探讨社区脑卒中高危人群规范化管理后的效果
|
摘要
目的探讨社区脑卒中高危人群规范化管理后的效果。方法于2016年10月至2018年10月选取本地区社区作为研究区域,筛查出社区脑卒中高危人群共计220例,采用抽签的方式将其随机分为干预组和常规组,常规组不做详细干预,干预组则给予相应的干预工作,比较干预后两组患者的相关情况和疾病发病率。结果干预组患者的治疗率、用药率以及药物使用情况和自我管理情况均要明显好于常规组,干预组患者的血压情况要明显好于常规组患者,干预组患者的发病率要明显低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论做好社区脑卒中高危人群规范化管理,提高人群的健康意识,控制行为危险因素,减少或者延缓脑卒中的发生。
Objective To explore the effect of standardized management of high-risk population of stroke in community. Methods From October 2016 to October 2018, 220 high-risk stroke patients were screened out in the community. They were randomly divided into intervention group and routine group by lottery. The routine group no detailed intervention. The intervention group was given corresponding intervention work. The related situation and disease incidence of the two groups were compared after intervention. Results The treatment rate, drug use rate, drug use and self-management of the intervention group were significantly better than those of the conventional group, the blood pressure of the intervention group was significantly better than that of the conventional group, and the incidence of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion Complete standardized management of high-risk population of stroke in community, improve the health awareness of the population, control behavioral risk factors, reduce or delay the occurrence of stroke.
Objective To explore the effect of standardized management of high-risk population of stroke in community. Methods From October 2016 to October 2018, 220 high-risk stroke patients were screened out in the community. They were randomly divided into intervention group and routine group by lottery. The routine group no detailed intervention. The intervention group was given corresponding intervention work. The related situation and disease incidence of the two groups were compared after intervention. Results The treatment rate, drug use rate, drug use and self-management of the intervention group were significantly better than those of the conventional group, the blood pressure of the intervention group was significantly better than that of the conventional group, and the incidence of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion Complete standardized management of high-risk population of stroke in community, improve the health awareness of the population, control behavioral risk factors, reduce or delay the occurrence of stroke.
引文
[1]王静.北京市回龙观社区居民脑卒中高危人群筛查结果分析[J].中国临床保健杂志,2016,19(2):184-186.
[2]高黎黎.上海市浦东新区某社区脑卒中高危人群筛查报告[J].复旦学报(医学版),2017,44(1):82-86.
[3]朱润秀.呼和浩特市脑卒中高危人群筛查研究[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2016,8(12):1455-1457..
[4]马建华.佳木斯市城乡居民脑卒中高危人群筛查结果分析[J].黑龙江医药科学,2017,40(2):95-97.
[5]李秀环.颈部血管彩色多普勒超声在脑卒中高危人群筛查中的应用价值[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(5):65-67.
[6]李莓,陈瑞庚.社区脑卒中高危人群实施个性化随访管理效果探讨[J].医学信息,2016,29(19):84-86.
[7]王倩.医院-社区协同健康管理模式在脑卒中高危人群中的干预效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(26):3205-3209.
[8]高宇,雷晓春,布凡.北京市社区脑卒中高危人群患病危险因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(42):4261-4264.
[9]刘芹,施燕红,牛晓兰,等.社区脑卒中筛查的意义及规范化管理效果分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2013,27(5):16-18.
[10]杨洁,魏东生,罗利俊.武汉市某社区居民脑卒中高危人群健康教育干预效果的调查研究[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2017,12(4):301-303.
[2]高黎黎.上海市浦东新区某社区脑卒中高危人群筛查报告[J].复旦学报(医学版),2017,44(1):82-86.
[3]朱润秀.呼和浩特市脑卒中高危人群筛查研究[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2016,8(12):1455-1457..
[4]马建华.佳木斯市城乡居民脑卒中高危人群筛查结果分析[J].黑龙江医药科学,2017,40(2):95-97.
[5]李秀环.颈部血管彩色多普勒超声在脑卒中高危人群筛查中的应用价值[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(5):65-67.
[6]李莓,陈瑞庚.社区脑卒中高危人群实施个性化随访管理效果探讨[J].医学信息,2016,29(19):84-86.
[7]王倩.医院-社区协同健康管理模式在脑卒中高危人群中的干预效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(26):3205-3209.
[8]高宇,雷晓春,布凡.北京市社区脑卒中高危人群患病危险因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(42):4261-4264.
[9]刘芹,施燕红,牛晓兰,等.社区脑卒中筛查的意义及规范化管理效果分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2013,27(5):16-18.
[10]杨洁,魏东生,罗利俊.武汉市某社区居民脑卒中高危人群健康教育干预效果的调查研究[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2017,12(4):301-303.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |