系统评价再评价撰写注意事项

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Introduction to the Writing Method of Overview of Systematic Reviews 作者：田金徽 英文作者：TIAN Jin-hui;Evidence-based Medicine Center,Evidence-based Nursing Center,Lanzhou University; 关键词：系统评价再评价 ; 撰写 ; 报告 英文关键词：Overviews of systematic reviews;;Writing;;Report 中文刊名：YAPJ 英文刊名：Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation 机构：兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学循证护理中心; 出版日期：2019-02-28 出版单位：中国药物评价 年：2019 期：v.36 基金：兰州大学2015教学研究项目(项目编号:201525;项目名称:本科教学中“任务驱动”项目教学法的研究与实践——以循证医学课程为例);; 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170203;项目名称:循证医学方法学研究) 语种：中文; 页：YAPJ201901001 页数：4 CN：01 ISSN：10-1056/R 分类号：5-8

摘要

介绍撰写系统评价再评价的步骤及注意问题,以期系统评价再评价撰写者提供借鉴与参考。
        This paper mainly introduces the steps and attention problems of writing overviews of systematic reviews,which may be help for researcher.

引文

[1]田金徽,李伦.网状Meta分析方法与实践[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2017:1-10.
    [2]田金徽,陈耀龙,杨克虎,等.SR/MA研究进展与挑战[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2016,42(1):42-47.
    [3]杨克虎,刘雅莉,袁金秋,等.发展和完善中的“系统评价再评价”[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2011,(1):321-324.
    [4]Hunt H,Pollock A,Campbell P,et al.An introduction to overviews of reviews:planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview[J].Syst Rev,2018,7(1):39.
    [5]Mc Kenzie JE,Brennan SE.Overviews of systematic reviews:great promise,greater challenge[J].Syst Rev,2017,6(1):185.
    [6]Bougioukas KI,Bouras E,Apostolidou-Kiouti F,et al.Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2019,106:70-79.
    [7]Pollock A,Campbell P,Brunton G,et al.Selecting and implementing overview methods:implications from five exemplar overviews[J].Syst Rev,2017,6(1):145.
    [8]Pieper D,Pollock M,Fernandes RM,et al.Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published2012-2016:protocol for a systematic review[J].Syst Rev,2017,6(1):73.
    [9]Pollock M,Fernandes RM,Hartling L.Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions[J].Syst Rev,2017,17(1):48.
    [10]Büchter RB,Pieper D.Most overviews of Cochrane reviews neglected potential biases from dual authorship[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2016,77:91-94.
    [11]Ballard M,Montgomery P.Risk of bias in overviews of reviews:a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist[J].Res Synth Methods,2017,8(1):92-108.
    [12]Bougioukas KI,Bouras E,Apostolidou-Kiouti F,et al.Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2019,106:70-79.
    [13]Bougioukas KI,Liakos A,Tsapas A,et al.Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist:a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2018,93:9-24.