用户名: 密码: 验证码:
寻找真我:菲利普·罗斯小说中的身份问题
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
菲利普罗斯(1933—)是当代美国最有影响力的犹太作家。从1955年初登文坛发表第一部小说集,到2012年底宣布搁笔,在长达半个多世纪的写作过程中,罗斯关注的中心问题是身份问题。作为出生和生活在美国的第三代犹太移民,美国多元、民主的文化环境使得罗斯对自我身份的认识与其父辈不同,他对美国文化没有隔阂感,安于作个美国人。然而作为一位犹太族裔作家,罗斯也注定了要与自己的族裔属性有着千丝万缕的联系。罗斯以第三代犹太移民开放的心态进行的创作,触怒了犹太读者,读者指责罗斯忘记犹太人苦难的历史。读者的批评让罗斯开始思考犹太民族自我身份定义问题。此外,随着思想认识的成熟,将美国视为“故乡”的罗斯,也意识到这一文化环境内部存在各种问题,现实中的美国人所奉行的核心价值理念与《独立宣言》等文献中倡导的自由、民主精神形成错位,致使社会上大量庸人出现,身份的稳定感失落。因此,族裔身份问题,美国人身份价值观隐含的危机,使得罗斯的小说始终将人的身份存在作为关注的焦点。罗斯以第三代犹太人的身份视角,书写了以父辈为代表的传统犹太人的身份观,如“病态的不安感”、“无根的漂泊感”等,思考了这种悖谬性身份观念形成的原因,同时罗斯也在探寻,是否成为一个“美国人”便解决了身份困境的问题。在罗斯看来,不论是成为一个美国人还是一个犹太人,身份困境的原因,从根本上与所处的政治环境与文化气候有关,而政治文化对人的影响又并不总是直接的,而往往通过打造空间、规训身体等间接方式塑造着人的身份。因此,本论文从身体与空间书写、政治与社会关系等方面,以文本分析与文化阐释相结合的方法,来探讨罗斯的身份观念及其对身份观念的艺术表达,以最大限度地理解罗斯身份追寻的真谛。
In reading Roth’s works written in different periods, Itry to feel Roth’s inner creative power and creative thinking.I have found that “identity issue” is the theme of hiscreation or the issue of the writer’s interest, which enteredRoth’s creative consciousness very early and has beenconstantly written. The identity consciousness of “essencepresence” became disintegrated in the20thcentury, and how torestore an awareness of deterministic identity became a themeof Western culture in the20thcentury. As a Jew living in theUnited States, Roth is particularly sensitive to the feelingsof identity loss. He is fascinated by the mystery of Jewishidentity and very concerned about the identity situation ofJewish immigrants in American society. He thought about themetropolitan identity anxiety in the U.S.A. and was angry aboutthe fact that there emerged a large number of “mediocre”people who had lost their pursuit of identity. Rothbegan to raise a profound question in his works: How do we becomeourselves like now? And started to re-write about identity andexplore journey of seeking the true spiritual self. How do webecome ourselves like now?
     Roth’s multiple identities have enabled him to understanddeeply modern people’s identity multiplicity, especially inthe United States, a large country of immigrants. Roth also seesthat the determining factors of modern people’s awareness ofidentity are not one-fold but multiple. Therefore, Roth’sworks do not attempt to give any definitions for people, butthey inspect various factors that affect the sense of identityof American Jews and ordinary Americans. He is seeking the truthabout the self through different perspectives, different waysof thinking and different means, which constitutes the fouraspects of Roth’s pursuit of true self:1. Return to the body;2. re-examining the modes of Jewish identity existence thediscrete space;3. Studying the marginalization of AmericanJews in political and historical event, and the impact of falsepolitics on U.S. citizen’s identity;4. The identity crisis problems brought about by crises of social and family relations.Roth’s examinations of identity from various angles involvehis personal experience, a lot of knowledge of historical andcultural backgrounds. Adopting the method of integratingcultural analysis and text interpretation, this paper studiesthe identity issue in Roth’s works from the aforementionedfour aspects for the purpose of full understanding of thecreative ideas and methods of the Roth works about identitywriting.
     The introduction, on the one hand, sorts out and summarizesthe available studies of Roth, especially the identity issue.On the other hand, it generalizes the concept of “identityproblem” expressed by himself and his novels.
     Chapter One mainly explores Roth’s creative ideas andpractices of writing about identity with the body. The existingresearches on the identity issues in Roth’s novels have notedRoth’s fascination with sex. While over-interpreting thesexual meaning, relevant studies have ignored Roth’sexuberant writing about the “body”. It can be argued that,while exploring the true self, Roth tries to return to the body. Fascination with the body and developing the flesh connotationform important aspects of Roth’s effort to realize the humantrue self and mull over the relationship between culture andhuman beings.
     Chapter Two discusses the relationship between spatialshaping and identity in Roth’s novels. The existing papers onRoth’s identity issue pay attention to the impacts ofhistorical memory and trauma on the identity and destiny of thecharacters in the novels, but they have ignored space. TheJewish Diaspora lifestyle makes space play an important rolein the formation of the Jewish culture and its national identity.Geographical cultural differences give rise to different viewsof the Jews from different places on the same national identity.The rehabilitation of the Jewish state of Israel wasinterpreted as “pan-home”, and the culture and identity ofthe “homeless” Jews were faced with the conundrum ofreinterpretation and redefinition. The synchronicity of thegeographical homeland aroused Roth’s anxiety about identity,so, in his novels, he tried to express the relationship betweenhis worries about the Jewish national feature and identity and space. In addition, the relationship between space and identityin Roth's novels is represented by his thinking of the spatialrelationship between writers’ creation and space, hisexamination of the changes of the national identity awarenessof the Jews induced by the spatial changes of American society,his writing about the people’s experience in Americanmetropolises, as well as the construction of suburban life–his ideal living space for people. The thesis discusses all theabove problems unprecedentedly, for there have been no scholarsin China who have probed Roth’s works from that perspective.
     Chapter Three writes about the search for identity inpolitical relations. Roth’s reflections on American Jewishidentity are done in combination with his politicalinvestigations. The close relationship between the fate of theJews and politics makes the Jews sensitive to politics, and Rothis no exception. Roth’s works contain a large number ofpolitical writings. Roth does not write for the sake of politics,but he writes about the relationship between the political andhuman identity and destiny. The available papers on therelationship between the characters in his novels and politics tend to focus on reviews of political background and history,attributing the figures’ tragic fate to political andhistorical tragedies, but overlook Roth’s political ideas andsome important factors in the formation of his political ideas,for instance, the reflection of the Holocaust and the adherenceof the spirit of American freedom. Elucidation of therelationship between the identity writing in Roth’s fictionsand politics with no consideration of this concern will nottouch the core idea and the original intention of politicalcriticism in the writer’s writing about identity. Ponderingover the history of the Holocaust enabled Roth to form ahumanitarian idea and concept of justice. Combined with thespirit of American freedom, Roth is based on humanitariangrounds and his original intention to defend American freedomand democracy in the revelation of the false politics in theUnited States and the harm of routine false political ideologyon the national ideology.
     Chapter Four is about the search for identity in socialrelations. Human beings are not isolated individuals. Humanhappiness and integrity need to be achieved in harmonious relations with others. Roth also pursues the true self in thethreefold social relation: the relationship between father andson, gender relationship and the relationship between thewriting’s identity and the self in life. This chapter looksat Roth’s identity awareness and his writing values in hisautobiographical writing and fictionalized autobiography. Theexisting papers on this issue often interpret Roth’sautobiography as factual materials and use them as argumentsto prove the relationship between his novel writing and his life.Few papers have reviewed the writer’s concepts of identity andarts from the perspective of interpreting the aesthetic formin Roth’s autobiography. This is the vacuum that this thesisis to fill in with its innovation. Besides, the analysis of therelations between the sexes investigates Roth’s understandingof gender identity and refutes some reviewers’ views that Rothis a “misogynist” and “sexist”. In my opinion, the “femaleobjectification” writing in his novels is related to theincompleteness of his Jewish identity and to his pursuit of aunique aesthetic effect.
     The concluding part summarizes the features of Roth’s writing about identity.
引文
1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P7
    2原注: Howe, Irving. Philip Roth Reconsidered[C].Critical Essays on Philip Roth. Sanford Pinsker, ed. Boston:G.K.Hall,1982, P229-244.转引自:孟宪华.追寻、僭越与迷失——菲利普罗斯后期小说中犹太人生存状态研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011,第7页
    1原注:Larner, Jeremy. The Conversion of the Jews[C].Critical Essays on Philip Roth. Sanford Pinsker, ed. Boston:G.K.Hall,1982, P45.转引自:孟宪华.追寻、僭越与迷失——菲利普罗斯后期小说中犹太人生存状态研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011,第7页
    2原注:Gross,John.“Marjorie Morningster PhD”[C].Critical Essays on Philip Roth. Sanford Pinsker, ed. Boston:G.K.Hall,1982, P40-43.转引自:孟宪华.追寻、僭越与迷失——菲利普罗斯后期小说中犹太人生存状态研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011,第7页
    1孟宪华.追寻、僭越与迷失——菲利普罗斯后期小说中犹太人生存状态研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011,第18页.
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P128
    1Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK: Cambridge University Press,2007,p162
    2Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK: Cambridge University Press,2007,P159
    3Kramer, M P&Nesher, H W, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Jewish American Literature [C].UK: CambridgeUniversity Press,2003,P272
    1转引自:Eagle, Christopher Eagle.“Angry Because She Stutters”: Stuttering, Violence, and the Politics of Voice inAmerican Pastoral and Sorry [J/OL].Philip Roth Studies, Spring.2012,P19
    2埃里克方纳.美国自由的故事[M].王希译.北京:商务印书局,2005,第9页
    1Kramer, M P&Nesher, H W, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Jewish American Literature [C].UK: CambridgeUniversity Press,2003,P272-273
    1埃里克方纳.美国自由的故事[M].王希译.北京:商务印书局,2005,第8页
    1Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism [C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P3649-57
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第25页
    2Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism [C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P728-36
    1威尔·金利卡.多元文化的公民身份——一种自由主义的少数群体权利理论[M].马莉,张昌耀译.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2009,第20页
    2威尔·金利卡.多元文化的公民身份——一种自由主义的少数群体权利理论[M].马莉,张昌耀译.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2009,第19页
    3Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism [C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P730-39
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第48页
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第67页
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第255页
    2菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第240-241页
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第274页
    1玛莉莲亚隆.乳房的历史[M/OL].何颖怡译.北京:华龄出版社,2001,第7页
    2同脚注1,第12页
    1玛莉莲亚隆.乳房的历史[M/OL].何颖怡译.北京:华龄出版社,2001,第159页
    1米歇尔福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成等译.北京:三联书店,2003,第169-170页
    2米歇尔福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成等译.北京:三联书店,2003,第167页
    1丹尼卡瓦拉罗.文化理论关键词[M].张卫东等译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007,第105页
    2菲利普·罗斯.乳房[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版社,2010,第112页
    1菲利普·罗斯.凡人[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第127页
    2克里斯希林.身体与社会理论[M].李康译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010,第185页
    1大卫勒布雷东.人类身体史和现代性[M].王圆圆译.上海:上海文艺出版社,2010,第218页
    2同脚注1,第183页
    1克里斯希林.身体与社会理论[M].李康译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010,第172页
    2菲利普·罗斯.垂死的肉身[M].吴其尧译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004,第96页
    1克里斯希林.身体与社会理论[M].李康译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010,第181页
    2菲利普·罗斯.垂死的肉身[M].吴其尧译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004,第109页
    1Philip Roth Studies, Reviews2011Spring,p109.
    1Michel Foucault, Jay Miskowiec.“Of Other Spaces”[J].Diacritics, Vol.16, No.1. Spring.1986,P22
    2Edward Soja. Third Space: Journeys to los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden,MA:Blackwell,1996.转引自Wesley A.Kort..Place and Space in Modern Fiction [M]Gainesville: University Press ofFlorida,2004,P3
    3爱德华·索亚等著.第三空间:去往落砂机和其他真实和想象地方的旅程[C].上海:上海教育出版社,2005,第9页
    4谢纳.空间生产与文化表征——空间转向视域中的文学研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010,第4页
    5丹尼卡瓦拉罗.文化理论关键词[M].张卫东等译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007,第3页
    1谢纳.空间生产与文化表征——空间转向视域中的文学研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010,第79页
    1赵莉华.空间政治:托尼·莫里森小说研究[M].成都:四川大学出版社.2011,第17页
    2赵莉华.空间政治:托尼莫里森小说研究[M].成都:四川大学出版社.2011,第9页
    1撒母耳S.科亨.犹太教——一种生活之道[M].徐新等译.四川:四川人民出版社,2009,第214页
    2刘洪一.犹太文化要义[M].北京:商务印书局,2004,第31页
    1朱维之主编.希伯来文化[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2004,第4页
    1刘洪一.犹太文化要义[M].北京:商务印书局,2004,第48页
    1冯基华.犹太文化与以色列社会政治发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010,第19页
    1托马斯索威尔.美国种族简史[M/OL].沈宗美译.北京:中信出版社,2011,第46页
    2齐格尔鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].杨渝东等译.南京:译林出版社,2002,第21页
    3同脚注2
    1冯基华.犹太文化与以色列社会政治发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010,第2页
    1欧文豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995,第572页
    1沃尔特·拉克.犹太复国主义史[M].徐方等译.上海:上海三联书店,1992,第727、730页
    1Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism[C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P3773-81
    1迈克克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2007,第47页
    1菲利普罗斯.行话——与名作家论文艺[M].蒋道超译.南京:译林出版社,2010,第188页
    2Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism[C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P6501-37
    1欧文豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995,第573页
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第58页
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第59页
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第61页
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第107页
    1Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism[C/OL]. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press,2005,P6502-40
    1汪民安.家庭的空间政治[J].东方艺术.2007(02):19
    1菲利普罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第151页
    2菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第153页
    1石竞琳.欧洲基督教世界反犹主义的历史原因[J].历史教学问题.2010(03):84
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第315-316页
    2肖庆华.都市空间与文学空间——多丽丝莱辛小说研究[M].成都:四川辞书出版社,2008,第102页
    1肖庆华.都市空间与文学空间——多丽丝莱辛小说研究[M].成都:四川辞书出版社,2008,第103页
    2迈克克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2007,第28页
    1菲利普·罗斯.反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988,第347页
    2迈克·克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2007,第31页
    3徐扬.论英国维多利亚小说中的庄园[D].南京:南京大学文学院,2008,第i页
    1转引自Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism in post-cold warAmericanLiterature [D].The university of North Carolina at Greensboro College,2009,P231.
    1菲利普罗斯.再见,哥伦布[M].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第84页
    1转引自Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism in post-cold warAmericanLiterature [D].The university of North Carolina at Greensboro College,2009,P54
    1菲利普·罗斯.再见,哥伦布[M].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第6页
    2菲利普罗斯.再见,哥伦布[M].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第38页
    1欧文豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995,第167页
    1迈克克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2007,第95页
    1菲利普罗斯.再见,哥伦布[M].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009,第560页
    2肖庆华.都市空间与文学空间——多丽丝·莱辛小说研究.四川:四川辞书出版社,2008年,第7页
    3周小仪.唯美主义与消费文化[M.北京:北京大学出版社,2002,第19页
    1转引自Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism in post-cold warAmericanLiterature [D].The university of North Carolina at Greensboro College,2009,P57
    2理查德利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009,第3页
    3Isin, Engin F.“Metropolis Unbound: Legislators and Interpreters of Urban Form.” City Live and City Forms:Critical Urban Research and Canadian Urbanism. Toronto: University of Toronto,1996:98-127
    4菲利普·罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第46页
    1汪民安.家庭的空间政治[J].东方艺术.2007(02):19
    2菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第74页
    1转引自Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism in post-cold warAmericanLiterature [D].The university of North Carolina at Greensboro College,2009,P234
    1转引自Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism in post-cold warAmericanLiterature [D].The university of North Carolina at Greensboro College,2009,P236
    1菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第49页
    1理查德利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009,第243页
    2理查德利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009,第258页
    1理查德利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009,第248页
    1理查德利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009,第98页
    1菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第47页
    2菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第14页
    1菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第14页
    1菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第105页
    1菲利普罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第22页
    1转引自:Eagle, Christopher Eagle.“Angry Because She Stutters”: Stuttering, Violence, and the Politics of Voice inAmerican Pastoral and Sorry [J/OL].Philip Roth Studies, Spring.2012,P19
    2徐世博,姜涛.论“美国三部曲”的新历史主义特征[J].学术交流.2011(06):185
    1Searles, George J, ed. Conversations with Philip Roth [C/OL]. Jackson and London: University of Mississippi,1992,P86
    1Searles, George J, ed. Conversations with Philip Roth [C/OL]. Jackson and London: University of Mississippi,1992,P87
    2Nadel, Ira B. Critical Companion to Philip Roth: A literary Reference to His Life and Work [G]. New York:Hermitage Publishing Services,2011,P184
    1托马斯索威尔.美国种族简史[M/OL].沈宗美译.北京:中信出版社,2011,第40页
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P63
    1Nadel, Ira B. Critical Companion to Philip Roth: A literary Reference to His Life and Work [G]. New York:Hermitage Publishing Services,2011,P323
    1Philip Roth. Reading Myself and Others [C]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1975,P136
    2Milowitz,Steven.Philip roth considered:The concentrationary Universe of the Amercian Writer[M].NewYork:Garland,2000,P.ix
    3阿尔弗雷德格罗塞.身份认同的困境[M].王鲲译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010,第4页
    1菲利普·罗斯.退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011,第73页
    1潘一禾.西方文学中的政治[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2006,第6页
    2转引自:西方文学中的政治.瓦茨拉夫哈维尔.政治与余量,哈维尔文集[C]崔卫平译,中华书库<外国文学书库>,哈维尔文集.见www.zpebtdc.com/old/ebook/foreign-literature/novls/ha-weier2002-1-86
    3Eloise Knapp Hay. The Political Novels of Joseph Conrad: a critical study [M]. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress,1963,P177
    4Howe, Irving. Politics and the Novel[M/OL].New York: Horizon Press,1957,P17
    1Moynihan, Sinead. Passing into The Present: Contemporary American Fiction of Racial and Gender Passing [M].Manchester, Manchester University Press,2010,P8
    2Rankine,Patrice D.Passing as Tragedy: Philip Roth’s The Human Stain, the Oedipus Myth, and the Self-MadeMan [J/OL].Critique.2005(47):101
    1菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003年,第105页
    1曾艳钰.“政治正确”之下的认同危机《春季日语教程》和《人性的污秽》研究[J].当代外国文学.2012(02):81.
    1菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第110页
    3白爱宏.抵制异化:索尔贝娄小说研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012,第166页
    1Rattansi, Ali. Racism: A Very Short Introduction [C]. New York: Oxford University Press,2007,P133
    2菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第134页
    1赵乐芳.《人性的污秽》中的伦理道德观.[J/OL].青年文学家.2009(01):98-104.
    1曾艳钰.“政治正确”之下的认同危机——《春季日语教程》和《人性的污秽》研究[J].当代外国文学.2012(02):80
    2人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第6页
    3菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第110页
    1菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第39页
    1菲利普·罗斯.人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003,第2页
    2威廉·范·饿康纳.美国现代七大小说家[M].张爱玲等译.北京:三联书店,1988,第168页
    1菲利普汉森.汉娜阿伦特——历史、政治与公民身份[M].刘佳林译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007,第96页
    1转引自:菲利普汉森.汉娜阿伦特——历史、政治与公民身份[M].刘佳林译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007,第114页
    2胡亚敏.美国越南战争:从想象到幻灭——论美国越战叙事文学对越战的解构[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2009,第37页
    1应用汉语词典.商务印书馆辞书研究中心编.北京:商务印书馆,2000,第1370页
    2刘婷.“我不在那儿”——论保罗·奥斯特的身份诗学[D].天津:南开大学文学院,2010,第28页
    3申丹.叙述学与小说文体学研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001,第13页
    1转引自:鲁伊基·肇嘉.父性——历史、心理与文化的视野[M/OL].张敏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006,第1页
    2刘洪一.“父与子”:文化母题和文学主题——论美国犹太文学的一种主题模式[J].外国文学评论.1992(02):42
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P8
    1Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK: Cambridge University Press,2007,P159
    2Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P162
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P113
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P14
    3Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK: Cambridge University Press,2007,P162
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P47
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P13
    2鲁伊基肇嘉.父性——历史、心理与文化的视野[M/OL].张敏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006,第6页
    1菲利普·罗斯.遗产——一个真实的故事[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2006,第124页
    1菲利普·罗斯.遗产——一个真实的故事[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2006,第120页
    2Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P130
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P172
    1菲利普·罗斯.遗产——一个真实的故事[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2006,第116页
    2Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK: Cambridge University Press,2007,P166
    1菲利普罗斯.鬼作家[M].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010,第344页
    1菲利普·罗斯.鬼作家[M].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010,第347页
    1菲利普·罗斯.鬼作家[M].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010,第283页
    1菲利普·罗斯.鬼作家[M].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010,第320页
    1菲利普·罗斯.鬼作家[M].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010,第364页
    1阿兰德波顿.身份的焦虑[M].陈广兴、南治国译.上海:上海译文出版社,2007,第3-5页
    1弗洛伊德.摩西与一神教[M].李展开译.北京:北京三联书店,1986,第98页
    1Philip Roth. Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969,P5
    2Philip Roth. Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969,P6
    3Philip Roth. Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969,P4
    4鲁伊基肇嘉.父性——历史、心理与文化的视野[M/OL].张敏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006,第18页
    1欧文豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995,第166页
    2欧文豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995,第167页
    1刘洪一.“父与子”:文化母题和文学主题——论美国犹太文学的一种主题模式[J].外国文学评论.1992(02):41
    1转引自:Gooblar, David. Introduction: Roth and Women [J].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012,P7
    2转引自:Gooblar, David. Introduction: Roth and Women [J].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012,P8
    1转引自:Gooblar, David. Introduction: Roth and Women [J].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012,P9
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P164
    3Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P93
    1Gooblar, David. Introduction: Roth and Women[OL/J].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012,P13
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P111
    1Philip Roth. Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969,P221
    2Philip Roth. Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969,P283
    1菲力浦勒热讷.自传契约[M].杨国政译.北京:三联书店,2001,第44页
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P163
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P162
    2菲力浦勒热讷.自传契约[M].杨国政译.北京:三联书店,2001,第44页
    1Saunders, Max. Self Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction, and the Forms of Modern Literature [M]. NY:Oxford University Press,2010,P297
    2Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P8
    1Philip Roth. The Facts: A Novelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988,P172
    2Smith, Sidonie﹠Watson, Julia. Reading Autobiography: A Guild for Interpreting Life Narratives [M].London:University of Minnesota Press,2001,P186
    1Kramer, M P&Nesher, H W, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Jewish American Literature [C].UK: CambridgeUniversity Press,2003,P270
    [1]垂死的肉身[M].吴其尧译.上海:上海译文出版社,2004.
    [2]反生活[M].楚至大、张运霞译.湖南:湖南人民出版社,1988.
    [3]凡人[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009.
    [4]鬼作家[C].董乐山译.北京:中央编译出版社,2010.
    [5]行话——与名作家论文艺[M].蒋道超译.南京:译林出版社,2010.
    [6]美国牧歌[M].罗小云译.南京:译林出版社,2004.
    [7]人性的污秽[M].刘珠还译.南京:译林出版社,2003.
    [8]乳房[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版社,2010.
    [9]退场的鬼魂[M].姜向明译.上海:上海译文出版,2011.
    [10]我作为男人的一生[M].陈龙等译.湖南:湖南文艺出版社,1992.
    [11]我嫁了共产党人[M].李维拉译.台湾:木马文化有限公司,2005.
    [12]遗产——一个真实的故事[M].彭伦译.北京:人民文学出版社,2006.
    [13]再见,哥伦布[C].张迪等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2009.
    [1]Exit Ghost [M].Boston: Houghton Mifflin,2007.
    [2]Our Gang (Starring Tricky and His Friends)[M]. New York: Random House,1971.
    [3]Portnoy’s Complaint [M]. New York: Random House,1969.
    [4]Reading Myself and Others[C]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1975.
    [5]The Facts: ANovelist’s Autobiography [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,1988.
    [6]When She Was Good [M]. New York: Random House,1967.
    [1]Brooks, Peter. Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative [M/OL]. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,1993.
    [2]Brauner, David. Philip Roth (Contemporary American and Canadian Writers)[M].UK: Manchester University Press,2007.
    [3] Hay, Eloise Knapp. The Political Novels of Joseph Conrad: a critical study [M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [4]Howe, Irving. Politics and the Novel [M/OL].New York: Horizon Press,1957.
    [5]Isin, Engin F. Metropolis Unbound: Legislators and Interpreters of Urban Form.City Live and City Forms: Critical Urban Research and Canadian Urbanism. Toronto:University of Toronto,1996.
    [6]Jackson, Kenneth T. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States[M]. New York: Oxford University Press,1985.
    [7]Kramer, Michael P.&Wirth-Nesher, Hana, ed. The Cambridge Companion toJewish American Literature [C].UK: Cambridge University Press,2003.
    [8]Kaplan, Dana Evan, ed. The Cambridge companion to American Judaism[C/OL].New York: Cambridge University Press,2005.
    [9]Moynihan, Sinead. Passing Into The Present: Contemporary American Fiction ofRacial and Gender Passing [M]. Manchester: Manchester University of Press,2010.
    [10]Meyers, Helene. Identity Papers: Contemporary Narratives of American Jewishness [M].New York: State University of New York,2011.
    [11]Milowitz,Steven. Philip Roth considered: The concentrationary Universe of theAmerican Writer [M].New York: Garland,2000.
    [12]Nadel, Ira B. Critical Companion to Philip Roth: A literary Reference to His Lifeand Work [G]. New York: Hermitage Publishing Services,2011.
    [13]Parrish, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philip Roth[C/OL].UK:Cambridge University Press,2007.
    [14]Rattansi, Ali. Racism: A Very Short Introduction[C].New York: Oxford UniversityPress,2007.
    [15]Smith, Sidonie﹠Watson, Julia. Reading Autobiography: A Guild for InterpretingLife Narratives [M].London: University of Minnesota Press,2001.
    [16]Saunders, Max. Self Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction, and the Formsof Modern Literature [M]. NY: Oxford University Press,2010.
    [17]Searles, George J, ed. Conversations with Philip Roth[C/OL]. Jackson andLondon: University of Mississippi,1992.
    [18]Safer, Elaine B. Mocking the Age: The Later Novels of Philip Roth [M]. Albany:State University of New York Press,2006.
    [19]Siegel, Ben&Halio, Jay L, ed. Turning Up the Flame: Philip Roth’s Later Novels[M].Newark: University of Delaware Press,2010.
    [20]Shechner, Mark. Up Society’s Ass, Copper: Rereading Philip Roth [M]. Madison:University of Wisconsin Press,2003.
    [1]安东尼·吉登斯.亲密关系的变革——现代社会中的性、爱和爱欲[M].陈永国、汪民安等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.
    [2]艾伦·布鲁姆.走向封闭的美国精神[M].缪青等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1994.
    [3]阿兰·德波顿.身份的焦虑[M].陈广兴、南治国译.上海:上海译文出版社,2007.
    [4]阿巴·埃班.犹太史[M/OL].阎瑞松译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986.
    [5]阿尔弗雷德·格罗塞.身份认同的困境[M].王鲲译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.
    [6]爱德华·W·苏贾.后现代地理学[M].王文赋译.北京:商务印书局,2004.
    [7]埃里克·方纳.美国自由的故事[M].王希译.北京:商务印书局.2005.
    [8]大卫·勒布雷东.人类身体史和现代性[M].王圆圆译.上海:上海文艺出版社,2010.
    [9]白爱宏.抵制异化:索尔·贝娄小说研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
    [10]布莱恩·特纳.公民身份的条件[M].潘华凌译.长春:吉林出版集团有限公司,2007.
    [11]丹尼·卡瓦拉罗.文化理论关键词[M].张卫东等译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.
    [12]丹尼尔·霍夫曼主编.美国当代文学(上)[C].黄梅译.中国文艺联合出版公司,1984.
    [13]戴维·鲁斯克.没有郊区的城市[M].王英等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2011.
    [14]菲力浦·勒热讷.自传契约[M].杨国政译.北京:三联书店,2001.
    [15]菲利·普汉森.汉娜·阿伦特——历史、政治与公民身份[M].刘佳林译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.
    [16]赫伯特·马尔库塞.爱欲与文明——对弗洛伊德思想的哲学探讨[M/OL].黄勇等译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
    [17]黄华.权利,身体与自我——福柯与女性主义文学批评[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
    [18]亨利·斯坦利·贝内特.《英国庄园生活:1150-1400年农民生活状况研究》[M/OL].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
    [19]胡亚敏.美国越南战争:从想象到幻灭——论美国越战叙事文学对越战的解构[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2009.
    [20]江宁康.美国当代文学与美利坚民族认同[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2008.
    [21]基斯·福克斯.公民身份[M].郭中华译.长春:吉林出版集团有限公司,2009.
    [22]克里斯·希林.身体与社会理论[M].李康译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
    [23]卡夫卡.变形记[M].谢莹莹译等译.北京:人民文学出版社,2012.
    [24]刘洪一.走向文化诗学——美国犹太小说研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
    [25]——.犹太文化要义[M].北京:商务印书局,2004.
    [26]理查德·利罕.文学中的城市——知识与文化的历史[M].吴子枫译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
    [27]鲁伊基·肇嘉.父性——历史、心理与文化的视野[M/OL].张敏等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
    [28]利奥·博萨尼.弗洛伊德式的身体——精神分析与艺术[M].潘源译.上海:上海三联书店,2009.
    [29]莱昂内尔·特里林.诚与真——诺顿演讲集,1995-1970年[C].刘佳林译.江苏教育出版社,2006.
    [30]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成等译.北京:三联书店,2003.
    [31]——.性经验史[M].余碧平译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
    [32]——.疯癫与文明[M].刘北成等译.北京:三联书店,2009.
    [33]迈克·克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2007.
    [34]莫里斯·迪克斯坦.伊甸园之门——六十年代的美国文化[M].方晓光译.南京:译林出版社,2007.
    [35]——.途中的镜子:文学与现实世界[M].刘玉宇译.上海:上海三联出版社,2008.
    [36]玛莉莲·亚隆.乳房的历史[M/OL].何颖怡译.北京:华龄出版社,2001.
    [37]尼克·史蒂文森主编.文化与公民身份[M].潘华凌译.长春:吉林出版集团有限公司,2007.
    [38]欧文·豪.父辈的世界[M].王海良等译.上海:上海三联书店,1995.
    [39]齐格尔·鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].杨渝东等译.南京:译林出版社,2002.
    [40]——.共同体[M].欧阳景根译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.
    [41]乔国强.美国犹太文学[M].北京:商务印书局,2008.
    [42]热拉尔·热奈特.叙事话语、新叙事话语[M/OL].王文融译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1990.
    [43]申丹.叙述学与小说文体学研究[M/OL].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
    [44]撒母耳·S.科亨.犹太教——一种生活之道[M].徐新等译.四川:四川人民出版社,2009.
    [45]托马斯·索威尔.美国种族简史[M/OL].沈宗美译.北京:中信出版社,2011.
    [46]唐红梅.种族、性别与身份认同——美国黑人女作家艾丽丝·沃克、托尼·莫里森小说创作研究[M].北京:民族出版社,2006.
    [47]王钦峰.后现代主义小说论略[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001.
    [48]威尔·金利卡.多元文化的公民身份——一种自由主义的少数群体权利理论[M].马莉,张昌耀译.北京:中央民族大学出版社,2009.
    [49]威廉·范·厄康纳.美国现代七大小说家[M].张爱玲等译.北京:三联书店,1988.
    [50]沃尔特·拉克.犹太复国主义史[M].徐方等译.上海:上海三联书店,1992.
    [51]西格蒙德·弗洛伊德.论文学与艺术[M/OL].常宏等译.北京:国际文化出版社,2001.
    [52]谢纳.空间生产与文化表征——空间转向视域中的文学研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
    [53]肖庆华.都市空间与文学空间——多丽丝·莱辛小说研究[M].成都:四川辞书出版社,2008.
    [54]杨仁敬主编.美国后现代派小说论[C].青岛:青岛出版社,2004.
    [55]杨大春.语言身体他者——当代法国哲学的三大主题[M].北京:三联书店,2007.
    [56]朱维之主编.希伯来文化[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2004.
    [57]朱世达.当代美国文化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
    [58]周小仪.唯美主义与消费文化[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
    [59]赵莉华.空间政治:托尼莫里森小说研究[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2011.
    [1]陈广兴.身体的变形与戏仿:论菲利普·罗斯的《乳房》[J].国外文学.2009(02):98-104.
    [2]陈才.犹太裔美国人的文化身份创伤——以菲利普·罗斯的《反生活》和《美国牧歌》为例[J].外国文学研究.2012(11)下半月:166-168.
    [3]丁卓.《1984》的空间解读[J].东北师大学报.2011(02):120-122.
    [4]冯珠娣,汪民安.日常生活、身体、政治[J].社会学研究.2004(01):107-113.
    [5]高婷.犹太性的传承与超越——以辛格和罗斯为例[J].外国文学.2011(05):102-107.
    [6]黄铁池.不断翻转的万花筒——菲利普·罗斯创作手法流变初探[J].上海师范大学学报.2009(01):56-63.
    [7]——.追寻“希望之乡”——菲利普·罗斯后现代实验小说《反生活》解读[J].外国文学研究.2007(6):97-102.
    [8]贺一舟.《垂死的肉身》中的欲望政治解读[J].作家.2012(12):25-26.
    [9]金万锋,邹云敏.国外菲利普·罗斯研究50年[J].长春工业大学学报.2010(07):7.
    [10]柳建文.冲突与融合:城市空间与族际关系的社会学[J].天津社会科学.2011(6):80-86.
    [11]刘文松.《鬼作家》对《安妮日记》的后现代改写与困惑[J].当代外国文学.2005(04):56-60.
    [12]刘小月.谈菲利普·罗斯《遗产》中的犹太“父与子”关系[J].安徽文学.2011(05):34-35
    [13]刘颖.新现实主义下菲利普·罗斯对犹太人身份的关注[J].科教文汇(下月旬刊).2009(10):256-257.
    [14]林斌.大屠杀后叙事与美国后现代身份政治:论犹太大屠杀的美国化现象[J].外国文学.2009(01):96-104.
    [15]梁毅.身份危机与美国梦——论菲利普·罗斯“美国三部曲”中的“边缘人”[J].作家.2012(12):23-24.
    [16]罗小云.《夏洛克行动》中内心探索的外化策略[J].当代外国文学.2009(03):94-102.
    [17]孟宪华,李如成.“每个人被迫发出最后的吼声”——评菲利普·罗斯的新作《愤怒》[J].外国文学动态.2009(04):25-27.
    [18]朴玉.评菲利普·罗斯在《反美阴谋》中的历史书写策略[J].当代外国文学.2010(04):25-27.
    [19]乔国强.后异化:菲利普·罗斯创作的新视域[J].外国文学研究.2003(05):56-62.
    [20]石竞琳.欧洲基督教世界反犹主义的历史原因[J/OL].历史教学问题.2010(03):79-85
    [21]苏鑫,黄铁池.“我作为男人的一生”——菲利普·罗斯小说中性爱书写的嬗变[J].外国文学研究.2011(1):48-53.
    [22]王长荣.冷战与第二次世界大战后的美国小说[J/OL].上海外国语大学学报.1994(02):66-69
    [23]汪民安.家庭的空间政治[J].东方艺术.2007(02):12-21.
    [24]薛春霞.反叛背后的真实——从《再见,哥伦布》和《波特诺伊的怨诉》看罗斯的叛逆[J].当代外国文学.2010(01):152-160.
    [25]徐世博,姜涛.论“美国三部曲”的新历史主义特征[J].学术交流.2011(06):185-187
    [26]徐新.论反犹主义的开端[J/OL].同济大学学报(人文·社会科学版).1995(05):48-54
    [27]谢荣谦.基督教传统对美国政治、社会的认知及影响[J/OL].世界宗教文化.2011(04):24-29
    [28]袁雪生.以死亡探寻生命的意义:评菲利普·罗斯的《凡夫俗子》[J].南昌大学学报.2009(01):115-117.
    [29]——.身份逾越后的伦理悲剧——评菲利普·罗斯的《美国牧歌》[J].当代外国文学.2010(03):89-96.
    [30]杨金才,朱云.中国菲利普·罗斯研究现状论析[J].当代外国文学.2012(04):151-163.
    [31]杨东.新现实主义小说的叙事空间及主题意蕴探究——以菲利普·罗斯后期小说为例[J].学习与探索.2012(08):129-132.
    [32]余军.“羞辱”之后,菲利普·罗斯神话何在?[J].中国图书评论.2012(04):71-74.
    [33]于雪茹,车凤成.爱无能“黑铁五代”——菲利普·罗斯“美国三部曲”中的伦理道德危机分析[J].作家.2012(10):28-29.
    [34]张军.二战后美国犹太文学的多重母题及其社会功能[J].译林.2012(12):104-112.
    [35]张甜.充满悖论的犹太田园曲——评菲利普·罗斯的《田园牧歌》[J].世界文学评论.2011(1):140-143.
    [36]张军,吴建兰.美国犹太文学中的“父与子”母题及其社会功能研究——以索尔·贝娄的《勿失良辰》[J].江西社会科学.2011(03):100-104.
    [37]曾艳钰.“政治正确”之下的认同危机——《春季日语教程》和《人性的污秽》研究[J].当代外国文学.2012(02):79-87.
    [1]Birnbaum, Milton. Philip Roth: The Artist in the Search of Self [J/OL].Modern Age.(Fall1993):263-272
    [2]Eagle, Christopher Eagle.“Angry Because She Stutters”: Stuttering, Violence, andthe Politics of Voice in American Pastoral and Sorry [J/OL].Philip RothStudies.Spring2012:18-22
    [3]Epstein,Joseph. Fiction: What does Philip Roth want?[J/OL].Commentary (Jan1,1984):62-69
    [4]Feldman, Irving. A Sentimental Education Circa1956[J/OL].Commentary3(Sep1,1962):273-
    [5]Gooblar,David. Introduction: Roth and Women [J/OL].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012:8-15
    [6]Girgus,Sam B. Between“Goodbye,Columbus”and Pornoy: Becoming a Man andWriter in Roth’s Feminist “Family Romance”[J/OL].Studies in American JewishLiterature.(Fall,1989):143-155
    [7]Isaac,Dan.In Defense of Philip Roth[J/OL].Chicago Review(Jan1,1964):84
    [8]Ivanova,Velichka. My Own Foe from the Other Gender:(Mis)representing Womenin The Dying Animal[J/OL].Philip Roth Studies. Spring2012:32-44
    [9]Maslan,Mark. The Faking of the Americans:Passing,Trauma,and National Identityin Philip Roth’s Human Stain[J/OL].Modern Language Quarterly(September2005):365-389
    [10]Michel Foucault, Jay Miskowiec.“Of Other Spaces”[J].Diacritics, Vol.16, No.1.Spring1986:22-29
    [11]Podhoretz,Norman.The Adventures of Philip Roth[J/OL].Commentary(Oct,1,1998):25-38
    [12]Raphael, Frederic. Father, son and family ghosts [J/OL].The Spectator.1991(05):39-42
    [13]Ramon, Donavan L.“You’re Neither one thing nor the other”: Ella Larsen, PhilipRoth, and The Passing Trope [J/OL].Philip Roth Studies.Spring2012:45-61
    [14]Rankine,Patrice D. Passing as Tragedy: Philip Roth’s The Human Stain, theOedipus Myth, and the Self-Made Man [J/OL].Critique.Fall2005(47):101-112
    [15]Solinger,Jason D. Philip Roth: An Annotated Bibliography of UncollectedCriticism1989-1994[J/OL].Studies in American Jewish Literature.(Jan1,1996):61-72
    [16]Vials,Christopher. What can happen here? Philip Roth, Sinclair Lewis, and thelessons of Fascism in the American Liberal Imagination [J/OL].Philip RothStudies.Spring2011:9-26
    [17]Wisse, RuthR. Philip Roth Then and Now[J/OL].Commentary.(Sep1,1981):56-59
    [1]Balter, Barrie. American “I-Deologies”: The Personal and the Political in thePost-Vietnam Novel [D]. The City University of New York,2008.
    [2]Chandler, Aaron. Pursuing unhappiness: City, space, and sentimentalism inpost-cold war American Literature[D].The university of North Carolina at GreensboroCollege,2009.
    [3]Cardon, Lauren S. Marrying in and out of Whiteness: Twentieth-Century Intermarriage Narratives [D]. Tulane University,2008.
    [4]Dromi, Dalia. Configurations of Christ in Jewish and Hebrew Literature[D].University of California,2000.
    [5]Furman, Andrew Scott. Israel through the Jewish American Imagination: A Surveyof Jewish American Literature on Israel,1928-1993[D].Pennsylvania State University,1995.
    [6]George, Alexamder. Philip Roth’s Confessional Narrators: the Growth of Consciousness [D]. Loyola University of Chicago,1979.
    [7]Hogan, Jerry Bruce. The Problem of Identity in the Fiction of Philip Roth[D]. Arizona State University,1979.
    [8]Klimek,Julia.Conversions and counter-narratives: JewishAmerican autobiographies in the twentieth century (Anzia Yezierska, Art Spiegelman, Eva Hoffman, PhilipRoth)[D].University of California Davis,2001.
    [9]Mcdaniel, John Noble. Heroes in the fiction of Philip Roth [D].The Florida StateUniversity, College of Arts and Sciences,1972.
    [10]Medin, Daniel L. Three sons. Franz Kafka and the fiction of J.M.Coetzee,PhilipRoth, and W.G.Sebald (Austria, South Africa, Germany)[D].Washington University,2005.
    [11]Mackin, Jonna. Subject to Laughter: Comedy and Ethnicity in ContemporaryAmerican Fiction [D].University of Pennsylvania,2001.
    [12]Royal, Derek Parker. More than Jewish Mischief: Postmodern Ethnicity in theLater Fiction of Philip Roth [D]. Purdue University,2000.
    [13]Steed, Jason Paul. Joke-making Jews/jokes making Jews: Essays on humor andidentity in American Jewish fiction [D]. University of Nevada,2004.
    [14]Silvey, Patrick.“I’m Just Jewish…” Defining Judaism in Bernard Malamud’s“The Magic Barrel” and Philip Roth’s “Goodbye, Columbus and Five Short Stories”[D]. Truman State University,2011.
    [15]Streip, Katharine Anne. Laughter and Resentment: Marcel Proust, Jean Rhys, andPhilip Roth [D]. University of California, Berkley,1996.
    [16]Short, Vicki L. A Twentieth Century American Tragedy: Defining AristotelianHamartia and Its Allegorical Function in Philip Roth’s I married a communist [D].Florida Atlantic University,2002.
    [17]Tedder,Charles. Utopian discourse: Identity, ethnicity, and community in post-Cold War American narrative [D]. The University of North Carolina,2010.
    [18]Taylor, Charles Lavalle. Figurations of the family in fiction by Toni Morrison,John Updike, James Baldwin, and Philip Roth [D]. University of Michigan,1996.
    [1]高婷.超越犹太性:新现实主义视域下的菲利普·罗斯近期小说研究[D].上海:上海外国语大学外国语学院,2011.
    [2]敬南菲.出路,还是幻象:从《应许之地》《店员》《美国牧歌》看犹太人的美国梦寻[D].上海:上海外国语大学外国语学,2011.
    [3]林莉.论菲利普·罗斯后期小说的历史解读与文学话语[D].厦门:厦门大学外国语学院,2008.
    [4]孟宪华.追寻、僭越与迷失——菲利普罗斯后期小说中犹太人生存状态研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011.
    [5]朴玉.于流散中书写身份认同[D].长春:吉林大学文学院,2008.
    [6]薛春霞.菲利普·罗斯作品中的美国化的犹太性[D].上海:上海外国语大学外国语学院,2010.
    [7]曾艳钰.走向后现代文化多元主义:从罗斯和里德看美国犹太、黑人文学的新趋势厦门[D].厦门:厦门大学外国语学院,2001.
    [8]张生庭.冲突的自我和身份的建构——《被缚的朱克曼三部曲》研究[D].上海:上海外国语大学外国语学院,2004
    [9]杨卫东.《身份的虚构性》[D].北京:北京外国语大学外国语学院,2004.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700