用户名: 密码: 验证码:
三种植物对丹江口水库库滨新淹没农田土壤营养盐释放抑制效果
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
丹江口水库大坝增高后,水库库滨存在大面积新淹没农田,面临着营养盐释放的风险。通过室内模拟淹没实验的方式,对香根草、狗牙根、野艾蒿三种植物在淹水状态下的生长状况及对土壤中氮磷营养盐释放的抑制效果进行研究。结果表明,在长期淹水的条件下,三种植物对土壤硝态氮的释放具有非常显著的抑制作用,但对于铵态氮和总磷释放的抑制效果不明显。香根草对硝态氮释放的抑制能力最强,野艾蒿和狗牙根相对较弱。
After the heightening of Dangjiangkou reservior dam,large area of agricultural land in the shoreland may face the risk of soil nutrient release. The inhibitory effect on nitrogen and phosphrus release of three species of plants(Vetiveria, Cynodon and Artemisia) was studied through indoor simulated experiment. The results showed that in the long-term flooding condition, the three plants showed a significant inhibitory effect on the release of nitrate nitrogen, but the inhibitory effect on ammonia and total phosphrus were not significant. Vetiveria show the highest inhibiton effect on the nitrate nitrogen, while the inhibiton effect of Cynodon and Artemisia were relatively low.
引文
[1].杨胜天,王雪蕾,刘昌明,盛浩然,李茜,岸边带生态系统研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2007.27(6):p.894-905.
    [2].汤家喜,孙丽娜,孙铁珩,张鸿龄,河岸缓冲带对氮磷的截留转化及其生态恢复研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2012.21(8):p.1514-1520.
    [3].李睿华,管运涛,何苗,胡洪营,蒋展鹏,河岸混合植物带改善河水水质的现场研究[J].环境工程学报,2007.1(6):p.60-64.
    [4].谢杰,吴德意,陈雪初,孔海南等,滇池和洱海湖滨带水生植被状况与水质的关系研究[J].环境科学与技术,2013.36(002):p.55-59.
    [5].夏汉平,敖惠修,刘世忠,香根草生态工程应用于公路护坡的效益研究[J].草业科学,2002.19(1):p.52-56.
    [6].夏汉平,束文圣,香根草和百喜草对铅锌尾矿重金属的抗性与吸收差异研究[J].生态学报,2001.21(7):p.1121-1129.
    [7].王海锋,曾波,乔普,长期水淹条件下香根草,菖蒲和空心莲子草的存活及生长响应[J].生态学报,2008.28(6):p.2571-2580.
    [8].张迪,戴方喜,狗牙根群落土壤—根系系统的结构及其抗冲刷与抗侵蚀性能的空间变化.水土保持通报,2015.35(001):p.34-36.
    [9].Armstrong,W.,Aeration in higher plants.Advances in botanical research[J],1980.7:p.225-332.
    [10].Armstrong,W.,Radial oxygen losses from intact rice roots as affected by distance from the apex,respiration and waterlogging[J].Physiologia plantarum,1971.25(2):p.192-197.
    [11].李奕林,水稻根系通气组织与根系泌氧及根际硝化作用的关系.生态学报[J],2012.32(7):p.2066-2074.
    [12].Brown,M.,Rhizosphere microorganisms--opportunists,bandits or benefactors.Soil Microbiology.N.Walker,ed,1975.
    [13].Clarholm,M.,Possible roles for roots,bacteria,protozoa and fungi in supplying nitrogen to plants.Special publications series of the British Ecological Society,1985.
    [14].涂书新,孙锦荷,郭智芬,谷峰,植物根系分泌物与根际营养关系评述[J].土壤与环境,2000.9(1):p.64-67.
    [15].付海曼,贾黎明,土壤对氮,磷吸附/解吸附特性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2009.25(21):p.198-203.
    [16].张国梁,章申,农田氮素淋失研究进展[J].土壤,1998.30(6):p.291-297.
    [17].Young,E.O.and D.S.Ross,Phosphate release from seasonally flooded soils[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2001.30(1):p.91-101.
    [18].唐罗忠,生原喜久雄,户田浩人,and黄宝龙,湿地林土壤的Fe^2+,Eh及p H值的变化.生态学报,2005.25(1):p.103-107.
    [19].邹国元,张福锁,根际反硝化作用与N2O释放[J].中国农业大学学报,2002.7(1):p.77-82.
    [20].李菊梅,李生秀,可矿化氮与各有机氮组分的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003.9(2):p.158-164.
    [21].金相灿,崔哲,王圣瑞,连续淹水培养条件下沉积物和土壤的氮素矿化过程[J].土壤通报,2006.37(5):p.909-915.
    [22].田娟,刘凌,董贵明,王桂凤,淹水土壤磷释放机理研究进展[J].土壤通报,2008(2):p.426-430.
    [23].高超,张桃林,吴蔚东,氧化还原条件对土壤磷素固定与释放的影响[J].土壤学报,2002.39(4):p.542-549.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700