沈阳城市周边耕地多功能评价
|
摘要
[目的]为探索城市化影响下城市周边耕地多功能的现状,分析其空间差异,为耕地保护及城市周边耕地发展提供参考。[方法]从耕地的生产、生态、社会和景观4个功能出发构建评价指标体系,利用熵权法确定指标权重,加权求和法计算单一功能和多功能值,并用ArcGIS进行空间分析,对沈阳城市周边50个乡镇(街道)的耕地多功能性进行综合评价。[结果](1)沈阳城市周边耕地的多功能性空间差异较为明显。生产功能远郊平原区最强,远郊山区和近郊区较弱;生态功能总体偏弱,个别乡镇较好;距离城市越远,社会功能越强;景观功能近郊区较强,远郊区较弱。(2)耕地的生态、社会和景观功能主要受距市中心距离的影响,生产功能受地形和距市中心距离的双重影响,而多功能则受地形、距市中心距离及各乡镇(街道)耕地主导功能等的综合影响。(3)沈阳城市周边的大多数耕地以农业生产为主导,景观文化功能整体相对较弱。近郊区耕地生态功能所占比重较大,但社会功能比重较小,远郊区则与之相反。[结论]沈阳城市周边耕地多功能性空间差异较为明显且不均衡,应科学规划城市周边耕地功能,优化空间布局,协调耕地各功能的关系,促进耕地多功能综合发展。
This study aims to analyze the multi-function situation and spatial pattern of the cultivated land around Shenyang city, so as to protect the cultivated land and provide reference for the development of cultivated land in peri-urban areas. The evaluation index system was constructed based on the production function, ecology function, society function and landscape function of cultivated land. The weight of index was determined by entropy weight method. The single function and multi-function value were calculated by the weighted summation method. The spatial pattern of functions was analyzed by ArcGIS. A comprehensive evaluation on multi-function of cultivated land was carried out in 50 towns(streets) around Shenyang city. The evaluation results showed that(1) The spatial difference of multifunction of cultivated land were obvious around Shenyang city. The production function of cultivated land was the strongest in the farthest plain zone, but was relatively weak in the farthest and the nearest mountainous zone. The ecological function was faintish in most towns(streets), but few towns were preferable. The farther away from the city, the better the social function; The landscape function of cultivated land was stronger in the nearest zone and weaker in the farthest zone.(2) The ecological function, the social function and the landscape function of cultivated land mainly affected by the distance from the center of the city. The production function of cultivated land was affected by both the topography and the distance from the center of the city. The multi-function of cultivated land were influenced by the topography, the distance from the center of the city and the main functions of cultivated land in single towns(streets).(3) Most cultivated land around Shenyang city were used to agricultural production, so the landscape function was relatively weak. The ecological function of cultivated land in the nearest zone was the main function, while the social function was weak. On the contrary, the social function was the main function in the farthest zone. The multi-functional spatial pattern of cultivated land around Shenyang city was obvious and difference. It is necessary to scientifically plan the function of cultivated land, optimize its spatial distribution, coordinate the relationship between the each functions of cultivated land, in order to promote the multi-functional development of cultivated land in peri-urban areas of Shenyang city.
This study aims to analyze the multi-function situation and spatial pattern of the cultivated land around Shenyang city, so as to protect the cultivated land and provide reference for the development of cultivated land in peri-urban areas. The evaluation index system was constructed based on the production function, ecology function, society function and landscape function of cultivated land. The weight of index was determined by entropy weight method. The single function and multi-function value were calculated by the weighted summation method. The spatial pattern of functions was analyzed by ArcGIS. A comprehensive evaluation on multi-function of cultivated land was carried out in 50 towns(streets) around Shenyang city. The evaluation results showed that(1) The spatial difference of multifunction of cultivated land were obvious around Shenyang city. The production function of cultivated land was the strongest in the farthest plain zone, but was relatively weak in the farthest and the nearest mountainous zone. The ecological function was faintish in most towns(streets), but few towns were preferable. The farther away from the city, the better the social function; The landscape function of cultivated land was stronger in the nearest zone and weaker in the farthest zone.(2) The ecological function, the social function and the landscape function of cultivated land mainly affected by the distance from the center of the city. The production function of cultivated land was affected by both the topography and the distance from the center of the city. The multi-function of cultivated land were influenced by the topography, the distance from the center of the city and the main functions of cultivated land in single towns(streets).(3) Most cultivated land around Shenyang city were used to agricultural production, so the landscape function was relatively weak. The ecological function of cultivated land in the nearest zone was the main function, while the social function was weak. On the contrary, the social function was the main function in the farthest zone. The multi-functional spatial pattern of cultivated land around Shenyang city was obvious and difference. It is necessary to scientifically plan the function of cultivated land, optimize its spatial distribution, coordinate the relationship between the each functions of cultivated land, in order to promote the multi-functional development of cultivated land in peri-urban areas of Shenyang city.
引文
[1] 施园园.大都市区耕地多功能评价——以北京市为例.北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[2] 宋小青,欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示.地理科学进展,2012,31(7):859-868.
[3] 彭建,刘志聪,刘焱序.农业多功能性评价研究进展.中国农业资源与区划,2014,35(6):1-8.
[4] Schoper B,Helming K,Wiggering H.Assessing land use change impacts-a comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks.Journal of land Use Science,2010,5(2):159～178.
[5] Coyle C,Creamer R E,Schulte R P O,et al.A Functional land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios.Environmental Science & Policy,2016,56:39-48.
[6] Kentaro Yoshida.Economic Valuation of Multi-functional Roles of Agriculture in Hilly and Mountainous Areas in Japan.Journal of Political Economy,2001,(5):152-174.
[7] Luck Fleskens.AFDBI.Aconceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agroecosystems:A case study of Taos′s-Montes olive groves.Journal of Rural Studies,2009,(25):141-155.
[8] 姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护.中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47.
[9] 赵华甫,张凤荣.耕地保护方向待转——从单一功能到多功能的演变交替.中国土地,2010,10:19-20.
[10] Song X,Huang Y,Wu Z,et al.Does cultivated land function transition occur in China.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2015,25(7):817-835.
[11] 辛芸娜,孔祥斌,郧文聚.北京大都市边缘区耕地多功能评价指标体系构建——以大兴区为例.中国土地科学,2017,31(8):77-87.
[12] 钟珍梅,翁伯琦,黄勤楼,等.基于能值理论的循环复合农业生态系统发展评价——以福建省福清星源循环农业产业示范基地为例.生态学报,2012,32(18):5755-5762.
[13] 何露,闵庆文,张丹.农业多功能性多维评价模型及其应用研究.资源科学,2010,32(6):1057-1064.
[14] 陈杰.开封市耕地多功能的评价研究.郑州:河南大学,2013.
[15] 边振兴,康萌,刘琳琳,等.沈阳城市边缘区农地多功能分析.土壤通报,2015,46(3):533-538.
[16] 李博闻,周兴.广西壮族自治区耕地多功能评价研究.资源与环境科学,2017(4):183-184.
[17] 刘沛.城镇化进程中耕地功能分析与评价.长沙:湖南农业大学,2010.
[18] 施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释.资源科学,2015,02:247-257.
[19] 杨雪,谈明洪.北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变.地理研究,2014,33(6):1106-1118.
[20] 周子英.土地利用及其功能变化研究.长沙:湖南农业大学,2012.
[21] 钟源,刘黎明,刘星,等.农业多功能评价与功能分区研究——以湖南省为例.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):93-100.
[22] 康萌.沈阳城市边缘区农地多功能评价与农户认知分析——以沈北新区为例.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2015.
[23] 边振兴,冯玉萍,于淼,等.农田中非耕作生境对耕地多功能影响研究.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(4):154-160,227.
[2] 宋小青,欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示.地理科学进展,2012,31(7):859-868.
[3] 彭建,刘志聪,刘焱序.农业多功能性评价研究进展.中国农业资源与区划,2014,35(6):1-8.
[4] Schoper B,Helming K,Wiggering H.Assessing land use change impacts-a comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks.Journal of land Use Science,2010,5(2):159～178.
[5] Coyle C,Creamer R E,Schulte R P O,et al.A Functional land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios.Environmental Science & Policy,2016,56:39-48.
[6] Kentaro Yoshida.Economic Valuation of Multi-functional Roles of Agriculture in Hilly and Mountainous Areas in Japan.Journal of Political Economy,2001,(5):152-174.
[7] Luck Fleskens.AFDBI.Aconceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agroecosystems:A case study of Taos′s-Montes olive groves.Journal of Rural Studies,2009,(25):141-155.
[8] 姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护.中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47.
[9] 赵华甫,张凤荣.耕地保护方向待转——从单一功能到多功能的演变交替.中国土地,2010,10:19-20.
[10] Song X,Huang Y,Wu Z,et al.Does cultivated land function transition occur in China.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2015,25(7):817-835.
[11] 辛芸娜,孔祥斌,郧文聚.北京大都市边缘区耕地多功能评价指标体系构建——以大兴区为例.中国土地科学,2017,31(8):77-87.
[12] 钟珍梅,翁伯琦,黄勤楼,等.基于能值理论的循环复合农业生态系统发展评价——以福建省福清星源循环农业产业示范基地为例.生态学报,2012,32(18):5755-5762.
[13] 何露,闵庆文,张丹.农业多功能性多维评价模型及其应用研究.资源科学,2010,32(6):1057-1064.
[14] 陈杰.开封市耕地多功能的评价研究.郑州:河南大学,2013.
[15] 边振兴,康萌,刘琳琳,等.沈阳城市边缘区农地多功能分析.土壤通报,2015,46(3):533-538.
[16] 李博闻,周兴.广西壮族自治区耕地多功能评价研究.资源与环境科学,2017(4):183-184.
[17] 刘沛.城镇化进程中耕地功能分析与评价.长沙:湖南农业大学,2010.
[18] 施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释.资源科学,2015,02:247-257.
[19] 杨雪,谈明洪.北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变.地理研究,2014,33(6):1106-1118.
[20] 周子英.土地利用及其功能变化研究.长沙:湖南农业大学,2012.
[21] 钟源,刘黎明,刘星,等.农业多功能评价与功能分区研究——以湖南省为例.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):93-100.
[22] 康萌.沈阳城市边缘区农地多功能评价与农户认知分析——以沈北新区为例.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2015.
[23] 边振兴,冯玉萍,于淼,等.农田中非耕作生境对耕地多功能影响研究.中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(4):154-160,227.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |