用户名: 密码: 验证码:
湘西烟区翻压不同绿肥品种的生态和烤烟效应
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
为探讨不同绿肥作物改良土壤和提高肥力的作用,研究了5个绿肥品种翻压的生态效应及烤烟生长、经济性状、烟叶品质效应。结果表明:(1)绿肥当季干草产量为2.28 t/hm~2~4.07t/hm~2,全部翻压入土能提供944.51 kg/hm~2~1613.76 kg/hm~2有机碳、93.59 kg/hm~2~201.31 kg/hm~2氮、11.86 kg/hm~2~22.41 kg/hm~2磷、80.99 kg/hm~2~118.19 kg/hm~2钾;连续3年绿肥翻压后植烟土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量可分别提高1.82 g/kg~3.62g/kg、0.04 g/kg~0.10g/kg、0.04 g/kg~0.12g/kg、0.34 g/kg~1.14g/kg、28.00 mg/kg~47.00mg/kg、4.40 mg/kg~43.10mg/kg、31.00 mg/kg~353.00mg/kg,具有良好的生态效应和明显的土壤改良培肥效果。(2)翻压豆科绿肥能改善烤烟农艺性状,提高烤烟根系覆盖范围和增加主、侧根重量。(3)绿肥翻压可提高烤烟产量227.10 kg/hm~2~727.80 kg/hm~2,增加烤烟产值3912.00元/hm~2~14470.65元/hm~2。(4)绿肥翻压主要影响上部烟叶化学成分和评吸质量,适宜的翻压量可提高烟叶化学成分协调性和烟叶评吸质量。湘西烟区应推广箭舌豌豆作为冬种绿肥较好。
Field experiment on green manures was conducted to study the ecological effect and hence its effect on tobacco growth, economic character, and tobacco quality. Results showed that(1) Ploughing back green manures had good ecological effect and effect of soil improvement and fertility. It could offer soil nutrients like organic C, N, P, K by 944.51 ~ 1613.76 kg/hm~2, 93.59 ~ 201.31 kg/hm~2, 11.86 ~ 22.41 kg/hm~2, 80.99 ~ 118.19 kg/hm~2 respectively and increase soil organic matter contents, i.e. total N, total P, total K, available N, available P, and available K by 1.82 ~ 3.62g/kg, 0.04 ~ 0.10g/kg, 0.04 ~ 0.12g/kg, 0.34 ~ 1.14g/kg, 28.00 ~ 47.00mg/kg, 4.40 ~ 43.10mg/kg, and 31.00 ~ 353.00mg/kg respectively after 3-year fix-point application.(2) Ploughing back green manures could improve tobacco agronomic character, increase root coverage area and weight of taproot and laterals.(3) Consecutive ploughing back green manures could increase output by 227.10 ~ 727.80 kg/hm~2 and 227.10 ~ 727.80 kg/hm~2 respectively.(4) Ploughing back green manures mainly affected chemical components and smoking quality of upper tobacco leaves, and proper overturning amount of green manures could improve harmony of chemical component and hence smoking quality. Green manures of Common vetch V proved to be suitable for Xiangxi tobacco-planting areas.
引文
[1]邓小华,周米良,田茂成,等.湘西州植烟气候与国内外主要烟区比较及相似性分析[J].中国烟草学报,2012,18(3):28-33.
    [2]邓小华,杨丽丽,周米良,等.湘西喀斯特区植烟土壤速效钾含量分布及影响因素[J].山地学报,2013,31(5):519-526.
    [3]邓小华,杨丽丽,陆中山,等.湘西烟叶质量风格特色感官评价[J].中国烟草学报,2013,19(5):22-27.
    [4]石屹,姜鹏超,赵兵,等.有机肥料定位还田对烟叶品质及土壤性状的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2009,30(1):5-9.
    [5]王岩,刘国顺.绿肥中养分释放规律及叶烟叶品质的影响[J].土壤学报,2006,43(2):273-278.
    [6]程森,吴家森,王平,等.绿肥、鸡粪和钙肥使用对新垦红壤土壤肥力和烟草生长的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2008,10(14):39-44.
    [7]覃勇,杨丽丽,邓小华,等.绿肥还田量对烤烟生长发育和产质量的影响[J].天津农业科学,2015,21(2):119-122.
    [8]胡颖梅.不同绿肥品种改良烟田土壤研究[J].陕西农业科学,2011(5):50-53.
    [9]徐祥玉,王海明,袁家富,等.不同绿肥对土壤肥力质量及其烟叶产质量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(13):58-61.
    [10]刘国顺,罗贞宝,王岩,等.绿肥翻压对烟田土壤理化性状及土壤微生物量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(1):95-98.
    [11]邓小华,石楠,周米良,等.不同种类绿肥翻压对植烟土壤理化性状的影响[J].烟草科技,2015,48(2):7-10.
    [12]潘福霞,鲁剑巍,刘威,等.不同种类绿肥翻压对土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(6):1359-1364.
    [13]罗玲,余君山,秦铁伟,等.绿肥不同翻压年限对植烟土壤理化性状及烤烟品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(24):13217-13219.
    [14]徐祥玉,王海明,袁家富,等.不同绿肥对土壤肥力质量及其烟叶产质量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(13):58-61.
    [15]敬海霞,曹安全,张登荣,等.翻压绿肥对烤烟大田生长及烤后烟产值效益的影响[J].中国农学通报2013,29(1):155-159.
    [16]刘国,王树林,沙富云,等.长期绿肥还田对烤烟产质量及土壤改良的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(04):173-177.
    [17]黄平娜,秦道珠,龙怀玉,等.绿肥还田对烟田土壤培肥和烤烟产量品质的作用[J].土壤通报,2010,41(2):379-382.
    [18]邓小华,周冀衡,陈新联,等.湘南烟区烤烟内在质量量化分析与评价[J].烟草科技,2007,(8):12-16.
    [19]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].中国农业科技出版社,2000.
    [20]邓小华,周冀衡,李晓忠,等.湖南烤烟化学成分特征及其相关性研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,38(1):18-22.
    [21]邓小华,周冀衡,李晓忠,等.湘南烟区烤烟常规化学指标的对比分析[J].烟草科技,2006(9):22-26.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700