基础设施投资的资源错配效应研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Study on the Resource Mismatch Effect of Infrastructure Investment 作者：潘雅茹 ; 高红贵 英文作者：PAN Ya-ru;GAO Hong-gui; 关键词：基础设施投资 ; 资本错配 ; 劳动力错配 ; 区域异质性 英文关键词：infrastructure investment;;capital mismatch;;labor mismatch;;regional heterogeneity 中文刊名：REFO 英文刊名：Reform 机构：武汉科技大学文法与经济学院;中南财经政法大学经济学院; 出版日期：2019-07-15 出版单位：改革 年：2019 期：No.305 基金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“基础设施投资结构变迁对中国全要素生产率的影响及作用机制研究”(17CJY001);; 湖北省技术创新专项软科学项目“科技基础设施与区域创新绩效关系研究——以湖北省为例”(2019ADC127);; 湖北省中小企业研究中心开放基金课题“基础设施支持中小企业提升创新绩效研究”(HBSME2019A03) 语种：中文; 页：REFO201907006 页数：11 CN：07 ISSN：50-1012/F 分类号：62-72

摘要

利用2008～2017年我国30个省(区、市)的面板数据,在分别测算各省(区、市)资本错配指数和劳动力错配指数的基础上,采用系统GMM方法考察基础设施投资对资本和劳动力错配的纠正程度。研究发现:一般性基础设施投资有助于降低资本和劳动力错配指数,而科技型基础设施投资在一定程度上加剧了资本和劳动力错配;基础设施投资对资源错配的影响并不是简单的线性关系,而是随着基础设施投资的调整表现出显著的非线性特征,其中,科技型基础设施投资对资本和劳动力错配均呈现先加剧后改善的非线性关系,一般性基础设施投资对资本错配则呈现先改善后恶化的非线性特征;分地区估计结果表明,基础设施投资对资源错配的影响存在显著的区域异质性。
        Based on the panel data of 30 provinces(districts and municipalities) in China from 2008 to 2017, and on the basis of calculating the capital mismatch index and labor mismatch index of each province(districts and municipalities) separately, the corrective degree of infrastructure investment to capital and labor mismatch is investigated by using the system GMM method. The research finds that:general infrastructure investment helps to reduce the mismatch index of capital and labor, while scientific and technological infrastructure investment aggravates the mismatch of capital and labor to a certain extent; the impact of infrastructure investment on resource mismatch is not a simple linear relationship, but shows with the adjustment of infrastructure investment. Significant non-linear characteristics, among which, the non-linear relationship between investment in science and technology infrastructure and mismatch of capital and labor force increases first and then improves, while the non-linear relationship between general infrastructure investment and mismatch of capital first improves and then deteriorates.The results of regional estimation show that there is significant regional heterogeneity in the impact of infrastructure investment on resource misallocation.

引文

[1]HSIEH C T,KLENOW P J.Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009124(4):1403-1448.
    [2]张佩.中国工业部门的行业间资源错配研究[J].投资研究,2013(6):15-27.
    [3]王林辉,袁礼.资本错配会诱发全要素生产率损失吗?[J].统计研究,2014(8):11-18.
    [4]韩剑,郑秋玲.政府干预如何导致地区资源错配——基于行业内和行业间错配的分解[J].中国工业经济,2014(11):69-81.
    [5]靳来群,林金忠,丁诗诗.行政垄断对所有制差异所致资源错配的影响[J].中国工业经济,2015(4):31-43.
    [6]RESTUCCIA D,ROGERSON R.Misallocation and productivity[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2013,16(1):1-10.
    [7]MUNSHI K,ROSENZWEIG M.Networks and misallocation:insurance,migration,and the rural-urban wage gap[J].American Economic Review,2016,106(1):46-98.
    [8]崔书会,李光勤,豆建民.产业协同集聚的资源错配效应研究[J].统计研究,2019(2):76-87.
    [9]宋结焱,施炳展.出口贸易是否降低了中国行业内资源错配[J].世界经济研究,2014(10):53-61.
    [10]ASTURIAS J,et al.Misallocation,internal trade,and the role of transportation infrastructure[R].Working Paper,2014.
    [11]GHANI E,GOSWAMI A G,KERR W RHighway to success:The impact of the golden quadrilateral project for the location and performance of Indian manufacturing[J].E-conomic Journal,2016,126(591):317-357.
    [12]贾俊雪.公共基础设施投资与全要素生产率:基于异质企业家模型的理论分析[J].经济研究,2017(2):4-19.
    [13]周海波,胡汉辉,谢呈阳,等.地区资源错配与交通基础设施——来自中国的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2017(1):100-113.
    [14]李欣泽,纪小乐,周灵灵.高铁能改善企业资源配置吗?——来自中国工业企业数据库和高铁地理数据的微观证据[J].经济评论,2017(6):3-24.
    [15]张陈一轩,任宗哲.改革开放40年来交通基础设施投资能够缓解要素错配么?[J]人文杂志,2019(3):10-17.
    [16]范欣,宋冬林,赵新宇.基础设施建设打破了国内市场分割吗?[J].经济研究,2017(2):20-34.
    [17]EGERT,et al.Infrastructure and growth:Empirical evidence[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2009,50(3):355-364.
    [18]白俊红,刘宇英.对外直接投资能否改善中国的资源错配[J].中国工业经济,2018(1):60-78.
    [19]童健,武康平.经济发展进程中的基础设施投资结构变迁[J].经济研究,2016(12):61-77.
    [20]MELITZ M J.The impact of trade on intraindustry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J].Econometric,2003,71(6):1695-1725.