企业国际化、动态能力与创新绩效关系研究
|
摘要
在知识经济时代,开放式创新成为了决定企业创新成败的关键。企业仅仅依赖内部资源开展创新活动已日趋困难。国际化成为了我国企业快速实现创新追赶的一种重要的开放式创新战略。通过进入国际市场,企业能够在全球范围内搜索创新所需的资源和知识,学习国际先进的技术知识和管理经验,从而克服企业创新所面临的资源和制度瓶颈,利用国际创新源提升企业创新能力。然而,目前已有文献对于国际化与创新关系的研究主要基于传统的资源观和组织学习理论剖析企业国际化对创新的直接影响,并没有打开企业国际化影响创新的中间黑箱；同时,已有研究主要关注企业是否国际化与创新的关系,并且将企业看成被动的消化吸收者,忽略了表征企业消化吸收能力的典型特征在国际化过程中的重要作用；此外,已有研究情景主要集中于发达国家,对于中国制造企业国际化研究较少。
在此背景下,本研究立足于战略管理、国际商务、经济学中关于国际化的已有研究,以中国制造企业为研究对象,详细阐释了“企业国际化如何影响创新绩效”这一核心问题。具体地,本研究以国际化程度和国际化模式作为表征企业国际化特征的变量,基于动态能力视角深入剖析了国际化程度对创新绩效的作用机制,以及出口和对外直接投资这两种国际化模式对创新绩效的作用机制。本研究主要围绕以下几个部分展开：
(1)文献综述和理论发展。通过对战略管理、国际商务和经济学领域关于国际化影响创新的理论综述,企业国际化实证研究综述,以及动态能力研究综述,找出了现有研究的理论缺口。分析界定了国际化程度、国际化模式、动态能力等关键变量的概念及其要素构成,为本研究分析框架的构建提供了一个理论支撑平台。
(2)探索性案例研究。选取4个案例开展深入的探索性案例研究。经过理论预设、案例选择、数据收集、案例内分析和多案例之间的比较研究,推导出关于国际化程度和国际化模式、动态能力与创新绩效关系的初始研究命题,为后续研究提供了源于实践的构想。
(3)企业国际化程度和国际化模式与创新绩效关系的理论模型与实证检验。在探索性案例研究的基础上,结合现有理论研究更深层次的探讨,分别提出了国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效直接影响和间接影响的细化假设。通过179家中国制造企业的调查问卷,运用层次回归分析和结构方程建模的方法进行了实证研究,进一步阐明了国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效的影响、内在作用机制以及表征企业消化吸收能力特征指标的调节效应。
基于以上研究论证工作,本文主要得出了以下结论：
(1)企业国际化对创新绩效具有正向影响。具体来说,企业国际化程度对创新绩效有显著正向影响；不同国际化模式(出口和对外直接投资)对创新绩效均具有显著正向影响；研究还发现,相比出口,对外直接投资对企业创新绩效的促进作用较大。
(2)企业国际化对创新绩效的作用受到企业对海外知识消化吸收能力的调节作用。实证研究表明,跨国公司入股、国际化经验对国际化程度与创新绩效之间的关系具有正向调节作用;跨国公司入股、国际化经验对出口和对外直接投资与创新绩效之间的关系具有正向调节作用。国际化只是为企业学习和获取国外知识提供了机会,然而国际化促进企业创新的效应必然还取决于企业对国外营销和技术知识的消化吸收能力。
(3)企业国际化对创新绩效有直接作用,同时通过动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力)间接作用于创新绩效。本文的实证研究表明,国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效有直接正向效应；同时国际化程度和国际化模式还通过正向作用于企业动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力),进而提高创新绩效。研究还发现,相比出口,对外直接投资更能够促进企业动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力)的提升。
上述研究结论深化了国际化对企业创新作用过程的理解,使得本研究具有了一定的探索意义。具体而言,本研究在以下三个方面进行了深化和拓展：
(1)打开了国际化影响企业创新绩效的中间机制。学者们基于传统的资源观和组织学习理论研究了国际化对企业创新的直接影响,认为企业通过国际化获取了创新所需的互补资源,通过组织学习获取了创新所需的技术和知识,最终提升了企业的创新绩效。然而,传统的资源观和组织学习理论对于解释国际化影响企业创新绩效的机理存在缺陷。首先,资源观和组织学习理论只是阐释了国际化能够为企业带来创新所需的互补资源、技术和知识,并没有阐释资源和知识转化为创新绩效的中间机理。其次,传统的资源观和组织学习理论不能很好地回答在动态竞争的环境下,通过国际化获取的资源和知识如何能够持续提高企业创新绩效。本研究基于动态能力视角,认为国际化之所以能够提升企业创新绩效,是因为国际化提升了企业整合内外部资源应对动态竞争环境的能力,认为企业国际化部分通过影响企业机会识别能力和机会利用能力进而影响企业创新绩效。因此,本研究对国际化影响企业创新绩效作用机制的研究做了有益的补充。
(2)拓展了国际化影响企业创新绩效的理论边界。首先,国际商务和经济学领域学者大多只是简单分析了“是否国际化”对企业创新绩效的影响。本研究关注国际化程度和不同国际化模式对企业创新绩效的影响机制,因而弥补了先前研究将国际化行为看成是同质性知识流动的缺陷；其次,国际商务和经济学领域学者大多采用计量经济的研究方法,将国际化企业看成是被动的消化吸收者。本文基于消化吸收能力理论引入情境因素,发现企业国际化程度和国际化模式对创新绩效的影响因跨国公司入股、国际化经验而不同。这一研究发现增添了对企业国际化如何作用于企业创新边界条件的理论解释,有助于未来研究进一步探索企业国际化影响创新绩效的内在机理。最后,目前对于国际化与创新绩效关系的研究主要集中于发达国家,本文在中国制造企业情境下对企业国际化程度和国际化模式与创新绩效的关系进行了检验,因而能够进一步拓展国际化与创新关系的理论边界。
(3)丰富了动态能力的相关研究。首先,目前对于动态能力的研究主要集中于动态能力的内涵与外延的探讨,对于动态能力的实证研究较少。本研究丰富了动态能力前因的研究,探讨了企业国际化行为对企业动态能力的影响,具体表现为国际化程度和不同的国际化模式对动态能力的影响；同时深化了动态能力后果的研究,探索了动态能力对企业创新的影响效应。其次,已有研究大多将动态能力视为单维构念来对待,本研究基于整合能力的视角将动态能力作为合并型多维构念来研究,将动态能力划分为机会识别能力和机会利用能力。
In the era of knowledge economy, open innovation is significantly vital for enterprises to innovate. Enterprises only relying on internal resources to develop innovation activities have become increasingly difficult. Internationalization is an important open innovation strategy for our manufacturing enterprises to fastly catch up. Through entering the international market, enterprises can search necessary innovation resources and knowledge in the global scope, learn the advanced international technical knowledge and management experience which can help enterprises overcome resources and institution bottleneck, and at last promote the enterprises" innovation capability. However, existing literatures mainly explore the direct influence of internationalization on innovation based on the resource-based view and organizational learning theory, and do not uncover the intermediate process. Among the little research on the direct relatiosnhip between internationalization and innovation, it mainly explores the relatiosnhip between whether the enterprise internationalizes and innovates, ignore the heterogeneity of internationalization, and also take the enterprises as passive recipients. Except that, the research situation mainly focuses on enterprises in developed countries, with less attention left for Chinese manufacturing enterprises.
In view of this, based on the dynamic capability theory, we carry out the study exploring how internationalization promotes Chinese manufacturing enterprises' innovation at the basis of internationalization research in strategic management, international business and economics. Specifically, this study uses degree of internationalization and internationalization mode as the characteristic variable to describe internationalization heterogeneity, and respectively explores the impact of degree of internationalization on innovation performance, and the impact of export and foreign direct investment on innovation performance in depth. This research mainly focuses on the following several aspects:
(1) Through reviewing of the theoretical basis of the impact of internationalization on innovation, the empirical research about the consequence of internationalization in the field of strategic management, international business and economics, and research about dynamic capability, we find research gaps in the existing research. Except that, we define the concept of degree of internationalization, internationalization mode, dynamic capability which are important for the research in the next stage.
(2) Four typical cases are chosen for the explorative cases research. Through theoretical presumption, data collection, within-case analysis and comparison among cases, preliminary researeh issues are put forward about the relationship between degree of internationalization, internationalization mode, dynamic capability and innovation performance, which provides a construct for futuxe research.
(3) Based on explorative cases research mentioned above and in-depth theoretical analysis, we put forward the empirical model about how degree of internationalization and internationalization mode respectively influence innovation performance. The hypothesises are tested using a sample of179Chinese manufacturing firms.
This dissertation comes to the following main conclusions based on the above-mentioned analysis:
(1) Internationalization is benefical for firm's innovation. Specifically, the degree of internationalization has positive impact on firm's innovation performance and two kinds of internationalization mode including export and outward foreign direct investment have positive impact on firm's innovation performance. Except that, the findings show that outward foreign direct investment has greater impact on innovation performance than export.
(2) The effect of internationalization on innovation performance is influenced by firm's absorptive ability for overseas knowledge. The empirical research shows that multinational corporation's participation and international experience positively and significantly impact the relationaship between the degree of internationalization and innovation performance, and internationalization mode and innovation performance. The findings show that internationalization just provides an opportunity for firms to get and learn overseas knowledge, but the final effect also depends on firm's absorptive ability.
(3) Internationalization can influence innovation performance directly and indirectly. The empirical research shows that the degree of internationalization has direct and positive impact on firm's innovation performance, and also has indirect and positive effect on innovation performance derived through the mediating role of dynamic capability, including opportunity recognition capability and opportunity exploitation capability. The empirical research also shows that two kinds of internationalization mode including export and outward foreign direct investment have direct and positive effect on innovation performance, and also have indirect and positive effect on innovation performance derived through the mediating role of dynamic capability, including opportunity recognition capability and opportunity exploitation capability. Except that, the findings show that outward foreign direct investment has greater impact on innovation performance than export.
By employing an integrative, multidisciplinary approach, this dissertation tries to make some innovation in the following fields:
(1) This paper explores the intermediary process between internationalization and innovation performance. Based on the resource-based view and organizational learning theory, researchers have explored the direct influence of internationalization on firm's innovation. It argues that firms obtain complementary resources and learning opportunities in the international markets which finally would enhance firms' innovation performance. However, the resource-based view and organizational learning theory both have been rightly criticized for having two crucial flaws. On the one hand, they both do not explain the transformation process of strategic asset or resources into innovation performance. On the other hand, they both do not explain how strategic resources or learning opportunities sustainably enhance firms' innovation performance under dynamic competitive environment. Based on the dynamic capability theory, we argue that the reason why internationalization promotes firm's innovation performance is that internationalization enhances firm's ability to integrate inside and outside resources to cope with dynamic environment. Specifically, internationalization can influence innovation performance through the impact on opportunity recognition ability and opportunity exploitation ability. Therefore, this study enriches the research on the mechanism about how internationalization can influence innovation performance.
(2) This paper expands the theoretical boundary about how internationalization influences innovation performance. Firstly, researchers in the field of international business and economics mostly explore the relationship between whether or not firms internationalize and innovation. However, we focus on the degree of internationalization, internationalization mode which reflects the heterogeneity of internationalization. Secondly, international business and economics scholars mostly using econometric research method and treat international enterprises as a passive absorber. In our study, we find that the learning process also depends on firm's R&D investment intensity, multinational corporation's participation and international experience. This finding adds the theoretical boundary to the relationship between internationalization and innovation performance. Finally, mostly of the research on the relationship between internationalization and innovation performance focuses on developed countries, with less attention paid to developing countries. Our research on Chinese manufacturing firms can enrich the research context.
(3) This paper contributes to the study in the research field of dynamic capability. Firstly, most of the research on dynamic capability focus on the discussion of the connotation and extension of dynamic capability, with less attention on the empirical research presently. This study enriches the research on the antecedents and consequences of dynamic capability. Secondly, most of the research treats dynamic capability as a kind of single dimension variable which in fact is not suitable. In our study, we treats dynamic capability as a kind of two-dimension variable based on the view of integrative capacity, and seperates it into opportunity recognition ability and opportunity exploitation ability.
在此背景下,本研究立足于战略管理、国际商务、经济学中关于国际化的已有研究,以中国制造企业为研究对象,详细阐释了“企业国际化如何影响创新绩效”这一核心问题。具体地,本研究以国际化程度和国际化模式作为表征企业国际化特征的变量,基于动态能力视角深入剖析了国际化程度对创新绩效的作用机制,以及出口和对外直接投资这两种国际化模式对创新绩效的作用机制。本研究主要围绕以下几个部分展开：
(1)文献综述和理论发展。通过对战略管理、国际商务和经济学领域关于国际化影响创新的理论综述,企业国际化实证研究综述,以及动态能力研究综述,找出了现有研究的理论缺口。分析界定了国际化程度、国际化模式、动态能力等关键变量的概念及其要素构成,为本研究分析框架的构建提供了一个理论支撑平台。
(2)探索性案例研究。选取4个案例开展深入的探索性案例研究。经过理论预设、案例选择、数据收集、案例内分析和多案例之间的比较研究,推导出关于国际化程度和国际化模式、动态能力与创新绩效关系的初始研究命题,为后续研究提供了源于实践的构想。
(3)企业国际化程度和国际化模式与创新绩效关系的理论模型与实证检验。在探索性案例研究的基础上,结合现有理论研究更深层次的探讨,分别提出了国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效直接影响和间接影响的细化假设。通过179家中国制造企业的调查问卷,运用层次回归分析和结构方程建模的方法进行了实证研究,进一步阐明了国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效的影响、内在作用机制以及表征企业消化吸收能力特征指标的调节效应。
基于以上研究论证工作,本文主要得出了以下结论：
(1)企业国际化对创新绩效具有正向影响。具体来说,企业国际化程度对创新绩效有显著正向影响；不同国际化模式(出口和对外直接投资)对创新绩效均具有显著正向影响；研究还发现,相比出口,对外直接投资对企业创新绩效的促进作用较大。
(2)企业国际化对创新绩效的作用受到企业对海外知识消化吸收能力的调节作用。实证研究表明,跨国公司入股、国际化经验对国际化程度与创新绩效之间的关系具有正向调节作用;跨国公司入股、国际化经验对出口和对外直接投资与创新绩效之间的关系具有正向调节作用。国际化只是为企业学习和获取国外知识提供了机会,然而国际化促进企业创新的效应必然还取决于企业对国外营销和技术知识的消化吸收能力。
(3)企业国际化对创新绩效有直接作用,同时通过动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力)间接作用于创新绩效。本文的实证研究表明,国际化程度和国际化模式对企业创新绩效有直接正向效应；同时国际化程度和国际化模式还通过正向作用于企业动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力),进而提高创新绩效。研究还发现,相比出口,对外直接投资更能够促进企业动态能力(机会识别能力和机会利用能力)的提升。
上述研究结论深化了国际化对企业创新作用过程的理解,使得本研究具有了一定的探索意义。具体而言,本研究在以下三个方面进行了深化和拓展：
(1)打开了国际化影响企业创新绩效的中间机制。学者们基于传统的资源观和组织学习理论研究了国际化对企业创新的直接影响,认为企业通过国际化获取了创新所需的互补资源,通过组织学习获取了创新所需的技术和知识,最终提升了企业的创新绩效。然而,传统的资源观和组织学习理论对于解释国际化影响企业创新绩效的机理存在缺陷。首先,资源观和组织学习理论只是阐释了国际化能够为企业带来创新所需的互补资源、技术和知识,并没有阐释资源和知识转化为创新绩效的中间机理。其次,传统的资源观和组织学习理论不能很好地回答在动态竞争的环境下,通过国际化获取的资源和知识如何能够持续提高企业创新绩效。本研究基于动态能力视角,认为国际化之所以能够提升企业创新绩效,是因为国际化提升了企业整合内外部资源应对动态竞争环境的能力,认为企业国际化部分通过影响企业机会识别能力和机会利用能力进而影响企业创新绩效。因此,本研究对国际化影响企业创新绩效作用机制的研究做了有益的补充。
(2)拓展了国际化影响企业创新绩效的理论边界。首先,国际商务和经济学领域学者大多只是简单分析了“是否国际化”对企业创新绩效的影响。本研究关注国际化程度和不同国际化模式对企业创新绩效的影响机制,因而弥补了先前研究将国际化行为看成是同质性知识流动的缺陷；其次,国际商务和经济学领域学者大多采用计量经济的研究方法,将国际化企业看成是被动的消化吸收者。本文基于消化吸收能力理论引入情境因素,发现企业国际化程度和国际化模式对创新绩效的影响因跨国公司入股、国际化经验而不同。这一研究发现增添了对企业国际化如何作用于企业创新边界条件的理论解释,有助于未来研究进一步探索企业国际化影响创新绩效的内在机理。最后,目前对于国际化与创新绩效关系的研究主要集中于发达国家,本文在中国制造企业情境下对企业国际化程度和国际化模式与创新绩效的关系进行了检验,因而能够进一步拓展国际化与创新关系的理论边界。
(3)丰富了动态能力的相关研究。首先,目前对于动态能力的研究主要集中于动态能力的内涵与外延的探讨,对于动态能力的实证研究较少。本研究丰富了动态能力前因的研究,探讨了企业国际化行为对企业动态能力的影响,具体表现为国际化程度和不同的国际化模式对动态能力的影响；同时深化了动态能力后果的研究,探索了动态能力对企业创新的影响效应。其次,已有研究大多将动态能力视为单维构念来对待,本研究基于整合能力的视角将动态能力作为合并型多维构念来研究,将动态能力划分为机会识别能力和机会利用能力。
In the era of knowledge economy, open innovation is significantly vital for enterprises to innovate. Enterprises only relying on internal resources to develop innovation activities have become increasingly difficult. Internationalization is an important open innovation strategy for our manufacturing enterprises to fastly catch up. Through entering the international market, enterprises can search necessary innovation resources and knowledge in the global scope, learn the advanced international technical knowledge and management experience which can help enterprises overcome resources and institution bottleneck, and at last promote the enterprises" innovation capability. However, existing literatures mainly explore the direct influence of internationalization on innovation based on the resource-based view and organizational learning theory, and do not uncover the intermediate process. Among the little research on the direct relatiosnhip between internationalization and innovation, it mainly explores the relatiosnhip between whether the enterprise internationalizes and innovates, ignore the heterogeneity of internationalization, and also take the enterprises as passive recipients. Except that, the research situation mainly focuses on enterprises in developed countries, with less attention left for Chinese manufacturing enterprises.
In view of this, based on the dynamic capability theory, we carry out the study exploring how internationalization promotes Chinese manufacturing enterprises' innovation at the basis of internationalization research in strategic management, international business and economics. Specifically, this study uses degree of internationalization and internationalization mode as the characteristic variable to describe internationalization heterogeneity, and respectively explores the impact of degree of internationalization on innovation performance, and the impact of export and foreign direct investment on innovation performance in depth. This research mainly focuses on the following several aspects:
(1) Through reviewing of the theoretical basis of the impact of internationalization on innovation, the empirical research about the consequence of internationalization in the field of strategic management, international business and economics, and research about dynamic capability, we find research gaps in the existing research. Except that, we define the concept of degree of internationalization, internationalization mode, dynamic capability which are important for the research in the next stage.
(2) Four typical cases are chosen for the explorative cases research. Through theoretical presumption, data collection, within-case analysis and comparison among cases, preliminary researeh issues are put forward about the relationship between degree of internationalization, internationalization mode, dynamic capability and innovation performance, which provides a construct for futuxe research.
(3) Based on explorative cases research mentioned above and in-depth theoretical analysis, we put forward the empirical model about how degree of internationalization and internationalization mode respectively influence innovation performance. The hypothesises are tested using a sample of179Chinese manufacturing firms.
This dissertation comes to the following main conclusions based on the above-mentioned analysis:
(1) Internationalization is benefical for firm's innovation. Specifically, the degree of internationalization has positive impact on firm's innovation performance and two kinds of internationalization mode including export and outward foreign direct investment have positive impact on firm's innovation performance. Except that, the findings show that outward foreign direct investment has greater impact on innovation performance than export.
(2) The effect of internationalization on innovation performance is influenced by firm's absorptive ability for overseas knowledge. The empirical research shows that multinational corporation's participation and international experience positively and significantly impact the relationaship between the degree of internationalization and innovation performance, and internationalization mode and innovation performance. The findings show that internationalization just provides an opportunity for firms to get and learn overseas knowledge, but the final effect also depends on firm's absorptive ability.
(3) Internationalization can influence innovation performance directly and indirectly. The empirical research shows that the degree of internationalization has direct and positive impact on firm's innovation performance, and also has indirect and positive effect on innovation performance derived through the mediating role of dynamic capability, including opportunity recognition capability and opportunity exploitation capability. The empirical research also shows that two kinds of internationalization mode including export and outward foreign direct investment have direct and positive effect on innovation performance, and also have indirect and positive effect on innovation performance derived through the mediating role of dynamic capability, including opportunity recognition capability and opportunity exploitation capability. Except that, the findings show that outward foreign direct investment has greater impact on innovation performance than export.
By employing an integrative, multidisciplinary approach, this dissertation tries to make some innovation in the following fields:
(1) This paper explores the intermediary process between internationalization and innovation performance. Based on the resource-based view and organizational learning theory, researchers have explored the direct influence of internationalization on firm's innovation. It argues that firms obtain complementary resources and learning opportunities in the international markets which finally would enhance firms' innovation performance. However, the resource-based view and organizational learning theory both have been rightly criticized for having two crucial flaws. On the one hand, they both do not explain the transformation process of strategic asset or resources into innovation performance. On the other hand, they both do not explain how strategic resources or learning opportunities sustainably enhance firms' innovation performance under dynamic competitive environment. Based on the dynamic capability theory, we argue that the reason why internationalization promotes firm's innovation performance is that internationalization enhances firm's ability to integrate inside and outside resources to cope with dynamic environment. Specifically, internationalization can influence innovation performance through the impact on opportunity recognition ability and opportunity exploitation ability. Therefore, this study enriches the research on the mechanism about how internationalization can influence innovation performance.
(2) This paper expands the theoretical boundary about how internationalization influences innovation performance. Firstly, researchers in the field of international business and economics mostly explore the relationship between whether or not firms internationalize and innovation. However, we focus on the degree of internationalization, internationalization mode which reflects the heterogeneity of internationalization. Secondly, international business and economics scholars mostly using econometric research method and treat international enterprises as a passive absorber. In our study, we find that the learning process also depends on firm's R&D investment intensity, multinational corporation's participation and international experience. This finding adds the theoretical boundary to the relationship between internationalization and innovation performance. Finally, mostly of the research on the relationship between internationalization and innovation performance focuses on developed countries, with less attention paid to developing countries. Our research on Chinese manufacturing firms can enrich the research context.
(3) This paper contributes to the study in the research field of dynamic capability. Firstly, most of the research on dynamic capability focus on the discussion of the connotation and extension of dynamic capability, with less attention on the empirical research presently. This study enriches the research on the antecedents and consequences of dynamic capability. Secondly, most of the research treats dynamic capability as a kind of single dimension variable which in fact is not suitable. In our study, we treats dynamic capability as a kind of two-dimension variable based on the view of integrative capacity, and seperates it into opportunity recognition ability and opportunity exploitation ability.
引文
[1]Agarwal, S.,& Ramaswami, S. Choice of foreign market entry model:Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International business Studies,1992,23(1),1-19.
[2]Aggarwal, R., Berrill, J., Hutson, E.,& Kearney, C. What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality. International Business Review,2011,20(5),557-577.
[3]Alegre, J.,& Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance:An empirical test. Technovation,2008,28(6), 315-326.
[4]Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R.,& Chiva, R. A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management,2006,9(4),333-346.
[5]Alvarez, R.,& Robertson, R. Exposure to foreign markets and plant-level innovation:Evidence from Chile and Mexico. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development,2004,13(1),57-87.
[6]Ambrosini, V.,& Bowman, C. What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews,2009,11(1),29-49.
[7]Amendolagine, V., Capolupo, R.,& Petragallo. N. Export status and performance in a panel of Italian manufacturing firms. (S.E.R.I.E.S Working Paper No.0027). Dipartomento di Scienze Economiche, Universita' degli Studi Bari.2010.
[8]Amsden, A. H. Asia's next giant:South korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.1989.
[9]Andersen, O. Internationalization and market entry mode:A review of theories and conceptual frameworks. Management International Review,1997,37(2), 27-42.
[10]Anderson, E.,& Gatignon, H. Modes of foreign entry:A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies,1986,17(3),1-26.
[11]Annavarjula, M.,& Beldona, S. Multinationality-performance relationship:A review and reconceptualization. The international journal of organizational analysis,2000,8(1),48-67.
[12]Argyres, N. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(2),129-150.
[13]Argyris. C.,& Schon, D. A. Organization learning. London:Addison-Wesley, 1978.
[14]Argyris, C. Learning and teaching:A theory of action perspectives. Journal of Management Education.1997,21(1),9-26.
[15]Arnold, J. M.,& Hussinger, K. Export behavior and firm productivity in german manufacturing:A firm-level analysis. Review of World Economics/ Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,2005,14(2),219-243.
[16]Arthurs, J. D.,& Busenitz, L. W. Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists. Journal of business venturing,2006,21(2), 195-215.
[17]Aw, B.-Y., Chung, S.,& Roberts, M. J. Productivity and turnover in the export market:Micro evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. World Bank Economic Review,2000,14 (1),65-90.
[18]Balachandra, R.,& Friar, J. H. Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation:A contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,1997,44(3),276-287.
[19]Baldwin, J. R.,& Gu, W. Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics,2003, 36 (3),634-657.
[20]Barkema, H. G.,& Vermeulen, F. International expansion through start-up or acquisition:A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal,1998, 41(1),7-26.
[21]Barney, J. B. Strategic factor markets:Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science,1986,32(10),1231-1241.
[22]Barney, J. Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17(1),99-12.
[23]Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management,1991,17(1),99-120.
[24]Barreto, I. Dynamic capabilities:a review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of management,2010,36(1),256-280.
[25]Bell, M.,& Pavitt, K. L. R. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change,1993,2(2),157-210.
[26]Bernard, A. B.,& Jensen, J. B. Exceptional exporter performance:Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics,1999,47 (1),1-26.
[27]Bernard, A. B.,& Jensen, J. B. Exporting and productivity in the USA. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004,20(3),343-357.
[28]Blalock, G.,& Gertler, P. Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics,2004,75(2),397-416.
[29]Bollen, K. A.,& Long, J. S. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.1993.
[30]Bowen, H. P. The empirics of multinationality and performance. In A. M. Rugman (Ed.), Regional aspects of multinationality and performance.2007,13, 113-142. San Diego:JAI Press.
[31]Brock, D. M.,& Yaffe, T. International diversification and performance:The mediating role of implementation. International Business Review,2008,17(5), 600-615.
[32]Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H.,& Zheng, P. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(4),499-518.
[33]Calori, R., Johnson, G.,& Sarnin, P. CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(6),437-457.
[34]Capar, N.,& Kotabe, M. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies,2003, 34(4),345-355.
[35]Castellani, D.,& Zanfei, A. Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy,2007,30(1),156-176.
[36]Caves, R. E. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1982.
[37]Cepeda, G.,& Vera, D. Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities:A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research,2007,60(5), 426-437.
[38]Chang, J. International expansion path, speed, product diversification and performance among emerging-market MNEs:Evidence from Asia-Pacific multinational companies. Asian Business & Management,2007,6(4),331-353.
[39]Chang, S. C.,& Wang, C. F. The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business,2007,42(1),61-79.
[40]Chang, S. J. International expansion strategy of Japanese firms:Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(2), 383-393.
[41]Chari, M. D. R., Devaraj, S.,& David, P. International diversification and firm performance:Role of information technology investments. Journal of World Business,2007,42(2),184-197.
[42]Chen, T.-J.,& Ku, Y.-H. The effect of foreign direct investment on firm growth: The case of Taiwan's manufacturers. Japan and the World Economy,2000,12(2), 153-172.
[43]Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation:The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,2003.
[44]Chiang, Y. C.,& Yu, T. H. The relationship between multinationality and the performance of taiwan firms. Journal of American Academy of Business,2005, (3),130-134.
[45]Child, J.,& Rodrigues, S. B. The internationalization of Chinese firms:A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review,2005,1(3), 381-410.
[46]Clerides, S. K., Lach, S.,& Tybout, J. R. Is learning-by-exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,113 (3),903-948.
[47]Coe, D.,& Helpman, E. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review,1995,39(5),859-887.
[48]Cohen, W. M.,& Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1),128-152.
[49]Collis, D. J. How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(S1),143-152.
[50]Connolly, M. North-South technological diffusion:A new case for dynamic gains from trade. Duke University, Department of Economics Working Papers No. 99-08.2000.
[51]Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V.,& Kundu, S. K. Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance:The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business,2007,42 (4),401-417.
[52]Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K.,& Hsu, C-C. A three-stage theory of international expansion:The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(1),5-18.
[53]Cooper, R. G.,& Kleinschmidt, E. J. Resource allocation in the new product process. Industrial Marketing Management,1988,17(3),249-262.
[54]Cooper, R. G. Overall corporate strategies for new product development. Industrial Marketing Management,1985,14(3),179-193.
[55]Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J. D.,& Slaughter, M. J. Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11479 Cambridge, MA,2005.
[56]Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W.,& White, R. E. An organizational learning framework:From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review.1999, 24(3),522-537.
[57]Daft, R. L.,& Weick, K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation system. Academy of Management Review.1984,9(2),284-295.
[58]Damijan, J. P., Polanec, S.,& Prasnikar, J. Outward FDI and productivity: Micro-evidence from Slovenia. The World Economy,2007,30 (1),135-155.
[59]Daniels, J. D.,& Bracker, J. Profit performance:Do foreign operations make a difference? Management International Review,1989,29(1),46-56.
[60]Danneels, E. Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(5),519-543.
[61]Danneels, E. The Dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(12),1095-1121.
[62]Delios, A.,& Beamish, P. W. Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(8),711-721.
[63]Delios, A., Gaur, A. S.,& Makino, S. The timing of international expansion: Information, rivalry and imitation among Japanese firms,1980-2002. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(1),169-195.
[64]Delmas, M. A. Innovating against European rigidities:Institutional environment and dynamic capabilities. Journal of High Technology Management,2002,13(1), 19-43.
[65]Deng, P. Outward investment by Chinese MNCs:Motivations and implications. Business Horizons,2004,47(3),8-16.
[66]Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K.,& Yost, K. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance,2002,57(5),1951-1961.
[67]Dibrell, C., Davis, P. S.,& Danskin, P. The influence of internationalization on time-based competition. Management International Review,2005,45(2), 173-195.
[68]Dieriekx, I.,& Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science,1989,35(12),1504-1511.
[69]Dixon, M. N. Organizational learning cycle:How we can learn collectively. New York:McGraw-HIll,1994.
[70]Dougherty, D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science,1992,3(2),179-202.
[7I]D(?)ving, E.,& Gooderham, P. N. Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification:The case of small firm accountancy practices. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(8),841-857.
[72]Drnevich, P. L.,& Kriauciunas. A. P. Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(3).254-279.
[73]Dunning, J. H. International production and the multinational enterprises. London: Allen and Unwin,1981.
[74]Dunning, J. H. The eclectic (oli) paradigm of international production:Past, present and future. International Journal of the economics of business,2001,8(2), 173-19.
[75]Eckert, S., Dittfeld. M., Muche, T.,& Rassler, S. Does multinationality lead to value enhancement? An empirical examination of publicly listed corporations from Germany. International Business Review,2010,19 (6),562-574.
[76]Eisenhardt, K. M.,& Martin, J. A. Dynamic capabilities:What are they? Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10/11),1105-1121.
[77]Eisenhardt, K. M. Building theory from case study. Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4),532-550.
[78]Elango B.,& Pattnaik C. Building capabilities for international operations through networks:A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(4),541-555.
[79]Enkel, E., Gassmann, O.,& Chesbrough H. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management,2009,39(4),311-316.
[80]Errunza, V. R.,& Senbet, L. W. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. Journal of Finance,1984,39(3),727-737.
[81]Fatemi, A. M. Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification. Journal of Finance,1984,39(5),1325-1344.
[82]Ferna'ndez, Z.,& Nieto, M. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,37(3), 340-351.
[83]Filatotchev, I.,& Piesse, J. R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms:European evidence. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(8), 1260-1276.
[84]Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T.,& Wright, M. The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets:The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(6),1005-1021.
[85]Fiol, C. M.,& Lyles, M. A. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review.1985,10(4),803-813.
[86]Fisch, J. H.,& Zschoche, M. Do firms benefit from multinationality through production shifting? Journal of International Management,2011,17(2),143-149.
[87]Fisch, J. H. Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm. Research Policy,2003,32(8),1381-1396.
[88]Fowler, F. J. Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage,1988.
[89]Fryges, H.,& Wagner, J. Exports and profitability:First evidence for German manufacturing firms. The World Economy,2010,33(3),399-423.
[90]Fulmer, R. M. A model for the way organizational learn. Planning Review,1994, 22(3),20-24.
[91]Gareth, M.,& Rafael, R. Action Learning:A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Social Change. Human Relations.1984,37(1):1-28.
[92]Gaur, A. S.,& Kumar, V. International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance:Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management,2009,20(2),172-186.
[93]Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W.,& DaCosta, R. C. Diversification strategy and internationalization:Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal,1989,10(2),109-119.
[94]Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S.,& Olsen, D. M. Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(1),51-80.
[95]Gherardi, S.,& Nicolini, D. The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management,2000,9(1),7-18.
[96]Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P.,& Zedeck, S. Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. New York:Freeman, San Franeisco, CA,1981.
[97]Ghoshal, S. Global strategy:An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal,1987,8(5),425-440.
[98]Gibson, C. B.,& Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal,2004, 47(2),209-226.
[99]Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago:Aldine, 1967.
[100]Goerzen, A.,& Beamish, P. Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(13),1289-1306.
[101]Golovko, E.,& Valentini, G. Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs'growth. Journal of International Business Studies,2011,42(3),362-380.
[102]Gomes, L.,& Ramaswamy, K. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies,1999,30(1),173-188.
[103]Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J.,& Terrell, K. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 14481 Cambridge, MA,2008.
[104]Grant, R. M. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies,1987,18(3),79-89.
[105]Grant, R. M., Jamine, A. P.,& Thomas, H. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies,1972-1984. Academy of Management Journal,1988,31(4),771-781.
[106]Grazzi, M. Export and firm performance:Evidence on productivity and profitability of Italian companies. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2012,12(4),413-444.
[107]Greenaway, D.,& Kneller, R. Exporting and productivity in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004,20(3),358-371.
[108]Greenaway, D.,& Yu, Z. Firm level interactions between exporting and productivity:Industry specific evidence, Research Paper Series No.1. Leverhulme Centre, Nottingham University.2004.
[109]Griffith, D. A.,& Harvey, M. G. A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies,2001,32(3),597-606.
[110]Grossman, G.,& Helpman, E. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1991.
[111]Gulati, R. Network location and learning:The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(5),397-420.
[112]Gulati, R., Nohria, N.,& Zaheer, A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3),203-215.
[113]Gustafson, K. New development in team building. Industrial and Commercial Training,1994,26(9),17-22.
[114]Hambrick, D. C. Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal,1982,3(2),159-174.
[115]Han, J. K., Kim, N.,& Srivastava, R. Market orientation and organizational performance:Is innovation a missing link? The Journal of Marketing,1998,62(4), 30-45.
[116]Han, K. C.,& Lee, S. H. Multinationality and firm performance. Multinational Business Review,1998,6(2),63-70
[117]Hayakawa, K., Machikita, T.& Kimura, F. Globalization and productivity:A survey of firm-level analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys,2012,26(2), 332-350.
[118]Hedberg, B. How organizations learn and unlearn. In:Nystrom. P. C., Starbuck, W.H.(Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Design. NewYork:Oxford University Press,1981.
[119]Helfat, C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation:The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(5), 339-360.
[120]Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. Dynamic capabilities:Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford:Blackwell,2007.
[121]Hendenson, R.,& Cockburn, I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1), 63-84.
[122]Hijzen, A., Inui, T.,& Todo, Y. The effects of multinational production on domestic performance:Evidence from Japanese firms. RIETI Discussion Paper 07-E-006,2007.
[123]Hijzen, A., Jean, S.,& Mayer, T. The effects at home of initiating production abroad:Evidence from matched French firms. Review of World Economics, 2011,147(3),457-483.
[124]Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P.,& Kim, W. An elcetic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(2),117-128.
[125]Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E.,& Ireland, R. D. A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management,1994,20(2),297-326.
[126]Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E.,& Kim, H. International diversification:Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal,1997,40(4),767-798.
[127]Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T.,& Connelly, B. International diversification:Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 2006,32(6):831-867.
[128]Hitt, M. A., Uhlenbruck, K.,& Shimizu, K. The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms:The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(6),1137-1157.
[129]Hobday, M. Innovation in East Asia:The challenge to Japan. Aldershot, Hants, England. E. El gar, Brookfield, VT, USA.1995.
[130]Hsu, C.,& Pereira, A. Internationalization and performance:The moderating effects of organizational learning. The international journal of management science,2008,36(2),188-205.
[131]Huber, G. Organizational learning:The contributing processes and the literature. Organizational Sciences,1991,2(1),88-115.
[132]Huber, G. P. Organizational learning:The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science,1991,2(1),88-115.
[133]Hughes, J.,& Sweeney, R. Corporate international diversification and market assigned measures of risk and diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1975,10(4),627-637.
[134]Hung, R. Y. Y., Chung, T.,& Lien, B. Y. H. Organizational process alignment and dynamic capabilities in High-tech industry. Total Quality Management& Business,2007,18(9),1023-1034.
[135]Iansiti, M.,& Clark, K.. B. Integration and dynamic capability:Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,3(3),557-605.
[136]Ito, Y. Choice for FDI and post-FDI productivity. RIETI Discussion Paper 07-E-049,2007.
[137]Jeong, I. A cross-national study of the relationship between international diversification and new product performance. International Marketing Review, 2003,20(4),353-376.
[138]Johanson, J.,& Vahlne, J. E. The internationalization process of the firm:A model of knowledge-development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies,1977,8(1),23-32.
[139]Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P.,& Liu, A. H. Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research. Industrial Marketing Management,1999,28(3), 201-21.
[140]Kafouros, M. I. The impact of the Internet on R&D-efficiency:Theory and evidence. Technovation,2006,26(7),827-835.
[141]Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A.,& Wang, C. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation,2008, 28(1/2),63-74.
[142]Kiesler, S.,& Sproull, L. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem solving from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly,1982,27(4),548-570.
[143]Kim, D. H. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review,1993,35(1),37-50.
[144]Kim, L. Imitation to innovation:The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.1997.
[145]Kim, W. C., Hwang, P.,& Burgers, W. P. Multinationals' diversification and the risk-return trade off. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(4),275-286.
[146]Kimura, F.,& Kiyota, K. Exports, FDI, and productivity:Dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. Review of World Economics,2006,142(4),695-719.
[147]King, A. A.& Tucci, C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches:The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management science,2002,48(2),171-186.
[148]Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perryy, M. Z.,& Cavusgil, S. T. A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality:A meta-analysis. Journal of Management,2012,38(2),502-530.
[149]Kobrin, S. J. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal,1991,12(special issue),17-37.
[150]Kogut, B.,& Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,1992,3(3),383-397.
[151]Kotabe, M. The relationship between offshore sourcing and innovativeness of US multinational firms:An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies,1990,21 (4),623-638.
[152]Kotabe, M., Jiang, C.,& Murray, J. Y. Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies:A case of China. Journal of World Business, 2011,46(2),166-176.
[153]Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S.,& Aulakh, P. S. Multinationality and firm performance:The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies,2002,33(1),79-97.
[154]Kox, H. L. M.,& Rojas-Romagosa, H. Exports and productivity selection effects for Dutch firms. De Economist,2010,158(3),295-322.
[155]Kumar, M. S. Growth, acquisitions, and investment:An analysis of the growth of industrial firms and their overseas activities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.1984.
[156]Kumar, V.,& Subramaniam, V. A contingency framework for the mode of entry decision. Journal of World Business,1997,32(1),53-72.
[157]Lahiri, N. Geographic distribution of R&D activity:How does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(5),1194-1209.
[158]Lederman, D. An international multilevel analysis of product innovation. Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(4),606-619.
[159]Lee, S., Courtney, J.,& O'Keefe. R. M. A system of organizational learning using cognitive maps. International Journal of Management Science,1992,20(1), 23-36.
[160]Leonard-Barton, D. Core capability and core rigidity:A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(1):111-125.
[161]Levinthal, D. A.,& March, J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(2),95-112.
[162]Li, H.,& Atuahene-Gima, K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6),469-490.
[163]Li, H.,& Zhang, Y. The role of managers political networking and functional experience in new venture performance:Evidence from china's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(8),791-804.
[164]Li, J. T.,& Yue, D. R. Market size, legal institutions, and international diversification strategies:Implications for the performance of multinational firms. Management International Review,2008,48(6),667-688.
[165]Li, L.,& Qian, G. Dimensions of international diversification:The joint effects on firm performance. Journal of Global Marketing,2005,18(3/4),7-35.
[166]Li, L. Is regional strategy more effective than global strategy in the US service industries? Management International Review,2005,45(1),37-57.
[167]Li, L. Multinationality and performance:A synthetic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews.2007,9(2),117-139.
[168]Liao, J. J., Kickul, J. R.,& Ma, H. Organizational dynamic capability and innovation:An empirical examination of internet firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2009,47(3),263-286.
[169]Lin, H.,& Lin, E. S. FD1, Trade, and product innovation:Theory and evidence. Southern Economic Journal,2010,77(2),434-464.
[170]Liu, X.,& Buck, T. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers:Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy,2007,36(3),355-366.
[171]Liu, X.& Zou, H. The impact of greenfield FDI and mergers and acquisitions on innovation in Chinese high-tech industries. Journal of World Business,2008, 43(3),352-364.
[172]Lu, J. W.,& Beamish, P. W. International diversification and firm perfoRmance:The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal,2004, 47(4),598-608.
[173]Lu, J. W.,& Beamish, P. W. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6/7),565-586.
[174]Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G.,& Li, W. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(3), 419-436.
[175]Lumenga-Neso, O., Olarreaga, M.,& Schiff, M. On'indirect'trade-related R&D spillovers. European Economic Review,2005,49(7),1785-1798.
[176]Luo, Y.,& Tung, R. L. International expansion of emerging market enterprises:A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38(4),481-498.
[177]Lyles, M. A. Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms. Management International Review,1988,28(Special issue),85-98.
[178]Mabert, V. A., Muth, J. F.,& Schmenner, R. W. Collapsing new product development times:Six case studies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992,9(3),200-212.
[179]MacGarvie, M. Do firms learn from international trade? The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88(1),46-60.
[180]Mahmooda, I. P.,& Zheng, W. Whether and how:Effects of international joint ventures on local innovation in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 2009,38(9),1489-1503.
[181]Majocchi, A.,& Zucclella, A. Internationalization and performance:Findings from a set of small Italian SMEs. International Small Business Journal,2003, 21(3),249-268.
[182]Makadok, R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal,2001, 22(5),387-401.
[183]Makino, S.,& Delios, A. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(5),905-927.
[184]Malik, O. R.,& Kotabe, M. Dynamic capabilities, government policies, and performance in firms from emerging economies:Evidence from India and Pakistan. Journal of management studies,2009,46(3),421-450.
[185]March, J. G.,& Simon, H. A. Organizations. Wiley:New York,1958.
[186]March, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,1991,2(1),71-87.
[187]Marsh, S. J.,& Stock, G. N. Creating dynamic capability:The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2006,23(5),422-436.
[188]McKelvie, A.,& Davidsson, P. From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management,2009,20(1), 63-80.
[189]Meyers, P. W. Non-Linear learning in large technological firms:Period four implies chaos, Research Policy,1990,19(2),97-115.
[190]Mezias, S. J.,& Glyn, M. A. The three faces of corporate renewal:Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(2),77-101.
[191]Michael, A.,& Shaked, I. Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations:Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business,1986,18(3),89-100.
[192]Miller, D. A preliminary typology of organizational learning:Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management,1996,22(3),485-505.
[193]Montalvo, C. What triggers change and innovation? Technovation,2006, 26(3),312-323.
[194]Morck, R.,& Yeung, B. Why investors value multinationality? Journal of Business,1991,64(2),165-187.
[195]Navaretti, B.,& Castellani, D. Investments abroad and performance at home: Evidence from Italian multinationals. CEPR Discussion Paper 4284,2004.
[196]Navaretti, B., Castellani, D.& Disdier, A-C. How does investing in cheap labour countries affect performance at home? Firm-level evidence from France and Italy. Oxford Economic Papers,2010,62(2),234-260.
[197]Nelson, R. R.,& Winter, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1982.
[198]Nonaka, I.,& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1995.
[199]Nonaka. I.,& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. NewYork:Oxford University Press,1995.
[200]O'Reilly III, C. A.,& Tushman, M. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior,2008, 28(1),185-206.
[201]Pan, Y.,& Tse, D. K. The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies,2000,31 (4),535-554.
[202]Peng, M. W.,& Luo, Y. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy:The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(3),486-501.
[203]Penrose, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm. London:Basil Blackwell. 1959.
[204]Peteraf, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage:A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(3),179-191.
[205]Pilar, J., Jose, C.,& Ramon, V. Organizational learning capability:A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research,2005,58 (6),715-725.
[206]Pittiglio, R., Sica, E.,& Villa, S. Innovation and internationalization:The case of Italy. Journal Technology Transfer,2009,34(6),588-602.
[207]Porter, M. E. Competitive strategy:Technique for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY:Free Press,1980.
[208]Porter, M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. New York:Free Press, 1990.
[209]Prahalad, C. K.,& Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,1990,68(3),79-9.
[210]Prieto, I. M., Revilla, E.,& Rodriguez-Prado, B. Building dynamic capabilities in product development:How do contextual antecedents matter? Scandinavian Journal of Management,2009,25(3),313-326.
[211]Qian, G.,& Li, J. Multinationality, global market diversification and profitability among the largest US firms. Journal of Business Research,2002, 55(4),325-335.
[212]Qian, G. Multinationality, product diversification, and profitability of emerging U.S. small-and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing,2002,17(6),611-633.
[213]Ramaswamy, K. Multinationality, configuration, and performance:A study of MNEs in the U.S. drug and pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Management,1995, (1),231-253.
[214]Ramaswamy, K., Kroeck, G.,& Renforth, W. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm:A comment. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(1),167-178.
[215]Ramirez-Aleson, M.,& Espitia-Escuer, M. A. The effect of international diversification strategy on the performance of Spanish-based firms during the period 1991-1995. Management International Review,2001,41(3),291-315.
[216]Reid, S. D. The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies,1981,12(2),101-112.
[217]Rhee, Y., Ross-Larson, B.,& Pursell, G. Korea's competitive edge: Managing the entry into world markets. Baltimore, MD:World Bank by the Johns Hopkins University Press,1984.
[218]Riahi-Belkaoui, A.,& Alnajjar, F. Multinationality as a determinant of earnings persistence. Managerial Finance,2002,28(3),83-96.
[219]Riahi-Belkaoui, A. Level of multinationality as an explanation for post-announcement drift. International Journal of Accounting,2002,37(4), 413-419.
[220]Riahi-Belkaoui, A. The effects of the degree of internationalization on firm performance. International Business Review,1998,7(3),315-321.
[221]Root, F. R. Entry strategies for international markets. D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA,1987.
[222]Rosenberg, N. Inside the black box:Technology and economies. Cambridge University Press,1982.
[223]Ruigrok, W.,& Wagner, H. Internationalization and performance:An organizational learning perspective. Management International Review,2003, 43(1),63-83.
[224]Ruigrok, W., Amann, W.,& Wagner, H. The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms:A test of the S-shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review,2007,47(3),349-368.
[225]Salomon, R.,& Shaver, J. Learning by exporting:New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2005, 14(2),431-460.
[226]Sanna-Randaccio, F.,& Veugelers, R. Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D:A game-theoretic approach. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(1),47-63.
[227]Senge, P. M. The fifth discipline:Art and practice of the learning organization. New York:Doubleday,1990.
[228]Shavelson, R. J.,& Towne, L. Scientific research in education. Washington, DC:National Academy Press,2002.
[229]Siddharthan, N. S.,& Lall, S. The recent growth of the largest U.S. multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1982,44(1),1-13.
[230]Simon, H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1955,69(1),99-118.
[231]Simon, H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science.1991,2(1),125-134.
[232]Slater, S. F.,& Narver. J. Customer led and market oriented:Let's not confuse the two. Strategy Management Journal,1998,19(10),1001-1006.
[233]Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M.& Hult, G. T. M. The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(12),1221-1231.
[234]Stata, R. Organizational learning-the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review,1989,30(3),63-74.
[235]Sullivan, D. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies,1994a,25(2),325-342.
[236]Sullivan. D. The 'threshold of internationalization':Replication, extension, and reinterpretation. Management International Review,1994b,34(2),168-182.
[237]Tallman, S.,& Li, J. T. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(1),179-196.
[238]Tan, J.,& Litsschert, R. J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications:An empirical study of the chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1),1-20.
[239]Teece, D. J.,& Pisano, G. The dynamic capabilities of firms:An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,3(3),537-556.
[240]Teece, D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets:The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 1998,40(3),55-79.
[241]Teece, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities:The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(13),1319-1350.
[242]Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,1986, 15(6),285-306.
[243]Teece, D. J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets:The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning,2000,33(1),35-54.
[244]Teece, D. J., Pisano, G.,& Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7),509-533.
[245]Temouri, Y., Vogel, A.,& Wagner, J. Self-selection into export markets by business services firms—Evidence from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2013,25,146-158.
[246]Thomas, D. E.,& Eden, L. What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? Multinational Business Review,2004, 12(1),89-99.
[247]Thomas, D. E. International diversification and firm performance in Mexican firms:A curvilinear relationship? Journal of Business Research,2006,59(4),501-507.
[248]Venkatraman, N.,& Ramanujam, V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research:A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(4),801-814.
[249]Vernon, R. Intemational investment and international trade in the Product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(2),190-207.
[250]Vernon, R. Sovereignty at bay:The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. New York:Basic Books.1971.
[251]Vogel, A.,& Wagner, J. Exports and profitability—first evidence for German business services enterprises. Applied Economics Quarterly,2010,56(1),7-30.
[252]von Zedtwitz, M.,& Gassmann, O. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization:Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy,2002,31(4),569-588.
[253]Wagner, H. Internationalization speed and cost efficiency:Evidence from Germany. International Business Review,2004,13(4),447-463.
[254]Wagner, J. Exports and productivity:A survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy,2007,30(1),60-82.
[255]Wagner, J. Exports, imports and profitability:First evidence for manufacturing enterprises. Open Economies Review,2012,23 (5),747-765.
[256]Wagner, J. International firm activities and innovation:Evidence from knowledge production functions for german firms. The Icfai Journal of Knowledge Management,2008,6(2),47-62.
[257]Wagner, J. International trade and firm performance:A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics,2012,148(2),235-267.
[258]Walsh, J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition:Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science,1995,6(3),280-321.
[259]Wang, C. L.,& Ahmed, P. K. Dynamic capabilities:A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,2007,9(1),31-51.
[260]Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M.,& Boateng, A. What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks. International Business Review,2012,21(3),425-438.
[261]Wang, E., Klein, G.,& Jiang, J. J. IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance. International Journal of Production Research,2007,45(11),2419-2434.
[262]Welch, D. E.,& Welch, L. S. The internationalization process and networks: A strategic management perspective. Journal of International Marketing,1996, 4(3),11-28.
[263]Welch, L. S.,& Luostarinen, R. Internationalization:Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management,1988,14(2),34-55.
[264]Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5(2),171-180.
[265]Westphal, L. Technology strategy for economic development in a fast changing global economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2002, 11(4/5),275-320.
[266]Winter, S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10),991-995.
[267]Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W.,& Makino, S. Ownership based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International business Studies,1994,25(2),253-273.
[268]Wu, L. Y. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research,2010,63(1),27-31.
[269]Wu, L. Y. Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's High-tech firms. Journal of Business Research,2007, 60(5),549-555.
[270]Wu, L. Y. Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment:Perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises. Information & Management,2006,43(4),447-454.
[271]Yan, M.,& Gray, B. Bargaining power, management control and performance in United States-China joint ventures:A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(6),1475-151.
[272]Yasar, M.,& Rejesus, R. M. Exporting status and firm performance: Evidence from a matched sample. Economics Letters,2005,88(3),397-402.
[273]Yeoh, P. L. International learning:Antecedents and performance applications among newly internationalizing companies in an exporting context. International Marketing Review,2004,36(4/5),20-28.
[274]Yin, R. Case study research:Design and methods(2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing,1994.
[275]Yin, R. Case study research:Design and methods(3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publieations,2003.
[276]Young, S., Hamill, J., Wheeler, C.,& Davies, R. International market entry and development:Strategies and development. Hemel Hempstead:Harvester Wheatsheaf,1989.
[277]Yu, J., Gilbert, B. A.,& Oviatt, B. M. Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(4),424-446.
[278]Zahra, S. A.,& George, G. Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,2002, 27(2),185-203.
[279]Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D.,& Hitt, M. A. International expansion by new venture firms:International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(5), 925-950.
[280]Zahra, S., Sapienza, H.,& Davidsson, P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities:A review, model and research agenda. Journal of management studies, 2006,43(4),917-955.
[281]Zhang, Y.,& Li, H. Y. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster:The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(1),88-109.
[282]Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y.,& Zhou, L. FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms' country origin diversity and domestic firms'absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(9),969-989.
[283]Zhou, K. Z.,& Li, C. B. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research,2010, 63(3),224-231.
[284]Zhou, K. Z.& Wu, F. Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(5),547-561.
[285]Zhou, K. Z., Yim, B. C.,& Tse, D. K. The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. The Journal of Marketing,2005,69(2),42-60.
[286]Zollo, M.,& Winter, S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science,2002,13(3),339-351.
[287]Zott, C. Dynamic Capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance:Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(2),97-125.
[288]曹红军,赵剑波,王以华.动态能力的维度：基于中国企业的实证研究.科学学研究,2009,27(1),36-44.
[289]曹红军,赵剑波.动态能力如何影响企业绩效—基于中国企业的实证研究.南开管理评论,2008,11(6),54-65.
[290]曾萍,蓝海林.组织学习、知识创新与动态能力：机制和路径.中国软科学,2009(5),135-146.
[291]曾萍.知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究.科学学研究,2009,27(8),1271-1280.
[292]陈国权,马萌.组织学习的过程模型研究.管理科学学报,2000,3(3),15-23.
[293]陈劲,陈钰芬.企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3),86-91.
[294]陈劲,景劲松,吴沧澜,朱朝晖,童亮.我国企业技术创新国际化的模式及其动态演化.科学学研究,2003,21(3),315-320.
[295]陈劲,吴航,金珺.企业如何实施开放式创新：组织变革的视角.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(1),74-80.
[296]陈劲,吴航.企业如何实施开放式创新：项目管理视角.西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,22(1),19-24.
[297]陈劲,郑刚.创新管理-赢得持续竞争优势.北京：北京大学出版社,2009.
[298]陈钰芬,陈劲.开放式创新促进创新绩效的机理研究.科研管理,2009,30(4),1-]0.
[299]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[300]崔瑜,焦豪.企业家学习对动态能力的影响机制研究——基于企业家能力理论的视角.科学学研究,2009,26(增刊),403-410.
[301]董保宝,葛宝山,王侃.资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势：机理与路径.管理世界,2011(3),92-101.
[302]董保宝,葛宝山.新创企业资源整合过程与动态能力关系研究.科研管理,2012,33(2),107-114.
[303]董保宝.网络结构与竞争优势关系研究——基于动态能力中介效应的视角.管理学报,2012,9(1),50-56.
[304]杜建华,田晓明,蒋勤峰.基于动态能力的企业社会资本与创业绩效关系研究.中国软科学,2009(2),115-126.
[305]杜健,姜雁斌,郑素丽,章威.网络嵌入性视角下基于知识的动态能力构建机制.管理工程学报,2011,25(4),145-151.
[306]冯军政,魏江.国外动态能力维度划分及测量研究综述与展望.外国经济与管理,2011,33(7),26-33.
[307]冯军政.感知环境动荡性、动态能力与企业不连续创新研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2012.
[308]傅慧,朱仁宏,代吉林.基于知识和学习能力的企业竞争优势研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2009.
[309]高若阳.基于知识观的组织模块性与企业适应性研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[310]葛宝山,董保宝.基于动态能力中介作用的资源开发过程与新创企业绩效关系研究.管理学报,2009,6(4),520-526.
[311]郭爱芳.企业STI/DUI学习与技术创新绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[312]何郁冰.企业技术多样化与企业绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[313]贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界,2006(3),94-103.
[314]侯杰泰,温忠麟,程子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
[315]胡望斌,张玉利,牛芳.我国新企业创业导向、动态能力与企业成长关系实证研究.中国软科学,2009(4),107-118.
[316]黄俊,王钊,白硕,顾国伟,肖卫东.动态能力的测度：基于国内汽车行业的实证研究.管理评论,2010,22(1),76-81.
[317]贾怀勤.管理研究方法.北京：机械工业出版社,2006.
[318]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.转型经济中后发企业的创新能力追赶路径：国有企业和名营企业的双城故事.管理世界,2011(12),96-115.
[319]蒋勤峰,田晓明,王重鸣.企业动态能力测量之实证研究—以270家孵化器入孵企业为例.科学学研究,2008,26(3),604-611.
[320]蒋勤峰,田晓明.企业动态能力对企业创业绩效作用的实证研究.心理科 学,2008,31(5),1094-1099.
[321]蒋勤峰.孵化企业社会资本与创业绩效关系研究：基于动态能力中介效应的分析.博士学位论文,上海交通大学,2007.
[322]焦豪,魏江,崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析：基于创业导向和组织学习的视角.管理世界,2008(4),91-106.
[323]焦豪.企业动态能力、环境动态性与绩效关系的实证研究.软科学,2008,22(4),112-117.
[324]景劲松,陈劲,吴沧澜.我国企业R&D国际化的现状、特点及模式.研究与发展管理,2003,15(4),41-47.
[325]李大元,项保华,陈应龙.企业动态能力及其功效：环境不确定性的影响.南开管理评论,2009,12(6),60-68.
[326]李怀祖.管理研究方法论.西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004.
[327]李晓燕,毛基业.动态能力构建——基于离岸软件外包供应商的多案例研究.管理科学学报,2010,13(11),55-64.
[328]李兴旺.动态能力理论的操作框架研究：识别、架构与形成机制.经济科学出版社,2006.
[329]林萍,谢弦.不确定环境下动态能力构成框架的理论研究——基于资源管理过程视角.重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2012,29(2),35-42.
[330]林萍.动态能力的测量及作用：来自中国企业的经验数据.中南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,15(4),533-540.
[331]刘顺忠.组织学习能力对新服务开发绩效的影响机制研究.科学学研究,2009,27(3),411-417.
[332]刘雪锋.网络嵌入性与差异化战略及企业绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[333]罗氓,刘永俊.企业动态能力丽理论架构与柯成要素.中国工业经济,2009(1),75-86.
[334]马庆国.管理统计——数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究.北京：科学出版社,2002.
[335]孟晓斌,王重鸣,杨建锋.企业动态能力理论模型研究综述.外国经济与管理,2007,29(10),9-16.
[336]孟晓斌.国际创业背景下中小企业组织动态能力及其绩效机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[337]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型.管理世界,2010(5),118-129.
[338]施瑞龙.组织学习、战略执行力与企业绩效关系研究——基于长三角地区制造业企业的实证研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2009.
[339]孙海法,刘运国,方琳.案例研究的方法论.科研管理,2004,25(2),107-112.
[340]田晓明,蒋勤峰,王重鸣.企业动态能力与企业创业绩效关系实证研究—以270家孵化企业为例分析.科学学研究,2008,26(4),812-819.
[341]王飞绒.基于组织间学习的技术联盟与企业创新绩效关系研究——以生物技术产业为例.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[342]王国荣.组织学习视角：公司核心竞争力与组织学习方式相关性研究.博士学位论文,复旦大学,2008.
[343]王国顺,胡莎.企业国际化与经营绩效：中国制造业上市公司的实证研究.系统工程,2006,24(12),80-83.
[344]王凯.突发事件下决策者的框架效应研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[345]王莉.动态环境下企业网络、组织学习和企业绩效关系研究——以济南市高新技术企业为例.博士学位论文,山东大学,2008.
[346]王志玮.企业外部知识网络嵌入性对破坏性创新绩效的影响机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[347]王重鸣.心理学研究方法.北京：人民教育出版社,1990.
[348]吴航,陈劲,金珺.新兴经济国家高技术企业技术资源与国际化关系研究——来自“中国光谷”产业园区的证据.科学学研究,2012,30(6),870-876.
[349]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务.北京：科学出版社,2003.
[350]伍蓓.企业研发外包的模式、机理及动态演化研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[351]许军,梅姝娥.基于动态能力的电子商务价值创造研究.经济管理,2011,33(2),153-157.
[352]杨丽丽,赵进.国际化程度与企业绩效关系实证研究综述.外国经济与管理,2009,31(4),15-21.
[353]于海波,方俐洛,凌文轮.组织学习整合理论模型.心理科学进展,2004,12(2),246-255.
[354]张钢,王宇峰.组织模块性、知识基础与创新绩效——以动态能力为中介变量的实证研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,42(2),206-220.
[355]张公嵬,梁琦.出口与企业绩效：主要论题与最新进展.国际商务——对外经济贸易大学学报.2010(1),33-39.
[356]张琳.中小企业组织学习力与企业绩效关系实证研究——基于江西省的调研,博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2008.
[357]张一弛,欧怡.企业国际化的市场进入模式研究述评.经济科学,2001(4),11-19.
[358]张玉利,杨俊,任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界,2008(7),91-102.
[359]郑素丽,章威,吴晓波.基于知识的动态能力：理论与实证.科学学研究,2010,28(3),405-411.
[360]郑素丽.组织间资源对企业创新绩效的作用机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[361]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[362]朱伟民,万迪防.基于组织学习的企业知识管理.西安交通大学学报,2001,21(4),18-20.
[2]Aggarwal, R., Berrill, J., Hutson, E.,& Kearney, C. What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality. International Business Review,2011,20(5),557-577.
[3]Alegre, J.,& Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance:An empirical test. Technovation,2008,28(6), 315-326.
[4]Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R.,& Chiva, R. A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management,2006,9(4),333-346.
[5]Alvarez, R.,& Robertson, R. Exposure to foreign markets and plant-level innovation:Evidence from Chile and Mexico. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development,2004,13(1),57-87.
[6]Ambrosini, V.,& Bowman, C. What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews,2009,11(1),29-49.
[7]Amendolagine, V., Capolupo, R.,& Petragallo. N. Export status and performance in a panel of Italian manufacturing firms. (S.E.R.I.E.S Working Paper No.0027). Dipartomento di Scienze Economiche, Universita' degli Studi Bari.2010.
[8]Amsden, A. H. Asia's next giant:South korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.1989.
[9]Andersen, O. Internationalization and market entry mode:A review of theories and conceptual frameworks. Management International Review,1997,37(2), 27-42.
[10]Anderson, E.,& Gatignon, H. Modes of foreign entry:A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies,1986,17(3),1-26.
[11]Annavarjula, M.,& Beldona, S. Multinationality-performance relationship:A review and reconceptualization. The international journal of organizational analysis,2000,8(1),48-67.
[12]Argyres, N. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(2),129-150.
[13]Argyris. C.,& Schon, D. A. Organization learning. London:Addison-Wesley, 1978.
[14]Argyris, C. Learning and teaching:A theory of action perspectives. Journal of Management Education.1997,21(1),9-26.
[15]Arnold, J. M.,& Hussinger, K. Export behavior and firm productivity in german manufacturing:A firm-level analysis. Review of World Economics/ Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,2005,14(2),219-243.
[16]Arthurs, J. D.,& Busenitz, L. W. Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists. Journal of business venturing,2006,21(2), 195-215.
[17]Aw, B.-Y., Chung, S.,& Roberts, M. J. Productivity and turnover in the export market:Micro evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. World Bank Economic Review,2000,14 (1),65-90.
[18]Balachandra, R.,& Friar, J. H. Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation:A contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,1997,44(3),276-287.
[19]Baldwin, J. R.,& Gu, W. Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics,2003, 36 (3),634-657.
[20]Barkema, H. G.,& Vermeulen, F. International expansion through start-up or acquisition:A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal,1998, 41(1),7-26.
[21]Barney, J. B. Strategic factor markets:Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science,1986,32(10),1231-1241.
[22]Barney, J. Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17(1),99-12.
[23]Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management,1991,17(1),99-120.
[24]Barreto, I. Dynamic capabilities:a review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of management,2010,36(1),256-280.
[25]Bell, M.,& Pavitt, K. L. R. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change,1993,2(2),157-210.
[26]Bernard, A. B.,& Jensen, J. B. Exceptional exporter performance:Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics,1999,47 (1),1-26.
[27]Bernard, A. B.,& Jensen, J. B. Exporting and productivity in the USA. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004,20(3),343-357.
[28]Blalock, G.,& Gertler, P. Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting. Journal of Development Economics,2004,75(2),397-416.
[29]Bollen, K. A.,& Long, J. S. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.1993.
[30]Bowen, H. P. The empirics of multinationality and performance. In A. M. Rugman (Ed.), Regional aspects of multinationality and performance.2007,13, 113-142. San Diego:JAI Press.
[31]Brock, D. M.,& Yaffe, T. International diversification and performance:The mediating role of implementation. International Business Review,2008,17(5), 600-615.
[32]Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H.,& Zheng, P. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(4),499-518.
[33]Calori, R., Johnson, G.,& Sarnin, P. CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(6),437-457.
[34]Capar, N.,& Kotabe, M. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies,2003, 34(4),345-355.
[35]Castellani, D.,& Zanfei, A. Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy,2007,30(1),156-176.
[36]Caves, R. E. Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1982.
[37]Cepeda, G.,& Vera, D. Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities:A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research,2007,60(5), 426-437.
[38]Chang, J. International expansion path, speed, product diversification and performance among emerging-market MNEs:Evidence from Asia-Pacific multinational companies. Asian Business & Management,2007,6(4),331-353.
[39]Chang, S. C.,& Wang, C. F. The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business,2007,42(1),61-79.
[40]Chang, S. J. International expansion strategy of Japanese firms:Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(2), 383-393.
[41]Chari, M. D. R., Devaraj, S.,& David, P. International diversification and firm performance:Role of information technology investments. Journal of World Business,2007,42(2),184-197.
[42]Chen, T.-J.,& Ku, Y.-H. The effect of foreign direct investment on firm growth: The case of Taiwan's manufacturers. Japan and the World Economy,2000,12(2), 153-172.
[43]Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation:The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,2003.
[44]Chiang, Y. C.,& Yu, T. H. The relationship between multinationality and the performance of taiwan firms. Journal of American Academy of Business,2005, (3),130-134.
[45]Child, J.,& Rodrigues, S. B. The internationalization of Chinese firms:A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review,2005,1(3), 381-410.
[46]Clerides, S. K., Lach, S.,& Tybout, J. R. Is learning-by-exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,113 (3),903-948.
[47]Coe, D.,& Helpman, E. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review,1995,39(5),859-887.
[48]Cohen, W. M.,& Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1),128-152.
[49]Collis, D. J. How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(S1),143-152.
[50]Connolly, M. North-South technological diffusion:A new case for dynamic gains from trade. Duke University, Department of Economics Working Papers No. 99-08.2000.
[51]Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V.,& Kundu, S. K. Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance:The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business,2007,42 (4),401-417.
[52]Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K.,& Hsu, C-C. A three-stage theory of international expansion:The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(1),5-18.
[53]Cooper, R. G.,& Kleinschmidt, E. J. Resource allocation in the new product process. Industrial Marketing Management,1988,17(3),249-262.
[54]Cooper, R. G. Overall corporate strategies for new product development. Industrial Marketing Management,1985,14(3),179-193.
[55]Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J. D.,& Slaughter, M. J. Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11479 Cambridge, MA,2005.
[56]Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W.,& White, R. E. An organizational learning framework:From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review.1999, 24(3),522-537.
[57]Daft, R. L.,& Weick, K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation system. Academy of Management Review.1984,9(2),284-295.
[58]Damijan, J. P., Polanec, S.,& Prasnikar, J. Outward FDI and productivity: Micro-evidence from Slovenia. The World Economy,2007,30 (1),135-155.
[59]Daniels, J. D.,& Bracker, J. Profit performance:Do foreign operations make a difference? Management International Review,1989,29(1),46-56.
[60]Danneels, E. Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(5),519-543.
[61]Danneels, E. The Dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(12),1095-1121.
[62]Delios, A.,& Beamish, P. W. Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(8),711-721.
[63]Delios, A., Gaur, A. S.,& Makino, S. The timing of international expansion: Information, rivalry and imitation among Japanese firms,1980-2002. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(1),169-195.
[64]Delmas, M. A. Innovating against European rigidities:Institutional environment and dynamic capabilities. Journal of High Technology Management,2002,13(1), 19-43.
[65]Deng, P. Outward investment by Chinese MNCs:Motivations and implications. Business Horizons,2004,47(3),8-16.
[66]Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K.,& Yost, K. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance,2002,57(5),1951-1961.
[67]Dibrell, C., Davis, P. S.,& Danskin, P. The influence of internationalization on time-based competition. Management International Review,2005,45(2), 173-195.
[68]Dieriekx, I.,& Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science,1989,35(12),1504-1511.
[69]Dixon, M. N. Organizational learning cycle:How we can learn collectively. New York:McGraw-HIll,1994.
[70]Dougherty, D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization science,1992,3(2),179-202.
[7I]D(?)ving, E.,& Gooderham, P. N. Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification:The case of small firm accountancy practices. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(8),841-857.
[72]Drnevich, P. L.,& Kriauciunas. A. P. Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(3).254-279.
[73]Dunning, J. H. International production and the multinational enterprises. London: Allen and Unwin,1981.
[74]Dunning, J. H. The eclectic (oli) paradigm of international production:Past, present and future. International Journal of the economics of business,2001,8(2), 173-19.
[75]Eckert, S., Dittfeld. M., Muche, T.,& Rassler, S. Does multinationality lead to value enhancement? An empirical examination of publicly listed corporations from Germany. International Business Review,2010,19 (6),562-574.
[76]Eisenhardt, K. M.,& Martin, J. A. Dynamic capabilities:What are they? Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10/11),1105-1121.
[77]Eisenhardt, K. M. Building theory from case study. Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4),532-550.
[78]Elango B.,& Pattnaik C. Building capabilities for international operations through networks:A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(4),541-555.
[79]Enkel, E., Gassmann, O.,& Chesbrough H. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management,2009,39(4),311-316.
[80]Errunza, V. R.,& Senbet, L. W. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. Journal of Finance,1984,39(3),727-737.
[81]Fatemi, A. M. Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification. Journal of Finance,1984,39(5),1325-1344.
[82]Ferna'ndez, Z.,& Nieto, M. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies,2006,37(3), 340-351.
[83]Filatotchev, I.,& Piesse, J. R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms:European evidence. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(8), 1260-1276.
[84]Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T.,& Wright, M. The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets:The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(6),1005-1021.
[85]Fiol, C. M.,& Lyles, M. A. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review.1985,10(4),803-813.
[86]Fisch, J. H.,& Zschoche, M. Do firms benefit from multinationality through production shifting? Journal of International Management,2011,17(2),143-149.
[87]Fisch, J. H. Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm. Research Policy,2003,32(8),1381-1396.
[88]Fowler, F. J. Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage,1988.
[89]Fryges, H.,& Wagner, J. Exports and profitability:First evidence for German manufacturing firms. The World Economy,2010,33(3),399-423.
[90]Fulmer, R. M. A model for the way organizational learn. Planning Review,1994, 22(3),20-24.
[91]Gareth, M.,& Rafael, R. Action Learning:A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Social Change. Human Relations.1984,37(1):1-28.
[92]Gaur, A. S.,& Kumar, V. International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance:Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management,2009,20(2),172-186.
[93]Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W.,& DaCosta, R. C. Diversification strategy and internationalization:Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal,1989,10(2),109-119.
[94]Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S.,& Olsen, D. M. Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(1),51-80.
[95]Gherardi, S.,& Nicolini, D. The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management,2000,9(1),7-18.
[96]Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P.,& Zedeck, S. Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. New York:Freeman, San Franeisco, CA,1981.
[97]Ghoshal, S. Global strategy:An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal,1987,8(5),425-440.
[98]Gibson, C. B.,& Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal,2004, 47(2),209-226.
[99]Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago:Aldine, 1967.
[100]Goerzen, A.,& Beamish, P. Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(13),1289-1306.
[101]Golovko, E.,& Valentini, G. Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs'growth. Journal of International Business Studies,2011,42(3),362-380.
[102]Gomes, L.,& Ramaswamy, K. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies,1999,30(1),173-188.
[103]Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J.,& Terrell, K. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 14481 Cambridge, MA,2008.
[104]Grant, R. M. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies,1987,18(3),79-89.
[105]Grant, R. M., Jamine, A. P.,& Thomas, H. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies,1972-1984. Academy of Management Journal,1988,31(4),771-781.
[106]Grazzi, M. Export and firm performance:Evidence on productivity and profitability of Italian companies. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2012,12(4),413-444.
[107]Greenaway, D.,& Kneller, R. Exporting and productivity in the United Kingdom. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004,20(3),358-371.
[108]Greenaway, D.,& Yu, Z. Firm level interactions between exporting and productivity:Industry specific evidence, Research Paper Series No.1. Leverhulme Centre, Nottingham University.2004.
[109]Griffith, D. A.,& Harvey, M. G. A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies,2001,32(3),597-606.
[110]Grossman, G.,& Helpman, E. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1991.
[111]Gulati, R. Network location and learning:The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(5),397-420.
[112]Gulati, R., Nohria, N.,& Zaheer, A. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3),203-215.
[113]Gustafson, K. New development in team building. Industrial and Commercial Training,1994,26(9),17-22.
[114]Hambrick, D. C. Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strategic Management Journal,1982,3(2),159-174.
[115]Han, J. K., Kim, N.,& Srivastava, R. Market orientation and organizational performance:Is innovation a missing link? The Journal of Marketing,1998,62(4), 30-45.
[116]Han, K. C.,& Lee, S. H. Multinationality and firm performance. Multinational Business Review,1998,6(2),63-70
[117]Hayakawa, K., Machikita, T.& Kimura, F. Globalization and productivity:A survey of firm-level analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys,2012,26(2), 332-350.
[118]Hedberg, B. How organizations learn and unlearn. In:Nystrom. P. C., Starbuck, W.H.(Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Design. NewYork:Oxford University Press,1981.
[119]Helfat, C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation:The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(5), 339-360.
[120]Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. Dynamic capabilities:Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford:Blackwell,2007.
[121]Hendenson, R.,& Cockburn, I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1), 63-84.
[122]Hijzen, A., Inui, T.,& Todo, Y. The effects of multinational production on domestic performance:Evidence from Japanese firms. RIETI Discussion Paper 07-E-006,2007.
[123]Hijzen, A., Jean, S.,& Mayer, T. The effects at home of initiating production abroad:Evidence from matched French firms. Review of World Economics, 2011,147(3),457-483.
[124]Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P.,& Kim, W. An elcetic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(2),117-128.
[125]Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E.,& Ireland, R. D. A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management,1994,20(2),297-326.
[126]Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E.,& Kim, H. International diversification:Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal,1997,40(4),767-798.
[127]Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T.,& Connelly, B. International diversification:Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 2006,32(6):831-867.
[128]Hitt, M. A., Uhlenbruck, K.,& Shimizu, K. The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms:The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(6),1137-1157.
[129]Hobday, M. Innovation in East Asia:The challenge to Japan. Aldershot, Hants, England. E. El gar, Brookfield, VT, USA.1995.
[130]Hsu, C.,& Pereira, A. Internationalization and performance:The moderating effects of organizational learning. The international journal of management science,2008,36(2),188-205.
[131]Huber, G. Organizational learning:The contributing processes and the literature. Organizational Sciences,1991,2(1),88-115.
[132]Huber, G. P. Organizational learning:The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science,1991,2(1),88-115.
[133]Hughes, J.,& Sweeney, R. Corporate international diversification and market assigned measures of risk and diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1975,10(4),627-637.
[134]Hung, R. Y. Y., Chung, T.,& Lien, B. Y. H. Organizational process alignment and dynamic capabilities in High-tech industry. Total Quality Management& Business,2007,18(9),1023-1034.
[135]Iansiti, M.,& Clark, K.. B. Integration and dynamic capability:Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,3(3),557-605.
[136]Ito, Y. Choice for FDI and post-FDI productivity. RIETI Discussion Paper 07-E-049,2007.
[137]Jeong, I. A cross-national study of the relationship between international diversification and new product performance. International Marketing Review, 2003,20(4),353-376.
[138]Johanson, J.,& Vahlne, J. E. The internationalization process of the firm:A model of knowledge-development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies,1977,8(1),23-32.
[139]Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P.,& Liu, A. H. Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research. Industrial Marketing Management,1999,28(3), 201-21.
[140]Kafouros, M. I. The impact of the Internet on R&D-efficiency:Theory and evidence. Technovation,2006,26(7),827-835.
[141]Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A.,& Wang, C. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation,2008, 28(1/2),63-74.
[142]Kiesler, S.,& Sproull, L. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem solving from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly,1982,27(4),548-570.
[143]Kim, D. H. The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review,1993,35(1),37-50.
[144]Kim, L. Imitation to innovation:The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.1997.
[145]Kim, W. C., Hwang, P.,& Burgers, W. P. Multinationals' diversification and the risk-return trade off. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(4),275-286.
[146]Kimura, F.,& Kiyota, K. Exports, FDI, and productivity:Dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. Review of World Economics,2006,142(4),695-719.
[147]King, A. A.& Tucci, C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches:The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management science,2002,48(2),171-186.
[148]Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perryy, M. Z.,& Cavusgil, S. T. A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality:A meta-analysis. Journal of Management,2012,38(2),502-530.
[149]Kobrin, S. J. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal,1991,12(special issue),17-37.
[150]Kogut, B.,& Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,1992,3(3),383-397.
[151]Kotabe, M. The relationship between offshore sourcing and innovativeness of US multinational firms:An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies,1990,21 (4),623-638.
[152]Kotabe, M., Jiang, C.,& Murray, J. Y. Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies:A case of China. Journal of World Business, 2011,46(2),166-176.
[153]Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S.,& Aulakh, P. S. Multinationality and firm performance:The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies,2002,33(1),79-97.
[154]Kox, H. L. M.,& Rojas-Romagosa, H. Exports and productivity selection effects for Dutch firms. De Economist,2010,158(3),295-322.
[155]Kumar, M. S. Growth, acquisitions, and investment:An analysis of the growth of industrial firms and their overseas activities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.1984.
[156]Kumar, V.,& Subramaniam, V. A contingency framework for the mode of entry decision. Journal of World Business,1997,32(1),53-72.
[157]Lahiri, N. Geographic distribution of R&D activity:How does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(5),1194-1209.
[158]Lederman, D. An international multilevel analysis of product innovation. Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(4),606-619.
[159]Lee, S., Courtney, J.,& O'Keefe. R. M. A system of organizational learning using cognitive maps. International Journal of Management Science,1992,20(1), 23-36.
[160]Leonard-Barton, D. Core capability and core rigidity:A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(1):111-125.
[161]Levinthal, D. A.,& March, J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(2),95-112.
[162]Li, H.,& Atuahene-Gima, K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6),469-490.
[163]Li, H.,& Zhang, Y. The role of managers political networking and functional experience in new venture performance:Evidence from china's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(8),791-804.
[164]Li, J. T.,& Yue, D. R. Market size, legal institutions, and international diversification strategies:Implications for the performance of multinational firms. Management International Review,2008,48(6),667-688.
[165]Li, L.,& Qian, G. Dimensions of international diversification:The joint effects on firm performance. Journal of Global Marketing,2005,18(3/4),7-35.
[166]Li, L. Is regional strategy more effective than global strategy in the US service industries? Management International Review,2005,45(1),37-57.
[167]Li, L. Multinationality and performance:A synthetic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews.2007,9(2),117-139.
[168]Liao, J. J., Kickul, J. R.,& Ma, H. Organizational dynamic capability and innovation:An empirical examination of internet firms. Journal of Small Business Management,2009,47(3),263-286.
[169]Lin, H.,& Lin, E. S. FD1, Trade, and product innovation:Theory and evidence. Southern Economic Journal,2010,77(2),434-464.
[170]Liu, X.,& Buck, T. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers:Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy,2007,36(3),355-366.
[171]Liu, X.& Zou, H. The impact of greenfield FDI and mergers and acquisitions on innovation in Chinese high-tech industries. Journal of World Business,2008, 43(3),352-364.
[172]Lu, J. W.,& Beamish, P. W. International diversification and firm perfoRmance:The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal,2004, 47(4),598-608.
[173]Lu, J. W.,& Beamish, P. W. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6/7),565-586.
[174]Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G.,& Li, W. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(3), 419-436.
[175]Lumenga-Neso, O., Olarreaga, M.,& Schiff, M. On'indirect'trade-related R&D spillovers. European Economic Review,2005,49(7),1785-1798.
[176]Luo, Y.,& Tung, R. L. International expansion of emerging market enterprises:A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38(4),481-498.
[177]Lyles, M. A. Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms. Management International Review,1988,28(Special issue),85-98.
[178]Mabert, V. A., Muth, J. F.,& Schmenner, R. W. Collapsing new product development times:Six case studies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992,9(3),200-212.
[179]MacGarvie, M. Do firms learn from international trade? The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88(1),46-60.
[180]Mahmooda, I. P.,& Zheng, W. Whether and how:Effects of international joint ventures on local innovation in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 2009,38(9),1489-1503.
[181]Majocchi, A.,& Zucclella, A. Internationalization and performance:Findings from a set of small Italian SMEs. International Small Business Journal,2003, 21(3),249-268.
[182]Makadok, R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal,2001, 22(5),387-401.
[183]Makino, S.,& Delios, A. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(5),905-927.
[184]Malik, O. R.,& Kotabe, M. Dynamic capabilities, government policies, and performance in firms from emerging economies:Evidence from India and Pakistan. Journal of management studies,2009,46(3),421-450.
[185]March, J. G.,& Simon, H. A. Organizations. Wiley:New York,1958.
[186]March, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,1991,2(1),71-87.
[187]Marsh, S. J.,& Stock, G. N. Creating dynamic capability:The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2006,23(5),422-436.
[188]McKelvie, A.,& Davidsson, P. From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management,2009,20(1), 63-80.
[189]Meyers, P. W. Non-Linear learning in large technological firms:Period four implies chaos, Research Policy,1990,19(2),97-115.
[190]Mezias, S. J.,& Glyn, M. A. The three faces of corporate renewal:Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(2),77-101.
[191]Michael, A.,& Shaked, I. Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations:Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business,1986,18(3),89-100.
[192]Miller, D. A preliminary typology of organizational learning:Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management,1996,22(3),485-505.
[193]Montalvo, C. What triggers change and innovation? Technovation,2006, 26(3),312-323.
[194]Morck, R.,& Yeung, B. Why investors value multinationality? Journal of Business,1991,64(2),165-187.
[195]Navaretti, B.,& Castellani, D. Investments abroad and performance at home: Evidence from Italian multinationals. CEPR Discussion Paper 4284,2004.
[196]Navaretti, B., Castellani, D.& Disdier, A-C. How does investing in cheap labour countries affect performance at home? Firm-level evidence from France and Italy. Oxford Economic Papers,2010,62(2),234-260.
[197]Nelson, R. R.,& Winter, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1982.
[198]Nonaka, I.,& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1995.
[199]Nonaka. I.,& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. NewYork:Oxford University Press,1995.
[200]O'Reilly III, C. A.,& Tushman, M. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior,2008, 28(1),185-206.
[201]Pan, Y.,& Tse, D. K. The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies,2000,31 (4),535-554.
[202]Peng, M. W.,& Luo, Y. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy:The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(3),486-501.
[203]Penrose, E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm. London:Basil Blackwell. 1959.
[204]Peteraf, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage:A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(3),179-191.
[205]Pilar, J., Jose, C.,& Ramon, V. Organizational learning capability:A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research,2005,58 (6),715-725.
[206]Pittiglio, R., Sica, E.,& Villa, S. Innovation and internationalization:The case of Italy. Journal Technology Transfer,2009,34(6),588-602.
[207]Porter, M. E. Competitive strategy:Technique for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY:Free Press,1980.
[208]Porter, M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. New York:Free Press, 1990.
[209]Prahalad, C. K.,& Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,1990,68(3),79-9.
[210]Prieto, I. M., Revilla, E.,& Rodriguez-Prado, B. Building dynamic capabilities in product development:How do contextual antecedents matter? Scandinavian Journal of Management,2009,25(3),313-326.
[211]Qian, G.,& Li, J. Multinationality, global market diversification and profitability among the largest US firms. Journal of Business Research,2002, 55(4),325-335.
[212]Qian, G. Multinationality, product diversification, and profitability of emerging U.S. small-and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing,2002,17(6),611-633.
[213]Ramaswamy, K. Multinationality, configuration, and performance:A study of MNEs in the U.S. drug and pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Management,1995, (1),231-253.
[214]Ramaswamy, K., Kroeck, G.,& Renforth, W. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm:A comment. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(1),167-178.
[215]Ramirez-Aleson, M.,& Espitia-Escuer, M. A. The effect of international diversification strategy on the performance of Spanish-based firms during the period 1991-1995. Management International Review,2001,41(3),291-315.
[216]Reid, S. D. The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies,1981,12(2),101-112.
[217]Rhee, Y., Ross-Larson, B.,& Pursell, G. Korea's competitive edge: Managing the entry into world markets. Baltimore, MD:World Bank by the Johns Hopkins University Press,1984.
[218]Riahi-Belkaoui, A.,& Alnajjar, F. Multinationality as a determinant of earnings persistence. Managerial Finance,2002,28(3),83-96.
[219]Riahi-Belkaoui, A. Level of multinationality as an explanation for post-announcement drift. International Journal of Accounting,2002,37(4), 413-419.
[220]Riahi-Belkaoui, A. The effects of the degree of internationalization on firm performance. International Business Review,1998,7(3),315-321.
[221]Root, F. R. Entry strategies for international markets. D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA,1987.
[222]Rosenberg, N. Inside the black box:Technology and economies. Cambridge University Press,1982.
[223]Ruigrok, W.,& Wagner, H. Internationalization and performance:An organizational learning perspective. Management International Review,2003, 43(1),63-83.
[224]Ruigrok, W., Amann, W.,& Wagner, H. The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms:A test of the S-shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review,2007,47(3),349-368.
[225]Salomon, R.,& Shaver, J. Learning by exporting:New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2005, 14(2),431-460.
[226]Sanna-Randaccio, F.,& Veugelers, R. Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D:A game-theoretic approach. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(1),47-63.
[227]Senge, P. M. The fifth discipline:Art and practice of the learning organization. New York:Doubleday,1990.
[228]Shavelson, R. J.,& Towne, L. Scientific research in education. Washington, DC:National Academy Press,2002.
[229]Siddharthan, N. S.,& Lall, S. The recent growth of the largest U.S. multinationals. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1982,44(1),1-13.
[230]Simon, H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1955,69(1),99-118.
[231]Simon, H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science.1991,2(1),125-134.
[232]Slater, S. F.,& Narver. J. Customer led and market oriented:Let's not confuse the two. Strategy Management Journal,1998,19(10),1001-1006.
[233]Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M.& Hult, G. T. M. The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(12),1221-1231.
[234]Stata, R. Organizational learning-the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review,1989,30(3),63-74.
[235]Sullivan, D. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies,1994a,25(2),325-342.
[236]Sullivan. D. The 'threshold of internationalization':Replication, extension, and reinterpretation. Management International Review,1994b,34(2),168-182.
[237]Tallman, S.,& Li, J. T. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(1),179-196.
[238]Tan, J.,& Litsschert, R. J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications:An empirical study of the chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1),1-20.
[239]Teece, D. J.,& Pisano, G. The dynamic capabilities of firms:An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,3(3),537-556.
[240]Teece, D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets:The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 1998,40(3),55-79.
[241]Teece, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities:The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(13),1319-1350.
[242]Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,1986, 15(6),285-306.
[243]Teece, D. J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets:The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning,2000,33(1),35-54.
[244]Teece, D. J., Pisano, G.,& Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7),509-533.
[245]Temouri, Y., Vogel, A.,& Wagner, J. Self-selection into export markets by business services firms—Evidence from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2013,25,146-158.
[246]Thomas, D. E.,& Eden, L. What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? Multinational Business Review,2004, 12(1),89-99.
[247]Thomas, D. E. International diversification and firm performance in Mexican firms:A curvilinear relationship? Journal of Business Research,2006,59(4),501-507.
[248]Venkatraman, N.,& Ramanujam, V. Measurement of business performance in strategy research:A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(4),801-814.
[249]Vernon, R. Intemational investment and international trade in the Product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(2),190-207.
[250]Vernon, R. Sovereignty at bay:The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. New York:Basic Books.1971.
[251]Vogel, A.,& Wagner, J. Exports and profitability—first evidence for German business services enterprises. Applied Economics Quarterly,2010,56(1),7-30.
[252]von Zedtwitz, M.,& Gassmann, O. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization:Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy,2002,31(4),569-588.
[253]Wagner, H. Internationalization speed and cost efficiency:Evidence from Germany. International Business Review,2004,13(4),447-463.
[254]Wagner, J. Exports and productivity:A survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy,2007,30(1),60-82.
[255]Wagner, J. Exports, imports and profitability:First evidence for manufacturing enterprises. Open Economies Review,2012,23 (5),747-765.
[256]Wagner, J. International firm activities and innovation:Evidence from knowledge production functions for german firms. The Icfai Journal of Knowledge Management,2008,6(2),47-62.
[257]Wagner, J. International trade and firm performance:A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics,2012,148(2),235-267.
[258]Walsh, J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition:Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science,1995,6(3),280-321.
[259]Wang, C. L.,& Ahmed, P. K. Dynamic capabilities:A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,2007,9(1),31-51.
[260]Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M.,& Boateng, A. What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks. International Business Review,2012,21(3),425-438.
[261]Wang, E., Klein, G.,& Jiang, J. J. IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance. International Journal of Production Research,2007,45(11),2419-2434.
[262]Welch, D. E.,& Welch, L. S. The internationalization process and networks: A strategic management perspective. Journal of International Marketing,1996, 4(3),11-28.
[263]Welch, L. S.,& Luostarinen, R. Internationalization:Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management,1988,14(2),34-55.
[264]Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984,5(2),171-180.
[265]Westphal, L. Technology strategy for economic development in a fast changing global economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2002, 11(4/5),275-320.
[266]Winter, S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10),991-995.
[267]Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W.,& Makino, S. Ownership based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International business Studies,1994,25(2),253-273.
[268]Wu, L. Y. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research,2010,63(1),27-31.
[269]Wu, L. Y. Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's High-tech firms. Journal of Business Research,2007, 60(5),549-555.
[270]Wu, L. Y. Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment:Perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises. Information & Management,2006,43(4),447-454.
[271]Yan, M.,& Gray, B. Bargaining power, management control and performance in United States-China joint ventures:A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(6),1475-151.
[272]Yasar, M.,& Rejesus, R. M. Exporting status and firm performance: Evidence from a matched sample. Economics Letters,2005,88(3),397-402.
[273]Yeoh, P. L. International learning:Antecedents and performance applications among newly internationalizing companies in an exporting context. International Marketing Review,2004,36(4/5),20-28.
[274]Yin, R. Case study research:Design and methods(2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing,1994.
[275]Yin, R. Case study research:Design and methods(3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publieations,2003.
[276]Young, S., Hamill, J., Wheeler, C.,& Davies, R. International market entry and development:Strategies and development. Hemel Hempstead:Harvester Wheatsheaf,1989.
[277]Yu, J., Gilbert, B. A.,& Oviatt, B. M. Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2011,32(4),424-446.
[278]Zahra, S. A.,& George, G. Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,2002, 27(2),185-203.
[279]Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D.,& Hitt, M. A. International expansion by new venture firms:International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(5), 925-950.
[280]Zahra, S., Sapienza, H.,& Davidsson, P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities:A review, model and research agenda. Journal of management studies, 2006,43(4),917-955.
[281]Zhang, Y.,& Li, H. Y. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster:The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(1),88-109.
[282]Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y.,& Zhou, L. FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms' country origin diversity and domestic firms'absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(9),969-989.
[283]Zhou, K. Z.,& Li, C. B. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research,2010, 63(3),224-231.
[284]Zhou, K. Z.& Wu, F. Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(5),547-561.
[285]Zhou, K. Z., Yim, B. C.,& Tse, D. K. The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. The Journal of Marketing,2005,69(2),42-60.
[286]Zollo, M.,& Winter, S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science,2002,13(3),339-351.
[287]Zott, C. Dynamic Capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance:Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(2),97-125.
[288]曹红军,赵剑波,王以华.动态能力的维度：基于中国企业的实证研究.科学学研究,2009,27(1),36-44.
[289]曹红军,赵剑波.动态能力如何影响企业绩效—基于中国企业的实证研究.南开管理评论,2008,11(6),54-65.
[290]曾萍,蓝海林.组织学习、知识创新与动态能力：机制和路径.中国软科学,2009(5),135-146.
[291]曾萍.知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究.科学学研究,2009,27(8),1271-1280.
[292]陈国权,马萌.组织学习的过程模型研究.管理科学学报,2000,3(3),15-23.
[293]陈劲,陈钰芬.企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3),86-91.
[294]陈劲,景劲松,吴沧澜,朱朝晖,童亮.我国企业技术创新国际化的模式及其动态演化.科学学研究,2003,21(3),315-320.
[295]陈劲,吴航,金珺.企业如何实施开放式创新：组织变革的视角.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(1),74-80.
[296]陈劲,吴航.企业如何实施开放式创新：项目管理视角.西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,22(1),19-24.
[297]陈劲,郑刚.创新管理-赢得持续竞争优势.北京：北京大学出版社,2009.
[298]陈钰芬,陈劲.开放式创新促进创新绩效的机理研究.科研管理,2009,30(4),1-]0.
[299]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[300]崔瑜,焦豪.企业家学习对动态能力的影响机制研究——基于企业家能力理论的视角.科学学研究,2009,26(增刊),403-410.
[301]董保宝,葛宝山,王侃.资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势：机理与路径.管理世界,2011(3),92-101.
[302]董保宝,葛宝山.新创企业资源整合过程与动态能力关系研究.科研管理,2012,33(2),107-114.
[303]董保宝.网络结构与竞争优势关系研究——基于动态能力中介效应的视角.管理学报,2012,9(1),50-56.
[304]杜建华,田晓明,蒋勤峰.基于动态能力的企业社会资本与创业绩效关系研究.中国软科学,2009(2),115-126.
[305]杜健,姜雁斌,郑素丽,章威.网络嵌入性视角下基于知识的动态能力构建机制.管理工程学报,2011,25(4),145-151.
[306]冯军政,魏江.国外动态能力维度划分及测量研究综述与展望.外国经济与管理,2011,33(7),26-33.
[307]冯军政.感知环境动荡性、动态能力与企业不连续创新研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2012.
[308]傅慧,朱仁宏,代吉林.基于知识和学习能力的企业竞争优势研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2009.
[309]高若阳.基于知识观的组织模块性与企业适应性研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[310]葛宝山,董保宝.基于动态能力中介作用的资源开发过程与新创企业绩效关系研究.管理学报,2009,6(4),520-526.
[311]郭爱芳.企业STI/DUI学习与技术创新绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[312]何郁冰.企业技术多样化与企业绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[313]贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界,2006(3),94-103.
[314]侯杰泰,温忠麟,程子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
[315]胡望斌,张玉利,牛芳.我国新企业创业导向、动态能力与企业成长关系实证研究.中国软科学,2009(4),107-118.
[316]黄俊,王钊,白硕,顾国伟,肖卫东.动态能力的测度：基于国内汽车行业的实证研究.管理评论,2010,22(1),76-81.
[317]贾怀勤.管理研究方法.北京：机械工业出版社,2006.
[318]江诗松,龚丽敏,魏江.转型经济中后发企业的创新能力追赶路径：国有企业和名营企业的双城故事.管理世界,2011(12),96-115.
[319]蒋勤峰,田晓明,王重鸣.企业动态能力测量之实证研究—以270家孵化器入孵企业为例.科学学研究,2008,26(3),604-611.
[320]蒋勤峰,田晓明.企业动态能力对企业创业绩效作用的实证研究.心理科 学,2008,31(5),1094-1099.
[321]蒋勤峰.孵化企业社会资本与创业绩效关系研究：基于动态能力中介效应的分析.博士学位论文,上海交通大学,2007.
[322]焦豪,魏江,崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析：基于创业导向和组织学习的视角.管理世界,2008(4),91-106.
[323]焦豪.企业动态能力、环境动态性与绩效关系的实证研究.软科学,2008,22(4),112-117.
[324]景劲松,陈劲,吴沧澜.我国企业R&D国际化的现状、特点及模式.研究与发展管理,2003,15(4),41-47.
[325]李大元,项保华,陈应龙.企业动态能力及其功效：环境不确定性的影响.南开管理评论,2009,12(6),60-68.
[326]李怀祖.管理研究方法论.西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004.
[327]李晓燕,毛基业.动态能力构建——基于离岸软件外包供应商的多案例研究.管理科学学报,2010,13(11),55-64.
[328]李兴旺.动态能力理论的操作框架研究：识别、架构与形成机制.经济科学出版社,2006.
[329]林萍,谢弦.不确定环境下动态能力构成框架的理论研究——基于资源管理过程视角.重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2012,29(2),35-42.
[330]林萍.动态能力的测量及作用：来自中国企业的经验数据.中南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,15(4),533-540.
[331]刘顺忠.组织学习能力对新服务开发绩效的影响机制研究.科学学研究,2009,27(3),411-417.
[332]刘雪锋.网络嵌入性与差异化战略及企业绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[333]罗氓,刘永俊.企业动态能力丽理论架构与柯成要素.中国工业经济,2009(1),75-86.
[334]马庆国.管理统计——数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究.北京：科学出版社,2002.
[335]孟晓斌,王重鸣,杨建锋.企业动态能力理论模型研究综述.外国经济与管理,2007,29(10),9-16.
[336]孟晓斌.国际创业背景下中小企业组织动态能力及其绩效机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[337]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型.管理世界,2010(5),118-129.
[338]施瑞龙.组织学习、战略执行力与企业绩效关系研究——基于长三角地区制造业企业的实证研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2009.
[339]孙海法,刘运国,方琳.案例研究的方法论.科研管理,2004,25(2),107-112.
[340]田晓明,蒋勤峰,王重鸣.企业动态能力与企业创业绩效关系实证研究—以270家孵化企业为例分析.科学学研究,2008,26(4),812-819.
[341]王飞绒.基于组织间学习的技术联盟与企业创新绩效关系研究——以生物技术产业为例.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[342]王国荣.组织学习视角：公司核心竞争力与组织学习方式相关性研究.博士学位论文,复旦大学,2008.
[343]王国顺,胡莎.企业国际化与经营绩效：中国制造业上市公司的实证研究.系统工程,2006,24(12),80-83.
[344]王凯.突发事件下决策者的框架效应研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[345]王莉.动态环境下企业网络、组织学习和企业绩效关系研究——以济南市高新技术企业为例.博士学位论文,山东大学,2008.
[346]王志玮.企业外部知识网络嵌入性对破坏性创新绩效的影响机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[347]王重鸣.心理学研究方法.北京：人民教育出版社,1990.
[348]吴航,陈劲,金珺.新兴经济国家高技术企业技术资源与国际化关系研究——来自“中国光谷”产业园区的证据.科学学研究,2012,30(6),870-876.
[349]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务.北京：科学出版社,2003.
[350]伍蓓.企业研发外包的模式、机理及动态演化研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
[351]许军,梅姝娥.基于动态能力的电子商务价值创造研究.经济管理,2011,33(2),153-157.
[352]杨丽丽,赵进.国际化程度与企业绩效关系实证研究综述.外国经济与管理,2009,31(4),15-21.
[353]于海波,方俐洛,凌文轮.组织学习整合理论模型.心理科学进展,2004,12(2),246-255.
[354]张钢,王宇峰.组织模块性、知识基础与创新绩效——以动态能力为中介变量的实证研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,42(2),206-220.
[355]张公嵬,梁琦.出口与企业绩效：主要论题与最新进展.国际商务——对外经济贸易大学学报.2010(1),33-39.
[356]张琳.中小企业组织学习力与企业绩效关系实证研究——基于江西省的调研,博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2008.
[357]张一弛,欧怡.企业国际化的市场进入模式研究述评.经济科学,2001(4),11-19.
[358]张玉利,杨俊,任兵.社会资本、先前经验与创业机会——一个交互效应模型及其启示.管理世界,2008(7),91-102.
[359]郑素丽,章威,吴晓波.基于知识的动态能力：理论与实证.科学学研究,2010,28(3),405-411.
[360]郑素丽.组织间资源对企业创新绩效的作用机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[361]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[362]朱伟民,万迪防.基于组织学习的企业知识管理.西安交通大学学报,2001,21(4),18-20.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |