政府治理、国有企业混合所有制改革与资本配置效率

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Government Governance, Mixed Ownership Reform of State-owned Enterprises and Capital Allocation Efficiency 作者：祁怀锦 ; 李晖 ; 刘艳霞 英文作者：QI Huai-jin;LI Hui;LIU Yan-xia; 关键词：政府治理 ; 混合所有制改革 ; 国有企业 ; 资本配置效率 英文关键词：government governance;;mixed ownership reform;;state-owned enterprises;;capital allocation efficiency 中文刊名：REFO 英文刊名：Reform 机构：中央财经大学会计学院;北京化工大学经济管理学院; 出版日期：2019-07-15 出版单位：改革 年：2019 期：No.305 基金：财政部会计名家培养工程资助项目“政府治理、国有企业混合所有制改革与资本配置效率”;; 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“大股东股权质押的行为、动机与风险研究”(19A10034027) 语种：中文; 页：REFO201907004 页数：12 CN：07 ISSN：50-1012/F 分类号：40-51

摘要

以2008～2017年国有上市公司为样本,检验了政府治理、国有企业混合所有制改革与资本配置效率三者之间的关系。研究发现:国有企业混合所有制改革程度与企业资本配置效率显著正相关,即国有企业混合所有制改革能够提升企业资本配置效率;政府治理水平与企业资本配置效率显著正相关,其主要体现为从提升政府效率、加快市场化进程等方面改善政府治理水平,能显著提高企业资本配置效率;相比政府治理水平较低的地区,国有企业混合所有制改革提升资本配置效率的效果在政府治理水平较高的地区更明显,即政府治理对混合所有制改革提升企业资本配置效率有促进作用。进一步分析发现,混合所有制改革对资本配置效率的促进作用分别在非国有股东持股比例介于1/3至2/3之间和资产负债率低的样本组更显著,而政府治理对企业资本配置效率的正向影响在资产负债率高的样本组更显著。
        Based on the panel data of the state-owned listed companies in China from 2008 to2017, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the relationship among government governance, mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and capital allocation efficiency. The results show that: there is a significant positive correlation between the degree of mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and the efficiency of capital allocation, that is, the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises can improve the efficiency of capital allocation. Here is a significant positive correlation between the level of government governance and the efficiency of capital allocation. Further tests show that improving the level of government governance from the aspects of improving the efficiency of government and accelerating the marketization process can significantly improve the efficiency of capital allocation.Compared with regions with low level of government governance, the effect of mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises on improving capital allocation efficiency is more significant in regions with high level of government governance, that is, government governance improves the positive effect of mixed ownership reform on capital allocation of enterprises. Further analysis shows that the positive effect of mixed ownership reform on the efficiency of capital allocation is more significant in the sample group with the share of non-state shareholders between 1/3-2/3 and low asset-liability ratio respectively, while the positive effect of government governance on the efficiency of capital allocation is more significant in the sample group with high asset-liability ratio. This study provides a theoretical reference for deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises and government in China.

引文

[1]綦好东,郭骏超,朱炜.国有企业混合所有制改革:动力、阻力与实现路径[J].管理世界,2017(10):8-19.
    [2]BACKX M,CARNEY M,GEDAJLOVIC EPublic,private and mixed ownership and the performance of international airlines[J].Journal of Air Transport Management,2002,8(4)213-220.
    [3]马连福,王丽丽,张琦.混合所有制的优序选择:市场的逻辑[J].中国工业经济,2015(7):5-20.
    [4]郝阳,龚六堂.国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进[J].经济研究,2017(3):122-135.
    [5]张祥建,郭丽虹,徐龙炳.中国国有企业混合所有制改革与企业投资效率——基于留存国有股控制和高管政治关联的分析[J].经济管理,2015(9):132-145.
    [6]杨志强,李增泉.混合所有制、环境不确定性与投资效率——基于产权专业化视角[J]上海财经大学学报,2018(2):4-24.
    [7]郝云宏,汪茜.混合所有制企业股权制衡机制研究——基于“鄂武商控制权之争”的案例解析[J].中国工业经济,2015(3):148-160.
    [8]刘运国,郑巧,蔡贵龙.非国有股东提高了国有企业的内部控制质量吗?——来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J].会计研究,2016(11):61-68.
    [9]曾诗韵,蔡贵龙,程敏英.非国有股东能改善会计信息质量吗?——来自竞争性国有上市公司的经验证据[J].会计与经济研究,2017(4):28-44.
    [10]蔡贵龙,郑国坚,马新啸,等.国有企业的政府放权意愿与混合所有制改革[J].经济研究,2018(9):99-115.
    [11]祁怀锦,刘艳霞,王文涛.国有企业混合所有制改革效应评估及其实现路径[J].改革,2018(9):66-80.
    [12]王艳.混合所有制并购与创新驱动发展——广东省地方国企“瀚蓝环境”2001~2015年纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2016(8):150-163.
    [13]FAN J P H,WEL K C J,XU X Z.Corporate finance and governance in emerging markets aselective review and an agenda for future research[J].Journal of Corporate Finance2010,17(2):207-214.
    [14]LAPORTA R,LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F,SHLEIFER A,et al.Agency problems and dividend policies around the world[J].Journal of Finance,2000,55(1):1-33.
    [15]戴亦一,潘越,陈芬.媒体监督、政府质量与审计师变更[J].会计研究,2013(10):89-95.
    [16]陈德球,李思飞,钟昀珈.政府质量、投资与资本配置效率[J].世界经济,2012(3):89-110.
    [17]姜琪.政府质量、文化资本与地区经济发展——基于数量和质量双重视角的考察[J].经济评论,2016(2):58-73.
    [18]陈钊.经济转轨中的企业重构:产权改革与放松管制[M].上海:三联书店、上海人民出版社,2004:16-80.
    (1)受篇幅所限,具体结果未在此处列出。若有需要,可联系作者索取。
    (1)受篇幅所限,此处未列示相关结果。若有需要,可联系作者索取。