用户名: 密码: 验证码:
煤矿安全生产风险预警研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
中国煤矿行业是一个高危行业,频发的煤矿事故给国家和人民造成了极大的损失,严重影响了和谐社会的建设,并在国际社会上产生了恶劣的影响。在煤矿安全生产管理中,改变目前被动的、经验式的安全管理模式,进而实施主动的、全面风险预警的安全管理模式是有效的解决中国目前煤矿事故频发的关键。煤矿安全生产风险预警是在从定性到定量综合集成方法的指导下,全面收集煤矿风险信息,通过相应的预警知识规则和预警模型提前判断系统的风险状态,达到对当前的不可接受风险进行及时报警、对未来的风险进行实时预警的目的,同时依据预警结果提前做好防控措施,从而消除、减少与控制煤矿事故。实施煤矿安全生产风险预警对贯彻“安全第一、预防为主、综合治理”的安全生产方针,改善目前严峻的煤矿安全生产形势具有重要意义。
     本文以复杂性理论为指导思想,以从定性到定量的综合集成方法为指导方法,融合复杂性科学理论、风险预警理论、安全科学理论、数据挖掘技术等多种理论与方法,结合实证分析,对煤矿安全生产风险预警的相关知识进行了系统的研究。
     首先,研究了煤矿事故的复杂性演化机制,提出了煤矿风险状态预警的新思路。通过分析煤矿生产系统的复杂性特征,认为煤矿生产系统是一个耗散结构系统,更是一个复杂巨系统,从定性到定量综合集成方法是目前解决此类问题的最有效方法,将其作为煤矿风险预警的指导方法;以自组织临界性理论为依据,分别对煤矿死亡事故、由瓦斯引起的死亡事故的幂律关系进行了分析,结果表明中国煤矿事故具有自组织临界性特征;依据煤矿的复杂性特征提出了煤矿风险状态预警的思想,将系统的风险状态分为远离临界态、临界态和超临界态三种状态:煤矿安全生产系统中的风险状态在远离临界态的暂稳态中不断变化,这种变化是一种可预测和可控的变化;临界态是系统风险状态演化的特殊形式,在临界态风险的演化可能是突变的,这种演化是不可预测的,因此临界态的风险是煤矿风险预警的防控重点;超临界态是临界态的进一步正向发展,此时表示系统必然会发生事故,必须立即报警。风险预警的防控措施就是保证系统的风险状态始终保持在远离临界态的暂稳态中。
     其次,研究并初步建立了煤矿风险预警的理论体系。依据“治未病”原理分析了适合煤矿风险预警的“辨证论治”方法;依据风险预警的特点提出了显性危险源和隐性危险源的概念;提出了“以人为本、预防为主、及时适时”的风险预警原则;确立了明确警义-寻找警源-分析警兆-预报警度-防控警情的风险预警程序和煤矿风险预警的方法。
     第三,研究了建立煤矿风险预警指标体系的相关内容。结合层次分析法和集对分析法提出了一种获取指标主观权重的层次-集对分析法,研究了基于粗糙集理论的客观权重获取方法,结合粗糙集和信息熵理论,提出了一种获取客观权重的改进熵权分析法,并分别用实例进行了分析和验证;从人、机、环与管理四个方面,建立了煤矿隐性风险预警的指标体系,并用模糊数学方法确定了指标体系的隶属度函数。
     第四,基于数据挖掘技术建立了煤矿风险预警知识库。提出利用产生式表示法和框架表示法表示煤矿风险预警知识,产生式表示法适合表示显性风险知识,框架表示法则适合表示隐性风险知识;针对产生式表示法,以决策树CART和C5.0为代表进行了风险预警的实证研究,针对框架表示法,以基于案例的推理方法为代表进行了风险预警的实证研究。
     最后,研究并提出了基于集对分析理论的风险预警模型。针对风险的不确定性特征,从联系度对煤矿风险的不确定性描述方面分析了联系度对系统宏观与微观演化的状态描述,并利用突变模型对联系度的不确定性区间进行了分析;对显性风险源提出了三级警度的集对分析模型,对隐性风险源提出了五级警度的集对分析模型,并用实例进行了验证。
The industry of coal mine is a high risk industry in China, the frequent occurrenceof coal mine accidents caused a great loss to the country and people, which seriouslyaffect the construction of harmonious society, it also had a bad influence in internationalcommunity. In the management of coal mine safety production, changing the passiveand the empirical mode of safety management to the proactive and the comprehensiverisk early-warning model is the key to solve the frequent occurrence of coal mineaccidents effectively in China. Meta-synthesis method from qualitative to quantitative isregarded as risk early warning guidance in mine safety production, on the basis ofcollecting comprehensive risk information, judge risk state of system in advance bywarning knowledge rules and warning models, then achieve the goal of alarm in timeabout current unacceptable risks and real-time warning about future risks. Preventionand control measures can be taken in advance based on the results of early warning, sothe coal mine accidents can be eliminated, reduced and controlled. Implementing riskearly-warning in mine safety production has great significance in implementing thepolicy of the safety production, which is Safety First, Prevention Primary,Comprehensive Treatment, it also has great significance in improving the currentserious situation of safe production in coal mine.
     In this paper, complexity theory is regarded as guiding ideology, meta-synthesismethod from qualitative to quantitative is regarded as supervising method, and itintegrates many theories and methods, such as, complex science theory, risk earlywarning theory, data mining technology, combined with the empirical analysis, theknowledge of risk early warning in coal mine safety production was studied.
     First, the complex evolution mechanism of coal mine disasters was studied, thenproposed a new method of early warning on risk state. By analyzing the complexcharacter of mining production system we can find that mining production system is notonly a dissipative structure system, but also a complex giant system, meta-synthesismethod from qualitative to quantitative is the most effective way to solve this problem,so this method is regarded as supervising method of risk early warning; Based on thetheory of self-organized criticality, analyzed the power rate about accidents of peopledied in coal mine and people died in coal mine by gas, the results showed that there is acharacter of self-organized criticality in Chinese coal mine accidents; According to the complex character of coal mine, put forward a idea of early warning on risk state, therisk state of system is divided into three states, they are far away from critical state,critical state and supercritical state, the risk state of system about coal mine safetyproduction is constantly changing during transient and steady state in far away fromcritical state, but those changes can be predicted and controlled; The critical state is aspecial form about the evolution of risk states, the evolution of risk state in critical statemay be mutation, this evolution is unpredictable, so the risk in critical state is the key toprevent and control. The supercritical state is the further positive development of criticalstate, at this state, coal mine accident must occur and must be alarmed at once. Theprevention and control in early warning is to ensure that the risk state must keep intransient and steady state during far away from the critical state all times.
     Second, the theoretical system of the risk early warning in coal mine was studiedand preliminarily established. According to the principle of ‘preventive treatment ofdisease’, analyzed the risk early warning method of ‘syndrome differentiation andtreatment’ in coal mine; The concept of dominant risk source and recessive risk sourcewere proposed by risk early-warning features; Put forward the risk early warningprinciples, which are Human-oriented, Prevention First, Timely and in Time;Established the procedure of risk early warning, they are marking the alert meaning,seeking the alert source, analyzing the alert symptom, forecasting the alarming degreeand putting prevention and control, and established the method of risk early warning.
     Third, the establishment of risk early-warning index system in coal mine wasstudied. Put forward a method to get subjective weight by combining analytic hierarchyprocess (AHP) with set-pair analysis, studied the method to get the objective weightbased on rough set theory, and put forward a method to get objective weight bycombining rough set theory with information entropy theory, then used examples toanalyze and validate; The indexes system of recessive risk were set up by four riskfactors,they are people, machine, environment and management, then the membershipfunction of system indexes were established by fuzzy mathematics method.
     Fourth, the establishment of knowledge base about risk early warning in coal minewas studied on the base of data mining technology. Proposed the representation of riskearly warning in coal mine, they are production representation and frame representation.Production representation is suitable for dominant risk representation, and framerepresentation is suitable for recessive risk representation; Point to productionrepresentation, the decision tree such as classification and regression tree(CART)& C5.0were used to empirical study about risk early warning. Point to framerepresentation, case-based reasoning (CBR) was used to empirical study about risk earlywarning.
     Finally, the risk early warning model based on set-pair analysis theory was studied.Point to the uncertain feature of risk, analyzed the description of risk state byconnection degree based on the description of macro and micro evolution, and analyzedthe uncertain interval of connection degree by catastrophe model; proposed thirdwarning degree for dominant risk and fifth warning degree for recessive risk base onset-pair analysis model, then verified by examples.
引文
[1]杨大明.我国煤矿安全生产现状与对策[J].科技导报,2001,(7):57-60.
    [2]游善生.对煤炭企业社会责任的分析与思考[J].煤矿安全,2006,(10):71-75.
    [3]王春香.本质安全的内涵与外延[J].煤矿安全,2007,38(10):85-87.
    [4]顾海兵.宏观经济预警研究:理论.方法.历史[J].经济理论与经济管理,1997,(4):1-4.
    [5] Kiseok Lee, Shawn Ni. On the dynamic effects of oil price shocks: a study using industrylevel data [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2002,(49):823-852.
    [6] Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P. J. Models of energy use:Putty-Putty versus putty-clay[J]. AmericanEconomic Review1999,(89):1028-1043.
    [7] Hamilton, J. D. A neoclassical model of unemployment and the business cycle[J]. Journal ofPolitical Economy,1988,(96):593-617.
    [8] Bohi, D. R. On the macroeconomic effects of energy price shocks [J]. Resources and Energy,1991,(13):145-162.
    [9] Webb I. R., Larson R.C.Period and phase of customer replenishment: a new approach to thestrategic inventory/routing problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1995,(85):132-148.
    [10] Lee, K., Ni S., Ratti, R. A. oi1shocks and the macroeconomy: the role of Price variability[J]. The Energy Journal,1995,(16):39-56.
    [11]李继尊.中国能源预警模型研究[D].中国石油大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [12]毕大川,刘树成.经济周期和预警系统[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.
    [13]顾海兵.经济预警新论[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1994,(1):33-37.
    [14]陶骏昌.农业预警系统与农业宏观调控[J],经济研究,1995,(4):71-73.
    [15]佘丛国,席酉民.我国企业预警研究理论综述[J].预测,2003,(2):23-29.
    [16] Baird T. Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking[J]. Academy of ManagementReview,1985,10(2):230-243.
    [17] Basak S, Shapiro A. Value-at-Risk-based risk management:optimal policies and assetprices[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2001,(2):371-409.
    [18] Bromiley C. Individual differences in risk taking[J]. Risk-Taking Behavior,1992,11(1):87-132.
    [19] Norman R. Augustine,Anurag Sharma,N. Craig Smith,et al. Crisis management[M].Harvard: Business Review,1995
    [20] Heath. R. Crisis management for managers and executives: business crises-the definitivehandbook to reduction, readiness, response and recovery[M]. Financial Times Management,1998.
    [21] R.Hasumoto, A. Miyamoto, M. Sueta. Disaster prevention technology for crisismanagement on water and sewage treatment[J]. Fuji Electric Journal,1998,71(6).
    [22]佘廉.经济组织逆境管理[M].辽宁:辽宁人民出版社,1993.
    [23]谢科范,袁明鹏,彭华涛.企业风险管理[M].湖北:武汉理工大学出版社,2004.
    [24]胡华夏,罗险峰.现代企业生存风险预警指标体系的理论探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000,21(6):33一34.
    [25]罗帆,佘廉,顾必冲.民航交通灾害预警管理系统框架探讨[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2001,14(4):33-36.
    [26]王超.交通灾害中的载运工具致灾机理及其预警管理系统研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [27]高风彦,韩玉.铁路交通灾害预警管理模式的探讨[J].河北科技大学学报,2002,23(1):89-92.
    [28]罗云,宫运华,宫宝霖,等.安全风险预警技术研究[J].安全,2005,(2):26-29.
    [29]邱丕群.高校投入产出分析与预警系统[J].研究统计与信息论坛,1998,(3):15-19.
    [30]景国勋,杨玉中.矿山重大危险源辨识、评价及预警技术[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2008.
    [31] P.J Fotzpatrick,A comparison of ratios of successful industrial enterprises with those offailed firm[J].Certifed Public Accountant,1932.
    [32] Altman,E.T.R.Haldman,P.Narayanan. ZETA analysis a new model to identify bankruptcyrisk of corporations[J],Journal of Banking and Finance.1977,(1):29-54.
    [33] Aziz, Emanuel, Lawom. Bank prediction:an investigation of cash flow based models[J].Journal of Management Studies,1988,25(5):419-437.
    [34]高惠璇.应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
    [35]王超,宋大钊,杜学胜,等.煤与瓦斯突出预测的距离判别分析法及应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2009,26(4):470-474.
    [36]周健,史秀志,王怀勇.矿井突水水源识别的距离判别分析模型[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(2):278-282.
    [37]朱卓慧,赵伏军,叶洲元.基于距离判别分析法的冲击地压预测研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3):41-45.
    [38]刘年平,王宏图,袁志刚,刘竟成.砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J].岩土力学,2012,33(2):554-557.
    [39]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.
    [40] Yaon Y,Swles C T.A comparison of discriminate analysis versus artificial neuralnetworks[J].Journal of Peratia Research Society,1993,44:51-60.
    [41] Altmar E.I.,G.Marco,F.Varetto.Corporate distress diagnosis: Comparisons using lineardiscriminant analysis and neural networks[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,1994,(18):505–529.
    [42] Vapnik V N. Statistical Learning Theory[M]. New York:John and Wiley,1998.
    [43] Sanchez,V.D.A. Advanced support vector machines and kernel method[J].Neurocomputing,2003,(55):5-20.
    [44] Forrester J. W. lessons from system dynamics[J].system Dynamics review,1987,3(2):136-149.
    [45]王其藩.系统动力学(第二版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994.
    [46]黄光球,陆秋琴,云庆夏.建立矿山重大决策动态预警系统的方法[J].化工矿山技术,1995,24(5):19-23.
    [47]王慧敏,陈宝书.煤炭行业预警指标体系的基本框架结构[J].中国煤炭经济学院学报,1996,(4):10-13.
    [48]牛强,周勇,王志晓,夏士雄.基于自组织神经网络的煤矿安全预警系统[J].计算机工程与设计,2006,27(10):1752-1753.
    [49]李春民,王云海,张兴凯.矿山安全监测预警与综合管理信息系统[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007,26(5):655-657.
    [50]邵长安,李贺,关欣.煤矿安全预警系统的构建研究[J].煤炭技术,2007,26(5):63-65.
    [51]刘小生,薛萍.基于神经网络的矿山安全预警专家系统[J].煤矿安全,2008,(12):110-112.
    [52]杨玉中,冯长根,吴立云.基于可拓理论的煤矿安全预警模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(1):40-45.
    [53]何国家,刘双勇,孙彦彬.煤矿事故隐患监控预警的理论与实践[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(2):212-217.
    [54]张治斌,姜亚南,郭政慧.关联规则挖掘技术在煤矿安全预警系统中的应用研究[J].工矿自动化,2009,(9):24-26.
    [55]郑晶.矿山安全预警信息系统的研究[J].长春工程学院学报(自然科学版),2011,12(1):121-123.
    [56]戴汝为.关于“复杂性”的研究—一门21世纪的科学.科学前沿与未来[M].北京:科学出版社,1998,182-207.
    [57] Cowan C A. Conference Opening Remarks.In: Pines A,Meltzer D,et al eds. Complexity,Metophors, Models and Reality.New York:Addi-sion-Wesley,1994.1-4.
    [58]约翰.霍根.科学的终结[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1997.
    [59]吴彤.复杂性概念研究及其意义[J].中国人民大学学报,2004,(5):2-9.
    [60] N.Rescher. Complexity: A philosophical overview [M]. New Brunswick and London:Transaction Publishers,1998.
    [61]中国科学院《复杂性研究》编委会.复杂性研究[C].北京:科学出版社,1993.
    [62]许国志,顾基发,车宏安.系统科学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000.297-299.
    [63]苗东升.复杂性研究的成就与困惑[J].系统科学学报,2009,17(1):1-5.
    [64]苗东升.钱学森复杂性研究述评[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004.24(04):67-71.
    [65]黄欣荣.复杂性科学方法论:内涵、现状和意义[J].河北师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008,31(4):81-85.
    [66]苗东升.复杂性研究的现状与展望[J].系统辩证学学报,2001,9(4):3-8.
    [67]苗东升.论涌现[J].河池学院学报,2008,28(1):6-12.
    [68]盖尔曼.夸克与美洲豹[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1999,119-200.
    [69]顾基发.系统科学方法论与社会的进步[J].科学对社会的影响,2009,(2):4-8.
    [70] CheckLand P B.Systems Thinking,Systems Practice[M].Chichester:John Wiley&Sons,1981.
    [71]钱学森.创建系统学[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,2001.
    [72]钱学森、于景元、戴汝为.一个科学的新领域—开放复杂巨系统及其方法论[J].自然杂志,1990,13(1):3-10.
    [73]钱学森.钱学森书信(第5卷)[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2005.
    [74]王崧.耗散结构论的理论价值及方法论意义探析[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2006,8(6):72-74.
    [75]冯志华,何学秋.复杂性理论在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤矿安全,2006,(7):61-64.
    [76]宋学峰.复杂性、复杂系统与复杂性科学[J].中国科学基金.2003,(5):262-269.
    [77] Bak,P,Tang,C.Wiesenfeld,K.Self-organized criticality: An explanation of1/f noise[J].Phys.Rev. Lett,1987,59(4):381-384.
    [78] Bak P,Tang C,Wiesenfeld K.Self-organized Criticality[J].Phys.Rev.A,1988,38(1):364-374.
    [79] Bak P.How Nature Works:The Science of Self-organized Criticality[M]. New York:Copernocus Press for Springer-Verlag,1996.
    [80]吴忠良.自组织临界性与地震预测:对目前地震预测问题争论的评述[J].中国地震,1998,14(4):9-10.
    [81]程洁,李忠仁.针灸治未病的古代文献研究[J].江西中医学院院报,2002,14(3):49-51.
    [82]杨永杰,龚树全.皇帝内径[M].北京:线装书局,2009.
    [83]何平.系统非优分析理论及方法[J].中国工程科学,2003,5(7):40-46.
    [84]齐立广.风险社会中政府责任担当的问题研究[D].苏州大学,2010.
    [85] Frank H. Knight. Risks, Uncertainties and Profits[M]. Press of Peoples University of China,2005.
    [86]顾镜清等.风险管理理论与实务[M].北京:中国国际广播出版社,1993.
    [87] Weicheng Cui,D.I.Blockley.On the bound for Structural system reliability[J], StructuralSafety.1991,(9):247-259.
    [88]国家安全生产监督管理总局安全生产协调司.现代安全理念和创新实践[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
    [89]郑人权.预测学原理[M].北京:中国统计学出版社,1988.
    [90]陈国阶.对环境预警的探讨[J].重庆环境科学,1996,18(5):1-4.
    [91]隋鹏程,陈宝智,隋旭.安全原理[M].北京:化学工业出版社.2005.
    [92]王金波,陈宝智.系统安全工程[M].沈阳:东北工学院出版社,1992.
    [93]何学秋,林柏泉,田水承,等.安全工程学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.
    [94]赵宏展,徐向东.危险源的概念辨析[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):65-70.
    [95]钱新明,陈宝智.事故致因的突变模型[J].中国安全科学学报,1995(02):2-4.
    [96]田水承,李红霞,王莉,等.从三类危险源理论看煤矿事故的频发[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(1):10-15.
    [97]张珞平,陈伟琪,洪华生.预警原则在环境规划与管理中的应用[J].厦门大学学报,2004,43(8):221-224.
    [98] Raffensperger C,Tickner J.Protecting Public Health and the Environment:Implementing thePrecautionary Prin-ciple[M].Washington D C:Island Press,1999.
    [99]孙荣霞.基于霍尔三维结构的公共基础设施PPP项目融资模式的风险研究[J].经济经纬,2010,6:141-146
    [100]陈红,祁慧,谭慧.中国煤矿重大瓦斯爆炸事故规律分析[J].中国矿业,2005,14(3):64-69.
    [101]唐江桥.中国畜产品价格预测预警研究[D].福建农业大学博士学位论文,2011.
    [102]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006.
    [103]陈良琼,张宗领,影响房地产评估价格的特征因素及量化[J].山西建筑,2011,37(6):207-208.
    [104]李远远.基于粗糙集的指标体系构建及综合评价方法研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位,2009.
    [105]许满贵,煤矿动态综合安全评价模式及应用研究[D],西安科技大学博士学位论文,2006.
    [106]赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用[J].大自然探索,1994,13(47):67-72.
    [107] Pawlak Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Information and Computer Science,1982:(11):341-356.
    [108] Claude E. Shannon,Warren Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication[M].University of Illinois Press,1963.
    [109]庞素琳,巩吉璋.C5.0分类算法及在银行个人信用评级中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(12):94-104.
    [110]肖红飞,何学秋,刘黎明.改进BP算法在煤与瓦斯突出预测中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(9):59-62.
    [111]钟嘉鸣,李订芳.粗糙集与层次分析法集成的综合评价模型[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2008,41(4):126-130.
    [112]张士昌.矿山事故隐患预控管理模式[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2009.
    [113]张洪杰.煤矿安全风险综合评价体系及应用研究[D].中国矿业大学博士学位论文,2010.
    [114]朱川曲.放顶煤综采工作面人-机-环境系统可靠性[J].中南工学院学报,1999,13(2):102-108.
    [115]宋学峰,李新春,曹庆仁,等,煤矿重大瓦斯事故风险预控管理理论与方法[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2010.
    [116]刘小生,孙群.矿山安全预警专家系统知识库的研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2008,35(3):34-36.
    [117]李乾鹏,方家骐.基于RBR和CBR规划中的知识表示方法研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2009,30(22):5166-5170.
    [118]金聪,戴上平,郭京蕾,等.人工智能教程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007,41-44.
    [119]鲍军鹏,张选平.人工智能导论[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2010,39-43.
    [120] Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber.范明,等,译.数据挖掘:概念与技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001.
    [121] Muhammad A.Razi,Kuriakose Athappilly. A comparative predictive analysis of neuralnetworks, nonlinear regression and classification and regression tree models [J].ExpertSystems with Appocatons,2005,(29):65-74.
    [122] Quinlan J R. Induction of decision trees[J].Machine Learning,1986(4):81-106.
    [123] Quinlan J R. C4.5: Programs for machine learning [J]. Morgan Kaufman,1993:81-106.
    [124] Pang-Ning Tan,Michael Steinbach,Vipin Kumar.数据挖掘导论[M].范明,等,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2006,96-101.
    [125]袁爱香, C4.5数据挖掘算法的改进及其应用[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,39(3):461-464.
    [126] Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R A,et al. Classification and regression trees[M].Belmont:Wadsworth,1984.
    [127] Quinlan J R. Bagging, boosting, andC4.5[C].Proceedings of the National Conference onArtificial Intelligence. Portland,Oregon,1996,(1):725-730.
    [128] Enric Plaza, Lorraine, Mcginty. Distributed case-based reasoning [J] The KnowledgeEngineering Review,2006,20(3):261–265.
    [129] Aamodt A.Plaza E. Case-based Reasoning: Foundational issues, Methodological Variationsand system approaches [J].AI communications,1994,7(1):39-59
    [130] Rainer S, Lothar G. Case based reasoning for antibiotics therapy advice: an investigation ofretrieval algorithms and prototypes [J]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine,2001,23(2):171-186.
    [131] Shin K S, Han I G. Case-based reasoning supported by genetic algorithms for corporatebond rating [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,1999,16(2):85-95.
    [132] Cheng Minyuan,Tsai Hsingchih, Chiu Yihsiang. Fuzzy case-based reasoning for copingwith construction disputes [J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(2):4106-4113.
    [133]赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2000.
    [134]叶义成,柯丽华.黄德育系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006.
    [135]田水承,王莉,李红霞.基于SPA模型的煤矿瓦斯危险源风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(6):103-106.
    [136]张志镇,高峰,许爱斌,等.冲击地压危险性的集对分析评价模型[J].中国矿业大学学报,2011,40(3):379-384.
    [137]李凡修,梅平.多元联系数模型在煤矿安全评价中的应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2011,28(1):163-166.
    [138] Arnold V. Catastrophe Theory [M]. Berlin: Spinger Verlag,1984.
    [139] Saunders P T. An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory [M].London: Cambridge UniversityPress,1980,196-211.
    [140]金鸿章,郭健,韦琦.基于尖点突变模型对复杂系统脆性问题的研究[J].舰船电子工程,2004,24(2):1-3.
    [141]程乾生.属性识别理论模型及其应用[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,1997,33(1):12-20.
    [142]陈守煜,王子茹.基于对立统一与质量互变定理的水资源系统可变模糊评价新方法[J].水利学报,2011,42(3).253-261.
    [143]郭德勇,郑茂杰,郭超,等.煤与瓦斯突出预测可拓聚类方法及应用[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(6):783-787.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700