新企业社会网络构建的效应机制分析
|
摘要
社会网络在推动新企业成长及绩效改善中的关键作用促使创业者们越来越重视社会网络构建活动，但不同的新企业在社会网络构建过程及结果上呈现出差异，主要体现在“如何构建网络”以及“构建怎样的网络”两方面。这些蕴含差异的过程特征如何影响新企业初期绩效？基于此，本研究从过程视角出发聚焦新企业组织层面的社会网络构建活动，情境化借用效率和效果维度刻画该过程的本质特征，以此为基础深入探讨新企业社会网络构建活动如何影响其初期绩效，并进而挖掘二者关系的权变机制及边界条件，以期丰富现有研究、指导创业实践。本文利用143份针对新创企业创业者的有效问卷，采用因子分析、层级回归分析和调节回归分析等方法，对相关假设进行了实证检验。
通过对理论假设的实证检验，本研究得出以下四点主要发现和结论：
第一，新企业组织层面的社会网络构建及其主要特征是影响其初期绩效和成长的重要因素。网络构建活动最重要的意义是促进新企业获取外部资源以突破资源局限，满足生存和成长所需的资源。这也是效率和效果维度下的网络构建本质特征影响新企业初期绩效的核心路径。网络构建效果是新企业社会网络规模、强关联数量及优质关联数量等多项指标的综合，对新企业初期绩效有显著正向影响。网络构建效率主要由构建速度和构建投入两部分构成，二者在内涵及影响路径上的差异导致网络构建效率对新企业初期绩效产生不同方向的两种影响：网络构建速度所代表的效率（速度越快，效率越高）正向影响新企业初期绩效，而网络构建投入所代表的效率（投入越多，效率越低）负向影响新企业初期绩效，即对网络构建活动投入越多的新企业，其初期绩效越好。
第二，新企业社会网络构建效率和效果在效应机制上存在重要差异。效率和效果兼具是新企业网络构建中较为理想的状态，但是在现实中很难达到，这就要求新企业在网络构建中做出选择性决策，实现有限资源的合理配置。从纵向对比来看，与学步期新企业相比，婴儿期新企业的网络构建活动对其初期绩效的影响更显著，即社会网络构建活动对新企业成长的效应随其成长阶段的延伸而变弱，这尤其体现在网络构建效果效应的变化上。从横向对比来看，对于婴儿期新企业而言，网络构建效果对初期绩效的影响比网络构建效率更显著，而对学步期新企业来说，网络构建效率对初期绩效的影响比网络构建效果更显著。
第三，新企业所处的信任氛围正向调节新企业网络构建活动与初期绩效的关系。新企业所处环境中的信任氛围是组织间的信任基础，良好的信任氛围能够促使新企业社会网络构建活动更好地发挥对初期绩效的影响能力，尤其是网络构建效果的推动作用。良好的信任氛围增进新企业与其社会网络中关联组织的互动，减少其面临的难以承受的机会主义行为及合作风险，促进合作组织之间的信任积累，推动互惠性合作顺利开展，从一般关联向强关联的转化相对容易，而地位较高、资源获取能力较强的优质关联对新企业的疑虑及防范意识也会随之降低，有利于新企业整合外部资源，促进生存与发展。
第四，代表市场环境的地区市场化程度调节新企业网络构建活动与初期绩效的关系，其中地区产品市场和要素市场发育程度对网络构建投入和效果效应机制的调节作用尤为显著。市场化程度的不断提高是经济转型期中国情境下市场环境的重要特点，该因素负向调节新企业社会网络构建对其初期绩效的推动作用，主要是削弱社会网络的非市场路径影响力，但同时，在特殊的要素市场中社会网络的市场路径影响力会因为市场环境的进一步规范化而得到改善和提高。因此，转型时期中国情境下的新企业应当根据市场环境的变化调整其社会网络结构从而改善网络产生效应的影响路径，降低对社会网络非市场路径支持的依赖，充分发挥其通过市场路径产生的积极作用。
本研究的创新点和理论价值主要体现在以下三个方面：
第一，情境化引入效率和效果视角描述新企业网络构建活动，有利于更系统、概括地描述该过程的本质特征。鉴于以往研究或忽略新企业网络构建过程，或只是以零散、片面的指标对该过程进行单一维度的简单描述，本研究情境化借用效率和效果视角系统地描述新企业网络构建过程的本质特征。其中效率侧重描述“新企业如何构建社会网络”，强调“用正确的方式构建网络”，具体体现于新企业网络构建速度和投入，而效果侧重描述“新企业构建起怎样的社会网络”，强调“构建正确的社会网络”，具体体现于所构建网络的规模、网络中强关联、优质关联的数量等多个指标。
第二，从效率和效果视角解释新企业网络构建活动的效应机制并探讨其边界条件，有力地丰富、深化了有关创业网络与新企业成长关系的探讨。本研究借用效率和效果视角分别描述新企业组织层面网络构建过程的不同特征并以此为基础分别探讨网络构建效率和效果特征在效应机制上存在的异同，不仅弥补了以往研究过分关注创业者个体层面社会网络、忽略过程的不足，而且从更深层次挖掘了社会网络对新企业成长及绩效的影响，而分析成长阶段、信任氛围和地区市场化程度等新企业内外部因素如何作用于其网络构建效应机制，则从三个具有特殊性的角度进一步明晰了该效应机制的边界条件，丰富了现有的创业网络研究。
第三，在探讨新企业社会网络构建效应机制的权变及边界条件时着重考虑地区市场化程度的调节作用，有利于推动中国情境下的创业研究。改革开放以来中国情境最主要的特点之一即为处于特殊的经济转型时期，在计划经济向市场经济转型的特殊时期，最突出的特点之一即在于市场环境的巨大变化，而市场环境的变化集中体现于市场化程度纵向上的巨大变化和横向上的地区不平衡。本研究从效率和效果视角阐释了地区市场化程度对新企业社会网络构建活动效应机制的调节作用，证明了经济转型时期中国情境下的新企业社会网络构建活动与外部市场环境紧密相关、积极匹配的关系，突出了特殊情境因素对研究问题的影响作用。
本论文共分六章，基本结构如下：第一章绪论部分阐述了研究背景、问题来源、主要研究内容和研究方法，并介绍了研究技术路线及论文写作框架。第二章文献综述部分对构成本研究理论基础的相关已有研究进行系统述评，主要梳理了社会网络、社会资本、创业网络相关的研究及其发现。第三章情境化界定、测度新企业社会网络效率和效果，重点以已有理论为基础进行系列假设推导，聚焦回答新企业社会网络构建效率和效果是否以及如何影响新企业绩效的核心问题。第四章介绍了本研究采用的研究方法，并详细描述了研究设计过程。第五章是实证分析部分，通过有效的实证统计分析检验本研究所提出的有关新企业社会网络构建效应机制的系列假设，并就假设检验结果展开深入探讨。第六章归纳出本研究的主要研究发现和研究结论，指出主要创新点，分析研究中存在的不足，并展望未来研究。
It is widely recognized by both theorists and practitioners that social networksplay a critical role in entrepreneurship as well as new firms’ growth. Thus,entrepreneurs are all actively involved in building and maintaining their socialnetworks at both individual and organizational levels. However, since different newfirms do vary in their social networking,“how to build” and “what to build” are twointeresting and intriguing questions to be answered in the process. In order to exploredifferences in new firms’ social networking and consequences of such differences,this research focuses on this special entrepreneurial activity at the organizational level,and portraits essential characteristics of this process by borrowing and contextualizingthe special perspectives of efficiency and effectiveness. With143valid questionnairesanswered by Chinese entrepreneurs, the research empirically examines how newfirms’ social networking influences their performance and further explorescontingencies and boundary conditions of this mechanism by considering themoderation of important environmental factors.
Four primary conclusions are drawn from this empirical study:
First, new firms’ social networking and its major characteristics exert significantinfluence on their performance and growth. Through efficient and effective socialnetworking, new firms, which are greatly limited by the liability of newness andsmallness, manage to assemble precious external resources that are essential to theirsurvival and growth. High networking efficiency implies that new firms are able toestablish their primary social networks at relatively lower cost and faster pace, whichmeans they can get ready with required resources when good opportunities come.High networking effectiveness implies that new firms’ organizational networksinclude relatively more ties, especially close ties with frequent interactions and tieswith higher status and richer resources.
Second, though closely related, social networking efficiency and effectivenessare different in influencing new firms’ performance. While the ideal state of socialnetworking is to achieve high efficiency and high effectiveness at the same time, new firms usually find it difficult to reach the ideal state and have to make a choicebetween the two. Vertical comparisons show that, social networking effectiveness iseven more influential in infant firms than in Go-Go firms, which means that the greatinfluence of social networking effectiveness on new firms’ performance is weakenedwith the progress of firms’ growth stage. Horizontal comparisons show that, amonginfant firms, social networking effectiveness is more influential than networkingefficiency, while among Go-Go firms, the former is less influential than the latter.Such differences enlighten new firms at different stages to make different choices intheir social networking.
Third, trust climate that new firms are situated in positively moderates therelationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance. Asfoundation of inter-organizational trust, favorable trust climate helps stimulate newfirms’ better performance with social networking and especially promote the positiveinfluence of networking effectiveness. Furthermore, Favorable trust climateaccelerates interactions between new firms and their networking partners, reducesopportunistic behaviors and cooperative risks, promotes trust accumulation amongcooperative organizations, motivates them to achieve win-win situation incooperation, and makes the transformation of common relation into close relationmore easily. At the same time, in better trust climate, partners with higher status andmore accesses to resources will reduce their doubts about new firms, which enablesthem to cooperate more closely and offer critical support more willingly.
Fourth, marketization, which best reflects local market environment, moderatesthe relationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance, amongwhich the development of local product market as well as local factor marketsignificantly moderates the influential mechanism of networking input andeffectiveness. The rapid progress of marketization is an essential characteristic ofChina’s transforming market environment. New firms’ social networking influencestheir performance through two different paths: the market path, which follows andworks with formal market rules, and the non-market path, which penetrates into andgoes against formal market mechanism. When local marketization negativelymoderates social networking’s influence on new firms’ performance, it mainly weakens influence from non-market path. On the contrary, the influence ofnetworking effectiveness from the market path is further strengthened by thedevelopment of local factor market. Thus, new firms in China’s transforming marketenvironment must reduce their dependence on social networks’ influence from thenon-market path and make best use of the positive influence from the market path byadjusting networking styles and networking structures.
The major contributions of this research to the study of entrepreneurial networksare concluded in the following three aspects:
First, while previous studies have largely ignored the process of new firms’social networking, or simply described it with scattered varibles and dimensions, thisstudy depicts and describes essential characteristics of new firms’ social networkingin a systematic and general way by borrowing and contextualizing the specialperspectives of efficiency and effectiveness. Networking efficiency focuses on hownew firms construct their social networks and places special emphasis on the rightmethods exhibited in input and speed, and networking effectiveness concentrates onwhat social networks new firms should build and attaches great importance on theright network, which is mainly exhibited in structure and content of the network.
Second, this research explores the relationship between new firms’ socialnetworking and their performance from the contextualized perspectives of efficiencyand effectiveness, and thus greatly enriches previous discussions about the linkbetween entrepreneurial networks and new firms’ growth. After contextualizing thetwo borrowed perspectives and portraying new firms’ social networking in a moresystematic way, this paper discusses and compares how networking efficiency andeffectiveness influence new firms’ performance differently. By doing so, it not onlymakes up for the neglect of organizational networks and networking process inprevious studies, but also offers a more in-depth understanding of the relationshipbetween entrepreneurial networks and new firms’ performance. Comparisons betweenthe two aspects as well as further discussions about the moderation of trust climateand maketization serve to clarify boundary conditions of the focused influentialmechanisms, which also pushes forward studies on entrepreneurial networks.
Third, this research discusses contingencies and boundary conditions of the relationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance byconsidering the moderation of China’s transforming market environment, whichgreatly promotes entrepreneurship studies in the special context. Since the reform andopening-up policy, China has been experiencing remarkable transformation fromplanning economy to market economy, and one of the most prominent characteristicsin China’ market environment is the rapid and eneven progress of marketization indifferent regions. From the perspectives of efficiency and effectiveness, the researchillustrates the moderation of regional marketization on the link between new firms’social networking and performance. Results show that, regional marketization,especially development of regional product market and regional factor marketsignificantly moderate the focused relationship. Such a bold and innovative attemptenriches entrepreneurship studies set in Chinese context and points out directions forfurther work.
This dissertation is divided into six chapters, and the basic structure is as follows:Chapter1briefly introduces research background, research questions, methods, aswell as theoretical framework of the current research. Chapter2reviews previousstudies related to social networks, entrepreneurial networks as well as efficiency andeffectiveness. Chapter3first contextualizes and defines new firms’ social networkingefficiency and effectiveness, and then presents a series of hypotheses on therelationship between new firms’ social networking and performance as well ascontigencies and boundary conditions of their link. Chapter4describes researchmethods employed in the current research, including research design, data collectionand analytical techniques. Chapter5first reports and explains the results of empricialanalyses, which tests hypotheses proposed in chapter3. Finally, the last chaptersummarizes major findings, draws conclusions of the research, pointes out possibleinnovation, and also points out directions of further studies by objectively analyzinglimitations of this research.
通过对理论假设的实证检验，本研究得出以下四点主要发现和结论：
第一，新企业组织层面的社会网络构建及其主要特征是影响其初期绩效和成长的重要因素。网络构建活动最重要的意义是促进新企业获取外部资源以突破资源局限，满足生存和成长所需的资源。这也是效率和效果维度下的网络构建本质特征影响新企业初期绩效的核心路径。网络构建效果是新企业社会网络规模、强关联数量及优质关联数量等多项指标的综合，对新企业初期绩效有显著正向影响。网络构建效率主要由构建速度和构建投入两部分构成，二者在内涵及影响路径上的差异导致网络构建效率对新企业初期绩效产生不同方向的两种影响：网络构建速度所代表的效率（速度越快，效率越高）正向影响新企业初期绩效，而网络构建投入所代表的效率（投入越多，效率越低）负向影响新企业初期绩效，即对网络构建活动投入越多的新企业，其初期绩效越好。
第二，新企业社会网络构建效率和效果在效应机制上存在重要差异。效率和效果兼具是新企业网络构建中较为理想的状态，但是在现实中很难达到，这就要求新企业在网络构建中做出选择性决策，实现有限资源的合理配置。从纵向对比来看，与学步期新企业相比，婴儿期新企业的网络构建活动对其初期绩效的影响更显著，即社会网络构建活动对新企业成长的效应随其成长阶段的延伸而变弱，这尤其体现在网络构建效果效应的变化上。从横向对比来看，对于婴儿期新企业而言，网络构建效果对初期绩效的影响比网络构建效率更显著，而对学步期新企业来说，网络构建效率对初期绩效的影响比网络构建效果更显著。
第三，新企业所处的信任氛围正向调节新企业网络构建活动与初期绩效的关系。新企业所处环境中的信任氛围是组织间的信任基础，良好的信任氛围能够促使新企业社会网络构建活动更好地发挥对初期绩效的影响能力，尤其是网络构建效果的推动作用。良好的信任氛围增进新企业与其社会网络中关联组织的互动，减少其面临的难以承受的机会主义行为及合作风险，促进合作组织之间的信任积累，推动互惠性合作顺利开展，从一般关联向强关联的转化相对容易，而地位较高、资源获取能力较强的优质关联对新企业的疑虑及防范意识也会随之降低，有利于新企业整合外部资源，促进生存与发展。
第四，代表市场环境的地区市场化程度调节新企业网络构建活动与初期绩效的关系，其中地区产品市场和要素市场发育程度对网络构建投入和效果效应机制的调节作用尤为显著。市场化程度的不断提高是经济转型期中国情境下市场环境的重要特点，该因素负向调节新企业社会网络构建对其初期绩效的推动作用，主要是削弱社会网络的非市场路径影响力，但同时，在特殊的要素市场中社会网络的市场路径影响力会因为市场环境的进一步规范化而得到改善和提高。因此，转型时期中国情境下的新企业应当根据市场环境的变化调整其社会网络结构从而改善网络产生效应的影响路径，降低对社会网络非市场路径支持的依赖，充分发挥其通过市场路径产生的积极作用。
本研究的创新点和理论价值主要体现在以下三个方面：
第一，情境化引入效率和效果视角描述新企业网络构建活动，有利于更系统、概括地描述该过程的本质特征。鉴于以往研究或忽略新企业网络构建过程，或只是以零散、片面的指标对该过程进行单一维度的简单描述，本研究情境化借用效率和效果视角系统地描述新企业网络构建过程的本质特征。其中效率侧重描述“新企业如何构建社会网络”，强调“用正确的方式构建网络”，具体体现于新企业网络构建速度和投入，而效果侧重描述“新企业构建起怎样的社会网络”，强调“构建正确的社会网络”，具体体现于所构建网络的规模、网络中强关联、优质关联的数量等多个指标。
第二，从效率和效果视角解释新企业网络构建活动的效应机制并探讨其边界条件，有力地丰富、深化了有关创业网络与新企业成长关系的探讨。本研究借用效率和效果视角分别描述新企业组织层面网络构建过程的不同特征并以此为基础分别探讨网络构建效率和效果特征在效应机制上存在的异同，不仅弥补了以往研究过分关注创业者个体层面社会网络、忽略过程的不足，而且从更深层次挖掘了社会网络对新企业成长及绩效的影响，而分析成长阶段、信任氛围和地区市场化程度等新企业内外部因素如何作用于其网络构建效应机制，则从三个具有特殊性的角度进一步明晰了该效应机制的边界条件，丰富了现有的创业网络研究。
第三，在探讨新企业社会网络构建效应机制的权变及边界条件时着重考虑地区市场化程度的调节作用，有利于推动中国情境下的创业研究。改革开放以来中国情境最主要的特点之一即为处于特殊的经济转型时期，在计划经济向市场经济转型的特殊时期，最突出的特点之一即在于市场环境的巨大变化，而市场环境的变化集中体现于市场化程度纵向上的巨大变化和横向上的地区不平衡。本研究从效率和效果视角阐释了地区市场化程度对新企业社会网络构建活动效应机制的调节作用，证明了经济转型时期中国情境下的新企业社会网络构建活动与外部市场环境紧密相关、积极匹配的关系，突出了特殊情境因素对研究问题的影响作用。
本论文共分六章，基本结构如下：第一章绪论部分阐述了研究背景、问题来源、主要研究内容和研究方法，并介绍了研究技术路线及论文写作框架。第二章文献综述部分对构成本研究理论基础的相关已有研究进行系统述评，主要梳理了社会网络、社会资本、创业网络相关的研究及其发现。第三章情境化界定、测度新企业社会网络效率和效果，重点以已有理论为基础进行系列假设推导，聚焦回答新企业社会网络构建效率和效果是否以及如何影响新企业绩效的核心问题。第四章介绍了本研究采用的研究方法，并详细描述了研究设计过程。第五章是实证分析部分，通过有效的实证统计分析检验本研究所提出的有关新企业社会网络构建效应机制的系列假设，并就假设检验结果展开深入探讨。第六章归纳出本研究的主要研究发现和研究结论，指出主要创新点，分析研究中存在的不足，并展望未来研究。
It is widely recognized by both theorists and practitioners that social networksplay a critical role in entrepreneurship as well as new firms’ growth. Thus,entrepreneurs are all actively involved in building and maintaining their socialnetworks at both individual and organizational levels. However, since different newfirms do vary in their social networking,“how to build” and “what to build” are twointeresting and intriguing questions to be answered in the process. In order to exploredifferences in new firms’ social networking and consequences of such differences,this research focuses on this special entrepreneurial activity at the organizational level,and portraits essential characteristics of this process by borrowing and contextualizingthe special perspectives of efficiency and effectiveness. With143valid questionnairesanswered by Chinese entrepreneurs, the research empirically examines how newfirms’ social networking influences their performance and further explorescontingencies and boundary conditions of this mechanism by considering themoderation of important environmental factors.
Four primary conclusions are drawn from this empirical study:
First, new firms’ social networking and its major characteristics exert significantinfluence on their performance and growth. Through efficient and effective socialnetworking, new firms, which are greatly limited by the liability of newness andsmallness, manage to assemble precious external resources that are essential to theirsurvival and growth. High networking efficiency implies that new firms are able toestablish their primary social networks at relatively lower cost and faster pace, whichmeans they can get ready with required resources when good opportunities come.High networking effectiveness implies that new firms’ organizational networksinclude relatively more ties, especially close ties with frequent interactions and tieswith higher status and richer resources.
Second, though closely related, social networking efficiency and effectivenessare different in influencing new firms’ performance. While the ideal state of socialnetworking is to achieve high efficiency and high effectiveness at the same time, new firms usually find it difficult to reach the ideal state and have to make a choicebetween the two. Vertical comparisons show that, social networking effectiveness iseven more influential in infant firms than in Go-Go firms, which means that the greatinfluence of social networking effectiveness on new firms’ performance is weakenedwith the progress of firms’ growth stage. Horizontal comparisons show that, amonginfant firms, social networking effectiveness is more influential than networkingefficiency, while among Go-Go firms, the former is less influential than the latter.Such differences enlighten new firms at different stages to make different choices intheir social networking.
Third, trust climate that new firms are situated in positively moderates therelationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance. Asfoundation of inter-organizational trust, favorable trust climate helps stimulate newfirms’ better performance with social networking and especially promote the positiveinfluence of networking effectiveness. Furthermore, Favorable trust climateaccelerates interactions between new firms and their networking partners, reducesopportunistic behaviors and cooperative risks, promotes trust accumulation amongcooperative organizations, motivates them to achieve win-win situation incooperation, and makes the transformation of common relation into close relationmore easily. At the same time, in better trust climate, partners with higher status andmore accesses to resources will reduce their doubts about new firms, which enablesthem to cooperate more closely and offer critical support more willingly.
Fourth, marketization, which best reflects local market environment, moderatesthe relationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance, amongwhich the development of local product market as well as local factor marketsignificantly moderates the influential mechanism of networking input andeffectiveness. The rapid progress of marketization is an essential characteristic ofChina’s transforming market environment. New firms’ social networking influencestheir performance through two different paths: the market path, which follows andworks with formal market rules, and the non-market path, which penetrates into andgoes against formal market mechanism. When local marketization negativelymoderates social networking’s influence on new firms’ performance, it mainly weakens influence from non-market path. On the contrary, the influence ofnetworking effectiveness from the market path is further strengthened by thedevelopment of local factor market. Thus, new firms in China’s transforming marketenvironment must reduce their dependence on social networks’ influence from thenon-market path and make best use of the positive influence from the market path byadjusting networking styles and networking structures.
The major contributions of this research to the study of entrepreneurial networksare concluded in the following three aspects:
First, while previous studies have largely ignored the process of new firms’social networking, or simply described it with scattered varibles and dimensions, thisstudy depicts and describes essential characteristics of new firms’ social networkingin a systematic and general way by borrowing and contextualizing the specialperspectives of efficiency and effectiveness. Networking efficiency focuses on hownew firms construct their social networks and places special emphasis on the rightmethods exhibited in input and speed, and networking effectiveness concentrates onwhat social networks new firms should build and attaches great importance on theright network, which is mainly exhibited in structure and content of the network.
Second, this research explores the relationship between new firms’ socialnetworking and their performance from the contextualized perspectives of efficiencyand effectiveness, and thus greatly enriches previous discussions about the linkbetween entrepreneurial networks and new firms’ growth. After contextualizing thetwo borrowed perspectives and portraying new firms’ social networking in a moresystematic way, this paper discusses and compares how networking efficiency andeffectiveness influence new firms’ performance differently. By doing so, it not onlymakes up for the neglect of organizational networks and networking process inprevious studies, but also offers a more in-depth understanding of the relationshipbetween entrepreneurial networks and new firms’ performance. Comparisons betweenthe two aspects as well as further discussions about the moderation of trust climateand maketization serve to clarify boundary conditions of the focused influentialmechanisms, which also pushes forward studies on entrepreneurial networks.
Third, this research discusses contingencies and boundary conditions of the relationship between new firms’ social networking and their performance byconsidering the moderation of China’s transforming market environment, whichgreatly promotes entrepreneurship studies in the special context. Since the reform andopening-up policy, China has been experiencing remarkable transformation fromplanning economy to market economy, and one of the most prominent characteristicsin China’ market environment is the rapid and eneven progress of marketization indifferent regions. From the perspectives of efficiency and effectiveness, the researchillustrates the moderation of regional marketization on the link between new firms’social networking and performance. Results show that, regional marketization,especially development of regional product market and regional factor marketsignificantly moderate the focused relationship. Such a bold and innovative attemptenriches entrepreneurship studies set in Chinese context and points out directions forfurther work.
This dissertation is divided into six chapters, and the basic structure is as follows:Chapter1briefly introduces research background, research questions, methods, aswell as theoretical framework of the current research. Chapter2reviews previousstudies related to social networks, entrepreneurial networks as well as efficiency andeffectiveness. Chapter3first contextualizes and defines new firms’ social networkingefficiency and effectiveness, and then presents a series of hypotheses on therelationship between new firms’ social networking and performance as well ascontigencies and boundary conditions of their link. Chapter4describes researchmethods employed in the current research, including research design, data collectionand analytical techniques. Chapter5first reports and explains the results of empricialanalyses, which tests hypotheses proposed in chapter3. Finally, the last chaptersummarizes major findings, draws conclusions of the research, pointes out possibleinnovation, and also points out directions of further studies by objectively analyzinglimitations of this research.
引文
[1]本研究受到国家自然基金委重点项目“新企业创业机理与成长模式研究”（70732004）、国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“创业团队的形成过程理性与绩效作用机制研究”（70902050）、教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“新企业生成过程中创业者关系网络利用方式的前置因素与绩效作用机制研究”
（09YJC630132）的支持。
[1]张慧玉，尹珏林.企业社会责任前移——小企业和新企业的社会角色.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(7):130-135.
[2]杨俊.社会资本、创业机会与新企业初期绩效——基于关键要素互动过程视角的实证研究:[博士学位论文].天津：南开大学，2008.
[3]张玉利，杨俊.创业研究经典文献述评.天津：南开大学出版社，2010.
[1] McClelland, D C. The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand,1961.
[2] Collins O, Moore D G, Unwalla, D. The enterprising man, bureau of business and economic research, GraduateSchool of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing,1967.
[3] McCleland D, Winter D G. Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press,1969.
[4] Liles P. Who are the entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics,1974,22:5~14.
[5] Brockhaus R H, Nord W R. An exploration of factors affecting the entrepreneurial decision: personalcharacteristics vs. environmental Conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management,1979.
[6] Komives J L. A preliminary study of the personal values of high technology entrepreneurs. In A. C. Cooperand J. L. Komives (Eds.), Technical Entrepreneurship: A Symposium. Milwaukee: Center for VentureManagement,1972,231-242.
[7] Hull D L, Bosley J J, Udell G G. Reviewing the heffalump: identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality
characteristics. Journal of Small Business Management,1980,18:11~18.
[1] Brockhaus R H. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:
509~520.
[2] Palich L E, Bagby D R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challengingconventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing,1995,10(6):425-438.
[3] Schumpeter J. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1934.
[4] Jennings D, Young D. An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measures of the productinnovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1990,15(1):53~66.
[5] Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:41~58.
[6] Liang Chyi-lyi, Dunn Paul. Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy? Relationship betweenentrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial Learning. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal,2008,14(1/2):51~73.
[7] Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality,1962,30(1):29~50.
[8] Cole A H. Definition of entrepreneurship. In: Komives J L, Karl A, eds. Bostrom Seminar in the Study ofEnterprise. Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1969.10~22.
[1] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy ofManagement Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[2] Zhang, Huiyu. Games in Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility.8th International Conference onService System and Service Management. Tianjin, China,2011.
[3] Gartner W B. Who is an entrepreneur? iIs the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business,1988,12
(4):1~22.
[4] Carland J W, Hoy Frank, Carland Jo Ann C. Who is an entreprneur? is a question worth asking. AmericanJournal of Small Business,1988,12(4):33~39.
[5] Low M B, MacMillan I C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future direction. Journal of Management,1988,14(2):139~161.
[1] Davidson P. The Entrepreneurial process as a matching problem. Proceedings of Academy of ManagementConference, Hawaii, U.S.A.,2005.
[1] Covin J G, Slevin D P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and Benign environments. StrategicManagement Journal,1989,10(1):75~87.
[2] Romanelli E, Environment and strategies of organization start-up: effect on early survival. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1989,34(3):369~387.
[3] Sandberg W, Hofer C W. Improving new venture performance: the role of strategy, industry structure, and theentrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing,1987,1:5~28.
[1] Aldrich H E, Fiol C M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of ManagementReview,1994,19(4):645~670.
[2] Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academyof Management Review,2002,27(3):414~431.
[3] Forbes D P. Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(5):623~640.
[4] Busenitz L, Barney J. Entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristic in strategicdecision-making. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9~30.
[5] Stevenson H H, Gumpert D E. The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review,1985,85(2):85~94.
[6] Stevenson H H, Jarillo J C. A perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. StrategicManagement Journal,1990,11(1):17~27.
[7] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of Embeddedness. American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[1] Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[2] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures,defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[4] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[5] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more) evidence ofembeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[6] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[7] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of ManagementReview,2000,25(1):217~226.
[3] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al., eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[4] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process:examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presented at the1999Academy ofManagement Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[5] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[6] Uzzi Brian. Social dtructure and vompetition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness.Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[7] Uzzi, Brian. Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks BenefitFirms Seeking Financing [J]. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4): p481-505.
[8] Larson, Andrea and Starr, Jennifer A. A Network Model of Organization Formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5-15.
[9] Hite, J. M. The Influence of the Early Firm Life Cycle on the Evolution of Entrepreneurial Dyadic NetworkTies [R]. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Paper also received Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice Best Conceptual Paper Award,1998.
[10] Hite, Julie M, and Hesterly, William S. The Evolution of Firm Networks: from Emergence to Early Growth ofthe Firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275–286.
[11] Greve, A, and Salaff, J. W. Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1-22.
[1] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and waysforward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[2] Van de Ven A, Poole M S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of ManagementReview,1995,20(3):510~540.
[3] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[4] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[1]费孝通.乡土中国.北京：人民出版社，2008年（初版于上海观察社，1948年）
[2] Drucker Peter F. The effective executive. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.,1966.
[1]樊景立，梁建，陈志俊.实证研究的设计与评价. In:陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1]林聚任.社会网络分析：理论、方法与应用.北京:北京师范大学出版社，2009
[1] Homans G C. The human group, New York:: Harcourt, Brace&Co.,1950.
[2] Barnes John A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations.1954,7(1):39~58, doi:10.1177/001872675400700102
[3] Barnes John A.. Social networks. Addison-Wesley Module Publications26. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley,1972.
[4] Bott Elizabeth. Family and social network.303Park Avenue South, New York: Humanities Press,1957.
[5]Mitchell J C. The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J C. eds. Social networks in
urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
[1] White Harrison C, Boorman S, Breiger R. Social structure from mutiple networks, I. blockmodels of roles andpositon. American Journal of Sociology,1976,81:732.
[2] White H C. Markets from networks: socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress,2002.
[1] Granovetter Mark S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(May):1360~1380.
[1]边燕杰.社会网络与求职过程.国外社会学.1999,4.
[2]边燕杰.找回强连带：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职.转引自.中国社会学（第一卷）.上海：上海人民出版社，2002：245.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[2] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[3] Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin,1965.
[1] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory and research for thesociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[1] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory and research for thesociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[2] Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press,1990.
[3] Putnam Robert D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The American Prospect,1993,
13(Spring):35~42.
[4] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[5] Flap Henk D, Ed Boxman. Getting started. The influence of social capital on the start of the occupationalcareer. University of Utrcht, the Netherlands,1996.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[2] Lin N. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[1] Lin N. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[1] Soh Pek-Hooi. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominantdesign.Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(4):438~461.
[2] Shaner Janet, Maznevski Martha. The relationship between networks, institutional development, andperformance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(5):556~568.
[3] Vissa Balagopal. A matching theory of entrepreneurs' tie formation intentions and initiation of economicexchange. Strategic Management Journal,2011,54(1):137~158.
[4] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[5] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[1] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds. Corporate socialcapital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[2] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds. Corporate socialcapital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[3] Smeltzer L R, Van Hook B L, Hutt R W. Analysis and use of advisors as information sources in venturestartups. Journal of Small Business Management,1991,29(3):10~20.
[4] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more) evidence ofembeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[5] Johannisson B, Alexanderson O, Nowicki K, Senneseth K. Beyond anarchy and organization: entrepreneurs incontextual networks. Entrepreneurship Regional Development,1994,6:329~356.
[6] Brown B, Butler J E. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S wine industry.Journal of Small Business Management,1995,33(3):57~66.
[7] Human S E, Provan K G. External resource exchange and perceptions of competitiveness within organizationalnetworks: an organizational learning perspective. In: Reynolds P, et al. eds. Frontiers of EntrepreneurshipResearch,1996:240~252.
[8] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[1] Stuart T E, HoangH, Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurialventures. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):315~349.
[2] Brass D J. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization.Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:518~539.
[3] Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: alongitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(4):317~338.
[4] Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in networks. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1990,35:342~369.
[5] Jones C, Hesterly W S, Borgatti S P. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and socialmechanisms. Academy of Management Review.1997,22(4):911~945.
[6] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:31~41.
[7] Pruitt D G. Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press,1981.
[8] Das T K, Teng B. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances.Administrative Science Quarterly,1998.23(3):491~512.
[9] Saxenian A. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy,1991,20(5):
423~437.
[1] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. AdministrativeScience Quarterly.1997,42:35~47.
[2] Hausler J, Hohn H, Lutz S. Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successful R&Dcollaboration. Research Policy,1994,23(1):47~66.
[3] Katila R, Mang P Y. Interorganizational development activities: the likelihood and timing of contracts.Academy of Management Proceedings,1999, B1–B6..
[4] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:267~294..
[1] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41:116~145.
[2] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[3] Hansen E L, Witkowski T H. Entrepreneur involvement in international marketing: the effects of overseassocial networks and self-imposed barriers to action. In: Hill G E, LaForge R W. eds. Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface,1995:363~367.
[4] Burt R S, Raider H J. Creating careers: women’s paths through entrepreneurship. Working paper,2000.
[5] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[6] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[7] Baum J A, Calabrese C T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21, Special Issue:267~294.
[8] Silverman B S, Baum J A C. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Working paper,2000.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[1] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[2] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. StrategicManagement Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[3] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal,1991,12, Summer Special Issue:105~124.
[4] Kogut B. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review,1988, Special Issue:39~52.
[5] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[6] Baum J A, Calabrese C T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21, Special Issue:267~294.
[7] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper&Row,1978.
[8] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[9] Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on allianceformation. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397~420.
[10] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[1] Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network.Organization Science,1997,8(2):109~125.
[2] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[3] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[4] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[5]Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[1] Louis D, Marino Franz T, Lohrke John S, Hill K. Mark weaver and tulus tambunan. Formation intentions in anemerging economy: evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.2008, January:157~183.
[2]Haiyang Li，Atuahene-Gima Kwaku. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23:469~490.
[3]Ahuja Gautam, Polidoro Jr. Francisco, Mitchell Will. Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formationof alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management Journal.2009,30:941~958.
[4] Rothaerme Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities,and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[5] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review ofSociology,2001,27:415~444.
[6] Lazarsfeld P F, Merton R K. Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In:Berger M. eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand,1954:18~66.
[1] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[2] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[3] Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships integration and future directions. Academy of
Management Review,1990,15(2):241~265.
[1] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[2] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[3] Larson A, Starr J A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.1993,17(2):5~15.
[4] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[1]Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[2] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[1] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: buffering andtransformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4):689~713.
[2] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[3] Singh K, Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form newpartnerships. Strategic Management Journal,1996, Summer Special Issue,17:99~115.
[4] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[5] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. StrategicManagement Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[6] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relationalembeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:
369~386.
[7] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal,1991, Summer Special Issue,12:105~124.
[8] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[9] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[10] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper&Row,1978.
[11] Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N. Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of alliance formation in theautomobile industry. paper presented at the SMJ Special Issue Conference on Strategic Net-works,1999.
[1] Granovetter M. Economic-action and social-structure-the problem of embeddedness. American Journal ofSociology,1985.91(3):481~510.
[1] Williamson Oliver. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press,1975.
[1] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[2] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[3]Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[1] Ingram P, Roberts P W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of
Sociology,2000,106(2):387~423.
[1] Uzzi Brian. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review,1996,61:674~98.
[2] Hardin Russell. Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1982.
[3] Montgomery James D. Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1998,104:92~125.
[4] Dobbin Frank, Timothy J Dowd. How policy shapes competition: early railroad foundings in Massachusetts.Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:501~29.
[5] Coleman James S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap,1990.
[6] Baker Wayne E, Robert R Faulkner. The social organization of conspiracy: illegal networks in the heavyelectrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review,1993,58:837~60.
[7] Palmer Donald, Jennings P Devereaux, Zhou Xueguang. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by largeU.S. corporations: institutional, political and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1993,38:
100~131.
[8] Larson A, Starr J A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1993,17(2):5~15.
[9] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics,1998,10:213~225.
[1] Dubini P, Aldrich H. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1991,6(5):305~313
[2]Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[3]Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1989,9:31~41.
[4] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[5] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[1]Aldrich H, Rosen B, Woodward W. The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: alongitudinal study. In: Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1987:154~168.
[2] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.1995,19(4):7~19.
[3] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. New venture growth and personal networks, Journal of Business Research,1996,36:37~50.
[1] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectiveson organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1] Drucker Peter. The effective executive. NY: Harper&Row Publishers,1966.
[2] Katz Danie, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[3] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[4] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The Academy ofManagement Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[5] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[6] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[7] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[8] Yuchtman E, Seashore S E. A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American SociologicalReview,1967,32:891~903.
[1] Campbell J P, and others. The measurement of organizational effectiveness: a review of relevant research andopinion. Final Report,1974, Navy personnel research and development center contract N00022-73-C-0023.Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions,1974.
[2] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[3] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[4] Perrow C. Three types of effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. Newperspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[5] Gist M E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academyof Management Review,1987,12:472~485.
[6] Tsui A S. A multiple-constituency model of effectiveness: an empirical examination at the human resourcesubunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:458~483.
[7] Cameron K. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutes of higher education. Administrative ScienceQuarterly,1978,23:604~632.
[8] Cameron K S. Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of ManagementJournal,1981,24:25~47.
[9] Cameron K. Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness.Management Science,1986,32:539~553.
[10] Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J, Long D. Educational productivity council employs management science
methods to improve educational quality. Interfaces,1984,14(6):1~8.
[1] Schmitt N, Ostroff C. Pilot study of measurement and model linkages for the comprehensive assessment ofschool environments. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals,1987.
[2] Katz Daniel, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[3] Georgopoulos B S, Tannenbaum A S. A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review,1957,22:534~540.
[4] Argyris Chris. Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press,1962.
[5] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[6] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[7] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The Academy ofManagement Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[8] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1] Katz Daniel, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[2] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1]本章的内容已经作为阶段性成果发表。详见：张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[2] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[3] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[4]Hite Julie M, Hesterly William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Zimmer C, Aldrich H. Resource mobilization through ethnic nNetworks: kinship and friendship ties ofshopkeepers in England. Sociological Perspectives,1987,30:422~445.
[3] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[4] Gimeno J, Folta T B, Cooper A C, Woo C Y. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and thepersistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:750~783.
[5] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[6] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[7] Uzzi Brian. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness.Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[8] Baum J C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):267~294.
[9] Burt R S. The network structure of social capital. In: Sutton R I, Staw B M. eds. Research in organizationalbBehavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT,2000.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1] Mahoney T A. Productivity defined: the relativity of efficiency, effectiveness and change. In: Campbell J P,Campbell J R. Associates, productivity in organizations: new perspectives from industrial and organizationalpsychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1988:230~261.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[2] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[3] Quinn Robert E, John Rohrbaugh. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing valuesapproach to organizational analysis. Management Science,1983,29(3):363~377
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and waysforward. Entrepreneurship Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[3] Jack Sarah L. Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(1):120~137.
[4] Williamson Oliver E. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press,1985.
[5] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[6] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, marketuncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[7] Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective.In: Katz J,Brockhaus R. Advances in Entrepreneurship. Greenwich, JAI Press.1997,3:119~138.
[8] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[1] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[2] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy ofManagement Review,1998,36(1):37~50.
[3] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[4] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial network and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[5] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[6]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[7]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[8] Cowton Christopher J. Corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Ethics.1987,6:
553~558.
[9] Brammer S J, Millington A I. The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between1989and1999: industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review,2003,12(3):216~228.
[10] Saiia D H, Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home.Business and Society,2003,42(2):169~201.
[1] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5:272~280.
[2] Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99~120.
[3] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[4] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectiveson organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[5] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational statusattainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[6] Lin Nan. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[7] Alder P S, Kwon S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(1):17~40.
[8]张广利，陈仕中.社会资本理论发展的瓶颈:定义及测量问题探讨.社会科学研究.2006,2:102~106.
[9] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[10] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[11] Gulati Ranjay. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1995,40(4):619~652.
[12] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[13] Greve Henrich, Baum Joel A, Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Rowley Timothy. Built to last but falling apart: cohesion,friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(2):302~322.
[14] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[15] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[16]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现.中国社会科学.2004,3:136~146
[1] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[2]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[3] Li Haiyang, Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469~490.
[4] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? firm-specific uncertainty, marketuncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[5] Podolny J M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative ScienceQuarterly,1994,39(3):458~483.
[6] Baum J C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):267~294.
[7] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. StrategicManagement Journal,1999,20(12):1133~1156.
[1] Coleman J S. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1990.
[2] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[3] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial network and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[4]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[5]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[6]罗家德.社会网分析讲义.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[7]赵延东，罗家德.以社会网方法衡量社会资本.见：郭毅，罗家德主编.社会资本与管理学.上海:华东理工大学出版社，2007
[8] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[9] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[10] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.1973,78:1360~1380.
[11] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[12] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[13] Rothaermel, Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities,
and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[1] Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Greve Henrich R. A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success:complementary and compatibility. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(5):975~995.
[2] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.1973,78:1360~1380.
[3]Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[4] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational statusattainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[5] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[6] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[7] Bian Yanjie. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. AmericanSociological Review,1997,62(3):366~385.
[8] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4): p481~505.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1]Brush Candida G, Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The effects of initial location, aspirations, andresources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2008,46(2):
159~182.
[2] Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organizational Science,2000,
11,(4):448~469.
[1] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process:examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presented at the1999Academy ofManagement Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[2] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[1]何铮，谭劲松，陆园园.组织环境与组织战略关系的文献综述及最新研究动态.北京：管理世界，2006，11：144~151.
[1] Hannan M T, Freeman J H. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Socilogical Review,1984,49(2):149~164.
[2] Miles R E, Snow C C. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame: how companies succeed or fail. New York: Free Press,1994
[3] Lewin A Y, Volberda H W. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and neworganizational forms. Organization Science,1999,10(5):519~534.
[4] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[5] Tan J, Tan D. Environment-strategy coevolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs undertransition. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:141~157.
[6] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy ofManagement Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[7] Austin J, Skillern J W. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2006:1~22.
[8] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[9] Young E C, Welsch H P. Major elements in entrepreneu rial development in central mexico. Journal of SmallBusiness Management,1993,(10):80~85.
[1]蔡莉，崔启国，史琳.创业环境研究框架.吉林大学社会科学学报，2007，47（1）：50~56.
[2] Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimension of organizational task environment. Administrative Science Quaterly,1984,
29:52~73.
[3] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[4] Tan J. Innovation and risk-takin g in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers andentrepren eurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[5] Luo Yadong. Environment-strategy-performance relations in small business in China: A case of town ship andvillage enterprises in southern China. Journal of Small Business Management,1999,(1):37~52.
[1] Stinchcombe A L. Organizations and social structure. In: James G March. Eds. Handbook of0rganizationsChicago: Rand-McNally,1965:140~200.
[2] Dubini P, Aldrich H E. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process, Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1991,6:305~313.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[4] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[5] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource co-optation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures, Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[6] Jarillo J C. Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources, Journal of Business Venturing,1989,4:133~147.
[7] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[1] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[2] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[1] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper and Row,1978.
[1] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[2] Greiner Larry E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review50,1972:37~46.
[3] Kimberly John R, Miles Robert H, and associates. The organizational life cycle: issues in the creation,transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1980.
[4] Miller D, Friesen P H. A longitudinal study of the corporate lifecycle. Management Science,1984,30(10):1161~1183.
[5]Adizes I. Organizational passages---diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems of organizations. OrganizationalDynamics,1979,8(1):3~25.
[6]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[7] Gray B, Ariss S S. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of ManagementReview,1985,10(4):707~723.
[8] Jawahar I M, McLaughlin G L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach.Academy of Management Review,2001,26(3):397~414.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[1] Tan Justin. Regulatory environment and strategic organizations in a transitional economy: a study of Chineseprivate enterprise. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1996:31~44.
[2] Zahra S, Covin G. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneur shipperformance relationship: Alongitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing g,1995,(10):43~58.
[3] Tan J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: a comparative study of Chinese managers andentrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[1] Lane G. Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust. In: Clane R Bachmann. eds. Trust within andbetween organizations. New York: Oxford University Press,2002:1~30.
[2] Zucker L G. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920. Research inOrganizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,1986,18:53~111.
[3] Thomas C W. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees.Administration&Society,1998,30(5):166~193.
[4] Barney J, Mark H Hansen. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Journal ofManagement,1994,15, Issue Supplement S1:175~190.
[5] Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline View of Trust.Academy of Management Review,1998,(23):393~404.
[6] Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? exploring the effects of interorganizational andinterpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science,1998,(9):141~59.
[7] Zaheer S, Zaheer A. Trust and borders. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,(37):21~29.
[8] Liu S S, Ngo H, Hon A H Y. Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: mediating roles of interpersonal andinterorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research,2006,59:466~474.
[1] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways
forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[3]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]Brush Candida G., Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The Effects of Initial location, aspirations, andresources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2008,46(2):
159~182.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1] Kuhn T. The structure of scientific evolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1962.
[2] Popper K R. The logic of scientific discovery,2nd ed. New York: Harper,1968.
[3]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[4] Wallace W. The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine,1971.
[1]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measure of marketing constructs. Journal of MarketingResearch,1979,16(1):64~73.
[1]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1] Brush C G., Vanderwerf P A. A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1992,7(2):157~170.
[2] Murphy G., Trailer J, Hill R. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of BusinessResearch,1996,36(1):15~23.
[3] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of MarketingResearch,1979,16(1):64~73.
[1]Hansen E. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[2] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[1] Yu Jifeng, Gilbert Brett, Anitra Oviatt, Benjamin M. Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on theinitiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal.2011,32(4):424~446.
[2] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[1] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. QuarterlyJournal of Economics,1997,112（4):1251～1288.
[1] Molina F X, Martínez, M T. Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excess of intensity and trustin relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30:1013~1023.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[3]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[4]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009
[2] Gorsuch R L. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1983.
[1]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009.
[1]罗胜强，姜嬿.调节变量和中介变量.陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京:北京大学出版社，2008：312-331.
[1] Zahra S, Ireland D, Hitt M. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode ofmarket entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43:925~950.
[2] McDougall P Phillips, Shane S, Oviatt B M. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limitsof theories from international business researchJournal of business venturing,1994,9(6):469~487.
[1] Rea L, Parker R. Design and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-BassPublisher,1992.
[1]刘军.管理研究方法.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2008:191.
[1] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[1] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[2] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[1] Porter M E. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York: Free Press,1980.
[2] Porter M E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, New York: Free Press,1985.
[1] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review ofSociology,2001,27:415~444.
[2] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M.. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]杨俊.社会资本、创业机会与新企业初期绩效——基于关键要素互动过程视角的实证研究:[博士学位论文].天津：南开大学，2008.
[2]张慧玉，尹珏林.企业社会责任前移——小企业和新企业的社会角色.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(7):130-135.
[3]张玉利，杨俊.创业研究经典文献述评.天津：南开大学出版社，2010.
[4]费孝通.乡土中国.北京：人民出版社，2008年（初版于上海观察社，1948年）
[5]樊景立，梁建，陈志俊.实证研究的设计与评价.陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[6]林聚任.社会网络分析：理论、方法与应用.北京:北京师范大学出版社，2009
[7]边燕杰.社会网络与求职过程.国外社会学.1999,4.
[8]边燕杰.找回强连带：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职.转引自.中国社会学（第一卷）.上海：上海人民出版社，2002：245.
[9]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[10]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[11]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[12]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现.中国社会科学.2004,3:136~146
[13]张广利，陈仕中.社会资本理论发展的瓶颈:定义及测量问题探讨.社会科学研究.2006,2:102~106.
[14]罗家德.社会网分析讲义.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[15]赵延东，罗家德.以社会网方法衡量社会资本.见：郭毅，罗家德主编.社会资本与管理学.上海:华东理工大学出版社，2007
[16]何铮，谭劲松，陆园园.组织环境与组织战略关系的文献综述及最新研究动态.北京：管理世界，2006，11：144~151.
[17]蔡莉，崔启国，史琳.创业环境研究框架.吉林大学社会科学学报，2007，47（1）：50~56.
[18]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[19]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[20]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008
[21]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008
[22]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009
[23]刘军.管理研究方法.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2008:191.
[1] McClelland, D C. The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand,1961.
[2] Collins O, Moore D G, Unwalla, D. The enterprising man, bureau of business and economicresearch, Graduate School of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing,1967.
[3] McCleland D, Winter D G. Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press,1969.
[4] Liles P. Who are the entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics,1974,22:5~14.
[5] Brockhaus R H, Nord W R. An exploration of factors affecting the entrepreneurial decision:personal characteristics vs. environmental Conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Academy of Management,1979.
[6] Zhang, Huiyu. Games in Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility.8th InternationalConference on Service System and Service Management. Tianjin, China,2011.
[7] Komives J L. A preliminary study of the personal values of high technology entrepreneurs. InA. C. Cooper and J. L. Komives (Eds.), Technical Entrepreneurship: A Symposium.Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1972,231-242.
[8] Hull D L, Bosley J J, Udell G G. Reviewing the heffalump: identifying potentialentrepreneurs by personality characteristics. Journal of Small Business Management,1980,18:11~18.
[9] Brockhaus R H. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:509~520.
[10] Palich L E, Bagby D R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking:Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing,1995,10(6):425-438.
[11] Schumpeter J. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress,1934.
[12] Jennings D, Young D. An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measuresof the product innovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice,1990,15(1):53~66.
[13] Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:41~58.
[14] Liang Chyi-lyi, Dunn Paul. Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy?Relationship between entrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial Learning. Academy ofEntrepreneurship Journal,2008,14(1/2):51~73.
[15] Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality,1962,30(1):29~50.
[16] Cole A H. Definition of entrepreneurship. In: Komives J L, Karl A, eds. Bostrom Seminar inthe Study of Enterprise. Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1969.10~22.
[17] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venturecreation. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[18] Gartner W B. Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question. American Journal of SmallBusiness,1988,12(4):1~22.
[19] Carland J W, Hoy Frank, Carland Jo Ann C. Who is an entreprneur? is a question worthasking. American Journal of Small Business,1988,12(4):33~39.
[20] Low M B, MacMillan I C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future direction. Journal ofManagement,1988,14(2):139~161.
[21] Davidson P. The Entrepreneurial process as a matching problem. Proceedings of Academy ofManagement Conference, Hawaii, U.S.A.,2005.
[22] Covin J G, Slevin D P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and Benignenvironments. Strategic Management Journal,1989,10(1):75~87.
[23] Romanelli E, Environment and strategies of organization start-up: effect on early survival.Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(3):369~387.
[24] Sandberg W, Hofer C W. Improving new venture performance: the role of strategy, industrystructure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing,1987,1:5~28.
[25] Aldrich H E, Fiol C M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.Academy of Management Review,1994,19(4):645~670.
[26] Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by buildinglegitimacy. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):414~431.
[27] Forbes D P. Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of BusinessVenturing,2005,20(5):623~640.
[28] Busenitz L, Barney J. Entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases andheuristic in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9~30.
[29] Stevenson H H, Gumpert D E. The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review,1985,85(2):85~94.
[30] Stevenson H H, Jarillo J C. A perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management.Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(1):17~27.
[31] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[32] Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategicalliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[33] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formationof interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[34] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technologyventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[35] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow WilsonCenter Press,1997.
[36] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more)evidence of embeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[37] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses.Small Business Economics.1998,10:213~225.
[38] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[39] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review.Journal of Business Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[40] Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academyof Management Review,2000,25(1):217~226.
[41] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in theresearch triangle. In: Churchill, N.S., et al., eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[42] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognitionprocess: examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presentedat the1999Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[43] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance oforganizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[44] Uzzi Brian. Social dtructure and vompetition in interfirm networks: the paradox ofembeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[45] Uzzi, Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations andnetworks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):p481-505.
[46] Larson, Andrea and Starr, Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation.Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5-15.
[47] Hite, J. M. The influence of the early firm life cycle on the evolution of entrepreneurialdyadic network ties. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Paper alsoreceived Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Best Conceptual Paper Award,1998.
[48] Hite, Julie M, and Hesterly, William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence toearly growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275–286.
[49] Greve, A, and Salaff, J. W. social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice,2003,27(3):1-22.
[50] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: areview and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[51] Van de Ven A, Poole M S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy ofManagement Review,1995,20(3):510~540.
[52] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[53] Drucker Peter F. The effective executive. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.,1966.
[54] Homans G C. The human group, New York:: Harcourt, Brace&Co.,1950.
[55] Barnes John A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations.1954,7(1):39~58, doi:10.1177/001872675400700102
[56] Barnes John A.. Social networks. Addison-Wesley Module Publications26. Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1972.
[57] Bott Elizabeth. Family and social network.303Park Avenue South, New York: HumanitiesPress,1957.
[58] Mitchell J C. The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J C. eds. Social networksin urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
[59] White Harrison C, Boorman S, Breiger R. Social structure from mutiple networks, I.blockmodels of roles and positon. American Journal of Sociology,1976,81:732.
[60] White H C. Markets from networks: socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,2002.
[61] Granovetter Mark S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(May):1360~1380.
[62] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[63] Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin,1965.
[64] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory andresearch for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[65] Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press,1990.
[66] Putnam Robert D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The AmericanProspect,1993,13(Spring):35~42.
[67] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,2001.
[68] Flap Henk D, Ed Boxman. Getting started. The influence of social capital on the start of theoccupational career. University of Utrcht, the Netherlands,1996.
[69] Soh Pek-Hooi. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of adominant design.Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(4):438~461.
[70] Shaner Janet, Maznevski Martha. The relationship between networks, institutionaldevelopment, and performance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(5):556~568.
[71] Vissa Balagopal. A matching theory of entrepreneurs' tie formation intentions and initiationof economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal,2011,54(1):137~158.
[72] Aldrich and Zimmer,1986
[73] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds.Corporate social capital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[74] Smeltzer L R, Van Hook B L, Hutt R W. Analysis and use of advisors as information sourcesin venture startups. Journal of Small Business Management,1991,29(3):10~20.
[75] Johannisson B, Alexanderson O, Nowicki K, Senneseth K. Beyond anarchy and organization:entrepreneurs in contextual networks. Entrepreneurship Regional Development,1994,6:329~356.
[76] Brown B, Butler J E. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.Swine industry. Journal of Small Business Management,1995,33(3):57~66.
[77] Human S E, Provan K G. External resource exchange and perceptions of competitivenesswithin organizational networks: an organizational learning perspective. In: Reynolds P, et al.eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1996:240~252.
[78] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[79] Stuart T E, HoangH, Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance ofentrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):315~349.
[80] Brass D J. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in anorganization. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:518~539.
[81] Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as a distinctiveorganizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(4):317~338.
[82] Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in networks.Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:342~369.
[83] Jones C, Hesterly W S, Borgatti S P. A general theory of network governance: exchangeconditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review.1997,22(4):911~945.
[84] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:31~41.
[85] Pruitt D G. Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press,1981.
[86] Das T K, Teng B. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation inalliances. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998.23(3):491~512.
[87] Saxenian A. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. ResearchPolicy,1991,20(5):423~437.
[88] Hausler J, Hohn H, Lutz S. Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successfulR&D collaboration. Research Policy,1994,23(1):47~66.
[89] Katila R, Mang P Y. Interorganizational development activities: the likelihood and timing ofcontracts. Academy of Management Proceedings,1999, B1–B6.
[90] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network compositionand startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:267~294.
[91] Hansen E L, Witkowski T H. Entrepreneur involvement in international marketing: theeffects of overseas social networks and self-imposed barriers to action. In: Hill G E, LaForgeR W. eds. Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface,1995:363~367.
[92] Burt R S, Raider H J. Creating careers: women’s paths through entrepreneurship. Workingpaper,2000.
[93] Silverman B S, Baum J A C. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Working paper,2000.
[94] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on companyperformance. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[95] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. StrategicManagement Journal,1991,12, Summer Special Issue:105~124.
[96] Kogut B. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review,1988,Special Issue:39~52.
[97] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependenceperspective. New York: Harper&Row,1978.
[98] Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firmcapabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397~420.
[99] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? AmericanJournal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[100] Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of anindustry network. Organization Science,1997,8(2):109~125.
[101] Louis D, Marino Franz T, Lohrke John S, Hill K. Mark weaver and tulus tambunan.Formation intentions in an emerging economy: evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis inIndonesia. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.2008, January:157~183.
[102] Haiyang Li，Atuahene-Gima Kwaku. The adoption of agency business activity, productinnovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal,2002,23:469~490.
[103] Ahuja Gautam, Polidoro Jr. Francisco, Mitchell Will. Structural homophily or socialasymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic ManagementJournal.2009,30:941~958.
[104] Rothaerme Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology:complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[105] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in socialnetworks. Annual Review of Sociology,2001,27:415~444.
[106] Lazarsfeld P F, Merton R K. Friendship as a social process: a substantive andmethodological analysis. In: Berger M. eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. NewYork: Van Nostrand,1954:18~66.
[107] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? AmericanJournal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[108] Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships integration and futuredirections. Academy of Management Review,1990,15(2):241~265.
[109] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisitionstrategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[110] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and populationdynamics: buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4):689~713.
[111] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[112] Singh K, Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut downor form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal,1996, Summer Special Issue,17:99~115.
[113] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on companyperformance. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[114] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis ofstructural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. StrategicManagement Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:369~386.
[115] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. StrategicManagement Journal,1991, Summer Special Issue,12:105~124.
[116] Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N. Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of allianceformation in the automobile industry. paper presented at the SMJ Special Issue Conferenceon Strategic Net-works,1999.
[117] Williamson Oliver. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press,1975.
[118] Ingram P, Roberts P W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry.American Journal of Sociology,2000,106(2):387~423.
[119] Hardin Russell. Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1982.
[120] Montgomery James D. Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. AmericanJournal of Sociology,1998,104:92~125.
[121] Dobbin Frank, Timothy J Dowd. How policy shapes competition: early railroad foundingsin Massachusetts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:501~29.
[122] Baker Wayne E, Robert R Faulkner. The social organization of conspiracy: illegalnetworks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review,1993,58:837~60.
[123] Coleman James S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap,1990.
[124] Palmer Donald, Jennings P Devereaux, Zhou Xueguang. Late adoption of themultidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: institutional, political and economicaccounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1993,38:100~131.
[125] Dubini P, Aldrich H. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurialprocess. Journal of Business Venturing,1991,6(5):305~313
[126] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1989,9:31~41.
[127] Aldrich H, Rosen B, Woodward W. The impact of social networks on business foundingsand profit: a longitudinal study. In: Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of EntrepreneurshipResearch,1987:154~168.
[128] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice.1995,19(4):7~19.
[129] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. New venture growth and personal networks, Journal of BusinessResearch,1996,36:37~50.
[130] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds.New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[131] Drucker Peter. The effective executive. NY: Harper&Row Publishers,1966.
[132] Katz Danie, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[133] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman PaulS, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[134] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency.The Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[135] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: GoodmanPaul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[136] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S,Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[137] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance.Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[138] Yuchtman E, Seashore S E. A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness.American Sociological Review,1967,32:891~903.
[139] Campbell J P, and others. The measurement of organizational effectiveness: a review ofrelevant research and opinion. Final Report,1974, Navy personnel research anddevelopment center contract N00022-73-C-0023. Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions,1974.
[140] Perrow C. Three types of effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[141] Gist M E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resourcemanagement. Academy of Management Review,1987,12:472~485.
[142] Tsui A S. A multiple-constituency model of effectiveness: an empirical examination at thehuman resource subunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:458~483.
[143] Cameron K. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutes of higher education.Administrative Science Quarterly,1978,23:604~632.
[144] Cameron K S. Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities.Academy of Management Journal,1981,24:25~47.
[145] Cameron K. Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions oforganizational effectiveness. Management Science,1986,32:539~553.
[146] Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J, Long D. Educational productivity council employsmanagement science methods to improve educational quality. Interfaces,1984,14(6):1~8.
[147] Schmitt N, Ostroff C. Pilot study of measurement and model linkages for thecomprehensive assessment of school environments. Reston, VA: National Association ofSecondary School Principals,1987.
[148] Georgopoulos B S, Tannenbaum A S. A study of organizational effectiveness. AmericanSociological Review,1957,22:534~540.
[149] Argyris Chris. Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill:Dorsey Press,1962.
[150] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: GoodmanPaul S, Pennings Johannes M. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[151] Hite Julie M, Hesterly William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence toearly growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275~286.
[152] Zimmer C, Aldrich H. Resource mobilization through ethnic nNetworks: kinship andfriendship ties of shopkeepers in England. Sociological Perspectives,1987,30:422~445.
[153] Gimeno J, Folta T B, Cooper A C, Woo C Y. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial humancapital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:750~783.
[154] Burt R S. The network structure of social capital. In: Sutton R I, Staw B M. eds. Researchin organizational bBehavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT,2000.
[155] Mahoney T A. Productivity defined: the relativity of efficiency, effectiveness and change.In: Campbell J P, Campbell J R. Associates, productivity in organizations: newperspectives from industrial and organizational psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1988:230~261.
[156] Quinn Robert E, John Rohrbaugh. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards acompeting values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science,1983,29(3):363~377
[157] Jack Sarah L. Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2010,25(1):120~137.
[158] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specificuncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[159] Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor'sperspective.In: Katz J, Brockhaus R. Advances in Entrepreneurship. Greenwich, JAI Press.1997,3:119~138.
[160] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizationaladvantage. Academy of Management Review,1998,36(1):37~50.
[161] Cowton Christopher J. Corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom. Journal ofBusiness Ethics.1987,6:553~558.
[162] Brammer S J, Millington A I. The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in theUK between1989and1999: industry structure and stakeholder influences. BusinessEthics: A European Review,2003,12(3):216~228.
[163] Saiia D H, Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charitybegins at home. Business and Society,2003,42(2):169~201.
[164] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5:272~280.
[165] Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99~120.
[166] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[167] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors inoccupational status attainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[168] Lin Nan. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,2001.
[169] Alder P S, Kwon S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of ManagementReview,2002,27(1):17~40.
[170] Gulati Ranjay. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(4):619~652.
[171] Greve Henrich, Baum Joel A, Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Rowley Timothy. Built to last butfalling apart: cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy ofManagement Journal,2010,53(2):302~322.
[172] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Socialstructure and network analysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[173] Li Haiyang, Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. The adoption of agency business activity, productinnovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal,2002,23(6):469~490.
[174] Podolny J M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange.Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39(3):458~483.
[175] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitivecapabilities. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133~1156.
[176] Coleman J S. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1990.
[177] Rothaermel, Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology:complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[178] Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Greve Henrich R. A matching theory of alliance formation andorganizational success: complementary and compatibility. Academy of ManagementJournal,2009,52(5):975~995.
[179] Bian Yanjie. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searchesin China. American Sociological Review,1997,62(3):366~385.
[180] Brush Candida G, Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The effects of initial location,aspirations, and resources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of SmallBusiness Management,2008,46(2):159~182.
[181] Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities.Organizational Science,2000,11,(4):448~469.
[182] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunityrecognition process: examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks.Paper presented at the1999Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[183] Hannan M T, Freeman J H. Structural inertia and organizational change. AmericanSocilogical Review,1984,49(2):149~164.
[184] Miles R E, Snow C C. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame: how companies succeed or fail.New York: Free Press,1994
[185] Lewin A Y, Volberda H W. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research onstrategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science,1999,10(5):519~534.
[186] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication:an empirical study of the Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[187] Tan J, Tan D. Environment-strategy coevolution and co-alignment: a staged model ofChinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:141~157.
[188] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venturecreation. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[189] Austin J, Skillern J W. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2006:1~22.
[190] Young E C, Welsch H P. Major elements in entrepreneu rial development in central mexico.Journal of Small Business Management,1993,(10):80~85.
[191] Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimension of organizational task environment. AdministrativeScience Quaterly,1984,29:52~73.
[192] Tan J. Innovation and risk-takin g in a transitional economy: A comparative study ofChinese managers and entrepren eurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[193] Luo Yadong. Environment-strategy-performance relations in small business in China: Acase of town ship and village enterprises in southern China. Journal of Small BusinessManagement,1999,(1):37~52.
[194] Stinchcombe A L. Organizations and social structure. In: James G March. Eds. Handbookof0rganizations Chicago: Rand-McNally,1965:140~200.
[195] Dubini P, Aldrich H E. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurialprocess, Journal of Business Venturing,1991,6:305~313.
[196] Jarillo J C. Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources, Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1989,4:133~147.
[197] Greiner Larry E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard BusinessReview50,1972:37~46.
[198] Kimberly John R, Miles Robert H, and associates. The organizational life cycle: issues inthe creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1980.
[199] Miller D, Friesen P H. A longitudinal study of the corporate lifecycle. ManagementScience,1984,30(10):1161~1183.
[200] Adizes I. Organizational passages---diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems oforganizations. Organizational Dynamics,1979,8(1):3~25.
[201] Gray B, Ariss S S. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academyof Management Review,1985,10(4):707~723.
[202] Jawahar I M, McLaughlin G L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizationallife cycle approach. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(3):397~414.
[203] Tan Justin. Regulatory environment and strategic organizations in a transitional economy:a study of Chinese private enterprise. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1996:31~44.
[204] Zahra S, Covin G. Contextual influen ces on the corporate entrepreneur shipperformancerelationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing g,1995,(10):43~58.
[205] Tan J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: a comparative study ofChinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[206] Lane G. Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust. In: Clane R Bachmann. eds.Trust within and between organizations. New York: Oxford University Press,2002:1~30.
[207] Zucker L G. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920.Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,1986,18:53~111.
[208] Thomas C W. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and theiremployees. Administration&Society,1998,30(5):166~193.
[209] Barney J, Mark H Hansen. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. StrategicJournal of Management,1994,15, Issue Supplement S1:175~190.
[210] Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C. Not so different after all: Across-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review,1998,(23):393~404.
[211] Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? exploring the effects ofinterorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science,1998,(9):141~59.
[212] Zaheer S, Zaheer A. Trust and borders. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,(37):21~29.
[213] Liu S S, Ngo H, Hon A H Y. Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: mediating roles ofinterpersonal and interorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research,2006,59:466~474.
[214] Kuhn T. The structure of scientific evolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1962.
[215] Popper K R. The logic of scientific discovery,2nd ed. New York: Harper,1968.
[216] Wallace W. The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine,1971.
[217] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measure of marketing constructs. Journalof Marketing Research,1979,16(1):64~73.
[218] Brush C G., Vanderwerf P A. A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimatesof new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1992,7(2):157~170.
[219] Murphy G., Trailer J, Hill R. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journalof Business Research,1996,36(1):15~23.
[220] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venturestrategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[221] Yu Jifeng, Gilbert Brett, Anitra Oviatt, Benjamin M. Effects of alliances, time, andnetwork cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal.2011,32(4):424~446.
[222] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-countryinvestigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112（4):1251～1288.
[223] Molina F X, Martínez, M T. Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excessof intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. StrategicManagement Journal,2009,30:1013~1023.
[224] Gorsuch R L. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1983.
[225] Zahra S, Ireland D, Hitt M. International expansion by new venture firms: internationaldiversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy ofManagement Journal,2000,43:925~950.
[226] McDougall P Phillips, Shane S, Oviatt B M. Explaining the formation of international newventures: the limits of theories from international business researchJournal of businessventuring,1994,9(6):469~487.
[227] Rea L, Parker R. Design and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher,1992.
[228] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venturestrategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[229] Porter M E. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors,New York: Free Press,1980.
[230] Porter M E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, NewYork: Free Press,1985.
[231] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in socialnetworks. Annual Review of Sociology,2001,27:415~444.
（09YJC630132）的支持。
[1]张慧玉，尹珏林.企业社会责任前移——小企业和新企业的社会角色.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(7):130-135.
[2]杨俊.社会资本、创业机会与新企业初期绩效——基于关键要素互动过程视角的实证研究:[博士学位论文].天津：南开大学，2008.
[3]张玉利，杨俊.创业研究经典文献述评.天津：南开大学出版社，2010.
[1] McClelland, D C. The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand,1961.
[2] Collins O, Moore D G, Unwalla, D. The enterprising man, bureau of business and economic research, GraduateSchool of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing,1967.
[3] McCleland D, Winter D G. Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press,1969.
[4] Liles P. Who are the entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics,1974,22:5~14.
[5] Brockhaus R H, Nord W R. An exploration of factors affecting the entrepreneurial decision: personalcharacteristics vs. environmental Conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management,1979.
[6] Komives J L. A preliminary study of the personal values of high technology entrepreneurs. In A. C. Cooperand J. L. Komives (Eds.), Technical Entrepreneurship: A Symposium. Milwaukee: Center for VentureManagement,1972,231-242.
[7] Hull D L, Bosley J J, Udell G G. Reviewing the heffalump: identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality
characteristics. Journal of Small Business Management,1980,18:11~18.
[1] Brockhaus R H. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:
509~520.
[2] Palich L E, Bagby D R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challengingconventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing,1995,10(6):425-438.
[3] Schumpeter J. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1934.
[4] Jennings D, Young D. An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measures of the productinnovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1990,15(1):53~66.
[5] Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:41~58.
[6] Liang Chyi-lyi, Dunn Paul. Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy? Relationship betweenentrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial Learning. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal,2008,14(1/2):51~73.
[7] Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality,1962,30(1):29~50.
[8] Cole A H. Definition of entrepreneurship. In: Komives J L, Karl A, eds. Bostrom Seminar in the Study ofEnterprise. Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1969.10~22.
[1] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy ofManagement Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[2] Zhang, Huiyu. Games in Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility.8th International Conference onService System and Service Management. Tianjin, China,2011.
[3] Gartner W B. Who is an entrepreneur? iIs the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business,1988,12
(4):1~22.
[4] Carland J W, Hoy Frank, Carland Jo Ann C. Who is an entreprneur? is a question worth asking. AmericanJournal of Small Business,1988,12(4):33~39.
[5] Low M B, MacMillan I C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future direction. Journal of Management,1988,14(2):139~161.
[1] Davidson P. The Entrepreneurial process as a matching problem. Proceedings of Academy of ManagementConference, Hawaii, U.S.A.,2005.
[1] Covin J G, Slevin D P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and Benign environments. StrategicManagement Journal,1989,10(1):75~87.
[2] Romanelli E, Environment and strategies of organization start-up: effect on early survival. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1989,34(3):369~387.
[3] Sandberg W, Hofer C W. Improving new venture performance: the role of strategy, industry structure, and theentrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing,1987,1:5~28.
[1] Aldrich H E, Fiol C M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of ManagementReview,1994,19(4):645~670.
[2] Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academyof Management Review,2002,27(3):414~431.
[3] Forbes D P. Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(5):623~640.
[4] Busenitz L, Barney J. Entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristic in strategicdecision-making. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9~30.
[5] Stevenson H H, Gumpert D E. The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review,1985,85(2):85~94.
[6] Stevenson H H, Jarillo J C. A perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. StrategicManagement Journal,1990,11(1):17~27.
[7] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of Embeddedness. American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[1] Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[2] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures,defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[4] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[5] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more) evidence ofembeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[6] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[7] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of ManagementReview,2000,25(1):217~226.
[3] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al., eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[4] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process:examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presented at the1999Academy ofManagement Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[5] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[6] Uzzi Brian. Social dtructure and vompetition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness.Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[7] Uzzi, Brian. Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks BenefitFirms Seeking Financing [J]. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4): p481-505.
[8] Larson, Andrea and Starr, Jennifer A. A Network Model of Organization Formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5-15.
[9] Hite, J. M. The Influence of the Early Firm Life Cycle on the Evolution of Entrepreneurial Dyadic NetworkTies [R]. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Paper also received Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice Best Conceptual Paper Award,1998.
[10] Hite, Julie M, and Hesterly, William S. The Evolution of Firm Networks: from Emergence to Early Growth ofthe Firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275–286.
[11] Greve, A, and Salaff, J. W. Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1-22.
[1] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and waysforward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[2] Van de Ven A, Poole M S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of ManagementReview,1995,20(3):510~540.
[3] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[4] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[1]费孝通.乡土中国.北京：人民出版社，2008年（初版于上海观察社，1948年）
[2] Drucker Peter F. The effective executive. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.,1966.
[1]樊景立，梁建，陈志俊.实证研究的设计与评价. In:陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1]林聚任.社会网络分析：理论、方法与应用.北京:北京师范大学出版社，2009
[1] Homans G C. The human group, New York:: Harcourt, Brace&Co.,1950.
[2] Barnes John A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations.1954,7(1):39~58, doi:10.1177/001872675400700102
[3] Barnes John A.. Social networks. Addison-Wesley Module Publications26. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley,1972.
[4] Bott Elizabeth. Family and social network.303Park Avenue South, New York: Humanities Press,1957.
[5]Mitchell J C. The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J C. eds. Social networks in
urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
[1] White Harrison C, Boorman S, Breiger R. Social structure from mutiple networks, I. blockmodels of roles andpositon. American Journal of Sociology,1976,81:732.
[2] White H C. Markets from networks: socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress,2002.
[1] Granovetter Mark S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(May):1360~1380.
[1]边燕杰.社会网络与求职过程.国外社会学.1999,4.
[2]边燕杰.找回强连带：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职.转引自.中国社会学（第一卷）.上海：上海人民出版社，2002：245.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[2] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[3] Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin,1965.
[1] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory and research for thesociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[1] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory and research for thesociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[2] Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press,1990.
[3] Putnam Robert D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The American Prospect,1993,
13(Spring):35~42.
[4] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[5] Flap Henk D, Ed Boxman. Getting started. The influence of social capital on the start of the occupationalcareer. University of Utrcht, the Netherlands,1996.
[1] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
[2] Lin N. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[1] Lin N. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[1] Soh Pek-Hooi. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominantdesign.Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(4):438~461.
[2] Shaner Janet, Maznevski Martha. The relationship between networks, institutional development, andperformance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(5):556~568.
[3] Vissa Balagopal. A matching theory of entrepreneurs' tie formation intentions and initiation of economicexchange. Strategic Management Journal,2011,54(1):137~158.
[4] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[5] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[1] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds. Corporate socialcapital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[2] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds. Corporate socialcapital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[3] Smeltzer L R, Van Hook B L, Hutt R W. Analysis and use of advisors as information sources in venturestartups. Journal of Small Business Management,1991,29(3):10~20.
[4] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more) evidence ofembeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[5] Johannisson B, Alexanderson O, Nowicki K, Senneseth K. Beyond anarchy and organization: entrepreneurs incontextual networks. Entrepreneurship Regional Development,1994,6:329~356.
[6] Brown B, Butler J E. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S wine industry.Journal of Small Business Management,1995,33(3):57~66.
[7] Human S E, Provan K G. External resource exchange and perceptions of competitiveness within organizationalnetworks: an organizational learning perspective. In: Reynolds P, et al. eds. Frontiers of EntrepreneurshipResearch,1996:240~252.
[8] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[1] Stuart T E, HoangH, Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurialventures. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):315~349.
[2] Brass D J. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization.Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:518~539.
[3] Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: alongitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(4):317~338.
[4] Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in networks. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1990,35:342~369.
[5] Jones C, Hesterly W S, Borgatti S P. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and socialmechanisms. Academy of Management Review.1997,22(4):911~945.
[6] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:31~41.
[7] Pruitt D G. Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press,1981.
[8] Das T K, Teng B. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances.Administrative Science Quarterly,1998.23(3):491~512.
[9] Saxenian A. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy,1991,20(5):
423~437.
[1] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. AdministrativeScience Quarterly.1997,42:35~47.
[2] Hausler J, Hohn H, Lutz S. Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successful R&Dcollaboration. Research Policy,1994,23(1):47~66.
[3] Katila R, Mang P Y. Interorganizational development activities: the likelihood and timing of contracts.Academy of Management Proceedings,1999, B1–B6..
[4] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:267~294..
[1] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41:116~145.
[2] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[3] Hansen E L, Witkowski T H. Entrepreneur involvement in international marketing: the effects of overseassocial networks and self-imposed barriers to action. In: Hill G E, LaForge R W. eds. Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface,1995:363~367.
[4] Burt R S, Raider H J. Creating careers: women’s paths through entrepreneurship. Working paper,2000.
[5] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[6] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[7] Baum J A, Calabrese C T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21, Special Issue:267~294.
[8] Silverman B S, Baum J A C. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Working paper,2000.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[1] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[2] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. StrategicManagement Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[3] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal,1991,12, Summer Special Issue:105~124.
[4] Kogut B. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review,1988, Special Issue:39~52.
[5] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[6] Baum J A, Calabrese C T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21, Special Issue:267~294.
[7] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper&Row,1978.
[8] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[9] Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on allianceformation. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397~420.
[10] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[1] Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network.Organization Science,1997,8(2):109~125.
[2] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[3] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science,1996,7(2):136~150.
[4] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[5]Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[1] Louis D, Marino Franz T, Lohrke John S, Hill K. Mark weaver and tulus tambunan. Formation intentions in anemerging economy: evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.2008, January:157~183.
[2]Haiyang Li，Atuahene-Gima Kwaku. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23:469~490.
[3]Ahuja Gautam, Polidoro Jr. Francisco, Mitchell Will. Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formationof alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management Journal.2009,30:941~958.
[4] Rothaerme Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities,and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[5] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review ofSociology,2001,27:415~444.
[6] Lazarsfeld P F, Merton R K. Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In:Berger M. eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand,1954:18~66.
[1] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[2] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[3] Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships integration and future directions. Academy of
Management Review,1990,15(2):241~265.
[1] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[2] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[3] Larson A, Starr J A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.1993,17(2):5~15.
[4] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[1]Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[2] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[1] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: buffering andtransformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4):689~713.
[2] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[3] Singh K, Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form newpartnerships. Strategic Management Journal,1996, Summer Special Issue,17:99~115.
[4] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[5] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. StrategicManagement Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[6] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relationalembeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:
369~386.
[7] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal,1991, Summer Special Issue,12:105~124.
[8] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[9] Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1):116~145.
[10] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper&Row,1978.
[11] Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N. Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of alliance formation in theautomobile industry. paper presented at the SMJ Special Issue Conference on Strategic Net-works,1999.
[1] Granovetter M. Economic-action and social-structure-the problem of embeddedness. American Journal ofSociology,1985.91(3):481~510.
[1] Williamson Oliver. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press,1975.
[1] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[2] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[3]Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:267~294.
[1] Ingram P, Roberts P W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of
Sociology,2000,106(2):387~423.
[1] Uzzi Brian. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review,1996,61:674~98.
[2] Hardin Russell. Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1982.
[3] Montgomery James D. Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1998,104:92~125.
[4] Dobbin Frank, Timothy J Dowd. How policy shapes competition: early railroad foundings in Massachusetts.Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:501~29.
[5] Coleman James S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap,1990.
[6] Baker Wayne E, Robert R Faulkner. The social organization of conspiracy: illegal networks in the heavyelectrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review,1993,58:837~60.
[7] Palmer Donald, Jennings P Devereaux, Zhou Xueguang. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by largeU.S. corporations: institutional, political and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1993,38:
100~131.
[8] Larson A, Starr J A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1993,17(2):5~15.
[9] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics,1998,10:213~225.
[1] Dubini P, Aldrich H. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1991,6(5):305~313
[2]Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[3]Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1989,9:31~41.
[4] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[5] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[1]Aldrich H, Rosen B, Woodward W. The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: alongitudinal study. In: Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1987:154~168.
[2] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.1995,19(4):7~19.
[3] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. New venture growth and personal networks, Journal of Business Research,1996,36:37~50.
[1] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectiveson organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1] Drucker Peter. The effective executive. NY: Harper&Row Publishers,1966.
[2] Katz Danie, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[3] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[4] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The Academy ofManagement Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[5] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[6] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[7] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[8] Yuchtman E, Seashore S E. A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American SociologicalReview,1967,32:891~903.
[1] Campbell J P, and others. The measurement of organizational effectiveness: a review of relevant research andopinion. Final Report,1974, Navy personnel research and development center contract N00022-73-C-0023.Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions,1974.
[2] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[3] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[4] Perrow C. Three types of effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. Newperspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[5] Gist M E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academyof Management Review,1987,12:472~485.
[6] Tsui A S. A multiple-constituency model of effectiveness: an empirical examination at the human resourcesubunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:458~483.
[7] Cameron K. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutes of higher education. Administrative ScienceQuarterly,1978,23:604~632.
[8] Cameron K S. Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of ManagementJournal,1981,24:25~47.
[9] Cameron K. Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness.Management Science,1986,32:539~553.
[10] Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J, Long D. Educational productivity council employs management science
methods to improve educational quality. Interfaces,1984,14(6):1~8.
[1] Schmitt N, Ostroff C. Pilot study of measurement and model linkages for the comprehensive assessment ofschool environments. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals,1987.
[2] Katz Daniel, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[3] Georgopoulos B S, Tannenbaum A S. A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review,1957,22:534~540.
[4] Argyris Chris. Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press,1962.
[5] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[6] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[7] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The Academy ofManagement Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[8] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1] Katz Daniel, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[2] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, PenningsJohannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[1]本章的内容已经作为阶段性成果发表。详见：张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[2] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[3] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[4]Hite Julie M, Hesterly William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Zimmer C, Aldrich H. Resource mobilization through ethnic nNetworks: kinship and friendship ties ofshopkeepers in England. Sociological Perspectives,1987,30:422~445.
[3] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[4] Gimeno J, Folta T B, Cooper A C, Woo C Y. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and thepersistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:750~783.
[5] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[6] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[7] Uzzi Brian. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness.Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[8] Baum J C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):267~294.
[9] Burt R S. The network structure of social capital. In: Sutton R I, Staw B M. eds. Research in organizationalbBehavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT,2000.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1] Mahoney T A. Productivity defined: the relativity of efficiency, effectiveness and change. In: Campbell J P,Campbell J R. Associates, productivity in organizations: new perspectives from industrial and organizationalpsychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1988:230~261.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[2] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[3] Quinn Robert E, John Rohrbaugh. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing valuesapproach to organizational analysis. Management Science,1983,29(3):363~377
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and waysforward. Entrepreneurship Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[3] Jack Sarah L. Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(1):120~137.
[4] Williamson Oliver E. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press,1985.
[5] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[6] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, marketuncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[7] Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective.In: Katz J,Brockhaus R. Advances in Entrepreneurship. Greenwich, JAI Press.1997,3:119~138.
[8] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[1] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[2] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy ofManagement Review,1998,36(1):37~50.
[3] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[4] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial network and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[5] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[6]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[7]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[8] Cowton Christopher J. Corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Ethics.1987,6:
553~558.
[9] Brammer S J, Millington A I. The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between1989and1999: industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review,2003,12(3):216~228.
[10] Saiia D H, Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home.Business and Society,2003,42(2):169~201.
[1] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5:272~280.
[2] Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99~120.
[3] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[4] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectiveson organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[5] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational statusattainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[6] Lin Nan. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[7] Alder P S, Kwon S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(1):17~40.
[8]张广利，陈仕中.社会资本理论发展的瓶颈:定义及测量问题探讨.社会科学研究.2006,2:102~106.
[9] Eisenhardt Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation:strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[10] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirmlinkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[11] Gulati Ranjay. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1995,40(4):619~652.
[12] Greve A, Salaff J W. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(3):1~22.
[13] Greve Henrich, Baum Joel A, Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Rowley Timothy. Built to last but falling apart: cohesion,friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(2):302~322.
[14] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[15] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[16]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现.中国社会科学.2004,3:136~146
[1] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[2]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[3] Li Haiyang, Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, andperformance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469~490.
[4] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? firm-specific uncertainty, marketuncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[5] Podolny J M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative ScienceQuarterly,1994,39(3):458~483.
[6] Baum J C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):267~294.
[7] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. StrategicManagement Journal,1999,20(12):1133~1156.
[1] Coleman J S. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1990.
[2] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[3] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial network and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[4]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[5]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[6]罗家德.社会网分析讲义.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[7]赵延东，罗家德.以社会网方法衡量社会资本.见：郭毅，罗家德主编.社会资本与管理学.上海:华东理工大学出版社，2007
[8] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Social structure and networkanalysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[9] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development.2004,16:391~412.
[10] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.1973,78:1360~1380.
[11] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[12] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[13] Rothaermel, Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities,
and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[1] Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Greve Henrich R. A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success:complementary and compatibility. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(5):975~995.
[2] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.1973,78:1360~1380.
[3]Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[4] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational statusattainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[5] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78:1360~1380.
[6] Burt R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competiton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[7] Bian Yanjie. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. AmericanSociological Review,1997,62(3):366~385.
[8] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4): p481~505.
[1]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[1]Brush Candida G, Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The effects of initial location, aspirations, andresources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2008,46(2):
159~182.
[2] Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organizational Science,2000,
11,(4):448~469.
[1] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process:examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presented at the1999Academy ofManagement Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[2] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[1]何铮，谭劲松，陆园园.组织环境与组织战略关系的文献综述及最新研究动态.北京：管理世界，2006，11：144~151.
[1] Hannan M T, Freeman J H. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Socilogical Review,1984,49(2):149~164.
[2] Miles R E, Snow C C. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame: how companies succeed or fail. New York: Free Press,1994
[3] Lewin A Y, Volberda H W. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and neworganizational forms. Organization Science,1999,10(5):519~534.
[4] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[5] Tan J, Tan D. Environment-strategy coevolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs undertransition. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:141~157.
[6] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy ofManagement Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[7] Austin J, Skillern J W. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice,2006:1~22.
[8] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[9] Young E C, Welsch H P. Major elements in entrepreneu rial development in central mexico. Journal of SmallBusiness Management,1993,(10):80~85.
[1]蔡莉，崔启国，史琳.创业环境研究框架.吉林大学社会科学学报，2007，47（1）：50~56.
[2] Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimension of organizational task environment. Administrative Science Quaterly,1984,
29:52~73.
[3] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication: an empirical study ofthe Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[4] Tan J. Innovation and risk-takin g in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers andentrepren eurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[5] Luo Yadong. Environment-strategy-performance relations in small business in China: A case of town ship andvillage enterprises in southern China. Journal of Small Business Management,1999,(1):37~52.
[1] Stinchcombe A L. Organizations and social structure. In: James G March. Eds. Handbook of0rganizationsChicago: Rand-McNally,1965:140~200.
[2] Dubini P, Aldrich H E. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process, Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1991,6:305~313.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[4] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[5] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource co-optation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for newventures, Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[6] Jarillo J C. Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources, Journal of Business Venturing,1989,4:133~147.
[7] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal ofSociology.1985,91(3):481~510.
[1] Larson Andrea, Starr Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5~15.
[2] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In:Churchill, N.S., et al. eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[1] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York:Harper and Row,1978.
[1] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[2] Greiner Larry E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review50,1972:37~46.
[3] Kimberly John R, Miles Robert H, and associates. The organizational life cycle: issues in the creation,transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1980.
[4] Miller D, Friesen P H. A longitudinal study of the corporate lifecycle. Management Science,1984,30(10):1161~1183.
[5]Adizes I. Organizational passages---diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems of organizations. OrganizationalDynamics,1979,8(1):3~25.
[6]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[7] Gray B, Ariss S S. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of ManagementReview,1985,10(4):707~723.
[8] Jawahar I M, McLaughlin G L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach.Academy of Management Review,2001,26(3):397~414.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[1] Tan Justin. Regulatory environment and strategic organizations in a transitional economy: a study of Chineseprivate enterprise. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1996:31~44.
[2] Zahra S, Covin G. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneur shipperformance relationship: Alongitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing g,1995,(10):43~58.
[3] Tan J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: a comparative study of Chinese managers andentrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[1] Lane G. Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust. In: Clane R Bachmann. eds. Trust within andbetween organizations. New York: Oxford University Press,2002:1~30.
[2] Zucker L G. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920. Research inOrganizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,1986,18:53~111.
[3] Thomas C W. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees.Administration&Society,1998,30(5):166~193.
[4] Barney J, Mark H Hansen. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Journal ofManagement,1994,15, Issue Supplement S1:175~190.
[5] Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline View of Trust.Academy of Management Review,1998,(23):393~404.
[6] Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? exploring the effects of interorganizational andinterpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science,1998,(9):141~59.
[7] Zaheer S, Zaheer A. Trust and borders. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,(37):21~29.
[8] Liu S S, Ngo H, Hon A H Y. Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: mediating roles of interpersonal andinterorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research,2006,59:466~474.
[1] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways
forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[1] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[3]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]Brush Candida G., Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The Effects of Initial location, aspirations, andresources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2008,46(2):
159~182.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1] Kuhn T. The structure of scientific evolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1962.
[2] Popper K R. The logic of scientific discovery,2nd ed. New York: Harper,1968.
[3]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[4] Wallace W. The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine,1971.
[1]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measure of marketing constructs. Journal of MarketingResearch,1979,16(1):64~73.
[1]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[1] Brush C G., Vanderwerf P A. A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1992,7(2):157~170.
[2] Murphy G., Trailer J, Hill R. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of BusinessResearch,1996,36(1):15~23.
[3] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of MarketingResearch,1979,16(1):64~73.
[1]Hansen E. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1995,19(4):7~19.
[2] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[1] Yu Jifeng, Gilbert Brett, Anitra Oviatt, Benjamin M. Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on theinitiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal.2011,32(4):424~446.
[2] Uzzi Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firmsseeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):481~505.
[1] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. QuarterlyJournal of Economics,1997,112（4):1251～1288.
[1] Molina F X, Martínez, M T. Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excess of intensity and trustin relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30:1013~1023.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[2]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[3]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[4]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009
[2] Gorsuch R L. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1983.
[1]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009.
[1]罗胜强，姜嬿.调节变量和中介变量.陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京:北京大学出版社，2008：312-331.
[1] Zahra S, Ireland D, Hitt M. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode ofmarket entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43:925~950.
[2] McDougall P Phillips, Shane S, Oviatt B M. Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limitsof theories from international business researchJournal of business venturing,1994,9(6):469~487.
[1] Rea L, Parker R. Design and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-BassPublisher,1992.
[1]刘军.管理研究方法.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2008:191.
[1] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and ventureperformance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[1] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small BusinessEconomics.1998,10:213~225.
[2] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,1997.
[1] Porter M E. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New York: Free Press,1980.
[2] Porter M E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, New York: Free Press,1985.
[1] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review ofSociology,2001,27:415~444.
[2] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2001.
[3] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M.. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defensemechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[1]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[1]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[1]杨俊.社会资本、创业机会与新企业初期绩效——基于关键要素互动过程视角的实证研究:[博士学位论文].天津：南开大学，2008.
[2]张慧玉，尹珏林.企业社会责任前移——小企业和新企业的社会角色.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(7):130-135.
[3]张玉利，杨俊.创业研究经典文献述评.天津：南开大学出版社，2010.
[4]费孝通.乡土中国.北京：人民出版社，2008年（初版于上海观察社，1948年）
[5]樊景立，梁建，陈志俊.实证研究的设计与评价.陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008.
[6]林聚任.社会网络分析：理论、方法与应用.北京:北京师范大学出版社，2009
[7]边燕杰.社会网络与求职过程.国外社会学.1999,4.
[8]边燕杰.找回强连带：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职.转引自.中国社会学（第一卷）.上海：上海人民出版社，2002：245.
[9]张慧玉,杨俊.新企业社会网络特征界定与测度问题探讨——基于效率和效果视角.外国经济与管理,2011,33(11):11~20
[10]张玉利，杨俊，任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界.2008(7):91~102.
[11]杨俊，张玉利，杨晓非，赵英.关系强度、关系资源与新企业绩效——基于行为视角的实证研究.南开管理评论.2009,12(4):44~54.
[12]边燕杰.城市居民社会资本的来源及作用：网络观点与调查发现.中国社会科学.2004,3:136~146
[13]张广利，陈仕中.社会资本理论发展的瓶颈:定义及测量问题探讨.社会科学研究.2006,2:102~106.
[14]罗家德.社会网分析讲义.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[15]赵延东，罗家德.以社会网方法衡量社会资本.见：郭毅，罗家德主编.社会资本与管理学.上海:华东理工大学出版社，2007
[16]何铮，谭劲松，陆园园.组织环境与组织战略关系的文献综述及最新研究动态.北京：管理世界，2006，11：144~151.
[17]蔡莉，崔启国，史琳.创业环境研究框架.吉林大学社会科学学报，2007，47（1）：50~56.
[18]伊查克爱迪斯.赵睿等译.企业生命周期.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[19]樊纲，王小鲁，朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告.北京：经济科学出版社，2010.
[20]徐淑英.科学过程与研究设计.见：陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008
[21]谢家琳.实地研究中的问卷调查法.见：陈晓萍，徐淑英，樊景立主编.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京：北京大学出版社，2008
[22]薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用（第2版）.北京：电子工业出版社，2009
[23]刘军.管理研究方法.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2008:191.
[1] McClelland, D C. The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand,1961.
[2] Collins O, Moore D G, Unwalla, D. The enterprising man, bureau of business and economicresearch, Graduate School of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing,1967.
[3] McCleland D, Winter D G. Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press,1969.
[4] Liles P. Who are the entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics,1974,22:5~14.
[5] Brockhaus R H, Nord W R. An exploration of factors affecting the entrepreneurial decision:personal characteristics vs. environmental Conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Academy of Management,1979.
[6] Zhang, Huiyu. Games in Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility.8th InternationalConference on Service System and Service Management. Tianjin, China,2011.
[7] Komives J L. A preliminary study of the personal values of high technology entrepreneurs. InA. C. Cooper and J. L. Komives (Eds.), Technical Entrepreneurship: A Symposium.Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1972,231-242.
[8] Hull D L, Bosley J J, Udell G G. Reviewing the heffalump: identifying potentialentrepreneurs by personality characteristics. Journal of Small Business Management,1980,18:11~18.
[9] Brockhaus R H. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal,1980,23:509~520.
[10] Palich L E, Bagby D R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking:Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing,1995,10(6):425-438.
[11] Schumpeter J. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress,1934.
[12] Jennings D, Young D. An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measuresof the product innovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice,1990,15(1):53~66.
[13] Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:41~58.
[14] Liang Chyi-lyi, Dunn Paul. Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy?Relationship between entrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial Learning. Academy ofEntrepreneurship Journal,2008,14(1/2):51~73.
[15] Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality,1962,30(1):29~50.
[16] Cole A H. Definition of entrepreneurship. In: Komives J L, Karl A, eds. Bostrom Seminar inthe Study of Enterprise. Milwaukee: Center for Venture Management,1969.10~22.
[17] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venturecreation. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[18] Gartner W B. Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question. American Journal of SmallBusiness,1988,12(4):1~22.
[19] Carland J W, Hoy Frank, Carland Jo Ann C. Who is an entreprneur? is a question worthasking. American Journal of Small Business,1988,12(4):33~39.
[20] Low M B, MacMillan I C. Entrepreneurship: past research and future direction. Journal ofManagement,1988,14(2):139~161.
[21] Davidson P. The Entrepreneurial process as a matching problem. Proceedings of Academy ofManagement Conference, Hawaii, U.S.A.,2005.
[22] Covin J G, Slevin D P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and Benignenvironments. Strategic Management Journal,1989,10(1):75~87.
[23] Romanelli E, Environment and strategies of organization start-up: effect on early survival.Administrative Science Quarterly,1989,34(3):369~387.
[24] Sandberg W, Hofer C W. Improving new venture performance: the role of strategy, industrystructure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing,1987,1:5~28.
[25] Aldrich H E, Fiol C M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation.Academy of Management Review,1994,19(4):645~670.
[26] Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by buildinglegitimacy. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):414~431.
[27] Forbes D P. Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of BusinessVenturing,2005,20(5):623~640.
[28] Busenitz L, Barney J. Entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases andheuristic in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12(1):9~30.
[29] Stevenson H H, Gumpert D E. The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review,1985,85(2):85~94.
[30] Stevenson H H, Jarillo J C. A perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management.Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(1):17~27.
[31] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481~510.
[32] Eisenhardt, Kathleen M, Schoonhoven Claudia Bird. Resource-based view of strategicalliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science.1996,7(2):136~150.
[33] Ahuja Gautam. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formationof interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):317~343.
[34] Katila Riitta, Rosenberger Jeff, Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Swimming with sharks: technologyventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):295~332.
[35] Bates T. Race, self-employment, and upward mobility. Washington, DC: Woodrow WilsonCenter Press,1997.
[36] Hoang H, Young N. Social embeddedness and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition;(more)evidence of embeddedness. Working paper,2000.
[37] Bruderl J, Preisendorfer P. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses.Small Business Economics.1998,10:213~225.
[38] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[39] Hoang Ha, Antoncic Bostjan. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review.Journal of Business Venturing,2003,18(2):165~187.
[40] Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academyof Management Review,2000,25(1):217~226.
[41] Aldrich H, Reese P R. Does networking pay off? A panel study of entrepreneurs in theresearch triangle. In: Churchill, N.S., et al., eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1993:325~339.
[42] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunity recognitionprocess: examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks. Paper presentedat the1999Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[43] Uzzi Brian. The source and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance oforganizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review.1996,61(4):674~698.
[44] Uzzi Brian. Social dtructure and vompetition in interfirm networks: the paradox ofembeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly.1997,42(1):35~67.
[45] Uzzi, Brian. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations andnetworks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review,1999,64(4):p481-505.
[46] Larson, Andrea and Starr, Jennifer A. A network model of organization formation.Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,1993, winter:5-15.
[47] Hite, J. M. The influence of the early firm life cycle on the evolution of entrepreneurialdyadic network ties. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Paper alsoreceived Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Best Conceptual Paper Award,1998.
[48] Hite, Julie M, and Hesterly, William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence toearly growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275–286.
[49] Greve, A, and Salaff, J. W. social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice,2003,27(3):1-22.
[50] Slotte-Kock Susanna, Coviello Nicole. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: areview and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory&Practice,2010,34(1):31~57.
[51] Van de Ven A, Poole M S. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy ofManagement Review,1995,20(3):510~540.
[52] Witt Peter. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship&Regional Development,2004,16:391~412.
[53] Drucker Peter F. The effective executive. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.,1966.
[54] Homans G C. The human group, New York:: Harcourt, Brace&Co.,1950.
[55] Barnes John A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations.1954,7(1):39~58, doi:10.1177/001872675400700102
[56] Barnes John A.. Social networks. Addison-Wesley Module Publications26. Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1972.
[57] Bott Elizabeth. Family and social network.303Park Avenue South, New York: HumanitiesPress,1957.
[58] Mitchell J C. The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell J C. eds. Social networksin urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
[59] White Harrison C, Boorman S, Breiger R. Social structure from mutiple networks, I.blockmodels of roles and positon. American Journal of Sociology,1976,81:732.
[60] White H C. Markets from networks: socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,2002.
[61] Granovetter Mark S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(May):1360~1380.
[62] Burt Ronald S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[63] Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin,1965.
[64] Bourdieu Pierre. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J G. eds. Handbook of theory andresearch for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1986.
[65] Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press,1990.
[66] Putnam Robert D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The AmericanProspect,1993,13(Spring):35~42.
[67] Lin N. Social capital a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,2001.
[68] Flap Henk D, Ed Boxman. Getting started. The influence of social capital on the start of theoccupational career. University of Utrcht, the Netherlands,1996.
[69] Soh Pek-Hooi. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of adominant design.Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(4):438~461.
[70] Shaner Janet, Maznevski Martha. The relationship between networks, institutionaldevelopment, and performance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(5):556~568.
[71] Vissa Balagopal. A matching theory of entrepreneurs' tie formation intentions and initiationof economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal,2011,54(1):137~158.
[72] Aldrich and Zimmer,1986
[73] Freeman J. Venture capital as an economy of time. In: Leenders R Th A J, Gabbay S M eds.Corporate social capital and liability. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing,1999:460~482.
[74] Smeltzer L R, Van Hook B L, Hutt R W. Analysis and use of advisors as information sourcesin venture startups. Journal of Small Business Management,1991,29(3):10~20.
[75] Johannisson B, Alexanderson O, Nowicki K, Senneseth K. Beyond anarchy and organization:entrepreneurs in contextual networks. Entrepreneurship Regional Development,1994,6:329~356.
[76] Brown B, Butler J E. Competitors as allies: a study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.Swine industry. Journal of Small Business Management,1995,33(3):57~66.
[77] Human S E, Provan K G. External resource exchange and perceptions of competitivenesswithin organizational networks: an organizational learning perspective. In: Reynolds P, et al.eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1996:240~252.
[78] Shane Scott, Cable D. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Working paper,2001.
[79] Stuart T E, HoangH, Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance ofentrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):315~349.
[80] Brass D J. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in anorganization. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:518~539.
[81] Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as a distinctiveorganizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(4):317~338.
[82] Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in networks.Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:342~369.
[83] Jones C, Hesterly W S, Borgatti S P. A general theory of network governance: exchangeconditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review.1997,22(4):911~945.
[84] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9:31~41.
[85] Pruitt D G. Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press,1981.
[86] Das T K, Teng B. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation inalliances. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998.23(3):491~512.
[87] Saxenian A. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. ResearchPolicy,1991,20(5):423~437.
[88] Hausler J, Hohn H, Lutz S. Contingencies of innovative networks: a case study of successfulR&D collaboration. Research Policy,1994,23(1):47~66.
[89] Katila R, Mang P Y. Interorganizational development activities: the likelihood and timing ofcontracts. Academy of Management Proceedings,1999, B1–B6.
[90] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: alliance network compositionand startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:267~294.
[91] Hansen E L, Witkowski T H. Entrepreneur involvement in international marketing: theeffects of overseas social networks and self-imposed barriers to action. In: Hill G E, LaForgeR W. eds. Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface,1995:363~367.
[92] Burt R S, Raider H J. Creating careers: women’s paths through entrepreneurship. Workingpaper,2000.
[93] Silverman B S, Baum J A C. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Working paper,2000.
[94] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on companyperformance. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[95] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. StrategicManagement Journal,1991,12, Summer Special Issue:105~124.
[96] Kogut B. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review,1988,Special Issue:39~52.
[97] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependenceperspective. New York: Harper&Row,1978.
[98] Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firmcapabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(5):397~420.
[99] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? AmericanJournal of Sociology,1999,103(March):177~231.
[100] Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of anindustry network. Organization Science,1997,8(2):109~125.
[101] Louis D, Marino Franz T, Lohrke John S, Hill K. Mark weaver and tulus tambunan.Formation intentions in an emerging economy: evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis inIndonesia. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.2008, January:157~183.
[102] Haiyang Li，Atuahene-Gima Kwaku. The adoption of agency business activity, productinnovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal,2002,23:469~490.
[103] Ahuja Gautam, Polidoro Jr. Francisco, Mitchell Will. Structural homophily or socialasymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic ManagementJournal.2009,30:941~958.
[104] Rothaerme Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology:complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[105] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in socialnetworks. Annual Review of Sociology,2001,27:415~444.
[106] Lazarsfeld P F, Merton R K. Friendship as a social process: a substantive andmethodological analysis. In: Berger M. eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. NewYork: Van Nostrand,1954:18~66.
[107] Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? AmericanJournal of Sociology,1999,104(5):1439~1493.
[108] Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships integration and futuredirections. Academy of Management Review,1990,15(2):241~265.
[109] Starr J A, Macmillan I C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisitionstrategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11:79~92.
[110] Miner A S, Amburgey T L, Stearns T M. Interorganizational linkages and populationdynamics: buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4):689~713.
[111] Baum J A C, Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. AdministrativeScience Quarterly,1991,36(2):187~218.
[112] Singh K, Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut downor form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal,1996, Summer Special Issue,17:99~115.
[113] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on companyperformance. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(4):291~309.
[114] Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis ofstructural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. StrategicManagement Journal,2000, Special Issue,21:369~386.
[115] Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. StrategicManagement Journal,1991, Summer Special Issue,12:105~124.
[116] Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N. Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of allianceformation in the automobile industry. paper presented at the SMJ Special Issue Conferenceon Strategic Net-works,1999.
[117] Williamson Oliver. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press,1975.
[118] Ingram P, Roberts P W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry.American Journal of Sociology,2000,106(2):387~423.
[119] Hardin Russell. Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1982.
[120] Montgomery James D. Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. AmericanJournal of Sociology,1998,104:92~125.
[121] Dobbin Frank, Timothy J Dowd. How policy shapes competition: early railroad foundingsin Massachusetts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:501~29.
[122] Baker Wayne E, Robert R Faulkner. The social organization of conspiracy: illegalnetworks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review,1993,58:837~60.
[123] Coleman James S. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap,1990.
[124] Palmer Donald, Jennings P Devereaux, Zhou Xueguang. Late adoption of themultidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: institutional, political and economicaccounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1993,38:100~131.
[125] Dubini P, Aldrich H. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurialprocess. Journal of Business Venturing,1991,6(5):305~313
[126] Jarillo C J. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,1989,9:31~41.
[127] Aldrich H, Rosen B, Woodward W. The impact of social networks on business foundingsand profit: a longitudinal study. In: Churchill N S. et al. eds. Frontiers of EntrepreneurshipResearch,1987:154~168.
[128] Hansen E L. Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship:Theory and Practice.1995,19(4):7~19.
[129] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. New venture growth and personal networks, Journal of BusinessResearch,1996,36:37~50.
[130] Pfeffer Jeffrey. Usefulness of the concept. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds.New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[131] Drucker Peter. The effective executive. NY: Harper&Row Publishers,1966.
[132] Katz Danie, Kahn Robert L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley,1966.
[133] Scott Richard W. Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In: Goodman PaulS, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[134] Ostroff Cheri, Schmitt Neal. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency.The Academy of Management Journal,1993,36(6):1345~1361.
[135] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: GoodmanPaul S, Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[136] Campbell John P. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In: Goodman Paul S,Pennings Johannes M. eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[137] Seashore S E, Yuchtman E. Factorial analysis of organizational performance.Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:377~395.
[138] Yuchtman E, Seashore S E. A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness.American Sociological Review,1967,32:891~903.
[139] Campbell J P, and others. The measurement of organizational effectiveness: a review ofrelevant research and opinion. Final Report,1974, Navy personnel research anddevelopment center contract N00022-73-C-0023. Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions,1974.
[140] Perrow C. Three types of effectiveness studies. In: Goodman Paul S, Pennings Johannes M.eds. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[141] Gist M E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resourcemanagement. Academy of Management Review,1987,12:472~485.
[142] Tsui A S. A multiple-constituency model of effectiveness: an empirical examination at thehuman resource subunit level. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:458~483.
[143] Cameron K. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutes of higher education.Administrative Science Quarterly,1978,23:604~632.
[144] Cameron K S. Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities.Academy of Management Journal,1981,24:25~47.
[145] Cameron K. Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions oforganizational effectiveness. Management Science,1986,32:539~553.
[146] Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J, Long D. Educational productivity council employsmanagement science methods to improve educational quality. Interfaces,1984,14(6):1~8.
[147] Schmitt N, Ostroff C. Pilot study of measurement and model linkages for thecomprehensive assessment of school environments. Reston, VA: National Association ofSecondary School Principals,1987.
[148] Georgopoulos B S, Tannenbaum A S. A study of organizational effectiveness. AmericanSociological Review,1957,22:534~540.
[149] Argyris Chris. Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill:Dorsey Press,1962.
[150] Pennings Johannes M, Goodman Paul S. Toward a workable framework. In: GoodmanPaul S, Pennings Johannes M. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.,1977.
[151] Hite Julie M, Hesterly William S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence toearly growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):275~286.
[152] Zimmer C, Aldrich H. Resource mobilization through ethnic nNetworks: kinship andfriendship ties of shopkeepers in England. Sociological Perspectives,1987,30:422~445.
[153] Gimeno J, Folta T B, Cooper A C, Woo C Y. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial humancapital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42:750~783.
[154] Burt R S. The network structure of social capital. In: Sutton R I, Staw B M. eds. Researchin organizational bBehavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT,2000.
[155] Mahoney T A. Productivity defined: the relativity of efficiency, effectiveness and change.In: Campbell J P, Campbell J R. Associates, productivity in organizations: newperspectives from industrial and organizational psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1988:230~261.
[156] Quinn Robert E, John Rohrbaugh. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards acompeting values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science,1983,29(3):363~377
[157] Jack Sarah L. Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal ofBusiness Venturing,2010,25(1):120~137.
[158] Beckman C M, Haunschild P R, Phillips D J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specificuncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15(3):259~275.
[159] Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor'sperspective.In: Katz J, Brockhaus R. Advances in Entrepreneurship. Greenwich, JAI Press.1997,3:119~138.
[160] Ostgaard T A, Birley S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizationaladvantage. Academy of Management Review,1998,36(1):37~50.
[161] Cowton Christopher J. Corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom. Journal ofBusiness Ethics.1987,6:553~558.
[162] Brammer S J, Millington A I. The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in theUK between1989and1999: industry structure and stakeholder influences. BusinessEthics: A European Review,2003,12(3):216~228.
[163] Saiia D H, Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charitybegins at home. Business and Society,2003,42(2):169~201.
[164] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5:272~280.
[165] Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99~120.
[166] Thompson J D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
[167] Lin N, Ensel W M, Vaughn J C. Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors inoccupational status attainment. American Journal of Sociological Review,1981,46(4):393~405.
[168] Lin Nan. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,2001.
[169] Alder P S, Kwon S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of ManagementReview,2002,27(1):17~40.
[170] Gulati Ranjay. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(4):619~652.
[171] Greve Henrich, Baum Joel A, Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Rowley Timothy. Built to last butfalling apart: cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy ofManagement Journal,2010,53(2):302~322.
[172] Lin Nan. Social resources and instrumental action. In: Marsden P, Lin N. eds. Socialstructure and network analysis. Sage Publications,1982:131~147.
[173] Li Haiyang, Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. The adoption of agency business activity, productinnovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal,2002,23(6):469~490.
[174] Podolny J M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange.Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39(3):458~483.
[175] McEvily B, Zaheer A. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitivecapabilities. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(12):1133~1156.
[176] Coleman J S. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1990.
[177] Rothaermel, Frank T, Boeker Warren. Old technology meets new technology:complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:47~77.
[178] Mitsuhashi Hitoshi, Greve Henrich R. A matching theory of alliance formation andorganizational success: complementary and compatibility. Academy of ManagementJournal,2009,52(5):975~995.
[179] Bian Yanjie. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searchesin China. American Sociological Review,1997,62(3):366~385.
[180] Brush Candida G, Edelman Linda F, Manolova Tatiana S. The effects of initial location,aspirations, and resources on likelihood of first sale in nascent firms. Journal of SmallBusiness Management,2008,46(2):159~182.
[181] Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities.Organizational Science,2000,11,(4):448~469.
[182] Singh R P, Hills G E, Lumpkin G T, Hybels R C. The entrepreneurial opportunityrecognition process: examining the role of self-perceived alertness and social networks.Paper presented at the1999Academy of Management Meeting, Chicago, IL,1999.
[183] Hannan M T, Freeman J H. Structural inertia and organizational change. AmericanSocilogical Review,1984,49(2):149~164.
[184] Miles R E, Snow C C. Fit, failure, and the hall of fame: how companies succeed or fail.New York: Free Press,1994
[185] Lewin A Y, Volberda H W. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research onstrategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science,1999,10(5):519~534.
[186] Tan J, Litschert R J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implication:an empirical study of the Chinese electronic industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1~20.
[187] Tan J, Tan D. Environment-strategy coevolution and co-alignment: a staged model ofChinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26:141~157.
[188] Gartner W B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venturecreation. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696~706.
[189] Austin J, Skillern J W. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2006:1~22.
[190] Young E C, Welsch H P. Major elements in entrepreneu rial development in central mexico.Journal of Small Business Management,1993,(10):80~85.
[191] Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimension of organizational task environment. AdministrativeScience Quaterly,1984,29:52~73.
[192] Tan J. Innovation and risk-takin g in a transitional economy: A comparative study ofChinese managers and entrepren eurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[193] Luo Yadong. Environment-strategy-performance relations in small business in China: Acase of town ship and village enterprises in southern China. Journal of Small BusinessManagement,1999,(1):37~52.
[194] Stinchcombe A L. Organizations and social structure. In: James G March. Eds. Handbookof0rganizations Chicago: Rand-McNally,1965:140~200.
[195] Dubini P, Aldrich H E. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurialprocess, Journal of Business Venturing,1991,6:305~313.
[196] Jarillo J C. Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources, Journal ofBusiness Venturing,1989,4:133~147.
[197] Greiner Larry E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard BusinessReview50,1972:37~46.
[198] Kimberly John R, Miles Robert H, and associates. The organizational life cycle: issues inthe creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1980.
[199] Miller D, Friesen P H. A longitudinal study of the corporate lifecycle. ManagementScience,1984,30(10):1161~1183.
[200] Adizes I. Organizational passages---diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems oforganizations. Organizational Dynamics,1979,8(1):3~25.
[201] Gray B, Ariss S S. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academyof Management Review,1985,10(4):707~723.
[202] Jawahar I M, McLaughlin G L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizationallife cycle approach. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(3):397~414.
[203] Tan Justin. Regulatory environment and strategic organizations in a transitional economy:a study of Chinese private enterprise. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,1996:31~44.
[204] Zahra S, Covin G. Contextual influen ces on the corporate entrepreneur shipperformancerelationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing g,1995,(10):43~58.
[205] Tan J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: a comparative study ofChinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16:359~376.
[206] Lane G. Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust. In: Clane R Bachmann. eds.Trust within and between organizations. New York: Oxford University Press,2002:1~30.
[207] Zucker L G. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920.Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,1986,18:53~111.
[208] Thomas C W. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and theiremployees. Administration&Society,1998,30(5):166~193.
[209] Barney J, Mark H Hansen. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. StrategicJournal of Management,1994,15, Issue Supplement S1:175~190.
[210] Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burt R S, Camerer C. Not so different after all: Across-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review,1998,(23):393~404.
[211] Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? exploring the effects ofinterorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science,1998,(9):141~59.
[212] Zaheer S, Zaheer A. Trust and borders. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,(37):21~29.
[213] Liu S S, Ngo H, Hon A H Y. Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: mediating roles ofinterpersonal and interorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research,2006,59:466~474.
[214] Kuhn T. The structure of scientific evolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1962.
[215] Popper K R. The logic of scientific discovery,2nd ed. New York: Harper,1968.
[216] Wallace W. The logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine,1971.
[217] Churchill G A. A paradigm for developing better measure of marketing constructs. Journalof Marketing Research,1979,16(1):64~73.
[218] Brush C G., Vanderwerf P A. A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimatesof new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1992,7(2):157~170.
[219] Murphy G., Trailer J, Hill R. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journalof Business Research,1996,36(1):15~23.
[220] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venturestrategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[221] Yu Jifeng, Gilbert Brett, Anitra Oviatt, Benjamin M. Effects of alliances, time, andnetwork cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic ManagementJournal.2011,32(4):424~446.
[222] Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-countryinvestigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112（4):1251～1288.
[223] Molina F X, Martínez, M T. Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: how an excessof intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. StrategicManagement Journal,2009,30:1013~1023.
[224] Gorsuch R L. Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1983.
[225] Zahra S, Ireland D, Hitt M. International expansion by new venture firms: internationaldiversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy ofManagement Journal,2000,43:925~950.
[226] McDougall P Phillips, Shane S, Oviatt B M. Explaining the formation of international newventures: the limits of theories from international business researchJournal of businessventuring,1994,9(6):469~487.
[227] Rea L, Parker R. Design and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher,1992.
[228] Chandler G N, Hanks S H. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venturestrategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing,1994,9(4):331~349.
[229] Porter M E. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors,New York: Free Press,1980.
[230] Porter M E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, NewYork: Free Press,1985.
[231] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in socialnetworks. Annual Review of Sociology,2001,27:415~444.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |