用户名: 密码: 验证码:
两种方法治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
[目的]
     探讨老年性股骨粗隆间骨折,应用动力髋部螺钉(Dynamic Hip Screw,DHS)手术治疗与非手术治疗的疗效对比。
     [资料与方法]
     1 一般资料 对我院1999.10-2002.06收治的老年性股骨粗隆间骨折患者,随机抽取28例,均为行走跌伤。其中DHS手术治疗组14例,男7例,女7例,年龄61-78岁,平均69.5岁,根据胥少汀等分型,Ⅰ型2例,Ⅱ型2例,Ⅲ型5例,Ⅳ型3例,逆粗隆型2例。非手术治疗组14例,男6例,女8例,年龄63-80岁,平均71.5岁,Ⅰ型4例,Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型2例,Ⅳ型3例,逆粗隆型1例。
     2 治疗方法
     2.1 DHS手术治疗 本组病例入院后先行胫骨结节牵引3-5天,使肌肉松弛,骨折部位基本对位,同时做好各项术前准备,积极治疗并发症。手术操作要点:手术在C臂机监视下进行,采用连续硬膜外麻醉,侧卧位,患肢大粗隆外侧切口,使骨折端复位,粗螺钉进针点在大粗隆下2-2.5cm水平,股骨外侧中轴线上。C臂机定位:粗螺钉侧位于股骨颈的中轴线上,针尖深度至股骨头软骨下方约1.0-1.5cm处。在大粗隆1cm处平行于粗螺纹钉,经股骨颈向股骨头钉入1枚拉力螺钉,螺纹部须超过骨折线。无须拧紧粗螺钠钉尾部加压螺丝。术后加强护理,鼓励病人进行膝、踝关节功能锻炼,积极防治并发症。术后8周可扶拐不负重下地,对严重粉碎型骨折则必须卧床10-12周后复查X片,视骨痂生长情况决定是否扶拐下地。
     2.2 非手术治疗 本组病例全部采用胫骨结节牵引治疗。取髋关节外展约30°位,患肢置于布朗氏架上,行胫骨结节牵引,牵引重量为体重的1/7。牵引期间,定期床边摄片,及时调整牵引,必要时手法复位。牵引中注意防止外旋和内翻畸形,时间6-8周。对个别严重移位粉碎性骨折可适当延长至8-12周。去除牵引后继续在床上活动3-4周。牵引期间鼓励和协助患者进行功能锻炼,练习膝、踝关节功能,积极防治坠积性肺炎、泌尿系感染、褥疮及心血管疾病等并发症。
     2.3 疗效评定
     按骨折愈合情况,结合董纪元等髋关节疗效标准评分。优:骨折完全愈合,髋部无疼痛,髋关节活动范围恢复到术前状况。良:骨折愈合后,髋部偶有疼痛,活动范围基本正常,患者对治疗比较满意。可:骨折愈合,有轻度髋内翻,髋关节活动受限,有时疼痛。差:骨折畸形愈合或未愈合,髋部疼痛,不能下床活动。
     [结果]
     1 所有病例均获得6个月-2年半随访,平均随访1年半。DHS手术组与非手术治疗组的平均年龄、临床愈合时间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。而在住院时间方面,DHS手术组明显优于非手术治疗组,有显著性差异(P<0.01)。
     2 DHS手术组有效率为92.8%,非手术治疗组有效率为78.6%,DHS手术组有效率明显高于非手术治疗组(P<0.01),两组疗效有显著性差异。
    
    临床医学专业硕士学位论文
    〔结论〕
     老年性股骨粗隆间骨折应尽量争取手术.DHS具有加压与滑动双重功能,
    可以作为优先考虑的内固定方法.DHs主钉上方另加1枚拉力螺钉,可加大防旋
    作用.DHs加压螺钉的位置应是在正位平行于股骨颈的长轴,侧位位于股骨颈
    的中轴线上.仍不能放弃非手术治疗,要辩证地结合病人身体、经济等因素考
    虑,制定最佳治疗方案.
Most intertrochanteric fracture occur in eldly inviduals. The incidence of fracture of the intertrochanteric fracture is increasing, not unexpectedly.since the general life expectancy of the population has increased significantly during the past few decades.Operative treatment can decrease complication and motality rate and the patients can recover early. DHS has the function of compression and sliding and is relatively an ideal implant for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture at present.
    Objective
    To study the effects of dynamic hip screw(DHS) and non-operative treatment for treatment of senile femoral intertrochanteric fracture.
    Materials and Methods
    Twenty eight cases with femoral intertrochanteric fracture from 1999.10-2002.6
    in our hospital were divided into two groups randomly according to different
    treatment. Forteen patients were treated surgically with DHS. Forteen patients were
    treated conservatively with non-operative treatment.
    Result
    1 All the patients were followed up from six months to two and half years. Average age,clinical healing time of fracture were no obvious difference ( P > 0. 05 ) between grouo DHS and group non-operative treatment.Admitted time of grouo DHS were shortened significantly (P<0.01) ,compared with group non-operative treatment.
    2 The effective rates of group DHS and group non-operative treatment were 92.8% and 78.6% respectively. The effective rates of group DHS was significantly higher than that of group non-operative treatment (P<0.01) .
    Conclusion
    The senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture should be operated . DHS has function of compression and sliding. DHS is relatively an ideal implant for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture at present. The lag screw above the DHS lag screw is effective for controlling the rotation of the fracture. The tail of DHS lag screw should be loose. In the antero-posterior X-ray film,the position of the lag screw should be paralled to the long axis of the neck of the femur .In the lateral X-ray film, the position of the lag screw should be on the medial axis of the femoral neck. The non-operative treatment is nessary in some cases.
引文
1 毛宾尧.髋关节外科学,北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.216-219
    2 王亦璁主编.骨与关节损伤.第3版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.865
    3 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学.第2版,北京,人民军医出版社.1999.677-678
    4 徐龙江,等.牵引治疗股骨粗隆间骨折(附87例报告.骨与关节损伤杂志,2001,16(2):130-131.
    5 胥少汀,等.实验性粗隆间骨折不同内固定方法的生物力学比较.中华外科杂志,1991,29:251
    6 谷避龄,等.130度角钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折,骨与关节损伤杂志,1992;7(1):29-30
    7 荣国威,等.骨科内固定.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1995:181
    8 范为民,等.四种股骨转子间骨折内固定物的力学对比及疗效评价.中华骨科杂志,1996;16(4)229-231
    9 王福全,等.加压滑动鹅头钉的应力测试对髋部骨折治疗的效果.中华骨科杂志,1990;10(3):165-167,
    10 周跃,加压滑动鹅头钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床与实验研究.中华创伤杂志,1995;11(1):7-9
    11 曾秋涛,等.DHS与骨水泥并用治疗伴有严重骨质疏松的股骨粗隆间骨折,广东医学,2001,22(5):415-416.
    12 范为民,等.股骨转子间骨折内固定物的力学研究及疗效观察.中华骨科杂志,1995;15(9):581-583
    13 荣国威 译.骨科内固定(第三版),北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.367.
    14 袁宏,等.95’髁钢板与Richards钉治疗老年转子间骨折.骨与关节损伤,2000,15(4):305-306.
    
    
    15 吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学.第四版,北京:人民卫生出版社,1986:1945
    16 周建伟,等.Gamma钉与滑动式鹅头钉的生物力学分析及临床疗效.中华骨科杂志,1996;16(4):225-227
    17 李斯明,等.加锁髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折生物力学分析及临床疗效.中华骨科杂志,1996;16(4):225-227
    18 韩一生,等.Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折20例初步报告.骨与关节损伤杂志,1994;9(3):161-162
    19 ridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, et al. Fixation of intertrochanoric fracture of the femar:a randomised Prospectice comparison of the Gammx nail and dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1991;73:330
    20 Tardis TG.Stress analysis of the femur, J Biomech, 1969;1:163
    21 粱伟国,等.改良Camma钉手术治疗股骨转子周围部骨折.中华骨科杂志,1995;15(80;512-514
    22 冯华.Gamma钉治疗不稳定粗隆部骨折.创伤骨科杂志,1994;2(3):160-161
    23 戴戎主译.现代骨科学.第1版,北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002,389.
    24 纪方,等.人工假体置换治疗高龄老年人不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折.骨与关节损伤杂志,2002,17(3):184-185.
    25 合润基,等.股骨转子间骨折压缩外固定支架的生物力学研究与应用.中华骨科杂志,1994;14(10):586-588
    26 于仲嘉,等.单侧多功能外固定支架的临床应用(附2524例报告).中华骨科志,1996;16(4):211-214.
    27 王金河.麦氏鹅头钉内固定治疗股骨转子问骨折失误8例报告.中华骨科志,1994;14(12):778-779
    28 王福权,等.加压滑动鹅头钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折106例分析.骨与关节损伤杂志,1995;10(1):12-13.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700