基于多元影响效应的北方7省花海旅游区域差异分析
|
摘要
[目的]通过分析花海旅游的多元影响效应,比较北方7省花海旅游的区域差异,以期实现花海旅游区域发展的均衡性与可持续性。[方法]以北方7省典型花海旅游区为研究对象,通过区域差异评价指标进行筛选,构建花海旅游区域差异评价指标体系,采用层次分级计算权重值及聚类分析法对7省区花海景观进行综合排序。[结果]聚类分析表明, 5个系统指标23个影响指标中经济、社会、生态与文化等综合指标影响效果依次递减,表现为区域旅游收入水平、生态环境保护力度、基础设施建设程度、文化资源总量等方面,将7个省区划分为3类地区,其优劣排序为一类地区>二类地区>三类地区。[结论]区域经济发展水平、旅游业占GDP比重、人均GDP水平、政府经济投入力度及基础设施建设程度是影响花海旅游发展的主要因素;北方7省花海旅游区域差异较大,基本态势为偏东部地区花海旅游综合实力较好。
Through analyzing the multiple influence effects, this study compared the regional differences of flower-sea tourism in seven northern provinces in order to achieve the balanced and sustainable development of flower-sea tourism. Taking seven typical flower-sea tourist areas in the northern provinces as the research object, this study established the evaluation index system of the differences between the flowers tourism by selecting the index of regional difference evaluation. Moreover, it made a comprehensive ranking for 7 provinces of flower landscape by using analytic hierarchy process and cluster analysis. The results showed that the economic, social, ecological and cultural indicators among 23 elements in 5 system indicators decreased in turn, showing in these aspects, such as the regional tourism income, the protection of ecological environment, the degree of infrastructure construction, the total amount of cultural resources, etc. The seven provinces and autonomous regions were divided into three types of regions, and their advantages and disadvantages were classified into three types of regions: the first type of region> the second type>the third type. Therefore, the main influencing factors in the regional differences of flower-sea tourism are summarized including the level of regional economic development, the proportion of tourism to GDP, the level of per-capita GDP, the government′s economic input and the degree of infrastructure construction. The regional differences of flower-sea tourism in the seven northern provinces are large, and the basic trend is that the comprehensive strength of flower-sea tourism in the eastern part of China is better.
Through analyzing the multiple influence effects, this study compared the regional differences of flower-sea tourism in seven northern provinces in order to achieve the balanced and sustainable development of flower-sea tourism. Taking seven typical flower-sea tourist areas in the northern provinces as the research object, this study established the evaluation index system of the differences between the flowers tourism by selecting the index of regional difference evaluation. Moreover, it made a comprehensive ranking for 7 provinces of flower landscape by using analytic hierarchy process and cluster analysis. The results showed that the economic, social, ecological and cultural indicators among 23 elements in 5 system indicators decreased in turn, showing in these aspects, such as the regional tourism income, the protection of ecological environment, the degree of infrastructure construction, the total amount of cultural resources, etc. The seven provinces and autonomous regions were divided into three types of regions, and their advantages and disadvantages were classified into three types of regions: the first type of region> the second type>the third type. Therefore, the main influencing factors in the regional differences of flower-sea tourism are summarized including the level of regional economic development, the proportion of tourism to GDP, the level of per-capita GDP, the government′s economic input and the degree of infrastructure construction. The regional differences of flower-sea tourism in the seven northern provinces are large, and the basic trend is that the comprehensive strength of flower-sea tourism in the eastern part of China is better.
引文
[1] 周璐.安徽地区花海景观的研究与实践.合肥:安徽农业大学,2016.
[2] 何丽芳.浅谈花卉文化旅游审美.湖南林业,2003(9):13.
[3] 谢云,王小德,孟明浩,等.临安市花卉旅游业发展前景探讨.浙江林业科技,2005,3(2):65-68.
[4] 高洪涛.河南许昌地区土地流转与花卉旅游开发.北方园艺,2012(2):200-202.
[5] 卢宗源,彭华,李劲廷.花海旅游项目体验性探究.现代园艺,2017(16):14-15.
[6] 朱俊杰,丁登山,韩南生.中国旅游业地域不平衡分析.人文地理,2001,16(1):27-30.
[7] 王汝辉,杨辉.西部旅游区域市场的弱根基性.资源开发与市场,2002(3):43-43.
[8] 高鹏.论我国东西部地区旅游开发战略的比较.太原大学学报,2004,5(1):30-32.
[9] 朱应皋,万绪才.旅游业国际竞争力定量评价理论研究.南京财经大学学报,2003(5):12-17.
[10] 万绪才,丁敏,宋平.南京市国内游客满意度评估及其区域差异性研究.经济师,2004(1):246-247.
[11] 周玉翠,陆玉麒,谢江红.我国国际旅游的区域差异.经济问题探索,2005(9):39-42.
[12] 叶护平,韦燕生.中国旅游业发展区域差异的系统分析.华中师范大学学报,2005,39(3):395-398.
[13] 李世楠.黑龙江省农业旅游的现状及发展对策.北方园艺,2012(22):195-198.
[14] https://baike.so.com/doc/5621917-5834534.html.
[15] http://www.likefar.com/scene/1070/.
[16] https://item.btime.com/m_9abd7e2c224a7b44f.
[17] https://baike.so.com/doc/25862947-27010858.html.
[18] 杨婧,张九玲,朱春福,等.薰衣草主题园发展现状及对策.北方园艺,2017(21):114-121.
[19] 陈胜可.SPSS 统计分析从入门到精通.北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
[20] 杨延风,马俊杰.对国内生态旅游理论与实践的反思.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(12):235-240.
[21] 颜文华.休闲农业旅游产品开发模式创新研究.中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(7):123-128
[2] 何丽芳.浅谈花卉文化旅游审美.湖南林业,2003(9):13.
[3] 谢云,王小德,孟明浩,等.临安市花卉旅游业发展前景探讨.浙江林业科技,2005,3(2):65-68.
[4] 高洪涛.河南许昌地区土地流转与花卉旅游开发.北方园艺,2012(2):200-202.
[5] 卢宗源,彭华,李劲廷.花海旅游项目体验性探究.现代园艺,2017(16):14-15.
[6] 朱俊杰,丁登山,韩南生.中国旅游业地域不平衡分析.人文地理,2001,16(1):27-30.
[7] 王汝辉,杨辉.西部旅游区域市场的弱根基性.资源开发与市场,2002(3):43-43.
[8] 高鹏.论我国东西部地区旅游开发战略的比较.太原大学学报,2004,5(1):30-32.
[9] 朱应皋,万绪才.旅游业国际竞争力定量评价理论研究.南京财经大学学报,2003(5):12-17.
[10] 万绪才,丁敏,宋平.南京市国内游客满意度评估及其区域差异性研究.经济师,2004(1):246-247.
[11] 周玉翠,陆玉麒,谢江红.我国国际旅游的区域差异.经济问题探索,2005(9):39-42.
[12] 叶护平,韦燕生.中国旅游业发展区域差异的系统分析.华中师范大学学报,2005,39(3):395-398.
[13] 李世楠.黑龙江省农业旅游的现状及发展对策.北方园艺,2012(22):195-198.
[14] https://baike.so.com/doc/5621917-5834534.html.
[15] http://www.likefar.com/scene/1070/.
[16] https://item.btime.com/m_9abd7e2c224a7b44f.
[17] https://baike.so.com/doc/25862947-27010858.html.
[18] 杨婧,张九玲,朱春福,等.薰衣草主题园发展现状及对策.北方园艺,2017(21):114-121.
[19] 陈胜可.SPSS 统计分析从入门到精通.北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
[20] 杨延风,马俊杰.对国内生态旅游理论与实践的反思.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(12):235-240.
[21] 颜文华.休闲农业旅游产品开发模式创新研究.中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(7):123-128
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |