国家重大科技基础设施的学术产出评价研究:以德国亥姆霍兹联合会科技基础设施为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Output evaluation of large research infrastructures:case study on Helmholtz Association 作者：李宜展 ; 刘细文 英文作者：Li Yizhan;Liu Xiwen;National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences;School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 关键词：重大科技基础设施 ; 投入产出绩效评价 ; 科学计量绩效评价 ; 德国亥姆霍兹联合会 英文关键词：large research infrastructure;;input and output performance;;scientometric performance evaluation;;Helmholtz Association 中文刊名：ZKJJ 英文刊名：Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China 机构：中国科学院文献情报中心;中国科学院大学经济与管理学院; 出版日期：2019-05-15 出版单位：中国科学基金 年：2019 期：v.33;No.152 语种：中文; 页：ZKJJ201903016 页数：8 CN：03 ISSN：11-1730/N 分类号：107-114

摘要

国家重大科技基础设施是国家科技创新能力的象征,其运行绩效评价是一个普遍性难题,缺乏有效评价框架。本文以德国亥姆霍兹联合会为例,从投入和产出角度入手,采用科学计量方法和可视化方法,从财政投入、人力资源投入,科技产出的总体规模、前沿突破、影响力、学科交叉与融合、科技传播与交流、对产业技术的支撑等方面,评估德国重大科技基础设施的学术成果产出和运行绩效。
        Large research infrastructure is the symbol of the country's science and technology innovation abilities,and its performance evaluation is a general problem owing to lacking of an effective evaluation tools or models.In this study,eight institutions of Helmholtz Association were selected to analyze their performance of input and output with scientometrics and visualization methods,including financial input,human resources input,scale of scientific and technological output,cutting-edge breakthroughs,academic influences,multidisciplinary cross and fusion,knowledge exchange and contributions to industry.

引文

[1]王贻芳.建设国际领先的大科学装置,奠定科技强国的基础.中国科学院院刊,2017,32(5):483-487.
    [2]陈套,冯锋.大科学装置集群效应及管理启示.西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,35(1):61-66.
    [3]Department for Business,Energy&Industrial Strategy.International Comparative Study:Appraisal and Evaluation Practices of Science Capital Spending on Research Infrastructures.2017-07.https://www.gov.uk/governmen t/publications/science-capital-spending-on-research-infrastru ctures-appraisal-and-evaluation-practices
    [4]Office of science of DOE.Facilities for the future of science a twenty-year outlook.http://science.energy.gov/news/science-headlines.2018-12-20
    [5]陈娟,周华杰,樊潇潇,等.重大科技基础设施的开放管理.中国科技资源导刊,2016,48(4):6-13.
    [6]刘梦菡,张楠,白蓓,等.转化医学国家重大科技基础设施的开放式创新初探.华西医学,2018,33(12):1530-1534.
    [7]吴思多,辛胜昌,涂欢,等.浅析各国大科学装置管理机制对我国的启示.科技资讯,2018,(10):137.
    [6]朱星.德国最大的科研组织-德国亥姆霍兹国家研究中心联合会.中国基础科学,2001,(6):54-60.
    [7]张治河,冯陈澄,李斌,等.科技投入对国家创新能力的提升机制研究.科研管理,2014,35(4):149-160.
    [8]Helmholtz Association.About Us Facts and Figures.https://www.helmholtz.de/en/about_us/the_association/facts_and_figures.(2018-01-01)[2018-08-19].
    [9]Helmholtz Associations.The Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers Annual Report 2017.https://www.helmholtz.de/en/current_topics/press_and_media/media_centre/helmholtz_annual_report/.(2017-09)[2018-06-11].
    [10]吴建国.德国国立科研机构经费配置管理模式研究.科研管理,2009,30(5):117-123.
    [11]DESY.DESY to strengthen cooperation with Israeli partners.http://www.desy.de/news/news_search/index_eng.html?openDirectAnchor=1392&two_columns=0.(2018-05-02)[2018-06-11].
    [12]AWI.Bayer Climate Award 2010 for Professor Peter Lemke.https://www.awi.de/nc/en/about-us/service/press/press-release/bayer-climate-award-2010-for-professorpeter-lemke.html.(2010-03-25)[2018-06-11].
    [13]Sun L,Yin Y.Discovering themes and trends in transportation research using topic modeling.Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies,2017,77:49-66.
    (1)多学科交叉的分类是基于科睿唯安WOK的学科领域交叉分类体系。
    (1)AC=(DE)and DPR>=(19910101)AND DPR<=(20171231);TI数据库DWPI专利同族。