“资源诅咒”视角下环境规制、能源禀赋对区域碳排放的影响
|
摘要
"资源诅咒"一直是资源型区域经济研究中备受关注的问题。随着绿色经济时代的到来,关注经济与环境的和谐发展成为热点话题,研究"资源诅咒"在环境领域的存在性对推动绿色经济的发展具有现实意义和理论价值。本文利用省级面板数据,通过验证在环境规制调节作用下能源禀赋与碳排放的关系,考察"资源诅咒"在环境领域是否存在。研究结果表明,从全国视角看,能源禀赋与碳排放具有显著正相关关系,即环境领域存在"资源诅咒"现象,但有效的环境规制能够缓解甚至消除这一现象。按能源禀赋贫富分区域看,能源富集区的能源禀赋与碳排放呈显著正相关关系,即存在显著的"资源诅咒"现象,且环境规制能够有效缓解这一现象;在能源贫乏区则不存在"资源诅咒"现象。按经济发展水平分区域看,中部地区的能源禀赋与碳排放呈显著正相关关系,即"资源诅咒"现象明显,且有效的环境规制具有显著的调节作用;东部和西部地区的能源禀赋与碳排放呈正相关关系,但不显著。进一步通过分阶段探讨环境领域"资源诅咒"现象发现,经济发展水平与环境领域"资源诅咒"现象之间存在"倒U型"关系,环境领域"资源诅咒"现象主要存在于经济发展中期阶段。通过研究本文认为,环境领域存在显著的"资源诅咒"现象,有效的环境规制能够明显改善并消除这一现象,资源驱动型经济发展模式是导致环境领域存在"资源诅咒"现象的原因。
The resource curse has always been a concern in the study of resource-based regional economy. With the advent of the era of green economy,attention to the harmonious development of the economy and the environment has become the core topic. It is of practical significance and theoretical value to study the existence of resource curse in environmental field to promote the development of green economy. This paper uses the provincial panel data to verify the relationship between energy endowment and carbon emissions under the regulation of environmental regulation,and to investigate whether the resource curse exists in the environmental field. The results show that from the national perspective,energy endowment and carbon emissions have a significant positive correlation; that is,there is a resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field,but effective environmental regulations can alleviate or even eliminate this phenomenon. According to the energy endowment of the rich and the poor,the energy endowment of the energy-rich area has a significant positive correlation with carbon emissions; that is,there is a significant resource curse phenomenon,and environmental regulations can effectively alleviate this phenomenon,but there is no resource curse phenomenon in the energy-poor areas. According to the economic development level,the energy endowment in the central region has a significant positive correlation with carbon emissions; that is,the phenomenon of resource curse is obvious,and effective environmental regulations have a significant regulatory role. Energy endowments in the eastern and western areas are positively correlated with carbon emissions,but not significantly. It is found that there is an‘inverted U-type'relationship between the level of economic development and the resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field. The resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field mainly exists in the middle stage of economic development. Through the research results,this paper thinks that there is a significant ‘resource curse ' phenomenon in the environmental field,and effective environmental regulation can obviously improve and eliminate this phenomenon. The resource-driven economic development model is the cause of the‘resource curse'phenomenon in the environmental field.
The resource curse has always been a concern in the study of resource-based regional economy. With the advent of the era of green economy,attention to the harmonious development of the economy and the environment has become the core topic. It is of practical significance and theoretical value to study the existence of resource curse in environmental field to promote the development of green economy. This paper uses the provincial panel data to verify the relationship between energy endowment and carbon emissions under the regulation of environmental regulation,and to investigate whether the resource curse exists in the environmental field. The results show that from the national perspective,energy endowment and carbon emissions have a significant positive correlation; that is,there is a resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field,but effective environmental regulations can alleviate or even eliminate this phenomenon. According to the energy endowment of the rich and the poor,the energy endowment of the energy-rich area has a significant positive correlation with carbon emissions; that is,there is a significant resource curse phenomenon,and environmental regulations can effectively alleviate this phenomenon,but there is no resource curse phenomenon in the energy-poor areas. According to the economic development level,the energy endowment in the central region has a significant positive correlation with carbon emissions; that is,the phenomenon of resource curse is obvious,and effective environmental regulations have a significant regulatory role. Energy endowments in the eastern and western areas are positively correlated with carbon emissions,but not significantly. It is found that there is an‘inverted U-type'relationship between the level of economic development and the resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field. The resource curse phenomenon in the environmental field mainly exists in the middle stage of economic development. Through the research results,this paper thinks that there is a significant ‘resource curse ' phenomenon in the environmental field,and effective environmental regulation can obviously improve and eliminate this phenomenon. The resource-driven economic development model is the cause of the‘resource curse'phenomenon in the environmental field.
引文
[1]FRIEDLINGSTEIN P,ANDREW R M,ROGELJ J,et al.Persistent growth of CO2emissions and implications for reaching climate targets[J].Nature geoscience,2014,7(10):709-715.
[2]WANG C,CHEN J,ZOU J.Decomposition of energy:related CO2emission in China:1957-2000[J].Energy,2005,30(1):73-83.
[3]林伯强,刘希颖.中国城市化阶段的碳排放:影响因素和减排策略[J].经济研究,2010,45(8):66-78.
[4]赵欣,龙如银.江苏省碳排放现状及因素分解实证分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(7):25-30.
[5]宋杰鲲.基于LMDI的山东省能源消费碳排放因素分解[J].资源科学,2012,34(1):35-41.
[6]王兆华,杨琳.基于生态足迹的我国居民间接能源消费研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(10):128-135.
[7]曹俊文,姜雯昱.基于LMDI的电力行业碳排放影响因素分解研究[J].统计与决策,2018(14):128-131.
[8]赵忠秀,闫云凤,裴建锁.生产分割、区域间贸易与CO2排放:基于IRIO模型的研究[J].管理评论,2018,30(5):47-57.
[9]卢娜,冯淑怡,陆华良.中国城镇化对建筑业碳排放影响的时空差异[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(3):8-17.
[10]何凌云,程怡,范若滢,等.国内能源相对价格对碳排放的价格杠杆作用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(11):1-11.
[11]邱强,顾尤莉.国际能源价格波动对我国碳排放影响的效应研究---基于岭回归分析[J].国际商务研究,2017,38(5):35-46.
[12]郭正权,张兴平,郑宇花.能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2018(11):22-30.
[13]张伟,朱启贵,高辉.产业结构升级、能源结构优化与产业体系低碳化发展[J].经济研究,2016,51(12):62-75.
[14]李绍萍,柳光明,张学敏.东北老工业基地碳排放与能源结构关系的实证研究[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(8):938-941.
[15]林伯强,吴微.中国现阶段经济发展中的煤炭需求[J].中国社会科学,2018(2):141-161,207-208.
[16]段宏波,张古鹏,范英,等.基于内生能源效率改进的宏观减排结构分析[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(7):10-23.
[17]梁晓捷,王兵,张皓,等.钢铁行业能源效率与碳排放[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,18(2):34-38.
[18]潘雅茹,罗良文.政府干预、资源禀赋与中国能源效率测度[J].江汉论坛,2017(11):35-41.
[19]AUTY R M.Sustaining development in mineral economies:the resource curse thesis[M].London:Routledge,1993:77-78.
[20]NING D,BARRY C F.Natural resources abundance and economic growth[J].Land economics,2005,81(4):496-502.
[21]张志刚.耕地资源与经济增长之间的关系研究---基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证检验[J].农业技术经济,2018(6):127-135.
[22]徐晓亮,程倩,车莹.中国区域“资源诅咒”再检验---基于空间动态面板数据模型的分析[J].中国经济问题,2017(3):29-37.
[23]BULTE E H,DAMANIA R,DEACON R T.Resource intensity,institutions,and development[J].World development,2005,33(7):1029-1044.
[24]崔艳娟,李延喜,陈克兢.外部治理环境对盈余质量的影响:自然资源禀赋是“诅咒”吗[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(2):172-181,191.
[25]苏方国,卢宁,罗旖颀,等.“资源福音”还是“资源诅咒”---政治关联、税收优惠对企业研发投入的影响[J].广西社会科学,2017(10):126-131.
[26]鲁金萍.广义“资源诅咒”的理论内涵与实证检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(1):133-138.
[27]李跃,张瑞鑫,任一鑫,等.煤基产业树构建与应用研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(11):172-176.
[28]陈占明,吴施美,马文博,等.中国地级以上城市二氧化碳排放的影响因素分析:基于扩展的STIRPAT模型[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):45-54.
[29]郭杰,丁冠乔,刘晓曼,等.城镇景观格局对区域碳排放影响及其差别化管控研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):55-61.
[30]姚顺波,韩久保.基于资源丰裕和资源依赖不同视角下的“资源诅咒”问题再检验---以陕西省10个地市面板数据为例[J].经济经纬,2017,34(5):14-19.
[31]张翠菊,柏群,张文爱.中国区域碳排放强度影响因素及空间溢出性---基于空间杜宾模型的研究[J].系统工程,2017,35(10):70-78.
[32]宋马林,王舒鸿.环境规制、技术进步与经济增长[J].经济研究,2013,48(3):122-134.
[33]钱争鸣,刘晓晨.环境管制、产业结构调整与地区经济发展[J].经济学家,2014(7):73-81.
[34]李跃,张士强,张翼.考虑非能耗的煤炭产业碳排放驱动因素研究---基于LMDI模型的实证分析[J].江苏社会科学,2017(01):23-31.
[2]WANG C,CHEN J,ZOU J.Decomposition of energy:related CO2emission in China:1957-2000[J].Energy,2005,30(1):73-83.
[3]林伯强,刘希颖.中国城市化阶段的碳排放:影响因素和减排策略[J].经济研究,2010,45(8):66-78.
[4]赵欣,龙如银.江苏省碳排放现状及因素分解实证分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(7):25-30.
[5]宋杰鲲.基于LMDI的山东省能源消费碳排放因素分解[J].资源科学,2012,34(1):35-41.
[6]王兆华,杨琳.基于生态足迹的我国居民间接能源消费研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(10):128-135.
[7]曹俊文,姜雯昱.基于LMDI的电力行业碳排放影响因素分解研究[J].统计与决策,2018(14):128-131.
[8]赵忠秀,闫云凤,裴建锁.生产分割、区域间贸易与CO2排放:基于IRIO模型的研究[J].管理评论,2018,30(5):47-57.
[9]卢娜,冯淑怡,陆华良.中国城镇化对建筑业碳排放影响的时空差异[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(3):8-17.
[10]何凌云,程怡,范若滢,等.国内能源相对价格对碳排放的价格杠杆作用[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(11):1-11.
[11]邱强,顾尤莉.国际能源价格波动对我国碳排放影响的效应研究---基于岭回归分析[J].国际商务研究,2017,38(5):35-46.
[12]郭正权,张兴平,郑宇花.能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2018(11):22-30.
[13]张伟,朱启贵,高辉.产业结构升级、能源结构优化与产业体系低碳化发展[J].经济研究,2016,51(12):62-75.
[14]李绍萍,柳光明,张学敏.东北老工业基地碳排放与能源结构关系的实证研究[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(8):938-941.
[15]林伯强,吴微.中国现阶段经济发展中的煤炭需求[J].中国社会科学,2018(2):141-161,207-208.
[16]段宏波,张古鹏,范英,等.基于内生能源效率改进的宏观减排结构分析[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(7):10-23.
[17]梁晓捷,王兵,张皓,等.钢铁行业能源效率与碳排放[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,18(2):34-38.
[18]潘雅茹,罗良文.政府干预、资源禀赋与中国能源效率测度[J].江汉论坛,2017(11):35-41.
[19]AUTY R M.Sustaining development in mineral economies:the resource curse thesis[M].London:Routledge,1993:77-78.
[20]NING D,BARRY C F.Natural resources abundance and economic growth[J].Land economics,2005,81(4):496-502.
[21]张志刚.耕地资源与经济增长之间的关系研究---基于“资源诅咒”假说的实证检验[J].农业技术经济,2018(6):127-135.
[22]徐晓亮,程倩,车莹.中国区域“资源诅咒”再检验---基于空间动态面板数据模型的分析[J].中国经济问题,2017(3):29-37.
[23]BULTE E H,DAMANIA R,DEACON R T.Resource intensity,institutions,and development[J].World development,2005,33(7):1029-1044.
[24]崔艳娟,李延喜,陈克兢.外部治理环境对盈余质量的影响:自然资源禀赋是“诅咒”吗[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(2):172-181,191.
[25]苏方国,卢宁,罗旖颀,等.“资源福音”还是“资源诅咒”---政治关联、税收优惠对企业研发投入的影响[J].广西社会科学,2017(10):126-131.
[26]鲁金萍.广义“资源诅咒”的理论内涵与实证检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(1):133-138.
[27]李跃,张瑞鑫,任一鑫,等.煤基产业树构建与应用研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(11):172-176.
[28]陈占明,吴施美,马文博,等.中国地级以上城市二氧化碳排放的影响因素分析:基于扩展的STIRPAT模型[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):45-54.
[29]郭杰,丁冠乔,刘晓曼,等.城镇景观格局对区域碳排放影响及其差别化管控研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):55-61.
[30]姚顺波,韩久保.基于资源丰裕和资源依赖不同视角下的“资源诅咒”问题再检验---以陕西省10个地市面板数据为例[J].经济经纬,2017,34(5):14-19.
[31]张翠菊,柏群,张文爱.中国区域碳排放强度影响因素及空间溢出性---基于空间杜宾模型的研究[J].系统工程,2017,35(10):70-78.
[32]宋马林,王舒鸿.环境规制、技术进步与经济增长[J].经济研究,2013,48(3):122-134.
[33]钱争鸣,刘晓晨.环境管制、产业结构调整与地区经济发展[J].经济学家,2014(7):73-81.
[34]李跃,张士强,张翼.考虑非能耗的煤炭产业碳排放驱动因素研究---基于LMDI模型的实证分析[J].江苏社会科学,2017(01):23-31.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |