关于中国公共外交实践的研究——以芝加哥大学孔子学院为案例
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：The Research on China`s Public Diplomatic Practice:Focusing on the Confucius Institutes at the University of Chicago(CIUC)
- 论文作者：范强 ; 张云
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：日本国立新泻大学;
- 会议召开时间：2015-11-21
- 会议录名称：第八届全国国际关系、国际政治专业博士生学术论坛论文集
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：G648.9;D822
- 学会代码：GJZY
- 会议名称：第八届全国国际关系、国际政治专业博士生学术论坛
- 会议地点：中国北京
- 主办单位：北京大学国际关系学院、察哈尔学会、《国际政治研究》编辑部
- 学会名称：《国际政治研究》编辑部
- 页数：22
- 文件大小：200k
- 原文格式：D
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
<正>孔子学院是中国促进中文教学、促进文化交流和改善国家形象的重要公共外交举措之一。自2004年,主要通过与外方大学合作的模式中国已在全球范围建立约500所孔子学院。孔子学院获得快速发展同时,对孔子学院的负面评价也实
引文
(1)“Criticism of Confucius Institutes,”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Confucius_Institutes,2015-09-01;李开盛、戴长征:《孔子学院在美国的舆论环境评估》,《世界经济与政治》2011年第7期,第76-93页;郑永年:《中国形象工程为何适得其反》,《联合早报》2014年12月16日。
(2)The American Association of University Professors(AAUP),“On Partnerships with Foreign Governments:The Case of Confucius Institutes,”June 2014,http://www.aaup.org/report/confucius-institutes,2014-12-10;The Canadian Association of University Teachers,“The Minutes of 75th Meeting of Canadian Association of University Teachers(CAUT),”November 29-December 1,2013,http://www.caut.ca/docs/default-source/Minutes-of-meetings/75th-council-meeting-(november-2013).pdf,2014-12-10.
(3)韩召颖:《孔子学院与中国公共外交》,《公共外交季刊》第7期;韩方明:《孔子学院代表中国软实力》,《联合早报》2014年1月8日。
(4)郑永年:《中国形象工程为何适得其反》。
(5)丁学良:《中国的软实力和周边国家》,北京:东方出版社2014,第79-84页;李开盛、戴长征:《孔子学院在美国的舆论环境评估》,《世界经济与政治》2011年第7期,第76-93页;Marshall Sahlins,“China U,”The Nation,November 2013,pp.36-43;The American Association of University Professors(AAUP),“On Partnerships with Foreign Governments:The Case of Confucius Institutes”;The Canadian Association of University Teachers,“The Minutes of75th Meeting of Canadian Association of University Teachers(CAUT)”.
(1)韩召颖:《孔子学院与中国公共外交》,《公共外交季刊》第7期;刘宏:《孔子学院与中华文化的国际传播:成就与挑战》,《公共外交季刊》第13期;张西平:《简论孔子学院的软实力功能》,《世界汉语教学》2007年第3期;李期铿:《孔子学院的公共外交使命--以夏威夷大学孔子学院为例》,《公共外交季刊》第19期;韩方明:《孔子学院代表中国软实力》,《联合早报》2014年1月8日;宗焕平:《孔子7学院的独特影响力》,《瞭望》2007年第11期;李松林:《试析孔子学院文化软实力作用》,《思想教育研究》2010年第4期;于淼:《从孔子学院看汉语言文化推广的模式与效果》,《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第6期;James F.Paradise,“China and International Harmony:The Role of Confucius Institutes in Bolstering Beijing`s Soft Power,”Asian Survey,Vol.49,No.4(July/August 2009),pp.647-669;Sheng Ding and Robert A.Saunders,“Talking Up China:An Analysis of China`s Rising Cultural Power and Global Promotion of the Chinese Language,”East Asia,Summer 2006,Vol.23,No.2,pp-3-33;Joshua Kurlantzick,“China`s Charm Offensive in Southeast Asia,”Current History,Vol.105,Issue 692,September 2006,pp.270-276;Jennifer Hubbert,“Authenticating the Nation:Confucius Institutes and Soft Power,”in R.S.Zaharna et al.“Confucius Institutes and the Globalization of China’s Soft Power,”Los Angeles:Figueroa Press,September 2014,pp.33-46;Kam Louie,“Confucius the Chameleon:Dubious Envoy for‘Brand China’,”Boundary,2/Spring2011,pp.77-100;Jennifer Hubbert,“Ambiguous States:Confucius Institutes and Chinese Soft Power in the U.S.Classroom,”Political and Legal Anthropology Review,Vol.37,No.2,pp.329-349;Joe-Tin Lo and Suyan Pan,“Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power:Practices and Paradoxes,”Compare:A Journal of Comparative and International Education,DOL:10.1080/03057925.2014.916185,pp.1-21;Zhe Ren,“The Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power”,IDE Discussion Paper,NO.330,March 2012.
(2)刘程:《孔子学院国内研究现状即走向》,《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》2012年第1期,第88-92页;Joe-Tin Lo and Suyan Pan,“Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power:Practices and Paradoxes,”Compare:A Journal of Comparative and International Education,DOL:10.1080/03057925.2014.916185,pp.1-21
(3)R.S.Zaharna,“Strategic Stakeholder Engagement in Public Diplomacy,”paper presented to the International Studies Association Conference,Montreal,March 15-19,2011;Falk Harting,“Cultural Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics:The Case of Confucius Institutes in Australia,”Communication,Politics&Culture,Vol.45,pp.256-276;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.70;李炅澤『孔子学院のコントロール強化のために用いられる内部メカニズム分析:ブランド設定と語学検定テストの役割を中心に』、国際日本研究(3)、2011-03,第35-50頁;萧新煌、杨昊:《孔子学院在中国-东南亚关系政治中的角色》,《(台湾)远景基金会季刊》第15卷第3期,2014年7月,第1-56页。
(1)萧新煌、杨昊:《孔子学院在中国-东南亚关系政治中的角色》。
(2)李炅澤『孔子学院のコントロール強化のために用いられる内部メカニズム分析:ブランド設定と語学検定テストの役割を中心に』。
(1)R.S.Zaharna,“Strategic Stakeholder Engagement in Public Diplomacy,”paper presented to the International Studies Association Conference,Montreal,March 15-19,2011;Falk Harting,“Cultural Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics:The Case of Confucius Institutes in Australia,”Communication,Politics&Culture,Vol.45,pp.256-276.;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.3.
(2)Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.3.
(1)列尔:《美众议员要求国会调查孔子学院》,2014年12月14日,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/simp/world/2014/12/141205_us_china_university_ties,2014-12-23;Falk Harting,“Confucius Institutes-Quo Vadis?”December 21,2014,http://the diplomat.com/2014/12/Confucius-institutes-quo-cadis/,2015-01-05;John Sudworth,“Confucius Institute:The Hard Side of China`s Soft Power,”December22,2014,http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-30567743,2014-12-23.
(2)Maroon Editorial Board,“Communication around Confucius,”May 16,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/16/communication-around-confucius/,2014-12-10;Lear Jiang,“Maroon Scare,”October 3,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/10/03/maroon-scare/,2014-12-10;Didi Kirsten Tatlow,“University of Chicago’s Relations With Confucius Institute Sour”,September 26,2014,http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/26/university-of-chicagos-relations-with-confucius-i nstitute-sour/?module=Search&mab Reward=relbias%3As,2014-12-22;Harry Painter,“Doubts about the integrity of Confucius Institutes lead to mounting criticism,”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Confucius_Institutes,2014-12-22;Peter Foster,“China soft power set back as US universities shut second Confucius Institute in a week,”October 1,2014,http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11133921/China-soft-power-set-ba ck-as-US-universities-shut-second-Confucius-Institute-in-a-week.html,2014-12-10
(1)MFI是芝加哥大学经济系教授发起的研究机构,旨在促进芝加哥大学与全世界学者的学术交流。芝加哥大学管理层对这一机构持支持态度。2008年5月15日,芝加哥大学管理层宣布投资2亿美元组建MFI,其中大部分资金将向全球校友以及商界领袖募集。而且,管理层同时宣布,MFI以及芝加哥大学经济系将占据被认为是主校区附近黄金地带的建筑。2008年11月,该机构更名为米尔顿·弗里德曼经济研究院(Milton Friedman Institute for Research in Economics,MFIRE。以下简称MFIRE),2011年6月,该机构与贝克尔芝加哥价格理论中心(Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory)合并组成盖瑞·贝克尔、米尔顿·弗里德曼经济研究院(Gary Becker Milton Friedman Institute for Research in Economics)。
(2)该组织全名Committee for Open Research on Economy and Society,是由芝加哥大学校内部分学者组成的一个组织,2008年发起针对MFI抗议事件时成立。其主要领导人为芝加哥大学历史学教授布鲁斯·林肯(Bruce Lincoln).
(1)The CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute,”June 8,2008,http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/friedman_letter.htm,2014-12-22.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Kari Lydersen,“University's Plans for Milton Friedman Institute Spark Outcry,”August 28,2008,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/27/AR2008082703193_2.html,2014-12-22;CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute”.
(4)CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute”.
(5)Ibid.
(1)John Cochrane,“Comments on the Milton Friedman Institute Protest Letter,”July 12,2008,http:faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/friedman letter comments.htm,2014-12-10;John,Cochrane,“Raise the Right Issues,”October 14,2008,http://chicagomaroon.com/2008/10/14/raise-the-right-issues,2014-12-10.
(2)Michael Lipkin,“Faculty Senate Meets to Discuss Friedman Institute,”October 17,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2008/10/17/faculty-senate-meets-to-discuss-friedman-institute/,2014-12-22.
(3)Kari Lydersen,“University's Plans for Milton Friedman Institute Spark Outcry”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)Michael Lipkin,“Faculty Senate Meets to Discuss Friedman Institute”.
(6)Ibid.
(7)Andy Guess,“A(Slight)Name Change for Milton Friedman Institute,”November 4,2008,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/11/04/friedman,2015-01-27.
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Asher Klein,“Renovation Plans for MFI Spook Faculty,”May 21,2010,http://chicagomaroon.com/2010/5/21/mfi-renovation-plans-spook-faculty/,2015-01-29.
(4)“New Controversy over Milton Friedman Institute,”May 21,2010,https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2010/05/21/new-controversy-over-milton-friedman-in stitute,2015-01-27.
(5)The CORES,“Petition,”June 2010,https://uchicagocores.wordpress.com/petition/,2014-12-27.
(6)Ibid
(1)“New Controversy over Milton Friedman Institute”.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Ibid.
(4)Lars Peter Hansen`s comments,May 2010,http://home.uchicago.edu/~lhansen/hansen-mfi-060110.pdf,2014-12-20.
(5)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4,”June 4 2010,https://uchicagocores.wordpress.com/debate/june4_minutes/,2015-01-26.
(6)Robert Zimmer,Thomas Rosenbaum,“Faculty Engagement at the University,”June 9,2010,http://president.uchicago.edu/page/faculty-engagement-university,2014-12-10.
(7)Asher Klein,Christina Phillsbury,“MFIRE plan renews faculty clash with admin,”May 28,2010,http://chicagomaroon.com/2010/05/28/mfire-plan-renews-faculty-clash-with-admin/,2015-01-28.
(1)Robert Zimmer,Thomas Rosenbaum,“Faculty Engagement at the University”.
(2)Ibid.
(3)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(4)The CORES,“Cores Statement-June 14,”June 14,2010,http://uchicagocores.worldpress.com/debate/june14 response/,2014-12-10.
(5)Marshall Sahlins,“China U,”The Nation,November 2013,pp.36-43.
(6)Raymond Fang,“Signers of Faculty Petition Raise Concerns on Confucius Institute,”May 13,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/13/signers-of-faculty-petition-raise-concerns-on-confucius-ins titute-faculty-freedoms/,2014-12-10.
(1)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding,”April 29,2014,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/04/29/chicago-faculty-object-their-campuss-confuciu s-institute,2015-01-20.
(2)The CORES,“Petition”.
(3)芝加哥大学东亚研究中心(The Center for East Asian Studies,CEAS),是芝加哥大学校内支持东亚研究的研究机构,由中国研究委员会、日本研究委员会和韩国研究委员会组成。芝加哥大学孔子学院座落于该中心内。
(1)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(2)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(3)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April 2014.
(6)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(7)The CORES,“Petition to the Committee of the Council,”April 2014,https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCUQFj AB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.insidehighered.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Fserver_files%2Ffiles%2FChicago%2520Petition%2520re%2520Confucius%2520Institute%2520%25282%2529.docx&ei=5WXTVKTuG-G8mg WKl4GICQ&usg=AFQj CNGqrwdjt8DWBrcX FY_j Gt39f Eck2g,2014-12-10.(1)
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(4)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(5)Ibid.
(6)Ibid.
(1)Harini Jaganathan,Alice Xiao,“Confucius Institute protested by faculty,”May 2,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/02/confucius-insitute-protested-by-faculty/,2014-12-10.
(2)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》,《解放周末》2014年9月19日。
(3)同上。
(4)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(5)Raymond Fang,“Confucius Institute Board Defends Campus Presence,”June 3,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/06/03/confucius-institute-board-defends-campus-presence/,2014-12-10.
(6)Elizabeth Redden,“Confucius Controversies,”July 24,2014,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/07/24/debate-renews-over-confucius-institutes,2015-01-20.
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Ibid.
(4)Ibid.
(5)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April 2015.
(6)Ibid.
(7)Ibid.
(8)Ibid.
(1)Eleanor Hyu,“O-Issue 2014:While you were out,”http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/25/o-issue-2014-while-you-were-out/,2014-12-11.
(2)The Editorial Board,The University of Chicago Magazine,July-Aug 2014,Vol.106,No.6,pp.8.
(3)Raymond Fang,“Signers of Faculty Petition Raise Concerns on Confucius Institute”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)Elizabeth Redden,“Confucius Controversies”.
(6)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April,2015.
(1)Theodore Foss,“Chinese Studies at Chicago:A Brief History of the Origin of Chinese Studies at the University of Chicago,”https://ceas.uchicago.edu/sites/ceas.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/About/Ted_Foss_Article.pdf,2015-05-05.
(2)芝加哥大学孔子学院:《2012-2013年度报告》,第2-9页。
(3)芝加哥大学孔子学院:《2012-2013年度报告》,第2-9页;CEAS,“Grants and Fellowships,”https://ceas.uchicago.edu/page/grants-and-fellowships,2015-05-05.
(4)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(1)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》。
(2)Don Starr,“Chinese Language Education in Europe,”European Journal of Education,Vol.44,No.1,pp.65-82.
(3)The Interview with a former Director of CIs who once worked in U.S.in March 2015;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in USPublic Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,pp.72-75.
(4)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute,”September 30,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/30/university-to-end-partnership-with-confucius-institute/,2014-12-10.
(5)狄雨霏:《芝加哥大学暂停孔子学院续约谈判》,2014年9月29日,http://cn.nytimes.com/china/20140929/c29confucius/,2014-12-10。
(6)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute”.
(1)The UC,“Statement on the Confucius Institute at the University of Chicago,”http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2014/09/25/statement-confucius-institute-university-chicago#stha sh.7FSu8T8Q.dpuf,2014-12-08.
(2)The Email Interviews with Raymond Fang who is the journalist of Chicago Maroon,in April2015.
(3)Falk Harting,”Confucius Institutes and the Rise of China,”Journal of Chinese Political Science,2012,Vol.17,pp.53-76;Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(4)The Interview with a Chinese CIs director who once worked in U.S,in March 2015.
(1)Ibid.
(2)The Email Interviews with Richard Saller who is the director of Confucius Institute at Stanford University,in September 2015.
(3)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(4)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》。
(5)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute,”September 30,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/30/university-to-end-partnership-with-confucius-institute/,2014-12-10.
(6)狄雨霏:《芝加哥大学暂停孔子学院续约谈判》。
(7)G.E.,“Confucius Institutes:About Face,”September 26,2014,http://www.economists.com/blogs/analects/2014/09/confucius-institutes,2014-12-23.
(2)The American Association of University Professors(AAUP),“On Partnerships with Foreign Governments:The Case of Confucius Institutes,”June 2014,http://www.aaup.org/report/confucius-institutes,2014-12-10;The Canadian Association of University Teachers,“The Minutes of 75th Meeting of Canadian Association of University Teachers(CAUT),”November 29-December 1,2013,http://www.caut.ca/docs/default-source/Minutes-of-meetings/75th-council-meeting-(november-2013).pdf,2014-12-10.
(3)韩召颖:《孔子学院与中国公共外交》,《公共外交季刊》第7期;韩方明:《孔子学院代表中国软实力》,《联合早报》2014年1月8日。
(4)郑永年:《中国形象工程为何适得其反》。
(5)丁学良:《中国的软实力和周边国家》,北京:东方出版社2014,第79-84页;李开盛、戴长征:《孔子学院在美国的舆论环境评估》,《世界经济与政治》2011年第7期,第76-93页;Marshall Sahlins,“China U,”The Nation,November 2013,pp.36-43;The American Association of University Professors(AAUP),“On Partnerships with Foreign Governments:The Case of Confucius Institutes”;The Canadian Association of University Teachers,“The Minutes of75th Meeting of Canadian Association of University Teachers(CAUT)”.
(1)韩召颖:《孔子学院与中国公共外交》,《公共外交季刊》第7期;刘宏:《孔子学院与中华文化的国际传播:成就与挑战》,《公共外交季刊》第13期;张西平:《简论孔子学院的软实力功能》,《世界汉语教学》2007年第3期;李期铿:《孔子学院的公共外交使命--以夏威夷大学孔子学院为例》,《公共外交季刊》第19期;韩方明:《孔子学院代表中国软实力》,《联合早报》2014年1月8日;宗焕平:《孔子7学院的独特影响力》,《瞭望》2007年第11期;李松林:《试析孔子学院文化软实力作用》,《思想教育研究》2010年第4期;于淼:《从孔子学院看汉语言文化推广的模式与效果》,《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第6期;James F.Paradise,“China and International Harmony:The Role of Confucius Institutes in Bolstering Beijing`s Soft Power,”Asian Survey,Vol.49,No.4(July/August 2009),pp.647-669;Sheng Ding and Robert A.Saunders,“Talking Up China:An Analysis of China`s Rising Cultural Power and Global Promotion of the Chinese Language,”East Asia,Summer 2006,Vol.23,No.2,pp-3-33;Joshua Kurlantzick,“China`s Charm Offensive in Southeast Asia,”Current History,Vol.105,Issue 692,September 2006,pp.270-276;Jennifer Hubbert,“Authenticating the Nation:Confucius Institutes and Soft Power,”in R.S.Zaharna et al.“Confucius Institutes and the Globalization of China’s Soft Power,”Los Angeles:Figueroa Press,September 2014,pp.33-46;Kam Louie,“Confucius the Chameleon:Dubious Envoy for‘Brand China’,”Boundary,2/Spring2011,pp.77-100;Jennifer Hubbert,“Ambiguous States:Confucius Institutes and Chinese Soft Power in the U.S.Classroom,”Political and Legal Anthropology Review,Vol.37,No.2,pp.329-349;Joe-Tin Lo and Suyan Pan,“Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power:Practices and Paradoxes,”Compare:A Journal of Comparative and International Education,DOL:10.1080/03057925.2014.916185,pp.1-21;Zhe Ren,“The Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power”,IDE Discussion Paper,NO.330,March 2012.
(2)刘程:《孔子学院国内研究现状即走向》,《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》2012年第1期,第88-92页;Joe-Tin Lo and Suyan Pan,“Confucius Institutes and China`s Soft Power:Practices and Paradoxes,”Compare:A Journal of Comparative and International Education,DOL:10.1080/03057925.2014.916185,pp.1-21
(3)R.S.Zaharna,“Strategic Stakeholder Engagement in Public Diplomacy,”paper presented to the International Studies Association Conference,Montreal,March 15-19,2011;Falk Harting,“Cultural Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics:The Case of Confucius Institutes in Australia,”Communication,Politics&Culture,Vol.45,pp.256-276;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.70;李炅澤『孔子学院のコントロール強化のために用いられる内部メカニズム分析:ブランド設定と語学検定テストの役割を中心に』、国際日本研究(3)、2011-03,第35-50頁;萧新煌、杨昊:《孔子学院在中国-东南亚关系政治中的角色》,《(台湾)远景基金会季刊》第15卷第3期,2014年7月,第1-56页。
(1)萧新煌、杨昊:《孔子学院在中国-东南亚关系政治中的角色》。
(2)李炅澤『孔子学院のコントロール強化のために用いられる内部メカニズム分析:ブランド設定と語学検定テストの役割を中心に』。
(1)R.S.Zaharna,“Strategic Stakeholder Engagement in Public Diplomacy,”paper presented to the International Studies Association Conference,Montreal,March 15-19,2011;Falk Harting,“Cultural Diplomacy with Chinese Characteristics:The Case of Confucius Institutes in Australia,”Communication,Politics&Culture,Vol.45,pp.256-276.;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.3.
(2)Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in US Public Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,p.3.
(1)列尔:《美众议员要求国会调查孔子学院》,2014年12月14日,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/simp/world/2014/12/141205_us_china_university_ties,2014-12-23;Falk Harting,“Confucius Institutes-Quo Vadis?”December 21,2014,http://the diplomat.com/2014/12/Confucius-institutes-quo-cadis/,2015-01-05;John Sudworth,“Confucius Institute:The Hard Side of China`s Soft Power,”December22,2014,http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-30567743,2014-12-23.
(2)Maroon Editorial Board,“Communication around Confucius,”May 16,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/16/communication-around-confucius/,2014-12-10;Lear Jiang,“Maroon Scare,”October 3,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/10/03/maroon-scare/,2014-12-10;Didi Kirsten Tatlow,“University of Chicago’s Relations With Confucius Institute Sour”,September 26,2014,http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/26/university-of-chicagos-relations-with-confucius-i nstitute-sour/?module=Search&mab Reward=relbias%3As,2014-12-22;Harry Painter,“Doubts about the integrity of Confucius Institutes lead to mounting criticism,”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Confucius_Institutes,2014-12-22;Peter Foster,“China soft power set back as US universities shut second Confucius Institute in a week,”October 1,2014,http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11133921/China-soft-power-set-ba ck-as-US-universities-shut-second-Confucius-Institute-in-a-week.html,2014-12-10
(1)MFI是芝加哥大学经济系教授发起的研究机构,旨在促进芝加哥大学与全世界学者的学术交流。芝加哥大学管理层对这一机构持支持态度。2008年5月15日,芝加哥大学管理层宣布投资2亿美元组建MFI,其中大部分资金将向全球校友以及商界领袖募集。而且,管理层同时宣布,MFI以及芝加哥大学经济系将占据被认为是主校区附近黄金地带的建筑。2008年11月,该机构更名为米尔顿·弗里德曼经济研究院(Milton Friedman Institute for Research in Economics,MFIRE。以下简称MFIRE),2011年6月,该机构与贝克尔芝加哥价格理论中心(Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory)合并组成盖瑞·贝克尔、米尔顿·弗里德曼经济研究院(Gary Becker Milton Friedman Institute for Research in Economics)。
(2)该组织全名Committee for Open Research on Economy and Society,是由芝加哥大学校内部分学者组成的一个组织,2008年发起针对MFI抗议事件时成立。其主要领导人为芝加哥大学历史学教授布鲁斯·林肯(Bruce Lincoln).
(1)The CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute,”June 8,2008,http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/friedman_letter.htm,2014-12-22.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Kari Lydersen,“University's Plans for Milton Friedman Institute Spark Outcry,”August 28,2008,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/27/AR2008082703193_2.html,2014-12-22;CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute”.
(4)CORES,“University of Chicago Faculty Letter on The Milton Friedman Institute”.
(5)Ibid.
(1)John Cochrane,“Comments on the Milton Friedman Institute Protest Letter,”July 12,2008,http:faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/friedman letter comments.htm,2014-12-10;John,Cochrane,“Raise the Right Issues,”October 14,2008,http://chicagomaroon.com/2008/10/14/raise-the-right-issues,2014-12-10.
(2)Michael Lipkin,“Faculty Senate Meets to Discuss Friedman Institute,”October 17,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2008/10/17/faculty-senate-meets-to-discuss-friedman-institute/,2014-12-22.
(3)Kari Lydersen,“University's Plans for Milton Friedman Institute Spark Outcry”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)Michael Lipkin,“Faculty Senate Meets to Discuss Friedman Institute”.
(6)Ibid.
(7)Andy Guess,“A(Slight)Name Change for Milton Friedman Institute,”November 4,2008,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/11/04/friedman,2015-01-27.
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Asher Klein,“Renovation Plans for MFI Spook Faculty,”May 21,2010,http://chicagomaroon.com/2010/5/21/mfi-renovation-plans-spook-faculty/,2015-01-29.
(4)“New Controversy over Milton Friedman Institute,”May 21,2010,https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2010/05/21/new-controversy-over-milton-friedman-in stitute,2015-01-27.
(5)The CORES,“Petition,”June 2010,https://uchicagocores.wordpress.com/petition/,2014-12-27.
(6)Ibid
(1)“New Controversy over Milton Friedman Institute”.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Ibid.
(4)Lars Peter Hansen`s comments,May 2010,http://home.uchicago.edu/~lhansen/hansen-mfi-060110.pdf,2014-12-20.
(5)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4,”June 4 2010,https://uchicagocores.wordpress.com/debate/june4_minutes/,2015-01-26.
(6)Robert Zimmer,Thomas Rosenbaum,“Faculty Engagement at the University,”June 9,2010,http://president.uchicago.edu/page/faculty-engagement-university,2014-12-10.
(7)Asher Klein,Christina Phillsbury,“MFIRE plan renews faculty clash with admin,”May 28,2010,http://chicagomaroon.com/2010/05/28/mfire-plan-renews-faculty-clash-with-admin/,2015-01-28.
(1)Robert Zimmer,Thomas Rosenbaum,“Faculty Engagement at the University”.
(2)Ibid.
(3)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(4)The CORES,“Cores Statement-June 14,”June 14,2010,http://uchicagocores.worldpress.com/debate/june14 response/,2014-12-10.
(5)Marshall Sahlins,“China U,”The Nation,November 2013,pp.36-43.
(6)Raymond Fang,“Signers of Faculty Petition Raise Concerns on Confucius Institute,”May 13,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/13/signers-of-faculty-petition-raise-concerns-on-confucius-ins titute-faculty-freedoms/,2014-12-10.
(1)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding,”April 29,2014,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/04/29/chicago-faculty-object-their-campuss-confuciu s-institute,2015-01-20.
(2)The CORES,“Petition”.
(3)芝加哥大学东亚研究中心(The Center for East Asian Studies,CEAS),是芝加哥大学校内支持东亚研究的研究机构,由中国研究委员会、日本研究委员会和韩国研究委员会组成。芝加哥大学孔子学院座落于该中心内。
(1)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(2)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(3)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April 2014.
(6)The CORES,“Cores/Admin Meeting-June 4”.
(7)The CORES,“Petition to the Committee of the Council,”April 2014,https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCUQFj AB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.insidehighered.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Fserver_files%2Ffiles%2FChicago%2520Petition%2520re%2520Confucius%2520Institute%2520%25282%2529.docx&ei=5WXTVKTuG-G8mg WKl4GICQ&usg=AFQj CNGqrwdjt8DWBrcX FY_j Gt39f Eck2g,2014-12-10.(1)
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(4)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(5)Ibid.
(6)Ibid.
(1)Harini Jaganathan,Alice Xiao,“Confucius Institute protested by faculty,”May 2,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/05/02/confucius-insitute-protested-by-faculty/,2014-12-10.
(2)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》,《解放周末》2014年9月19日。
(3)同上。
(4)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(5)Raymond Fang,“Confucius Institute Board Defends Campus Presence,”June 3,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/06/03/confucius-institute-board-defends-campus-presence/,2014-12-10.
(6)Elizabeth Redden,“Confucius Controversies,”July 24,2014,https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/07/24/debate-renews-over-confucius-institutes,2015-01-20.
(1)Ibid.
(2)Ibid.
(3)Ibid.
(4)Ibid.
(5)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April 2015.
(6)Ibid.
(7)Ibid.
(8)Ibid.
(1)Eleanor Hyu,“O-Issue 2014:While you were out,”http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/25/o-issue-2014-while-you-were-out/,2014-12-11.
(2)The Editorial Board,The University of Chicago Magazine,July-Aug 2014,Vol.106,No.6,pp.8.
(3)Raymond Fang,“Signers of Faculty Petition Raise Concerns on Confucius Institute”.
(4)Ibid.
(5)Elizabeth Redden,“Confucius Controversies”.
(6)The Email Interviews with Bruce Lincoln in April,2015.
(1)Theodore Foss,“Chinese Studies at Chicago:A Brief History of the Origin of Chinese Studies at the University of Chicago,”https://ceas.uchicago.edu/sites/ceas.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/About/Ted_Foss_Article.pdf,2015-05-05.
(2)芝加哥大学孔子学院:《2012-2013年度报告》,第2-9页。
(3)芝加哥大学孔子学院:《2012-2013年度报告》,第2-9页;CEAS,“Grants and Fellowships,”https://ceas.uchicago.edu/page/grants-and-fellowships,2015-05-05.
(4)Marshall Sahlins,“China U”.
(1)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》。
(2)Don Starr,“Chinese Language Education in Europe,”European Journal of Education,Vol.44,No.1,pp.65-82.
(3)The Interview with a former Director of CIs who once worked in U.S.in March 2015;Amy Stambach,Confucius and Crisis in American Universities:Culture,Capital and Diplomacy in USPublic Higher Education,New York:Routledge,2014,pp.72-75.
(4)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute,”September 30,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/30/university-to-end-partnership-with-confucius-institute/,2014-12-10.
(5)狄雨霏:《芝加哥大学暂停孔子学院续约谈判》,2014年9月29日,http://cn.nytimes.com/china/20140929/c29confucius/,2014-12-10。
(6)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute”.
(1)The UC,“Statement on the Confucius Institute at the University of Chicago,”http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2014/09/25/statement-confucius-institute-university-chicago#stha sh.7FSu8T8Q.dpuf,2014-12-08.
(2)The Email Interviews with Raymond Fang who is the journalist of Chicago Maroon,in April2015.
(3)Falk Harting,”Confucius Institutes and the Rise of China,”Journal of Chinese Political Science,2012,Vol.17,pp.53-76;Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(4)The Interview with a Chinese CIs director who once worked in U.S,in March 2015.
(1)Ibid.
(2)The Email Interviews with Richard Saller who is the director of Confucius Institute at Stanford University,in September 2015.
(3)Elizabeth Redden,“Rejecting Confucius Funding”.
(4)王一:《文化的困境,在于不知不觉:独家对话国家汉办主任、孔子学院总干事许琳》。
(5)Christine Schmidt,“University to end partnership with Confucius Institute,”September 30,2014,http://chicagomaroon.com/2014/09/30/university-to-end-partnership-with-confucius-institute/,2014-12-10.
(6)狄雨霏:《芝加哥大学暂停孔子学院续约谈判》。
(7)G.E.,“Confucius Institutes:About Face,”September 26,2014,http://www.economists.com/blogs/analects/2014/09/confucius-institutes,2014-12-23.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |