用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中风病虚实证候演变及脑电特征与预后的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     研究中风病虚实证候演变及脑电特征与预后的关系,探讨中风病不同证候特征对疾病的影响及在预后判断中的作用,提高对中风病证候的认识,提高辨证施治的准确性。方法:
     本研究分为两部分,第一部分以气虚证、痰热证作为中风病虚实证候的代表,探讨中风病虚实证候演变与预后的关系。第二部分以脑对称指数(Revised Brain Symmetry Index, r-BSI)作为脑电特征的代表性指标,研究其在中风病预后判断中的作用,并初步探索中风病虚实证候与r-BSI的关系。
     第一部分:中风病虚实证候演变与预后的关系研究
     第一章:从数据库中提取706例发病3天内、发病第7、14、28、90天均进行了《缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表》、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale, NIHSS)及日常生活活动能力量表(Barthel Index, BI)评分的中风患者临床信息。依据发病72h内是否存在气虚证将中风患者分为气虚证组(330例)和非气虚证组(376例),应用不等距重复测量方差分析比较两组间不同时点NIHSS评分;同时,从数据库中提取发病72小时内判断为痰热证的中风患者294例,依据疾病过程中痰热证是否持续存在将患者分为痰热证持续存在组和痰热证消失组,应用不等距重复测量方差分析比较两组间不同时点NIHSS评分;以发病第90天BI为因变量,BI≥95者427例(60%),为预后良好,BI<95分者279例(40%),为预后不良,以中风病入院时NIHSS评分、各时点证候要素为自变量,应用Logistic回归分析研究中风病不同时点各证候要素与远期预后的关系。
     第二章:从数据库中提取234例缺血性中风患者,以各时点证候要素、入院时NIHSS评分、既往病史、发病年龄及性别为自变量,发病第21天BI为因变量,进一步探讨中风病虚实证候在近期预后判断中的作用。
     第二部分:中风病急性期脑电特征指标脑对称指数与预后的关系研究
     对29例发病72小时内入院的缺血性中风患者进行《缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表》、NIHSS、BI、改良Rankin量表(mRS)的多时点动态评价,同时在发病72小时内进行脑电监测。参考国外研究中关于r-BSI的计算方法,获得脑电特征指标r-BSI,应用方差分析比较正常人与中风患者、中风患者不同脑电分级间的r-BSI大小;并以中风病患者发病第21、90天的临床结局为因变量(BI>60或BI≤60; mRS<3或mRS≥3),各时点证候要素、入院时NIHSS评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(glasgow coma scale, GCS)为自变量,应用线性回归及决策树等方法探讨中风病急性期脑电特征指标与预后的关系;计算成对脑对称指数pairwise derived Brain Symmetry Index(pdBSI),应用折线变化图观察同一患者不同导联及不同患者同一导联的pdBSI变化趋势,观察其在病情判断、病灶定位中的应用;基于以上研究,进一步探索中风病虚实证候与脑电特征指标r-BSI的相关性。
     结果:
     第一部分:
     第一章:重复测量方差分析结果显示,发病72h内存在气虚证的中风患者其NIHSS评分各时点均高于非气虚证者(P<0.01),气虚证组与非气虚证组内各时点问NIHSS评分均有差异(P<0.01和P<0.05),表现为随着时间的后延,NIHSS评分逐渐降低;痰热证与神经功能缺损程度及预后存在一定的相关性,与痰热证消失的中风患者相比,痰热证持续存在者神经功能缺损程度较重(P=0.000<0.01),随时间的延后,NIHSS评分逐渐降低,各时点均有差异(P=0.000<0.01);进一步筛选与中风病预后相关的证候要素,发现中风病发病第7、14天气虚证的存在是预测发病90天预后不良的独立危险因素,发病第7、14天B值分别为:-0.524和-0.493,即中风病急性期存在气虚证的患者,发病90天BI较低,预后较差。
     第二章:在充分考虑入院时NIHSS评分、既往病史及年龄等预后影响因素的情况下,发病第7、10天内风证、发病第10天气虚证与发病第21天BI密切相关,相关系数分别为-0.905、-1.425和-0.895,即中风病急性期发病第7天存在内风证、第10天存在内风证、气虚证的患者,其近期预后较差。
     第二部分:
     与健康人(0.060)比较,中风患者r-BSI值较高(0.107),二者具有明显统计学差异(P=0.000<0.001);r-BSI大小与基于临床医师判断的脑电图分级相一致,判断为重度异常脑电图的患者其r-BSI值(0.1084)较轻度异常者(0.1035)高,具有统计学差异(P=0.011);比较不同临床结局中风患者r-BSI,r-BSI越高,预后越差;应用线性回归方程进一步探讨r-BSI与预后的关系,发现发病72小时内r-BSI、NIHSS与入院第21天BI.mRS及第90天mRS密切相关,是预测其预后的独立危险因素,决策树分析显示发病72小时内r-BSI>0.111,6分     结论:
     1.准确把握证候的动态时空性,益于研究疾病传变、转化与转归的规律提示诊治思维过程中要树立恒动观念。
     2.中风病虚实证候演变与预后关系密切。中风病急性期存在气虚证的患者神经功能缺损程度较重,气虚证的存在与预后不良关系密切,中风病急性期应积极采取扶助正气治疗。中风病过程中痰热证的变化与预后关系密切,痰热证持续存在,则神经功能缺损程度较重。提示中风病的治疗应注重早期扶助正气,同时积极清热化痰,正确处理正虚邪实的关系,祛邪而不伤正,调整机体达到阴平阳密的状态。
     3.脑电特征指标r-BSI对中风病预后判断具有一定作用,可协助临床医生更加准确的判断患者预后,提高临床疗效,中风病急性期r-BSI越高,预后越差。pdBSI在中风病病灶定位中具有一定参考意义,病灶部位对应导联此值较高,随着脑电频率的增加,pdBSI敏感性逐渐降低。
     4.中风病急性期气虚证与脑电r-BSI之间有一定相关性,存在气虚证的患者r-BSI较高,为气虚证在中风病预后判断中的作用提供了一定的客观指标支持。
     创新点:
     1.重复测量方差分析方法的应用前提即对同一研究对象的某个测量指标在不同时点的多次重复测量结果,且不同时点数据间存在一定的自相关性。本研究将重复测量方差分析方法应用于中风病证候研究中,探讨了中风病证候对疾病的影响,该方法既能充分考虑某一证候在不同时点的自相关性,又能体现中风病证候多时点的动态变化特征。
     2.本研究根据中风病虚实证候的证候特征不同,从中风病急性期气虚证的有无及中风病过程中痰热证消失与否对疾病的预后影响方面进行了探讨,对中风病证候特征有了更深入的认识,对临床实践具有一定的指导意义。
     3.将脑电特征指标r-BSI作为评价大脑内在功能状态的客观指标,探讨了r-BSI在中风病预后判断中的作用,并比较了气虚证与非气虚证r-BSI值大小,初步探索了中风病证候与脑电特征之间的关系。
Objective:
     Explore the correlations among stroke syndrome, electroencephalogram (EEG) and prognosis of stroke patients, and study on the effect of syndrome and EEG on stroke patients'prognosis. Enhance the cognition of stroke syndrome and improve the accuracy of therapy due to syndrome differentiation.
     Method:
     The research was divided into two parts, the first part is about the correlation between deficiency-excess syndrome evolution and prognosis in stroke patients, selecting the qi deficiency syndrome (QDS) and phlegm-heat syndrome as representation. The second part is about the effect of EEG on stroke prognosis, selecting the (Revised Brain Symmetry Index, r-BSI) as representation, and preliminarily exploring the correlation between deficiency-excess syndrome and r-BSI.
     Part1:Study on the correlation between deficiency-excess syndrome evolution and prognosis of stroke.
     Chapter1:Recruited were706stroke patients with complete clinical information including diagnostic scale scoring of elements such as wind, fire, phlegm, blood stasis, qi deficiency, and yin deficiency, scoring of The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within72h from attack, on the7th,14th,28th, and90th day after attack, and Barthel index (BI) scoring on the90th day. They were assigned to the qi deficiency syndrome (QDS) group (330cases) and the non-QDS group (376cases). The NIHSS scores at different time points were compared between the two groups using analysis of variance of repeated measure data. Then294phlegm-heat syndrome were extracted from data base, Then the effect of phlegm-heat syndrome on neurological deficit degree of stroke were explored with application of Repeated Measures analysis of variance. On the90th day of attack,427patients with BI≥95(accounting for60%) had favorable prognosis, while279with BI<95(accounting for40%) had unfavorable prognosis. The correlation between each syndrome element and the long-term prognosis of stroke patients was studied by using Logistic regression analysis.
     Chapter2:234ischemic stroke patients were extracted from database, each syndrome element, NIHSS at admission, medical history, age and gender as the dependent variable, and BI as the independent variable, effect of deficiency-excess syndrome on short-term prognosis were also explored.
     Part2:Study on the correlation between EEG feature-r-BSI and prognosis of stroke patients.
     Twenty-nine patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and persistent neurological deficits at EEG recording were incrementally included. Two a posteriori groups were arbitrarily created based on patient outcomes and evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and BI on21or90days (BI>60or BI≤60and mRS<3or mRS≥3). Student's T-tests were used to compare the differences of the r-BSI between normal subjects and stroke patients, differences between patients with different EEG scale and patients with different outcomes. In addition, we explored the correlation of EEG and prognosis of stoke patients with application of liner regression and Decision Tree. Based on the above research, we further explored the correlation between syndrome and EEG.
     Results:
     Part1:Chapter1:The results of Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that, Higher NIHSS score was found in patients of QDS than those of non-QDS at each time point (P<0.01). Statistical difference existed in NIHSS score between the two groups at each time point (P<0.01, P<0.05). Stroke patients with phlegm-heat syndrome have higher NIHSS score than patients without the syndrome (P=0.000<0.01), and there appears a decreased NIHSS score with time points delay(P=0.000<0.01). QDS on the7th and14th day were independed risk factor of90th-day BI, and were negatively correlated with the B value being-0.524and-0.493respectively, QDS in acute ischemic stroke means a lower90th-day BI, and an unfavorable prognosis.
     Chapter2:The results of Logistic regression showed that, the wind on the7th day, the wind and QDS on the10th day were independed risk factor of21th-day BI, and were negatively correlated with the B value being-0.905、-1.425and-0.895respectively, The wind and QDS in acute ischemic stroke means an unfavorable prognosis.
     Part2:Compared with healthy controls(0.060), the r-BSI of stroke patients is0.0107, there is a significant statistical difference(P=0.000<0.01).The size of r-BSI is consistent with EEG classification, higher EEG classification with higher r-BSI. Student's T-tests and liner regression implied that r-BSI at admission was correlated with mRS and BI at both21d and90d. There is also difference in r-BSI between patients with QDS and patients with non-QDS (P=0.04).
     Conclusion:
     1. Accurately grasping the characteristics of symptoms dynamic time and space is benifit to study the change, transformation and outcome of disease. There should be constant dynamic consept should be established in diagnosis and treatment of disease.
     2. There are close relationship between syndrome change and prognosis. Stroke patients of QDS had more severe neurological impairment degree than those of non-QDS, QDS of acute-stage was closely correlated with unfavorable prognosis, early actively invigorating healthy qi is essesial in acute-stage. Phlegm-heat syndrome in patients who have suffered stroke has an effect on the degree of neurological deficiency, disappearance of phlegm-heat syndrome may improve the degree of neurological deficit observed in stroke patients. Early invigorating healthy qi and removing the phlegm-heat, and correctly handling the correlation between deficiency-excess, to ajust the body into a normal state.
     3. It is significant of EEG feature for predicting the prognosis of stroke patients. A higher r-BSI predicts a poorer short-term prognosis for stroke patients. Acute EEG monitoring may be of prognostic value for patients'outcomes.
     4. There are some correlation between syndrome and EEG. There is also difference in r-BSI between patients with QDS and patients with non-QDS (P=0.04).The research provided some data support for the importance of QDS in prognosis predicting of stroke patients.
     Highlight of innovation:
     1. This study brought new ideas for the use of repeated measures analysis of variance,. It is the repeated measurements at different points of a measure of the same object. There is self-correlation between the point data. We applied the method in syndrome study of stroke patients.
     2. According to the characteristics of Stroke Symptom, we explored the correlation of syndrome and prognosis. Higher NIHSS score was found in patients of QDS than those of non-QDS at each time point. Stroke patients with phlegm-heat syndrome have higher NIHSS score than patients without the syndrome.
     3. We used the EEG feature to predict the prognosis of stroke patients and explored the correlation between syndrome and EEG.
引文
[1]中华全国中医学会内科分会.《中风病中医证候诊断与疗效评定标准》[S].中国医药学报,1986,1(2):56.
    [2]孟家眉,梁宝华,张树懿.脑血管病临床辨证规范化定量化初探[S].中西医结合杂志,1988,8(3):173.
    [3]王顺道,高颖.中风病辨证诊断标准(试行)[S].北京中医药大学学报1994,17(3):64-66.
    [4]中华人民共和国中医药行业标准.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].国家中医药管理局,1994:24-25.
    [5]高颖,马斌,刘强,等.缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表编制及方法学探讨.中医杂志.2011,52(24):2097-2101.
    [6]中华人民共和国中医药行业标准.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].国家中医药管理局,1994:24-25.
    [7]梁宝华,孟家眉.脑血管病临床辨证规范化定量化的进一步研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,1997,20(20):47.
    [8]郭蓉娟,杨云龙,吴燕,等.中风病风火上扰清窍证的证候规范初探[J].北京中医药大学学报,1997,20(4):60.
    [9]王玉来.中风急症证候分析[J].中国中医急症,1995,4(2):75.
    [10]“中风病证候学与临床诊断的研究”科研协作组.“中风病证候诊断标准’的临床验证研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,1994,17(6):41.
    [11]林建雄,冯哗,陈建霖,等.中风病急性期中医证候分布分析[J].北京中医药大学学报,2004,27(4):83-85.
    [12]张聪,高颖.《中风病辨证诊断标准》应用现状存在问题及对策[J].天津中医药,2007,24(1):12-14.
    [13]孙晓伟,王阶.证候动态变化规律研究.山东中医药大学学报.2010,34(2):104-105.
    [14]王顺道,司志国,黄宜光,等.中风病证候的初步研究[J].中国中医急症,1995,4(2):85-88.
    [15]王顺道,杜梦华,解庆凡,等.中风病急性期证候演变规律的研究[J].中国中医急症,1996,5(3):121-124.
    [16]王建华,王永炎.出血性中风、缺血性中风急性期证候演变规律的研究.[J].中国中医急症,2001,10(4):21 5-217.
    [17]谢颖桢,邹忆怀,马洪明,等.中风病急性期中经络和中脏腑证候要素的动态比较.中国中医基础医学杂志.2006,12(10):746-748.
    [18]邹蔚萌,崔方圆,龙子弋,等.基于数据挖掘的缺血性中风火热证变化特征分析.辽宁中医杂志.2011,38(6):1042-1044.
    [19]耿晓娟,张军平,高颖.缺血性中风病急性期证候变化规律研究.中华中医药杂志.2010,25(9):1485-1487.
    [20]游建明,张志高,刘成,等.缺血性中风证候演变规律初探及川芎嗪联合中药复方疗效观察.中华中医药学刊.2010,28(12):2666-2669.
    [21]徐俊峰,李保洋,高颖,等.缺血性中风病证候演变模式的研究.天津中医药.2009,26(6):511-514.
    [22]傅勤慧,裴建,惠建荣.等.中风证候动态研究现状与展望:数据与模型驱动模式的应用.中西医结合学报.2011,9(12):1292-1301.
    [23]王忠,张伯礼,申春娣,等.中风病发病病机演变的动态研究[J].天津中医,2002,19(2):8-13.
    [24]杨利,黄燕,蔡业峰,等.1418例中风患者痰瘀证候分布和演变规律探析[J].辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(6):459-460.
    [25]马斌,高颖.中风病发病第7天和第14天证候要素演变规律初步研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(12):1561-1563.
    [26]张华,高颖.缺血性中风证候演变与神经功能缺损的相关性研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2007,30(4):274-277.
    [27]刘强,高颖.中风病不同阶段四诊信息的指标聚类分析[J].中华中医药杂志,2007,22(3):162-164.
    [28]郭蕾,王永炎,张志斌.证候概念的诠释[J].北京中医药大学学报,2003,26(2):5-8.
    [29]郑肇良,符月琴.脑出血急性期血液流变学与中医辨证相关性分析.《湖南医学》,2010,21(11):103-104.
    [30]江涛,刘金民,尹岭,等.中风后遗症患者主要证型及血液动力学研究[J].2008,26(3):630-631.
    [31]侯键,中风先兆证的头颅CT影像及其与血液流变学关系研究.中国中西医结合影像学杂志.2004,2(2):81-84.
    [32]李存洲,朱贵详,崔峰.大剂量清开灵联合甘露醇治疗脑出血急性期100例观察.中医药临床杂志,2004,16(1):49-50.
    [33]许光,陈俊抛,洗煜.醒脑静注射液对急性缺血性脑卒中神经保护作用的临床观察.岭南急诊医学杂志.2008,13(6):456-457.
    [34]李淑云.急性脑梗死中医证型与血尿酸水平关系的研究.现代中西医结合杂志.2004,13(14):1831-1832.
    [35]李创鹏,谌剑飞.缺血性中风风证与血管内皮素、胰岛素及相关性睡眠障碍的关系探讨.中西医结合心脑血管病杂志.2009,7(12):1421-1422.
    [36]关少侠,谌剑飞,马雅玲.急性缺血性中风始发状态风证与血浆内皮素的关系研究.中国中西医结合急救杂志.2001,8(1):41-42.
    [37]孙文军,田金洲,时晶.C反应蛋白与急性缺血性脑卒中血瘀证的相关性研究[J].北京中医药,2008,27(5):328-320.
    [38]孙景波,石延榜,黄培新.中风病急性期阳类证与血浆胆囊收缩素的相关性研究[J].河南中医,2006,26(8):28-29.
    [39]梁晖,陈少芳.出血性中风中经络血清sICAM21、MDA变化的临床研究[J].福建中医学院学报,2005,15(6):3-5.
    [40]祝美珍,李志刚.缺血性中风中医辨证分型与ICAM21和CD62P表达水平的相关性[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(3):225-227.
    [41]刘泰,吕晶.急性出血性脑血管病中医辨证分型与血浆胃动素水平观察[J].中华实用中西医杂志,2003,3(16):1059-1060.
    [42]朱亨,王新高,林求诚,等.血清碱性蛋白与脑出血中医证型的临床研究[J].中国医药学报,2002,17(11):678-679.
    [43]仓志兰,姜亚军.机型脑梗死中医辨证分型与IL-6的关系探讨.江西中医药.2006,27(9):27-28.
    [44]赵佳,吴爱明,张奸,等.中风病高敏C反应蛋白变化与中医证候的相关性研究.北京中医药大学学报.2009,16(2):13-16.
    [45]张妍,赵佳,任毅,等.中风病急性期甲状腺激素变化与中医证候的相关性研究.北京中医药大学学报.2008,15(3):1-4.
    [46]姚毅,徐小吴,吴洪涛.中风病各证型与脑CT表现分析.中国中医急症.2006,15(7):750-753.
    [47]李立波.中风辨证分型与影像学诊断的相关性分析,2008,28(9):640-641.
    [48]张永全,邢军,张惠玉,等.急性脑梗塞的中医辨证分型与头颅CT、MRI的研究.贵阳中医学院学报.2011,33(5):45-49.
    [49]王顺道,任占利,杜梦华.中风病始发态证候与脑病理改变相关关系的研究[J].中国中医急症1999,8(1):36-39.
    [50]扎娃,高芳,张娜.脑梗死急性期大小动脉病变证候要素比较研究.北京中医药大学学报.2010,17(3):1-4.
    [51]凌玲.245例脑卒中急性期中医证候关系研究分析[J].陕西中医,2002,23(8):693-694.
    [52]侯键,余朝骏,李明富.中风病急性期病灶CT定量规律研究[J].中国中西医结合影像学志,2006(6):165-169.
    [53]吕莉君,刘忠达,姚纯俭,等.中风病急性期证型分析研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志2005,12(1):12-13.
    [54]渠慧芳.颅脑CT表现与辨证分型的关系研究进展.山东中医药大学学报.2010,34(2):190-191.
    [55]黄海亮.中风病急性期证型与CT扫描分析相关性研究.中医药学刊.2004,22(10):1892-1893.
    [56]李燕钰,詹乐昌,蔡业峰,等.急性缺血性脑卒中OCSP分型与中医辨证分型 关系的回顾性分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2004,13(23):3179-3180.
    [57]杨玉洁,张洁.脑梗塞患者TCD特征与中医辨证关系探讨[J].吉林中医药,1997,17(6):13.
    [58]朱彦玫.中风病急性期中医辨证分型与经颅多普勒的相关性.河南中医.2009,29(8):764-765.
    [59]李侠,于霞,王建文.中风病TCD诊断与中医辨证分型的关系的探讨.中华中医药学刊.2010,28(8):1732-1734.
    [60]黄玉贞,黄洁新,刘祥厦.中风病中经络中医证型与脑血流动力学改变的相关性研究[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(13):1524-1525.
    [61]张伯礼,宋其云,崔秀琼,等.天津地区中医中风病危险因素及证候调查研究[J].天津中医,2000,17(1):35.
    [62]谌剑飞,关少侠,丁萍.中风急症证候研究与问题探讨[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2001,(3):169-171.
    [63]辛喜艳,张华,高颖.缺血性中风急性期痰热证的证候演变特点及其与神经功能缺损程度的关系.辽宁中医杂志.2010,37(9):1644-1646.
    [64]毛慧娜,任占利,刘金民,等.非线性映射和聚类分析方法在中风病证候分类中的应用[J].生物数学学报,1996,11(3):94-97.
    [65]潘峰,叶晓勤,郭建文.急性缺血中风阴阳类证证候分级阈值初探[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007,5(7):95-97.
    [66]霍清萍,孔林,李金菩.300例缺血性脑血管病中医证候的多元统计研究[J].上海中医药大学学报,2008,22(6):31-34.
    [67]田文敬.中医特色研究应借助现代数据挖掘技术[J].中医研究,2005,18(8):7.
    [68]徐俊峰.缺血性中风证候组合规律及方证相应的初步研究[D].北京:北京中医药大学,2006:53.
    [69]白小欣,蔡业峰,詹乐昌.“3 W1H急性中风证候四诊信息采集子系统”的设计与应用[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(7):593-395.
    [70]文龙龙,许越,招远祺.急性缺血中风四诊信息采集规范化研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2008,14(15):8-11.
    [71]张华.中风病中脏腑早期症状及脑电监测与近期预后的研究[D].北京:北京中医药大学,2009.
    [72]钟海珍,马斌,高颖.缺血性中风患者发病3个月致残因素初探.中国中医基础医学杂志.2010,16(1):47-51.
    [73]钟海珍,高颖.与发病3个月致残相关的缺血性中风急性期四诊信息的筛选.辽宁中医杂志.2009,36(5):708-117.
    [74]曹克刚,於堃,高颖.缺血性中风急性期预后相关因素的多因素分析.天津中医药.2007,24(6):462-464.
    [75]王平平,缺血性中风不同时点神经功能缺损程度、证候特征与预后相关性 的研究[D].北京:北京中医药大学,2011.
    [76]吴国健.怎样预测中风患者的预后.《求医问药》内科诊室.2007,8:13-14.
    [1]ZikovT,BibianS, DumontGA,et al. Awavelet based de. Noising technique for ocul81" artifact correction of the electronen cephalogram. Proc IEEEMBS 2002; 98.
    [2]GaoN, ZhuSA, HeB.Detecting human head oonductivity distilbution by means of an RSM-MREIT algorithm.Proceeding of the27th International Conference of the IEEE EMBS,2005,2641-2643.
    [3]Schreiber T.Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods.Phys Rep,1999,308(1):61-64.
    [4]Danial K, Leon G. Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics北京:世界图书出版公司,1997.
    [5]Wu DY. Cai G, Yuan Y, et al. Application of nonlinear dynamics analysis in assessing unconsciousness:A preliminary study.Clin Neurophysiol, 2011,122(3):490-498.
    [6]李娜,陈亚光.基于小波变换与自适应滤波的EEG信号的提取[J].基础及前沿研究,中国科技信息.2006,23:276-278.
    [7]金盟涛,邹俊忠,王行愚.一种新的基于小波变换的EEG视觉伪信号修正方法[J].华东理工大学学报.2006,32(11):1331-1336.
    [8]吴婷,颜国正,杨帮华.基于陷波器和小波变换去除自发脑电信号噪声的方法[J].《测控技术》.2007,26(4):29-31.
    [9]吴婷,颜国正,杨帮华.仪器仪表学报.基于小波包分解的脑电信号特征提取[J].2007,28(12):2231-2234.
    [10]Molnar M, Csuhaj R, Horvath S, et al. Spectral and complex features of the EEG changed by visual input in a case of subcortical stroke compared to healthy controls. Clin Neurophysiol.2006,117(4):771-780.
    [11]Molnar M, Csuhaj R, Horvath S, et al. Spectral EEG-characteristics of subcortical ischemic brain lesion--a case study.Ideggyogy Sz 2006,59(3-4):121-131.
    [12]Finnigan SP, Walsh M, Rose SE, et al.Quantitative EEG indices of sub-acute ischemic stroke correlate with clinical outcomes. Clin Neurophysiol,2007,118(11): 2525-2532.
    [13]Nagata K, Tagawa K, Hiroi S, et al. Electroencephalographic corre-lates of blood flow and oxygen metabolism provided by positron emission tomography in patients with cerebral infarction.Electro encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1989,72(1):16-30.
    [14]Sheorajpanday RV, Nagels G, Weeren AJ, et al. Additional value of quantitative EEG in acute anterior circulation syndrome of presumed ischemic origin.Clin Neuro-physiol,2010,121 (10):1719-1725.
    [15]Van Putten MJ, Peters JM, Mulder SM,et al. A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy Clin Neuro physiol 2004,115(5):1189-1194.
    [16]De Vos CC, van Maarseveen SM, Brouwers PJ,et al. Continuous EEG Monitoring During Thrombolysis in Acute Hemispheric Stroke Patients Using the Brain Symmetry Index.J Clin Neurophysiol,2008,25(2):77-82.
    [17]Van Putten MJ, Kind T, Visser F, et al.Detecting temporal lobe seizures from scalp EEG recordings:a comparison of various features. Clin Neurophysiol,2005,116(10):2480-2489.
    [18]Van Putten MJ.Extended BSI for continuous EEG monitoring in carotid endarte-rectomy. Clin Neurophysiol,2006,117(12):2661-2666.
    [19]Van Putten MJ.The revised brain symmetry index. Clilical Neuro-physiology, 2007,118(11):2362-2367.
    [20]Rishi V.A. Sheorajpanday, Guy Nagels, Arie J.T.M. Weeren, et al.Reproducibility and clinical relevance of quantitative EEG parameters in cerebral ischemia:A basic approach. Clinical Neurophysiology,2009, 120(5):845-855.
    [21]Finnigan SP, Rose SE, Walsh M, et al. Correlation of quantitative EEG in acute ischemic stroke with 30-days NIHSS score. Stroke,2004,35(4):899-903.
    [22]Molnar M, Csuhaj R, Horvath S, et al. Changes in EEG-complexity after subcortical ischemic brain damage. Ideggyogy Sz,2006,59(5-6):185-192.
    [23]Kraskov A. Synchronization and interdependence measures and their application to the electroencephalogram of epilepsy patients and clustering of data. NIC series,2004,24.
    [24]Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M, Kurths J, et al.Synchronization:a universal concept in nonlinear science.Am J Phys,2002,70(6):655.
    [25]Pereda E, Quiroga RQ, Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neuron-physiological signals. Prog Neurobiol,2005,77(1-2):1-37.
    [26]Sauseng P, Klimesch W. What does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes? Neurosci Biobehav R, 2008,32(5):1001-1013.
    [27]Young GB,McLachlan RS,Kreeft JH,et al.An electroencephalo-graphic classification for coma.Can J Neurol Sci,1997,24(4):320-325.
    [28]Lavizzari GS, Bassetti C. Prognostic value of EEG in post-anoxic coma after cardiac arrest.Eur Neurol,1987,26(2):161-170.
    [29]Synek VM. Prognostically important EEG coma patterns in diffuse anoxic and traumatic encephalopathies in adults.Clin Neurophsiol,1988,5(2):161-174.
    [30]张志芳,俞丽华,贾莉娟.37例心肺复苏后昏迷病人的脑电图分析[J].临 床脑电学杂志,2000,8(4):216-217.
    [31]孟淑敏,郭振华,李娜,等.持续监测重症脑血管病患者脑电图的价值[J].现代中西医结合杂志.2008,17(16):2467-2468.
    [32]李竹梅.动态脑电图对昏迷患者预后的评估价值.中国煤炭工业医学杂志[J].2009,12(7):1068-1069.
    [33]张干,苗青,叶斌,等.动态脑电图和脑干听觉诱发电位对重症脑血管病预后评估的比较研究[J].淮海医药.2008,26(2):95-96.
    [34]杨申,宁方波,刘运林,等.连续脑电监测评价重症脑血管病人预后的研究.中国实用神经病杂志.2008,11(6):17-18.
    [35]杨申,秦丽晨,周广安,等.连续脑电监测对脑干梗死患者预后的评价.泰山医学院学报.2008,29(4):263-264.
    [36]郑玉芬.脑出血急性期动态脑电图特征分析.实用医药杂志.2008,25(2):183-184.
    [37]肖丽萍,康志新,吴宝水,等.利用脑电频域指标评定脑梗死的预后[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志.2009,7(10):1250-1251.
    [38]Sheorajpanday RV,Nagels G,Weeren AJ,et al.Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke:Correlation with infarct volume and functional status in posterior circulation and lacunar syndromes.Clin Neuro-physiol.2010;122(5):884-890.
    [39]Cuspineda E, Machado C, Aubert E, et al. Predicting outcome in acute stroke: a comparison between QEEG and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Clin Electro-encephalogram 2003;34(1):1-4.
    [40]Cuspineda E, Machado C, Galan L, et al. QEEG prognostic value in acute stroke. Clin EEG Neurosci 2007;38(3):155-160.
    [41]Leon-Carrion J, Martin-Rodriguez JF, Damas-Lopez J, Delta-alpha ratio correlates with level of recovery after neurorehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009; 120(6):1039-1045.
    [42]Sheorajpanday RV, Nagels G, Weeren AJ, et al. Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke:Correlation with functional status after 6 months. Clin Neurophysiol.2011; 122(5):874-883.
    [43]Wenqing Wu, Junfeng Sun, Zheng Jin,et al. Impaired neuronal synchrony after focal ischemic stroke in elderly patients. Clinical Neuro-physiology.2011;12(1):21-26.
    [1]卫生部疾病控制司、中华医学会神经病学分会.《中国脑血管病防治指南(试行版)》脑梗死诊断标准.2005.5-6.
    [2]中华医学会全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.各类脑血管病疾病诊断要点.中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379.
    [3]高颖,马斌,刘强,等.缺血性中风证候要素诊断量表编制及方法学探讨.中医杂志.2011,52(24):2097-2101.
    [4]Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PC.Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel index and the modified Rankin scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials[J].Stroke,2005,36(9):1984-1987.
    [5]徐勇勇.医学统计学.北京:高等教育出版社,2001,65-67.
    [6]陈长生,徐勇勇,曹秀堂.不等距重复观测数据组间比较的正交回归模型[J].中国卫生统计,1996,13(3):125.
    [7]杨利,黄燕,蔡业峰,等.1418例中风患者痰瘀证候分布和演变规律探析[J].辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(6):459-460.
    [8l王莹莹.中风病急性期通腑法干预的规律研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2007.
    [9]耿晓娟,张军平,高颖,等.缺血性中风病急性期证候变化规律研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2010,25(9):1485-1487.
    [10]Oh Young Bang, Hee Young Park, Jung Han Yoon, et al.Predicting the long-term outcome after subacute stroke within the middle cerebral artery territory [J].J Clin Neurol,2005,1(2):148-158.
    [11]张春玲.泻热化痰方治疗急性脑梗塞的临床与实验研究[D].山东.济南:山东中医药大学.2005.
    [12]刘岑,高颖,邹忆怀.化痰通腑法治疗中风痰热证之临床应用与理论创新.[J].中国中医基础医学杂志.2011,17(1):89-91.
    [13]Van Putten MJ, Peters JM, Mulder SM,et al. A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115(5):1189-1194.
    [14]Van Putten MJ. The revised brain symmetry index.Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(11):2362-2367.
    [15]黄远桂.临床脑电图学[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700