基于区位熵灰色关联度的团体标准空间集聚评估
|
摘要
团体标准是标准体系改革的重要成果。目前我国团体标准数量大幅增加,但对其产业结构和区域分布缺乏有效评估。基于全国2 803条团体标准数据,通过区位熵值反映团体标准发展的区域结构及其变动情况,运用灰色关联度评估其发展一致性。研究结果表明:第一产业的团体标准有资源依赖性,第二产业的团体标准建设领先于其他产业但存在行业偏好,第三产业的团体标准区域布局不平衡,其中山东、辽宁和江苏的团体标准结构与全国的一致性较高;此外,电力、热力、燃气及水生产和供应业,信息传输业、软件和信息技术服务业以及建筑业在各区域的行业异质性较小。
Association standard is an important achievement in the reform of standard system. At present, the number of association standards in our country increases greatly, but its industrial structure and regional distribution are lack of effective evaluation. Based on the data of 2 803 association standards in China, the regional structure and its variation of the development of association standards are reflected by the value of location entropy, and their development consistency is evaluated by means of grey correlation degree. The results show that: The association standard of the primary industry is resource-dependent. The construction of the association standard of the secondary industry is ahead of other industries, but there is an industry preference. The regional distribution of association standards in the tertiary industry is unbalanced, in which the association standard structures in Shandong, Liaoning and Jiangsu are highly consistent with the whole country;in addition, the sectors of electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply,information transmission, software and information technology services and construction are less heterogeneous across regions.
Association standard is an important achievement in the reform of standard system. At present, the number of association standards in our country increases greatly, but its industrial structure and regional distribution are lack of effective evaluation. Based on the data of 2 803 association standards in China, the regional structure and its variation of the development of association standards are reflected by the value of location entropy, and their development consistency is evaluated by means of grey correlation degree. The results show that: The association standard of the primary industry is resource-dependent. The construction of the association standard of the secondary industry is ahead of other industries, but there is an industry preference. The regional distribution of association standards in the tertiary industry is unbalanced, in which the association standard structures in Shandong, Liaoning and Jiangsu are highly consistent with the whole country;in addition, the sectors of electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply,information transmission, software and information technology services and construction are less heterogeneous across regions.
引文
[1]侯俊军,白杨.物联网标准供给不足问题研究:以关键技术标准发展为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(12):61-66.
[2]刘三江.标准竞合理论模型[D].武汉:武汉大学,2016:23-40.
[3]张米尔,姜福红.创立标准的结盟行为及对自主标准的作用研究[J].科学学研究,2009,27(4):529-534.
[4]王艳林,陈俊华.大标准化时代与《标准化法》之修改:以政府职能转变为中心的讨论[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2017,32(3):1-12.
[5]方放,吴慧霞.团体标准设定的公共治理模式研究[J].中国软科学,2017(2):66-75.
[6]晏绍庆,路欢欢.我国联盟标准的特征与趋势分析[J].中国标准化,2014(1):54-56.
[7]朱翔华团体标准制定主体的法律地位之思考[J].标准科学,2017(7):13-17.
[8]韩子燕,李键.团体标准维度探析及其实施条件:基于《中华人民共和国标准化法(修订草案)》的思考[J].标准科学,2017(7):6-12.
[9]李佳.我国团体标准发展现状分析:基于全国团体标准信息平台数据[J].标准科学,2017(5):23-27.
[10]赵剑男,张勇,周立军.我国团体标准市场机制理论模型研究[J].标准科学,2017(2):21-27.
[11]陈晓峰.长三角生产性服务业集聚的水平测度与效率评价:兼以金融业为例的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2014(2):59-67.
[12]邱灵,方创琳.北京市生产性服务业空间集聚综合测度[J].地理研究,2013,32(1):99-110.
[13]CLIFF A,HAGGETT P.The impact of GIS on epidemiological mapping and modelling[M]//LONGLEY P,BATTY M.Spatial analysis modelling in a GIS environment.Gambridge:Geoinformation International,1996.
[14]MOINEDDIN R,BEYENE J,BOYLE E.On the location quotient confidence interval[J].Geographical Analysis,2003,35(3):249-256.
[15]CHIANG S H.Location quotient and trade[J].Annals of Regional Science,2009,43(2):399-414.
[16]BERAWI M A,ZAGLOEL T Y,MIRAJ P,et al.Producing alternative concept for the trans-Sumatera toll road project development using location quotient method[J].Procedia Engineering,2017,171:265-273.
[17]DENG J L.Control problems of grey systems[J].Systems&Control Letters,1982,1(5):288-294.
[18]DENG J L.Properties of relational space for grey systems[M].Beijing:China Oceam Press,1988:1-13.
[19]LIU S,FORREST J,VALLEE R.Emergence and development of grey systems theory[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics&Astronautics,2004,38(7/8):1246-1256.
[20]KAYACAN E,ULUTAS B,KAYNAK O.Grey system theorybased models in time series prediction[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(2):1784-1789.
[21]YIN M S.Fifteen years of grey system theory research:a historical review and bibliometric analysis[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2013,40(7):2767-2775.
[22]文淑惠,黄丽芳.基于灰色关联度的云南省产业结构趋同性研究[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(6):51-56.
[23]李爱真.基于灰色关联度的河南省产业集聚水平分析[J].河南师范大学学报(自然版),2013,41(4):36-39.
[24]沈映春,闫佳琪.京津冀都市圈产业结构与城镇空间模式协同状况研究:基于区位熵灰色关联度和城镇空间引力模型[J].产业经济评论,2015(6):23-34.
[25]刘怡,周凌云,耿纯.京津冀产业协同发展评估:基于区位熵灰色关联度的分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(12):119-129.
[2]刘三江.标准竞合理论模型[D].武汉:武汉大学,2016:23-40.
[3]张米尔,姜福红.创立标准的结盟行为及对自主标准的作用研究[J].科学学研究,2009,27(4):529-534.
[4]王艳林,陈俊华.大标准化时代与《标准化法》之修改:以政府职能转变为中心的讨论[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2017,32(3):1-12.
[5]方放,吴慧霞.团体标准设定的公共治理模式研究[J].中国软科学,2017(2):66-75.
[6]晏绍庆,路欢欢.我国联盟标准的特征与趋势分析[J].中国标准化,2014(1):54-56.
[7]朱翔华团体标准制定主体的法律地位之思考[J].标准科学,2017(7):13-17.
[8]韩子燕,李键.团体标准维度探析及其实施条件:基于《中华人民共和国标准化法(修订草案)》的思考[J].标准科学,2017(7):6-12.
[9]李佳.我国团体标准发展现状分析:基于全国团体标准信息平台数据[J].标准科学,2017(5):23-27.
[10]赵剑男,张勇,周立军.我国团体标准市场机制理论模型研究[J].标准科学,2017(2):21-27.
[11]陈晓峰.长三角生产性服务业集聚的水平测度与效率评价:兼以金融业为例的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2014(2):59-67.
[12]邱灵,方创琳.北京市生产性服务业空间集聚综合测度[J].地理研究,2013,32(1):99-110.
[13]CLIFF A,HAGGETT P.The impact of GIS on epidemiological mapping and modelling[M]//LONGLEY P,BATTY M.Spatial analysis modelling in a GIS environment.Gambridge:Geoinformation International,1996.
[14]MOINEDDIN R,BEYENE J,BOYLE E.On the location quotient confidence interval[J].Geographical Analysis,2003,35(3):249-256.
[15]CHIANG S H.Location quotient and trade[J].Annals of Regional Science,2009,43(2):399-414.
[16]BERAWI M A,ZAGLOEL T Y,MIRAJ P,et al.Producing alternative concept for the trans-Sumatera toll road project development using location quotient method[J].Procedia Engineering,2017,171:265-273.
[17]DENG J L.Control problems of grey systems[J].Systems&Control Letters,1982,1(5):288-294.
[18]DENG J L.Properties of relational space for grey systems[M].Beijing:China Oceam Press,1988:1-13.
[19]LIU S,FORREST J,VALLEE R.Emergence and development of grey systems theory[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics&Astronautics,2004,38(7/8):1246-1256.
[20]KAYACAN E,ULUTAS B,KAYNAK O.Grey system theorybased models in time series prediction[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(2):1784-1789.
[21]YIN M S.Fifteen years of grey system theory research:a historical review and bibliometric analysis[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2013,40(7):2767-2775.
[22]文淑惠,黄丽芳.基于灰色关联度的云南省产业结构趋同性研究[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(6):51-56.
[23]李爱真.基于灰色关联度的河南省产业集聚水平分析[J].河南师范大学学报(自然版),2013,41(4):36-39.
[24]沈映春,闫佳琪.京津冀都市圈产业结构与城镇空间模式协同状况研究:基于区位熵灰色关联度和城镇空间引力模型[J].产业经济评论,2015(6):23-34.
[25]刘怡,周凌云,耿纯.京津冀产业协同发展评估:基于区位熵灰色关联度的分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(12):119-129.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |