我国农业产业生态福利水平测度及提升策略研究
|
摘要
长期以来,我国沉浸在工业化快速发展的显著呈现中,对工业化引发的环境问题以及向农村的蔓延尚未给予足够的重视。中国是农业大国,拥有数量庞大的农业从业人员,解决好农村生态环境及农业生产环境问题,实现农业资源的适度开发与高效循环利用,既是两型农业建设的要求,也是寻求“三农”问题解决的路径突破与重要选择,有助于实现农业的良性可持续发展,更是奠定了国民经济持续健康发展与国家安全的基础。而要推动农业的可持续发展,必须重视农业的生态效益,实现农业更快更好的发展。本研究就湖北省现代农业产业发展现状(基于生态视角)、农业产业生态福利的测度与模糊评价以及农业产业生态福利实现过程中各利益主体博弈行为及特征进行了全面的统计与测度分析,较为全面的了解湖北省农业产业发展的生态福利现状、发展趋势以发展潜力,并且全面系统了解湖北省农业产业发展生态效率及产业可持续发展的现状的基础上,最终提出了全面提升我省农业产业生态福利水平的策略。主要研究工作及结论如下：
(一)湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现持续下降趋势,农业产业可持续发展遇到瓶颈
第一,1990-2011年湖北省农业人口发展指数、农业人口的人均生态足迹与农业经济发展同步增长。第二,农业产业发展的生态福利指数呈现波动变化,总体呈现下降趋势,且在2000年达到农业产业生态福利的峰值1.9773,本文将湖北省农业发展生态福利的演变划分为5个阶段：第一个阶段(1990-1993),湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现逐渐下降趋势；第二个阶段(1993-1994),农业产业发展的生态福利指数上升；第三阶段(1994-1998)湖北农业产业发展的生态福利指数呈现微弱波动下降趋势；第四阶段(1998-2000),湖北省农业产业发展的生态福利指数反弹,快速增加并达到生态福利指数峰值；第五阶段(2000-2011),湖北省农业产业发展生态福利指数在微弱波动中呈现快速下降趋势。虽然湖北省农业发展呈现一定的福利水平增长趋势,但是由于农业产业的生态资源负荷的增长远远超过了生态福利的增长幅度,引致农业产业生态福利指数的波动下滑。第三,1990-2011年湖北省农业产业发展的演变可以划分为三个阶段,经历了由可持续性减弱到增强再到减弱的变化。第四,19902011年,湖北省农业人口发展指数与人均产值双双增长,但是随着人均产值的迅速增长,农业人口发展指数增长趋势逐步放缓。随着湖北省农业经济的快速发展,农业经济增长带来的经济福利和生态福利门槛还未到达,但是增速放慢,意味着在向门槛值靠近。换句话说,湖北省近20年的农业发展模式已经不适应当前生态需求日盛的形势,农业经济增长的生态福利门槛很快到达。
(二)湖北农业产业生态福利主要受到农户的生产生活方式及农业自然生态环境变化的制约,其产业生态福利水平为一般,有较大提升空间
一是,当前农业产业生态福利微观视角的测度或评价主要由农户生产方式影响维度、农户生活方式影响维度、农业自然生态环境影响维度三块主要内容,这其中各因子的方差贡献率依次为：农户生产方式影响占比为23.42%,农户生活方式影响因子占比为16.73%,农业自然生态环境影响因子占比为14.36%,三因子累计比例达到了54.51%。二是利用农户调研数据,基于模糊综合评价结果表明当前农业产业发展方式下的生态福利水平仍有较大改善空间,福利测度结果仅为71.38,参照有关标准认定评价情况“一般”。三是基于实证分析结果给予的政策涵义包括：(1)加强认识,注重舆论力量,切实加快农业增长方式的转变；(2)关注农业生产实际,引导农民生产种植习惯,普及亲环境的农业生产技术和组织方式；(3)加强农村生态文明建设,提高居民环保意识,积极营造良好的村庄环境；(4)重视农村生态环境保护,改善水土质量,加大环境污染惩治力度,构建和谐美好的外部环境。
(三)农业产业生态福利相关利益主体的利益诉求存在差异,农业产业生态福利目标难以实现
就农业产业生态目标实现过程中的利益主体博弈行为特征展开的分析,研究分析表明中央政府、地方政府和农业产业经营者在农业产业生态目标实现过程中的利益诉求并不一致,再加上中央政府与地方政府间、地方政府与农业产业经营者间、中央政府与农业生产者存在较为显著的信息不对称问题,严重制约产业生态目标的实现。以三方主体的动态博弈模型为基础,寻求利益均衡点,可知：一方面,各利益主体在农业产业生态目标的实现过程中的参与主体是一种非零和游戏,存在共同利益诉求,三者的利益均衡点是存在的,因此各利益主体有持续供给努力的动力；另外一方面在理论上可以预见,当中央政府、地方政府和农业产业经营者在农业产业生态目标实现过程中的努力投入显著异于零时,农业产业生态福利水平的目标能够得以实现,各方都能达成自身的利益诉求。
文章的最后提出了：加强政府法规体系、组织管理机制、社会参与机制、资金投入机制、信息网络建设机制的建立与完善的政策建议。同时,提出了调控农资供应市场,建立生态农业补偿机制；制定农业环境相关标准,加强生态农产品管理；鼓励生态农业技术创新,开发农业环保技术等未来政策趋向。
主要的创新点为：
(1)研究视角上具有一定的新意。已有的关于福利的研究大多侧重于经济福利和社会福利,对生态福利的研究较少；已有的关于农业产业的研究多集中在宏观方面,主要有宏观发展趋势、战略策略以及模式与效益等,对产业福利的研究很少。笔者提出了农业产业的生态福利问题,这既是对福利研究的补充,也是对农业产业研究的扩展,具有一定的创新。
(2)研究方法应用上具有一定的新意。关于生态福利测度的研究,已有的研究大多集中在宏观层面上,从环境的角度出发分析生态效益。本文扩展了已有的研究路径,分别从宏观层面、微观层面进行生态福利测度的定量研究,并尝试构建三方动态博弈来分析农业产业生态主体的福利状况。
(3)研究内容具有一定的新意,且取得了一些有价值的结论。根据课题研究内容,展开了微观层面与和宏观层面生态福利的实证研究,主要在两个方面取得了一些有价值的结论,一是湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现持续下降趋势,农业产业的生态福利营造及产业持续发展面临环境与资源压力；二是湖北省农业产业生态福利的主要制约因素是农户生产生活方式及农业自然生态环境,且产业生态福利水平不高,有较大提升空间。
For a long time, our country is paying attention to industry of environmental protection and urban environmental problems while ignoring the rural ecological environment protection;at the same time,the academia is not to the rural ecological environment protection as the important object of study. As the world's most populous and on agriculture as the main body of Chinese population, protect rural ecological environment, promote the rational development and efficient utilization of agricultural resources, is not only an important part of building a conservation oriented agriculture, but also a major measure to solve the"Agriculture,Countryside and Farmer"issues and achieve sustainable development of agriculture and plays an important role in the healthy development of the national economy and state safety. To promote the sustainable development of agriculture,our country must pay attention to the ecological benefits of agriculture, realize agriculture better and faster development. The study current situation of the development of modern agriculture industry in hubei province (based on the ecological perspective), measure and the fuzzy evaluation of ecological benefits of agricultural industry and agricultural industry ecological benefits achieved all the stakeholders in the process of game behavior and characteristics of the comprehensive statistics and measure analysis, a more comprehensive understanding the present situation of the ecological benefits for the development of agricultural industry in hubei province, development trend, development potential and a comprehensive system to understand the ecological efficiency of the agricultural industry development in hubei province and the present situation of the industrial sustainable development, on the basis of the final proposed comprehensively promotes our province agricultural ecological welfare level of strategy. The main research work and conclusions are as follows:
(a) In Hubei province, agriculture ecological welfare index showed a trend of declining industry, the sustainable development of agriculture industry bottlenecks encountered
First,from1990to2011the population of Hubei Agricultural Development Index per capita ecological footprint of agriculture simultaneous growth of population and agricultural economic development pace.Second, the ecological benefits of agriculture industry development index showed fluctuations, the overall downward trend and reached a peak of1.9773agricultural ecological benefits in2000, this paper divided the development of agricultural development in Hubei Province ecological benefit into5stages:the first stage(1990-1993), the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare index decreased; second stage(1993-1994), the agricultural industry development and ecological well-being index rose; the third stage(1994-1998) the development of Hubei agriculture ecological welfare index showed a weak fluctuation a downward trend; the fourth stage(1998-2000), the development of agricultural industrialization in Hubei Province Ecological Welfare index rebound, the rapid increases and reaches a peak of fifth Ecological Welfare Index;fifth stage(2000-2011), index of ecological benefits the development of agricultural industrialization in Hubei province showed a rapid downward trend in the weak fluctuation. Although the development of agricultural industry in hubei province ecological welfare level enhances unceasingly, but due to the growth of the agricultural ecological resource load far exceeds the ecological benefits of growth, leading to decline in agricultural ecological welfare index volatility. Third, in1990-2011the evolution of agricultural industry development in Hubei province can be divided into three stages, experienced by the sustainable reduced to the enhancement and weakening change. Fourth,1990-2011, Hubei Province, the agricultural population development index and the agricultural production value of average per capita has also increased, but with the rapid growth of agricultural output value per person, the agricultural population development index trend growth slowing. With the rapid development of economy of Hubei province agriculture, agricultural economic growth economic benefits and ecological benefits are still reach threshold.But But growth is slowing down, means that near to the threshold. In other words, the agricultural development mode in Hubei Province in recent20years has not adapted to the current situation of ecological demand is growing, the growth of agricultural economy and ecological well-being threshold arrive soon.
(b) The peasant way of life and the natural ecological environment of agriculture is an important factor that affects the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological benefits.The Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare in a general level,and have a bigger promotion space
First, the current agricultural ecological benefits from the perspective of measurement or evaluation is mainly composed of farmers production, farmer life style factors influence dimension, the natural ecological environment of agriculture influence of dimension three main contents, the variance contribution rate of each factor in turn: household production accounted for23.42%, farmer life style factors accounted for16.73%, the natural ecological environment of agriculture factors accounted for14.36%, three factor accumulation ratio reached54.51%. Two is the use of household survey data, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results show that the current development of Ecological Welfare agricultural industry still has a great space to improve the welfare measure based on the results, only71.38, with reference to the relevant standards for evaluation of "general". The three is the empirical analysis results and policy implications based on given including:(1) strengthen the understanding, focus on the force of public opinion, to accelerate the transformation of agricultural growth mode;(2) pay attention to agricultural production practice, guiding farmers to plant habit, popularization of dear environment of agricultural production technology and organization mode;(3) strengthen the rural ecological civilization construction, raising the environmental awareness of residents, and actively create a good village environment;(4) pay attention to the rural ecological environment protection, improve water quality, increase environmental pollution punishment, build a harmonious external environment.
(c) The interests of agricultural ecological benefits of stakeholders have different goals, ecological benefits of agricultural industry is difficult to achieve
On the analysis of agricultural ecological goal game behavior in the process of development, research and analysis shows that the central government, local government and agricultural industry operators are not consistent in the agricultural ecological objective interests. In the process, coupled with the central government and local government, local government and agricultural industry between the operators, the central government and the agricultural industry operators have distinct information forces known problems, realize agricultural ecological objectives leads to restrict the behavior of stakeholders. Through the game analysis model of three parties and the final solution, and obtain the following policy implications:on the one hand, have shared interests of all stakeholders in the implementation process of agricultural ecological objectives, can form a win-win situation, therefore the stakeholders need to continue to supply efforts; the other hand can foresee in theory, when the central government, local government and the agricultural industry operators in the ecological agriculture industry in the process of achieving the objective of effort is significantly different from zero, the welfare level agricultural ecological objectives can be achieved, the parties can reach their own appeal.
The article finally proposed: We should strengthen the government regulation system, organization and management mechanism, social participation mechanism, investment mechanism, the establishment and perfection of mechanism of information network construction. At the same time, put forward to control the supply of agricultural means of production market, establish ecological agriculture compensation mechanism; to establish the agricultural environment related standards, strengthen ecological agricultural products management;encouraging ecological agriculture technology innovation, develop the agriculture of environmental protection, such as technology policy trend in the future.
The main innovation point:
(1) The research perspective and content has a new idea. Research on welfare has mostly focused on the economy and social welfare, but about ecological benefits'researchs are less; Study on agricultural industry has mostly focused on the agricultural industry development present situation, problem, countermeasure, pattern, benefit, the industrial welfare research rarely. The author puts forward the ecological benefits of agricultural industry, this is a supplement to the welfare research, extension of agricultural industry research, has some innovation.
(2) The research methods have some new ideas on the application. The existing research on Ecological welfare measure mostly concentrated on the macro level, from the environmental perspective analysis of ecological benefit. This paper extends the existing research path, quantitative study of ecological welfare measure separately from the macro level, micro level analysis, and try to build three side dynamic game to analyze tripartite welfare of agricultural ecological subjects.
(3) And obtain some valuable conclusions. According to the research, an empirical study on the micro level and macro level, mainly in two aspects to obtain some valuable conclusions, one is the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare index has continued to decline, the sustainable development of agriculture industry bottlenecks encountered; The second is farmer's production and life style and the natural ecological environment of agriculture is an important factor that affects the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological benefits, the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare level for the general, have bigger promotion space.
(一)湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现持续下降趋势,农业产业可持续发展遇到瓶颈
第一,1990-2011年湖北省农业人口发展指数、农业人口的人均生态足迹与农业经济发展同步增长。第二,农业产业发展的生态福利指数呈现波动变化,总体呈现下降趋势,且在2000年达到农业产业生态福利的峰值1.9773,本文将湖北省农业发展生态福利的演变划分为5个阶段：第一个阶段(1990-1993),湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现逐渐下降趋势；第二个阶段(1993-1994),农业产业发展的生态福利指数上升；第三阶段(1994-1998)湖北农业产业发展的生态福利指数呈现微弱波动下降趋势；第四阶段(1998-2000),湖北省农业产业发展的生态福利指数反弹,快速增加并达到生态福利指数峰值；第五阶段(2000-2011),湖北省农业产业发展生态福利指数在微弱波动中呈现快速下降趋势。虽然湖北省农业发展呈现一定的福利水平增长趋势,但是由于农业产业的生态资源负荷的增长远远超过了生态福利的增长幅度,引致农业产业生态福利指数的波动下滑。第三,1990-2011年湖北省农业产业发展的演变可以划分为三个阶段,经历了由可持续性减弱到增强再到减弱的变化。第四,19902011年,湖北省农业人口发展指数与人均产值双双增长,但是随着人均产值的迅速增长,农业人口发展指数增长趋势逐步放缓。随着湖北省农业经济的快速发展,农业经济增长带来的经济福利和生态福利门槛还未到达,但是增速放慢,意味着在向门槛值靠近。换句话说,湖北省近20年的农业发展模式已经不适应当前生态需求日盛的形势,农业经济增长的生态福利门槛很快到达。
(二)湖北农业产业生态福利主要受到农户的生产生活方式及农业自然生态环境变化的制约,其产业生态福利水平为一般,有较大提升空间
一是,当前农业产业生态福利微观视角的测度或评价主要由农户生产方式影响维度、农户生活方式影响维度、农业自然生态环境影响维度三块主要内容,这其中各因子的方差贡献率依次为：农户生产方式影响占比为23.42%,农户生活方式影响因子占比为16.73%,农业自然生态环境影响因子占比为14.36%,三因子累计比例达到了54.51%。二是利用农户调研数据,基于模糊综合评价结果表明当前农业产业发展方式下的生态福利水平仍有较大改善空间,福利测度结果仅为71.38,参照有关标准认定评价情况“一般”。三是基于实证分析结果给予的政策涵义包括：(1)加强认识,注重舆论力量,切实加快农业增长方式的转变；(2)关注农业生产实际,引导农民生产种植习惯,普及亲环境的农业生产技术和组织方式；(3)加强农村生态文明建设,提高居民环保意识,积极营造良好的村庄环境；(4)重视农村生态环境保护,改善水土质量,加大环境污染惩治力度,构建和谐美好的外部环境。
(三)农业产业生态福利相关利益主体的利益诉求存在差异,农业产业生态福利目标难以实现
就农业产业生态目标实现过程中的利益主体博弈行为特征展开的分析,研究分析表明中央政府、地方政府和农业产业经营者在农业产业生态目标实现过程中的利益诉求并不一致,再加上中央政府与地方政府间、地方政府与农业产业经营者间、中央政府与农业生产者存在较为显著的信息不对称问题,严重制约产业生态目标的实现。以三方主体的动态博弈模型为基础,寻求利益均衡点,可知：一方面,各利益主体在农业产业生态目标的实现过程中的参与主体是一种非零和游戏,存在共同利益诉求,三者的利益均衡点是存在的,因此各利益主体有持续供给努力的动力；另外一方面在理论上可以预见,当中央政府、地方政府和农业产业经营者在农业产业生态目标实现过程中的努力投入显著异于零时,农业产业生态福利水平的目标能够得以实现,各方都能达成自身的利益诉求。
文章的最后提出了：加强政府法规体系、组织管理机制、社会参与机制、资金投入机制、信息网络建设机制的建立与完善的政策建议。同时,提出了调控农资供应市场,建立生态农业补偿机制；制定农业环境相关标准,加强生态农产品管理；鼓励生态农业技术创新,开发农业环保技术等未来政策趋向。
主要的创新点为：
(1)研究视角上具有一定的新意。已有的关于福利的研究大多侧重于经济福利和社会福利,对生态福利的研究较少；已有的关于农业产业的研究多集中在宏观方面,主要有宏观发展趋势、战略策略以及模式与效益等,对产业福利的研究很少。笔者提出了农业产业的生态福利问题,这既是对福利研究的补充,也是对农业产业研究的扩展,具有一定的创新。
(2)研究方法应用上具有一定的新意。关于生态福利测度的研究,已有的研究大多集中在宏观层面上,从环境的角度出发分析生态效益。本文扩展了已有的研究路径,分别从宏观层面、微观层面进行生态福利测度的定量研究,并尝试构建三方动态博弈来分析农业产业生态主体的福利状况。
(3)研究内容具有一定的新意,且取得了一些有价值的结论。根据课题研究内容,展开了微观层面与和宏观层面生态福利的实证研究,主要在两个方面取得了一些有价值的结论,一是湖北省农业产业生态福利指数呈现持续下降趋势,农业产业的生态福利营造及产业持续发展面临环境与资源压力；二是湖北省农业产业生态福利的主要制约因素是农户生产生活方式及农业自然生态环境,且产业生态福利水平不高,有较大提升空间。
For a long time, our country is paying attention to industry of environmental protection and urban environmental problems while ignoring the rural ecological environment protection;at the same time,the academia is not to the rural ecological environment protection as the important object of study. As the world's most populous and on agriculture as the main body of Chinese population, protect rural ecological environment, promote the rational development and efficient utilization of agricultural resources, is not only an important part of building a conservation oriented agriculture, but also a major measure to solve the"Agriculture,Countryside and Farmer"issues and achieve sustainable development of agriculture and plays an important role in the healthy development of the national economy and state safety. To promote the sustainable development of agriculture,our country must pay attention to the ecological benefits of agriculture, realize agriculture better and faster development. The study current situation of the development of modern agriculture industry in hubei province (based on the ecological perspective), measure and the fuzzy evaluation of ecological benefits of agricultural industry and agricultural industry ecological benefits achieved all the stakeholders in the process of game behavior and characteristics of the comprehensive statistics and measure analysis, a more comprehensive understanding the present situation of the ecological benefits for the development of agricultural industry in hubei province, development trend, development potential and a comprehensive system to understand the ecological efficiency of the agricultural industry development in hubei province and the present situation of the industrial sustainable development, on the basis of the final proposed comprehensively promotes our province agricultural ecological welfare level of strategy. The main research work and conclusions are as follows:
(a) In Hubei province, agriculture ecological welfare index showed a trend of declining industry, the sustainable development of agriculture industry bottlenecks encountered
First,from1990to2011the population of Hubei Agricultural Development Index per capita ecological footprint of agriculture simultaneous growth of population and agricultural economic development pace.Second, the ecological benefits of agriculture industry development index showed fluctuations, the overall downward trend and reached a peak of1.9773agricultural ecological benefits in2000, this paper divided the development of agricultural development in Hubei Province ecological benefit into5stages:the first stage(1990-1993), the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare index decreased; second stage(1993-1994), the agricultural industry development and ecological well-being index rose; the third stage(1994-1998) the development of Hubei agriculture ecological welfare index showed a weak fluctuation a downward trend; the fourth stage(1998-2000), the development of agricultural industrialization in Hubei Province Ecological Welfare index rebound, the rapid increases and reaches a peak of fifth Ecological Welfare Index;fifth stage(2000-2011), index of ecological benefits the development of agricultural industrialization in Hubei province showed a rapid downward trend in the weak fluctuation. Although the development of agricultural industry in hubei province ecological welfare level enhances unceasingly, but due to the growth of the agricultural ecological resource load far exceeds the ecological benefits of growth, leading to decline in agricultural ecological welfare index volatility. Third, in1990-2011the evolution of agricultural industry development in Hubei province can be divided into three stages, experienced by the sustainable reduced to the enhancement and weakening change. Fourth,1990-2011, Hubei Province, the agricultural population development index and the agricultural production value of average per capita has also increased, but with the rapid growth of agricultural output value per person, the agricultural population development index trend growth slowing. With the rapid development of economy of Hubei province agriculture, agricultural economic growth economic benefits and ecological benefits are still reach threshold.But But growth is slowing down, means that near to the threshold. In other words, the agricultural development mode in Hubei Province in recent20years has not adapted to the current situation of ecological demand is growing, the growth of agricultural economy and ecological well-being threshold arrive soon.
(b) The peasant way of life and the natural ecological environment of agriculture is an important factor that affects the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological benefits.The Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare in a general level,and have a bigger promotion space
First, the current agricultural ecological benefits from the perspective of measurement or evaluation is mainly composed of farmers production, farmer life style factors influence dimension, the natural ecological environment of agriculture influence of dimension three main contents, the variance contribution rate of each factor in turn: household production accounted for23.42%, farmer life style factors accounted for16.73%, the natural ecological environment of agriculture factors accounted for14.36%, three factor accumulation ratio reached54.51%. Two is the use of household survey data, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results show that the current development of Ecological Welfare agricultural industry still has a great space to improve the welfare measure based on the results, only71.38, with reference to the relevant standards for evaluation of "general". The three is the empirical analysis results and policy implications based on given including:(1) strengthen the understanding, focus on the force of public opinion, to accelerate the transformation of agricultural growth mode;(2) pay attention to agricultural production practice, guiding farmers to plant habit, popularization of dear environment of agricultural production technology and organization mode;(3) strengthen the rural ecological civilization construction, raising the environmental awareness of residents, and actively create a good village environment;(4) pay attention to the rural ecological environment protection, improve water quality, increase environmental pollution punishment, build a harmonious external environment.
(c) The interests of agricultural ecological benefits of stakeholders have different goals, ecological benefits of agricultural industry is difficult to achieve
On the analysis of agricultural ecological goal game behavior in the process of development, research and analysis shows that the central government, local government and agricultural industry operators are not consistent in the agricultural ecological objective interests. In the process, coupled with the central government and local government, local government and agricultural industry between the operators, the central government and the agricultural industry operators have distinct information forces known problems, realize agricultural ecological objectives leads to restrict the behavior of stakeholders. Through the game analysis model of three parties and the final solution, and obtain the following policy implications:on the one hand, have shared interests of all stakeholders in the implementation process of agricultural ecological objectives, can form a win-win situation, therefore the stakeholders need to continue to supply efforts; the other hand can foresee in theory, when the central government, local government and the agricultural industry operators in the ecological agriculture industry in the process of achieving the objective of effort is significantly different from zero, the welfare level agricultural ecological objectives can be achieved, the parties can reach their own appeal.
The article finally proposed: We should strengthen the government regulation system, organization and management mechanism, social participation mechanism, investment mechanism, the establishment and perfection of mechanism of information network construction. At the same time, put forward to control the supply of agricultural means of production market, establish ecological agriculture compensation mechanism; to establish the agricultural environment related standards, strengthen ecological agricultural products management;encouraging ecological agriculture technology innovation, develop the agriculture of environmental protection, such as technology policy trend in the future.
The main innovation point:
(1) The research perspective and content has a new idea. Research on welfare has mostly focused on the economy and social welfare, but about ecological benefits'researchs are less; Study on agricultural industry has mostly focused on the agricultural industry development present situation, problem, countermeasure, pattern, benefit, the industrial welfare research rarely. The author puts forward the ecological benefits of agricultural industry, this is a supplement to the welfare research, extension of agricultural industry research, has some innovation.
(2) The research methods have some new ideas on the application. The existing research on Ecological welfare measure mostly concentrated on the macro level, from the environmental perspective analysis of ecological benefit. This paper extends the existing research path, quantitative study of ecological welfare measure separately from the macro level, micro level analysis, and try to build three side dynamic game to analyze tripartite welfare of agricultural ecological subjects.
(3) And obtain some valuable conclusions. According to the research, an empirical study on the micro level and macro level, mainly in two aspects to obtain some valuable conclusions, one is the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare index has continued to decline, the sustainable development of agriculture industry bottlenecks encountered; The second is farmer's production and life style and the natural ecological environment of agriculture is an important factor that affects the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological benefits, the Hubei province agriculture industrial ecological welfare level for the general, have bigger promotion space.
引文
1 Cronbach,L.J."Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests",Psychometrika,1951(16):297-334.
[1]庇古.福利经济学[M].北京：华夏出版社,2007
[2]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,2006.
[3]王丽.我国两税合并的社会经济福利效应分析[J].财经研究,2008(3)：18-19.
[4]唐华.经济福利、弹性与政府政策[J].南京财经大学学报,2003(1)：30-33.
[5]BROWN W. Trade deals a blow to the environment [J]. New Scientist,1990,(10):20-28.
[6]WERNER A, BRIAN R.Is free trade good for the environment? [Z]. NBER Working Paper, 1998, NO.6707.
[7]俞升.东西部地区吸引外资的竞争对地区福利效应的影响[J].开发研究,2006
[8]丁辉侠,冯宗宪.服务业FDI自由化与我国经济福利关系实证分析[J].亚态经济,2008(2)：88-89.
[9]阚大学.外商直接投资、对外贸易与福利关系的实证研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(4)：56-57.
[10]BURGESS D F. Is trade liberalization in the services sector in the nationalinterest? [Z]. Oxford Economic Paper, 1995.
[11]王树同.从流量到存量：中国经济高增长中的低经济福利问题[J].河北学刊,2005(7).
[12]陶一桃.“消费者剩余”与社会经济福利感[J].学术研究,2006(4)
[13]田野.技术创新的社会经济福利浅析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2001(4)
[14]左昊华.天津保税区社会经济福利水平的实证评价[J].天津财经学院学报,2004(4)
[15]陈珂.中国经济祸利的动态及社会福利的可持续改善研究[D].武汉理工大学,2004.
[16]吴松岭.我国对外贸易经济福利参数的计量与研究[D].北京工业大学.2003
[17]马雪彬,胡建光.区域金融发展、财政支出与经济福利[J].经济经纬.2012(1)
[18]Midgley J. Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 1995.
[19]Barber. Robert L. The Social Work Dictionary[M]. Washington D. C: NASW Press, 1999.
[20]方福前,吕文慧.中国城镇居民福利水平影响因素分析[J].管理世界,2009(4)： 17?26
[21]熊跃根,中国福利体制建构与发展的社会基础[J].经济社会体制比较,2010(5)： 63-72.
[22]贺雪峰.坚持“低消费、高福利”的新农村建设方向[J].学习月刊,2006(11)
[23]郑功成.社会保障学——理念、制度、实践与思辨.商务印书馆.2000年9月版
[24]史柏年.治理：社区建设的新视野[J].社会工作,2006(7)
[25]钱宁.社会福利制度改革背景下中国社会工作发展的历史与特色[J].社会工作,2011
[26]林义.文化与社会保障改革发展漫谈[J].中国社会保障,2012(3)
[27]关信平.经济全球化、社会不平等与中国社会政策转型——兼论加入WTO后的新挑战[J].东南学术,2002(12)
[28]景天魁.底线公平与社会保障的柔性调节[J].社会学研究.2004,06.
[29]杨团.中国社会政策演进、焦点与建构[J].学习与实践,2006(11)
[30]刘继同.由集体福利到市场福利—转耳,时期中国农民福利政策模式研究[J].中国农村观察,2002(5)：36-44.
[31]徐道稳.农村社会福利的制度转型和政策选择[J].广东社会科学,2006(7)
[32]李锐,朱喜.农户金融抑制及其福利损火的计量分析[J].经济研究,2007(2)：146-155
[33]许光.社会排斥卜的城市新贫困群体福利改善研究[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2009(1)：65-70.
[34]Robert A. Cummins. Personal Income and Subjective Well-being: A Review[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2000 (2):133-158.
[35]Carol Graham. The Economics of Happiness. Forthcoming in Steven Durlauf and Larry Blume, eds[M]. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2007.
[36]黄有光.金钱能买快乐吗?[M]四川人民出版社,2002年.
[37]朱建芳,杨晓兰.中国转型期收入与幸福的实证研究[J].统计研究,2009(4)： 7-12.
[38]Robert J. Barro. Inequality and Growth in a panel of countries[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2000 (5):5-32.
[39]陆铭,陈钊,万光华.因患寡,而患不均一中国的收入差距、投资、教育和增长的相互影响[J].经济研究,2005(12)：4-14.
[40]Jie Zhang. Long(?)Run Effects of Unfunded Social Security with Earnings(?)Dependent Benefits[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003 (3):617-641.
[41]林治芬.中国社会保障的地区差异及其转移支付[J].财经研究,2002(5)： 37-43.
[42]庄子银,邹薇.公共支出能否促进经济增长：中国的经验分析[J].管理世界,2003(7)：4-12.
[43]诸大建,徐萍.中国政府规模、经济增长与福利[J].同济大学学报,2010(4)：107-114.
[44]刘继同.社会福利：中国社会的建构福利制度创新路向[J].哈尔滨工业人学报,2003(5)：1-8.
[45]宋十云.新中国社会福利制度发展的历史考察[J].中国经济史研究,2009(3)：56-65.
[46]杨开忠.谁的生态最文明—中国各省区市生态文明大排名[J].中国经济周刊,2009
[47]樊雅莉.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009
[48]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].生态福利,2009,(1).
[49]张云飞.试论社会建设的生态方向[J].北京行政学院学报,2010,(4)
[50]武扬帆.社会工作视角下的生态福利社会化[J].理论新探,2010(4)
[51]Andrew Sha rpelA Survey of Indicators o f Economic and Social Well-being [EB/OL] 1 http: //wwwlcslslca/res_reportslasp, 19991
[52]Nick Donovan et a 11 Life Satisfaction: The State of Know ledge and Implications for Government [EB/OL] 1 United Kingdom Treasury Paper, 20021
[53]Ste fan Bergheiml Measure of Well-being: There is More to It than GDP [J] 1 http://wwwl dbresearchl com,20061
[54]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[J].北京：商务印书馆,2006.
[55]AIC1 Pigoul The Economics of Welfare[M] 1 London:Macmillan, 1929
[56]W illiam Nordhaus, Jam es Tob in l Is Growth Obsolete?[A]1 Economic Growth [C] New York: Columbia University Press, 19721
[57]La rs Osberg, Andrew SharpelAn Index of Economic W e 11-being for Canada [EB/OL] http:/ /wwwl cslsl ca,19981
[58]杨晓荣.分阶段灵活运用多指标衡量经济福利-从GNH与GDP的关系出发浅谈经济福利指标的选用[J].时代金融,2012(2)
[59]戴建兵.构建与我国中等收入水平相适应的适度普惠型社会福利制度[J].华东经济管理.2012(8)
[60]逯进,陈阳,郭志仪.社会福利、经济增长与区域发展差异[J].中国人口科学,2012
[61]La rs Osberg, Andrew SharpelAn Index of Economic W e 11-being for Canada [EB/OL] http:/ /wwwl cslsl ca,19981
[62]马传栋等.可持续城市经济发展论[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[63]曲格平.发展循环经济是21世纪的大趋翔习.中国环保产业,2001(7)6-7
[64]诸大建.可持续发展呼唤循环经济[J].科技导报,1998(9)：39.42
[65]Boulding K.E.The economics of the coming spaceship earth[A].Jalttt H.Environmental quality in a growing economy[C].Baltimore:RF F/John Hopkins Press,1966:3-14
[66]国家环保总局科技标准司.循环经济和生态工业规划汇编[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2004：42-5,85
[67]吴玉萍.循环经济若干理论问题[J].中国发展观察,2005(6)：30-32
[68]任勇.中外循环经济的比较[J]中国环境报,2004-7-2
[69]奚旦立.清洁生产与循环经济[m].北京：化学工业出版社,2003,224-237
[70]沈耀良.循环经济—原理及其发展战略[A].见：毛如柏,冯之浚.论循环经济[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2003：128-139
[71]黄有光,周建明等译.福利经济学[M].北京：中国友谊出版公司,1991.
[72]哈维,罗森,马欣仁,陈茜译.财政学[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,1992.
[73]李特尔著,陈彪译.福利经济学评述[M].北京：商务印书馆,1966：304.
[74]孙月平等编著应用福利经济学[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004：2.
[75]王秀峰.农业的多功能性及价值[J].专论：组织、制度与农村发展,2007.7：271-278
[76]欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5)：635-640
[77]章家恩,饶卫民.农业生态系统的服务功能与可持续利用对策探讨[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4)：99-102
[78]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].化学工业出版社,2007：14.
[79]国家统计局.2006年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]新华网http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-02/28/content578542412.htm.
[80]孙建,孔卓.我国林业实施“走出去”战略势在必行[EB/OL]http://www.eximbank.gov.cn/hwtz/2006/1_06.doc.
[81]王晓宇.生态农业建设与水资源可持续利用[M].北京：中国水利水电出版社,2008：80.
[82]刘彦.转型期农业生态安全问题研究[D].东北林业大学博士学位论文,2007：58.
[83]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：15.
[84]纪江玮.菜篮子里漏下的公害[EB/OL] http://www.lunwentianxia.com/product.free.10014164.1/.
[85]关于我国生物多样性现状及保护[EB/OL]http://hiray.bokee.com/4170975.html.
[86]邹声文.我国生物多样性遭遇挑战[EB/OL]生物谷网.http://www.bioon.com/popular/library/200406/40789.html.
[87]陈雷.中国的水土保持[J].中国水土保持,2002a,(4)：4-6.
[88]中国荒漠化和沙化土地[EB/OL]数字中国网http://www.china001.com/show hdr.php?xname=PPDDMV0&dname=0ESSK41&xpos=22..
[89]易凌.中国荒漠化和沙化土地面积建国以来首次缩小[J].草业科学,2005,22(7)：115.
[90]冯砚青.中国酸雨状况和自然成因综述及防治对策探究[J].云南地理环境研究,2004,16(1)：25-26.
[91]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：18.
[92]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：26.
[93]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春：吉林人民出版社,1997.
[94]刘思华.可持续发展经济学[M].武汉：湖北人民出版社,1997.
[95]叶文虎.联合国可持续发展指标体系述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1997,7(03)：83-87.
[96]中国科学院可持续发展战略研究组.1999中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京：科学出版社,1999：152-164.
[97]Daly H E, Cobb J B ed. For the Common Good:Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future [M]. Boston:Beacon Press,1989:401-455.
[98]Clifford Cobb, Ted Halstead, Jonathan Rowe. If the GDP is Up, Why is America Down? [J]. The Atlantic Monthly. Oct. 1995.
[99]United Nations Development Program. Human development report 1990[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1990:10.
[100]阿玛蒂亚·森.论经济不平等———不平等之再考察[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006.
[101]REES W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environ Urban,1992,4(02):121-130.
[102]The Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force.2002 Environmental Sustainability Index [R]. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting2002:Davos, Switzerland, Jan 2002.
[103]韩雪梅,马振民,王惠.青岛市可持续发展评价[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,25(03)：274-277.
[104]李瑞.唐山市可持续发展水平研究[D].河北：河北师范大学,2008.
[105]汉斯·范登德尔,本·范·韦尔瑟芬.民主与福利经济学[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[106]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].绿色经济,2009,(01)：90-116.
[107]樊雅丽.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009,29(06)：132-135.
[108]刘继同.生态运动与绿色主义福利思想：生态健康科学与新型公共卫生框架[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,21(03)：66-70.
[109]诸大建,孟维华,徐萍.1980—2005年中国经济增长对福利的贡献[A].第三届(2008)中国管理学年会论文集[C].625-636.
[110]赵志强,叶蜀君.东中西部地区差距的人类发展指数估计[J].华东经济管理,2005,19(12)：22-25.
[111]Wackernagel. Our Ecological Footprint Reducing Human Impact on the earth [M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers. 1996.
[112]Max-Neef M. Economic growth and quality of life:A threshold hypoth-esis [J]. Ecological Economics, vol,15, No2,1995:115-118.
[113]诸大建,徐萍.福利提高的三个“门槛”及政策意义[J].社会科学,2010,(03)：32-41.
[114]诸大建.生态文明：需要深入勘探的学术疆域[J].探索与争鸣,2008,(06)：5-11.
[115]Niccolucci V,FM Pulselli et al. Strengthening the thresh old hypothesis:Economic and biophysical limits to growth,Ecological Economics,vol 60,2007:667-672.
[116]王伟,韦苇.动态生态足迹的测度与分析——陕西省可持续发展研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛),2007,17(04)：52--56.
[117]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5)：607-613
[118]王秀峰.喀斯特地区农业可持续发展理论及其应用研究[M].北京：现代教育出版社,2008：95-126
[119]董光荣等.青海共和盆地十地沙漠化与防治途径[M].北京：科学出版社,1993.52-53
[120]张艳玲.2008年中国耕地面积净减29万亩[EB/OL].财经网 http://www.caijing.com.cn/2009-02-26/110074706.html.
[121]彭坷珊.主要地质灾害对我国城市发展的危害及整治对策[J].科学新闻周刊,2002(8)：34-35.
[122]郑义.中国生态崩溃紧急报告告[EB/OL]全球绿色资助基金会网http://www.greengrants.org.cn/poster/show.php?id=211.
[123]中国水资源现状[EB/OL].建设网http://www.buildnet.cn/Html/News/2008/03/5422.shtml.
[124]郑有贵.农业功能拓展：历史变迁与未来趋势[J].古今农业,2006(4)：35-39.
[125]陈文胜,王文强.农村生活垃圾环境污染问题与对策[EB/OL]慧聪环保网理论http://www.goepe.com/exhibition/zh news.php?id=35977&num=1.
[126]龚益.环境信息公开化的政府形象[EB/OL]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济所网站.http://iqte.cass.cn/iqteweb old/hjzx/lt01057.htm.
[127]李立国.2006年我国遭遇9年来最严重自然灾害[EB/OL]新华网http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-02/27/content5780641.htm.
[128]近年自然灾害频繁发生农业保险为何无大作为?[EB/OL].中国村庄网http://www.chinavillage.cn/articleshow.asp?articleid=999.
[129]萧美娟,林国才,庄玉惜.NGO市场营销、筹募与问责理论与操作[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[130]民政部社会工作司.国外及港台地区社会工作发展报告[M].北京：中国社会出版社,2010.
[131]王思斌.社会工作概论(第二版)[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2009.
[132]马传栋等.可持续城市经济发展论[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[133]范志海,阎更法.社会工作行政[M].上海：华东理工大学出版社,2006.
[134]周生贤.走和谐发展的生态文明之路[J].中国经济周刊,2008,(2).
[135]王雨辰.论生态学马克思主义的生态自然观和生态价值观[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2009,(2)
[136]张云飞.试论社会建设的生态方向[J].北京行政学院学报,2010,(4)
[137]夏学銮.论社会工作的内涵与外延[J].萍乡高等专科学校学报,2000,(2).
[138]范燕宁.社会工作专业的历史发展与基础价值理念[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(1).
[139]孙莹.社会工作者在我国城市反贫困中的使命和角色[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(1).
[140]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].生态福利,2009,(1).
[141]杨开忠.谁的生态最文明—中国各省区市生态文明大排名[J].中国经济周刊,2009,(32).
[142]武扬帆.社会工作在台湾[J].政工研究动态,2008,(8).
[143]樊雅莉.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009,(6).
[144]青秋蓉,杨发坤.社会工作视野下的高职学生心理健康教育[J].教育与教学研究.2009,(8).
[145]刘巽浩.论中国农业现代化与持续化[J].农业现代化研究.1998,(19),5：272-276.
[146]李文华.生态农业—中国可持续农业的理论与实践[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2003.
[147]程序,曾晓光,王尔大.可持续农业导论[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1997：10-22.
[148]林祥全.世界生态农业的发展趋势[J].中国农村经济,2003,(7)：76-79.
[149]李宏伟.美国有机农业发展态势[J].科技经济透视,2003,(2)：45-47,
[150]冒乃和,刘泼.德国有机农业发展面临的问题与对策[J].世界农业,2002,(10)：26-28.
[151]俞东平,杜相革,陈永民等.有机农业发展概况[J].世界农业,2002,(4)：15-18.
[152]梁志超.国外绿色食品发展的历程、现状及趋势[J].世界农业,2002,(1)：10-12.
[153]文凡.世界生态农业的发展趋势[A].中国特产报,2004—04—05—02
[154]中国农业科技信息网.世界有机农业发展现状与趋势[J].长江蔬菜,2003,(4)：57.
[155]农业部无公害农产品生产和管理考察团.加拿大的有机农业[J].世界农业,2002,(10)：24-25.
[162]王继军,谢永生,卢宗凡等.退耕还林还草下生态农业发展模式初探[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1)：134-137.
[157]周小萍,陈百明,卢燕霞等.中国几种生态农业产业化模式及其实施途径探讨[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(3)：298-300.
[158]李崇霄.日本大分县的环境保全型农业[J].世界农业,2002,(2)：32-33.
[1]庇古.福利经济学[M].北京：华夏出版社,2007
[2]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,2006.
[3]王丽.我国两税合并的社会经济福利效应分析[J].财经研究,2008(3)：18-19.
[4]唐华.经济福利、弹性与政府政策[J].南京财经大学学报,2003(1)：30-33.
[5]BROWN W. Trade deals a blow to the environment [J]. New Scientist,1990,(10):20-28.
[6]WERNER A, BRIAN R.Is free trade good for the environment? [Z]. NBER Working Paper, 1998, NO.6707.
[7]俞升.东西部地区吸引外资的竞争对地区福利效应的影响[J].开发研究,2006
[8]丁辉侠,冯宗宪.服务业FDI自由化与我国经济福利关系实证分析[J].亚态经济,2008(2)：88-89.
[9]阚大学.外商直接投资、对外贸易与福利关系的实证研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(4)：56-57.
[10]BURGESS D F. Is trade liberalization in the services sector in the nationalinterest? [Z]. Oxford Economic Paper, 1995.
[11]王树同.从流量到存量：中国经济高增长中的低经济福利问题[J].河北学刊,2005(7).
[12]陶一桃.“消费者剩余”与社会经济福利感[J].学术研究,2006(4)
[13]田野.技术创新的社会经济福利浅析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2001(4)
[14]左昊华.天津保税区社会经济福利水平的实证评价[J].天津财经学院学报,2004(4)
[15]陈珂.中国经济祸利的动态及社会福利的可持续改善研究[D].武汉理工大学,2004.
[16]吴松岭.我国对外贸易经济福利参数的计量与研究[D].北京工业大学.2003
[17]马雪彬,胡建光.区域金融发展、财政支出与经济福利[J].经济经纬.2012(1)
[18]Midgley J. Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 1995.
[19]Barber. Robert L. The Social Work Dictionary[M]. Washington D. C: NASW Press, 1999.
[20]方福前,吕文慧.中国城镇居民福利水平影响因素分析[J].管理世界,2009(4)： 17?26
[21]熊跃根,中国福利体制建构与发展的社会基础[J].经济社会体制比较,2010(5)： 63-72.
[22]贺雪峰.坚持“低消费、高福利”的新农村建设方向[J].学习月刊,2006(11)
[23]郑功成.社会保障学——理念、制度、实践与思辨.商务印书馆.2000年9月版
[24]史柏年.治理：社区建设的新视野[J].社会工作,2006(7)
[25]钱宁.社会福利制度改革背景下中国社会工作发展的历史与特色[J].社会工作,2011
[26]林义.文化与社会保障改革发展漫谈[J].中国社会保障,2012(3)
[27]关信平.经济全球化、社会不平等与中国社会政策转型——兼论加入WTO后的新挑战[J].东南学术,2002(12)
[28]景天魁.底线公平与社会保障的柔性调节[J].社会学研究.2004,06.
[29]杨团.中国社会政策演进、焦点与建构[J].学习与实践,2006(11)
[30]刘继同.由集体福利到市场福利—转耳,时期中国农民福利政策模式研究[J].中国农村观察,2002(5)：36-44.
[31]徐道稳.农村社会福利的制度转型和政策选择[J].广东社会科学,2006(7)
[32]李锐,朱喜.农户金融抑制及其福利损火的计量分析[J].经济研究,2007(2)：146-155
[33]许光.社会排斥卜的城市新贫困群体福利改善研究[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2009(1)：65-70.
[34]Robert A. Cummins. Personal Income and Subjective Well-being: A Review[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2000 (2):133-158.
[35]Carol Graham. The Economics of Happiness. Forthcoming in Steven Durlauf and Larry Blume, eds[M]. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2007.
[36]黄有光.金钱能买快乐吗?[M]四川人民出版社,2002年.
[37]朱建芳,杨晓兰.中国转型期收入与幸福的实证研究[J].统计研究,2009(4)： 7-12.
[38]Robert J. Barro. Inequality and Growth in a panel of countries[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2000 (5):5-32.
[39]陆铭,陈钊,万光华.因患寡,而患不均一中国的收入差距、投资、教育和增长的相互影响[J].经济研究,2005(12)：4-14.
[40]Jie Zhang. Long(?)Run Effects of Unfunded Social Security with Earnings(?)Dependent Benefits[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003 (3):617-641.
[41]林治芬.中国社会保障的地区差异及其转移支付[J].财经研究,2002(5)： 37-43.
[42]庄子银,邹薇.公共支出能否促进经济增长：中国的经验分析[J].管理世界,2003(7)：4-12.
[43]诸大建,徐萍.中国政府规模、经济增长与福利[J].同济大学学报,2010(4)：107-114.
[44]刘继同.社会福利：中国社会的建构福利制度创新路向[J].哈尔滨工业人学报,2003(5)：1-8.
[45]宋十云.新中国社会福利制度发展的历史考察[J].中国经济史研究,2009(3)：56-65.
[46]杨开忠.谁的生态最文明—中国各省区市生态文明大排名[J].中国经济周刊,2009
[47]樊雅莉.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009
[48]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].生态福利,2009,(1).
[49]张云飞.试论社会建设的生态方向[J].北京行政学院学报,2010,(4)
[50]武扬帆.社会工作视角下的生态福利社会化[J].理论新探,2010(4)
[51]Andrew Sha rpelA Survey of Indicators o f Economic and Social Well-being [EB/OL] 1 http: //wwwlcslslca/res_reportslasp, 19991
[52]Nick Donovan et a 11 Life Satisfaction: The State of Know ledge and Implications for Government [EB/OL] 1 United Kingdom Treasury Paper, 20021
[53]Ste fan Bergheiml Measure of Well-being: There is More to It than GDP [J] 1 http://wwwl dbresearchl com,20061
[54]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[J].北京：商务印书馆,2006.
[55]AIC1 Pigoul The Economics of Welfare[M] 1 London:Macmillan, 1929
[56]W illiam Nordhaus, Jam es Tob in l Is Growth Obsolete?[A]1 Economic Growth [C] New York: Columbia University Press, 19721
[57]La rs Osberg, Andrew SharpelAn Index of Economic W e 11-being for Canada [EB/OL] http:/ /wwwl cslsl ca,19981
[58]杨晓荣.分阶段灵活运用多指标衡量经济福利-从GNH与GDP的关系出发浅谈经济福利指标的选用[J].时代金融,2012(2)
[59]戴建兵.构建与我国中等收入水平相适应的适度普惠型社会福利制度[J].华东经济管理.2012(8)
[60]逯进,陈阳,郭志仪.社会福利、经济增长与区域发展差异[J].中国人口科学,2012
[61]La rs Osberg, Andrew SharpelAn Index of Economic W e 11-being for Canada [EB/OL] http:/ /wwwl cslsl ca,19981
[62]马传栋等.可持续城市经济发展论[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[63]曲格平.发展循环经济是21世纪的大趋翔习.中国环保产业,2001(7)6-7
[64]诸大建.可持续发展呼唤循环经济[J].科技导报,1998(9)：39.42
[65]Boulding K.E.The economics of the coming spaceship earth[A].Jalttt H.Environmental quality in a growing economy[C].Baltimore:RF F/John Hopkins Press,1966:3-14
[66]国家环保总局科技标准司.循环经济和生态工业规划汇编[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2004：42-5,85
[67]吴玉萍.循环经济若干理论问题[J].中国发展观察,2005(6)：30-32
[68]任勇.中外循环经济的比较[J]中国环境报,2004-7-2
[69]奚旦立.清洁生产与循环经济[m].北京：化学工业出版社,2003,224-237
[70]沈耀良.循环经济—原理及其发展战略[A].见：毛如柏,冯之浚.论循环经济[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2003：128-139
[71]黄有光,周建明等译.福利经济学[M].北京：中国友谊出版公司,1991.
[72]哈维,罗森,马欣仁,陈茜译.财政学[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社,1992.
[73]李特尔著,陈彪译.福利经济学评述[M].北京：商务印书馆,1966：304.
[74]孙月平等编著应用福利经济学[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004：2.
[75]王秀峰.农业的多功能性及价值[J].专论：组织、制度与农村发展,2007.7：271-278
[76]欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5)：635-640
[77]章家恩,饶卫民.农业生态系统的服务功能与可持续利用对策探讨[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4)：99-102
[78]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].化学工业出版社,2007：14.
[79]国家统计局.2006年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]新华网http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-02/28/content578542412.htm.
[80]孙建,孔卓.我国林业实施“走出去”战略势在必行[EB/OL]http://www.eximbank.gov.cn/hwtz/2006/1_06.doc.
[81]王晓宇.生态农业建设与水资源可持续利用[M].北京：中国水利水电出版社,2008：80.
[82]刘彦.转型期农业生态安全问题研究[D].东北林业大学博士学位论文,2007：58.
[83]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：15.
[84]纪江玮.菜篮子里漏下的公害[EB/OL] http://www.lunwentianxia.com/product.free.10014164.1/.
[85]关于我国生物多样性现状及保护[EB/OL]http://hiray.bokee.com/4170975.html.
[86]邹声文.我国生物多样性遭遇挑战[EB/OL]生物谷网.http://www.bioon.com/popular/library/200406/40789.html.
[87]陈雷.中国的水土保持[J].中国水土保持,2002a,(4)：4-6.
[88]中国荒漠化和沙化土地[EB/OL]数字中国网http://www.china001.com/show hdr.php?xname=PPDDMV0&dname=0ESSK41&xpos=22..
[89]易凌.中国荒漠化和沙化土地面积建国以来首次缩小[J].草业科学,2005,22(7)：115.
[90]冯砚青.中国酸雨状况和自然成因综述及防治对策探究[J].云南地理环境研究,2004,16(1)：25-26.
[91]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：18.
[92]吴东雷,陈声明等.农业生态环境保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2007：26.
[93]世界环境与发展委员会.我们共同的未来[M].长春：吉林人民出版社,1997.
[94]刘思华.可持续发展经济学[M].武汉：湖北人民出版社,1997.
[95]叶文虎.联合国可持续发展指标体系述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1997,7(03)：83-87.
[96]中国科学院可持续发展战略研究组.1999中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京：科学出版社,1999：152-164.
[97]Daly H E, Cobb J B ed. For the Common Good:Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future [M]. Boston:Beacon Press,1989:401-455.
[98]Clifford Cobb, Ted Halstead, Jonathan Rowe. If the GDP is Up, Why is America Down? [J]. The Atlantic Monthly. Oct. 1995.
[99]United Nations Development Program. Human development report 1990[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1990:10.
[100]阿玛蒂亚·森.论经济不平等———不平等之再考察[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2006.
[101]REES W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environ Urban,1992,4(02):121-130.
[102]The Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force.2002 Environmental Sustainability Index [R]. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting2002:Davos, Switzerland, Jan 2002.
[103]韩雪梅,马振民,王惠.青岛市可持续发展评价[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,25(03)：274-277.
[104]李瑞.唐山市可持续发展水平研究[D].河北：河北师范大学,2008.
[105]汉斯·范登德尔,本·范·韦尔瑟芬.民主与福利经济学[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1999.
[106]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].绿色经济,2009,(01)：90-116.
[107]樊雅丽.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009,29(06)：132-135.
[108]刘继同.生态运动与绿色主义福利思想：生态健康科学与新型公共卫生框架[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,21(03)：66-70.
[109]诸大建,孟维华,徐萍.1980—2005年中国经济增长对福利的贡献[A].第三届(2008)中国管理学年会论文集[C].625-636.
[110]赵志强,叶蜀君.东中西部地区差距的人类发展指数估计[J].华东经济管理,2005,19(12)：22-25.
[111]Wackernagel. Our Ecological Footprint Reducing Human Impact on the earth [M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers. 1996.
[112]Max-Neef M. Economic growth and quality of life:A threshold hypoth-esis [J]. Ecological Economics, vol,15, No2,1995:115-118.
[113]诸大建,徐萍.福利提高的三个“门槛”及政策意义[J].社会科学,2010,(03)：32-41.
[114]诸大建.生态文明：需要深入勘探的学术疆域[J].探索与争鸣,2008,(06)：5-11.
[115]Niccolucci V,FM Pulselli et al. Strengthening the thresh old hypothesis:Economic and biophysical limits to growth,Ecological Economics,vol 60,2007:667-672.
[116]王伟,韦苇.动态生态足迹的测度与分析——陕西省可持续发展研究[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛),2007,17(04)：52--56.
[117]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5)：607-613
[118]王秀峰.喀斯特地区农业可持续发展理论及其应用研究[M].北京：现代教育出版社,2008：95-126
[119]董光荣等.青海共和盆地十地沙漠化与防治途径[M].北京：科学出版社,1993.52-53
[120]张艳玲.2008年中国耕地面积净减29万亩[EB/OL].财经网 http://www.caijing.com.cn/2009-02-26/110074706.html.
[121]彭坷珊.主要地质灾害对我国城市发展的危害及整治对策[J].科学新闻周刊,2002(8)：34-35.
[122]郑义.中国生态崩溃紧急报告告[EB/OL]全球绿色资助基金会网http://www.greengrants.org.cn/poster/show.php?id=211.
[123]中国水资源现状[EB/OL].建设网http://www.buildnet.cn/Html/News/2008/03/5422.shtml.
[124]郑有贵.农业功能拓展：历史变迁与未来趋势[J].古今农业,2006(4)：35-39.
[125]陈文胜,王文强.农村生活垃圾环境污染问题与对策[EB/OL]慧聪环保网理论http://www.goepe.com/exhibition/zh news.php?id=35977&num=1.
[126]龚益.环境信息公开化的政府形象[EB/OL]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济所网站.http://iqte.cass.cn/iqteweb old/hjzx/lt01057.htm.
[127]李立国.2006年我国遭遇9年来最严重自然灾害[EB/OL]新华网http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-02/27/content5780641.htm.
[128]近年自然灾害频繁发生农业保险为何无大作为?[EB/OL].中国村庄网http://www.chinavillage.cn/articleshow.asp?articleid=999.
[129]萧美娟,林国才,庄玉惜.NGO市场营销、筹募与问责理论与操作[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[130]民政部社会工作司.国外及港台地区社会工作发展报告[M].北京：中国社会出版社,2010.
[131]王思斌.社会工作概论(第二版)[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2009.
[132]马传栋等.可持续城市经济发展论[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[133]范志海,阎更法.社会工作行政[M].上海：华东理工大学出版社,2006.
[134]周生贤.走和谐发展的生态文明之路[J].中国经济周刊,2008,(2).
[135]王雨辰.论生态学马克思主义的生态自然观和生态价值观[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2009,(2)
[136]张云飞.试论社会建设的生态方向[J].北京行政学院学报,2010,(4)
[137]夏学銮.论社会工作的内涵与外延[J].萍乡高等专科学校学报,2000,(2).
[138]范燕宁.社会工作专业的历史发展与基础价值理念[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(1).
[139]孙莹.社会工作者在我国城市反贫困中的使命和角色[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(1).
[140]张军.生态福利观念的兴起与医疗保障模式的转型[J].生态福利,2009,(1).
[141]杨开忠.谁的生态最文明—中国各省区市生态文明大排名[J].中国经济周刊,2009,(32).
[142]武扬帆.社会工作在台湾[J].政工研究动态,2008,(8).
[143]樊雅莉.生态福利的引入与社会化—一个社会政策的研究视角[J].河北学刊,2009,(6).
[144]青秋蓉,杨发坤.社会工作视野下的高职学生心理健康教育[J].教育与教学研究.2009,(8).
[145]刘巽浩.论中国农业现代化与持续化[J].农业现代化研究.1998,(19),5：272-276.
[146]李文华.生态农业—中国可持续农业的理论与实践[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2003.
[147]程序,曾晓光,王尔大.可持续农业导论[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1997：10-22.
[148]林祥全.世界生态农业的发展趋势[J].中国农村经济,2003,(7)：76-79.
[149]李宏伟.美国有机农业发展态势[J].科技经济透视,2003,(2)：45-47,
[150]冒乃和,刘泼.德国有机农业发展面临的问题与对策[J].世界农业,2002,(10)：26-28.
[151]俞东平,杜相革,陈永民等.有机农业发展概况[J].世界农业,2002,(4)：15-18.
[152]梁志超.国外绿色食品发展的历程、现状及趋势[J].世界农业,2002,(1)：10-12.
[153]文凡.世界生态农业的发展趋势[A].中国特产报,2004—04—05—02
[154]中国农业科技信息网.世界有机农业发展现状与趋势[J].长江蔬菜,2003,(4)：57.
[155]农业部无公害农产品生产和管理考察团.加拿大的有机农业[J].世界农业,2002,(10)：24-25.
[162]王继军,谢永生,卢宗凡等.退耕还林还草下生态农业发展模式初探[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1)：134-137.
[157]周小萍,陈百明,卢燕霞等.中国几种生态农业产业化模式及其实施途径探讨[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(3)：298-300.
[158]李崇霄.日本大分县的环境保全型农业[J].世界农业,2002,(2)：32-33.