城市开放度与全球配置创新资源能力的关系——以杭州为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Relationship between City Openness and Global Allocation Capacity of Innovative Resources: Taking Hangzhou as an Example 作者：姜辉 英文作者：JIANG Hui; 关键词：城市开放度 ; 创新资源 ; 全球配置 ; 高新产业 英文关键词：City Openness;;Innovative Resources;;Global Allocation;;High-tech Industries 中文刊名：CSFY 英文刊名：Urban Development Studies 机构：中国计量大学经济与管理学院; 出版日期：2019-06-26 出版单位：城市发展研究 年：2019 期：v.26;No.214 基金：浙江省软科学研究计划重点项目“浙江高新产业技术引进路径的全球布局及优化——基于美国对华出口管制背景”(2019C25026);; 杭州市软科学研究一般项目“杭州高新产业创新资源全球配置能力研究”(20180834M25) 语种：中文; 页：CSFY201906026 页数：7 CN：06 ISSN：11-3504/TU 分类号：99-105

摘要

借助外贸依存度和高新产业开放度衡量城市的开放程度,从深度和广度两个层面剖析城市的全球配置创新资源能力,以杭州为例,利用VAR模型测度城市开放度对全球配置创新资源能力的冲击效应。结果表明:杭州城市开放度的提升对全球配置资源的深度的影响逐步趋弱,但对全球配置资源的广度的冲击日益增强。提升高新产业的开放程度,有利于城市提高资本的全球配置能力。为了更好地融入国家"一带一路"倡议,杭州及其他国内城市应该及时从传统的产品全球配置转向资本和技术的全球配置,通过扩大高新产业的对外开放程度、加大创新资本的境外配置和强化高新技术的海外布局来提升全球配置创新资源的能力。
        This paper cited the degree of dependence of foreign trade and the openness of high and new industries to measure the openness of city, and analyzed the city′s global allocation depth and breadth of innovation resources, and selected the VAR model to analyze the impact of the city openness on the global allocation capacity of resources. It was found that the impact of Hangzhou′s openness on the depth of the global allocation of resources is gradually weakening, but the impact on the breadth of the global allocation of resources is increasing. Upgrading the openness of high-tech industries is conducive to improving the capacity of global capital allocation for cities. In order to facilitate the "Belt and Road" national strategy and improve global resource allocation capacity, Hangzhou and other domestic cities should shift from the traditional global cargo trade to the global allocation of capital and technology in time, expand the level of opening of the high and new industries, increase the overseas allocation of capital and strengthen the global layout of high and new technology.

引文

[1] Harris M,Kriebel C H,Raviv A.Asymmetric Information,Incentives and Intrafirm Resource Allocation[J].Management Science,1982,28(6):604-620.
    [2] Diekmann K A,Samuels S M,Ross L,et al.Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation:allocators versus recipients[J].Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,1997,72(5):1061-74.
    [3] Cairns J,Jr.The ethics of global resource allocation[J].Ethics in Science & Environmental Politics,2004,4(1):93-96.
    [4] 傅允生.经济全球化的逻辑进程与中国的选择——基于中美两国的视域[J].学术月刊,2009,41(11):57-66.
    [5] 庄光平.中铝立足全球配置资源[N].中国矿业报,2008-08-26(A03).
    [6] 徐旭红.央企:全球配置资源是战略性选择[N].中国企业报,2010-11-05(001).
    [7] 章玉贵.央企应走向全球配置资源[N].人民日报海外版,2010-09-03(005).
    [8] David Backusa.Taxes and the global allocation of capital[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,2008,55(1):48-61.
    [9] 王雨佳.全球配置资源——供应链为王[N].中国经营报,2012-09-17(E06).
    [10] 余涛.要树立全球配置资源理念[J].中国纺织,2013(07):15.
    [11] Gunchinsuren E.Essays on Factor Returns,Resource Allocation and Economic Development[M].Ohio:The Ohio State University,2015:105-108.
    [12] 郭楚.“走出去”提升广东在全球配置资源的能力[N].南方日报,2015-04-07(FO2).
    [13] 陈佳莹.“浙江资本”全球配置资源[N].浙江日报,2016-03-27(001).
    [14] 广州市社会科学院广州城市战略研究院.广州迈向全球资源配置中心的实施路径[N].中国社会科学报,2018-01-18(004).
    [15] Kassa S M.Three-level global resource allocation model for hiv control:A hierarchical decision system approach[J].Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering,2018,15(1):255-273.
    [16] 国家发改委.中国区域对外开放指数研究报告[R].国家发展改革委国际合作中心.2012.
    [17] 李拯.人民日报评中兴危机:核心技术靠花钱买不来[N].人民日报2018-04-19(002).