基于DPSIR模型的衡水湖湿地生态环境质量评价

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality of Hengshui Lake Wetlands based on DPSIR Model 作者：王贺年 ; 张曼胤 ; 崔丽娟 ; 郭子良 ; 王大安 英文作者：WANG Henian;ZHANG Manyin;CUI Lijuan;GUO Ziliang;WANG Daan;Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry;Beijing Key Laboratory of Wetland Services and Restoration; 关键词：湿地 ; 生态环境质量 ; DPSIR模型 ; 衡水湖 英文关键词：wetland;;ecological environment quality;;DPSIR model;;Hengshui Lake 中文刊名：KXSD 英文刊名：Wetland Science 机构：中国林业科学研究院湿地研究所;湿地生态功能与恢复北京市重点实验室; 出版日期：2019-04-15 出版单位：湿地科学 年：2019 期：v.17 基金：国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0503804)资助 语种：中文; 页：KXSD201902010 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：22-1349/P 分类号：73-78

摘要

湿地生态环境质量评价研究对湿地管理具有重要的意义。以衡水湖湿地作为评价对象,采用驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应(driving-pressure-state-impact-response,DPSIR)模型,筛选出15个指标,构建了湿地生态环境质量评价指标体系,得到各指标的隶属度矩阵;应用模糊综合评价法,对衡水湖湿地的生态环境质量进行评价。研究结果表明,衡水湖湿地生态环境质量综合评价指数为0.663 9,处于Ⅱ级(较好),即该湿地生态环境质量状况较好;从项目层面来看,驱动力层、压力层、状态层、影响层和响应层的生态环境质量分别处于Ⅲ级(一般)、Ⅰ级(很好)、Ⅲ级(一般)、Ⅱ级(较好)和Ⅰ级(很好);对衡水湖湿地生态环境质量产生负面影响的要素主要为衡水湖水体中的总氮含量和周围空气负离子含量。
        The evaluation on ecological environment quality of the wetlands is of great significance to wetland management. Taking Hengshui Lake wetlands as the evaluation object, the driving-pressure-state-impactresponse(DPSIR) model was used, 15 indicators were selected, and the evaluation index system was constructed, and then the membership degree matrix of each index was obtained. The ecological environment quality of Hengshui Lake wetlands was evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Then the results showed that the comprehensive evaluation index of ecological environment quality of Hengshui Lake wetlands was 0.663 9, which was in gradeⅡ(better), and the ecological environment quality of the wetlands was good. At the project level, the ecological environment quality of the driving, pressure, state, impact and response layers were at grade III(generic), I(best), III(generic), II(better) and I(best), respectively. The main factors that have a negative impact on the ecological environment quality of Hengshui Lake wetlands were the total nitrogen content and the negative air ion concentration.

引文

[1]刘红玉,赵志春.中国湿地资源及其保护研究[J].资源科学,1999, 211(6):34-37.
    [2]吴健生,张茜,曹祺文.快速城市化地区湿地生态安全评价——以深圳市为例[J].湿地科学, 2017, 1155(3):321-328.
    [3]韩子钧,刘贤安,赵丹,等.四川省湿地生态状况分级与综合评价[J].湿地科学, 2016, 144(5):641-647.
    [4]中国环境监测总站.中国生态环境质量评价研究[J].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2004.
    [5]王丽梅,孟范平,郑纪勇,等.黄土高原区域农业生态系统环境质量评价[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 1155(3):425-428.
    [6]易平涛,李雪,周莹,等.生态城市评价指标的筛选模型及应用[J].东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 3388(8):1211-1216.
    [7]黄备,邵君波,孟伟杰,等.利用PSR模型的椒江河口生态系统环境质量评价[J].湿地科学, 2016, 1144(6):825-831.
    [8]欧阳勋志,廖为明.生态环境监测与评价探讨[J].江西农业大学学报, 2002, 2244(3):350-354.
    [9]陈曦,苏芳莉,芦晓峰,等.基于模糊数学的双台河口湿地水质综合评价[J].节水灌溉, 2011,(5):45-48.
    [10]闫峰,刘凌,徐丽娜,等.隶属度向量分析法在河流健康评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学, 2012,(10):30-32.
    [11]高俊刚,吴雪,张镱锂,等.基于等级层次分析法的金沙江下游地区生态功能分区[J].生态学报, 2016, 3366(1):134-147.
    [12]吴良冰,张华,孙毅,等.湿地生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].中国农村水利水电,2009,(10):22-26.
    [13]邓伟,潘响亮,栾兆擎.湿地水文学研究进展[J].水科学进展,2003, 1144(4):521-527.