梁家构造带浅层万昌组油藏特征分析
|
摘要
伊通盆地属佳-伊地堑的南段,是郯庐断裂带的北延部分,伊通盆地可分为莫里青断陷、伊丹隆起、鹿乡断陷和岔路河断陷四个二级构造单元,本次研究区位于岔路河断陷南部的梁家构造区。伊通盆地岔路河断陷的梁家构造带油气资源丰富,具有很大的增长潜力。以往岔路河断陷梁家构造的油气勘探以深层为主,近年来虽然在浅层油气勘探有所突破,但该区未作为目的层,基础研究比较薄弱、基本处于研究空白。本文主要研究梁家构造带浅层地层划分与油气藏规律,包括地层层序划分与对比、沉积相和沉积特征、储层评价,理论上解决梁家构造带的沉积类型、探索梁家构造带浅层油气成藏规律,油气藏的类型,寻找有利目标评价,对实现岔路河断陷的油气补充资源的新突破具有重要意义。
Yitong basin is located in the eastern part of jilin province, It’s the Strick-slip Fault basin of Tertiary in Jilin province, which belong to the southern part of Jiamusi-Yitong graben, also it’s the North-extension of the Tanlu fracture and running across Changchun and Jilin along north-west direction, the area is about 2200 square kilometers. It’s divided into Moliqing fault depression、Luxiang fault depression、Chaluhe fault depression, It auxesis Shuangyang formation、Sheling formation、Yongji formation、Wanchang formation、Qijia formation of Paleogene, Chaluhe formation of Neogene and Quaternary in the basin. By the study of sedimentary facies analysis of source rock series, Characteristics of reservoir, the text definitudes the major zones’oil and gas source and migration direction Liangjia structure belt, In addition, discussed the model for formation of reservoir of fault basin.
Liangjia structure belt is very complicated in shallow layer, There is no typical mark layer. In view of the content of the researchin this project, In order to resume the paleo-sedimentary characteristic of the first and second of Wanchang formation and the bottle of Qijia formation, On the basis of using drilling stratified data partly by predecessor, By using of the correction of logging cure and calibration of synthetic seismogram, we carry on the stratigraphic correlation of stratified boundary of every members of Wanchang formation and the first member of Qijia formation and set up the stratigraphic framework of this area.
In this research, by the detailed observation of rock core and the analysis of logging and seismic data, Combing with some methods such as rock and mineral identification and grain analysis,We identificated two sedimentary facies from Wanchang formation strata in the research area.They are lacustrine face and shallow nearshore subaqueous face. Further, they are allocated into 6 sedimentary subfacies and 10 sedimentary microfacies.
In the whole sediment form the first member of Wanchang formation to the third member of Wanchang formation, Southeast accommodation which come from the chang 30 to chang 105 well zone is alwaysly stable material source and chang less,. Southwest accommodation which come from xing 6 to xing 108 have been decreasing. The two accommodation which come from chang 29-1、xing 19 and xing 19-3 aren’t stable in the sedimentary process and swing intensively after entering lacustrine basin. It make the sedimentary facies chang obviously in different stage.
By analysis of the date of porosity and permeability in the research area, We recognize that the reservoir petrophysical property is the best favorable with medium and low porosity and medium anf low permeability. On the basis of analyzing the data of the reservoir porosity and permeability, because of compaction , The porosity and permeability decrease along with the increase of the depth in the whole, but the dissolution make secondary porosity more big. In 750m～1500m, there is the first secondary porosity. There are second secondary porosity in more deep section. In research area, the influential factors of reservoir property is depth、grain、separation the type of sedimentary microfacies、diagenesis and so on. In the stage of Shuangyang formation、Sheling formation and Yongji formation, the sedimentary face of the study area is mainly half deep lake—deep lake. There are mainly three sets of source rock which distribute broadly and deposit thickly, It makes the solidly foudmation for hydrocarbon generating. In Wanchang formation and Qijia formation the exogenous sub-lacustrine fan sand body upgrowthed in the lake, which proviod a favorable reservoir space for the hydrocarbon accumulation and form good reservoir-seal combination.
Through the analysis of the typical oil and gas reservoir which have been found in the study area. Combining the analysis of the regulation of Hydrocarbon accumulation, According to trap shape and genetic types,we consider that the types of oil reservoir which may exist are fault-anticline oil and gas reservoir、Step-fault reservoir、Uplift in the graben oil and gas reservoir、Lens of lithologic reservoir、fault-lithologic pinch out on the dump reservoir, On the basis of the research of oil and gas geological conditions, Combining with a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of reservoir profile, We summarize preliminary the regulation of hydrocarbon accumulation and set up its basic mode.
Hydrocarbon accumulation in this area include mainly the following Aspects:①Adequate oil and gas sources are the basis for hydrocarbon accumulation;②Good oil and gas migration pathway is a necessary condition for hydrocarbon accumulation in the Oligocene;③A certain amount of storage space and matching of Reasonable reservoir-seal combination is assurance of hydrocarbon accumulation.
The mode of hydrocarbon accumulation in this area are as follows: Hydrocarbon source rocks in Shuangyang Formation enter the stage of low-mature in early Yongji Formation, Low mature oil and gas was generated mainly in Yongji Formation. Apart from some of the supply for its own reservoir, the rest of oil and gas escape along the edge of fault-controlled basin. Hydrocarbon source rocks in shuangyang Formation generate mainly mature oil in the deposition stage of wanchang Formation, Hydrocarbon source rocks in sheling formation generate mainly low mature oil and gas, major oil source is from the hydrocarbon source rocks in shuangyang Formation. At that moment,Ⅱfault activities strongly, Not only some rolling anticline were formed in Wanchang Formation of liangjia structure zone, But also a series of fault of internal basin were developed, which were in the same or opposite direction with fault-controlled basin in the edge of basin, In spite of disconnected distance of these fault, they established the relationship between hydrocarbon source rocks and reservoir in lower part with the reservoir in Wanchang and Qijia Formation in upper part, which make some part of mature medium oil and moisture migrated upward along theⅡfault and gather in the upper reservoir.
Yitong basin is located in the eastern part of jilin province, It’s the Strick-slip Fault basin of Tertiary in Jilin province, which belong to the southern part of Jiamusi-Yitong graben, also it’s the North-extension of the Tanlu fracture and running across Changchun and Jilin along north-west direction, the area is about 2200 square kilometers. It’s divided into Moliqing fault depression、Luxiang fault depression、Chaluhe fault depression, It auxesis Shuangyang formation、Sheling formation、Yongji formation、Wanchang formation、Qijia formation of Paleogene, Chaluhe formation of Neogene and Quaternary in the basin. By the study of sedimentary facies analysis of source rock series, Characteristics of reservoir, the text definitudes the major zones’oil and gas source and migration direction Liangjia structure belt, In addition, discussed the model for formation of reservoir of fault basin.
Liangjia structure belt is very complicated in shallow layer, There is no typical mark layer. In view of the content of the researchin this project, In order to resume the paleo-sedimentary characteristic of the first and second of Wanchang formation and the bottle of Qijia formation, On the basis of using drilling stratified data partly by predecessor, By using of the correction of logging cure and calibration of synthetic seismogram, we carry on the stratigraphic correlation of stratified boundary of every members of Wanchang formation and the first member of Qijia formation and set up the stratigraphic framework of this area.
In this research, by the detailed observation of rock core and the analysis of logging and seismic data, Combing with some methods such as rock and mineral identification and grain analysis,We identificated two sedimentary facies from Wanchang formation strata in the research area.They are lacustrine face and shallow nearshore subaqueous face. Further, they are allocated into 6 sedimentary subfacies and 10 sedimentary microfacies.
In the whole sediment form the first member of Wanchang formation to the third member of Wanchang formation, Southeast accommodation which come from the chang 30 to chang 105 well zone is alwaysly stable material source and chang less,. Southwest accommodation which come from xing 6 to xing 108 have been decreasing. The two accommodation which come from chang 29-1、xing 19 and xing 19-3 aren’t stable in the sedimentary process and swing intensively after entering lacustrine basin. It make the sedimentary facies chang obviously in different stage.
By analysis of the date of porosity and permeability in the research area, We recognize that the reservoir petrophysical property is the best favorable with medium and low porosity and medium anf low permeability. On the basis of analyzing the data of the reservoir porosity and permeability, because of compaction , The porosity and permeability decrease along with the increase of the depth in the whole, but the dissolution make secondary porosity more big. In 750m～1500m, there is the first secondary porosity. There are second secondary porosity in more deep section. In research area, the influential factors of reservoir property is depth、grain、separation the type of sedimentary microfacies、diagenesis and so on. In the stage of Shuangyang formation、Sheling formation and Yongji formation, the sedimentary face of the study area is mainly half deep lake—deep lake. There are mainly three sets of source rock which distribute broadly and deposit thickly, It makes the solidly foudmation for hydrocarbon generating. In Wanchang formation and Qijia formation the exogenous sub-lacustrine fan sand body upgrowthed in the lake, which proviod a favorable reservoir space for the hydrocarbon accumulation and form good reservoir-seal combination.
Through the analysis of the typical oil and gas reservoir which have been found in the study area. Combining the analysis of the regulation of Hydrocarbon accumulation, According to trap shape and genetic types,we consider that the types of oil reservoir which may exist are fault-anticline oil and gas reservoir、Step-fault reservoir、Uplift in the graben oil and gas reservoir、Lens of lithologic reservoir、fault-lithologic pinch out on the dump reservoir, On the basis of the research of oil and gas geological conditions, Combining with a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of reservoir profile, We summarize preliminary the regulation of hydrocarbon accumulation and set up its basic mode.
Hydrocarbon accumulation in this area include mainly the following Aspects:①Adequate oil and gas sources are the basis for hydrocarbon accumulation;②Good oil and gas migration pathway is a necessary condition for hydrocarbon accumulation in the Oligocene;③A certain amount of storage space and matching of Reasonable reservoir-seal combination is assurance of hydrocarbon accumulation.
The mode of hydrocarbon accumulation in this area are as follows: Hydrocarbon source rocks in Shuangyang Formation enter the stage of low-mature in early Yongji Formation, Low mature oil and gas was generated mainly in Yongji Formation. Apart from some of the supply for its own reservoir, the rest of oil and gas escape along the edge of fault-controlled basin. Hydrocarbon source rocks in shuangyang Formation generate mainly mature oil in the deposition stage of wanchang Formation, Hydrocarbon source rocks in sheling formation generate mainly low mature oil and gas, major oil source is from the hydrocarbon source rocks in shuangyang Formation. At that moment,Ⅱfault activities strongly, Not only some rolling anticline were formed in Wanchang Formation of liangjia structure zone, But also a series of fault of internal basin were developed, which were in the same or opposite direction with fault-controlled basin in the edge of basin, In spite of disconnected distance of these fault, they established the relationship between hydrocarbon source rocks and reservoir in lower part with the reservoir in Wanchang and Qijia Formation in upper part, which make some part of mature medium oil and moisture migrated upward along theⅡfault and gather in the upper reservoir.
引文
[1]陈丽华,王家华。油气储层研究技术。石油工业出版社,2000,198-204
[2]戴启德,纪友亮。油气储层地质学。石油大学出版社,1996,1:43-44
[3]邸世祥。中国碎屑岩储集层的孔隙结构。西北大学出版社,1991,78-85
[4]王治华。青阳岔油田长2段砂岩油藏储层特征研究。应用技术,2006,5(10):5-6
[5]王琪等。鄂尔多斯盆地西部三叠系长2油层组砂岩成岩演化特征[J]。天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):261-267
[6]张丽娟,李多丽,孙玉善,程明。库车坳陷西部古近纪-白垩系沉积储层特征分析。天然气地球科学。2006,17(3):355-360
[7]邓荣敬,徐备,漆家福等。北塘凹陷古近系沙河街组三段沉积特征及储层的影响因素。岩石矿物学杂志。2006,25(3):230-236
[8]裘亦楠,薛叔浩。油气储层评价技术第一版。北京,石油工业出版社,1994,53-66, 243-244
[9]冯增昭。沉积岩石学。第二版。北京:石油工业出版社,1993,97-131, 145--164
[10]中国石油天然气总公司科技发展局。中国油气储层研究论文集。北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[11]朱陆忠,赵秀梅,王春喜。十屋断陷成岩作用及储层评价。天然气工业,2000, 20(增刊);30-33
[12]刘吉余,尹万泉,邱莎。曙22块杜家台油层沉积特征。大庆石油学院学报,1998, 22(3)- 74-79
[13]吕晓光,赵永胜,史晓波。储层分类方法的应用及评价。大庆石油地质与开发,1995, 14(3): 11-15
[14]强子同,碳酸盐岩储层地质学。东营:石油大学出版社,1998,347-354
[15]马良,周江羽,王旭丽,揭异新,邱玉超,苗红波,李楠。伊通盆地岔路河断陷始新统地层对比。石油实验地质,2008,30(3):260-264
[16]贾倩,赵彦超,方度,苗红波。伊通盆地岔路河断陷地层水化学特征与油气保存关系。地质科技情报。2008,27(2):63-67
[17]贾倩。伊通地堑岔路河断陷流体识别及油气藏分布研究。武汉:中国地质大学硕士学位论文,2008
[18]王剑,徐翔军,陈秀艳,李本才,王伟涛。伊通地堑岔路河断陷南段构造—沉积特征与油气藏类型。世界地质。2007,26(2):240-244
[19]李本才,刘鸿友,杜怀旭,纪洪永,孙凯,张五一。伊通盆地含油气系统与油气藏。中国石油勘探。2003,8(3):38-44
[20]梁春秀,魏志平,李本才,盛久斌。伊兰—伊通盆地输导体系与油气运聚。天然气工业。2002,22(1):31-32
[21]侯德艳,魏魁生,李本才,赵霞。伊通盆地岔路河地区早第三纪层序地层模式与隐蔽圈闭预测。大庆石油地质与开发。2006,25(4):9-12
[22]孙万军,刘宝柱,李本才,宋立中。伊通地堑断层系统与构造样式。现代地质。2004,18(4):505-509
[23]周恒涛,杜怀旭,闫丽萍,许圣传,马启龙,朱建峰。伊通盆地岔路河断陷始新统岩性圈闭研究。世界地质。2006,25(4):396-400
[24]严杰,陈红汉,丰勇,王立武,江涛,苗洪波。伊通盆地岔路河断陷油气充注与再次运移研究。地质科技情报。2009,28(1):69-74
[25]王旭丽,周江羽,马良,揭异新,苗洪波,邱玉超,李楠。伊通盆地岔路河断陷重力流沉积特征及油气勘探意义。石油实验地质。2008,30(1):26-31
[26]刘生国,翟永红,郭建华。塔中地区石炭系碎屑岩储层孔隙结构特征与储层评价,江汉石油学院学报,1995, 17(3): 8-12
[27]顾惠荣,贾健谊,吴伟力,陈明。东海平湖油气田下第三系平湖组储层评价。海洋石油,2002, 2:1-7
[28]周丽梅,李德发,刘文碧。大丘构造S组储层孔隙结构特征及储层评价。矿物岩石,1999,19(2):47-51
[29]刘为付,刘双龙,孙立新,张永清,苗洪波。大港枣园油田孔二段储层综合评价。大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3): 5-7
[30]赖内克H.E,辛格I.B。陆源碎屑岩沉积环境。北京:石油工业出版社。1979,222-262
[31]王振奇,张昌民等,安棚深层系扇三角洲低渗致密砂岩储层综合评价。江汉石油学院学报,2002, 24(3):1-6
[32]罗蛰潭,王允诚。油气储集层的孔隙结构。北京;科学出版社,1986,198-206
[33]杨建业,杜美利,苏小鹏。李慧利煤层气藏的储集特征及储层评价,西安地质学院学报,1995,17(3):78-82
[34]裘亦楠,薛叔浩,应凤祥。中国陆相油气储集层。北京:石油工业出版社,1997,149-211
[35]贺伟,钟孚勋,贺承祖,冯文光。储层岩石孔隙的分形结构研究和应用。天然气工业,2000, 20(2):67-70
[36]曾伟,强平,黄继祥。川东嘉二段孔隙层下限及分类与评价,矿物岩石,1997,17(2):42 -48
[37]曾文冲。油气藏储集层测井评价技术。北京:石油工业出版社,1991,58—91,93-98
[38]马雪团。济阳坳陷车古201潜山储层综合评价。江汉石油学院学报,2002,240:23-25
[39]林承焰,侯连华,车翔飞。冷家堡油田水平井油藏岩相分析及储层评价。石油大学学报。1997,21(2):13-17
[40]阎长辉,戴达山,陈青。流动单元法评价储层的展布特征。成都理工学院学报,2002,29(1): 37-40
[41]刘孟慧,赵澄林。碎屑岩储层成岩演化模式。石油大学出版社,1993,1:77-78
[42]理查德A,沙茨英格,约翰F。乔丹主编,宋新民,罗凯,张仲宏等译。储层表征新进展。北京::石油工业出版社,2002,1:43-52
[43]毛俊莉,张凤莲,鞠俊成。辽河盆地西部凹陷鸳双地区沙二段储层评价及有利储层预测。古地理学报,2001,3(3):76-83
[44]穆龙新,贾爱林,陈亮等。储层精细研究方法-国内外露头储层和现代沉积及精细地质建模。石油工业出版社,2000,1:43-45
[45]庞雯,赵靖舟。塔北隆起三叠系储层评价及储盖组合。西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(2):1-6
[46]沙文武,邵江,郭耀华。镇泾地区三叠系延长组储层评价。天然气工业,2001,21(增刊):36-42
[47]王永兴,刘玉洁,卢宏等。高孔隙度砂岩储层中砂体成因类型、孔隙结构与渗透率的关系。大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(1):12-16
[48]阎长辉,戴达山,陈青。流动单元法评价储层的展布特征。成都理工学院学报,2002, 29(1):36-40
[49]张人雄,邓志展,毛中源等。焉耆盆地宝浪油田低孔低渗储集层孔隙结构特征。新疆石油地质,1998,19(6):485-489
[50]赵约华,王敏。双河油田储层结构特征分类及影响因素。石油学报,1994,15(4):31-39
[51]朱陆忠,赵秀梅,王春喜。十屋断陷成岩作用及储层评价。天然气工业,2000,20(增刊): 30-35
[52]朱建伟,刘招君,董清水。松辽盆地层序地层格架及油气聚集规律。石油地球物理勘探, 2001,36(3):339-344
[53]中国石油天然气总公司勘探局编,赵澄林著。储层沉积学。北京:石油工业出版社,1998, 17-19
[54]董清水。伊通盆地莫里青断陷双阳组储层特征与形成机理,博士论文
[55]雍世和,洪有密测井资料综合解释与数字处理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982,9-10
[56]郎丰吉,刘江,孙树文等。阵列感应测井在疑难储层开发中的应用[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):87-89
[57]宋渝新,张君劫,杨宏等。综合利用测井资料评价油气层[J]。新疆石油地质,2006,27(1):96-98
[58]张莉,孙宏智,张美玲等。应用阵列感应资料对复杂侵入现象的解释[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(4):99-100
[59]王方雄,苏坚。电阻率和孔隙度测井曲线重盈法的新应用[J]。江汉石油学院学报,2001(23)增刊:69-70
[60]杨碧松。低矿化度地层水地层油气水层识别研究[J]。天然气工业,2000,20(2):42-44
[61]樊政军,赵冬梅,蔺学漫。复杂碎屑岩储层的流体性质判别方法研究[J]。天然气工业(地质与勘探)2007,27(1):47-50
[62]向树安,姜在兴,张元福。盐系地层低电阻率油层形成机理与识别一以江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组为例[J]。天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):514-517
[63]赵永刚。侧向测井和感应测井识别水层的对比分析[J].测井技术,2004,28(5):427-429
[64]郑雷清。双电法测井在低电阻率储层流体性质识别中的应用[J]。石油天然气学报,2006,28(3):304-306
[65]郑雷清,杨斌,赵海燕等。吐哈盆地特低孔渗性砂岩储层侧井评价方法[J]。吐哈油气,2006,11(4):368-372
[66]闫家宁,刘兴周,王庆魁等。自来屯油田低阻油层测井识别技术研究[J]。河南石油,2004,18(5):17-20
[67]刘英才,余国义,韩桂芹等。阿达油田低阻、低对比油层的成因与识别[J]。江汉石油学院,2003,25(3):8-9
[68]闫磊,潘保芝,莫修文等。几种评价低阻储层的导电模型[J]。吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(增刊):121-125
[69]谭廷栋。测井解释发现油气层[J]。天然气工业(地质勘探),2000,20(6):47-50
[70]邵春华。吐哈油田稠油层低阻成因分析及测井识别方法[J]。吐哈油气,2006,11(4):373-376
[71]王贺林,申本科,陈景萍。自然伽马能谱测井对砂砾岩地层的精细划分[J]。石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(增刊):127-132
[72]代建华,李绍霞。自然伽马能谱测井在东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩体中的应用[J]。油气地质与采收率,2004,11(4):78-80
[73]吴春文,赵文杰,柏强。自然伽马能谱测井在砂砾岩油藏中的应用[J]。测井技术,2005,29(1):46-48
[74]张丽艳,才巨宏,陈钢花。砂砾岩储集层含油性解释方法[J]。测井技术,2002,26(2):134-136
[75]常静春,郝丽萍,燕兴荣等。含砾砂岩储层岩性及流体性质判别[J]。测井技术,2005,29(3):230-232
[76]高博禹,彭仕亦,刘红歧。蒙古林砾岩油藏储层测井精细解释模型[J]。测井技术,2005,29(1):55-58
[77]刘子良。吉林油田低渗透砂岩油藏流体识别。北京:中国地质大学(北京),学位论文,2005
[78]罗蛰潭,王允诚。油气储集层的孔隙结构[M]。科学出版社,1986,21-23,124-129
[79]辛长静,何幼斌,董桂玉。毛管压力曲线在储层微观非均质性研究中的应用[J]。河南石油,2006,20(3):57-59
[80]廖明光,李士伦,谈德辉。砂岩储层渗透率与压汞曲线特征参数间的关系[J]。西南石油学院学报,2001,23(4):5-8
[81]雍世和,张超漠。测井资料处理与综合解释[M]。石油大学出版社,1996,205-214
[82]中石油勘探与生产公司。低阻油气藏测井识别评价方法与技术[M]。北京石油工业出版社,2006,72-77
[83]唐文生,符晓颖,白丽等。后期水侵型复杂断切岩性油藏评价[J]。测井技术,2000,24(1):36-41
[84]楼章华,金爱民,朱蓉等。松辽盆地油田地下水化学场的垂直分带性与平面分区性[J]。地质科学,2006,41(3):392-403
[85]王永春。伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏[M]。第一版,北京:石油工业出版社,2001,168-169
[86]刘斌,黄郑,龙国清等。低渗透储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响[J]。特种油气藏,2005,12(3):18—21
[87]牟汉生,姜在兴,邱隆伟等。东营凹陷现河地区沙三段下亚段储层成岩作用[J]。油气地质与采收率,2007,14(4):50-52
[88]杨占宝。郯庐断裂带中新生代演化与含油气盆地形成分布综述[J]。地质力学学报,2006,12(1):43-48,70
[89]孟元林,王志国,杨俊生等。成岩作用过程综合模拟及其应用[J]。石油实验地质,2003,25(2):211-215,220
[90]穆曙光,张以明。成岩作用及阶段对碎屑岩储层孔隙演化的控制[J]。西南石油学院学报,1994,16(3):22-27
[91]李忠,李蕙生。东濮凹陷深部次生孔隙成因与储层演化研究[J]。地质科学,1994,29(3): 267-275
[92]郑秀才。鄂尔多斯盆地中部马五4亚段成岩作用及储集性能[J]。西安地质学院学报,1996,18(1):43-49
[93]尹燕义,王国娟,张学汝等。冷家油田储层成岩作用及对孔隙演化的影响[J]。断块油气田,1996,3(3):29-32
[94]刘玉洁,王永兴。茂兴地区扶-杨油层碎屑岩储层非均质性及孔隙演化模式[J]。大庆石油学院学报,1994,18(4):19-22
[95]谢继容。砂岩次生孔隙形成机制[J]。天然气勘探与开发,2000,23(1):52-55,51
[96]刘林玉,陈刚,柳益群等。碎屑岩储集层溶蚀型次生孔隙发育的影响因素分析[J]。沉积学报,1998,16(2):97-101
[97]余成林,李相明,彭寿昌等。安塞油田南部侏罗系延8～延9储层特征及控制因素研究[J]。河南石油,2005,19(6):1-3
[98]赵永刚,陈景山,蒋裕强等。川中公山庙油田中侏罗统沙溪庙组一段储层特征及控制因素[J]。天然气勘探与开发,2006,29(1):10-16,23
[99]庞雯,郭德运,赵靖舟等。鄂尔多斯盆地甘谷驿油田东区长6油层储层特征及储层评价[J]。兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(5):96-99
[100]王振奇,何贞铭,徐龙等。鄂尔多斯盆地葫芦河地区三叠系延长组低渗致密砂岩储层特征研究[J]。江汉石油学院学报,1998,20(2):27-32,37
[101]李凤杰,王多云,徐旭辉。鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组储层特征及影响因素分析[J]。石油实验地质,2005,27(4):365-370
[102]杨铭辉,郭力,赵洪涛等。松辽盆地南部东南隆起区储层特征[J]。石油实验地质,2006,28(4):330-334
[103]李捷,王海云。东北晚中生代断陷盆地储层次生孔隙形成机制[J]。沉积学报,1999,17(4): 591-595
[104]张忠民,朱伟,赵澄林等。辽河盆地下第三系深部碎屑岩储层次生孔隙演化模式及其分布[J]。大庆石油学院学报,2002,26(3):12-14
[105]李义军。浅述次生孔隙的成因[J]。西北地质,2002,35(1):65-69
[106]崔勇,赵澄林。深层砂岩次生孔隙的成因及其与异常超压泄漏的关系—以黄骅坳陷板桥凹陷板中地区滨Ⅳ油组为例[J]。成都理工学院学报,2002,29(1):49-52
[107]马艳萍,刘立,闫建萍等。松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷扶杨油层次生孔隙特征及其与烃类侵位的关系[J]。世界地质,2003,22(1):36-40
[108]邱隆伟,姜在兴,陈文学等。一种新的储层孔隙成因类型—石英溶解型次生孔隙[J]。沉积学报,2002,20(4):621-627
[109]蒋凌志,顾家裕,郭彬程。中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征及形成机理[J]。沉积学报,2004,22(1):13-18
[110]李云省,邓鸿斌,吕国祥等。储层微观非均质性的分形特征研究[J]。天然气工业,2002,22(1):37-40
[111]蔡毅,魏萍等。储层微观孔隙结构特征空间展布研究方法[J]。石油学报,1994,15(增刊):76-81
[112]陈杰,周改英,赵喜亮等。储层岩石孔隙结构特征研究方法综述[J]。特种油气藏,2005,12(4):11-14
[113]郭巍,刘彦杰,王建功等。松辽盆地英台地区储层砂岩体微观结构特征研究[J]。长春科技大学学报,1998,28(2):162-165,175
[114]肖亮,刘晓鹏,陈兆明等。核磁毛管压力曲线构造方法综述[J]。断块油气田,2007,14(2): 86-88
[115]库丽曼,刘树根,朱平等。成岩作用对致密砂岩储层物性的影响—以川中地区上三叠统须四段气藏为例[J]。天然气工业,2007,27(1):33-36
[116]贾存富,蒋龙。恳东521储层物性特征[J]。内蒙古石油化工,2007,(2):113-114
[117]李兴国,孙春红,赵云飞。喇嘛甸油田储层微观结构特征变化规律研究[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(1):79-82
[118]唐海发,彭仕宓,赵彦超等。致密砂岩储层物性的主控因素分析[J]。西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(1):59-63
[119]陈鹃,黄郑,龙国清等。宝浪油田储层沉积微相及非均质性特征[J]。西部探矿工程,2005,(9):53-54
[120]郑浚茂,于兴河,谢承强等。不同沉积环境储层的层内非均质性—以黄骅坳陷为例[J]。现代地质,1995,9(4):501-508
[121]裘亦楠,许仕策,肖敬修等。沉积方式与碎屑岩储层的层内非均质性[J]。石油学报,1985,6(1):41-49
[122]刘顺生,胡复唐。洪积扇砾岩储层非均质性及非均质模型[J]。新疆石油地质,1993,14(4): 350-356
[123]鲜本忠,吴战国,姜在兴等。早期成岩作用研究进展及发展方向[J]。石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(6):133-139
[124]李世银。惠民凹陷商25断块沙四段沉积体系时空展布与储层特征研究[C]。中国科学院,2007
[125]赵国泉。吉林油田岔路河断陷下第三系沉积岩石学及含油性研究[C]。中国地质大学,2002
[126]薛良清,GallowayWE。扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲与三角洲体系的分类[J]。地质学报,1991,65(2):141-153
[127]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆?阈虻夭慊济娴氖侗稹⒍员燃际跫坝τ肹J]。石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-184
[128]赵红格,刘池洋。物源分析方法及研究进展[J]。沉积学报,2003,21(3):309-413
[129]王良忱,张金亮著。沉积环境和沉积相[M]。石油工业出版社,1996
[130]闫义,林舸,王岳军等。盆地陆源碎屑沉积物对源区构造背景的指示意义[J]。地球科学进展,2002,17(1):85-90
[131]马明侠,马金龙。松辽盆地两江地区沉积体系分布规律[J]。大庆石油地质与发,2000,19(3):4～6
[132]刘建清,赖兴运等。成岩作用的研究现状及展望[M]。石油实验地质,2006
[133]吕晓光,赵永胜,史晓波。储层分类方法的应用及评价[J]。大庆石油地质与发,1995,14(3): 11-15
[134]康安,王贵文。陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J]。沉积学报,2003,31(2):283～287
[135]高淑梅,粱长宽,周文革。毛管压力相对渗透率曲线在二连地区的应用[J]。测井技术,2002,26(1):64-67
[136]H.G。Reading,Sedimentary Environments:Processes,Facies and Stratigraphy,1996,494-495
[137]John G,Mcpherson,etal。Fan deltas and braid deltas:conceptual problems。In: NemecW,Steel Rl,eds。Fan deltas。Springer-Verlag,1988,14-22
[138]Orton GJ。A Spectrum of Middle Ordovician fan delta and braid plain deltas,North Wales:a consequence of varying fluvial clastic nput。In Nemec W,Steel RJ,eds。Fan deltas。Springer-Verlag, 1988,23-49
[139]P.Weomer,H.W。Posamentier。Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy-Recent Developments and Applications AAPG Memoir,1994,58:1-484
[140]Joachim WE,Amthor and JOS Okkerman。Influence of early diagenesis on reservoir quality of rotliegende sandstones,northern nether lands。AAPG Bullet,1998,82(12):2246-2265
[141]Housknecher D.W。Assessing the relation importance of compaction processes and cementation reduction of porosity in sandstone。AAPG Bullet,1987,71(6):633-642
[142]Mitchum R.M。Glossary of Terns Used in Seismic Stratigraphy In Seismic Stretigraphy-Applicati ons to Hydrocarbon Exploration。AAPG Memoir 26,1977,205-212
[143]Van wagoner L C,etc, An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definit ion, In C.K.wilgus etc。sea-level changes:An intergrated approach,SEPM publication。1988, 4(2): 39-45
[144] T.A。Cross and MA。Lessenger, Sediment Volume Partitioning: Re tionale for Stratigraphic M odel Evaluation and High-Resoloution Stratigraphic Corre lation [R]。Accepred for publication in Norw egian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume,July,1996
[145] Rodrigo Dias Limal,Luiz Fernando De Ros。The role of depositional seting and diagenesis on the reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimoes Basin,Brazilian Amazonia[J]。Marine and Petroleum Geology,2002,19:1047-1071
[146] Y Le Gallo,Bildstein,etc。Coupled reaction-flow modeling of diagenetic changes in reservoir permeability,porosity and mineral compositions [J]。Journal of Hydrology,1998,(209):366-388
[147]Dixon S。A, Summers D。M, Surdam R。C。Diagenesis and preservation of porosity in norphlet formation (Upper Jurassic) southern alabama[J]。AAPG,1989,73(6):707-728
[148]Surdan R.C, Crossey Laura J, Hagen E Seven。Organic-inorganic interaction and sandstone diagensis[J]。AAPG,1989,73(1):1-23
[149]Schmidt V.M,cdonaid D.A。Secondary Reservoir Porosity in Sandstone。AAPG,1979,63(12): 41-51
[2]戴启德,纪友亮。油气储层地质学。石油大学出版社,1996,1:43-44
[3]邸世祥。中国碎屑岩储集层的孔隙结构。西北大学出版社,1991,78-85
[4]王治华。青阳岔油田长2段砂岩油藏储层特征研究。应用技术,2006,5(10):5-6
[5]王琪等。鄂尔多斯盆地西部三叠系长2油层组砂岩成岩演化特征[J]。天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):261-267
[6]张丽娟,李多丽,孙玉善,程明。库车坳陷西部古近纪-白垩系沉积储层特征分析。天然气地球科学。2006,17(3):355-360
[7]邓荣敬,徐备,漆家福等。北塘凹陷古近系沙河街组三段沉积特征及储层的影响因素。岩石矿物学杂志。2006,25(3):230-236
[8]裘亦楠,薛叔浩。油气储层评价技术第一版。北京,石油工业出版社,1994,53-66, 243-244
[9]冯增昭。沉积岩石学。第二版。北京:石油工业出版社,1993,97-131, 145--164
[10]中国石油天然气总公司科技发展局。中国油气储层研究论文集。北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[11]朱陆忠,赵秀梅,王春喜。十屋断陷成岩作用及储层评价。天然气工业,2000, 20(增刊);30-33
[12]刘吉余,尹万泉,邱莎。曙22块杜家台油层沉积特征。大庆石油学院学报,1998, 22(3)- 74-79
[13]吕晓光,赵永胜,史晓波。储层分类方法的应用及评价。大庆石油地质与开发,1995, 14(3): 11-15
[14]强子同,碳酸盐岩储层地质学。东营:石油大学出版社,1998,347-354
[15]马良,周江羽,王旭丽,揭异新,邱玉超,苗红波,李楠。伊通盆地岔路河断陷始新统地层对比。石油实验地质,2008,30(3):260-264
[16]贾倩,赵彦超,方度,苗红波。伊通盆地岔路河断陷地层水化学特征与油气保存关系。地质科技情报。2008,27(2):63-67
[17]贾倩。伊通地堑岔路河断陷流体识别及油气藏分布研究。武汉:中国地质大学硕士学位论文,2008
[18]王剑,徐翔军,陈秀艳,李本才,王伟涛。伊通地堑岔路河断陷南段构造—沉积特征与油气藏类型。世界地质。2007,26(2):240-244
[19]李本才,刘鸿友,杜怀旭,纪洪永,孙凯,张五一。伊通盆地含油气系统与油气藏。中国石油勘探。2003,8(3):38-44
[20]梁春秀,魏志平,李本才,盛久斌。伊兰—伊通盆地输导体系与油气运聚。天然气工业。2002,22(1):31-32
[21]侯德艳,魏魁生,李本才,赵霞。伊通盆地岔路河地区早第三纪层序地层模式与隐蔽圈闭预测。大庆石油地质与开发。2006,25(4):9-12
[22]孙万军,刘宝柱,李本才,宋立中。伊通地堑断层系统与构造样式。现代地质。2004,18(4):505-509
[23]周恒涛,杜怀旭,闫丽萍,许圣传,马启龙,朱建峰。伊通盆地岔路河断陷始新统岩性圈闭研究。世界地质。2006,25(4):396-400
[24]严杰,陈红汉,丰勇,王立武,江涛,苗洪波。伊通盆地岔路河断陷油气充注与再次运移研究。地质科技情报。2009,28(1):69-74
[25]王旭丽,周江羽,马良,揭异新,苗洪波,邱玉超,李楠。伊通盆地岔路河断陷重力流沉积特征及油气勘探意义。石油实验地质。2008,30(1):26-31
[26]刘生国,翟永红,郭建华。塔中地区石炭系碎屑岩储层孔隙结构特征与储层评价,江汉石油学院学报,1995, 17(3): 8-12
[27]顾惠荣,贾健谊,吴伟力,陈明。东海平湖油气田下第三系平湖组储层评价。海洋石油,2002, 2:1-7
[28]周丽梅,李德发,刘文碧。大丘构造S组储层孔隙结构特征及储层评价。矿物岩石,1999,19(2):47-51
[29]刘为付,刘双龙,孙立新,张永清,苗洪波。大港枣园油田孔二段储层综合评价。大庆石油学院学报,2000,24(3): 5-7
[30]赖内克H.E,辛格I.B。陆源碎屑岩沉积环境。北京:石油工业出版社。1979,222-262
[31]王振奇,张昌民等,安棚深层系扇三角洲低渗致密砂岩储层综合评价。江汉石油学院学报,2002, 24(3):1-6
[32]罗蛰潭,王允诚。油气储集层的孔隙结构。北京;科学出版社,1986,198-206
[33]杨建业,杜美利,苏小鹏。李慧利煤层气藏的储集特征及储层评价,西安地质学院学报,1995,17(3):78-82
[34]裘亦楠,薛叔浩,应凤祥。中国陆相油气储集层。北京:石油工业出版社,1997,149-211
[35]贺伟,钟孚勋,贺承祖,冯文光。储层岩石孔隙的分形结构研究和应用。天然气工业,2000, 20(2):67-70
[36]曾伟,强平,黄继祥。川东嘉二段孔隙层下限及分类与评价,矿物岩石,1997,17(2):42 -48
[37]曾文冲。油气藏储集层测井评价技术。北京:石油工业出版社,1991,58—91,93-98
[38]马雪团。济阳坳陷车古201潜山储层综合评价。江汉石油学院学报,2002,240:23-25
[39]林承焰,侯连华,车翔飞。冷家堡油田水平井油藏岩相分析及储层评价。石油大学学报。1997,21(2):13-17
[40]阎长辉,戴达山,陈青。流动单元法评价储层的展布特征。成都理工学院学报,2002,29(1): 37-40
[41]刘孟慧,赵澄林。碎屑岩储层成岩演化模式。石油大学出版社,1993,1:77-78
[42]理查德A,沙茨英格,约翰F。乔丹主编,宋新民,罗凯,张仲宏等译。储层表征新进展。北京::石油工业出版社,2002,1:43-52
[43]毛俊莉,张凤莲,鞠俊成。辽河盆地西部凹陷鸳双地区沙二段储层评价及有利储层预测。古地理学报,2001,3(3):76-83
[44]穆龙新,贾爱林,陈亮等。储层精细研究方法-国内外露头储层和现代沉积及精细地质建模。石油工业出版社,2000,1:43-45
[45]庞雯,赵靖舟。塔北隆起三叠系储层评价及储盖组合。西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(2):1-6
[46]沙文武,邵江,郭耀华。镇泾地区三叠系延长组储层评价。天然气工业,2001,21(增刊):36-42
[47]王永兴,刘玉洁,卢宏等。高孔隙度砂岩储层中砂体成因类型、孔隙结构与渗透率的关系。大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(1):12-16
[48]阎长辉,戴达山,陈青。流动单元法评价储层的展布特征。成都理工学院学报,2002, 29(1):36-40
[49]张人雄,邓志展,毛中源等。焉耆盆地宝浪油田低孔低渗储集层孔隙结构特征。新疆石油地质,1998,19(6):485-489
[50]赵约华,王敏。双河油田储层结构特征分类及影响因素。石油学报,1994,15(4):31-39
[51]朱陆忠,赵秀梅,王春喜。十屋断陷成岩作用及储层评价。天然气工业,2000,20(增刊): 30-35
[52]朱建伟,刘招君,董清水。松辽盆地层序地层格架及油气聚集规律。石油地球物理勘探, 2001,36(3):339-344
[53]中国石油天然气总公司勘探局编,赵澄林著。储层沉积学。北京:石油工业出版社,1998, 17-19
[54]董清水。伊通盆地莫里青断陷双阳组储层特征与形成机理,博士论文
[55]雍世和,洪有密测井资料综合解释与数字处理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982,9-10
[56]郎丰吉,刘江,孙树文等。阵列感应测井在疑难储层开发中的应用[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):87-89
[57]宋渝新,张君劫,杨宏等。综合利用测井资料评价油气层[J]。新疆石油地质,2006,27(1):96-98
[58]张莉,孙宏智,张美玲等。应用阵列感应资料对复杂侵入现象的解释[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(4):99-100
[59]王方雄,苏坚。电阻率和孔隙度测井曲线重盈法的新应用[J]。江汉石油学院学报,2001(23)增刊:69-70
[60]杨碧松。低矿化度地层水地层油气水层识别研究[J]。天然气工业,2000,20(2):42-44
[61]樊政军,赵冬梅,蔺学漫。复杂碎屑岩储层的流体性质判别方法研究[J]。天然气工业(地质与勘探)2007,27(1):47-50
[62]向树安,姜在兴,张元福。盐系地层低电阻率油层形成机理与识别一以江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组为例[J]。天然气地球科学,2006,17(4):514-517
[63]赵永刚。侧向测井和感应测井识别水层的对比分析[J].测井技术,2004,28(5):427-429
[64]郑雷清。双电法测井在低电阻率储层流体性质识别中的应用[J]。石油天然气学报,2006,28(3):304-306
[65]郑雷清,杨斌,赵海燕等。吐哈盆地特低孔渗性砂岩储层侧井评价方法[J]。吐哈油气,2006,11(4):368-372
[66]闫家宁,刘兴周,王庆魁等。自来屯油田低阻油层测井识别技术研究[J]。河南石油,2004,18(5):17-20
[67]刘英才,余国义,韩桂芹等。阿达油田低阻、低对比油层的成因与识别[J]。江汉石油学院,2003,25(3):8-9
[68]闫磊,潘保芝,莫修文等。几种评价低阻储层的导电模型[J]。吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(增刊):121-125
[69]谭廷栋。测井解释发现油气层[J]。天然气工业(地质勘探),2000,20(6):47-50
[70]邵春华。吐哈油田稠油层低阻成因分析及测井识别方法[J]。吐哈油气,2006,11(4):373-376
[71]王贺林,申本科,陈景萍。自然伽马能谱测井对砂砾岩地层的精细划分[J]。石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(增刊):127-132
[72]代建华,李绍霞。自然伽马能谱测井在东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩体中的应用[J]。油气地质与采收率,2004,11(4):78-80
[73]吴春文,赵文杰,柏强。自然伽马能谱测井在砂砾岩油藏中的应用[J]。测井技术,2005,29(1):46-48
[74]张丽艳,才巨宏,陈钢花。砂砾岩储集层含油性解释方法[J]。测井技术,2002,26(2):134-136
[75]常静春,郝丽萍,燕兴荣等。含砾砂岩储层岩性及流体性质判别[J]。测井技术,2005,29(3):230-232
[76]高博禹,彭仕亦,刘红歧。蒙古林砾岩油藏储层测井精细解释模型[J]。测井技术,2005,29(1):55-58
[77]刘子良。吉林油田低渗透砂岩油藏流体识别。北京:中国地质大学(北京),学位论文,2005
[78]罗蛰潭,王允诚。油气储集层的孔隙结构[M]。科学出版社,1986,21-23,124-129
[79]辛长静,何幼斌,董桂玉。毛管压力曲线在储层微观非均质性研究中的应用[J]。河南石油,2006,20(3):57-59
[80]廖明光,李士伦,谈德辉。砂岩储层渗透率与压汞曲线特征参数间的关系[J]。西南石油学院学报,2001,23(4):5-8
[81]雍世和,张超漠。测井资料处理与综合解释[M]。石油大学出版社,1996,205-214
[82]中石油勘探与生产公司。低阻油气藏测井识别评价方法与技术[M]。北京石油工业出版社,2006,72-77
[83]唐文生,符晓颖,白丽等。后期水侵型复杂断切岩性油藏评价[J]。测井技术,2000,24(1):36-41
[84]楼章华,金爱民,朱蓉等。松辽盆地油田地下水化学场的垂直分带性与平面分区性[J]。地质科学,2006,41(3):392-403
[85]王永春。伊通地堑含油气系统与油气成藏[M]。第一版,北京:石油工业出版社,2001,168-169
[86]刘斌,黄郑,龙国清等。低渗透储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响[J]。特种油气藏,2005,12(3):18—21
[87]牟汉生,姜在兴,邱隆伟等。东营凹陷现河地区沙三段下亚段储层成岩作用[J]。油气地质与采收率,2007,14(4):50-52
[88]杨占宝。郯庐断裂带中新生代演化与含油气盆地形成分布综述[J]。地质力学学报,2006,12(1):43-48,70
[89]孟元林,王志国,杨俊生等。成岩作用过程综合模拟及其应用[J]。石油实验地质,2003,25(2):211-215,220
[90]穆曙光,张以明。成岩作用及阶段对碎屑岩储层孔隙演化的控制[J]。西南石油学院学报,1994,16(3):22-27
[91]李忠,李蕙生。东濮凹陷深部次生孔隙成因与储层演化研究[J]。地质科学,1994,29(3): 267-275
[92]郑秀才。鄂尔多斯盆地中部马五4亚段成岩作用及储集性能[J]。西安地质学院学报,1996,18(1):43-49
[93]尹燕义,王国娟,张学汝等。冷家油田储层成岩作用及对孔隙演化的影响[J]。断块油气田,1996,3(3):29-32
[94]刘玉洁,王永兴。茂兴地区扶-杨油层碎屑岩储层非均质性及孔隙演化模式[J]。大庆石油学院学报,1994,18(4):19-22
[95]谢继容。砂岩次生孔隙形成机制[J]。天然气勘探与开发,2000,23(1):52-55,51
[96]刘林玉,陈刚,柳益群等。碎屑岩储集层溶蚀型次生孔隙发育的影响因素分析[J]。沉积学报,1998,16(2):97-101
[97]余成林,李相明,彭寿昌等。安塞油田南部侏罗系延8～延9储层特征及控制因素研究[J]。河南石油,2005,19(6):1-3
[98]赵永刚,陈景山,蒋裕强等。川中公山庙油田中侏罗统沙溪庙组一段储层特征及控制因素[J]。天然气勘探与开发,2006,29(1):10-16,23
[99]庞雯,郭德运,赵靖舟等。鄂尔多斯盆地甘谷驿油田东区长6油层储层特征及储层评价[J]。兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(5):96-99
[100]王振奇,何贞铭,徐龙等。鄂尔多斯盆地葫芦河地区三叠系延长组低渗致密砂岩储层特征研究[J]。江汉石油学院学报,1998,20(2):27-32,37
[101]李凤杰,王多云,徐旭辉。鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组储层特征及影响因素分析[J]。石油实验地质,2005,27(4):365-370
[102]杨铭辉,郭力,赵洪涛等。松辽盆地南部东南隆起区储层特征[J]。石油实验地质,2006,28(4):330-334
[103]李捷,王海云。东北晚中生代断陷盆地储层次生孔隙形成机制[J]。沉积学报,1999,17(4): 591-595
[104]张忠民,朱伟,赵澄林等。辽河盆地下第三系深部碎屑岩储层次生孔隙演化模式及其分布[J]。大庆石油学院学报,2002,26(3):12-14
[105]李义军。浅述次生孔隙的成因[J]。西北地质,2002,35(1):65-69
[106]崔勇,赵澄林。深层砂岩次生孔隙的成因及其与异常超压泄漏的关系—以黄骅坳陷板桥凹陷板中地区滨Ⅳ油组为例[J]。成都理工学院学报,2002,29(1):49-52
[107]马艳萍,刘立,闫建萍等。松辽盆地齐家-古龙凹陷扶杨油层次生孔隙特征及其与烃类侵位的关系[J]。世界地质,2003,22(1):36-40
[108]邱隆伟,姜在兴,陈文学等。一种新的储层孔隙成因类型—石英溶解型次生孔隙[J]。沉积学报,2002,20(4):621-627
[109]蒋凌志,顾家裕,郭彬程。中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征及形成机理[J]。沉积学报,2004,22(1):13-18
[110]李云省,邓鸿斌,吕国祥等。储层微观非均质性的分形特征研究[J]。天然气工业,2002,22(1):37-40
[111]蔡毅,魏萍等。储层微观孔隙结构特征空间展布研究方法[J]。石油学报,1994,15(增刊):76-81
[112]陈杰,周改英,赵喜亮等。储层岩石孔隙结构特征研究方法综述[J]。特种油气藏,2005,12(4):11-14
[113]郭巍,刘彦杰,王建功等。松辽盆地英台地区储层砂岩体微观结构特征研究[J]。长春科技大学学报,1998,28(2):162-165,175
[114]肖亮,刘晓鹏,陈兆明等。核磁毛管压力曲线构造方法综述[J]。断块油气田,2007,14(2): 86-88
[115]库丽曼,刘树根,朱平等。成岩作用对致密砂岩储层物性的影响—以川中地区上三叠统须四段气藏为例[J]。天然气工业,2007,27(1):33-36
[116]贾存富,蒋龙。恳东521储层物性特征[J]。内蒙古石油化工,2007,(2):113-114
[117]李兴国,孙春红,赵云飞。喇嘛甸油田储层微观结构特征变化规律研究[J]。大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(1):79-82
[118]唐海发,彭仕宓,赵彦超等。致密砂岩储层物性的主控因素分析[J]。西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(1):59-63
[119]陈鹃,黄郑,龙国清等。宝浪油田储层沉积微相及非均质性特征[J]。西部探矿工程,2005,(9):53-54
[120]郑浚茂,于兴河,谢承强等。不同沉积环境储层的层内非均质性—以黄骅坳陷为例[J]。现代地质,1995,9(4):501-508
[121]裘亦楠,许仕策,肖敬修等。沉积方式与碎屑岩储层的层内非均质性[J]。石油学报,1985,6(1):41-49
[122]刘顺生,胡复唐。洪积扇砾岩储层非均质性及非均质模型[J]。新疆石油地质,1993,14(4): 350-356
[123]鲜本忠,吴战国,姜在兴等。早期成岩作用研究进展及发展方向[J]。石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(6):133-139
[124]李世银。惠民凹陷商25断块沙四段沉积体系时空展布与储层特征研究[C]。中国科学院,2007
[125]赵国泉。吉林油田岔路河断陷下第三系沉积岩石学及含油性研究[C]。中国地质大学,2002
[126]薛良清,GallowayWE。扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲与三角洲体系的分类[J]。地质学报,1991,65(2):141-153
[127]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆?阈虻夭慊济娴氖侗稹⒍员燃际跫坝τ肹J]。石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-184
[128]赵红格,刘池洋。物源分析方法及研究进展[J]。沉积学报,2003,21(3):309-413
[129]王良忱,张金亮著。沉积环境和沉积相[M]。石油工业出版社,1996
[130]闫义,林舸,王岳军等。盆地陆源碎屑沉积物对源区构造背景的指示意义[J]。地球科学进展,2002,17(1):85-90
[131]马明侠,马金龙。松辽盆地两江地区沉积体系分布规律[J]。大庆石油地质与发,2000,19(3):4～6
[132]刘建清,赖兴运等。成岩作用的研究现状及展望[M]。石油实验地质,2006
[133]吕晓光,赵永胜,史晓波。储层分类方法的应用及评价[J]。大庆石油地质与发,1995,14(3): 11-15
[134]康安,王贵文。陆相坳陷型和断陷型湖盆层序地层样式探讨[J]。沉积学报,2003,31(2):283～287
[135]高淑梅,粱长宽,周文革。毛管压力相对渗透率曲线在二连地区的应用[J]。测井技术,2002,26(1):64-67
[136]H.G。Reading,Sedimentary Environments:Processes,Facies and Stratigraphy,1996,494-495
[137]John G,Mcpherson,etal。Fan deltas and braid deltas:conceptual problems。In: NemecW,Steel Rl,eds。Fan deltas。Springer-Verlag,1988,14-22
[138]Orton GJ。A Spectrum of Middle Ordovician fan delta and braid plain deltas,North Wales:a consequence of varying fluvial clastic nput。In Nemec W,Steel RJ,eds。Fan deltas。Springer-Verlag, 1988,23-49
[139]P.Weomer,H.W。Posamentier。Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy-Recent Developments and Applications AAPG Memoir,1994,58:1-484
[140]Joachim WE,Amthor and JOS Okkerman。Influence of early diagenesis on reservoir quality of rotliegende sandstones,northern nether lands。AAPG Bullet,1998,82(12):2246-2265
[141]Housknecher D.W。Assessing the relation importance of compaction processes and cementation reduction of porosity in sandstone。AAPG Bullet,1987,71(6):633-642
[142]Mitchum R.M。Glossary of Terns Used in Seismic Stratigraphy In Seismic Stretigraphy-Applicati ons to Hydrocarbon Exploration。AAPG Memoir 26,1977,205-212
[143]Van wagoner L C,etc, An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definit ion, In C.K.wilgus etc。sea-level changes:An intergrated approach,SEPM publication。1988, 4(2): 39-45
[144] T.A。Cross and MA。Lessenger, Sediment Volume Partitioning: Re tionale for Stratigraphic M odel Evaluation and High-Resoloution Stratigraphic Corre lation [R]。Accepred for publication in Norw egian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume,July,1996
[145] Rodrigo Dias Limal,Luiz Fernando De Ros。The role of depositional seting and diagenesis on the reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimoes Basin,Brazilian Amazonia[J]。Marine and Petroleum Geology,2002,19:1047-1071
[146] Y Le Gallo,Bildstein,etc。Coupled reaction-flow modeling of diagenetic changes in reservoir permeability,porosity and mineral compositions [J]。Journal of Hydrology,1998,(209):366-388
[147]Dixon S。A, Summers D。M, Surdam R。C。Diagenesis and preservation of porosity in norphlet formation (Upper Jurassic) southern alabama[J]。AAPG,1989,73(6):707-728
[148]Surdan R.C, Crossey Laura J, Hagen E Seven。Organic-inorganic interaction and sandstone diagensis[J]。AAPG,1989,73(1):1-23
[149]Schmidt V.M,cdonaid D.A。Secondary Reservoir Porosity in Sandstone。AAPG,1979,63(12): 41-51
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |