基于价值工程理论的乡村振兴工程绩效评价研究
|
摘要
目前国内对于乡村振兴的研究多集中在对策路径和评价指标的方面,鲜有对乡村振兴绩效评价的关注。文章基于价值工程理论构建了乡村振兴工程绩效评价指标体系模型,应用Shapley法、三角模糊数法和模糊综合评价法对功能要素和成本要素进行指标赋权及数据的量化集结,并以价值系数作为乡村振兴工程绩效水平的评判标准,以期对乡村振兴工程绩效水平的高低进行判断,分析乡村振兴工程实施过程中的资源利用效率,进而为乡村振兴工程绩效优化措施的提出指明方向。
At present, domestic research on rural revitalization mostly focuses on countermeasures and evaluation indicators, and there is little concern about rural performance evaluation. Based on the value engineering theory, this paper constructs the performance evaluation index system model of rural revitalization project, and applies Shapley method, triangular fuzzy number method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to perform indicator weighting and quantitative aggregation of data of the functional elements and cost, and uses the value coefficient as the evaluation criteria of the performance level of rural revitalization project, in order to judge the level of performance of rural revitalization project, analyze the resource utilization efficiency in the implementation process of rural revitalization project, and then point out the direction for the performance optimization measures of rural revitalization project.
At present, domestic research on rural revitalization mostly focuses on countermeasures and evaluation indicators, and there is little concern about rural performance evaluation. Based on the value engineering theory, this paper constructs the performance evaluation index system model of rural revitalization project, and applies Shapley method, triangular fuzzy number method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to perform indicator weighting and quantitative aggregation of data of the functional elements and cost, and uses the value coefficient as the evaluation criteria of the performance level of rural revitalization project, in order to judge the level of performance of rural revitalization project, analyze the resource utilization efficiency in the implementation process of rural revitalization project, and then point out the direction for the performance optimization measures of rural revitalization project.
引文
[1]查金保.奥运场馆总承包成本风险的价值工程分析[D].北京化工大学,2007.
[2]吴忠权.基于乡村振兴的人力资本开发新要求与路径创新[J].理论与改革,2018(06):44-52.
[3]鲍荣,刘世倩.保护挖掘乡村文化助推乡村振兴[N].衡水日报,2018-11-12(A03).
[4]赵品绩,王海霞.三产融合,打通乡村产业振兴脉络[J].农村经营管理,2018(11):20.
[5]刘文玉.以基层党建引领乡村振兴的基本路径[N].甘肃日报,2018-10-30(005).
[6]郑家琪,杨同毅.乡村振兴评价指标体系的构建[J].农村经济与科技,2018,29(17):38-40.
[7]韦家华,连漪.乡村振兴评价指标体系研究[J].价格理论与实践,2018(09):82-85.
[8]Hall C,Mcvittie A,Moran D.What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside?A review of evidence and methods[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2004,20(2):211-225.
[9]Elands B H M,Wiersum K F,Forestry and rural development in European exploration of socio-political discourses[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2001(3):5-16.
[10]李树德,李瑾.天津市社会主义新农村建设考核评价研究[J].农业技术经济,2006(6):60-64.
[11]唐双娥,郑太福.生态成本控制的公私法局限[J].社会科学家,2006(01):97-102.
[2]吴忠权.基于乡村振兴的人力资本开发新要求与路径创新[J].理论与改革,2018(06):44-52.
[3]鲍荣,刘世倩.保护挖掘乡村文化助推乡村振兴[N].衡水日报,2018-11-12(A03).
[4]赵品绩,王海霞.三产融合,打通乡村产业振兴脉络[J].农村经营管理,2018(11):20.
[5]刘文玉.以基层党建引领乡村振兴的基本路径[N].甘肃日报,2018-10-30(005).
[6]郑家琪,杨同毅.乡村振兴评价指标体系的构建[J].农村经济与科技,2018,29(17):38-40.
[7]韦家华,连漪.乡村振兴评价指标体系研究[J].价格理论与实践,2018(09):82-85.
[8]Hall C,Mcvittie A,Moran D.What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside?A review of evidence and methods[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2004,20(2):211-225.
[9]Elands B H M,Wiersum K F,Forestry and rural development in European exploration of socio-political discourses[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2001(3):5-16.
[10]李树德,李瑾.天津市社会主义新农村建设考核评价研究[J].农业技术经济,2006(6):60-64.
[11]唐双娥,郑太福.生态成本控制的公私法局限[J].社会科学家,2006(01):97-102.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |