地热资源开发利用经济评价研究
|
摘要
地热资源是在当前的技术经济和地质环境条件下,可以从地壳表面下一定深度内科学、合理地开发出来的地下岩石中的地热能量和地热流体中的热能量及其伴生的有用组分。地热资源是能源家族中的新能源之一,不仅是重要的能源类矿产,又是可再生的清洁的、环境友好的绿色能源。合理的利用地热资源,是缓解资源约束和环境压力,调整和优化能源结构,提高经济增长的质量和效益,实现节约发展、清洁发展、安全发展和可持续发展,大力开发新能源,实行能源供应多元化的一项重要战略举措。
地热资源作为绿色、可再生资源,在地热丰富的我国已经得到了较好的开发和利用。全国已经基本形成了以西藏羊八井为代表的地热发电、以天津和西安为代表的地热供暖、以东南沿海为代表的疗养与旅游和以华北平原为代表的种植和养殖开发利用格局。随着我国地热资源商业化、产业化、规模化步伐加快,地热资源开发利用经济评价工作的重要性也逐渐显现。
近年来,国内外学者为地热开发利用作出了深入的研究和巨大的贡献,但是,总的来说,我国地热开发利用的经济评价的研究还比较薄弱。目前,这些研究主要的局限性表现在以下几个方面：一是,研究的方法和深度有待进一步加强。从目前的状况来看,国内外对能源经济评价方面进行的研究并不少,既有针对传统化石能源的,也有针对新能源的,但是总的来说对传统化石能源方面的研究更加深入。针对新能源的经济评价研究侧重于针对某个具体的项目作出运算和评价或者对不同方案的运算结果进行比较,总的来说,阐述比较笼统,研究的内容和方法还需完善,亟需形成一套系统的、针对性较强的评价指标体系和评价方法体系。二是,研究的对象应该细化。目前的能源项目经济评价研究的对象主要集中在不同能源或不同用能方式之间经济性的比较分析,通过对计算结果的比较选出最优方案,但优势或劣势的关键影响因素还缺乏深刻剖析,比较过程中所采用的经济评价方法针对性不强。三是,学术界对地热开发利用的研究相对薄弱,关于地热开发利用经济评价多是单独考虑技术、经济、环境、资源等因素,或者考虑其中两两组合的关系,缺乏以资源—经济—环境为系统的综合评价；关于地热开发利用的投入-产出主要是财务计算,缺乏对地热资源开发利用投入-产出的绩效研究。
论文在“中国地质调查基金项目”的支持下,从地热资源开发利用已有的评价现状入手,结合资源—经济—环境系统,提出基于DEA的地热资源开发利用经济评价模型,结合地热资源主要的开发利用方式,完成了从理论、方法到实践的过渡,为地热资源开发利用经济评价、地热产业管理和决策提供了科学的依据。
研究成果主要表现在以下几个方面：
1.对地热资源开发利用经济评价的理论基础进行了分析。把资源禀赋理论、比较优势理论和可持续发展理论作为指导地热资源开发利用的理论基础。对地热资源开发利用经济评价的作用与原则进行了分析,指出地热资源经济评价的意义在于为开发决策提供科学依据,也有利于提高地热资源的综合利用水平。结合地热资源开发利用的特点,重点讨论了影响地热资源开发利用经济评价的关键因素,主要包括地质因素、技术经济因素、社会经济因素和生态环境因素等。为选择地热资源开发利用经济评价指标和建立地热资源开发利用经济评价模型提供了理论基础。。
2.我国地热资源不同开发利用方式经济评价综合分析。对中低温地热资源的三种主要利用方式：深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能供暖、地热温泉分别进行了经济评价相关分析。分析表明,三种开发利用方式的项目对其进行评价时有不同的侧重点。深层地热水供暖项目投资大、风险高,比较侧重于净现值等财务数据的计算；浅层地温能项目经济评价注重对其节能效应的评价；地热温泉评价主要是对影响温泉开发利用的主要因素进行评价。通过分析,发现目前地热资源经济评价以单类型项目为研究对象,缺乏对各种不同开发利用方式的项目的宏观评价分析,缺乏以资源—经济—环境为系统的,能够适用于各种开发利用方式的经济评价模型。提出了建立地热资源开发利用经济评价模型的必要性。
3.基于3E-DEA地热资源开发利用经济评价指标体系模型的建立。首先,在总结分析能源—环境—经济系统理论的基础上,将能源细化为地热资源,讨论地热资源、经济、环境之间的耦合关系。其次,引入DEA模型,根据地热资源开发利用的特点和3E系统的内涵,选择适合本文使用的DEA模型：一是3E-DEA模型,将3E引入到DEA模型中；二是超效率DEA模型,由于本文决策单元数不多,而超效率模型是解决单元相对较少情况下排序问题的有效手段,故而采用。最后,建立适用于地热资源开发利用的经济评价指标体系,具体来说,定性的从投入要素：地质因索、工艺因素、财务因素中筛选出地热资源量、单井产量、总投资、运营费用和环保节能投入作为输入指标；从产出要素：经济效益和环境效益中筛选出动态投资回收期、内部收益率、节约标准煤和减少废气排放量为输出指标。在此基础上,采用改进的主成分分析法,以实际案例计算结果为根据,选择出了单井产量、投资总额、动态回收期、内部收益率和节约标准煤这5个更加科学、合理、易操作且能反映3E系统的投入产出指标。
4.实证研究。针对选取的10个典型项目(它们分别代表了深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能和温泉三大地热开发利用方式)结合DEA评价模型与新建立的指标体系,分析影响各种地热资源开发利用方式经济效益的关键因素,从更为宏观的角度对地热资源开发利用进行了评价。通过数据的分析,得出以下结论：深层地热水供暖项目调整参数为财务收益率、单井产量；对于浅层地温能项目,可以通过提高投资额和缩短投资回收期的参数来提高效率；对于地热温泉项目,可以通过提高投资额和内部收益率的参数来提高效率。采用FA软件进行DEA分析,得出DEA有效项目有2个；DEA无效项目8个。根据输出结果显示出的各项目的经济效率分值,对经济效率高的项目进行了因素贡献值分析,对经济效率低的项目展开了无效原因分析,发现无效项目中普遍存在投入水平效率损失现象,产出指标分别有不同程度的上升空间。实证结果表明,本文建立的地热资源经济评价模型可以针对不同开发方式的地热项目进行经济评价和经济效率排序,具有一定的实践操作性。
5.提出我国地热资源开发利用的优化路径——推进我国地热资源—经济—环境协调发展。项目层面,通过梯级利用、地热回灌技术方法提高地热资源利用效率和积极开发CDM项目；产业层面,通过开展我国地热资源调查评价、合理规划地热产业、建立地热产业投资基金来保障我国地热资源—经济—环境协调发展。
本文研究的主要创新点体现在以下两点：
1.以资源—经济—环境为系统,针对地热资源特点,选取科学的投入产出指标体系,建立了基于3E-超效率DEA的地热资源开发利用经济评价模型。
2.针对中低温地热资源不同的利用方式：深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能供暖和温泉旅游进行了经济评价和经济效率评价。
The geothermal resource is one of the import energies in the current technical economy and under the geology environmental condition.The geothermal energy in underground rock and heat energy with other useful containment in geothermal fluid can be reasonable developed under earth's crust surface in certain depth. The heat energy of geothermal resource partly originates from the Earth deep place high temperature lava body. Another originates the heat which produces to the radio active element decay.The geothermal resource is one of the new energies in energy family. It is not only the important energy class minerals, also is renewable, clean, the environmental friendly and green energy. The reasonable use geothermal resource is important strategic action which can alleviate the resources restraint and the environment pressure, improve the quality and the benefit which the economy grows, the realization save the development, the clean development, the safe development and the sustainable development, the adjustment and the optimized energy structure, vigorously develops the new energy, an implementation energy supply multiplication.
As a green and renewable resource, geothermal energy has been deeply developed and utilizated in China which is rich in geothermal energy. China has been basically formed a utilization pattern that represented by Tibet Yangbajing geothermal power generation, Tianjin and Xi'an as the representative of the geothermal heating, southeast coast as the representative of the spa and tourism and north China plain as the representative of the planting and breeding. With the acceleration of commercialization, industrialization and large scale of geothermal resources in our country, the importance of economic evaluation for geothermal resources exploitation and utilization also gradually revealed.
At present, the research about economic evaluation for geothermal exploitation and utilization is still in its infancy. The limitations of the research mainly displays in the following aspects:firstly, research methods and research depth needs to be further strengthened. From the current situation,there are lots of economic evaluation on energy both at home and abord, but they mostly research on the traditional fossil energy, there are also have reseach on new energy, but most of these studies only for one specific project itself which is made several indicators of the operation and evaluation or made different schemes,simple comparison of the calculation results.they research isarathernebulousterm and not formed a system of evaluation indexs and evaluation method. Secondly, the object of the research should be refined. Currently, economic evaluation is mostly focus on the economic evaluation on energy projects or different usepatterns. They only research on which projects is better through the comparison of the calculated results, key influencing factors for the advantage or disadvantage are not concrete.Thirdly,The use patten of geothermal resources have their own characteristics, the economic evaluation of the results are often not able to fully reflect the real situation of each project.
This papers from the angle of view of development and utilization status of the existing evaluation about geothermal resources, combining resources-economy-environment system, based on DEA model, combining with the development and utilization of geothermal resources mainly, completed the transition from theory to practice, form method to practice. Provides scientific date to the goverments for the management and decision made which is benifent to the exploitation and utilization for geothermal resource.
1. Making research on theories of economic evaluation of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing. This paper given summarized study on the key influential factors and current situation of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing, the theory of mineral resources developing and utilizing is reviewed in this chapter.Combining with the characteristics of geothermal resources development and utilization, making comprehensive analysis of the main influence factors of geothermal resources economic evaluation and it found out that the geological factor, the technical economic factors, social economic factors and ecological and environmental factors will affect the economic value of exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources. It provides a theoretical basis for choosing economic evaluation index of geothermal resources development and utilization based on DEA model.
2.making systmical analysis on the different ways of development and utilization of geothermal resources.it makes analysis respectively on the three main use of low temperature geothermal resources,there aredeep geothermal water heating, shallow geothermal heating and geothermal hot springs.Analysis shows that the three ways of evaluate the development and utilization project have their priorities. Deep geothermal water heating projects need large investment have high risk, therefore,it focus on the financial data such as net present value calculation; economic evaluation on shallow geothermal project should pay attention to for its energy saving effect evaluation; Evaluation of geothermal hot springs is mainly to evaluate the main factors influencing the hot spring development and utilization. Through the analysis, it found out, most economic evaluation of geothermal resources focus on a single project, the lack of a variety of different ways of development and utilization in macroscopic views.it put forward the necessity of setting up economic evaluation model of geothermal resources exploitation and utilization.
3. Set up economic evaluation index system of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-DEA.On the basis of analyzing the theory of energy-environment-economy system, refining the index of resources with geothermal energy, coupling the relationship between economy and environment.summaried the main models and methods of energy-environment-economy system and finding out the model method's limitations. From the perspective of the relations between the inputs-output, by using DEA model make economic evaluation on the development and utilization of geothermal resources. Choicing the suitable DEA model which were used in this article, there are economic evaluation index system of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-DEA and Super efficiency DEA model. Super efficiency model is used to solve unit scheduling problem which is with relatively few cases. Focus on the two economic indicators:costs and yields. Geothermal cost including environmental cost; through adjustment of the economic parameters, studied the two influence factor to geothermal development such as cost and investment. Constructing suitable index system to meet the characteristics of the geothermal resources, expand the limitations of the traditional project economic evaluation method which making economic evaluation about geothermal resources development and utilization is more scientific. Through empirical analysis to the key influencing factors of geothermal resources exploitation and utilization, to make a evaluation of the development and utilization of geothermal resources from a more macro point of view. The five indicators have been fully tested in the influencing factors of geothermal exploitation and utilization and combining with the connotation of resources-economy environment, have certainscientificalness. According to the main factors influencing the value of geothermal resources development and utilization project, combined with the connotation of the3E and DEA evaluation model a newly established index system is established, through a practical example, the model was used to study the different ways of using geothermal development project plan, analysis the key factors which impacts the evaluation about geothermal resources development and utilization, to make a evaluation of the development and utilization of geothermal resources from a more macro point of view.Explore index system of economic evaluation which is suited to the characteristics of the geothermal resources development and utilization project, expand the limitations of the traditional economic evaluation method on project and makes the economic evaluation on geothermal resources development and utilization more scientific.
4.Using data envelopment analysis setting up economic evaluation model of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing.according to the different ways and utilization of geothermal resources, selectted10representative projects including high-temperature geothermalwater,shallow geotheermal energyand hot spring projects as the research objects (namely decision-making unit), and then makes input-output research based on the evaluation model.The key point to a model lies in the choice of indicators, combining with the characteristics of geothermal, this article selects the single well production, total investment, dynamic payback period, financial internal rate of return and environmental benefits as input and output indicators. On the basis of previous research, using FA software to evaluate the efficiency of geothermal resources development and utilization then makes efficiency analysis on the operation results. According to the FA software there are2DEA effective project and8DEA invalid projects. The output shows the score of economic efficiency, and contribution to value analysis based on economic efficiency project, finds out the causes which makes the economic efficiency low. Loss phenomenon is widespread in the input level. There is cetain degree rise space in the output indicators.
5. Optimization path of exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources in China is put forward.on the views of porject,promoting the coordinated development of the geothermal resources-economy-environment, there are multi-purpose on the resource, cascade utilization and geothermal injection to improve the efficiency of geothermal resources and technology actively;on the views of industry level, by conducting investigation and evaluation on geothermal resources,to plan the geothermal industry reasonablely and to set up the geothermal industry investment fund to safeguard geothermal resources-environment-economy coordinating developed.
The innovation of this paper is mainly indicated on two aspects as follows:
1.According to the characteristics of geothermal resources, combing with Resources-economy-environment system,selection scientific input and output index, setting up economic evaluation model of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-super efficiency DEA.
2. Making economic evaluation and economic efficiency evaluation in view of the different ways of using low-temperature geothermal resources:deep geothermal water heating, shallow geothermal heating and hot spring tourism.
地热资源作为绿色、可再生资源,在地热丰富的我国已经得到了较好的开发和利用。全国已经基本形成了以西藏羊八井为代表的地热发电、以天津和西安为代表的地热供暖、以东南沿海为代表的疗养与旅游和以华北平原为代表的种植和养殖开发利用格局。随着我国地热资源商业化、产业化、规模化步伐加快,地热资源开发利用经济评价工作的重要性也逐渐显现。
近年来,国内外学者为地热开发利用作出了深入的研究和巨大的贡献,但是,总的来说,我国地热开发利用的经济评价的研究还比较薄弱。目前,这些研究主要的局限性表现在以下几个方面：一是,研究的方法和深度有待进一步加强。从目前的状况来看,国内外对能源经济评价方面进行的研究并不少,既有针对传统化石能源的,也有针对新能源的,但是总的来说对传统化石能源方面的研究更加深入。针对新能源的经济评价研究侧重于针对某个具体的项目作出运算和评价或者对不同方案的运算结果进行比较,总的来说,阐述比较笼统,研究的内容和方法还需完善,亟需形成一套系统的、针对性较强的评价指标体系和评价方法体系。二是,研究的对象应该细化。目前的能源项目经济评价研究的对象主要集中在不同能源或不同用能方式之间经济性的比较分析,通过对计算结果的比较选出最优方案,但优势或劣势的关键影响因素还缺乏深刻剖析,比较过程中所采用的经济评价方法针对性不强。三是,学术界对地热开发利用的研究相对薄弱,关于地热开发利用经济评价多是单独考虑技术、经济、环境、资源等因素,或者考虑其中两两组合的关系,缺乏以资源—经济—环境为系统的综合评价；关于地热开发利用的投入-产出主要是财务计算,缺乏对地热资源开发利用投入-产出的绩效研究。
论文在“中国地质调查基金项目”的支持下,从地热资源开发利用已有的评价现状入手,结合资源—经济—环境系统,提出基于DEA的地热资源开发利用经济评价模型,结合地热资源主要的开发利用方式,完成了从理论、方法到实践的过渡,为地热资源开发利用经济评价、地热产业管理和决策提供了科学的依据。
研究成果主要表现在以下几个方面：
1.对地热资源开发利用经济评价的理论基础进行了分析。把资源禀赋理论、比较优势理论和可持续发展理论作为指导地热资源开发利用的理论基础。对地热资源开发利用经济评价的作用与原则进行了分析,指出地热资源经济评价的意义在于为开发决策提供科学依据,也有利于提高地热资源的综合利用水平。结合地热资源开发利用的特点,重点讨论了影响地热资源开发利用经济评价的关键因素,主要包括地质因素、技术经济因素、社会经济因素和生态环境因素等。为选择地热资源开发利用经济评价指标和建立地热资源开发利用经济评价模型提供了理论基础。。
2.我国地热资源不同开发利用方式经济评价综合分析。对中低温地热资源的三种主要利用方式：深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能供暖、地热温泉分别进行了经济评价相关分析。分析表明,三种开发利用方式的项目对其进行评价时有不同的侧重点。深层地热水供暖项目投资大、风险高,比较侧重于净现值等财务数据的计算；浅层地温能项目经济评价注重对其节能效应的评价；地热温泉评价主要是对影响温泉开发利用的主要因素进行评价。通过分析,发现目前地热资源经济评价以单类型项目为研究对象,缺乏对各种不同开发利用方式的项目的宏观评价分析,缺乏以资源—经济—环境为系统的,能够适用于各种开发利用方式的经济评价模型。提出了建立地热资源开发利用经济评价模型的必要性。
3.基于3E-DEA地热资源开发利用经济评价指标体系模型的建立。首先,在总结分析能源—环境—经济系统理论的基础上,将能源细化为地热资源,讨论地热资源、经济、环境之间的耦合关系。其次,引入DEA模型,根据地热资源开发利用的特点和3E系统的内涵,选择适合本文使用的DEA模型：一是3E-DEA模型,将3E引入到DEA模型中；二是超效率DEA模型,由于本文决策单元数不多,而超效率模型是解决单元相对较少情况下排序问题的有效手段,故而采用。最后,建立适用于地热资源开发利用的经济评价指标体系,具体来说,定性的从投入要素：地质因索、工艺因素、财务因素中筛选出地热资源量、单井产量、总投资、运营费用和环保节能投入作为输入指标；从产出要素：经济效益和环境效益中筛选出动态投资回收期、内部收益率、节约标准煤和减少废气排放量为输出指标。在此基础上,采用改进的主成分分析法,以实际案例计算结果为根据,选择出了单井产量、投资总额、动态回收期、内部收益率和节约标准煤这5个更加科学、合理、易操作且能反映3E系统的投入产出指标。
4.实证研究。针对选取的10个典型项目(它们分别代表了深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能和温泉三大地热开发利用方式)结合DEA评价模型与新建立的指标体系,分析影响各种地热资源开发利用方式经济效益的关键因素,从更为宏观的角度对地热资源开发利用进行了评价。通过数据的分析,得出以下结论：深层地热水供暖项目调整参数为财务收益率、单井产量；对于浅层地温能项目,可以通过提高投资额和缩短投资回收期的参数来提高效率；对于地热温泉项目,可以通过提高投资额和内部收益率的参数来提高效率。采用FA软件进行DEA分析,得出DEA有效项目有2个；DEA无效项目8个。根据输出结果显示出的各项目的经济效率分值,对经济效率高的项目进行了因素贡献值分析,对经济效率低的项目展开了无效原因分析,发现无效项目中普遍存在投入水平效率损失现象,产出指标分别有不同程度的上升空间。实证结果表明,本文建立的地热资源经济评价模型可以针对不同开发方式的地热项目进行经济评价和经济效率排序,具有一定的实践操作性。
5.提出我国地热资源开发利用的优化路径——推进我国地热资源—经济—环境协调发展。项目层面,通过梯级利用、地热回灌技术方法提高地热资源利用效率和积极开发CDM项目；产业层面,通过开展我国地热资源调查评价、合理规划地热产业、建立地热产业投资基金来保障我国地热资源—经济—环境协调发展。
本文研究的主要创新点体现在以下两点：
1.以资源—经济—环境为系统,针对地热资源特点,选取科学的投入产出指标体系,建立了基于3E-超效率DEA的地热资源开发利用经济评价模型。
2.针对中低温地热资源不同的利用方式：深层地热水供暖、浅层地温能供暖和温泉旅游进行了经济评价和经济效率评价。
The geothermal resource is one of the import energies in the current technical economy and under the geology environmental condition.The geothermal energy in underground rock and heat energy with other useful containment in geothermal fluid can be reasonable developed under earth's crust surface in certain depth. The heat energy of geothermal resource partly originates from the Earth deep place high temperature lava body. Another originates the heat which produces to the radio active element decay.The geothermal resource is one of the new energies in energy family. It is not only the important energy class minerals, also is renewable, clean, the environmental friendly and green energy. The reasonable use geothermal resource is important strategic action which can alleviate the resources restraint and the environment pressure, improve the quality and the benefit which the economy grows, the realization save the development, the clean development, the safe development and the sustainable development, the adjustment and the optimized energy structure, vigorously develops the new energy, an implementation energy supply multiplication.
As a green and renewable resource, geothermal energy has been deeply developed and utilizated in China which is rich in geothermal energy. China has been basically formed a utilization pattern that represented by Tibet Yangbajing geothermal power generation, Tianjin and Xi'an as the representative of the geothermal heating, southeast coast as the representative of the spa and tourism and north China plain as the representative of the planting and breeding. With the acceleration of commercialization, industrialization and large scale of geothermal resources in our country, the importance of economic evaluation for geothermal resources exploitation and utilization also gradually revealed.
At present, the research about economic evaluation for geothermal exploitation and utilization is still in its infancy. The limitations of the research mainly displays in the following aspects:firstly, research methods and research depth needs to be further strengthened. From the current situation,there are lots of economic evaluation on energy both at home and abord, but they mostly research on the traditional fossil energy, there are also have reseach on new energy, but most of these studies only for one specific project itself which is made several indicators of the operation and evaluation or made different schemes,simple comparison of the calculation results.they research isarathernebulousterm and not formed a system of evaluation indexs and evaluation method. Secondly, the object of the research should be refined. Currently, economic evaluation is mostly focus on the economic evaluation on energy projects or different usepatterns. They only research on which projects is better through the comparison of the calculated results, key influencing factors for the advantage or disadvantage are not concrete.Thirdly,The use patten of geothermal resources have their own characteristics, the economic evaluation of the results are often not able to fully reflect the real situation of each project.
This papers from the angle of view of development and utilization status of the existing evaluation about geothermal resources, combining resources-economy-environment system, based on DEA model, combining with the development and utilization of geothermal resources mainly, completed the transition from theory to practice, form method to practice. Provides scientific date to the goverments for the management and decision made which is benifent to the exploitation and utilization for geothermal resource.
1. Making research on theories of economic evaluation of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing. This paper given summarized study on the key influential factors and current situation of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing, the theory of mineral resources developing and utilizing is reviewed in this chapter.Combining with the characteristics of geothermal resources development and utilization, making comprehensive analysis of the main influence factors of geothermal resources economic evaluation and it found out that the geological factor, the technical economic factors, social economic factors and ecological and environmental factors will affect the economic value of exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources. It provides a theoretical basis for choosing economic evaluation index of geothermal resources development and utilization based on DEA model.
2.making systmical analysis on the different ways of development and utilization of geothermal resources.it makes analysis respectively on the three main use of low temperature geothermal resources,there aredeep geothermal water heating, shallow geothermal heating and geothermal hot springs.Analysis shows that the three ways of evaluate the development and utilization project have their priorities. Deep geothermal water heating projects need large investment have high risk, therefore,it focus on the financial data such as net present value calculation; economic evaluation on shallow geothermal project should pay attention to for its energy saving effect evaluation; Evaluation of geothermal hot springs is mainly to evaluate the main factors influencing the hot spring development and utilization. Through the analysis, it found out, most economic evaluation of geothermal resources focus on a single project, the lack of a variety of different ways of development and utilization in macroscopic views.it put forward the necessity of setting up economic evaluation model of geothermal resources exploitation and utilization.
3. Set up economic evaluation index system of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-DEA.On the basis of analyzing the theory of energy-environment-economy system, refining the index of resources with geothermal energy, coupling the relationship between economy and environment.summaried the main models and methods of energy-environment-economy system and finding out the model method's limitations. From the perspective of the relations between the inputs-output, by using DEA model make economic evaluation on the development and utilization of geothermal resources. Choicing the suitable DEA model which were used in this article, there are economic evaluation index system of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-DEA and Super efficiency DEA model. Super efficiency model is used to solve unit scheduling problem which is with relatively few cases. Focus on the two economic indicators:costs and yields. Geothermal cost including environmental cost; through adjustment of the economic parameters, studied the two influence factor to geothermal development such as cost and investment. Constructing suitable index system to meet the characteristics of the geothermal resources, expand the limitations of the traditional project economic evaluation method which making economic evaluation about geothermal resources development and utilization is more scientific. Through empirical analysis to the key influencing factors of geothermal resources exploitation and utilization, to make a evaluation of the development and utilization of geothermal resources from a more macro point of view. The five indicators have been fully tested in the influencing factors of geothermal exploitation and utilization and combining with the connotation of resources-economy environment, have certainscientificalness. According to the main factors influencing the value of geothermal resources development and utilization project, combined with the connotation of the3E and DEA evaluation model a newly established index system is established, through a practical example, the model was used to study the different ways of using geothermal development project plan, analysis the key factors which impacts the evaluation about geothermal resources development and utilization, to make a evaluation of the development and utilization of geothermal resources from a more macro point of view.Explore index system of economic evaluation which is suited to the characteristics of the geothermal resources development and utilization project, expand the limitations of the traditional economic evaluation method on project and makes the economic evaluation on geothermal resources development and utilization more scientific.
4.Using data envelopment analysis setting up economic evaluation model of geotheermal energy developing and utilizing.according to the different ways and utilization of geothermal resources, selectted10representative projects including high-temperature geothermalwater,shallow geotheermal energyand hot spring projects as the research objects (namely decision-making unit), and then makes input-output research based on the evaluation model.The key point to a model lies in the choice of indicators, combining with the characteristics of geothermal, this article selects the single well production, total investment, dynamic payback period, financial internal rate of return and environmental benefits as input and output indicators. On the basis of previous research, using FA software to evaluate the efficiency of geothermal resources development and utilization then makes efficiency analysis on the operation results. According to the FA software there are2DEA effective project and8DEA invalid projects. The output shows the score of economic efficiency, and contribution to value analysis based on economic efficiency project, finds out the causes which makes the economic efficiency low. Loss phenomenon is widespread in the input level. There is cetain degree rise space in the output indicators.
5. Optimization path of exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources in China is put forward.on the views of porject,promoting the coordinated development of the geothermal resources-economy-environment, there are multi-purpose on the resource, cascade utilization and geothermal injection to improve the efficiency of geothermal resources and technology actively;on the views of industry level, by conducting investigation and evaluation on geothermal resources,to plan the geothermal industry reasonablely and to set up the geothermal industry investment fund to safeguard geothermal resources-environment-economy coordinating developed.
The innovation of this paper is mainly indicated on two aspects as follows:
1.According to the characteristics of geothermal resources, combing with Resources-economy-environment system,selection scientific input and output index, setting up economic evaluation model of geothermal resources development and utilization based on3E-super efficiency DEA.
2. Making economic evaluation and economic efficiency evaluation in view of the different ways of using low-temperature geothermal resources:deep geothermal water heating, shallow geothermal heating and hot spring tourism.
引文
[1]谢和平.发展低碳技术、推进绿色经济[J].中国能源,2010(9)：5-10.
[2]郑克棪.中国地热能开发的新进展[C].全国地热资源开发利用与保护考察研讨会论文集.北京：地质出版社,2008.
[3]杨红亮,郑康彬,郑克棪,等.中国浅层地热能规模化开发与利用[C].北京：地质出版社,2010.
[4]栾英波,郑桂森,卫万顺.浅层地温能资源开发利用发展综述[J].地质与勘探,2013(2)：379-383.
[5]海松.详解《节能中长期专项规划》——国家发改委能源研究所能源效率中心主任郁聪访谈[J].国际石油经济,2005(2)：17-21+71.
[6]郭丽华.地热资源开发产业投资基金研究[D].吉林：吉林大学,2009.
[7]刘志东,徐淼.国外投资项目经济评价理论与方法体系比较研究[J].生产力研究,2007(4)：17-18+20.
[8]赵淑琴.地勘经济评价中的价格选择[J].河北地质学院学报,1990(4)：482-490.
[9]杨华均,杨庆媛谢德体，等.工程项目社会影响评价的回顾与展望[J].中国农学通报，2007(8)：588-593.
[10]刘晓峰.基于多属性决策的投资项目经济评价研究[D].天津：天津大学,2007.
[11]刘春林..建设项目经济评价简释[N].中国建设报.2012-7-31.
[12]杨砚,杨桦.建设项目经济评价方法与参数综述[J].四川食品与发酵,2007(2)：14-18.
[13]毛明来.和谐理念下的投资项目经济评价研究[D].天津：天津大学,2007.
[14]王志伟.关于宏观经济学的微观基础问题[J].当代财经,2009(1)：20-25.
[15]杨静.“经济人”假设的发展与批判[C].全国高校社会主义经济理论与实践研讨会第20次会议论文集,2006.
[16]李春梅,党志良.公共项目经济评价新方法初探[J].水利经济,2003(5)：51-53.
[17]冯为民,任宏,曲成平,等.建设项目综合评价体系及模型研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2004(6)：103-107+111.
[18]张学军,黄山.项目决策数学模型研究及算法实现[JJ.兰州交通大学学报,2005(6)：56-58.
[19]齐学玲,穆浩,齐金生.地热供暖系统经济性模型设计[J].暖通空调,2011(3)：112-117+37.
[20]张志江.论高炉渣处理系统的有效节能措施[C].2011年河北省炼铁技术暨学术年会论文集,2011.
[21]柴立龙,马承伟,张晓蕙等.地源热泵温室降温系统的试验研究与性能分析[C].中国设施农业可持续发展论文集,2010.
[22]贾孟立,侯中兰,赵廷林,等.地源热泵与常规供暖的经济性比较[J].可再生能源,2005(5)：74-75.
[23]孔维臻,余瑞祥,陈宁.基于净现值法的地热供暖项目投资分析[J].中国矿业,2012(9)：8-11+23.
[24]胡业范,谈宏莹,张永贵.热泵供热系统的评价方法[J].建筑科学,2009(10)：45-48.
[25]许淑惠,邢云绯.地源热泵—供热空调特性及技术经济分析[J].北京建筑工程学院学报,2002(4)：26-29.
[26]梅奎,张小松.地源热泵热水系统设计及经济性分析[J].制冷与空调,2009(4)：53-57.
[27]吴伯谦.土壤源热泵实验研究与经济性分析[D].武汉：华中科技大学,2006.
[28]王冠贤,保继刚.温泉旅游地特性及空间竞争分析——以从化新旧温泉为例[J].地域研究与开发,2004(6)：83-87+122.
[29]王艳平,山村顺次.中国温泉资源旅游利用形式的变迁及其开发现状[J].地理科学，2002(1)：102-109.
[30]王华,彭华.温泉旅游的发展与研究述评[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2004(4)：30-34.
[31]王爱娥.湖南省温泉酒店投资环境评价研究[D].湖南：湖南师范大学,2009.
[32]刘继芬,王景甫,马重芳,等.中低温地热发电循环参数的优化[J].化工学报,2011(S1)：190-196.
[33]李云,张兵强.地热用于油田集输伴热及发电的经济性分析[J].煤气与热力,2009(1)：5-7.
[34]K HN M V B G.J.W. E A COCKERILL T T.Combined technical and economic evaluationof the Northern European offshore wind resource.[J].Journal of Wind Engineering andIndustrial Aerodynamics,2001.
[35]马立杰.DEA理论及应用研究[D].山东：山东大学,2007.
[36]YANG WAN-FA MA HWONG-WEN et al HUNG MING-LUNG.A novel multiobjective programming approach dealing with qualitative and quantitative objectives for environmental management[J].Ecological Economics,2006.
[37]LIU JUN ELHAG. T M S WANG YING-MING.An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008.
[38]CHENG H L. EDDIE W L.Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection[J].Building and Environment,2004.
[39]JYOTI K P MUDIT KULSHRESHTHA.Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in India:a DEA analysis.[J].Energy Economics,2002
[40]马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].科学出版社：北京,2010.
[41]田延山.中国地热资源及开发利用[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[42]张驰.地热的成本、环境影响和可持续性[J].中国科技信息,2004(8)：18-21.
[43]徐世光,郭远生.地热学基础[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[44]多吉,范小平.加强地热开发政策保障力度、确保地热开发可持续发展[C].中国地热能：成就与展望——李四光倡导中国地热能开发利用40周年纪念大会暨中国地热发展研讨会论文集.北京：地质出版社,2010.
[45]庄少勤.大力推广浅层地热开发利用、促进生态环境与经济建设协调发展[J].上海国土资源,2011(2)：16-17+39.
[46]祁进成.地热开发前景广阔[N].中国环境报.2013(3).
[47]郭丽华.我国地热资源开发中发展循环经济的思考[J].中国集体经济,2008(24)：30-31.
[48]郑斓.中国地热资源开发利用的经济意义[J].中小企业管理与科技(上旬刊),2008(11)：114.
[49]祖文超,戎卫国,左庭荣,等.地埋管地源热泵系统设计及其经济性分析[J].制冷空调与电力机械.2009.
[50]王春宏.湖南省新邵县大新金矿开发利用的经济评价研究[D].北京大学(北京),2009.
[51]陈玉华.基于DEA的煤层气经济评价模型研究[D].北京国矿业大学,2010.
[52]刁凤琴.石油储量动态经济评价研究[D].武汉国地质大学,2007.
[53]张培民.地源热泵系统的技术经济及环保效益综合评价[D].北京华大学,2011.
[54]朱家玲.地热能开发与应用技术.北京：化学工业出版社,2006.
[55]张国辉.地源热泵系统技术经济性评价研究[D].武汉：武汉理工大学,2012.
[56]庄运超.复合地源热泵系统的长期经济运行策略研究[D].湖南]：湖南工业大学,2012.
[57]王坤,赵娜,刘洋,等.地热资源循环利用和回灌技术示范研究[Z].2011.
[58]L.M.EDWARDS地热能源手册[M].北京：地质出版社,2000.
[59]齐学玲,齐金生,穆浩.天津津南农业科技园区地热利用工程[M].北京：地质出版社,2005.
[60]王树芳.地热能源在新农村建设中的应用——以河北省雄县为例[J].安徽农业科学,2012(30)：14895-14896+14936.
[61]林黎,孙宝成,赵苏民,等.地热资源开发利用的地质环境问题探讨[C].中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会2007年学术年会暨“生态环境脆弱区工程地质”学术论坛论文集.北京：科学出版社,2007.
[62]朱家玲,张凤山.地热供暖节能潜力与环境效益动态分析[J].太阳能学报,2000(3)：321-326.
[63]昝成,孟富春,董明.地热+高温水源热泵区域供暖工程环境影响分析[J].工程建设与设计,2006(7)：13-15.
[64]申建梅,陈宗宇,张古彬.地热开发利用过程中的环境效应及环境保护[J].地球报,1998(4)：67-73.
[65]林黎,孙宝成,赵苏民.天津地区地热流体开发利用中的环境质量问题[C].全国地热产业可持续发展学术研讨会论文集.北京：化学工业出版社,2005.
[66]胡先才，孙继东,姚中华,等.西藏地热活动与开发对地质环境的影响[J].山地学报，003(S 1)：45-48.
[67]孙艺伟.地热资源的利用及其面临的若干问题[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2010(10)：44-47.
[68]苏艳.关中盆地中部地压型地热流体环境同位素水文地球化学特征研究[D].西安：长安大学,2008.
[69]贺玉龙,杨立中,熊春梅.地热开发过程中的主要工程环境问题[J].环境与可持续发展,2008(5)：42-44.
[70]尤伟静,刘延锋,郭明晶.地热资源开发利用过程中的主要环境问题[J].安全与环境工程,2013(2)：24-28+34.
[71]张阿玲,李继峰.构建中国的能源-经济-环境系统评价模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007(9)：1537-1540.
[72]赵芳.基于3E协调的能源发展政策研究[D].北京：中国海洋大学,2008.
[73]王俊岭,赵瑞芬,王贤.能源-经济-环境(3E)系统和谐度评价研究——以河北省为例[J].经济与管理,2012,v.26；No.220(9)：94-97.
[74]郭小哲.能源经济环境系统综合模型研究[C]//北京航空航天大学出版社(Beihang University Press),2009.
[75]邓玲玲.能源—经济—环境(3E)系统协调度评价及其影响因素研究[D].湖南：湖南大学,2012.
[76]Marie-Laure BOUGNOL,Jose H. DULa. Validating Dea as a Ranking Tool:an Application of Dea to Assess Performance in Higher Education[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2006(1).
[77]Ben Soltane BASSEM.Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions in the Mediterranean:an Application of Dea[J]. Transformation research review,2008(2).
[78]Thomas R. SEXTON,Herbert F. LEWIS.Two-stage Dea:an Application to Major League Baseball[J]. Journal of productivity analysis,2003(2).
[79]刘璟,王涛,王国贞.基于DEA的河北省能源-经济-环境协调评价研究[J].商场现代化,2010,No.619(22)：97.
[80]Valter BOLJUNcIc.Sensitivity Analysis of an Efficient Dmu in Dea Model with Variable Returns to Scale (vrs)[J]. Journal of productivity analysis,2006(1):.
[81]王红岩.公共项目经济评价体系研究[D].辽宁：东北财经大学,2007.
[82]王燕妮.经济附加值(EVA)的理论方法与企业应用研究[D].西安：西北农林科技大学,2003.
[83]魏权龄.评价相对有效性的数据包络分析模DEA和网络DEA[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[84]高俊强.投资项目经济评价指标分析[J].南宁职业技术学院学报,2008(3)：65-68.
[85]吴祖源.关于建设项目经济评价指标的几个问题[J].煤炭经济研究,1998(7)：48-50.
[86]孙雷.主成分分析法和模糊综合分析法在水质评价中的实例比较[J].环境科学与管理,2011(8)：178-181.
[87]李松,邸彦彪,贺婧.主成分分析法用于可持续发展综合评价的探讨[J].辽宁工学院学报(社会科学版),2005(5)：21=23.
[88]黄庭.基于多目标优化的矿产资源经济评价模型及其实证研究[D].武汉：中国地质大学,2010.
[89]许淑娜,李长坡.对主成分分析法三个问题的剖析[J].数学理论与应用,2011(4)：116-121.
[90]Anon.Dea Model-Extensions [J].Service Productivity Management,2006(10):45-49.
[91]Marie-Laure BOUGNOL, Jose H. DULa. Validating Dea as a Ranking Tool:an Application of Dea to Assess Performance in Higher Education [J]. Research on Chronicle Operation, 2006(1):66-69.
[92]Gary D. FERRIER, Michael D. ROSKO,Vivian G. VALDMANIS.Analysis of Uncompensated Hospital Care Using a Dea Model of Output Congestion[J]. Health Care Management Science, 2006(2):34-38.
[93]W. W. COOPER,R. G. THOMPSON,R. M. THRALL.Chapter 1 Introduction:Extensions and New Developments in Dea[J]. Research on Chronicle Operation,1996(1):56-60.
[94]Lucinda DIRVEN.The Author of De Dea Syria and His Cultural Heritage[J]. Patron Saint, 1997(2)32-37.
[95]Jiaoping YANG, Hongxia ZHAO.Fuzzy Super-efficiency Dea Model and Its Application: Based on Fuzzy Structured Element [J].Fuzzy Information and Engineering 2010, 2010(7):71-75.
[96]Jan LARSSON, Kjetil TELLE.Consequences of the Ippc's Bat Requirements for Emissions and Abatement Costs:a Dea Analysis on Norwegian Data [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008(4):36-40.
[97]Erik BIORN,Terje P. HAGEN,Tor IVERSEN, et al.The Effect of Activity-based Financing on Hospital Efficiency:a Panel Data Analysis of Dea Efficiency Scores 1992-2000[J]. Health Care Management Science,2003(4):111-119.
[98]Lukas STEINMANN, Peter ZWEIFEL.The Range Adjusted Measure (ram) in Dea:Comment [J]. Productivity Analysis,2001(2):121-128.
[99]Anon.Dea Concepts for Managers [J].Service Productivity Management,2006(10):79-88.
[100]Shao-Jen WENG, Teresa WU, Jennifer BLACKHURST, et al.An Extended Dea Model for Hospital Performance Evaluation and Improvement [J]. Public Medical and Health Services, 2008(1):66-72.
[101]L. N. GVAZAVA.Dea Cetyllanatoside a From the Leaves of Digitalis Ciliata [J] Chemistry of Natural Compounds,1977(2):101-108.
[102]M. KAFFARNIK,H. MAUCH,A. ROTH.Quantification Ofmycobacterium Tuberculosis Dna Using Pcr and a Simple Dot Blot-based Dna Enzyme Assay (dea)[J].Experientia,1996(4):96-103.
[103]Gao CHONG, Zhang JIAN-ZE, Li XIAO-DONG.Technical Efficiency Analysis of New Energy Listed Companies Based on Dea [J].Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, 2010(12):45-51.
[104]Karl-Heinz LEITNER, Julia PRIKOSZOVITS, Michaela SCHAFFHAUSER-LINZATTI, et al.The Impact of Size and Specialisation on Universities' Department Performance:a Dea Analysis Applied to Austrian Universities [J]. Higher Education,2007(4):39-46.
[105]Joe ZHU.Non-radial Dea Models and Dea with Preference [J].Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking,2009(9):131-140.
[106]袁以美,叶合欣.MATLAB在经济评价中的应用[J].水利科技与经济,2004(3)：142-144.
[107]熊焰,余石.Matlab在经济系统参数确定中的应用[J].中南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2003(2)：97-99.
[108]王书文，乐永生MATLAB在确定管道造价公式经济参数中的应用[J].山西建筑2010(29)：250-251.
[109]刘勇,白林.基于MATLAB的回归分析模型在经济预测分析中的应用[J].中国管理信息化,2008(5)：69-71.
[110]陶孟章,徐倜凡.使用Matlab/GUI功能设计动力性经济型计算软件[J].中国科技信息,2008(13)：97-99.
[111]王焱.在MATLAB环境下经济预测神经网络模型的建立[J].辽宁经济管理干部学院学报,2000(1)：33-35.
[112]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会地热开发与管理：福建省连江县.中国温泉之乡专辑，2009(31).
[113]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：天津市东丽.中国温泉之乡专辑,2009(34).
[114]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：贵州省石迁县.中国温泉之乡专辑,2010(36).
[115]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会地热开发与管理：安徽省巢湖市.中国温泉之乡专辑,2010(37).
[116]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：北京金隅凤山温泉.中国5A级温泉度假村专辑,2011(42).
[117]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理,2011(44).
[118]Richard W.Asplund清洁能源投资[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2009.
[119]张陆洋.风险投资导论[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,2007.
[120]张延军等.基于岩土工程的地源热泵研究热点及回顾.地温资源与地源热泵技术应用论文集[M].北京：地质出版社.
[121]刘时斌主编.地热资源及其开发利用和保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2005.
[122]毛战坡,王雨春,王世岩等.环境影响评价与管理实务大全[M].中国水利水电出版社.2008.
[123]沈洪艳,崔建升.环境影响评价实用技术与方法[M].中国石化出社,2011.
[124]国家发展改革委建设部.建设项目经济评价方法与参数(第三版)[M].中国计划出版社, 2006.
[125]刘颖春,刘立群.技术经济学[M].化学工业出版社,2010.
[126]张先治,陈友邦.财务分析[M].东北财经大学出版社,2010.
[127]蔡义汉.地热直接利用[M].天津大学出版社,2004.
[128]王贵玲,蔺文静.浅层地热资源的基本内涵与资源勘查评价的基本理念[C].浅层地温(热)能资源特性及评价方法对地源热泵工程的研讨会论文集.2008.
[129]宾德智.对我国地热资源开发利用的几点建议[C].中国地热能：成就与展望----李四光倡导中国地热能开发利用40周年纪念大会暨中国地热研讨会论文集.2010.
[130]骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中集中标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004(9)：51-60.
[131]臧海洋.沈阳城区地下水源热泵适宜性评价及应用模式研究[D].沈阳建筑大学.2011.
[132]刘晓峰,陈通.多属性决策视角下的投资项目经济评价[J].统计与决策,2010(19)：70-73.
[133]徐金泉.《建设项目经济评价方法与参数》第三版解读[J].中国工程咨询,2006(10)：8-11.
[134]罗萍.油气开发项目经济评价方法与参数修订的几点建议[J].内蒙古石油化工,2009(2)：34-35.
[2]郑克棪.中国地热能开发的新进展[C].全国地热资源开发利用与保护考察研讨会论文集.北京：地质出版社,2008.
[3]杨红亮,郑康彬,郑克棪,等.中国浅层地热能规模化开发与利用[C].北京：地质出版社,2010.
[4]栾英波,郑桂森,卫万顺.浅层地温能资源开发利用发展综述[J].地质与勘探,2013(2)：379-383.
[5]海松.详解《节能中长期专项规划》——国家发改委能源研究所能源效率中心主任郁聪访谈[J].国际石油经济,2005(2)：17-21+71.
[6]郭丽华.地热资源开发产业投资基金研究[D].吉林：吉林大学,2009.
[7]刘志东,徐淼.国外投资项目经济评价理论与方法体系比较研究[J].生产力研究,2007(4)：17-18+20.
[8]赵淑琴.地勘经济评价中的价格选择[J].河北地质学院学报,1990(4)：482-490.
[9]杨华均,杨庆媛谢德体，等.工程项目社会影响评价的回顾与展望[J].中国农学通报，2007(8)：588-593.
[10]刘晓峰.基于多属性决策的投资项目经济评价研究[D].天津：天津大学,2007.
[11]刘春林..建设项目经济评价简释[N].中国建设报.2012-7-31.
[12]杨砚,杨桦.建设项目经济评价方法与参数综述[J].四川食品与发酵,2007(2)：14-18.
[13]毛明来.和谐理念下的投资项目经济评价研究[D].天津：天津大学,2007.
[14]王志伟.关于宏观经济学的微观基础问题[J].当代财经,2009(1)：20-25.
[15]杨静.“经济人”假设的发展与批判[C].全国高校社会主义经济理论与实践研讨会第20次会议论文集,2006.
[16]李春梅,党志良.公共项目经济评价新方法初探[J].水利经济,2003(5)：51-53.
[17]冯为民,任宏,曲成平,等.建设项目综合评价体系及模型研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2004(6)：103-107+111.
[18]张学军,黄山.项目决策数学模型研究及算法实现[JJ.兰州交通大学学报,2005(6)：56-58.
[19]齐学玲,穆浩,齐金生.地热供暖系统经济性模型设计[J].暖通空调,2011(3)：112-117+37.
[20]张志江.论高炉渣处理系统的有效节能措施[C].2011年河北省炼铁技术暨学术年会论文集,2011.
[21]柴立龙,马承伟,张晓蕙等.地源热泵温室降温系统的试验研究与性能分析[C].中国设施农业可持续发展论文集,2010.
[22]贾孟立,侯中兰,赵廷林,等.地源热泵与常规供暖的经济性比较[J].可再生能源,2005(5)：74-75.
[23]孔维臻,余瑞祥,陈宁.基于净现值法的地热供暖项目投资分析[J].中国矿业,2012(9)：8-11+23.
[24]胡业范,谈宏莹,张永贵.热泵供热系统的评价方法[J].建筑科学,2009(10)：45-48.
[25]许淑惠,邢云绯.地源热泵—供热空调特性及技术经济分析[J].北京建筑工程学院学报,2002(4)：26-29.
[26]梅奎,张小松.地源热泵热水系统设计及经济性分析[J].制冷与空调,2009(4)：53-57.
[27]吴伯谦.土壤源热泵实验研究与经济性分析[D].武汉：华中科技大学,2006.
[28]王冠贤,保继刚.温泉旅游地特性及空间竞争分析——以从化新旧温泉为例[J].地域研究与开发,2004(6)：83-87+122.
[29]王艳平,山村顺次.中国温泉资源旅游利用形式的变迁及其开发现状[J].地理科学，2002(1)：102-109.
[30]王华,彭华.温泉旅游的发展与研究述评[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2004(4)：30-34.
[31]王爱娥.湖南省温泉酒店投资环境评价研究[D].湖南：湖南师范大学,2009.
[32]刘继芬,王景甫,马重芳,等.中低温地热发电循环参数的优化[J].化工学报,2011(S1)：190-196.
[33]李云,张兵强.地热用于油田集输伴热及发电的经济性分析[J].煤气与热力,2009(1)：5-7.
[34]K HN M V B G.J.W. E A COCKERILL T T.Combined technical and economic evaluationof the Northern European offshore wind resource.[J].Journal of Wind Engineering andIndustrial Aerodynamics,2001.
[35]马立杰.DEA理论及应用研究[D].山东：山东大学,2007.
[36]YANG WAN-FA MA HWONG-WEN et al HUNG MING-LUNG.A novel multiobjective programming approach dealing with qualitative and quantitative objectives for environmental management[J].Ecological Economics,2006.
[37]LIU JUN ELHAG. T M S WANG YING-MING.An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008.
[38]CHENG H L. EDDIE W L.Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection[J].Building and Environment,2004.
[39]JYOTI K P MUDIT KULSHRESHTHA.Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in India:a DEA analysis.[J].Energy Economics,2002
[40]马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].科学出版社：北京,2010.
[41]田延山.中国地热资源及开发利用[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[42]张驰.地热的成本、环境影响和可持续性[J].中国科技信息,2004(8)：18-21.
[43]徐世光,郭远生.地热学基础[M].北京：科学出版社,2009.
[44]多吉,范小平.加强地热开发政策保障力度、确保地热开发可持续发展[C].中国地热能：成就与展望——李四光倡导中国地热能开发利用40周年纪念大会暨中国地热发展研讨会论文集.北京：地质出版社,2010.
[45]庄少勤.大力推广浅层地热开发利用、促进生态环境与经济建设协调发展[J].上海国土资源,2011(2)：16-17+39.
[46]祁进成.地热开发前景广阔[N].中国环境报.2013(3).
[47]郭丽华.我国地热资源开发中发展循环经济的思考[J].中国集体经济,2008(24)：30-31.
[48]郑斓.中国地热资源开发利用的经济意义[J].中小企业管理与科技(上旬刊),2008(11)：114.
[49]祖文超,戎卫国,左庭荣,等.地埋管地源热泵系统设计及其经济性分析[J].制冷空调与电力机械.2009.
[50]王春宏.湖南省新邵县大新金矿开发利用的经济评价研究[D].北京大学(北京),2009.
[51]陈玉华.基于DEA的煤层气经济评价模型研究[D].北京国矿业大学,2010.
[52]刁凤琴.石油储量动态经济评价研究[D].武汉国地质大学,2007.
[53]张培民.地源热泵系统的技术经济及环保效益综合评价[D].北京华大学,2011.
[54]朱家玲.地热能开发与应用技术.北京：化学工业出版社,2006.
[55]张国辉.地源热泵系统技术经济性评价研究[D].武汉：武汉理工大学,2012.
[56]庄运超.复合地源热泵系统的长期经济运行策略研究[D].湖南]：湖南工业大学,2012.
[57]王坤,赵娜,刘洋,等.地热资源循环利用和回灌技术示范研究[Z].2011.
[58]L.M.EDWARDS地热能源手册[M].北京：地质出版社,2000.
[59]齐学玲,齐金生,穆浩.天津津南农业科技园区地热利用工程[M].北京：地质出版社,2005.
[60]王树芳.地热能源在新农村建设中的应用——以河北省雄县为例[J].安徽农业科学,2012(30)：14895-14896+14936.
[61]林黎,孙宝成,赵苏民,等.地热资源开发利用的地质环境问题探讨[C].中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会2007年学术年会暨“生态环境脆弱区工程地质”学术论坛论文集.北京：科学出版社,2007.
[62]朱家玲,张凤山.地热供暖节能潜力与环境效益动态分析[J].太阳能学报,2000(3)：321-326.
[63]昝成,孟富春,董明.地热+高温水源热泵区域供暖工程环境影响分析[J].工程建设与设计,2006(7)：13-15.
[64]申建梅,陈宗宇,张古彬.地热开发利用过程中的环境效应及环境保护[J].地球报,1998(4)：67-73.
[65]林黎,孙宝成,赵苏民.天津地区地热流体开发利用中的环境质量问题[C].全国地热产业可持续发展学术研讨会论文集.北京：化学工业出版社,2005.
[66]胡先才，孙继东,姚中华,等.西藏地热活动与开发对地质环境的影响[J].山地学报，003(S 1)：45-48.
[67]孙艺伟.地热资源的利用及其面临的若干问题[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2010(10)：44-47.
[68]苏艳.关中盆地中部地压型地热流体环境同位素水文地球化学特征研究[D].西安：长安大学,2008.
[69]贺玉龙,杨立中,熊春梅.地热开发过程中的主要工程环境问题[J].环境与可持续发展,2008(5)：42-44.
[70]尤伟静,刘延锋,郭明晶.地热资源开发利用过程中的主要环境问题[J].安全与环境工程,2013(2)：24-28+34.
[71]张阿玲,李继峰.构建中国的能源-经济-环境系统评价模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007(9)：1537-1540.
[72]赵芳.基于3E协调的能源发展政策研究[D].北京：中国海洋大学,2008.
[73]王俊岭,赵瑞芬,王贤.能源-经济-环境(3E)系统和谐度评价研究——以河北省为例[J].经济与管理,2012,v.26；No.220(9)：94-97.
[74]郭小哲.能源经济环境系统综合模型研究[C]//北京航空航天大学出版社(Beihang University Press),2009.
[75]邓玲玲.能源—经济—环境(3E)系统协调度评价及其影响因素研究[D].湖南：湖南大学,2012.
[76]Marie-Laure BOUGNOL,Jose H. DULa. Validating Dea as a Ranking Tool:an Application of Dea to Assess Performance in Higher Education[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2006(1).
[77]Ben Soltane BASSEM.Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions in the Mediterranean:an Application of Dea[J]. Transformation research review,2008(2).
[78]Thomas R. SEXTON,Herbert F. LEWIS.Two-stage Dea:an Application to Major League Baseball[J]. Journal of productivity analysis,2003(2).
[79]刘璟,王涛,王国贞.基于DEA的河北省能源-经济-环境协调评价研究[J].商场现代化,2010,No.619(22)：97.
[80]Valter BOLJUNcIc.Sensitivity Analysis of an Efficient Dmu in Dea Model with Variable Returns to Scale (vrs)[J]. Journal of productivity analysis,2006(1):.
[81]王红岩.公共项目经济评价体系研究[D].辽宁：东北财经大学,2007.
[82]王燕妮.经济附加值(EVA)的理论方法与企业应用研究[D].西安：西北农林科技大学,2003.
[83]魏权龄.评价相对有效性的数据包络分析模DEA和网络DEA[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[84]高俊强.投资项目经济评价指标分析[J].南宁职业技术学院学报,2008(3)：65-68.
[85]吴祖源.关于建设项目经济评价指标的几个问题[J].煤炭经济研究,1998(7)：48-50.
[86]孙雷.主成分分析法和模糊综合分析法在水质评价中的实例比较[J].环境科学与管理,2011(8)：178-181.
[87]李松,邸彦彪,贺婧.主成分分析法用于可持续发展综合评价的探讨[J].辽宁工学院学报(社会科学版),2005(5)：21=23.
[88]黄庭.基于多目标优化的矿产资源经济评价模型及其实证研究[D].武汉：中国地质大学,2010.
[89]许淑娜,李长坡.对主成分分析法三个问题的剖析[J].数学理论与应用,2011(4)：116-121.
[90]Anon.Dea Model-Extensions [J].Service Productivity Management,2006(10):45-49.
[91]Marie-Laure BOUGNOL, Jose H. DULa. Validating Dea as a Ranking Tool:an Application of Dea to Assess Performance in Higher Education [J]. Research on Chronicle Operation, 2006(1):66-69.
[92]Gary D. FERRIER, Michael D. ROSKO,Vivian G. VALDMANIS.Analysis of Uncompensated Hospital Care Using a Dea Model of Output Congestion[J]. Health Care Management Science, 2006(2):34-38.
[93]W. W. COOPER,R. G. THOMPSON,R. M. THRALL.Chapter 1 Introduction:Extensions and New Developments in Dea[J]. Research on Chronicle Operation,1996(1):56-60.
[94]Lucinda DIRVEN.The Author of De Dea Syria and His Cultural Heritage[J]. Patron Saint, 1997(2)32-37.
[95]Jiaoping YANG, Hongxia ZHAO.Fuzzy Super-efficiency Dea Model and Its Application: Based on Fuzzy Structured Element [J].Fuzzy Information and Engineering 2010, 2010(7):71-75.
[96]Jan LARSSON, Kjetil TELLE.Consequences of the Ippc's Bat Requirements for Emissions and Abatement Costs:a Dea Analysis on Norwegian Data [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008(4):36-40.
[97]Erik BIORN,Terje P. HAGEN,Tor IVERSEN, et al.The Effect of Activity-based Financing on Hospital Efficiency:a Panel Data Analysis of Dea Efficiency Scores 1992-2000[J]. Health Care Management Science,2003(4):111-119.
[98]Lukas STEINMANN, Peter ZWEIFEL.The Range Adjusted Measure (ram) in Dea:Comment [J]. Productivity Analysis,2001(2):121-128.
[99]Anon.Dea Concepts for Managers [J].Service Productivity Management,2006(10):79-88.
[100]Shao-Jen WENG, Teresa WU, Jennifer BLACKHURST, et al.An Extended Dea Model for Hospital Performance Evaluation and Improvement [J]. Public Medical and Health Services, 2008(1):66-72.
[101]L. N. GVAZAVA.Dea Cetyllanatoside a From the Leaves of Digitalis Ciliata [J] Chemistry of Natural Compounds,1977(2):101-108.
[102]M. KAFFARNIK,H. MAUCH,A. ROTH.Quantification Ofmycobacterium Tuberculosis Dna Using Pcr and a Simple Dot Blot-based Dna Enzyme Assay (dea)[J].Experientia,1996(4):96-103.
[103]Gao CHONG, Zhang JIAN-ZE, Li XIAO-DONG.Technical Efficiency Analysis of New Energy Listed Companies Based on Dea [J].Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, 2010(12):45-51.
[104]Karl-Heinz LEITNER, Julia PRIKOSZOVITS, Michaela SCHAFFHAUSER-LINZATTI, et al.The Impact of Size and Specialisation on Universities' Department Performance:a Dea Analysis Applied to Austrian Universities [J]. Higher Education,2007(4):39-46.
[105]Joe ZHU.Non-radial Dea Models and Dea with Preference [J].Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking,2009(9):131-140.
[106]袁以美,叶合欣.MATLAB在经济评价中的应用[J].水利科技与经济,2004(3)：142-144.
[107]熊焰,余石.Matlab在经济系统参数确定中的应用[J].中南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2003(2)：97-99.
[108]王书文，乐永生MATLAB在确定管道造价公式经济参数中的应用[J].山西建筑2010(29)：250-251.
[109]刘勇,白林.基于MATLAB的回归分析模型在经济预测分析中的应用[J].中国管理信息化,2008(5)：69-71.
[110]陶孟章,徐倜凡.使用Matlab/GUI功能设计动力性经济型计算软件[J].中国科技信息,2008(13)：97-99.
[111]王焱.在MATLAB环境下经济预测神经网络模型的建立[J].辽宁经济管理干部学院学报,2000(1)：33-35.
[112]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会地热开发与管理：福建省连江县.中国温泉之乡专辑，2009(31).
[113]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：天津市东丽.中国温泉之乡专辑,2009(34).
[114]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：贵州省石迁县.中国温泉之乡专辑,2010(36).
[115]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会地热开发与管理：安徽省巢湖市.中国温泉之乡专辑,2010(37).
[116]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理：北京金隅凤山温泉.中国5A级温泉度假村专辑,2011(42).
[117]中国矿业联合会地热专业委员会.地热开发与管理,2011(44).
[118]Richard W.Asplund清洁能源投资[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2009.
[119]张陆洋.风险投资导论[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,2007.
[120]张延军等.基于岩土工程的地源热泵研究热点及回顾.地温资源与地源热泵技术应用论文集[M].北京：地质出版社.
[121]刘时斌主编.地热资源及其开发利用和保护[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2005.
[122]毛战坡,王雨春,王世岩等.环境影响评价与管理实务大全[M].中国水利水电出版社.2008.
[123]沈洪艳,崔建升.环境影响评价实用技术与方法[M].中国石化出社,2011.
[124]国家发展改革委建设部.建设项目经济评价方法与参数(第三版)[M].中国计划出版社, 2006.
[125]刘颖春,刘立群.技术经济学[M].化学工业出版社,2010.
[126]张先治,陈友邦.财务分析[M].东北财经大学出版社,2010.
[127]蔡义汉.地热直接利用[M].天津大学出版社,2004.
[128]王贵玲,蔺文静.浅层地热资源的基本内涵与资源勘查评价的基本理念[C].浅层地温(热)能资源特性及评价方法对地源热泵工程的研讨会论文集.2008.
[129]宾德智.对我国地热资源开发利用的几点建议[C].中国地热能：成就与展望----李四光倡导中国地热能开发利用40周年纪念大会暨中国地热研讨会论文集.2010.
[130]骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中集中标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004(9)：51-60.
[131]臧海洋.沈阳城区地下水源热泵适宜性评价及应用模式研究[D].沈阳建筑大学.2011.
[132]刘晓峰,陈通.多属性决策视角下的投资项目经济评价[J].统计与决策,2010(19)：70-73.
[133]徐金泉.《建设项目经济评价方法与参数》第三版解读[J].中国工程咨询,2006(10)：8-11.
[134]罗萍.油气开发项目经济评价方法与参数修订的几点建议[J].内蒙古石油化工,2009(2)：34-35.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |