地方文化对司法裁判的影响研究
|
摘要
随着法治建设的不断推进,社会法治理念不断加深,和谐司法、和谐解决社会矛盾纠纷成为法治进路中的一大目标,而实现这一目标的关键在于司法判决的合法、合理、公正及可接受性。这就需要在司法实践中充分考虑地方文化、民俗习惯等因素,避免司法过程、法律逻辑过于僵化;应坚持司法理性,以达到政治效果、司法效果及社会效果三者的平衡,使司法经得起重新审视、经得起社会各界的检验。坚持理性司法有利于维护社会稳定、维护司法权威,有利于达到定纷止争的良好效果及社会和谐发展。通过地方文化对刑事、民事及行政的司法裁判影响,达到既遵循司法,又能考量司法背后的情理价值,要自始至终贯彻和遵循罪刑均衡原则、法益保护原则以及人们对公平正义和是非善恶的基本判断,将社会的情理价值注入到对刑法文本含义的阐释中,拒绝"淡漠的客观主义"解释范式。情理价值角度的制约,旨在纠正刑法解释的"法律文本主义"和机械的思维方法,使其超越刑法文本的形式藩篱而向生活事实和经验逻辑开放,避免出现因机械执法所造成的形式上合法但实质上不合理、违背人们的法律感情、损害法律的公平正义、影响社会稳定的司法判决。
With the continuous advancement of the rule of law in China,the concept of social rule of law has been firmly established,and harmonious justice and settlement of social conflicts and disputes has become a major goal in the rule of law. The key to achieve this goal is that the judicial judgment is legal,reasonable,fair and acceptable. In the judicial practice,full consideration should be given to local culture,folk customs and other factors to avoid the judicial process and legal logic being too rigid; Judicial rationality should be adhered to in order to achieve the balance of political effects,judicial effects and social effects,so that the judiciary can stand up to re-examination and the test of all walks of life. Upholding rational justice is conducive to maintaining social stability and judicial authority. It is beneficial to achieve the good effect of settling disputes and social harmonious development. Through the influence of local culture on criminal,civil and administrative judicial decisions,it is possible to follow the judiciary and consider the rational value behind the judiciary. It is necessary to follow the principle of criminal punishment balance,legal protection and people's basic judgments on fairness,justice and right and wrong. The rational value of society is taken into account in the interpretation of the text of the criminal law so as to avoid the paradigm of " indifferent objectivism". The restriction of the rational value aims to correct the " legal textualism" and mechanical thinking methods of criminal law interpretation so that criminal law interpretation is open to the logic of life facts and experience beyond the form of criminal law text. Judicial judgments that are formally legal but irrational due to mechanical law enforcement,hurting people's legal feelings,destroying the fairness and justice of the law,and affecting social stability can be avoided.
With the continuous advancement of the rule of law in China,the concept of social rule of law has been firmly established,and harmonious justice and settlement of social conflicts and disputes has become a major goal in the rule of law. The key to achieve this goal is that the judicial judgment is legal,reasonable,fair and acceptable. In the judicial practice,full consideration should be given to local culture,folk customs and other factors to avoid the judicial process and legal logic being too rigid; Judicial rationality should be adhered to in order to achieve the balance of political effects,judicial effects and social effects,so that the judiciary can stand up to re-examination and the test of all walks of life. Upholding rational justice is conducive to maintaining social stability and judicial authority. It is beneficial to achieve the good effect of settling disputes and social harmonious development. Through the influence of local culture on criminal,civil and administrative judicial decisions,it is possible to follow the judiciary and consider the rational value behind the judiciary. It is necessary to follow the principle of criminal punishment balance,legal protection and people's basic judgments on fairness,justice and right and wrong. The rational value of society is taken into account in the interpretation of the text of the criminal law so as to avoid the paradigm of " indifferent objectivism". The restriction of the rational value aims to correct the " legal textualism" and mechanical thinking methods of criminal law interpretation so that criminal law interpretation is open to the logic of life facts and experience beyond the form of criminal law text. Judicial judgments that are formally legal but irrational due to mechanical law enforcement,hurting people's legal feelings,destroying the fairness and justice of the law,and affecting social stability can be avoided.
引文
[1]卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004:4.
[2]曹士平.论民俗习惯司法适用的可行性:以姜堰法院司法实践为例[D].苏州:苏州大学,2010:1.
[3]山本祐司.最高裁物语:日本司法50年[M].孙占坤,祁玫,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:221.
[4]孙日华.中国语境下的法律规范与事实[J].云南行政学院学报,2010(2):131-134.
[5]孙日华.裁判客观性研究[D].济南:山东大学,2011:153.
[6]樊崇义.《底线》刑事错案防范标准[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015:29.
[7]赵力.司法裁判的影响因素及法律方法运用探究[D].烟台:烟台大学,2017:63.
[8]田慧.司法终局性的实现路径研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2017:30.
[9]苏力.法治及其本土资源[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:100.
[10]范愉.多元化纠纷解决机制[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2006:68.
[11]朱政.法律适用的重构与中国实践[D].南京:南京师范大学,2014:10.
(1)参见澎湃新闻2017年12月30日文章《非遗传人制烟花案改判有罪免罚,家人不申诉:让老人安度晚年》(文章来源于《扬子晚报》微信公众号),https:∥www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1928393。
(2)参见凤凰网资讯频道2018年4月10日文章《山里的特殊家庭一妻两夫三娃的生活》,http:∥news.ifeng.com/a/20180410/57457897_0.shtml#p=1。
(3)参见网易视频《纪录片编辑室》2016年1月8日纪录片《最后的枪手部落》(视频来源于东方卫视),http:∥v.163.com/static/3/VBBTI6PO3.html#from=search。
(4)德古是指凉山彝族地区特有的专门解决地方纠纷的组织或个人。
[2]曹士平.论民俗习惯司法适用的可行性:以姜堰法院司法实践为例[D].苏州:苏州大学,2010:1.
[3]山本祐司.最高裁物语:日本司法50年[M].孙占坤,祁玫,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:221.
[4]孙日华.中国语境下的法律规范与事实[J].云南行政学院学报,2010(2):131-134.
[5]孙日华.裁判客观性研究[D].济南:山东大学,2011:153.
[6]樊崇义.《底线》刑事错案防范标准[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015:29.
[7]赵力.司法裁判的影响因素及法律方法运用探究[D].烟台:烟台大学,2017:63.
[8]田慧.司法终局性的实现路径研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2017:30.
[9]苏力.法治及其本土资源[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:100.
[10]范愉.多元化纠纷解决机制[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2006:68.
[11]朱政.法律适用的重构与中国实践[D].南京:南京师范大学,2014:10.
(1)参见澎湃新闻2017年12月30日文章《非遗传人制烟花案改判有罪免罚,家人不申诉:让老人安度晚年》(文章来源于《扬子晚报》微信公众号),https:∥www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1928393。
(2)参见凤凰网资讯频道2018年4月10日文章《山里的特殊家庭一妻两夫三娃的生活》,http:∥news.ifeng.com/a/20180410/57457897_0.shtml#p=1。
(3)参见网易视频《纪录片编辑室》2016年1月8日纪录片《最后的枪手部落》(视频来源于东方卫视),http:∥v.163.com/static/3/VBBTI6PO3.html#from=search。
(4)德古是指凉山彝族地区特有的专门解决地方纠纷的组织或个人。
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |