移栽方式对烤烟土壤根际微生物的影响
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Transplanting methods on tobacco rhizosphere microorganisms
- 论文作者：郭振楠 ; 刘琳 ; 刘建宾 ; 李明权 ; 王振存 ; 贺国强 ; 李恒全
- 英文论文作者：Guo Zhennan ; Liu Lin ; Liu Jianbin ; Li Mingquan ; Wang Zhencun ; He Guoqiang ; Li Hengquan ; Mudanjiang Tobacco Science Research Institute ; Mudanjiang Tobacco Leaf Cooperation ; Binxian Branch of Harbin Tobacco Leaf Cooperation ; Jixian Branch of Harbin Tobacco Leaf Cooperation ; Tangyuan of Harbin Tobacco Leaf Cooperation
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：牡丹江烟草科学研究所;牡丹江烟叶公司;哈尔滨烟叶公司宾县分公司;哈尔滨烟叶公司集贤分公司;哈尔滨烟叶公司汤原分公司;
- 论文关键词：烤烟 ; 移栽方式 ; 根际微生物
- 英文论文关键词：flue-curing tobacco ; transplanting method ; rhizosphere microorganism
- 会议召开时间：2016-12-01
- 会议录名称：中国烟草学会2016年度优秀论文汇编——烟草农业主题
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：S572;S154.3
- 学会代码：ZGYG
- 学会名称：中国烟草学会
- 页数：5
- 文件大小：1511k
- 原文格式：D
摘要
为探索龙江特色优质烤烟的移栽方式,研究了4种移栽方式对烤烟土壤根际微生物的影响。结果表明,高茎壮苗移栽、井窖式移栽、移栽机移栽烤烟土壤根际微生物数高于常规地膜移栽,特别是高茎壮苗深栽和井窖式移栽对烤烟土壤根际微生物数量的增加幅度较大。与常规地膜移栽相比,高茎壮苗深栽烤烟土壤在不同生育期的根际细菌数量增幅达42-139%,根际放线菌增幅达27-110%,根际真菌增幅达100-300%。井窖式移栽烤烟土壤在生育期的根际细菌数量增幅达10-319%,根际放线菌增幅达8-230%,根际真菌增幅达69-230%。研究表明,高茎壮苗深栽和井窖式移栽能提高烤烟土壤根际微生物数量。
[Objective]To for explore the way suitable of transplanting tobacco in Longjiang area and study the effects of different transplanting methods on soil rhizosphere microorganisms of the flue-cured tobacco.[Method]Selection of high seedling transplanting, well cellar type transplanting, conventional plastic covering transplant, transplanter transplanting four types transplant methods.Use triphenyl tetrazolium chloride(TTC) and Microbial dilution plate culture method determination dynamic changes of root activity and soil microbial quantity in different growth stages of flue-cured tobacco after transplanting.[Result]The root activity of soil in different transplanting methods was significantly different in the whole flue cured tobacco growth period. Different transplanting methods of tobacco soil rhizosphere microorganisms are the bacteria absolute advantage, actinomycetes secondly, fungi at least.And the total number of microorganisms in different stages of treatment was not consistent, and the differences were significant.[Conclusion]Through the experiment that Longjiang area selection of high seedling transplanting and the well cellar type transplanting can improve the root activity and the number of soil microorganisms, so as to create a good micro ecological environment for the growth of flue-cured tobacco.
[Objective]To for explore the way suitable of transplanting tobacco in Longjiang area and study the effects of different transplanting methods on soil rhizosphere microorganisms of the flue-cured tobacco.[Method]Selection of high seedling transplanting, well cellar type transplanting, conventional plastic covering transplant, transplanter transplanting four types transplant methods.Use triphenyl tetrazolium chloride(TTC) and Microbial dilution plate culture method determination dynamic changes of root activity and soil microbial quantity in different growth stages of flue-cured tobacco after transplanting.[Result]The root activity of soil in different transplanting methods was significantly different in the whole flue cured tobacco growth period. Different transplanting methods of tobacco soil rhizosphere microorganisms are the bacteria absolute advantage, actinomycetes secondly, fungi at least.And the total number of microorganisms in different stages of treatment was not consistent, and the differences were significant.[Conclusion]Through the experiment that Longjiang area selection of high seedling transplanting and the well cellar type transplanting can improve the root activity and the number of soil microorganisms, so as to create a good micro ecological environment for the growth of flue-cured tobacco.
引文
[1]杨志和.不同移栽方式对南平烟区烤烟K326产量和质量的影响[J],南方农业学报,2015,46,(3):401-407.
[2]张强,魏钦平,齐鸿雁,等.北京果园土壤营养状况和微生物种群调查分析[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(17):162-167.
[3]陈华癸,陈文新等.土壤微生物学,上海科学出版社,1981:121-353.
[4]朱丽霞,,章家恩,刘文高.根系分泌物与根际微生物相互作用研究综述.[J].生态环境,2003,12(1):102-105.
[5]Elsgaard L,Petersen S O,Debosz K.Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in agricultural soil.1.Short-term effects on soil microbiology[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2001,20(8):1656-1663.
[6]Filip Z.International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2002,88(2):689-712.
[7]张鹏程,陆引罡等,不同移栽方式对烤烟田间长势和产质影响的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(35):11491,11516.
[8]Gomez E,Ferreras L,Toresani S.Soil bacterial functional diversity as yinfluenced by organic amendment application[J].Bioresource Technology,2006,97(13):1484-1489.
[9]Riley D,Barber S A.Bicarbonate accumulation and p H changes at the soybean(Glycine max(L.)Merr.)root-soil interface.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1969,33(6):905-908.
[10]Riley D,Barber S A.Salt accumulation at the soybean(Glycine max(L.)Merr.)root-soil interface.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1970,34(1):154-155.
[11]Nihorimbere V,Ongena M,Smargiassi M,Thonart P.Beneficial effect of the rhizosphere microbial community for plant growth and health.Biotechnology,Agronomy,Society and Environment,2011,15(2):327-337.
[12]Richardson A E,Barea J M,Mc Neill A M,Prigent-Combaret C.Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms.Plant and Soil,2009,321(1-2):305-339.
[13]Morgan J A,Bending G D,White P J.Biological costs and benefits to plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere.Journal of Experimental Botany,2005,56(417):1729-1739.
[14]陈文新.土壤与环境微生物北京农业大学出版社,1990:202一209.
[15]Lynch J P.Root architecture and plant productivity.Plant Physilogy,1995,109(1):7-13.
[16]Elsgaard L,Petersen S O,Debosz K.Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in agricultural soil.1.Short-term effects on soil microbiology[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2001,20(8):1656-1663.
[17]Filip Z.International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2002,88(2):689-712.
[18]Paparizas G C,Davey C D.Extent and naure of the rhizosphere[J].Lupinus,Plant and Soil,1961,14:215-236.
[19]史宏志,陈炳,刘国顺,等.不同覆盖措施的保水效果及对烟叶产质的影响[J].河南农业科学,2007(11):47-50.
[20]黄刚,王发鹏,丁福章,等.不同保水措施对烟地土壤水分及烤烟生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(9):265-268.
[21]张艳玲,蔡宪杰,王信民.烟田土壤微生物组成及其垂直分布特征[J].烟草科技,2006(9):61-64.
[22]吴凤芝,王学征.设施黄瓜连作和轮作中土壤微生物群落多样性的变化及其与产量品质的关系[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(10):2274-2280.
[23]雍太文,杨文钰,向达兵,等.不同种植模式对作物根系生长产量及根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1):125-132.
[24]章家恩,高爱霞,徐华勤,等.玉米/花生间作对土壤微生物和土壤养分状况的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(7):1597-1602.
[2]张强,魏钦平,齐鸿雁,等.北京果园土壤营养状况和微生物种群调查分析[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(17):162-167.
[3]陈华癸,陈文新等.土壤微生物学,上海科学出版社,1981:121-353.
[4]朱丽霞,,章家恩,刘文高.根系分泌物与根际微生物相互作用研究综述.[J].生态环境,2003,12(1):102-105.
[5]Elsgaard L,Petersen S O,Debosz K.Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in agricultural soil.1.Short-term effects on soil microbiology[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2001,20(8):1656-1663.
[6]Filip Z.International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2002,88(2):689-712.
[7]张鹏程,陆引罡等,不同移栽方式对烤烟田间长势和产质影响的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(35):11491,11516.
[8]Gomez E,Ferreras L,Toresani S.Soil bacterial functional diversity as yinfluenced by organic amendment application[J].Bioresource Technology,2006,97(13):1484-1489.
[9]Riley D,Barber S A.Bicarbonate accumulation and p H changes at the soybean(Glycine max(L.)Merr.)root-soil interface.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1969,33(6):905-908.
[10]Riley D,Barber S A.Salt accumulation at the soybean(Glycine max(L.)Merr.)root-soil interface.Soil Science Society of America Journal,1970,34(1):154-155.
[11]Nihorimbere V,Ongena M,Smargiassi M,Thonart P.Beneficial effect of the rhizosphere microbial community for plant growth and health.Biotechnology,Agronomy,Society and Environment,2011,15(2):327-337.
[12]Richardson A E,Barea J M,Mc Neill A M,Prigent-Combaret C.Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms.Plant and Soil,2009,321(1-2):305-339.
[13]Morgan J A,Bending G D,White P J.Biological costs and benefits to plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere.Journal of Experimental Botany,2005,56(417):1729-1739.
[14]陈文新.土壤与环境微生物北京农业大学出版社,1990:202一209.
[15]Lynch J P.Root architecture and plant productivity.Plant Physilogy,1995,109(1):7-13.
[16]Elsgaard L,Petersen S O,Debosz K.Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in agricultural soil.1.Short-term effects on soil microbiology[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2001,20(8):1656-1663.
[17]Filip Z.International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2002,88(2):689-712.
[18]Paparizas G C,Davey C D.Extent and naure of the rhizosphere[J].Lupinus,Plant and Soil,1961,14:215-236.
[19]史宏志,陈炳,刘国顺,等.不同覆盖措施的保水效果及对烟叶产质的影响[J].河南农业科学,2007(11):47-50.
[20]黄刚,王发鹏,丁福章,等.不同保水措施对烟地土壤水分及烤烟生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(9):265-268.
[21]张艳玲,蔡宪杰,王信民.烟田土壤微生物组成及其垂直分布特征[J].烟草科技,2006(9):61-64.
[22]吴凤芝,王学征.设施黄瓜连作和轮作中土壤微生物群落多样性的变化及其与产量品质的关系[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(10):2274-2280.
[23]雍太文,杨文钰,向达兵,等.不同种植模式对作物根系生长产量及根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1):125-132.
[24]章家恩,高爱霞,徐华勤,等.玉米/花生间作对土壤微生物和土壤养分状况的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(7):1597-1602.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |