近二十年(1998-2017)西方翻译社会学研究:回顾与展望
|
摘要
20世纪90年代,翻译学发生了"社会学转向"。但整体来说,目前在西方,翻译社会学还是翻译学的一个新兴领域。本文首先回顾、分析近二十年来西方翻译社会学的整体发文趋势、研究热点与热点演进及高被引文献与高被引作者;然后,本文对西方翻译社会学未来进行了展望及其对我国翻译社会学发展五方面的启示:应加强对Bourdieu的habitus概念以外的社会学理论或概念的研究;应加大对口译的社会学研究;应开展翻译社会学的比较研究;应加大对不同社会背景下翻译的系统性和规律性的描写与解释;应进一步建构翻译社会学的学科体系和理论体系。
In 1990s,Translation Studies took a sociological turn. At present,however,the Sociology of Translation remains a fledgling branch in Translation Studies. The first part of this paper offers a retrospect of the trend,hot topics and their evolution,and the most cited literature and authors in the area from 1998 to 2017 based on the Cite Space system. Then,some relevant discussions concerning the future development of studies in Sociology of Translation are followed and they include: expansion of research aside from Bourdieu's concept of habitus; increase of sociological studies in interpreting; comparative studies in Sociology of Translation; building of the framework of the discipline as well as its theoretical models.
In 1990s,Translation Studies took a sociological turn. At present,however,the Sociology of Translation remains a fledgling branch in Translation Studies. The first part of this paper offers a retrospect of the trend,hot topics and their evolution,and the most cited literature and authors in the area from 1998 to 2017 based on the Cite Space system. Then,some relevant discussions concerning the future development of studies in Sociology of Translation are followed and they include: expansion of research aside from Bourdieu's concept of habitus; increase of sociological studies in interpreting; comparative studies in Sociology of Translation; building of the framework of the discipline as well as its theoretical models.
引文
[1]Abdallah,Kristiina&Kaisa Koskinen.Managing trust:Translating and the network economy[J].Meta,2007(4):673-687.
[2]Bielsa,Esperanca.Cosmopolitanism as translation[J].Cultural Sociology,2014(4):392-406.
[3]Berneking,Steve.A Sociology of translation and the central role of the translator[J].The Bible Translator,2016(3):265-281.
[4]Buzelin,H.&Baraldi,C.Sociology and Translation Studies.Two disciplines meeting[A].In Gambier,Yves.&Luc van Doorslaer,L.(eds.).Border Crossings:Translation Studies and Other Disciplines[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2016:117-140.
[5]Buzelin,Hélène.Unexpected allies:How Latour’s Network Theory could complement Bourdieusian analyses in Translation Studies[J].The Translator,2005(2):193-218.
[6]Chesterman,Andrew.Models in Translation Studies[A].In Gambier,Y.&Doorslaer,L.(eds.).Handbook of Translation Studies(Volume 3)[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2012:108-114.
[7]Croft,William.Typology and Universals[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[8]Dam,Helle.&Karen,Zethsen.Conference interpreters-the stars of the translation profession?A study of the occupational status of Danish EU interpreters as compared to Danish EU translators[J].Interpreting,2013(2):229-259.
[9]Duarte,Joao.et al.(eds.).Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines[M].John Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2006.
[10]Gambier,Yves.Y a-t-il place pour une socio-traductologie?[A].In Wolf,M.&Fukari,A.(eds.).Constructing a Sociology of Translation[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2007:205-217.
[11]Grbic,Nadja.&Michaela Wolf.Common grounds in Translation and Interpreting(Studies)[A].In Gambier,Y.&L,Doorslaer(eds.).Handbook of Translation Studies(Volume 3)[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2012:7-16.
[12]Gouanvic,Jean-Marc.Sociologie de la traduction.La science-fiction americaine dans l’espace culturel francais des annees 1950[M].Arras:Artois Presses Universite,1999.
[13]Gouanvic,Jean-Marc.A Bourdieusian theory of translation,or the coincidence of practical instances:Field,“Habitus,”Capital and“Illusio.”[J].The Translator,2005(2):147-166.
[14]Heilbron,Johan.Translation as a cultural world system[J].Perspectives,2000(1):9-26.
[15]Heilbron,Johan.Towards a sociology of translation.Book translations as a cultural World-System[J].European Journal of Social Theory,1999(4):429-444.
[16]Hekkanen,R.Fields,Networks and Finnish prose:Acomparison of Bourdieusian Field Theory and Actor-Network Theory in Translation Sociology[A].In Dries,D.(ed.).Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2008.http:∥www.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/papers.html
[17]Hermans,Theo.Toury’s empiricism version one[J].The Translator,1995(2):215-223.
[18]Hermans,Theo.Translation as institution[J].In SnellHornby,Mary,Zuzana Jettmarová&Klaus Kaindl(eds.).Translation as Intercultural Communication.Selected Papers From the EST Congress-Prague 1995[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins,1997:3-20.
[19]Holmes,James.The name and nature of Translation Studies[A].In Lawrence Venuti(ed.).The Translation Studies Reader[C].London/New York:Routledge,1972/2000:172-185.
[20]Inghilleri,Moira.Habitus,field and discourse.Interpreting as a socially situated activity[J].Target,2003(2):243-268.
[21]Inghilleri,Moira.Mediating zones of uncertainty:Interpreter agency,the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication[J].The Translator,2005a(1):69-85.
[22]Inghilleri,Moira.The Sociology of Bourdieu and the construction of the‘Object’in Translation and Interpreting Studies[J].The Translator,2005b(2):125-145.
[23]Moghaddam,Esmaeil.Agency in the translation and production of The Adventures of Hajji Baba of Ispahan into Persian[J].Target,2011(2):206-234.
[24]Olohan,Maeve.Science,translation and the mangle:Aperformative conceptualization of scientific translation[J].Meta,2016(1):5-21.
[25]Pym,Anthony,Shlesinger,M.Simeoni,Daneil.Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2008.
[26]Pym,Anthony.Translator associations-from gatekeepers to communities[J].Target,2014(3):466-491.
[27]Sapiro,Gisele.Translation and symbolic capital in the era of globalization:French literature in the United States[J].Cultural Sociology,2015(3):320-346.
[28]Sela-Sheffy,Rakefet.How to be a(recognized)translator.Rethinking habitus,norms,and the field of translation[J].Target,2005(1):1-26.
[29]Simeoni,Daniel.The pivotal status of the translator’s habitus[J].Target,1998(1):1-39.
[30]Tyulenev,Sergey.Why(not)Luhmann?On the applicability of social systems theory to translation studies[J].Translation Studies,2009(2):147-162.
[31]Wolf,Michaela.The female state of the art:Women in the‘translation field’[A].In Pym,A.,M.Shlesinger and Z.Jettmarova(eds.).Sociocultural Aspects of Translating and Interpreting[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins.2006:129-141.
[32]Wolf,Michaela.&Fukari,Alexandra.Constructing a Sociology of Translation[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2007.
[33]Wolf,Michaela.Mapping the field:Sociological perspectives on translation[J].International Journal of the Sociology of Language,2011(1):1-28.
[34]Wolf,Michaela.The sociology of translation and its“activist turn”[J].Translation and Interpreting Studies,2012(2):129-143.
[35]Zwischenberger,Cornelia.Simultaneous conference interpreting and a supernorm that governs it all[J].Meta,2015(1):90-111.
[36]傅敬民.社会学视角的翻译研究:问题与前瞻[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):101-111.
[37]傅敬民.社会学视角翻译研究的现实性[J].外语与外语教学,2018(4):91-97.
[38]李红满.布迪厄与翻译社会学的理论建构[J].中国翻译,2007(5):6-9.
[39]刘立胜.翻译社会学研究:理论、方法与案例分析[J].中国翻译,2015(2):62-65.
[40]刘晓峰,马会娟.社会翻译学主要关键词及其关系诠释[J].上海翻译,2016(5):55-61.
[41]汪宝荣.社会翻译学学科结构与研究框架构建述评[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2017(5):110-118.
[42]覃江华.西方翻译社会学研究的最新进展-《翻译与社会导论》述介[J].上海翻译,2015(1):89-94.
[43]任文,徐寒.社区口译中的场域、惯习和资本-口译研究的社会学视角[J].中国翻译,2013(5):16-22.
[44]邢杰,陈颢琛,程曦.翻译社会学研究二十年:溯源与展望[J].中国翻译,2016(4):14-20.
[45]徐敏慧.从《柏子》英译本结尾的改变谈起-翻译社会学视角[J].中国翻译,2013(4):74-78.
[46]王洪涛.建构“社会翻译学”:名与实的辨析[J].中国翻译,2011(1):14-18.
[47]王洪涛,中国社会翻译学研究十年(2006-2016):思考、回顾与展望[J].上海翻译,2016(5):49-54,55.
[48]王洪涛.“社会翻译学”研究:考辨与反思[J].中国翻译,2016(4):6-13,127.
[49]王洪涛编.社会翻译学研究:理论、视角与方法[C].天津:南开大学出版社,2017.
[50]武光军.翻译社会学研究的现状与问题[J].外国语,2008(1):75-82.
[51]杨超.建国初《人民日报》翻译讨论的翻译社会学考察[J].外语研究,2017(5):66-69.
[52]杨晓华.翻译社会学的理论构架与研究---以中国语言服务产业为例[J].上海翻译,2011(3):7-12.
[53]仲伟合,冯曼.翻译社会学视角下文化外译研究体系的建构[J].外语研究,2014(3):57-62.
[2]Bielsa,Esperanca.Cosmopolitanism as translation[J].Cultural Sociology,2014(4):392-406.
[3]Berneking,Steve.A Sociology of translation and the central role of the translator[J].The Bible Translator,2016(3):265-281.
[4]Buzelin,H.&Baraldi,C.Sociology and Translation Studies.Two disciplines meeting[A].In Gambier,Yves.&Luc van Doorslaer,L.(eds.).Border Crossings:Translation Studies and Other Disciplines[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2016:117-140.
[5]Buzelin,Hélène.Unexpected allies:How Latour’s Network Theory could complement Bourdieusian analyses in Translation Studies[J].The Translator,2005(2):193-218.
[6]Chesterman,Andrew.Models in Translation Studies[A].In Gambier,Y.&Doorslaer,L.(eds.).Handbook of Translation Studies(Volume 3)[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2012:108-114.
[7]Croft,William.Typology and Universals[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
[8]Dam,Helle.&Karen,Zethsen.Conference interpreters-the stars of the translation profession?A study of the occupational status of Danish EU interpreters as compared to Danish EU translators[J].Interpreting,2013(2):229-259.
[9]Duarte,Joao.et al.(eds.).Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines[M].John Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2006.
[10]Gambier,Yves.Y a-t-il place pour une socio-traductologie?[A].In Wolf,M.&Fukari,A.(eds.).Constructing a Sociology of Translation[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2007:205-217.
[11]Grbic,Nadja.&Michaela Wolf.Common grounds in Translation and Interpreting(Studies)[A].In Gambier,Y.&L,Doorslaer(eds.).Handbook of Translation Studies(Volume 3)[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Benjamins,2012:7-16.
[12]Gouanvic,Jean-Marc.Sociologie de la traduction.La science-fiction americaine dans l’espace culturel francais des annees 1950[M].Arras:Artois Presses Universite,1999.
[13]Gouanvic,Jean-Marc.A Bourdieusian theory of translation,or the coincidence of practical instances:Field,“Habitus,”Capital and“Illusio.”[J].The Translator,2005(2):147-166.
[14]Heilbron,Johan.Translation as a cultural world system[J].Perspectives,2000(1):9-26.
[15]Heilbron,Johan.Towards a sociology of translation.Book translations as a cultural World-System[J].European Journal of Social Theory,1999(4):429-444.
[16]Hekkanen,R.Fields,Networks and Finnish prose:Acomparison of Bourdieusian Field Theory and Actor-Network Theory in Translation Sociology[A].In Dries,D.(ed.).Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2008.http:∥www.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/papers.html
[17]Hermans,Theo.Toury’s empiricism version one[J].The Translator,1995(2):215-223.
[18]Hermans,Theo.Translation as institution[J].In SnellHornby,Mary,Zuzana Jettmarová&Klaus Kaindl(eds.).Translation as Intercultural Communication.Selected Papers From the EST Congress-Prague 1995[C].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins,1997:3-20.
[19]Holmes,James.The name and nature of Translation Studies[A].In Lawrence Venuti(ed.).The Translation Studies Reader[C].London/New York:Routledge,1972/2000:172-185.
[20]Inghilleri,Moira.Habitus,field and discourse.Interpreting as a socially situated activity[J].Target,2003(2):243-268.
[21]Inghilleri,Moira.Mediating zones of uncertainty:Interpreter agency,the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication[J].The Translator,2005a(1):69-85.
[22]Inghilleri,Moira.The Sociology of Bourdieu and the construction of the‘Object’in Translation and Interpreting Studies[J].The Translator,2005b(2):125-145.
[23]Moghaddam,Esmaeil.Agency in the translation and production of The Adventures of Hajji Baba of Ispahan into Persian[J].Target,2011(2):206-234.
[24]Olohan,Maeve.Science,translation and the mangle:Aperformative conceptualization of scientific translation[J].Meta,2016(1):5-21.
[25]Pym,Anthony,Shlesinger,M.Simeoni,Daneil.Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2008.
[26]Pym,Anthony.Translator associations-from gatekeepers to communities[J].Target,2014(3):466-491.
[27]Sapiro,Gisele.Translation and symbolic capital in the era of globalization:French literature in the United States[J].Cultural Sociology,2015(3):320-346.
[28]Sela-Sheffy,Rakefet.How to be a(recognized)translator.Rethinking habitus,norms,and the field of translation[J].Target,2005(1):1-26.
[29]Simeoni,Daniel.The pivotal status of the translator’s habitus[J].Target,1998(1):1-39.
[30]Tyulenev,Sergey.Why(not)Luhmann?On the applicability of social systems theory to translation studies[J].Translation Studies,2009(2):147-162.
[31]Wolf,Michaela.The female state of the art:Women in the‘translation field’[A].In Pym,A.,M.Shlesinger and Z.Jettmarova(eds.).Sociocultural Aspects of Translating and Interpreting[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins.2006:129-141.
[32]Wolf,Michaela.&Fukari,Alexandra.Constructing a Sociology of Translation[C].Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2007.
[33]Wolf,Michaela.Mapping the field:Sociological perspectives on translation[J].International Journal of the Sociology of Language,2011(1):1-28.
[34]Wolf,Michaela.The sociology of translation and its“activist turn”[J].Translation and Interpreting Studies,2012(2):129-143.
[35]Zwischenberger,Cornelia.Simultaneous conference interpreting and a supernorm that governs it all[J].Meta,2015(1):90-111.
[36]傅敬民.社会学视角的翻译研究:问题与前瞻[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):101-111.
[37]傅敬民.社会学视角翻译研究的现实性[J].外语与外语教学,2018(4):91-97.
[38]李红满.布迪厄与翻译社会学的理论建构[J].中国翻译,2007(5):6-9.
[39]刘立胜.翻译社会学研究:理论、方法与案例分析[J].中国翻译,2015(2):62-65.
[40]刘晓峰,马会娟.社会翻译学主要关键词及其关系诠释[J].上海翻译,2016(5):55-61.
[41]汪宝荣.社会翻译学学科结构与研究框架构建述评[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2017(5):110-118.
[42]覃江华.西方翻译社会学研究的最新进展-《翻译与社会导论》述介[J].上海翻译,2015(1):89-94.
[43]任文,徐寒.社区口译中的场域、惯习和资本-口译研究的社会学视角[J].中国翻译,2013(5):16-22.
[44]邢杰,陈颢琛,程曦.翻译社会学研究二十年:溯源与展望[J].中国翻译,2016(4):14-20.
[45]徐敏慧.从《柏子》英译本结尾的改变谈起-翻译社会学视角[J].中国翻译,2013(4):74-78.
[46]王洪涛.建构“社会翻译学”:名与实的辨析[J].中国翻译,2011(1):14-18.
[47]王洪涛,中国社会翻译学研究十年(2006-2016):思考、回顾与展望[J].上海翻译,2016(5):49-54,55.
[48]王洪涛.“社会翻译学”研究:考辨与反思[J].中国翻译,2016(4):6-13,127.
[49]王洪涛编.社会翻译学研究:理论、视角与方法[C].天津:南开大学出版社,2017.
[50]武光军.翻译社会学研究的现状与问题[J].外国语,2008(1):75-82.
[51]杨超.建国初《人民日报》翻译讨论的翻译社会学考察[J].外语研究,2017(5):66-69.
[52]杨晓华.翻译社会学的理论构架与研究---以中国语言服务产业为例[J].上海翻译,2011(3):7-12.
[53]仲伟合,冯曼.翻译社会学视角下文化外译研究体系的建构[J].外语研究,2014(3):57-62.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |