基于改进解释结构模型的爆炸性粉尘作业场所风险评价

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Study on Risk Factors of Metal Dust Explosion Accidents Based on ISM and AHP 作者：张延松 ; 张毓媛 ; 张公妍 英文作者：ZHANG Yansong;ZHANG Yuyuan;ZHANG Gongyan;College of Mining and Safety Engineering,Shandong University of Science and Technology; 关键词：解释结构模型(ISM) ; 爆炸性粉尘 ; 风险因素 ; 风险评价 英文关键词：interpretation structure model (ISM);;explosive dust;;risk factor;;risk assessment 中文刊名：GYAF 英文刊名：Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection 机构：山东科技大学矿业与安全工程学院;山东科技大学矿山灾害预防控制-省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地; 出版日期：2019-04-10 出版单位：工业安全与环保 年：2019 期：v.45 基金：国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0801700、2017YFC0805200) 语种：中文; 页：GYAF201904009 页数：5 CN：04 ISSN：42-1640/X 分类号：38-42

摘要

为了对爆炸性粉尘作业场所进行风险评价,从环境、设备、组织管理三个层面分析爆炸性粉尘爆炸作业场所的安全隐患。采用改进解释结构模型(ISM)分析各个风险因素之间的二元关系,构建3级递阶结构模型,将模型中各层级的影响因素赋予权重值并整合计算,得到权重分析表。结果表明:粉尘爆炸作业场所的风险因素主要分为表层因素、中间因素和深层因素三个层面,这三个层面主要与企业的积尘措施、动火作业制度、安全意识和安全检查制度有关。创新性地在传统解释结构模型的基础上进行权重的赋值计算,将定性和定量分析的方法相结合,在很大程度上弥补了传统方法的弊端,所得到的结果更具科学性。
        In order to evaluate the risk of explosive dust workplaces the hidden dangers of explosive dust workplaces are analyzed from three aspects of environment, equipment and organization and management. The improved Interpretative Structural Model(ISM) is applied to analyze the binary relationship among risk factors, and construct a three-level hierarchical structure model, in which the influencing factors of each level in the model are given weight value and integrated calculation to obtain the weight analysis table. The results show that the risk factors of dust explosion workplace are mainly divided into three levels, surface factors, intermediate factors and deep factors and these three levels are mainly related to dust accumulation measures, fire operation system, safety awareness and safety inspection system. The assignment of weights is carried out novelty on the basis of traditional interpretation of structural modes, combined with qualitative and quantitative analysis methods, it can largely remedy the drawbacks of traditional methods, and the results obtained are more scientific.

引文

[1]夏晨曦,韩辉,李伟敏.基于贝叶斯网络的粉尘爆炸多米诺效应分析[J].化工进展,2016,35(S2):110-115.
    [2]王爽英,吴超,左红艳.中小型煤矿生产安全模糊层次分析评价模型及其应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,41(5):1918-1922.
    [3]王从陆,吴超,李树清.基于解释结构模型的事故原因层次分析[J].矿业研究与开发,2004(5):77-79.
    [4]张若江,张新国,白继文,等.膏体充填材料配比试验与水化反应机理研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(6):62-68.
    [5]韦伟.工业铝粉尘二次爆炸的预防性研究[J].科技风,2018(33):155.
    [6]钱松.粉尘爆炸事故的统计数据分析[J].电气防爆,2018(3):1-3,6.
    [7]吴银花.浅析粉尘爆炸预防及控制措施[J].化工管理,2018(27):45-46.
    [8]张小良,何锐,宋慧娟,等.可燃性粉尘通风除尘工程实施要点探讨[J].工业安全与环保,2018,44(9):52-55,71.
    [9]蔡卫,吴兵.层次分析法在矿井通风评价中的应用[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2005(2):149-152.