摘要
本文对测定水中阿特拉津的两种方法(高效液相色谱法和超高效液相色谱-三重四级杆串联质谱法)进行了比较。结果表明,在一定浓度范围内,两种方法的标准工作曲线线性均良好;两种方法的检出限均符合《地表水环境质量标准》的要求;精密度也均符合实验方法要求;方法也均具有较强的抗干扰能力;两种方法加标回收率分别为85.1%-98.5%和95.0%-105%,相对标准偏差分别为1.8%-3.7%和2.0%-3.6%。
This paper set up a comparision of determination of atrazine in water by high performance liquid chromatography and ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The results showed that,In a certain concentration range,the standard working curve linear of the two methods were all good;the instrument detection limits of two methods were in line with the " Environmental quality standards for surface water ". The precision experiments also met the requirement of the experiment method. And the two methods had strong anti-interference abilities. The recovery rates of two methods were in the range of 85.1-98.5% and 95.0-105%,RSD were in the range of 1.8%-3.7% and 2.0%-3.6%.
引文
[1] G RAYMORE M,S TAGNITTI F,ALLINSON G. Impact s of atrazine in aquatic ecosystems[J]. Environment In ternational,2001,26(7/8):483-495.
[2] HOPENHA YN R C,STUMP M L,BROWNING S R. Regional assessment of atrazine exposure and incidence of breast and ovarian cancers in Kentucky[J]. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2002,42(1):127-136.
[3]孙睿华.固相膜萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水中的阿特拉津和甲萘威[J].净水技术,2014,33(s2):15-18.
[4]关天耀.固相萃取-气相色谱质谱联用法测定地表水中的阿特拉津[J].化学工程师,2017(7):23-28.
[5]王绍臣,张剑平.超高效液相色谱-串联四级杆质谱法快速测定阿特拉津、甲萘威、微囊藻毒素LR、丙烯酰胺和联苯胺[J].环境科学与管理,2016,41(10):111-113.
[6]国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S],北京:中国标准出版社,2002.