用户名: 密码: 验证码:
对外直接投资,逆向技术溢出与母国技术进步
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
对外直接投资、逆向技术溢出属于国际技术溢出研究领域的一个分支。对国际技术溢出现象的研究源自技术对一国经济发展的重要性以及世界经济一体化程度的日益加深。在国际竞争越来越激烈的当前,技术水平对一国的综合实力起着至关重要的决定作用。
     虽然很多国际经济活动都有可能伴随着技术溢出,但是该领域的研究者主要关注以下三条国际技术溢出的渠道:对外直接投资、吸引外资、进口商品和服务①。
     自Lichtenberg&Porterie开启逆向技术溢出②的研究领域以来,部分学者对该领域的研究进行过发展。由于数据可得性的限制,目前对逆向技术溢出的研究相对较少。在已有的研究中,大多数学者认为对外直接投资所获得的东道国逆向技术溢出能够促进母国技术水平的提升。
     本文的研究也建立在国际技术溢出领域的已有研究之上,并且引入了“吸收能力”这一因素进行研究,本文首先对逆向技术溢出的研究做了一定深入和创新,在此基础上,欲解决以下问题:中国企业对外直接投资所获得的东道国逆向技术溢出能否促进中国整体技术水平的提升③?为了进行必要的原因分析,本文还研究了中国的研发资金存量和人力资本能否形成一定的吸收能力,以促进中国对逆向技术溢出的吸收④,为使得东道国逆向技术溢出对国内技术进步有促进作用,是否存在国内研发资金存量或人力资本的“门槛效应”?此外,本文最后在全文研究的基础上提出了一定的政策建议。
     本文的主要创新在于:1)将逆向人力资本溢出纳入了逆向技术溢出的研究范畴,进而将人力资本溢出纳入了国际技术溢出的研究范畴。传统研究都以研发资金溢出来代替技术溢出,而研发资金溢出的衡量指标是用研发资金投入来构造的,忽略了人力资本投入,本文第一章将会对“研发资金溢出”和“人力资本溢出”进行概念界定⑤,也会对本文引入人力资本溢出的原因进行说明。2)在吸收能力理论的基础上,提出了“抑制作用”这一概念。传统研究认为,母国的研发资金投入和人力资本能形成一定的吸收能力,促进母国对东道国逆向技术溢出的吸收;而本文认为,母国的研发资金投入和人力资本可能会对逆向技术溢出产生“抑制作用”,阻碍逆向技术溢出对母国技术水平的促进作用⑥。
     本文的第一章是绪论部分,提出了本文要研究的问题并且进行了相关概念界定,同时介绍了本文的章节安排和逻辑结构及研究方法,还指出了本文的创新及不足之处。第二章是理论基础部分,本文以国际技术溢出理论、吸收能力理论、“战略资产”寻求理论作为理论基础,在国际技术溢出理论和吸收能力理论的基础上构建起基本分析框架,在“战略资产”寻求理论的指导下提出政策建议。第二章对这三方面的理论及其研究方法进行了充分、详尽的阐述。
     第三章对逆向技术溢出研究领域进行了深入和发展,并做了一定的创新,为进一步对中国问题的研究提供理论和方法上的依据,同时其实证结论也具有一定的指导意义。第三章建立了理论模型,以说明逆向技术溢出对母国技术水平的影响机制;同时,第三章的理论部分还对吸收能力理论进行了发展,指出了“抑制作用”的存在;此外,本文理论模型还说明了母国在约束条件下最大化自身技术水平的策略。本文随后用OECD国家数据进行实证研究以检验理论模型,主要发现有:1)对外直接投资所获得的逆向研发资金溢出和逆向人力资本溢出可以促进母国技术进步;2)母国的研发资金存量(以及人力资本)对东道国的逆向研发资金溢出产生了“抑制作用”;3)母国的人力资本对东道国逆向人力资本溢出产生了“抑制作用”。
     第四章是本文的重点章节,开始对中国问题进行研究,以解决本文的核心问题。第四章第一节对中国对外直接投资的历史和现状进行了一定的研究,目的在于分析中国对外直接投资的行业分布和区域分布的发展和现状,同时还分析了中国对世界主要经济体的投资情况。研究发现,近年来,中国制造业的对外直接投资都占有一定的份额;此外,中国对欧美等发达国家和地区的投资呈现一定的上升趋势,并且其中制造业的投资占了较大份额(少数国家除外,比如澳大利亚和俄罗斯)。本文认为,制造业的对外直接投资是获取海外技术溢出的主要方式,并且发达国家和地区以及新兴工业化国家和地区是技术溢出的主要来源地,因此,中国的对外直接投资有可能获得东道国的逆向技术溢出。
     随后,第二节进行了企业层面的案例分析,研究发现,部分中国企业通过对外直接投资获得了东道国逆向技术溢出并且带来了企业自身的技术提升,而这样的东道国主要是一些发达国家和新兴工业化国家,如美国、日本、英国、法国、德国、韩国、新加坡等。企业层面技术的提升有可能带动国内整体技术的提升,因此,第二节的分析为进一步国家层面的实证研究做了铺垫。
     第三节采用上一章所建立的研究方法,通过计量分析来研究逆向技术溢出对中国整体技术水平的影响,本文采用全要素生产率来衡量国内技术水平,并且将逆向技术溢出分为逆向研发资金溢出和逆向人力资本溢出两类进行研究;同时,为了进行必要的原因分析,第三节还研究了国内的研发资金存量和人力资本能否形成一定的吸收能力,促进中国对逆向技术溢出的吸收,或者是否表现为“抑制作用”。通过第四章的研究,本文发现:1)在本文的研究年限中(1985年——2008年),整体而言,东道国逆向研发资金溢出和逆向人力资本溢出对国内技术水平没有显著的影响;2)对于逆向研发资金溢出而言,国内的人力资本可以形成一定的吸收能力,为使得逆向研发资金溢出对国内技术有正向的影响,存在国内人力资本的“门槛效应”,即,从2001年开始,逆向研发资金溢出经过国内人力资本的吸收,对国内技术水平有促进作用;3)对于逆向人力资本溢出而言,国内的研发资金存量可以形成一定的吸收能力,为使得逆向人力资本溢出对国内技术有正向影响,存在国内研发资金存量的“门槛效应”,即,从2004年开始,逆向人力资本溢出经过国内研发资金存量的吸收,对国内技术有促进作用。
     第五章是本文的结语部分,对全文的主要结论进行了归纳总结,并且提出了相应的政策建议。
     本文在国际技术溢出理论的基础上,对逆向技术溢出的研究进行了深入和发展,并且引入了吸收能力进行研究。相关理论认为,对外直接投资所获得的逆向技术溢出可以带来母国技术水平的提升,第三章的理论模型和实证检验也支持这一观点。对于中国而言,本文通过案例分析发现部分中国企业通过对外直接投资获得了东道国的逆向技术溢出并且带来了企业自身的技术提升;但是,国家层面的实证研究却发现东道国逆向技术溢出没有带来中国整体技术水平的显著提升(1985年到2008年的整体情况)。比较积极的发现是,中国的人力资本对逆向研发资金溢出形成了一定的吸收能力,当国内人力资本超过“门槛值”时,即,2001年(含)之后,逆向研发资金溢出经过国内人力资本的吸收对国内技术水平有促进作用;同时中国的研发资金存量对逆向人力资本溢出形成了吸收能力,当国内研发资金存量超过“门槛值”时,即,2004年(含)之后,逆向人力资本溢出经过国内研发资金存量的吸收对国内技术水平有促进作用。在此基础上,本文进行了一定的原因分析并且提出了相关政策建议,指出了未来中国对外直接投资可行的发展方向,这正是本文研究的意义所在。
The study of reverse technology spillovers belongs to the research field ofinternational technology spillovers. The research of international technologyspillovers originated from the importance of technology in the development of acountry’s economy and the depening of the world’s economic integration. Nowadays,technology becomes more and more important to a county’s national power while thecompetition between countries becomes more and more fierce.
     Although there may be a lot of international economy activities that consist oftechnology spillovers, researchers of international technology spillovers mainlyconcerns three of them: outward foreign direct investment, inward foreign directinvestment, and the import of goods and services.
     Nearly two decades ago, Lichtenberg and Porterie started toresearch reversetechnology spillovers.Some researchers followed them to re-study the problem andtried to make some developments. But until now, the study of reverse technologyspillovershas been limited due to the scarce of data. In all the studies that we can find,most of them thought that reverse technology spillovers contribute to the technologyof home countries.
     Standing on the theory of international technology spillovers and the theory of“absorptive capacity”, after a proper development of the theories and researchmethods, this paper wants to solve the following problems: Could reverse technologyspillovers that China’s firms got overseas promote China’s technology? If reversetechnology spillovers that China’s firms got cannot promote China’s technology, whatcan be the proper reasons? In order to analyse the reason, this paper also studies thefollowing problem: Does China’s R&D capital stock or human resources show someabsorptive capacity to reverse technology spillovers, and whether or not there is“threshold effect”?Besides, this paper gives some policy advicesin the last chapter.
     There are two main innovations in this paper:1) Bringing “reverse humancapital spillovers” into the research field of reverse technology spillovers, and thusbringing “human capital spillovers” into the research field of international technology spillovers.Classical studies used “R&D capital spillovers” to substitute technologyspillovers, however, the measurement of “R&D capitalspillovers” only considersR&D capital, ignores human capital. Chapter1will explain why I introduce “humancapital spillovers” to the research field.2) On the basis of absorptive capacity, offeringthe concept of “restraining effect”. Traditional researchers hold the view that R&Dcapital or human resources of home countries could show some absorptivecapacityand accelerate the absorption of reverse technology spillovers, but I think thatthere also can be some kind of “restraining effect” between the R&D capital orhuman resources of home countries and reverse technology spillovers, that is, theR&D capital or human resources of home countries may restrain the effect of reversetechnology spillovers.
     Chapter1is the introduction of the whole paper. In chapter one, I will introducethe problems this paper wants to solve, explain some concepts, show the logic andarrangement of the paper, and I will also introduce the research methods, innovationsand imperfections of the whole paper.
     In chapter2, I will introduce the theoretical basis of the paper. The study of thispaper stands on three theories: the theory of international technology spillovers, thetheory of absorptive capacity, and the theory of “strategic asset” seekingforeign directinvestment. This paper builds research method on the theory of internationaltechnology spillovers and the theory of absorptive capacity, and offers policy adviceson the theory of “strategic asset” seeking foreign direct investment.
     Chapter3makes some proper developments to the research of reversetechnology spillovers. This chapter offers research methods to the next chapter, andits empirical studies’ results have some guiding value for China, too. Thischapterbuildstheoretical models to illustrate how reverse technology spillovers affecthome countries’ technology; and the models also explain “restraining effect”; besides,the models illustrate home countries’ strategy to maximize their technology underconstraints. Then this chapter uses empirical studies to test the models. The empiricalstudies of chapter3uses the data of OECD countries, and the main discoveriesare:1)Reverse technology spillovers can promote home countries’ technology;2) Homecountries’ R&D capital stock and human capital show some “restraining effect” to reverse R&D capital spillovers respectively;3) Home countries’ human capital showssome “restraining effect” to reverse human capital spillovers.
     Chapter4is the core of the whole paper. In this chapter, I will study China’ssituation so as to solve the problems chapter1has put forward.
     The first part of chapter4studies the history and status quo of China’s outwardforeign direct investment, this part mainly studies the industry distribution and areadistribution of China’s outward direct investment, and it also studies China’sinvestment in the main economic integrities. The discoveries are:1) In the recentyears, China’s manufacturingfirms’ outward foreign direct investment take a smallportion of the whole outward foreign direct investment of China,2) China’sinvestment in developed countries began to increase,and most of the firms thatinvested in developed countries were mamufacturing firms(except for some countries,for example, Australia, Russian). This paper hold the view that manufacturing firms’outward direct investment is the maily way to get reverse technology spillovers, anddeveloped countries (or some newly industrialized countries) are the main resourcesof technology spillovers. Thus, China’s outward direct investment may get somereverse technology spillovers from overseas.
     The second part chooses some China’s firms to study their outward directinvestment in detail, and I find thatthose firms can get some reverse technologyspillovers from host countries like USA, Japan, UK, France, Germany, Korea,Singapore, etc.. And I also find that reverse technology spillovers can promote thetechnology of those firms.The increase of firms’ technology may contribute to thetechnology progress of China, thus the study of this part lays a foundation for thefollowing study.
     Using the research methods built in chapter3, the third partresearches therelationship betweenreverse technology spillovers and China’s technology (TFP), andin order to analyse the reason, this part also studies whether China’s R&D capitalstock/human resources shows some absorptive capacity or “restraining effect” toreverse technology spillovers. The main discoveries are:1)From1985to2008, as awhole, reverse technology spillovers cannot promote China’s technology;2) China’shuman capital shows some absorptive capacity to reverse R&D capital spillovers, and reverse R&D capital spillovers could promote China’s technology if China’s humancapital exceeded“threshold”, that is, from2001, reverse R&D capital spillovers couldpromote China’s technology after being absorbed by China’s human capital;3)China’s R&D capital stock shows some absorptive capacity to reverse humancapital spillovers, and reverse human capital spillovers could promote China’stechnology if China’s R&D capital stock exceeded“threshold”, that is, from2004,reverse human capital spillovers could promote China’s technology after beingabsorbed by China’s R&D capital stock.
     Chapter5concludes the whole paper, sums up the main discoveries of the paper,and offers some policy advices.
     Theories of international technology spillovers hold the view that reversetechnology spillovers can promote the technology of home countries. Chapter3’stheoretical models and empirical studies supportit. As for China, chapter4finds thatsome China’s firms benefit from reverse technology spillovers they got overseas, buthowever, from1985to2008, as a whole, I didn’t find some remarkable and positiverelationship between reverse technology spillovers and China’s whole technology.The positive findsare:1)China’s human resources show some absorptive capacity toreverse R&D capital spillovers, and reverse R&D capital spillovers could promoteChina’s technology if China’s human capital exceeded “threshold”;2) China’s R&Dcapital stock shows some absorptive capacity to reverse human capital spillovers, andreverse human capital spillovers could promote China’s technology if China’s R&Dcapital stock exceeded “threshold”.Then I give some proper reasons, put forwardsome policy advices, point out the feasible development path of China’s outwardforeign direct investment in the future, thus the study of this paper becomesmeaningful.
引文
[1] Aitken B.,A. Harrison.Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidencefrom Venezuela [J].American Economic Review89,1999:605-618
    [2] Alvaro Escribano,Andrea Fosfuri&Josep A,Tribó.Managing external knowledge flows:the moderating role of absorptive capacity [J].Research Policy,Vol.38,Issue1,2009:96-105
    [3] Andrea Caragliu,Peter Nijkamp.The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatialknowledge spillovers [J].Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute,No.08-119/3,2008
    [4] Andrea Fosfuri,Motta Massimo.Multinationals without advantages [J].Scandinavian Journalof Economics,Vol.101,1999:617-630
    [5] Andrea Goldstein.The internationalization of Indian companies:the case of Tata.CASIWorking Paper Series,No.08-02,2008
    [6] Andrea Goldstein,Federico Bonaglia,John Mathews.Accelerated internationalization byemerging multinationals:the case of white goods.Submitted for a focused issue of theJournal of International Business Studies entitled “International Expansion of EmergingMarket Businesses”,2006
    [7] Anna Arbussà,Germà Coenders.Innovation activities,use of appropriation instruments andabsorptive capacity:evidence from Spanish firms [J].Research Policy,36,2007:1545-1558
    [8] Benhabib&J. M. Spiegel.The roles of human capital in economic development:evidencefrom aggregate cross-country data [J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1994(34):143-173
    [9] Bing Xu.Mlutinational enterprises,technology diffusion,and host country productivitygrowth [J].Journal of Development Economics,62,2000:477-493
    [10] Bruce Kogut,Chang Sea Jin.Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign directinvestment in the United States [J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.73,1991:401-413
    [11] César Camisón,Beatriz Forés.Knowledge absorptive capacity:New insights for itsconceptualization and measurement [J].Journal of Business Research,2010:707-715
    [12] Damien J. Neven,Georges Siotis.Foreign direct investment in the European community:some policy issues [J].Oxford Review of Economic Policy,Vol.9,No.2,1993:72-93
    [13] Damien J. Neven,Georges Siotis.Technology sourcing and FDI in the EC:an empiricalevaluation [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,Vol.14,1996:543-560
    [14] Dana Minbaeva,Torben Pedersen,Ingmar Bj rkman,Carl F. Fey,Hyeon Jeong Park.MNCKnowledge Transfer,Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity,and HRM [J].Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies,Vol.34,No.6,2003:586-599
    [15] Daniel Hoechle. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectionaldependence [J].Stata Journal,Vol.7-3,2007:281-312
    [16] Danny Quah.Technology dissemination and economic growth [J].LSE Working Paper,2001a
    [17] Danny Quah.Technology dissemination and economic growth:some lessons for the neweconomy [J].Published by Centre for Economic Performance,London School of Economicsand Political Science.2001b
    [18] David C. Mowery,Joanne E. Oxley.Inward technology transfer and competitiveness:therole of national innovation systems [J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,19,1995:67-93
    [19] David T. Coe,Elhanan Helpman.International R&D spillovers [J].European EconomicReview,39(1995):859-887
    [20] David T. Coe,Elhanan Helpman,Alexander W. Hoffmaister.North-South R&D spillovers[J].The Economic Journal,VOL.107,No.440(Jan.,1997):134-149
    [21] David T. Coe,Elhanan Helpman,Alexander W. Hoffmaister.International R&D spilloversand institutions [J].IMF Working Paper,2008/104
    [22] David J. Teece.Technology transfer by multinational firms:the resource cost of transferringtechnological know-how [J].The Economic Journal,87(June1977):242-261
    [23] Elhanan Helpman.Endogenous macroeconomic growth theory.NBER Working papers series,No.3869,October1991
    [24] Frank Barry,Holger G rg,Andrew McDowell.Outward FDI and the investmentdevelopment path of a late-indusrialising economy:evidence from Ireland. Department ofEconomics,Dublin University,Working Paper Series,2001/08
    [25] Frank R. Lichtenberg,Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie.International R&D Spillovers:a re-examination [J].NBER Working Paper5668,1996
    [26] Frank R. Lichtenberg,Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie.International R&D spillovers:a comment[J].European Economic Review,42(1998):1483-1491
    [27] Frank R. Lichtenberg,Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie.Does foreign direct investmenttransfer technology across booders?[J] The Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.83,No.3(Aug.,2001):490-497
    [28] Frans A. J. Van den Bosch,Henk W. Volberda,Michiel de Boer. Coevolution of firmabsorptive capacity and knowledge environment:organization forms and combinativecapabilities [J].Organization Science,Vol.10,No.5,Sep.-Oct.,1999:551-568
    [29] Frans A. J. Van den Bosch,Raymond Van Wijk,Henk W. Volberda.Absorptive Capacity:antecedents,models and outcomes [J].Report series of Erasmus Research Institute ofManagement,2003
    [30] Fredrik Sj holm.International transfer of knowledge:the role of international trade andgeographic proximity [J].Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv132,1996:97-115
    [31] Gene M. Grossman,Elhanan Helpman.Innovation and growth in the global economy
    [M].Cambridge,Massachusetts and London:MIT Press,1991
    [32] Georges Siotis.Foreign direct investment strategies and firms’ capacities [J].Journal ofEconomics and Management Strategy,Vol.8,1999:251-270
    [33] Girma S.,K. Wakelin.Regional underdevelopment:Is FDI the solution? A semi-parameteranalysis [J].GEP Research Paper2001/11,University of Nottingham,U.K.
    [34] Globermann S.,A. Kokko,F. Sj holm.International technology diffusion:Evidence fromSwedish patent data [J].Kyklos53,2000:17-38
    [35] Hans-Jürgen Engelbrecht.International R&D spillovers,human capital and productivity inOECD economies:an empirical investigation. European Economic Review,41(1997):1479-1488
    [36] Haskel J.,S. Pereira,M. Slaughter,Does inward foreign direct investment boost theproductivity of domestic firms?[J] Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute,August2001
    [37] Hideki Yamawaki.International competitiveness and the choice of entry mode:Japanesemultinationals in US and European manufacturing industries [M].A CEPR Workshop,Oxford.November1993,28p
    [38] Homin Chen,Tain-Jy Chen.Network linkages and location choice in foreign directinvestment [J].Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.29,No.3,1998:445-467
    [39] J. Benson Durham.Absorptive capacity and the effects of foreign direct investment andequity foreign portfolio investment on economic growth [J].European Economic Review,48,2004:285-306
    [40] Jaeho Lee,Jim Slater.Dynamic capabilities,entrepreneurial rent-seeking and the investmentdevelopment path:the case of Samsung [J].Journal of International Management,13(2007):241-257
    [41] James Feyrer.Convergence by parts [J].Working paper,Dartmouth College,Hanover,December2001
    [42] James G. March.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J].OrganizationScience,Vol.2,No.1,Special issue: organizational learning:papers in honor of (and by)James G. March(1991):71-87
    [43] James H. Love.Technology sourcing verces technology exploitation:an analysis of USforeign direct investment flows.Applied Economics,2003,35:1667-1678
    [44] Jianwen Liao,Harold Welsch,Michael Stoica.Organizational absorptive capacity andresponsiveness: an empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs [J].EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice,Vol.28,Issue1,2003:63-86
    [45] Jeffrey I. Bernstein,Pierre Mohnen.International R&D spillovers between U.S. and JapaneseR&D intensive sectors.Journal of International Economics,44(1998):315-338
    [46] John Cantwell,Odile Janne.Technological globalization and innovation centres:the role oftechnological leadership and location hierarchy [J].Research Policy,Vol.28,1999:119-144
    [47] Jone Child,Suzana B. Rodrigues.The internationalization of Chinese firms:a case fortheoretical extention?[J].Management and Organization Review,1:3,2005:381-410
    [48] John H. Dunning.Explaining the international direct investment position of countries:towards a dynamic or development approach [J].Weltwirtschaftliches Archive,Vol.117,1981:30-64
    [49] John H. Dunning.Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism[J].Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.26,No.3,1995:461-491
    [50] Jonathan Eaton,Samuel Kortum.Trade in ideas:patenting and productivity in theOECD.NBER Working paper series,NO.5049,March1995
    [51] Jonathan Eaton,Samuel Kortum.Trade in ideas:patenting and productivity in the OECD[J].Journal of International Economics40,1996:251-278
    [52] Jonathan Eaton&Samuel Kortum. International technology diffusion: theory andmeasurement. International Economic Review, Vol.40, NO.3,1999:537-570
    [53] Jonathan Eaton,Samuel Kortum.Trade in capital goods [J].European Economic Review45(7),2001(a);1195-1235
    [54] Jonathan Eaton,Samuel Kortum.Technology,geography,and trade [M].Mimeo,BostonUniversity,May,2001(b)
    [55] Jürgen Bitzer,Monika Kerekes.Does foreign direct investment transfer technology acrossborders? New evidence.Economics Letters,100(2008):355-358
    [56] Kevin G. Cai.Outward foreign direct investment:a novel dimension of China's integrationinto the regional and global economy [J].The China quarterly,No.160,1999:856--880
    [57] Kokko Ari.Foreign direct investment,host country characteristics,and spillovers
    [M].EFI/The Economic Research Institute,Stockholm School of Economics,1992,216p
    [58] Lai Mingyong,Peng Shuijun,Bao Qun.Technology spillovers,absorptive capacity andeconomic growth [J].China Economic Review,17,2006:300-320
    [59] Lars Wiethaus.Absorptive capacity and connectedness:why competing firms also adoptidentical R&D approaches [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2005(23):467-481
    [60] Lee Branstetter.Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidencefrom Japan’s FDI in the United States [J].NBER Working Paper,NO.8015,2001
    [61] Linsu Kim. Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building incatching-up at Hyundai Motor [J].Organizational Science,9,1998:506-521
    [62] Louis T. Weels,Jr..Third World Multinationals-The Rise of Foreign Investment fromDeveloping Countries [M].The MIT Press Cambridge, Massacusetts London,England,1983
    [63] Maria Luisa Mancusi,Università Bocconi,Milan.International spillovers and absorptivecapacity:a cross-country, cross sector analysis based on European patents and citations[J].Journal of International Economics, Vol.76,Issue2,2008:155-165
    [64] Mark Yaolin Wang. The motivations behind China's government-initiated industrialinvestment overseas [J].Pacific Affairs,Vol.75,No.2,2002:187-206
    [65] Michael Polanyi.Personal knowledge:towards a post-critical philosophy.University ofChicago Press,Chicago IL,1958
    [66] Morton I. Kamien,Israel Zang.Meet me halfway:research joint ventures and absorptivecapacity [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2000(18):995-1012
    [67] Moses Abramowitz.Catching up,forgoing ahead,and falling behind [J].Journal ofEconomic History,Volume46,Issue2,1986:385-406
    [68] Nigel Driffield,James H. Love.Foreign direct investment,technology sourcing and reversespillovers [J].The Manchester School,Vol.71,No.6,Dec.2003:659-672
    [69] Paul A. David,Aahok Desai,Morris Teubal.Knowledge,property,and the systems dynamicsof technological change [J].Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference onDevelopment Economics,1992:215-248
    [70] Paul Almeida.Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in theU.S. semiconductor industry [J].Strategic Management Journal,Vol.17,Winter specialissue,1996:155-165
    [71] Paul Krugman.The myth of Asia’s miracle [J].Foreign Affairs,73(6),1994:62-78
    [72] Paul M. Romer.Increasing returns and long-run growth [J].Journal of Political Economy,94(5),1986:1002-1037
    [73] Paul M. Romer.Endogenous technological change.Journal of Political Economy,98(5,part2),1990:S71-S102
    [74] Paul M. Romer.Two strategies for economic development:using ideas and producingideas.Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics,1992:63-91
    [75] Peter J. Buckley,L. Jeremy Clegg, Adam R. Cross.The determinants of Chinese outwardforeign direct investment [J].Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.38,No.4,International Expansion of Emerging Market Business,2007:499-518
    [76] Peter J. Lane,Michael Lubatkin.Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizationallearning [J].Strategic Management Journal,Vol.19,1998:461-477
    [77] Peter J. Lane,Balaji R. Koka,Seemantini Pathak.The reification of absorptive capacity:a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct [J].Academy of Management Review,Vol.31,No.4,2006:833-863
    [78] Ping Deng.Investing for strategic resources and its rationale:the case of outward FDI fromChinese companies [J].Business Horizons,2007(50):71-81
    [79] Rachel Griffith,Stephen Redding,John Van Reenen.R&D and absorptive capacity:theoryand empirical evidence [J].The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,Vol.105,No.1,2003:99-108
    [80] Ravi Ramamurti.What have we learned about emerging-market MNEs? Insights from amulti-country research project [J].For presentation at the conference on “EmergingMultinationals:Outward FDI from Emerging and Developing Economies”,2008
    [81] Reinhilde Veugelers. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing[J].Research Policy,26,1997:303-315
    [82] René Belderbos.Entry mode,organizational learning,and R&D in foreign affiliates:evidence from Japanese firms,Strategic management journal [J],Vol.24,No.3,2003:235—259
    [83] Richard E. Caves.International trade, international investment,and imperfect markets
    [M].International Finance Section,Princeton University,1974,38p
    [84] Robert D. Pearce.Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness:globalized approachesto generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises(MNEs)[J].Research Policy,Vol.28,1999:157-178
    [85] Robert E. Lucas.On the mechanics of economic development [J].Journal of MonetaryEconomics,22(1),1988:3-42
    [86] Rod Falvey,Neil Foster,David Greenaway.Relative backwardness,absorptive capacity andknowledge spillovers [J].Economic Letters,97,2007:230-234
    [87] Roger van Hosel.New multinational enterprises from Korea and Taiwan:beyond export-ledgrowth [J],New York, Routledge:227-244
    [88] Sanjaya Lall.The new multinationals: the spread of third world enterprises [M].Wiley/IRMSeries on Multinationals,Chichester,1983
    [89] Shaker A. Zahra,Gerard George.Absorptive capacity:A review,reconceptualization,andextension [J].The Academy of Management Review,Vol.27,No.2,2002:185-203
    [90] Sharon F. Matusik,Michael B. Heeley.Absorptive capacity in the software industry:identifying dimensions that affect knowledge and knowledge creation activities [J].Journalof Management,31,2005:549-572
    [91] Shige Makino,Andrew Delios.Local knowledge transfer and performance:implications foralliance formation in Asia [J].Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.27,No.5,Global perspectives on cooperative strategies,1996:905-927
    [92] Shige Makino,Chung-Ming Lau,Rhy-song Yeh.Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking:implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialisedeconomies [J].Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.33,No.3,2002:403-421
    [93] Tamim Bayoumi,David T. Coe,Elhanan Helpman.R&D spillovers and global growth[J].Journal of International Economics,47(1999):399-428
    [94] Tony S. Frost.The geographic source of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations [J].StrategicManagement Journal,22(2),2001:101-123
    [95] Trade,foreign direct investment,and international technology transfer:a survey [R].WorldBank Research Observer,Vol.17,No.2,2002
    [96] Weijian Shan,Jaeyong Song.Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technologicaladvantage:evidence from the biotechnology industry [J].Journal of International BusinessStudies,Vol.28,No.2,1997:267-284
    [97] Wenpin Tsai.Effects of network position and absorptive capacity [J].The Academy ofManagement Journal,Vol.44,No.5,2001:996-1004
    [98] Wesley M. Cohen,Daniel A. Levinthal.Innovation and learning:The two faces of R&D[J].The Economic Journal,Vol.99,No.397,1989:569-596
    [99] Wesley M. Cohen,Daniel A. Levinthal.Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learningand innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.35,No.1,1990:128-152
    [100] Wolfgang Keller.Absorptive capacity:on the creation and acquisition of technology indevelopment [J].Journal of Developmental Economics,49,1996:199-210
    [101] Wolfgang Keller.International technology diffusion [J].NBER Working Paper8573,2001
    [102] Wolfgang Keller.Are international R&D spillovers trade related? Analyzing spilloversamong randomly matched trade partners [J].European Economic Review42,1998:1469-1481
    [103] Xiaohui Liu,Trevor Buck,Chang Shu.Chinese economic development,the next stage:outward FDI? International Business Review,14(2005):97-115
    [104] Xielin Liu,R. Steven White.The relative contributions of foreign technology and domesticinputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries [J].Technovation,17,1997:119-125
    [105] Yuko Kinoshita.R&D and technology spillover via FDI:Innovation and absorptive capacity[J].Working Paper No.369of William Davidson Institute at the University of MichiganBusiness School,October2000
    [106] Zvi Griliches.Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector, inJohn W. Kendrick&Beatrice N. Vaccara,1980."New Developments in ProductivityMeasurement",NBER Books,National Bureau of Economic Research,Inc,numberkend80-1
    [1]白洁.对外直接投资的逆向技术溢出效应——对中国全要素生产率的经验影响[J].世界经济研究,2009(8):65-69
    [2]白洁.中国对外直接投资的技术进步效应研究[D]:[博士学位论文].武汉:华中科技大学.2009:51-52
    [3]曹方,刘果.跨国公司对外直接投资进入模式选择及启示[J].商场现代化,2008年2月下旬刊
    [4]曹菲菲,范冰清.影响企业知识吸收能力因素分析[J].陕西综合经济,2006(4):45-46
    [5]曹吉云.我国总量生产函数与技术进步贡献率[J].数量经济技术研究,2007(11):37-46
    [6]岑杰,陈洋.我国FDI吸收能力的实证分析[J].商业文化,2008(9):114
    [7]陈波,荣飞琼.中国对外直接投资的战略选择[J].统计研究,第25卷第8期,2008:101-102
    [8]陈达,李自杰.中国企业对外直接投资的研究与展望[J].科学决策,2010(8):78-87
    [9]陈建南.发展中国家对外直接投资理论评述[J].经济学动态,2001(2):65-67
    [10]陈志涓.中国对外直接投资的现状及战略研究[J].科技经济市场,2007(12):100-101
    [11]崔家玉.中国对外直接投资的动因[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),第9卷,第3期,2010:12-14
    [12]崔志,于渤,郝生宾.企业知识吸收能力对竞争优势影响的实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2007(11):29-34
    [13]崔志,于渤,崔崑.企业知识吸收能力影响因素的实证研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1):127-132
    [14]丁祥生.发展中国家跨国公司对外直接投资的动因研究[J].中国经贸导刊,2011(15):80-81
    [15]杜群羊.R&D全球化、反向外溢与技术获取型FDI[J].国际贸易问题,2006(12):88-91
    [16]杜群阳,朱勤.中国企业技术获取型海外直接投资理论与实践[J].国际贸易问题,2004(11):66-69
    [17]杜晓君,白汶松,刘赫.中国企业对外直接投资绩效实证研究[J].财会通讯,2010(6)下:73-76
    [18]冯鹏程,仲鑫.中国对外直接投资特点及趋势展望[J].理论前沿,2009(10):18-20
    [19]傅劲锋,张运鹏.中国跨国公司对外直接投资动机和策略分析[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(1):50-55
    [20]龚艳萍,郭凤华.对外直接投资对产业技术进步的影响[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2009(3):379-384
    [21]龚艳萍,郭凤华.中国对外直接投资对技术进步的实证研究[J].现代商贸工业,2008(12):130-131
    [22]顾列铭.发展中国家跨国公司崛起[J].资本市场,2006(12):70-71
    [23]郭娜,王秋华.发展中国家对外直接投资理论及对我国的启示[J].技术与创新管理,2009(6):756-758
    [24]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979-2004[J].经济研究,2005(6):51-60
    [25]郝静,张宗斌.中国走向对外直接投资大国的战略路径[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),第52卷第1期,2007:137-141
    [26]韩薪雨.跨国公司对外直接投资理论探析[J].现代经济信息,2008(5):53-54
    [27]何骏.中国企业对外直接投资的动力研究[J].财经理论与实践,2008(4):41-44
    [28]黄静波,张安民.中国对外直接投资主要动因类型的实证研究[J].国际经贸探索,第25卷第7期,2009:4-10
    [29]黄晓喆.中国对外直接投资的特变与推进措施[J].南都学坛(人文社会科学学报),第30卷,第3期,2010:132-134
    [30]黄玉霞.中国对外直接投资的特征及原因探析[J].武汉商业服务学院学报,第25卷第2期,2011:14-19
    [31]蒋兰陵.跨国并购——中国对外直接投资新的实现途径[J].商业研究,2004(17):62-63
    [32]蒋舒婷.中国企业的队伍直接投资[J].经济导刊,2010(10):42-43
    [33]赖明勇,包群,阳小晓.我国外商直接投资吸收能力研究[J].南开经济研究,2002(3):45-50
    [34]赖明勇,袁媛.R&D、国际技术外溢及人力资本一个经验研究[J].科研管理,2005(4):62-67
    [35]李宾,曾志雄.中国全要素生产率变动的再测算:1978——2007年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(3)
    [36]李翀.发展中国家学习型对外直接投资[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2007(6):4-7
    [37]李琮.中国跨国公司的发展、问题与走势[J].北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003(12):14-18
    [38]李敬,冉光和,万丽娟.发展中国家企业对外直接投资的总和动因分析[J].新疆社会科学,2007(4):31-34
    [39]李莉.关于中国对外直接投资的战略思考[J].河北经贸大学学报(综合版),第6卷第4期,2006:62-64
    [40]李平.国际技术扩散对发展中国家技术进步的影响:机制、效果和对策分析[M].北京:三联书店,2007:296-376
    [41]李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易、R&D溢出和生产率增长[J].经济研究,2006(2):31-43
    [42]李有.人力资本、吸收能力与进口贸易的技术溢出效应[J].科技管理研究,2008(5):26-28
    [43]林谧.中国大陆对外直接投资与跨国企业发展状况的实证分析:1990-2002年[J].中共福建省党委校学报,2004(8):59-62
    [44]刘宏,汪段泳.中国对外直接投资现状与特点研究:2008-2009[J].国际经贸探索,第26卷第12期,2010:63-68
    [45]刘凯敏,朱钟棣.我国对外直接投资与技术进步关系的实证研究[J].亚太经济,2007(1):98-101转93页
    [46]刘璐.知识吸收能力研究评述与展望[J].图书情报工作,2010(18):99-102转43页
    [47]刘璐,杨蕙馨.中国企业吸收能力影响因素与作用的探索性研究[J].产业经济评论,2008(2):68-90
    [48]刘明霞,王学军.中国对外直接投资的逆向技术溢出效应研究[J].世界经济研究,2009(9):57-62
    [49]刘明霞.中国对外直接投资的逆向技术溢出效应[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2010(3):16-21
    [50]刘伟全.我国对外直接投资国内技术进步效应的实证研究[J].当代财经,2010(5):101-106
    [51]刘阳春.中国企业对外直接投资的特征研究[J].经济与管理研究,2008(11):55-59
    [52]罗长远,曾繁华.外国直接投资溢出效应的文献综述[J].经济评论,2008(2):133-137
    [53]茅宁莹.企业知识吸收能力的分析框架与发展方向探析[J].现代管理科学,2005(9):45-47
    [54]苗洪亮.中国企业对外直接投资的动因及国内政策环境分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2010(5):31-32
    [55]聂名华.发展中国家对外直接投资理论述评[J].经济学动态,2000(3):67-69
    [56]裴长洪,樊瑛.中国企业对外直接投资的国家特定优势[J].中国工业经济,2010(7):45-54
    [57]秦姗.联想:闯过险滩[J].中国企业家,2011(18):61-63
    [58]茹玉骢.技术寻求型对外直接投资及其对母国经济的影响[J].经济评论,2004(2):109-112转123页
    [59]邵学言,吴琼.我国实施“走出去”战略的必要性和政策措施[J].价值工程,2006(5):13-15
    [60]申秀清.中国企业对外直接投资路径选择[J].经济论坛,2010(12):28-30
    [61]盛亚,单航英.中国企业跨国研发的策略研究[J].甘肃社会科学,2006(1):222-225
    [62]舒鹏.浅析当代发展中国家的对外直接投资[J].国际贸易问题,2004(8):53-56
    [63]苏辉.对中国对外直接投资战略的理论思考[J].商场现代化,2008年11月上旬刊:228-229
    [64]孙辉,夏鹏.论发展中国家对外直接投资理论对我国公司的指导意义[J].沿海公司与科技,2007(11):10-12
    [65]孙琳琳,任若恩.中国资本投入和全要素生产率的估算[J].世界经济,2005(12):3-13
    [66]唐保庆,贸易结构、吸收能力与国际R&D溢出效应[J],国际贸易问题,2010(2):91-97
    [67]陶凌云.发展中国家对外直接投资新理论[J].江南社会学院学报,2003(4):23-26
    [68]陶涛,麻志明.中国企业对外直接投资的动因分析[J].改革与战略,2009(2):152-155
    [69]田艳曦.评联想的发展方向和战略规划[J].甘肃农业,2005(8):87
    [70]田耘,申婷婷.跨国公司对外直接投资动机理论的文献综述[J].经济论坛,2007(21):72-73
    [71]万长明.发展中国家对外直接投资理论及对中国的启示[J].当代经济,2009年5月(上):150-152
    [72]王丹,刘立秋.投资发展路径理论——中国的实证分析[J].中国集体经济,2007(8):56-57
    [73]王海.中国企业海外并购经济后果研究[J].管理世界,2007(2):94-106转119页
    [74]王立生,胡隆基.吸收能力及其在跨国公司子公司知识获取过程中的作用分析[J].科技管理研究,2007(5):237-239转245页
    [75]汪芹.中国企业跨国经营存在的问题及对策[J].国际经济合作,2002(2):13-16
    [76]王英,刘思峰.中国ODI反向技术外溢效应的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2008(2):294-298
    [77]王玉宝.中国对外直接投资的策略选择[J].中国国情国力,2010(11):27-28
    [78]王卓,胡日东.引进外资、对外直接投资之促进技术进步效应的比较与有关国家经验的借鉴[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(2):26-31
    [79]魏浩.中国对外直接投资战略及相关问题[J].国际经济合作,2008(6):4-8
    [80]韦瑞.基于知识探索视角的中国企业逆向对外直接投资分析[J].中国集体经济,2010年第10期下:70-71
    [81]沃尔特·恩德斯.《应用计量经济学:时间序列分析》中译本[M].高等教育出版社,2006
    [82]伍德里奇.《计量经济学导论》中译本[M].中国人民大学出版社,2003:216-220
    [83]吴晓云,邓竹箐.中国跨国公司“全球导向——渐进式”国际经营战略思考[J].财经论丛,2008(3)
    [84]冼国明,杨锐.技术累积、竞争策略与发展中国家对外直接投资[J].经济研究,1998(11):56-63
    [85]肖光顺.对外直接投资与企业竞争力研究[D]:[博士学位论文].福建师范大学,2004:132-133
    [86]肖立秋,许晶.论发展中国家对外直接投资理论对我国企业实施“走出去”战略的借鉴意义[J].特区经济,2010年9月:220-222
    [87]徐金发,林枫.企业吸收能力:内涵、构成及测量分析[J].情报杂志,2009(7):118-121
    [88]徐金发,林枫.国外吸收能力模型研究进展[J].科技进步与对策,2004(7):153-156
    [89]阎大颖,洪俊杰,任兵.中国企业对外直接投资的决定因素:基于制度视角的经验分析[J].南开管理评论,2009年第12卷第6期:135-142
    [90]阎海峰.中国企业对外直接投资行为分析[J].世界经济研究,2009(7):50-56
    [91]杨杰,祝波.发展中国家对外直接投资理论的形成与演进[J].上海经济研究,2007(9):19-24
    [92]杨清.中国跨国公司成长点分析[J].当代财经,2005(10):67-71
    [93]杨纬球.中国对外直接投资决定因素实证分析[J].现代商贸工业,2011(7):110-111
    [94]姚利民,孙春媛.中国逆向型FDI决定因素的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2007(4):81-86转91页
    [95]叶广宇,姚化伟,黄怡芳.中国跨国公司海外经营的母国支持分析[J].改革与战略,2009(2):46-47转93页
    [96]叶华光.中国对外直接投资理论的扩展与战略调整[J].经济述评,2009年第2期上:84-89
    [97]衣长军.中国与美日对外直接投资战略动因国际比较[J].宏观经济研究,2010(4):63-67
    [98]尹冰.中国企业的对外直接投资与技术进步[J].社会科学家,2003(9):45-48转55页
    [99]余爱云.中国企业对外直接投资的策略探析[J].特区经济,2010(8):234-235
    [100]郁晓耕,魏浩.发展中国家对外直接投资理论综述[J].经济经纬,2006(5):47-50
    [101]曾剑云.东道国技术外溢、吸收能力与无优势企业对外直接投资[D]:[博士学位论文].华中科技大学,2008:150
    [102]张道武.对外直接投资对中国经济增长影响实证研究新进展综述[J].金卡工程,2011(1):313
    [103]张骁,杨忠.中国企业跨国经营的模式借鉴——来自日韩经验的启示[J].当代财经,2005(8):73-77
    [104]张建东.中国企业对外投资中的若干问题及对策分析[J].商业研究,2003(7):64-66
    [105]张军,施少华.中国经济全要素生产率变动:1952-1998[J].世界经济文汇,2003(2):17-24
    [106]张军,章元.对中国资本存量K的再估计[J].经济研究,2003(7):35-43
    [107]张西林.对外直接投资的决定因素:中国的经验研究[J].世界经济情况,2009(12):13-18
    [108]张远鹏,杨勇.中国对外直接投资区位选择的影响因素分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2010(6):34-46
    [109]赵放.中国对外直接投资诱因、意图及制约因素之辨析[J].社会科学战线,2009(3):78-84
    [110]赵伟,古广东,何元庆.外向FDI与中国技术进步:机理分析与尝试性实证[J].管理世界,2006(7):53-60
    [111]郑磊.中国对外直接投资-企业获取竞争优势研究[D]:[博士学位论文].南开大学国际经济研究所,2009:115-118
    [112]邹玉娟,陈漓高.我国对外直接投资与技术提升的实证研究[J].世界经济研究,2008(5):70-77

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700