方译.美国都市建筑城 市设计的触媒:美国都市建筑城市设计的触媒
[67]朱文一.空间、符号、城市 一种城市设计理论.Space·Symbol·city a theory of urban design
铩颷68]Cechini,A.,New information＆communication technologies and the professions of town and regional planners.Computers,Environment and Urban System,1999, pp.151-172
[69]Roger Trancik着,谢庆达译.都市设计理论:找寻失落的空间,1996
[70]Jacob,Allen B.,Education for Successful Practice,Education for Urban Design 1982,[27]Purchase,New York:The Institute for Urban Design, pp.118-121.
[71]King,R.J.,Urban Design In Capitalist Society,1988
[72]Appleyard,Donald,et al.,1982b,”Three Kinds of Urban Design Practice”, 《Education for Urban Design》,New York:The Institute for Urban Design, pp.122-126.
[73]王建国.现代都市设计理论和方法Modern urban design theory and method
[74]Marcus and Francis.People Places:Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, 2002
[75]Macdonald and Larice.Urban Design Reader,2007
[76]卢芬芬.实施都市设计地区都市开放空间原则性规范之研究:以高雄市为例A study of open space guideline in urban design area as an example of Kaoshing city
[77]Ranzinger,M.,＆Gunther Gleixner,GIS datasets for 3D urban planning, Computers,Environment and Urban System.1997 Vol.21(2):159-173
[78]Seder,I.,R.Weinkauf,＆T.Neumann,Knowledge-based databases and intelligent decision support for environmental management in urban systems,2000
[79]Jonathan Barnett,1974:舒达恩,1983
[80]McHarg.Design with Nature,1969
[81]Mitchell.E-topia,2001
[82]Gruber,Michael＆Erich Wilmersdorf,Urban data management-A modern approach, Computers,Environment and Urban System,1997 Vol.21(2):147-158
[83]Levinson,Paul.Digital Mcluhan-A guide to the information millennium. New York,Routledge,Taylor＆Francis Group press,2001
[84]王价巨.台北市都市设计审议经验之研究A study on the urban design review experience of Taipei 1997
[85]六合出版社编译.都市景观设计:元素及总体概念.台北:六合出版社编译,1991
[86]王旭斌.类型管制之都市设计方法:以台北市内湖二期重划区为例Type Control as a language of urban design,2001
[87]专题研习报告:2002新加坡及马来西亚都市设计与景观规划The seminar of urban design and landscape planning台北:行政院人事行政局地方行政研习中心出 版,2003
[88]Lin and Male.Urban Sociology Reader,2004
[89]Stein.Classic Readings in Urban Planning 2nd edition,2004
[90]Spirn.The Granite Garden:Urban Nature and Human Design,1985
铩颷91]Lo and Yeung.Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia,1996
[92]Savage,Ward,and Ward.Urban Sociology,Capitalism and Modernity:Second Edition,2003
[93]Wooley.Sumerians,1928
[94]Sinel.The Metropolis and Mental Life,1903
[95]Watson and Bridge.The Blackwell City Reader,2003
[96]Laquian.Beyond Metropolis:The Planning and Governance of Asia's Mega-Urban Regions,2005
[97]Sitte.The Art of Building Cities:City Building According to its Artistic Fundamentals,1889
[98]Scott.American City Planning Since 1890,1985
[99]Sennett.Class ic Essays On The Culture Of Cities,1969
[100]Wheeler,et al.Planning Sustainable and Livable Cities,2006
[101]Wirth.Urbanism as a Way of Life,1938
[102]陈荆洲.实施都市设计地区景观计划之研究:以新市区建设地区为例A study of landscape planning in urban design as an example of new urban development area撰,2003
[103]Mellart.catal Huyuk:a Neolithic Town in Anatolia,1967
[104]Macionis and Parillo.Cities and Urban Life 4th Edition,2006
[105]Reps.The Making Of Urban America:A History of City Planning In The United States,1965
[106]Routledge.The Cybercities Reader,2003
[107]Peter Morris.Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment,2001
[108]赖美如.以放射状铁道网向都心集中的空间结构-东京都市构造与交通问题.见:林 志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[109]郑弘佩.大生活圈的局促住居-东京都会区的居住现状及课题.见:林志崧,黄健敏 主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[110]Jacob,Allen B.,Education for Urban Design,1982
[111]Mollenkopf.The Postwar Politics Of Urban Development,1975
[112]Mollenkopf.A Phoenix in the Ashes:The Rise and Fall of the Koch Coalition in New York City Politics,1992
[113]Mollenkopf and Strom.The Urban Politics Reader,2006
[114]蔡学义,张立立.参加一九九五年中日韩都市计划学会国际学术交流暨调查汉城国际 化都市发展.台北市政府所属各机关因供出国人员出国报告
[115]E.Howard.Tomorrow:A Peaceful Path to Real Reform,1898
[116]F.Wright.Broadacre City,1935
[117]Andreas Faludi.A Reader in Planning Theory,1973
[118]Allmendinger.Planning Theory,2002
[119]赵翔.走向健康建筑-变迁中的医院建筑.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师 杂志
铩颷120]堀边宪二.以舒适空间为芯的都会建设:东京的经验.空间杂志第64期
[121]Le Corbusier.The City of Tomorrow and its Planning,1929
[122]Campbell and Fainstein.Readings in Planning Theory 2nd revised edition,2003
[123]Krumholz and Forester.Making Equity Planning Work:Leadership in the Public Sector,1990
[124]许盛美,许盛莉译.阿姆斯特丹与荷兰中部
[125]施鸿志.地区竞争力指标体系建构之研究.台北:国科会专题研究(NS C89-2415-H-006-014)
[126]Taylor.Urban Planning Theory Since 1945,1998
[127]Taylor.Anglo-American Town Planning Theory Since 1945:Three Significant Developments But No Paradigm Shifts,1999
[128]Bassett.The Master Plan,With A Discussion of the Theory of Community Land Planning Legislation,1938
[129]李威仪.东京都会2000-东京都会环境今与昔.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建 筑师杂志
[130]李威仪.京都会圈的变迁与发展.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[131]Garvin et al.Urban Parks and Open Space,1997
[132]Garvin.The American City:What Works,What Doesn't,2002
[133]Kent.The Urban General Plan,1964
[134]行政院国家科学委员会专题研究计划成果报告.都市空间发展与国家体制-上海与 台北之比较.台北:台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所
[135]Susan Fainstein.New Directions in Planning Theory,2000
[136]Rodwin＆Sanyal.The Profession of City Planning:Changes,Images and Challenges:1950-2000.2000
[137]Mazza,Mandelbaum,and Burchell.Explorations in Planning Theory,1996
[138]王惠君.东京的历史环境保存.见:空间杂志第93期
[139]王惠君.浮世绘、不思议之都-从江户到东京-东京都会的形成.见:林志崧,黄健 敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[140]Boyer.Dreaming the Rational City:The Myth of American City Planning,1986
[141]Clarke.The European City and Green Space:London,Stockholm,Helsinki And St.Petersburg,1850-2000,2000
[142]Calthorpe and Fulton.The Regional City,2001
[143]Barther.City People:The Rise of Modern City Culture in the 19th Century America,1982
[144]Burnham.Plan for Chicago,1909(2006版)
[145]Hohenberg and Lees.The Making of Urban Europe 1000-1950,1985
[146]Hack.Planning Metropolitan Regions,2001
铩颷147]J.Barnett.Redesigning Cities:Principles,Practice and Implementation, 2003
[148]Krueckeberg.The American Planner 2nd edition,1994
[149]Kaiser,Godschalk,and Berke.Urban Land Use Planning,5th Edition,2006
[150]Lang.Urban Design:The American Experience,1994
[151]LeGates and Stout.The City Reader 4th edition,2007
[152]Larry Cantor.Environmental Impact Assessment,1995
[153]Jacobs.The Death and Life of Great American Cities,1961
[154]Judd and Kantor.American Urban Politics:The Reader,4th edition,2005
[155]J.Jacob.The Economy of Cities,1970
[156]台北市政府都市发展局.巴黎-台北都市发展研讨会,巴黎都市发展报告.
[157]中华民国都市计划学会.修订综合发展计划-永续发展城市之发展目标及策略之研 拟-国外城市发展评析.台北市政府都市发展局
[158]李少甫.理想城市与紧凑城市:界线空间概念之评述,见:建筑与规划学报,2002/10
[159]江哲铭,李彦颐.国际永续建筑对应技术-「SB2002第二届永续建筑国际研讨会」全 记录.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,2003/04
[160]Rapoport.House Form and Culture,1969
[161]Rapoport.Human Aspects of Urban Form,1977
[162]Rapoport.The Meaning of the Built Environment,1982
[163]Brenner and Keil.The Global Cities Reader,2005
[164]Birch.Urban and Regional Planning Reader,2007
[165]Campbell and Fainstein.Readings in Planning Theory 2nd revised edition, 2003
[166]Bram Noble.Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment,2005
[167]Cheape,Moving the Masses:Urban Public Transit in New York,Boston,and Philadelphia,1880-1912,
[168]Cullingworth and Nadin.Town and Country Planning in England and Wales,14th ed,2006
[169]李永展.在地经营,全球接轨-永续发展式的城乡风貌.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中 华民国建筑师杂志,2003/04
[170]李永展,张晓婷.都市永续性侦测工具之研究-以台中都会区永续发展指标为例. 台北:社会文化学报,1999/06
[171]李永展.永续发展式的灾后重建.社会文化学报,2000/06
[172]ICMA,The Practice of Local Government Planning,2000
[173]Castells.European Cities,the Informational Society,and the Global Economy, 1993
[174]Castells.The Rise of the Network Society,1996
[175]Childe.What Happened in History,1951
[176]Alan Gilpin.Environmental Impact Assessment,2006
铩颷177]Alonso.Location and Land Use,1964
[178]Abu-Lughod.New York,Chicago,Los Angeles:America's Global Cities,2000
[179]John Friedmann.Planning in the Public Domain,1985
[180]Kasarda,John.超大型都市的环境问题及私人企业之角色:迈向生态永续发展的都市 化过程,人与地,1993/11
[181]Davidoff.Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning,1965
[182]Krumholz and Forester.Making Equity Planning Work:Leadership in the Public Sector,1990
[183]黄书礼,翁瑞豪.台北市永续发展指针系统之建立与评估.都市与计划,1997/03
[184]练有为.城市的永续发展-台北与新加坡之比较分析.台湾银行季刊,2001/03
[185]陈俊合.都市更新促进永续都市发展之研究.兰阳学报,2003/06
[186]Hall.Cities of Tomorrow:An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century,3rd edition,2002
[187]Hall,Cities in Civilization,1998
[188]Hall.Urban and Regional Planning 4th edition,2002
[189]Hall,and Borden.The City Cultures Reader 2nd edition by Miles,2003
[190]夏光.城市可持续性的环境维度:概念模型及对中国若干城市的实证分析.香港:中 国研究,1998/09
[191]Stone.The Politics of Urban Development,1987
[192]Stone.Urban regime and the capacity to govern:A political economy approach, 1993
[193]王小磷.永续的都市景观.造园季刊,1998/06
[194]Fishman.Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century,1982
[195]Gans.The Urban Villagers,1969
[196]Tonnies.Community and Society,1887
[197]Thompson.A Preface to Urban Economies,1965
[198]O'Sullivan.Urban Economics,5th edition,2002
[199]Van der Ryn and Cowan.Ecological Design,2001
[200]Vance.Capturing the Horizon:The Historical Geography of Transportation since The Sixteenth Century,1986
[201]Gottmann.Megalopolis:The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States,1964
[202]Weber.The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century,1899
[203]Young and Willmott.Family and Kinship in East London,1957
[204]Zukin.The Cultures of Cities,1995
[205]Sassen.The Impact of New Information Technologies and Globalization on Cities, 2001
[206]Sassen.The Global City:New York,London,Tokyo,2001
[207]Sassen.Cities in a Global Economy,3rd edition,2006
铩颷208]陈景润.组合数学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1985
[209]钟国辉.理想的城乡环境-永续城乡概念下的生态工业园区.永续产业发展,2002/08
[210]黄书礼,王安民.因应CO减量之永续都市规划策略-以台北市为例.规划学报, 2000/12
[211]李鎨翰.德国城市永续发展的思维与实践-以国际建筑展「安瑟公园」为例.见:林 志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,2001/03
[212]Francis.Urban Open Space:Designing For User Needs,2003
[213]Gillam.The Limitless City,A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate,2002
[214]陈金令.永续城市的生态与旧住宅的有机更新.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建 筑师杂志,2003/05
[215]Davis.City of Quartz:Excavating the Future in Los Angeles,1990
[216]Davis.The Urbanization of the Human Population,1965
[217]杨裕富,2000《空间设计-概论与设计法》,田园城市文化事业有限公司。
[218]Fulton and Shigley.Guide to California Planning 3rd edition,2005
[219]Geddes.Cities in Evolution,1915
[220]Hood.722 miles:The Building of the Subways and How They Transformed New York, 1993
[221]Jackson.The Crabgrass Frontier:The Suburbaization of the United States, 1985
[222]J.Levy.Contemporary Urban Planning 7th edition,2005
[223]谢庆达译,2002,(Edward Relph,1987),《现代都市地景》,田园城市文化事业有 限公司。
[224]谢庆达译,2002,(Roger Trancik1986),《找寻失落的空间-都市设计理论》,田园 城市文化事业有限公司。
[225]孔恩(1962),(科学革命的结构),程树德等译,远流出版:台北。
[226]张苏梅,顾朝林.深圳法定图则的几点思考-中、美法定层次规划比较研究.上海:城 市规划汇刊,2000年第24期No.8 P.31-35
[227]阮如舫.打开城市百宝盒.天津:百花文艺出版社,2004,p48
铩? 营建杂志社编印.住宅专业用语汇编.台北,1994,P.93
2 齐康.城市建筑.江苏:东南大学出版社,2001,PP.6-7
3 吴志强.2010中法建筑与城市发展论坛:上海世博会规划与城市和谐发展.上海:理想空间出版,2005,P.111
4 马文军.城市规划方法论.北京:城市规划,2005年11月P.29
5 阮仪三.城市建设与规划基础理论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1992,p.46
6 21世纪城市住区.Urban housing for the 21st century.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001,P.48
铩? 中国城市规划学会主编.中国当代城市设计精品集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000,P.6
8 陳婉钰,施植明,陳林蔚.都市設针容積管制之變更舆執行——以台北國際金融中心爲例.台北:中華民國建築學會第十八届第一次建築研究成果發表畲論文集,2006
9 城市在台湾称「都市」,本论文以城市进行论述,但若属专有名词仍以都市称之,如:台湾的「都市计画法」、「台北市政府都市发展局」。
铩?0 黄瑞茂,1993,建筑师杂志226期,p66-74。
铩?1 林钦荣.都市设计在台湾.台北:创新出版社,1995。
铩? 石铁矛.居住建筑快速设计图集.审阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1995,P.253
铩? 张松周瑾.论近现代建筑遗产保护的制度建设.见:建筑学报.北京:中国建筑学会出版,2005,p.7。
铩? 台北市政府都市发展局编印,.台北生态都市设计架构暨原则之研定,2003,P.1
铩? 陈淳,周浩明.传统街区建成环境意义的再思考——以使用者为认识主体的研究方法的提出.见:建筑师.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005第117期:p.5
5 阳明山国家公园位于台北市内。
铩? 沉清基.中国城市能源可持续发展研究:一种城市规划的视角.上海:城市规划学刊,2005年第160期P.41
铩? 江哲铭.共生「乐」、健康「活」.台北:第三届台北建筑论坛——共筑生命空间,2006,P.75
铩? 阮如舫.打开城市百宝盒.天津:百花文艺出版社,2004,p48
铩?1 周俭.城市住宅区规划原理.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,P.184
铩? 徐佳楢.都市天際線建耩之研究—台南市都市天際線建耩準則之研擬.台南:成功大学建筑學系,2000
铩颷1]李志刚,魏立华.西方城市规划理论及相关期刊述评.见:规划师.广西:规划师杂志社, 2005第120期:p.29
[2]营建杂志社编印.住宅专业用语汇编.台北,1994,P.93
[3]齐康.城市建筑.江苏:东南大学出版社,2001,PP.6-7
[4]吴志强.2010中法建筑与城市发展论坛:上海世博会规划与城市和谐发展.上海:理想 空间出版。2005,P.111
[5]马文军.城市规划方法论.北京:城市规划,2005年11月P.29
[6]阮仪三.城市建设与规划基础理论.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1992,P.46
[7]21世纪城市住区.Urban housing for the 21st century.北京:中国建筑工业出版 社,2001,P.48
[8]中国城市规划学会主编.中国当代城市设计精品集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000, P.6
[9]陈婉钰,施植明,陈林蔚.都市设计容积管制之变更与执行-以台北国际金融中心为 例.台北:中华民国建筑学会第十八届第一次建筑研究成果发表会论文集,2006
[10]余美凤,法令与裁量互动对都市发展之影响-以财产权观点探讨都市设计制度在台湾 之发展.台北:2000年中华民国住宅学会第九届年会论文集
[11]石铁矛.居住建筑快速设计图集.审阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1995,P.253
[12]台北市政府都市发展局编印,.台北生态都市设计架构暨原则之研定,2003,P.1
[13]陈淳,周浩明.传统街区建成环境意义的再思考——以使用者为认识主体的研究方法 的提出.见:建筑师.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005第117期:p.5
[14]沉清基.中国城市能源可持续发展研究:一种城市规划的视角.上海:城市规划学刊, 2005年第160期P.41
[15]江哲铭.共生[乐]、健康[活].台北:第三届台北建筑论坛——共筑生命空间,2006, P.75
[16]陈秉钊.保护与再生中的情理观.上海:同济大学
[17]周俭.城市住宅区规划原理.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,P.184
[18]张松周瑾.论近现代建筑遗产保护的制度建设.见:建筑学报.北京:中国建筑学会出 版,2005,p.7.
[19]林钦荣.都市设计在台湾.台北:创新出版社,1995
[20]陈明竺.都市设计.台北:创新出版社,1992
[21]Kevin Lynch.The openness of open space,City sense and city design,1972
[22]Lynch.The Image of the City,1961
[23]Lynch and Hack.Site Planning 3rd edition.1984
铩颷24]Lynch.Good City Form,1988
[25]吴纲立.从西方近代城市设计思潮的发展看台湾城市设计专业的定位.见:关华山主 编.建筑学报.台北:中华民国建筑学会出版,2006
[26]Castells,Manual.,The City and the Grassroots.Berkeley and Los Angeles. California University of California Press,1983
[27]郭琼莹.都市开放空间与都市美学.台北:艺术家出版社,1993
[28]Gosling,David.＆Barry Maitland.Concepts of Urban Design.London: Acndon:Academy,1985
[29]Lynch Kevin.City Design:What It is and How It Might be Taught.Purchase. New York:The Institute for Urban Design,1982
[30]Barnett,Jonathan.Urban Design as Public Policy.New York:McGraw-Hill,1974
[31]2003 International Conference on Planning and Design:sustainable environment and development,2003
[32]蔡定芳,林钦荣,夏铸九.城市设计研究班第一期讲义汇编.台北:台北市建筑师公会 印赠,1992
[33]R.B.Singh.Urban sustainability in the context of global change:towards promoting healthy and green cities,2001
[34]Mario Polese＆Richard Stren.The social sustainability of cities:diversity and the management of change,2000
[35]A.F.Foo＆Belinda Yuen.Sustainable cities in the 21st century,1999
[36]Philip Allmendinger＆Michael Chapman,Planning beyond 2000,1999
[37]林钦荣.都市的经营理念-都市公共空间环境品质的观察与省思.见:林志崧,黄健敏 主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,1992
[38]刘宪宗.都市公共开放空间系统的建构-丹佛的实例.台北的借镜.台北:造园季刊, 1992
[39]董圆圆.都市设计管制对开放空间之开放性的形塑作用研究:[硕士学位论文].台北: 淡江大学建筑学系,2004
[40]黄昆山.自开发管制理念探讨台湾城市设计之定位与功能.见:城市与计划,2006
[41]吴佩瑛,施伯宜.台湾县市生活品质水准之比较.见:台湾经济,1996第240 期:pp.26-38
[42]王振寰,黄书纬.从社会主义城市到世界城市:上海城市调节模式的转型.台北:台 湾社会学刊,2001
[43]李少甫.理想城市与紧凑城市:界线空间概念之评述.台北:建筑与规划学报,2002/10
[44]中、日、韩之城市指标汇编.中日韩城市计划学会国际学术交流研讨会.台北:中华 民国城市计划学会
[45]台北市政府城市发展局.修订综合发展计划-永续发展城市之发展目标及策略之研拟 -国外城市发展评析.台北:中华民国城市计划学会
[46]张庭传.城市高速发展中的城市设计问题:关于城市设计原则的讨论.上海:城市规 划汇刊,2001年第3期:5-11
铩颷47]陈景润.组合数学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1985
[48]丁荣生.台北市城市设计城市审议制度运作十多年有感-访文化大学市政系陈明竺主 任.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,1993/11:58-59
[49]王价巨.台北市城市设计审议经验之研究:[硕士学位论文].台北:台湾大学建筑与城 乡研究所,1998
[50]台北市建筑师公会.台北市城市设计审议制度信息化作业.台北:台北市城市发展 局,2003
[51]邱茂林.城市景观计算机视觉仿真程序与技术之研究.台北:内政部建筑研究所专题 研究计划成果报告,1999
[52]黄昆山.台湾城市实施城市设计工作之可行性研究.台北:国科会专题研究计划(NSC82-0301-H006-030T),1993
[53]现代都市街道景观设计.Elements＆total concepts of urban pavement design eng. 台北:新形象出版公司编辑部,1993
[54]David Banister.Transport policy and the environment,1998
[55]J.Breuste,H.Feldmann＆O.Uhlmann(eds.)Urban ecology:1998
[56]Peter Hall＆Colin Ward,Sociable cities:the legacy of Ebenezer Howard, 1998
[57]Belinda Yuen,Planning Singapore:from plan to implementation,1998
[58]Michael E.Bonine,Population,poverty,and politics in Middle East cities, 1997
[59]乔纳森.巴奈特(Barnett,Jonathan)谢庆达,庄建德译.都市设计概论.台北:创新 出版社,1993
[60]蒋晓梅.都市化冲击下营造适居性都市环境之有效途径.多向度市镇规划设计理念及 其空间架构之研究An effect:An effective way of the building livable urban environment under the impact of urbanization a research of the design concept and the space-structure of planning a multi-dimensional town,1993
[61]Chakrabary,B.K.Urban Management-Concepts,Principle.Techniques and Education,Cities,2001,Vol 18(5):331-345
[62]Ducan,J.S.and Ducan,N.,Rercording the Landscape,Environment and Planning D:Society and space,1988 Vol(6):117-126
[63]Hubbard,P.,Urban design and Local Economic Development,Cities,1995Vol 12(4): 243-251
[64]Punter,J.V.,().Post-modernism,Planning Practice and Research,1998 Vol(4):22-28
[65]Christopher Alexander等原著.黄瑞茂译.新的都市设计理论,1994
[66]韦恩·奥图(wayne Attoe),唐·洛干(Donn Logan)作,王劭方译.美国都市建筑城 市设计的触媒:美国都市建筑城市设计的触媒
[67]朱文一.空间、符号、城市 一种城市设计理论.Space·Symbol·city a theory of urban design
铩颷68]Cechini,A.,New information＆communication technologies and the professions of town and regional planners.Computers,Environment and Urban System,1999, pp.151-172
[69]Roger Trancik着,谢庆达译.都市设计理论:找寻失落的空间,1996
[70]Jacob,Allen B.,Education for Successful Practice,Education for Urban Design 1982,[27]Purchase,New York:The Institute for Urban Design, pp.118-121.
[71]King,R.J.,Urban Design In Capitalist Society,1988
[72]Appleyard,Donald,et al.,1982b,”Three Kinds of Urban Design Practice”, 《Education for Urban Design》,New York:The Institute for Urban Design, pp.122-126.
[73]王建国.现代都市设计理论和方法Modern urban design theory and method
[74]Marcus and Francis.People Places:Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, 2002
[75]Macdonald and Larice.Urban Design Reader,2007
[76]卢芬芬.实施都市设计地区都市开放空间原则性规范之研究:以高雄市为例A study of open space guideline in urban design area as an example of Kaoshing city
[77]Ranzinger,M.,＆Gunther Gleixner,GIS datasets for 3D urban planning, Computers,Environment and Urban System.1997 Vol.21(2):159-173
[78]Seder,I.,R.Weinkauf,＆T.Neumann,Knowledge-based databases and intelligent decision support for environmental management in urban systems,2000
[79]Jonathan Barnett,1974:舒达恩,1983
[80]McHarg.Design with Nature,1969
[81]Mitchell.E-topia,2001
[82]Gruber,Michael＆Erich Wilmersdorf,Urban data management-A modern approach, Computers,Environment and Urban System,1997 Vol.21(2):147-158
[83]Levinson,Paul.Digital Mcluhan-A guide to the information millennium. New York,Routledge,Taylor＆Francis Group press,2001
[84]王价巨.台北市都市设计审议经验之研究A study on the urban design review experience of Taipei 1997
[85]六合出版社编译.都市景观设计:元素及总体概念.台北:六合出版社编译,1991
[86]王旭斌.类型管制之都市设计方法:以台北市内湖二期重划区为例Type Control as a language of urban design,2001
[87]专题研习报告:2002新加坡及马来西亚都市设计与景观规划The seminar of urban design and landscape planning台北:行政院人事行政局地方行政研习中心出 版,2003
[88]Lin and Male.Urban Sociology Reader,2004
[89]Stein.Classic Readings in Urban Planning 2nd edition,2004
[90]Spirn.The Granite Garden:Urban Nature and Human Design,1985
铩颷91]Lo and Yeung.Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia,1996
[92]Savage,Ward,and Ward.Urban Sociology,Capitalism and Modernity:Second Edition,2003
[93]Wooley.Sumerians,1928
[94]Sinel.The Metropolis and Mental Life,1903
[95]Watson and Bridge.The Blackwell City Reader,2003
[96]Laquian.Beyond Metropolis:The Planning and Governance of Asia's Mega-Urban Regions,2005
[97]Sitte.The Art of Building Cities:City Building According to its Artistic Fundamentals,1889
[98]Scott.American City Planning Since 1890,1985
[99]Sennett.Class ic Essays On The Culture Of Cities,1969
[100]Wheeler,et al.Planning Sustainable and Livable Cities,2006
[101]Wirth.Urbanism as a Way of Life,1938
[102]陈荆洲.实施都市设计地区景观计划之研究:以新市区建设地区为例A study of landscape planning in urban design as an example of new urban development area撰,2003
[103]Mellart.catal Huyuk:a Neolithic Town in Anatolia,1967
[104]Macionis and Parillo.Cities and Urban Life 4th Edition,2006
[105]Reps.The Making Of Urban America:A History of City Planning In The United States,1965
[106]Routledge.The Cybercities Reader,2003
[107]Peter Morris.Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment,2001
[108]赖美如.以放射状铁道网向都心集中的空间结构-东京都市构造与交通问题.见:林 志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[109]郑弘佩.大生活圈的局促住居-东京都会区的居住现状及课题.见:林志崧,黄健敏 主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[110]Jacob,Allen B.,Education for Urban Design,1982
[111]Mollenkopf.The Postwar Politics Of Urban Development,1975
[112]Mollenkopf.A Phoenix in the Ashes:The Rise and Fall of the Koch Coalition in New York City Politics,1992
[113]Mollenkopf and Strom.The Urban Politics Reader,2006
[114]蔡学义,张立立.参加一九九五年中日韩都市计划学会国际学术交流暨调查汉城国际 化都市发展.台北市政府所属各机关因供出国人员出国报告
[115]E.Howard.Tomorrow:A Peaceful Path to Real Reform,1898
[116]F.Wright.Broadacre City,1935
[117]Andreas Faludi.A Reader in Planning Theory,1973
[118]Allmendinger.Planning Theory,2002
[119]赵翔.走向健康建筑-变迁中的医院建筑.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师 杂志
铩颷120]堀边宪二.以舒适空间为芯的都会建设:东京的经验.空间杂志第64期
[121]Le Corbusier.The City of Tomorrow and its Planning,1929
[122]Campbell and Fainstein.Readings in Planning Theory 2nd revised edition,2003
[123]Krumholz and Forester.Making Equity Planning Work:Leadership in the Public Sector,1990
[124]许盛美,许盛莉译.阿姆斯特丹与荷兰中部
[125]施鸿志.地区竞争力指标体系建构之研究.台北:国科会专题研究(NS C89-2415-H-006-014)
[126]Taylor.Urban Planning Theory Since 1945,1998
[127]Taylor.Anglo-American Town Planning Theory Since 1945:Three Significant Developments But No Paradigm Shifts,1999
[128]Bassett.The Master Plan,With A Discussion of the Theory of Community Land Planning Legislation,1938
[129]李威仪.东京都会2000-东京都会环境今与昔.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建 筑师杂志
[130]李威仪.京都会圈的变迁与发展.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[131]Garvin et al.Urban Parks and Open Space,1997
[132]Garvin.The American City:What Works,What Doesn't,2002
[133]Kent.The Urban General Plan,1964
[134]行政院国家科学委员会专题研究计划成果报告.都市空间发展与国家体制-上海与 台北之比较.台北:台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所
[135]Susan Fainstein.New Directions in Planning Theory,2000
[136]Rodwin＆Sanyal.The Profession of City Planning:Changes,Images and Challenges:1950-2000.2000
[137]Mazza,Mandelbaum,and Burchell.Explorations in Planning Theory,1996
[138]王惠君.东京的历史环境保存.见:空间杂志第93期
[139]王惠君.浮世绘、不思议之都-从江户到东京-东京都会的形成.见:林志崧,黄健 敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志
[140]Boyer.Dreaming the Rational City:The Myth of American City Planning,1986
[141]Clarke.The European City and Green Space:London,Stockholm,Helsinki And St.Petersburg,1850-2000,2000
[142]Calthorpe and Fulton.The Regional City,2001
[143]Barther.City People:The Rise of Modern City Culture in the 19th Century America,1982
[144]Burnham.Plan for Chicago,1909(2006版)
[145]Hohenberg and Lees.The Making of Urban Europe 1000-1950,1985
[146]Hack.Planning Metropolitan Regions,2001
铩颷147]J.Barnett.Redesigning Cities:Principles,Practice and Implementation, 2003
[148]Krueckeberg.The American Planner 2nd edition,1994
[149]Kaiser,Godschalk,and Berke.Urban Land Use Planning,5th Edition,2006
[150]Lang.Urban Design:The American Experience,1994
[151]LeGates and Stout.The City Reader 4th edition,2007
[152]Larry Cantor.Environmental Impact Assessment,1995
[153]Jacobs.The Death and Life of Great American Cities,1961
[154]Judd and Kantor.American Urban Politics:The Reader,4th edition,2005
[155]J.Jacob.The Economy of Cities,1970
[156]台北市政府都市发展局.巴黎-台北都市发展研讨会,巴黎都市发展报告.
[157]中华民国都市计划学会.修订综合发展计划-永续发展城市之发展目标及策略之研 拟-国外城市发展评析.台北市政府都市发展局
[158]李少甫.理想城市与紧凑城市:界线空间概念之评述,见:建筑与规划学报,2002/10
[159]江哲铭,李彦颐.国际永续建筑对应技术-「SB2002第二届永续建筑国际研讨会」全 记录.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,2003/04
[160]Rapoport.House Form and Culture,1969
[161]Rapoport.Human Aspects of Urban Form,1977
[162]Rapoport.The Meaning of the Built Environment,1982
[163]Brenner and Keil.The Global Cities Reader,2005
[164]Birch.Urban and Regional Planning Reader,2007
[165]Campbell and Fainstein.Readings in Planning Theory 2nd revised edition, 2003
[166]Bram Noble.Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment,2005
[167]Cheape,Moving the Masses:Urban Public Transit in New York,Boston,and Philadelphia,1880-1912,
[168]Cullingworth and Nadin.Town and Country Planning in England and Wales,14th ed,2006
[169]李永展.在地经营,全球接轨-永续发展式的城乡风貌.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中 华民国建筑师杂志,2003/04
[170]李永展,张晓婷.都市永续性侦测工具之研究-以台中都会区永续发展指标为例. 台北:社会文化学报,1999/06
[171]李永展.永续发展式的灾后重建.社会文化学报,2000/06
[172]ICMA,The Practice of Local Government Planning,2000
[173]Castells.European Cities,the Informational Society,and the Global Economy, 1993
[174]Castells.The Rise of the Network Society,1996
[175]Childe.What Happened in History,1951
[176]Alan Gilpin.Environmental Impact Assessment,2006
铩颷177]Alonso.Location and Land Use,1964
[178]Abu-Lughod.New York,Chicago,Los Angeles:America's Global Cities,2000
[179]John Friedmann.Planning in the Public Domain,1985
[180]Kasarda,John.超大型都市的环境问题及私人企业之角色:迈向生态永续发展的都市 化过程,人与地,1993/11
[181]Davidoff.Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning,1965
[182]Krumholz and Forester.Making Equity Planning Work:Leadership in the Public Sector,1990
[183]黄书礼,翁瑞豪.台北市永续发展指针系统之建立与评估.都市与计划,1997/03
[184]练有为.城市的永续发展-台北与新加坡之比较分析.台湾银行季刊,2001/03
[185]陈俊合.都市更新促进永续都市发展之研究.兰阳学报,2003/06
[186]Hall.Cities of Tomorrow:An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century,3rd edition,2002
[187]Hall,Cities in Civilization,1998
[188]Hall.Urban and Regional Planning 4th edition,2002
[189]Hall,and Borden.The City Cultures Reader 2nd edition by Miles,2003
[190]夏光.城市可持续性的环境维度:概念模型及对中国若干城市的实证分析.香港:中 国研究,1998/09
[191]Stone.The Politics of Urban Development,1987
[192]Stone.Urban regime and the capacity to govern:A political economy approach, 1993
[193]王小磷.永续的都市景观.造园季刊,1998/06
[194]Fishman.Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century,1982
[195]Gans.The Urban Villagers,1969
[196]Tonnies.Community and Society,1887
[197]Thompson.A Preface to Urban Economies,1965
[198]O'Sullivan.Urban Economics,5th edition,2002
[199]Van der Ryn and Cowan.Ecological Design,2001
[200]Vance.Capturing the Horizon:The Historical Geography of Transportation since The Sixteenth Century,1986
[201]Gottmann.Megalopolis:The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States,1964
[202]Weber.The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century,1899
[203]Young and Willmott.Family and Kinship in East London,1957
[204]Zukin.The Cultures of Cities,1995
[205]Sassen.The Impact of New Information Technologies and Globalization on Cities, 2001
[206]Sassen.The Global City:New York,London,Tokyo,2001
[207]Sassen.Cities in a Global Economy,3rd edition,2006
铩颷208]陈景润.组合数学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1985
[209]钟国辉.理想的城乡环境-永续城乡概念下的生态工业园区.永续产业发展,2002/08
[210]黄书礼,王安民.因应CO减量之永续都市规划策略-以台北市为例.规划学报, 2000/12
[211]李鎨翰.德国城市永续发展的思维与实践-以国际建筑展「安瑟公园」为例.见:林 志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建筑师杂志,2001/03
[212]Francis.Urban Open Space:Designing For User Needs,2003
[213]Gillam.The Limitless City,A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate,2002
[214]陈金令.永续城市的生态与旧住宅的有机更新.见:林志崧,黄健敏主编.中华民国建 筑师杂志,2003/05
[215]Davis.City of Quartz:Excavating the Future in Los Angeles,1990
[216]Davis.The Urbanization of the Human Population,1965
[217]杨裕富,2000《空间设计-概论与设计法》,田园城市文化事业有限公司。
[218]Fulton and Shigley.Guide to California Planning 3rd edition,2005
[219]Geddes.Cities in Evolution,1915
[220]Hood.722 miles:The Building of the Subways and How They Transformed New York, 1993
[221]Jackson.The Crabgrass Frontier:The Suburbaization of the United States, 1985
[222]J.Levy.Contemporary Urban Planning 7th edition,2005
[223]谢庆达译,2002,(Edward Relph,1987),《现代都市地景》,田园城市文化事业有 限公司。
[224]谢庆达译,2002,(Roger Trancik1986),《找寻失落的空间-都市设计理论》,田园 城市文化事业有限公司。
[225]孔恩(1962),(科学革命的结构),程树德等译,远流出版:台北。
[226]张苏梅,顾朝林.深圳法定图则的几点思考-中、美法定层次规划比较研究.上海:城 市规划汇刊,2000年第24期No.8 P.31-35
[227]阮如舫.打开城市百宝盒.天津:百花文艺出版社,2004,p48
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |