多类重力场模型的精度分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Precision analysis of multi class gravity field model 作者：郭春喜 ; 张盼盼 ; 马艳鸽 英文作者：GUO Chunxi;ZHANG Panpan;MA Yange;School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University;Geodetic Data Processing Center,State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping; 关键词：重力场模型 ; 内外符合精度 ; 截断阶次 ; 组合重力场模型 ; 阶方差 英文关键词：gravity field model;;internal and external accuracy;;truncated order;;combined gravity field model;;order variance 中文刊名：CHGC 英文刊名：Engineering of Surveying and Mapping 机构：长安大学地质工程与测绘学院;国家测绘地理信息局大地测量数据处理中心; 出版日期：2019-06-14 出版单位：测绘工程 年：2019 期：v.28 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(41574003);; 国家测绘地理信息局科技创新项目(2018KJ0205) 语种：中文; 页：CHGC201904001 页数：7 CN：04 ISSN：23-1394/TF 分类号：5-10+16

摘要

分析国际公布的EGM2008、GECO和EIGEN-6C4等超高阶重力场模型及GOCO03S、GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R5和GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R5等低阶重力场模型的内符合精度。利用实测的GNSS/水准数据对各模型进行外符合精度的检核。分析6个模型在不同阶次组合的精度,进而选取可靠的截断阶次确定组合重力场模型。计算结果表明:EGM2008、GECO、EIGEN-6C4及DIR_R5四个重力场模型的阶方差均保持在mm级,而GOCO03S在191阶之后的精度达到dm级,TIM_R5模型在228阶之后的精度达到dm级; 6个重力场模型中,EIGEN-6C4模型的累计阶方差最小;EGM2008、GECO模型的互差阶方差在高频部分呈现差异,而在超高阶部分两种模型的互差阶方差符合性好;与EGM2008模型相比,其组合重力场模型高程异常精度最优可达0.063 m,精度提升幅度为15%,与GECO模型相比,其组合重力场模型高程异常精度最优可达0.060 m,精度提升幅度为23%,与EIGEN-6C4模型相比,其对应的组合重力场模型高程异常精度最优可达0.064 m,精度提升幅度为18%,因此,组合重力场模型能提高重力场模型高程异常的精度。
        The internal accuracy of ultra-high order gravity field models EGM2008, GECO, EIGEN-6C4 and low order gravity field models GOCO03S, GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R5 and GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R5 is analyzed. The measured GNSS/level data is used to check the accuracy of each model. This paper analyzes the accuracy of the 6 models in different order combinations, and then selects a reliable truncation order to determine the combined gravity field model. The calculation result shows that the order variance of four gravitational field models of EGM2008, GECO, EIGEN-6C4 and DIR_R5 are all kept at mm level, while the accuracy of GOCO03 S after 191 orders reaches dm level, and the accuracy of TIM_R5 model after 228 order reaches dm level; in the six gravity field models, the cumulative order variance of the EIGEN-6C4 model is the least; the cross order difference of EGM2008 and GECO models shows a great difference in the high-frequency part, while the difference order variance in the two models of super high order shows good consistency. Compared with EGM2008 model, the corresponding combination of gravity field model of height anomaly optimum precision are respectively up to 0.063 m,corresponding to improve the accuracy rate-15%; Compared with GECO model, the corresponding combination of gravity field model of height anomaly optimum precision are respectively up to 0.060 m, corresponding to improve the accuracy rate-23%; Compared with EIGEN-6C4 model, the corresponding combination of gravity field model of height anomaly optimum precision are respectively up to 0.064 m, corresponding to improve the accuracy rate-18%. Therefore, the combination of gravity field model can improve the gravity field model of precision.

引文

[1] 魏子卿,王刚.用地球位模型和GPS/水准数据确定我国大陆似大地水准面[J].测绘学报,2003,32(1):1-5.
    [2] SIMONS M,HAGER B H.Localization of the gravity field and the signature of glacial rebound[J].Nature,1997,390(6659):500-504.
    [3] 张兴福,李博峰,魏德宏,等.多类重力场模型的精度分析及联合确定GPS点正常高的方法[J].测绘学报,2013,42(1):6-12.
    [4] 谭衍涛,黄健鹏,黄国荣,等.重力场模型及GNSS/水准的区域似大地水准面精化[J].测绘科学,2016,41(4):5-9.
    [5] 章传银,郭春喜,陈俊勇,等.EGM 2008地球重力场模型在中国大陆适用性分析[J].测绘学报,2009,38(4):5-11.
    [6] GILARDONI M,REGUZZONI M,SAMPIETRO D.GECO:a global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008[J].Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica,2016,60(2):228-247.
    [7] KOSTELECKY J,KLOKONíK J,BUCHA B,et al.Evaluation of gravity field model EIGEN-6C4 by means of various functions of gravity potential,and by GNSS/levelling[J].2015,14(1):7.
    [8] 郑增记,曹建平,范丽红,等.基于GOCE卫星数据的重力场模型比较研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2014,34(6):109-113.
    [9] 赵德军,徐新强,陈永祥,等.GOCE重力场模型的精度评估[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2015,35(2):322-325.
    [10] 郑增记.基于GOCE重力场模型与地形改正的似大地水准面精化[D].西安:长安大学,2013.
    [11] 周旭华,许厚泽,吴斌,等.用GRACE卫星跟踪数据反演地球重力场[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(3):718-723.
    [12] 徐新强.GOCE+EGM08+RTM组合模型计算高程异常[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2015,35(5):853-856.
    [13] 张英杰,文汉江,王友雷,等.基于重力场模型统一亚太高程基准的方法研究[J].测绘科学,2016,41(12):184-188.
    [14] 王建强,储王宁,戴必旭,等.大地水准面数值计算及结构分析[J].测绘科学,2017,42(4):129-132.