用户名: 密码: 验证码:
盐岩地下储气库风险评估与调控方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
石油和天然气战略储备是国家保障能源安全稳定供应的重要手段之一,越来越受到世界各国的高度重视。盐岩地下储气库利用盐岩低渗透率、良好的蠕变行为和损伤自我恢复能力,实现能源战略储备安全、可靠、经济以及节省土地、保护环境的目的。国外盐岩地下储气库破坏、气体泄漏和地表沉降等事故时有发生,对环境和能源安全储备带来灾难性后果。我国盐岩地下储气库项目建设刚刚起步,而且与国外在巨厚盐丘中修建储气库相比,盐岩层具有埋藏浅、盐层薄、夹层多、品位低的特点,进一步加大了项目建设和运营风险。因此,在我国开展盐岩地下储气库风险评估与调控方法研究,是确保实现油气能源安全储备的迫切要求。
     本文主要研究内容和创新成果如下:
     (1)建立盐岩地下储气库风险分级全息模型,提出职责化情景过滤和定性严重性分级过滤方法。风险分级全息模型从项目管理、环境、技术、围岩介质、库体、控制和功能等7个视角展示储气库全寿命期主要风险源;经职责化情景过滤和定性严重性分级过滤,确定设计方、施工方和运营方需重点关注的高风险源。
     (2)建立盐岩地下储气库体积收敛失效概率分析一次二阶矩法显示功能函数,得出储气库体积收敛失效概率随内压和时间的变化规律。在长期恒定内压工况下体积收敛失效概率随内压的增大而减小,且相同失效概率下内压值随时间的延长而增大;在短期调峰低压运行工况下,体积收敛失效概率随内压的减小而增大,储气库最小运行内压应大于4.2Mpa。
     (3)通过模型试验得出储气库体积收敛变形随内压和注、采气速率的变化规律。储气库体积收敛随内压的增大而减小,最低运行内压应大于4.0MPa;体积收敛变形在高压运行时呈加速变化趋势,最高运行压力应小于22.0MPa;体积收敛受注、采气速率变化影响显著,应控制注气速率小于0.75Mpa/d,采气速率小于0.65Mpa/d。
     (4)在盐岩地下储气库风险因子影响模糊综合评价基础上,建立“储气库破坏”、“储气库泄漏”和“储气库地表沉降”三大事故风险评价层次分析模型,确定风险因子影响权重分布和风险水平。
     (5)建立盐岩地下储气库风险管理程序,提出设计方案优化、施工动态控制和运行工况优化的风险调控方法。确定层状盐岩地下储气库椭球形腔体及关键设计参数优化方案;根据三大事故失效概率分析结果,确定储气库在不同运行工况下压力(压差)、时间和注、采气速率安全取值范围。
     (6)建立基于信息化技术的盐岩地下储气库项目风险管理和评价系统。完成系统数据流、工作流和封装与发布设计;将项目信息库、风险管理计划、风险辨识与过滤、风险评估、风险监控和风险应急救援等功能模块进行有机集成,实现数据的储存、调用和分析处理,为提高项目风险管理信息化水平奠定基础。
Energy strategic reserve of oil and gas is one of the most important means to ensure security and stability energy supply. It will be paid more and more attention by countries all over the world. The salt rock has the properties of low permeability, creep behavior, damage self-healing ability and other good characteristics. These properties has been used in salt rock underground gas storage to achieve the aims of safe, reliable, economic, saving land and protecting environment for energy strategic reserve. Some accidents happen frequently in foreign countries, such as destruction of gas storage, gas leakage and surface subsidence, etc. It has brought disastrous consequences to environment and energy reserve safety. Salt rock gas storage construction has just started in China. And the salt rock has the properties of shallower burial depth, lower thickness, multiple interlayer and lower grade compared with gas storage built in very thick salt rock in foreign countries. It will further increase project construction and operation risk. Therefore, study on risk assessment and regulation method of salt rock underground gas storage should be carried out in China to realize safe energy reserve of oil and gas.
     The research results of this paper lie in the following areas:
     (1) Risk holographic modeling of salt rock underground gas storage has been established and a method of responsibility scene filtration and qualitative severity classification filtration has been also proposed. Main risk sources during whole life cycle of gas storage have been displayed based on risk holographic modeling from seven aspects, project management, environment, technique, rock-mass mediums, gas storage entirety, controlling and function. By responsibility scene filtration and qualitative severity classification filtration, high and higher risk items should be mainly concerned by design, construction and operation organization have been determined.
     (2) First-order second-moment shown performance function used to analyze volume convergence failure probability of salt rock underground gas storage has been established and change law of volume convergence failure probability with internal pressure of gas storage and time could be obtained. Volume convergence failure probability decreases while internal pressure increases under the condition of long-term constant internal pressure of gas storage. And internal pressure value increases with time under the condition of same failure probability. Volume convergence failure probability increases while internal pressure decreases under the operation condition of low pressure gas recovery and the minimum internal pressure of gas storage should be kept above4.2MPa.
     (3) It could be obtained that volume convergence deformation of gas storage decreases while internal pressure increases and the minimum internal pressure should be kept above4.0MPa by model test. While volume convergence deformation showed a tendency of accelerated deformation under operation condition of high pressure and the maximum operation pressure should be less than22.0MPa. Changes of gas injection and gas recovery rate have a significant effect on volume convergence deformation. Gas injection rate should be controlled less than0.75MPa/d while gas recovery rate should be controlled less than0.65MPa/d.
     (4) Besad on the conclusion of Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the risk factors, Established the model of Risk assessment analytical hierarchy process of three accidents. Determined the weights distribution effected of different risk factors and obtained the level of three accidents.
     (5) Risk management program of salt rock underground gas storage has been established and risk regulation method, such as optimization of design scheme, dynamic control of construction and optimization of operation condition has been proposed. Optimization scheme of ellipsoidal cavity and key design parameters of layered salt rock gas storage has been determined. According to analysis results of three accidents failure probability, safe value range of pressure of operation condition, time, gas injection and gas recovery rate has also been determined.
     (6) System of project risk management and evaluation of salt rock underground gas storage has been established based on information technology and data stream, work flow, design of encapsulation and publishing of system have been completed. Six function modules, including project information database, risk management plan, risk identification and filtration, risk assessment, risk monitoring and risk emergency rescue, have been organically integrated to achieve the aims of storage, calling, analysis and processing of data. It will lay a foundation for improving project risk management level.
引文
[1]李洪欣,宁永胜.我国的能源形势与和平发展战略[J].改革与发展,2009,7(29):43-46.
    [2]李建中.利用岩盐层建设盐穴地下储气库[J].天然气工业,2004,9(4):119-121.
    [3]Wen Ran, Reuters. China vehicles form a line for natural gas on a spiral bridge in Chong Qing[J]. National Geographic,2010,5(1):10-11.
    [4]谭羽非,廉乐明.国外地下储气库的技术与发展[J].油气储运,1997,16(12):17-19.
    [5]孙岩冰.气荒会否重演[J].中国石油石化,2010,22:18-21.
    [6]丁国生,谢萍.中国地下储气库现状与发展展望[J].天然气工业,2006,26(6):111-113.
    [7]Thomas R. L, Gehle R. M. A brief history of salt cavern use[C]. The 8th World Salt Symposium, Volume 1. Elsevier,2000,207-214.
    [8]P. Berest, and B. Brouard. Safety of Salt Caverns Used for Underground Storage [J]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Rev. IFP,2003,58(3):361-384.
    [9]David Tomasko, Deborah Elcock, John Veil, et al. Risk analyses for disposing nonhazardous oil field waste in salt caverns[R]. Argonne:Argonne National Laboratory,1997.
    [10]宋桂华,李国韬,温庆河,等.世界盐穴应用历史回顾与展望[J].天然气工业,2004,24(9):116-118.
    [11]S.Sakurai. Time-dependent behavior of circular cylindrical cavity in continu ous medium of brittle aggregate [D]. East Lansing:Michigan state University,1966.
    [12]S.Serata. Development of design principle for disposal of reactor fuel waste into underground salt cavities [D]. Austin:University of Texas,1959.
    [13]S.Serata and O. Abu-Gheida. Principles of stress fields in underground formations for NSF progress report No.4[R]. East Lansing:Michigan state university,1964.
    [14]S.Serata, S. Sakurai, and T. Adachi. Theory of aggregate rock behavior based on absolute three-dimensional testing of rock salt[C]. Proceedings of the 10th symposium on rock mechanics. Sustin:University of texas,1968.
    [15]S.Serata. Rock mehanics problems of solution cavities used for storage of gaseous and solid matters[C]. Proc.1973 AIME Annual meeting. Illinois,1974.
    [16]S.Serata. Stress control Technique alternative to roof boliting[J]. Mining Engineering,1976, 22(5):335-338.
    [17]S.Serata. Geomechanical basis for design of underground salt cavities[C]. Energy technology conference, Houston:ASME,1978.
    [18]Adachi, T. Construction of continuum theories and their application to underground detection of stress conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California,1970.
    [19]P. R.Dawson. Constitutive Models applied in the analysis of creep of rock salt[R]. Albuquerque:Sandia Laboratories,1979.
    [20]M. G. Dwyer, R.L.Thoms, Finite element analysis of salt domes with stored hot wastes[C], Proc.4th Int, Symp. On salt, Ohio:Geological Soc.1973.
    [21]杨春和,曾义军,吴文,等.深层盐岩本构关系及其在石油钻井工程中的应用研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,,2003,32(5):1678-1682.
    [22]梁卫国,赵阳升,徐素国,等.盐岩矿床内油气储备和核废料处置[J].太原理工大学学报,2005,36(4):440-443.
    [23]杨春和,白世伟.应力水平及加载路径对盐岩失效的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,19(3):270-275.
    [24]陈锋.李银平,杨春和,等.云应盐矿盐岩蠕变特性试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报.2006,25:3022-3028.
    [25]吴文,侯正猛,杨春和,等.盐岩的渗透性特性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(7):73-76.
    [26]高小平,杨春和,吴文,等.盐岩蠕变特性温度效应的实验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,24(12):2054-2059.
    [27]吴文,徐松林,杨春和,等.盐岩冲击过程本构关系和状态方程研究[J].岩土工程学报,2004,26(3):367-372.
    [28]杨春和,陈锋,曾义金.盐岩蠕变本构关系研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(11):1602-1604.
    [29]韦立德,杨春和,徐卫亚.基于细观力学的盐岩蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J].岩石力学与程学报,2005,24(23):4253-4258.
    [30]陈锋,杨春和,白世伟.盐岩储气库蠕变损伤分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(6):945-949.
    [31]高小平,杨春和,吴文.盐岩失效特性实验研究[J].岩土力学,2005,27(5):558-561.
    [32]许德全.岩盐地下储气库地质介质的应变及其控制[J].油气储运,2003.22(3):59-61.
    [33]尹雪英.金坛盐矿老腔储气库长期稳定性分析数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2006.27(6):869-874.
    [34]郤保平.含高盐份泥岩夹层的盐岩蠕变特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2007.3(1):23-26.
    [35]张强勇,刘德军,贾超,等.盐岩油气储库介质地质力学模型相似材料的研制[J].岩土力学,2009,30(12):3581-3586.
    [36]刘德军,向文,张强勇,等.具有流变特性的盐岩相似材料的研制及应用[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(10):1590-1595.
    [37]肖学兰.地下储气库建设技术研究现状及建议[J].集输工程,2012.2.32(2):79-82.
    [38]赵克烈.注采气过程地下盐岩储气库可行性研究[J].武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2009.
    [39]DIAMOND H W.The water-brine interface method.an alternative mechanical integrity test for salt solution mining wells[C]//SMRI Fall Meeting San Antonio:SMRI.1989.
    [40]李银平,杨春和,施锡林.盐穴储气库造腔控制与安全评估[J].北京:科学出版社,2012.
    [41]将向阳.顶板垮塌在水溶采矿中的应用[J].化工矿物与加工,1994,23(4):10-12.
    [42]魏东吼.金坛盐穴地下储气库造腔工程技术研究[D].北京:中国石油大学,2008.
    [43]Kumar, Niraj, Paul, Biswajit. Planning of risk assessment and safety management in Indian surface mines.
    [44]Saaty, Thomas L. Risk, its priority and probability:the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Risk Analysis,1987,7(2):159-172.
    [45]Staudtmeister K, Rokahr R. B. Rock mechanical design of storage caverns for natural gas in rock salt mass.
    [46]黄宏伟.隧道及地下工程建设中的风险管理研究进展[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(1):13-20.
    [47]李惠强,涂晓敏.建设工程事故风险路径、风险源分析与风险概率估算[J].工程力学,2001,A03:716-16719.
    [48]李惠强,苏桂武,等.自然灾害风险的行为主体特性与时间尺度问题[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):9-16.
    [49]李黎武,施周.基于模糊事件概率理论的水质风险率计算方法[J].水利学报,2007,38(4):417-421.
    [50]P. Berest, and B. Brouard. Safety of Salt Caverns Used for Underground Storage [J]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Rev. IFP,2003,58(3):361-384.
    [51]Thoms R L, Gehle R M,1988. Survey of existing caverns in U.S.salt domes//Proceeding of 2th Conference Mech. Beh. Clausthal-Zellerfeld:Trans.Tech.Publ.:703-717.
    [52]B. Ehgartner, J. Neal, and T. Hinkebein. Gas releases from salt[C]. SMRI Spr. Mtg:1998,5: 68.
    [53]杨春和,梁卫国,魏东吼,等.中国盐岩能源地下储存可行性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(1):4409-4417.
    [54]吴文,杨春和,侯正猛.盐岩中能源(石油和天然气)地下储存力学问题研究现状及其进展[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(增2):5561-5568.
    [55]李媛,张强勇,贾超,等.盐岩地下油气储库运营期风险的故障树分析[J].岩土力学,2011,4:1125-1130.
    [56]刘忠伟.地下储气库方案的模糊综合优选[J].油气储运,2006.25(5):16-19.
    [57]魏东吼,屈丹安,等.盐穴型地下储气库建设与声纳测量技术[J].油气储运,2007.26(8): 58-60.
    [58]李世熙,于洪亮.浅谈金坛地下储气库数字化建设[J].油气田地面工程,2008.27(9):73.
    [59]张强勇,陈旭光,张宁.交变气压风险条件下层状盐岩地下储气库注采气大型三维地质力学试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010.29:2410-2419.
    [60]贾超,张强勇,张宁,等.盐岩地下储气库风险分级机制初探[J].岩土力学,2009,30(12):3621-3626.
    [61]钱七虎.中国地下[程安全风险管理的现状、问题及相关建议[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008.27:649-655.
    [62]EVANS D J. An appraisal of underground gas storage technologies and incidents for the development of assessment methodology[R]. Nottingham, UK; British Geological Survey,2007.
    [63]杨琴,余清修,银小兵,等.枯竭气藏型地下储气库工程安全风险与预防控制措施探讨[J].石油与天然气化工,2011,40(4):410-412.
    [64]李丽锋,罗金恒,赵新伟,等.盐穴地下储气库风险评估技术与控制措施[J].油气储运,2010.29(9):648-651.
    [65]M. L.JEREMIC. ROCK MECHANINSALT MINING A.A.BALKEMA/ROTTERDAM/ BROOKFIELD//1994.
    [66]Avdagi, M.1988. Basic information of salt carvern solution in salt deposits.Min.& Metall. Journal (Belgrade),39(4):1-7(in Yugoslav).
    [67]Yuanxiang, L.& N. Chengxun 1983. Technical developmemt of solution mining in thinly bedded rock salt deposits of Ziliujing, Szechuan, China. In Proc.of 6th Int.Symp.on salt,The Salt Institute,Virginnia,Vol.2,pp.87-90.
    [68]Gustin, J. D.1983. Energy storage in salt. In Proc. of 6th Int. Symp.on salt, The Salt Institute, Virginnia, Vol.2, pp.177-182.
    [69]P. Berst, D. N. Minh. Stability of cavities in rock salt. In Proc.of Int. Symp. on Weak Rock,21-24 September,1981,Tokyo, pp.473-478.
    [70]Hunsche U.1996. Determination of the dilatancy boundary and damage up to failure for four typres of rock salt at different stress geometries [C]//The 4th Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of salt. Clausthal-Zellerfeld:Trans. Tech. Publications.
    [71]杨春和,李银平,陈锋.层状盐岩力学理论与工程[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
    [72]B. Ehgartner, J. Neal, and T. Hinkebein. Gas releases from salt[C]. SMRI Spr. Mtg:1998,5: 68.
    [73]王玉梅,郭书平.国外天然气管道事故分析[J].油气储运,2000,19(7).
    [74]M. Lee Allison. A Geologic Detective Story [J]. Geotimes,2001,10:102-107.
    [75]W. Dreyer. Results of Recent Studies on the Stability of Crude Oil and Gas Storage in Salt Caverns[C], Fourth Symp on Salt. Ohio:Geol Soc.,1974:65.
    [76]G. Coates, C. Lee, W. McClain, et al. Closure and collapse of cavities in salt[C],Sixth Symp on Salt, Ibid,1978:139.
    [77]Mitchell B. Use of the most likely failure point method for risk estimation and risk uncertainty analysis [J]. Journal of hazardous materials, A91 (2002):1-24.
    [78]Rosenbloom J S. A Case study in Risk Management.Prentice Hall.1972.
    [79]William C A, Henie R M.Risk Management and Insurance.New York:McGraw-Hill.1985.
    [80]Mohammad Modarres. Risk analysis in engineering techniques, tools and trends [M]. Boca Raton:Taylor & Francis,2006.
    [81]宋明哲.风险管理[M].台北:中华企业管理发展中心,1984.
    [82]罗吉.弗兰根[英].工程建设风险管理(李世蓉)[M].中国建工出版社,2001.
    [83]王卓甫.工程项目风险管理—理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
    [84]刘金兰.油气资源勘探项目风险分析[J].天津大学学报,1997,30(5):540-547.
    [85]Y.Y. Haimes, S. Kaplan, and J. H. Lambert, Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling [J]. Risk Analysis,2001(22):381-395.
    [86]Hames Y Y. Hierarchical holographic modeling [J]. I EEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybemetics,1981(9):606-617.
    [87]Hames Y Y, Lambert J,Li Duan, et al Hierarchical holographic modeling for risk identification in complex systems [J]//Proceeding of the IEEE Intermational Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Piscataway, NJ:IEEE.1995,2:1027-1032.
    [88]Baron, J., J. C. Hershey and H. Kunreuther,2000, Determinants of priority for risk reduction:the roie of worry, Risk Analysis 20(4).413-427.
    [89]Haimes. Y. Y.,1991, Total risk management, Risk Analysis 11(2).169-171.
    [90]Haimes. Y. Y., N. C. Matalas, J. H., Lambert, B. A., Jackson, and J. F. R. Fellows,1997, Reducing the vulnerability of water supply system to attack. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 4(4).164-177.
    [91]Haimes. Y. Y., S. Kaplan, and J. H. Lambert,2002, Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling, Risk Analysis 22(2).383-397.
    [92]Dombroski, M.,2001. A risk-based decision support methodology for operations other than war, M. S. thesis, Department of system and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
    [93]马丽义,邱菀华,等.大型复杂项目风险建模与熵决策[M].北京航空航天大学学报2010,36(2):184-187.
    [94]Paul R, Garvey P Y, Lansdowne Z F, Risk matrix:An Approach for Identifying, Assessing,and Ranking Program risks[J]. Air Force Journal of Logistics,1998(25):16-19.
    [95]Lansdowne Z F, Risk matrix:An Approach for Prioritizing risks and Tracking Risk Mitigation Progress [A], Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute 1999 Seminars & Symposium[C]. Philadelphia, USA,1999.
    [96]朱启超,匡兴华.风险矩阵方法与应用述评[J].中国工程科学,2003,5(1):89-94.
    [97]Leroy J.Lsidore and W. Edward Back. Multiple Simulation Analysis for Probabilistic Cost and Schedule Integration, Journal of construction engineering and management [J].2002 (3):211-219.
    [98]Hurly W. J. On the Use of Martingales in Monte Carlo approaches to Multiperiod Parameter Uncertainty in Capital Investment risk analysi [J]. The Engineering Economist.1998,43(2): 169-182.
    [99]Sartori D.E. A Metamodel Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Capital Project Valuation [J]. The Engineering Economist,1997,43(1):1-24.
    [100]Sangyoub lee, Predictive Tool for Estimating Accident Risk[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2003(4):431-436.
    [101]Karia Knight, Aminah Robinson. Use of Fuzzy Logic for Predicting Design Cost Overruns on Building Projects [J]. Journal of construction engineering and management,2002(4)503-512.
    [102]Wang, C.W.and Huang, Y.C. A New Approach to Calculating Project Cost Variance [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2000,18:131-138.
    [103]Mohamed Attalla, Tarek Hegazy. Predicting Cost Deviation in Reconstruction Projects: Artificial Networks Versus Regression,Journal of construction engineering and management [J].2003(4):405-411.
    [104]王学军,范如国.一种工程项目风险分析方法的探讨[J].技术经济,2000(6):61-63.
    [105]于立勇.马尔可夫状态转移模型在逾期贷款中的应用[J].统计与决策,2000(4):25-26.
    [106]Chapman C B. A Risk Engineering Approach to Project Risk Management [J]. Project Management,1990,18(1).
    [107]Clark G. T., Borst A. Addressingriskin Seattle-underground [J]. PB Network,2002, (1):34-3.
    [108]赵铁锤.危险化学品安全评价[M].北京,中国石化出版社,2003.
    [109]赵国藩.工程结构可靠度[M].北京:水利出版社,1986.
    [110]贡金鑫.工程结构可靠度计算方法[M].大连:大连理工大!学出版社,2003.
    [111]Shinozuka M. Basic analysis of structural safety. Journal of Structural Division, 1983.109(3):721-740.
    [112]Melchers R E. Structural reliability analysis and prediction (Second edition). New York:John Wiley & Sons.1999.
    [113]陈锋,杨春和,白世伟.盐岩储气库最佳采气速率数值模拟研究[J].岩土力学,2007, 28(1):57-61.
    [114]周扬.长大隧道工程建设期风险接受准则研究[D].上海:同济大学,2009.
    [115]吴文,侯整猛,杨春和,等.盐岩中能源(石油和天然气)地下储存库稳定性评价标准研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(14):2498-2505.
    [116]李银平,杨春和,施锡林.盐穴储气库造腔控制与安全评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
    [117]Ewy R T, Cook N G W.1990b. Deformation and fracture around cylindrical openings in rock-Ⅰ. Observations and analysis of deformations [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts,27(5):409-427.
    [118]Evangelista A, Feola A, et al.2000. Numerical analysis of roof failure mechanisms of cavities in a roof rock[C]//Proceeding of the International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Melbourne.
    [119]Ewy R T, Cook N G W.1990a. Deformation and fracture around cylindrical openings in rock-. Observations and analysis of deformations [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts,27(5):387-407.
    [120]Lee, M. Y, B. L. Ehgarter, B. Y. Park, and D. R. Bronowski,2004. Laboratory Evaluation of Damage Criteria and Permeability of Big Hill Salt, SAND 2004-6004, SandiaNational Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
    [121]Hou Z, Lux K H.1999. Some new developments in the design of pillar in salt mining [J]. //Proceedings of 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris.
    [122]Preece D S.1994. Structural Stability of the Weeks Island Oil Repository [J]. Albuquerque:Sandia National Laboratories.
    [123]Rokahr R, Staudtmeister K. The assessment of the stability of a cavern field in bedded salt with the help of the new Hannover dimensioning concept [J]. In:Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on theMechanicalBehavior of Salt[c]. Palaiseau, France:[s.n],1993.533-544.
    [124]Pieer Berest. SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PREESALL SALTFIELD GAS STORAGE PROJECT.11/2/2009.
    [125]黄宏伟,陈龙,胡群芳,等.隧道及地下工程的全寿命风险管理[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [126]中国土木工程学会.地铁及地下工程建设风险管理指南.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
    [127]Yokel, F. Y. et al. Housing construction in areas of mine subsidence. J. Geotechn. Engng. Div.(Proc. of Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.),109,GT9,September 1982:1133-1149.
    [128]Chapman C B, Cooper D F. Risk Analysis for Large Project:Model, Methods and Case. New York:John Wiley.1987.
    [129]Cooper. D, Chapman. C. Risk Analysis for Large Projects:Models, Methods and Cases [M]. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.2002,303-313.
    [130]Desseautlt M B, Bruno M S, Barrera J.2001. Casing shear causes, cases, cures[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers,98-107.
    [131]田芳.模糊综合评判法在风险分析中的应用[J].系统工程与电子技术,2003,25(2):174-176.
    [132]肖辞源.工程模糊系统[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,,2004.
    [133]肖龙,戴宗坤.信息系统风险的多级模糊综合评判模型[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2004,36(3):98-102.
    [134]狄建华.模糊数学理论在建筑安全综合评价中的应用[J].华南理工大学学报自然科版,2002,33(7):87-91.
    []35]许传华,任青文.地下工程围岩稳定性的模糊综合评判法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(11):1852-1855.
    [136]卢有杰.卢家仪,项目风险管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998.
    [137]王卓甫.工程项目风险管理-理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
    [138]钟登华,张建设,等.基于AHP的工程项目风险分析方法[J].天津人学学报,2002(3):163-168.
    [139]Sangyoub lee, Predictive Tool for Estimating Accident Risk[J], Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2003(4):431-436.
    [140]Karia Knight, Aminah Robinson. Use of Fuzzy Logic for Predicting Design Cost Overruns on Building Projects [J]. Journal of construction engineering and management,2002(4): 503-512.
    [141]Barry C. Ezell, John V. Farr. Infrastructure Risk Analysis Model [J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems,2000,6(3):114-117.
    [142]Prasanta Kumar Dey, Analytic Hierarchy Process Analyzes Risk of Operating Cross-Country Petroleum Pipelines in Indian [J]. Natural Hazards Review,2003(10): 213-221.
    [1431 Lewis, H.1992, Technological Risk, W. W. Norton, New York.
    [144]Haimes Y. Y., Hierarch Holographic Modeling [J]. IEEE Transaction on system, Man and Cybernetics,1981(9):606-617.
    [145]Haimes, Y.Y., Total risk management [J]. Risk Analysis 1991,11 (2),169-171.
    [146]Suresh, K. R., Mujumdar, P. P. A fuzzy risk approach for performance evaluation of an irrigation reservoir system [J]. Agricultural Water Management,2004,69(3):159-177.
    [147]Kaplan,S., Y. Y. Haimes,and B. J. Garrick,2001,Fitting hierarchical holographic modeling into the theory of scenario structuring and a refinement to the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 21(5):807-819.
    [148]何威.基于AHP层次分析法和模糊比较矩阵的绩效评估法[J].应用技术,2007,(11):77-78.
    [149]陈桥,胡克.正态分布函数在层次分析法判断矩阵建立中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34:67-81.
    [150]张吉军.模糊层次分析法(FAHP)[J].模糊系统与数学,2000,14(2):80-88.
    [151]Simister S J. Usage and Benefits of Project Risk Analysis and Management. Int. Journal of Project Management.1994,12(1):5-8.
    [152]邱菀华.现代项目风险管理方法与实践[M].北京:科学山版社,2003,7.
    [153]祁世芳,贾月阳.工程项目的风险管理研究[J].北京:太原理工大学学报,2002,23(1):95-99.
    [154]王振强.大型水电工工程风险分析理论与应用研究[D].天津:天津大学出版社,2003,11.
    [155]张亚莉,杨乃定,杨朝君.项目全寿命周期风险管理的研究[J].科学管理研究,2004,(2):27-30.
    [156]美国项目管理协会,项目管理知识体系(PMBOK)2000版[M].北京:北京现代卓越管理技术交流中心,2001.
    [157]中国项目管理研究委员会,中国项目管理知识体系与国际项目管理专业资质认证标准[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
    [158]克里斯.查普曼,斯蒂芬.沃德.项目风险管理,过程,技术和洞察力[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2003,5.
    [159]中国项目管理国际研讨会学术委员会.中国项目管理知识体系纲要[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002.
    [160]陈伟珂.工程项目风险管理[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007,6.
    [161]白云,汤竞,毛建民.试论地下工程风险管理中参建各方的地位与作用[M].土木工程学报,2009,42(1):124-129.
    [162]何旭东.基于利益相关者理论工程项目主体行为风险管理研究[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(17),194.
    [163]吴宏建,刘宽亮.城市轨道交通工程建设风险与保险[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012,1.
    [164]国家安全生产监督管理总局.安全评价[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005.
    [165]王卓甫.风险及其对策[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005,10.
    [166]国汉军.风险预控基本理论及在煤矿实践中的应用[J].中国煤炭,2007,33(H):65-68,72.
    [167]李新春,宋学锋.基于风险预控的煤矿安全管理评价系统建立研究[J].煤炭工 程,2007,(9):82-84.
    [168]黄宏伟,朱琳,等.上海地铁11号线关键节点工可阶段工程风险评估[J].岩士工程学报,2007,29(7):1103-1107.
    [169]蒋向阳.顶板垮塌在水溶采矿中的应用[J].化工矿物与加工,1994,23(4):10-12.
    [170]张安元.煤矿井下重大危险源辨识与监控方法研究[D].山东科技大学,2004.
    [171]林柏泉,康国峰,周延,王文超.煤矿生产安全风险管理机制的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(5):43-50.
    [172]王要武,孙成双.建设项目风险分析专家系统框架研究[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,2002,35(5):96-99.
    [173]吴立云,杨玉中.综采工作面人一机一环境系统安全性分析[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2008,16(3):436-445.
    [174]Sobolik S R, Ehgartner B L. Analysis of Salt and Casing Fracture Mechanisms During Carvern Integrity Testing for SPR Salt Caverns[R]. SAND2006-1974, Sandia National Laboratories.
    [175]王保群,张强勇,李术才,杨春和,等.盐岩地下油气储库设计参数优化研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报.2011,30(增1):619-624.
    [176]Steven R. Sobolik and Brian L., Ehgartner. Analysis of Cavern Shapes for the Strategic Petrolenum Reserve [R]. SAND 2006-1974, Sandia National Laboratories.
    [177]施锡林,李银平,杨春和,屈丹安.多夹层盐矿油气储库水溶建腔夹层垮塌控制技术[J].岩土工程学报,2011.33(12):1958-1963.
    [178]程丽娟,李仲奎,徐彬,杨强等.盐岩密集储库群布置方式优化及连锁破坏研究[J].岩土工程学报,2011,30(2):296-305.
    [179]屈丹安,杨春和,任松.金坛盐穴地下储气库地表沉降预测研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010.29(增1):2706-2711.
    [180]张宁,张强勇,李术才,等.盐岩地下储气库地表沉降风险失效概率的计算分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012.31:3758-3762.
    [181]贾超,李朋,张强勇,李术才.盐岩储气库运营期失效概率分析研究[J].岩十力学,,2012.33(11):3352-3358.
    [182]张强勇,段杭,向文,等.极端风险因素影响的深部层状盐岩地下储气库群运营稳定三维流变模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2012,31(9):1766-1774.
    [183]袁广杰,申瑞臣,袁进平,等.盐穴储气库密闭测试技术的研究与应用[J].石油学报,2007.28(4):119-121.
    [184]张宁.深部层状盐岩地下储气库的风险评价与分析研究[0].山东大学博士学位论文,2012.
    [185]刘建,宋娟,张强勇,等.多随机因素作用下储气库套管运行期安全性分析[J].岩土力学,2012,33(12):3721-3728.
    [186]张幸福,谢广禄,等.大张坨地下储气库运行模式分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003.14(4):241-244.
    [187]曹林.盐穴地下储气库注采热工性能模拟[J].天然气工业,2008.25(8):34-37.
    [188]丁国生.金坛盐穴储气库单腔库容计算及运行动态模拟[J].油气储运,2007.26(1):23-27.
    [189]王皆明,姜风光.地下储气库注采动态预测[J].天然气工业,2009.29(2):108-110.
    [190]严宇,谭羽非,张碧波.盐穴型地下储气库调峰优化控制[J].油气储运,2009.28(1):7-9.
    [191]姚雪梅.地下工程施工安全风险管理系统研究[D].武汉理工大学.2010.
    [192]王景新.安全事件管理系统关键技术研究[D].国防科学技术大学.2007.
    [193]杨勇.业务运营支撑管理系统中数据接口通信模式的研究与应用[D].北京邮电大学.2009.
    [194]杨娟娟,武忠.面向业务流程的知识管理系统建模研究[J1.情报杂志.2009(3),121-125.
    [195]黄立威,黄伟,冯径.支持软件质量控制的软件配置管理研究[J].计算机技术与发展.2011(7),50-53.
    [196]马竹娟,汪宏喜.一种基于关系数据库XML存储方案的数据库模型[J].计算机系统应用.2011(4).203-206.
    [197]周傲英,金澈清,王国仁,等.不确定性数据管理技术研究综述[J].计算机学报.2009(1).1-16.
    [198]崔东亮,冯国奇,王成恩.面向可变流程设计的复杂产品工程数据管理方法[J].计算机集成制造系统.2009(10).1907-1913.
    [199]杨飞,尹宝林.面向业务语义的统一工作流数据管理[J].计算机集成制造系统.2009(6).1155-1164.
    [200]Stephen Withall. Software Requirement Patterns [M]. Oversea Publishing House.2007.6.
    [201]Thomas Stahl. Model-Driven Software Develop:Technology, Engineering,Management [Ml. John Wiley&Sons.2006.12.
    [202]李政仪.Web程序设计[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
    [203]陈杰MATLAB宝典[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2007.
    [204]阮沈勇,王永利,等MATLAB程序设计[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004.
    [205]杨晖SQLServer数据库性能优调技术分析[J].信息与电脑(理论版),2011(11):168-169.
    [206]周均民,张宏方,等.基于SQL Server在应用系统中的优化[J].山东煤炭科技,2012(1):98-99.
    [207]刘雷峰,叶邦彦,等.基于SQL Server模糊查询的包装信息智能标识研究[J].科学技术与工程,2011(8):1931-1935.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700