用户名: 密码: 验证码:
景观多功能性:概念辨析、近今进展与前沿议题
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Landscape multifunctionality: concept clarification, recent progress, and frontier issues
  • 作者:刘焱序 ; 傅伯杰
  • 英文作者:LIU Yanxu;FU Bojie;State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University;State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:多功能景观 ; 生态系统服务 ; 景观可持续性 ; 自然资源管理 ; 前沿议题
  • 英文关键词:multifunctional landscape;;ecosystem services;;landscape sustainability;;natural resource management;;frontier issues
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:北京师范大学地理科学学部地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室;中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-23
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFA0604701);; 中国博士后科学基金项目(2018T110066,2017M620029);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201908001
  • 页数:10
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:5-14
摘要
景观多功能性是指景观同时提供多种功能,且不同功能间存在相互作用的特性。良好的景观多功能性可以有效提升区域人类福祉,使景观多功能性成为一项典型的人地耦合研究议题。然而,概念不明确、计量方法粗略、实践应用较少是当前制约景观多功能性研究继续深化的重要障碍。通过明晰景观多功能性与生态系统功能、生态系统服务、土地功能、景观服务、景观可持续性等近似概念的逻辑关系,梳理近年来国际上农业景观多功能性、城市景观多功能性以及其他具有区域特色的景观多功能性研究进展,发现格局-过程-服务-可持续性的级联研究链条已逐渐显现。未来景观多功能性研究有待基于供需原理优化景观功能评估指标与方法,正确认知景观功能主导性与多样性的关系,探究可持续发展目标达成的多目标协同途径,为国土空间优化提供理论、方法与实践指引。
        Landscape multifunctionality refers to the characteristic of landscapes in which they provide multiple different functions, which interact with each other, at the same time. Good landscape multifunctionality can effectively improve regional human well-being, making landscape multifunctionality a typical topic of human-land coupling research. However, vague concepts, rough measurement methods, and a lack of practical application are major obstacles to the further development of landscape multifunctionality research. This study clarified the concepts and the logical relationships among ecosystem function, ecosystem service, land function, landscape service, and landscape sustainability. International studies in recent years classified as agricultural landscape multifunctionality, urban landscape multifunctionality, and other and others featuring regional landscape multifunctionality have been reviewed. The cascade research chain of "pattern, process, service, sustainability" has gradually emerged. Four frontier issues were set in this study, comprising the following: optimizing the indicators and methods of landscape function evaluation based on the principle of supply and demand; correctly understanding the relationship between the dominance and diversity of landscape function; exploring a multi-objective collaborative approach to achieve sustainable development goals; and providing theoretical, methodological, and practical guidance for the optimization of national territory development.
引文
[1] 彭建,吕慧玲,刘焱序,陈昕,胡晓旭.国内外多功能景观研究进展与展望.地球科学进展,2015,30(4):465-476.
    [2] Mastrangelo M E,Weyland F,Villarino S H,Barral M P,Nahuelhual L,Laterra P.Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services.Landscape Ecology,2014,29(2):345-358.
    [3] Soini K.Exploring human dimensions of multifunctional landscapes through mapping and map-making.Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,57(3/4):225-239.
    [4] O′Farrell P J,Anderson P M L.Sustainable multifunctional landscapes:a review to implementation.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2010,2(1/2):59-65.
    [5] Termorshuizen J W,Opdam P.Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development.Landscape Ecology,2009,24(8):1037-1052.
    [6] Wu J G.Landscape sustainability science:ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes.Landscape Ecology,2013,28(6):999-1023.
    [7] Willemen L,Hein L,van Mensvoort M E F,Verburg P H.Space for people,plants,and livestock?Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region.Ecological Indicators,2010,10(1):62-73.
    [8] Kienast F,Bolliger J,Potschin M,de Groot R S,Verburg P H,Heller I,Wascher D,Haines-Young R.Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data:insights gained from a prototype development for Europe.Environmental Management,2009,44(6):1099-1120.
    [9] Gulickx M M C,Verburg P H,Stoorvogel J J,Kok K,Veldkamp A.Mapping landscape services:a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in the Netherlands.Ecological Indicators,2013,24:273-283.
    [10] Hermann A,Kuttner M,Hainz-Renetzeder C,Konkoly-Gyuró é,Tirászi á,Brandenburg C,Allex B,Ziener K,Wrbka T.Assessment framework for landscape services in European cultural landscapes:an Austrian Hungarian case study.Ecological Indicators,2014,37:229-240.
    [11] Ungaro F,Zasada I,Piorr A.Mapping landscape services,spatial synergies and trade-offs.A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany.Ecological Indicators,2014,46:367-378.
    [12] Queiroz C,Meacham M,Richter K,Norstr?m A V,Andersson E,Norberg J,Peterson G.Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.Ambio,2015,44 Suppl 1:89-101.
    [13] Stürck J,Verburg P H.Multifunctionality at what scale?A landscape multifunctionality assessment for the European Union under conditions of land use change.Landscape Ecology,2017,32(3):481-500.
    [14] Frei B,Renard D,Mitchell M G E,Seufert V,Chaplin-Kramer R,Rhemtulla J M,Bennett E M.Bright spots in agricultural landscapes:identifying areas exceeding expectations for multifunctionality and biodiversity.Journal of Applied Ecology,2018,55(6):2731-2743.
    [15] 傅伯杰,吕一河,陈利顶,苏常红,姚雪玲,刘宇.国际景观生态学研究新进展.生态学报,2008,28(2):798-804.
    [16] 周华荣.干旱区湿地多功能景观研究的意义与前景分析.干旱区地理,2005,28(1):16-20.
    [17] 吕一河,马志敏,傅伯杰,高光耀.生态系统服务多样性与景观多功能性——从科学理念到综合评估.生态学报,2013,33(4):1153-1159.
    [18] Wu J S,Feng Z,Gao Y,Peng J.Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services:a case study on an area with intensive human activities.Ecological Indicators,2013,29:529-537.
    [19] Fry G L A.Multifunctional landscapes—towards transdisciplinary research.Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,57(3/4):159-168.
    [20] Jax K.Function and “functioning” in ecology:what does it mean?Oikos,2005,111(3):641-648.
    [21] 刘焱序,傅伯杰,赵文武,王帅.生态资产核算与生态系统服务评估:概念交汇与重点方向.生态学报,2018,38(23):8267-8276.
    [22] Verburg P H,van de Steeg J,Veldkamp A,Willemen L.From land cover change to land function dynamics:a major challenge to improve land characterization.Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(3):1327-1335.
    [23] Paracchini M L,Pacini C,Jones M L M,Pérez-Soba M.An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options.Ecological Indicators,2011,11(1):71-80.
    [24] Liu C,Xu Y Q,Huang A,Liu Y X,Wang H,Lu L H,Sun P L,Zheng W R.Spatial identification of land use multifunctionality at grid scale in farming-pastoral area:a case study of Zhangjiakou City,China.Habitat International,2018,76:48-61.
    [25] 傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合.地理学报,2014,69(8):1052-1059.
    [26] 汤茜,丁圣彦.多功能景观研究进展.生态学报,2014,34(12):3151-3157.
    [27] 王紫雯.多功能景观概念在可持续景观规划中的运用.城市规划,2008,32(2):27-33.
    [28] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,刘焱序,田璐.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策.地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.
    [29] 赵文武,刘月,冯强,王亚萍,杨思琪.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务.地理科学进展,2018,37(1):139-151.
    [30] Huang J,Tichit M,Poulot M,Darly S,Li S C,Petit C,Aubry C.Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture.Journal of Environmental Management,2015,149:138-147.
    [31] Holt A R,Alix A,Thompson A,Maltby L.Food production,ecosystem services and biodiversity:we can′t have it all everywhere.Science of the Total Environment,2016,573:1422-1429.
    [32] Smith H F,Sullivan C A.Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—farmers′ perceptions.Ecological Economics,2014,98:72-80.
    [33] Bernués A,Rodríguez-Ortega T,Alfnes F,Clemetsen M,Eik L O.Quantifying the multifunctionality of fjord and mountain agriculture by means of sociocultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services.Land Use Policy,2015,48:170-178.
    [34] Willemen L,Veldkamp A,Verburg P H,Hein L,Leemans R.A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics.Journal of Environmental Management,2012,100:86-95.
    [35] Peng J,Liu Y X,Liu Z C,Yang Y.Mapping spatial non-stationarity of human-natural factors associated with agricultural landscape multifunctionality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,China.Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2017,246:221-233.
    [36] Landis D A.Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services.Basic and Applied Ecology,2017,18:1-12.
    [37] Von Haaren C,Saathoff W,Galler C.Integrating climate protection and mitigation functions with other landscape functions in rural areas:a landscape planning approach.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2012,55(1):59-76.
    [38] Nilsson L,Andersson G K S,Birkhofer K,Smith H G.Ignoring ecosystem-service cascades undermines policy for multifunctional agricultural landscapes.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,2017,5:109.
    [39] Yang Z S,Cai J M,Sliuzas R.Agro-tourism enterprises as a form of multi-functional urban agriculture for peri-urban development in China.Habitat International,2010,34(4):374-385.
    [40] Zasada I.Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming.Land Use Policy,2011,28(4):639-648.
    [41] Baró F,Gómez-Baggethun E,Haase D.Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient:Insights for landscape planning and management.Ecosystem Services,2017,24:147-159.
    [42] Balzan M V,Caruana J,Zammit A.Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes:evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state.Land Use Policy,2018,75:711-725.
    [43] Lovell S T,Taylor J R.Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States.Landscape Ecology,2013,28(8):1447-1463.
    [44] Meerow S,Newell J P.Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure:growing resilience in Detroit.Landscape and Urban Planning,2017,159:62-75.
    [45] Verdú-Vázquez A,Fernández-Pablos E,Lozano-Diez R V,López-Zaldívar ó.Development of a methodology for the characterization of urban and periurban green spaces in the context of supra-municipal sustainability strategies.Land Use Policy,2017,69:75-84.
    [46] Peng J,Chen X,Liu Y X,Lü H L,Hu X X.Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,China.Applied Geography,2016,74:170-181.
    [47] Liquete C,Kleeschulte S,Dige G,Maes J,Grizzetti B,Olah B,Zulian G.Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks:a Pan-European case study.Environmental Science & Policy,2015,54:268-280.
    [48] Yang B,Li M H,Li S J.Design-with-nature for multifunctional landscapes:environmental benefits and social barriers in community development.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2013,10(11):5433-5458.
    [49] Carvalho-Ribeiro S M,Lovett A,O′Riordan T.Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal:moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development.Land Use Policy,2010,27(4):1111-1122.
    [50] Irauschek F,Rammer W,Lexer M J.Can current management maintain forest landscape multifunctionality in the Eastern Alps in Austria under climate change?Regional Environmental Change,2017,17(1):33-48.
    [51] Lovell S T,Dupraz C,Gold M,Jose S,Revord R,Stanek E,Wolz K J.Temperate agroforestry research:considering multifunctional woody polycultures and the design of long-term field trials.Agroforestry Systems,2018,92(5):1397-1415.
    [52] Tzilivakis J,Warner D J,Green A,Lewis K A,Angileri V.An indicator framework to help maximise potential benefits for ecosystem services and biodiversity from ecological focus areas.Ecological Indicators,2016,69:859-872.
    [53] Turner K G,Odgaard M V,B?cher P K,Dalgaard T,Svenning J C.Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark:trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape.Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,125:89-104.
    [54] Lund J F,Jensen F S.Is recreational hunting important for landscape multi-functionality?Evidence from Denmark.Land Use Policy,2017,61:389-397.
    [55] Dosskey M,Wells G,Bentrup G,Wallace D.Enhancing ecosystem services:designing for multifunctionality.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,67(2):37A-41A.
    [56] Brown I,Castellazzi M.Scenario analysis for regional decision-making on sustainable multifunctional land uses.Regional Environmental Change,2014,14(4):1357-1371.
    [57] Freeman O E,Duguma L A,Minang P A.Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice.Ecology and Society,2015,20(1):24.
    [58] Fu B J,Wei Y P.Editorial overview:keeping fit in the dynamics of coupled natural and human systems.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2018,33:A1-A4.
    [59] 傅伯杰.地理学:从知识、科学到决策.地理学报,2017,72(11):1923-1932.
    [60] Fu B J,Zhang L W,Xu Z H,Zhao Y,Wei Y P,Skinner D.Ecosystem services in changing land use.Journal of Soils and Sediments,2015,15(4):833-843.
    [61] Hamann M,Biggs R,Reyers B.Mapping social-ecological systems:identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use.Global Environmental Change,2015,34:218-226.
    [62] Kroll F,Müller F,Haase D,Fohrer N.Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics.Land Use Policy,2012,29(3):521-535.
    [63] 肖玉,谢高地,鲁春霞,徐洁.基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展.生态学报,2016,36(10):3096-3102.
    [64] 李双成,王珏,朱文博,张津,刘娅,高阳,王阳,李琰.基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架.地理学报,2014,69(11):1628-1639.
    [65] Malinga R,Gordon L J,Jewitt G,Lindborg R.Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents:A review.Ecosystem Services,2015,13:57-63.
    [66] Liu Y X,Fu B J,Wang S,Zhao W W.Global ecological regionalization:from biogeography to ecosystem services.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2018,33:1-8.
    [67] 刘焱序,傅伯杰,王帅,赵文武.从生物地理区划到生态功能区划——全球生态区划研究进展.生态学报,2017,37(23):7761-7768.
    [68] Peng J,Hu X X,Qiu S J,Hu Y N,Meersmans J,Liu Y X.Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area.Science of the Total Environment,2019,660:765-775.
    [69] Gao L,Bryan B A.Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability.Nature,2017,544(7649):217-222.
    [70] Li Y,Kalnay E,Motesharrei S,Rivas J,Kucharski F,Kirk-Davidoff D,Bach E,Zeng N.Climate model shows large-scale wind and solar farms in the Sahara increase rain and vegetation.Science,2018,361(6406):1019-1022.
    [71] 陈利顶,刘洋,吕一河,冯晓明,傅伯杰.景观生态学中的格局分析:现状、困境与未来.生态学报,2008,28(11):5521-5531.
    [72] 赵文武,房学宁.景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学.生态学报,2014,34(10):2453-2459.
    [73] 陈利顶,李秀珍,傅伯杰,肖笃宁,赵文武.中国景观生态学发展历程与未来研究重点.生态学报,2014,34(12):3129-3141.
    [74] Liu Y X,Fu B J,Zhao W W,Wang S,Deng Y.A solution to the conflicts of multiple planning boundaries:landscape functional zoning in a resource-based city in China.Habitat International,2018,77:43-55.
    [75] 陈利顶,景永才,孙然好.城市生态安全格局构建:目标、原则和基本框架.生态学报,2018,38(12):4101-4108.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700