边界想象与族群认同:唐传奇“胡”文化叙事研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Marginalization and Ethnic Identification——The Study of Ethnic Cultural on the Narration of Tang Dynasty 作者：阮丽萍 英文作者：RUAN Li-ping;School of Literature, Southwest University;School of Journalism and Communication, Sichuan International Studies University; 关键词：胡 ; 边界想象 ; 族界标识 ; 族群认同 ; 儒家话语权 英文关键词：Ethnics;;Marginalization;;Ethnics symbol;;clan/Ethnics identification;;Confucian discourse 中文刊名：GZNY 英文刊名：Guizhou Ethnic Studies 机构：西南大学文学院;四川外国语大学新闻传播学院; 出版日期：2019-03-25 出版单位：贵州民族研究 年：2019 期：v.40;No.217 基金：四川外国语大学2018年度科研立项“传统与现代之间:陈寅恪‘新宋学’与中国文化主体性的当代建构”(项目编号:sisu2018035)的阶段性成果 语种：中文; 页：GZNY201903024 页数：6 CN：03 ISSN：52-1001/C 分类号：115-120

摘要

李唐一代为胡汉文化交融的繁荣时期。异质文化交流中,胡族迥异的风俗习惯和文化特色引起中原汉人的好奇和猜测,因此,"胡"文化叙事形成了唐代文学的一大特色。唐传奇作者"作意好奇",对胡族文化特征所呈现的生活方式进行了叙事。经过"文化过滤",传奇作者对胡人胡风的文化叙事中充满了异域想像和边界意识,文士笔下的胡人成为"貌怪""行异""类兽""异心"的集体形象想像物。叙事反映了特定文化群体共享的意义、信仰与价值,作为叙事主体,以文人士大夫为主流话语人群的传奇作者,在完成对胡人身份叙事与族群认同的同时,也完成了自身作为中原儒家文化代表的集体身份认同,在"边界意识"与儒家话语权的心理机制作用下进行胡族文化的历史抒写。
        Emperor Li's Tang Dynasty was a prosperously cultural communicating period for Ethnics and Hans. In this exotically fashioned communication, Hans, dominant habitants of Chinese Middle Plain, were curiously appealed to and mystified by the customs and conventionalities of Ethics. Therefore, Tang's literature had been featured with the Ethnics' cultural narration since. The authors of Tang's legendary literature intentionally exerted their curiosity in the narration of life style presented by Ethics with the cultural refinement recomposed to flatter the local popularity. Exoticism and marginalization are thus replete in their legendary stories in which Ethnics are collectively portrayed as fancies such as "abnormalities","mimic monsters"or "gentiles". Shared by certain clans, the meanings, beliefs and values of their narrations are mirrored in their collective culture. As the narrative subject and the main discourse, the authors of legends, represented by the leveled scholars accomplished their collective identification as the Confucius discourse of Chinese Middle Plain by historically narrating the identification of Ethnics in the way fused by their creative marginalization and the their identity of Confucian discourse.

引文

[1]陈寅恪.唐代政治史述论稿[M].北京:三联书店,1956.
    [2](清)彭定求.全唐诗(卷128)[M].北京:中华书局,1999.
    [3](宋)司马光.资治通鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1956:7493.
    [4]冯秉钧.唐代华化蕃胡考[J].东方杂志,27卷17号,1930.
    [5](明)胡应麟.少室山房笔丛:二酉缀遗(中)卷三十五[M].上海书店,2009.
    [6](宋)李昉等.太平广记·诙谐四(卷248“赵小儿”,出《启颜录》)[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [7](宋)李昉等.太平广记·报应七金刚经.卷108“张政”条,出《报应记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [8](宋)李昉等.太平广记·神二十二.卷312“楚州人”条,出《原化记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [9](宋)李昉等.太平广记·妖怪八.卷366“王宗信”条,出《王氏见闻》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [10](宋)马端临.文献通考(点校本)[M].北京:中华书局,2011.
    [11](宋)李昉等.太平广记·嘲哨三.卷256“邵景”条,出《御史台记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [12](宋)李昉等.太平广记·异僧十.卷96“韦皋”条,出《宣室志》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [13](宋)李昉等.太平广记·方士一.卷76“李淳风”条,出《国史异纂》及《纪闻》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [14](宋)李昉等.太平广记·异僧十.卷96“僧伽大师”条,出《本传》及《纪闻录》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [15](宋)李昉等.太平广记·幻术二.卷285“胡僧“条,出《国朝杂记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [16](宋)李昉等.太平广记·幻术二.卷285“梵僧难陀”条,出《酉阳杂俎》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [17](宋)李昉等.太平广记·神仙二十六.卷26“叶法善”条,出《集异记》及《仙传拾遗》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [18](宋)李昉等.太平广记·龙五.卷422“周邯”条,引《传奇》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [19](宋)李昉等.太平广记·狐三.卷449“李元恭”条,出《广异记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [20](宋)李昉等.太平广记·狐九.卷455“张谨”条,出《稽神录》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [21](宋)李昉等.太平广记·蓄兽九.卷442“王含”条,出《宣室志》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [22]张军.《任氏传》中的“狐女”应当是胡女[J].绍兴文理学院学报,2006,(4).
    [23](法)谢和耐,耿昇.中国社会史[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1995.
    [24](宋)欧阳修、宋祁等撰.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
    [25]孟华.比较文学形象学[M].北京大学出版社,2001.
    [26](宋)赵彦卫.云麓漫钞[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
    [27]王忠.安史之乱前后文学演变问题.清华汉学研究(第三辑)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000.
    [28](宋)李昉等.太平广记·精察一.卷171“苏无名”条,出《纪闻》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [29](宋)李昉等.太平广记·谬误.卷243“萧颖士”条,出《辨疑志》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
    [30]陈寅恪.元白诗笺证稿[M].北京:三联书店,2001.
    [31](宋)李昉等.太平广记·宝三[M].卷402“李勉”条,出《集异记》[M].北京:中华书局,2013.