用户名: 密码: 验证码:
无锡市慢性病示范区创建5年间居民慢性病防治素养变化情况分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Changes in health literacy for chronic diseases among residents in Wuxi City after the five-year implementation on demonstration areas for comprehensive prevention and control of non-communicable diseases
  • 作者:马文娟 ; 陈再芳 ; 王璐 ; 须凡帆 ; 钱云 ; 王礼华
  • 英文作者:MA Wen-juan;CHEN Zai-fang;WANG Lu;XU Fan-fan;QIAN Yun;WANG Li-hua;Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
  • 关键词:健康素养 ; 慢性病 ; 预防控制 ; 居民 ; 评估
  • 英文关键词:Health literacy;;Non-communicable diseases;;Prevention and control;;Residents;;Evaluation
  • 中文刊名:ZGJK
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Health Education
  • 机构:无锡市疾病预防控制中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-25 11:50
  • 出版单位:中国健康教育
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35
  • 基金:无锡市卫生计生委青年项目(Q201735);; 无锡市医学重点学科(ZDXK010)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGJK201904012
  • 页数:4
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-2513/R
  • 分类号:50-53
摘要
目的分析无锡市慢性病综合防控示范区创建5年期间的居民慢性病防治素养水平变化特点,为深化慢性病示范区建设和进一步制定慢性病健康素养促进策略和措施提供科学依据。方法采用2012年和2017年无锡市15~69岁城乡居民健康素养监测数据,对不同特征居民的慢性病防治素养变化进行对比分析。结果无锡市居民慢性病防治素养水平由2012年的12. 71%增长至2017年的28.06%。与2012年相比,2017年的慢性病防治素养水平在小学及以下文化程度组(9.35%vs.11.78%)、农民职业组(11.28%vs. 13.36%)和自评健康状况较差组(19.23%vs.22.83%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在其他不同人口学特征组居民中均有提高(P<0.05)。居民慢性病防治素养水平的提升幅度,在不同人口特征居民组不同。结论无锡市慢性病防控示范区创建5年间,整体上居民的慢性病防治素养水平有了大幅提升,但是提升效果在不同人口特征居民中存在不均衡性。
        Objective To evaluate the changes of health literacy for chronic diseases among residents in Wuxi City after the five-year implementation on demonstration areas for comprehensive prevention and control of non-communicable diseases,and to provide scientific basis for policy and intervention strategies. Methods Using the health literacy monitoring data among urban and rural residents aged 15-69 years old in Wuxi in 2012 and 2017, and the changes of health literacy for chronic diseases during the five years were compared. Results The literacy for chronic diseases increased from 12. 71% in 2012 to 28. 06% in 2017. Compared with 2012, the literacy level for chronic diseases in 2017 showed no significant difference(P > 0. 05) in primary school and lower education group(9.35% vs. 11.78%), farmer occupation group(11. 28% vs. 13. 36%) and self-reported poor health status group( 19. 23% vs. 22. 83%), but in other groups it had notable increase(P<0. 05) and the increased degree in each group was not same. Conclusion Five years after the implementation on the demonstration areas for comprehensive prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, the overall level of health literacy for chronic diseases among residents has gotten outstanding improvement, but the improvement is diversity among different characteristic groups.
引文
[1]孔灵芝.关于当前我国慢性病防治工作的思考[J].中国卫生政策研究,2012,5(1):2-5.
    [2]刘云祥.无锡市慢性病综合防控的策略与实践[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2015,26(5):134-136.
    [3]李英华,毛群安,石琦,等.2012年中国居民健康素养监测结果[J].中国健康教育,2015,31(2):99-103.
    [4]张娟,靳荣荣,李娟娟,等.国家慢性病综合防控示范区实施效果研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(4):394-400.
    [5]李娟娟,李晋磊,张娟,等.国家慢性病综合防控示范区建设总体实施现状研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(4):417-421.
    [6] Kickbusch IS. Health literacy:addressing the health and education divide[J]. Health Promot Int,2001,16(3):289-297.
    [7] Nutbeam D. Defining and measuring health literacy:what can we learn from literacy studies[J]. Int J Public Health, 2009,54(5):303-305.
    [8]聂雪琼,李英华,陶茂萱,等.中国居民慢性病防治素养水平及其影响因素[J].中国健康教育,2015,31(2):108-111.
    [9]吴敬,李莉,李英华,等.2016年中国居民慢性病防治素养水平及其影响因素[J].中国健康教育,2018,34(5):404-408.
    [10]刘志浩,李小宁,黄明豪,等.江苏省居民健康素养状况及影响因素分析[J].中国健康教育,2011,27(11):824-827.
    [11]严丽萍,魏南方,解瑞谦,等.我国城乡居民健康素养影响因素分析[J].中国健康教育,2012,28(1):8-11.
    [12] Smith SK,Nutbeam D,McCaffery KJ. Insights into the concept and measurement of health literacy from a study of shared decision-making in a low literacy population[J]. J Health Psychol, 2013,18(8):1011-1022.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700