用户名: 密码: 验证码:
大学生心理健康量表的修订和信效度研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:近年来,大学生的心理健康问题越来越受到人们的重视,成为社会关注的焦点。但是,目前对大学生心理健康进行研究的常用工具多系国外引进,且不是以大学生为适用对象,所以研究的效度问题十分突出,因此编制适合大学生这一特殊群体的心理健康测量工具具有重要的意义。本研究将在以前王欣教授研究的基础上:(1)建构对大学生心理健康状况进行评价的模式;(2)对大学生心理健康综合量表进行修订和完善,初步编制一个适合我国大学生的心理健康量表;(3)检验新编制的心理健康量表的信度和效度。
     方法:在石家庄市选择三所具有代表性的大学进行分层整群抽样,共抽取大学生1038名,女性667名,男性371名。采用探索性因素分析法发展大学生心理健康量表的初步理论结构,再选用验证性因素分析法证明理论结构的合理性和正确性。选用Cronbach'sα系数、分半相关和重测相关系数检验量表的信度;效度检验主要包括内容效度、结构效度和效标效度。
     结果:(1) 通过项目分析和初步的探索性因素分析,确定心理健康量表由54个项目组成。(2) 进一步探索性因素分析确定量表含有9个因素,共解释了总变异的52.88%。这9个因素分别命名为:躯体化,自尊,抑郁,目标感,人际关系,睡眠,焦虑,疲劳,强迫。(3) 内部一致性分析显示:Cronbach'sα系数、分半相关和重测相关系数分量表的分别为0.61—0.86,0.60—0.86,0.63—0.85;全量表的分别为0.95,0.93,0.83。(4) 量表内部相关分析显示,各项目与量表总分之间的相关系数在0.39—0.64之间,各分量表之间的相关系数为0.24—0.63,各分量表与全量表之间的相关系数为0.60—0.80,以上相关均具有显著性(P<0.01)。(5) 验证性因素分析证明该量表的理论结构模型与测验变量拟合良好,支持该量表的理论结构。(6) 性别差异比较显示:男大学生在“躯体化”和“焦虑”分量表上的得分显著高于女大学生,在“抑郁”分量表上的得分显著低于女大学生,其他各分量表和量表总分两者差异不显著。(7) 非独生子女与独生子女的差异比较显示:非独生子女在“睡眠”、“焦虑”、“强迫”分量表上得分以及量表总分都显著高于独生子女,其他各分量表上的得分两者差异不显著。(8) 贫困生与非贫困生的差异比较显示:贫困生在“自尊”、“抑郁”、“睡眠”、“强迫”四个分量表和量表总分都显著高于非贫困生。
     结论:(1) 本研究在以前研究的基础上初步完成了大学生心理健康量表的建构工作,且验证性因素分析证明该量表结构较为合理。(2) 信效度研究表明,该量表的同质信度、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度和效标效度都达到了心理测量学的要求。
Objective:Recently,the college students mental health has been paid more attention.But most scales be used came from abroad, and weren't applicable for college students.Therefor,it was very important to develop a mental health scale for using in college students. This study based on WangXin's study,it's aim is to: (1) explore the intra-structure of college student mental health;(2)revise the Comprehensive College Student Mental Health Scale,and develop a new Mental Health Scale for using in college student;(3)examine the reliability and validity of the scale.
    Methods:Taking 1038 college students(667 females,371 males) from three representative universities of Shijiazhuang by whole group.Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches were used to develop and evaluate the intra-structure of the scale.The reliability analysis included Cronbach's a ,split-half reliability,and test-retest reliability.The validity analysis included content,construct,and criterion-related validity.
    Results:(1)Using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,54 items are included in the scale.(2)Exploratory principal component analysis of the items indentified that the scale had nine factors,explaining 52.88% of the total variance.Nine factors was labeled as follows:Somatization, Self-esteem, Depression, Aim, Interpersonal relationship, Sleep, Anxiety, Tired-ness, Obsessive.(3)Internal consistency analysis showed that the Cronbach's a coefficient,split-half and test-retest correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.86,0.60 to 0.85, 0.63-0.85 respectively for each factor,and were 0.95,0.93 ,0.83 respectively for the total scale.(4)Inter-scale correlations studies showed that the correlations between items and total scores ranged from 0.39 to 0.64,the correlations among nine factors ranged form 0.24 to 0.63,the correlations between each factors and total scores ranged from 0.60 to 0.80. All correlations were significant(P<0.01).(5)Confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to assess the measurement of factor structure of the scale.The results supported nine-factor model of the scale.(6)Sex difference studies showed that the scores of Somatization .Anxiety in male college students were significantly higher than those in female college students.Significant higher score of Depression was found in female college students than those in male college students.(7)One-child difference studies showed that the scores of Sleep, Anxiety, Obsessive and
    
    
    
    whole scale in only-child were significantly lower than those in multi-child.(8)Family income difference studies showed that the scores of Eelf-esteem,Depression,Sleep, Obsessive and whole scale in low family income students were significantly higher than those in high family income students.
    Conclusions:(1) The study finished developing the structure of college student mental health scale,and confirmatory factor analysis studies showed the structure of the scale is pretty reasonable.(2)Psychometic properteis analysis showed that the scale achieved good to excellent levels of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and content, construct, and criterion-related validity.
引文
[1] Levy MR, DignanM, Shirreffs JH. Targeting wellness: Thecore. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992,1-20.
    [2] 张日升.青年心理学.北京师范大学出版社,1993,14-18.
    [3] Keum-HyeongChoi. Psychological Separation-Individuation and Adjustment to College Among Korean American Students: The Roles of Collectivism and Individulism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2002, 49, 4, 468-475.
    [4] 胡启先,易法建等.当代大学生社会心理问题及其对策.江西人民出版社,1999,237-255.
    [5] 纪宏.高师院校大学生心理素质调查研究及自杀危机干预.北京师范大学学报(社科版),1999,1,26-33.
    [6] Gerald L. Stone, Kristin M. Vesoia, et al. How Good Is Mental Health Care on College Campuses?. Jounal of Counseling Psychology, 2000,47,4, 498-510.
    [7] 樊富珉,王冰.优化大学生心理素质培养全面发展的人才——大学生心理素质优化的实验研究.消华大学教育研究,1999,2,76-83.
    [8] 王建中,樊富珉.北京市大学生心理卫生状况调研.中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16,5,331-333.
    [9] Constitution of the World Health Organization, Chronicle of the WHO, 1947,3.
    [10] Kaplan, L., Foundations of Human Behavior, 1965,323.
    [11] Menninger, K., The Human mind, (3rd ed), 1937, 1.
    [12] 周燕.关于我国学生心理健康研究的几点思考.教育研究与实验,1995,1,42-45.
    [13] Katz, B & Lewis, R., The Psychology of Abnormal Behavior, (nd ed), 1961,611.
    [14] 宋专茂,陈伟.心理健康测量.暨南大学出版社,1999,15.
    [15] Snaith R. Present use of the Hamilto Despression Rating Scale: Observations on methods of assessment in reasearch on depressive disorders. Br J Psychiatry, 1996,168,594-597.
    [16] 田宏碧,陈家麟.中国大陆心理健康标准研究十年的述评.心理科学,2003,26,4,704-708.
    [17] 金德初.精神健康的生存标准和发展标准.心理科学,1996,16,4,253-255.
    [18] 叶元辉.心理健康标准研究现状反思.福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,2,138-141.
    [19] 金勇,郭力平.心理健康观的历史演进.心理科学,1998,21,5,465-466.
    [20] 马建青等.大学生心理卫生.浙江大学出版社,1992,11,29—32.
    [21] 樊富珉.大学生心理健康与发展.清华大学出版社,1997,6,9-11.
    [22] 宋专茂,陈伟.心理健康测量.暨南大学出版社,1999,10,224-225.
    [23] 中国心理卫生杂志社,心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999,12,31-34.
    [24] 全国UPI应用课题组.大学生人格问卷UPI.1993,5.
    
    
    [25] M.M.PI,全国协作组(宋维真执笔).明尼苏达多相个性调查表在我国修订经过及使用评价.心理学报,1982,4,449-458.
    [26] 戴忠恒,祝蓓里.修订卡氏十六种人格因素量表手册.华东师范大学,1988.
    [27] 龚耀先.修订艾森克个性问卷手册.湖南医学院,1986.
    [28] 林增学,孟庆茂.大学生心理健康评价结构的研究.社会科学家,2001,3,29-32.
    [29] 李虹,梅锦荣.测量大学生的心理问题:GHQ—20的结构及其信度和效度.心理发展与教育,2002,1,75-79.
    [30] 翟宏,张挚,孟庆茂.大学生心理健康多维结构的探讨.中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10,3,197-199.
    [31] 李虹,陈会吕.大学生心理量表初步编制及试用.中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12,2,79-80.
    [32] 王欣,左晓冬.大学生心理调适综合量表的制订.健康心理学杂志,1999,7,3,320-322.
    [33] 王欣,王永丽,刘金花.大学生心理健康综合量表的修订.国际中华心身医学杂志,2003,5,3,138—139.
    [34] 中国心理卫生杂志社.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999,12,35-45.
    [35] 中国心理卫生杂志社.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999,12,194-197.
    [36] 中国心理卫生杂志社,心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999,12,235-238.
    [37] 中国心理卫生杂志社.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版),1999,12,284-287.
    [38] 吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务.中国铁道出版社,2000,8-9.
    [39] 漆书青,戴海崎,丁树良.现代教育与心理测量学原理.高等教育出版社,2002,8,12.
    [40] 彭凯平.心理测验—原理与实践.华夏出版社,1989,5,210.
    [41] Cox BJ, Swinson RP, Shaw BF. Value of the questionnaire in differentiating agoraphobia and social phobia. Br. J Psychiatry, J991,159,842-845.
    [42] Rapee RM, Craske MG, Barlow DH. Assessment instrument for panic disorder that includes fear of sensation-producing activities: The Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire. Anxiety, 1995,1,114-122.
    [43] Joseph F. Hair, JR. etc. (1995)Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th Edition. Prentice-Hall International, Inc, 374.
    [44] Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
    [45] Kim, Jae-On and Charles W. Mueller (1978a). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 13.
    [46] Kim, Jae-On and Charles W. Mueller (1978b). Factor Analysis: Statisticalmethods and practical issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 14.
    
    
    [47] Dunteman, George H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 69.
    [48] 谢晓庆,王丽.因素分析.中国社会科学出版社,1989,95-98.
    [49] Mulaik, S.A.(1990)Blurring the Distinction Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25,53-59.
    [50] 郭志刚.社会统计分析方法—SPSS软件应用.中国人民大学出版社,1999,12,98.
    [51] 彭凯平.心理测验—原理与实践.华夏出版社,1989,5,128.
    [52] 彭凯平.心理测验—原理与实践.华夏出版社,1989,5,149—150.
    [53] 缪小春,竺培梁译(AnastasiA, Urbina S著).心理测量,浙江教育出版社,2001,457-507.
    [54] Schwarzwald J, Weisenberg M, Solomon Z. Factor invariance of SCL-90-R:The case of combat stress reaction. Psychological Assessment, 1991, 3,3, 385-390.
    [55] Alem A, Kebede D, Woldesemaiat G, et al. The prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of mental distress in Buiajira, Ethiopia. Acta Psyehiatr Scand, 1999,100,48-55.
    [56] Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long J S. ed. Testing structural equations models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993,136-162.
    [57] Holden RR, Grigoriadis S. Psychometric properties of the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory for a psychiatric offender sample. J Clin Psychology, 1995,51,6,811-819.
    [58] 马莹,彭志启.地方高师学院大学生心理健康状况及成因浅析.渭南师范学院院报,2001,16,3,70—72.
    [59] 巴莺乔,张同延.中医院校大学生心理健康分析.健康心理学杂志,2000,8,6,604-606.
    [60] 张晓文.独生子女与非独生子女大学生个性发展及心理健康的比较.南京人口管理干部学院学报,2001,17,2,36.
    [61] 段长利,董元坤.在校独生子女大学生身心健康的对比分析.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15,6,450.
    [62] 姚齐和,赵传吕.独生子女与非独生子女心理健康状况比较研究.健康心理学杂忠,1998,6,4,427-429.
    [63] 王文娟.刘玉新,张建卫.特困大学生的心理健康及其人格研究.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15,6,453.
    [64] 张建卫.特困大学生的乐力源及应对方式研究.中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14,4,261.
    [65] 李俊丽,梅清梅.军校医学生心理健康状况调查分析.健康心理学杂志,2002,10,3,208.
    [66] 付云.刘秀芬,孙建功.医学生心理问题有关因素的研究.健康心理学杂志,2001,9,1,26.
    [67] 杨雪花,戴梅竞.大学生心理健康状况及其研究进展.国外医学.社会医学分册,2000,17,2,65.
    [68] 杨雪花,戴梅竞.大学生个性特征及其心理健康状况关系的研究.中国校医,2001,15,1,1-3.
    [69] Ifeld FW. Psychologic status of community residents along major demographic dimensions. Arch
    
    Gen Psychiatry, 1978, 35, 716-724.
    [70] Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Van der Ploeg HM, et sl. The well-being questionnaire:evidence for a three-factor structure with 12 items(W-BQ12). Psychological Medicine, 2000,30,455-462.
    [71] 彭凯平.心理测验—原理与实践.华夏出版社,1989,5,123.
    [72] Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale, Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983, 67, 6, 361-370.
    [73] Fava GA, Kellner R, Perini GI, et al. ltalian validation of the symptom rating test (SRT) and symptom questionnaire(SQ). Can J Psychiatry, 1983, 28, 3, 117-123.
    [74] Kellner R. A Symptom Questionnire. J Clin psychiatry, 1987, 48, 7, 268-274,

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700