贵阳市空气质量多模式预报系统PM_(2.5)预报效果评估

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Evaluation of PM_(2.5) forecast performance of air quality multi-mode forecast system in Guiyang City 作者：张春辉 ; 王琴 ; 钟敏文 ; 赵晓韵 ; 徐徐 ; 刘群 英文作者：Zhang Chunhui;Wang Qin;Zhong Minwen;Zhao Xiaoyun;Xu Xu;Liu Qun;Guiyang Ambient Air Quality Prediction and Forecast Center; 关键词：贵阳市 ; 多模式 ; 空气质量预报 ; 评估 英文关键词：Guiyang City;;multi-model;;air quality forecast;;evaluation 中文刊名：GZHB 英文刊名：Environmental Protection and Technology 机构：贵阳市环境空气质量预测预报中心; 出版日期：2019-04-15 出版单位：环保科技 年：2019 期：v.25;No.107 语种：中文; 页：GZHB201902006 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：52-1143/X 分类号：31-36

摘要

介绍了贵阳市多模式空气质量数值预报系统,并评估其对2017年贵阳市PM_(2.5)日均浓度的未来24小时以及7天潜势预报效果。评估结果表明:各模式基本能预测出PM_(2.5)的浓度变化趋势,但量级与实测值仍有偏差,对峰值和低值的预报仍有不足;综合来看,集成模式预报效果相较于其它模式更稳定(FAC最高,为82%),WRF-chem预报显著高估了PM_(2.5)的浓度,其预报效果最差(FAC最低,为64%);对比模式7天预报时效效果,前5天预报结果的相关系数较好(r均在0. 6左右),可作为PM_(2.5)业务预报的支撑。
        The multi-mode air quality numerical forecasting system of Guiyang City was introduced,and its forecast performance on the future 24-hour and 7-day potential of PM_(2.5) daily average concentration in Guiyang in 2017 was evaluated. The evaluation results show that each model can basically predict the trend of PM_(2.5) concentration,but the magnitude is still deviated from the actual measured value,and there are still insufficient predictions for peak and low values. In general,the integrated model forecasting effect is better than other models and are more stable( the highest in the FAC,82%),and the WRF-chem forecast significantly overestimates the concentration of PM_(2.5),with the worst prediction( FAC is the lowest,64%); the comparison of 7-day forecast results revealed that the previous 5-day had better prediction result when the correlation coefficient r is around 0. 6,this meant that the multi-mode forecast system could be used for daily forecasting.

引文

[1]国务院办公厅.打赢蓝天保卫战三年行动计划[R].北京:国务院办公厅,2018.
    [2]徐文帅,李云婷,吴其重,等.AQI标准下北京市空气质量数值预报系统及其在重大活动保障中的应用[J].中国环境监测,2016,32(2):11-19.
    [3]陆涛.上海世博会长三角区域空气质量预警联动系统开发与应用[J].中国环境监测,2013,29(01):141-146.
    [4]杨晓春,吴其重,赵荣,等.西安空气质量预报系统业务运行评估[J].陕西气象,2015(05):41-43.
    [5]马琳,魏巍,张稳定,等.2016年秋季新乡市空气质量模式预报效果评估[J].中国环境监测,2017,33(05):89-94.
    [6]蒋争明,徐迅宇,陈吟晖,等.空气质量多模式预报系统在中山市的应用[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(04):34-43.
    [7]Chang J C,Hanna S R.Air quality model performance evaluation[J].Meteor.Atmos.Phys,2004,87:167-196.
    [8]王占山,李云婷,孙峰,等.北京市空气质量预报体系介绍及红色预警支撑[J].环境科技,2016,29(02):38-42.
    [9]胡鸣,赵倩彪,伏晴艳,等.上海环境空气质量预报考核评分方法研究和应用[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(4):54-57.
    [10]张金谱,梁桂雄,冯彪,等.广州市污染季节空气质量预报效果评估及误差分析[J].环境监控与预警,2018,10(02):40-44.
    [11]陈焕盛,王自发,吴其重,等.空气质量多模式系统在广州应用及对PM10预报效果评估[J].气候与环境研究,2013,18(04):427-435.
    [12]高璟赟,杨宁,毕温凯,等.天津市基于新标准的空气质量预报模型效果评估[J].环境监控与预警,2016,8(06):9-14.
    [13]张春辉,马琳达.2003-2014年贵阳市环境空气质量变化趋势分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2016,33(05):432-434.
    [14]朱莉莉,晏平仲,王自发,等.江苏省级区域空气质量数值预报模式效果评估[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(02):17-23.